Digital Pathology Enables Automated and Quantitative Assessment of Inflammatory Activity in Patients with Chronic Liver Disease

Quantitative digital pathology enables automated and quantitative assessment of inflammatory activity in patients with autoimmune hepatitis

Background

Chronic liver disease diagnoses depend on liver biopsy histopathological assessment. However, due to the limitations associated with biopsy, there is growing interest in the use of quantitative digital pathology to support pathologists. We evaluated the performance of computational algorithms in the assessment of hepatic inflammation in an autoimmune hepatitis in which inflammation is a major component.

Methods

Whole-slide digital image analysis was used to quantitatively characterize the area of tissue covered by inflammation [Inflammation Density (ID)] and number of inflammatory foci per unit area [Focal Density (FD)] on tissue obtained from 50 patients with autoimmune hepatitis undergoing routine liver biopsy. Correlations between digital pathology outputs and traditional categorical histology scores, biochemical, and imaging markers were assessed. The ability of ID and FD to stratify between low-moderate (both portal and lobular inflammation ≤1) and moderate-severe disease activity was estimated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).

Results

ID and FD scores increased significantly and linearly with both portal and lobular inflammation grading. Both ID and FD correlated moderately-to-strongly and significantly with histology (portal and lobular inflammation; 0.36≤R≤0.69) and biochemical markers (ALT, AST, GGT, IgG, and gamma globulins; 0.43≤R≤0.57). ID (AUC: 0.85) and FD (AUC: 0.79) had good performance for stratifying between low-moderate and moderate-severe inflammation.

Conclusion

Quantitative assessment of liver biopsy using quantitative digital pathology metrics correlates well with traditional pathology scores and key biochemical markers. Whole-slide quantification of disease can support stratification and identification of patients with more advanced inflammatory disease activity.

Liver fibrosis phenotyping and severity scoring by quantitative image analysis of biopsy slides

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Digital pathology image analysis can phenotype liver fibrosis using histological traits that reflect collagen content, morphometry and architecture. Here, we aimed to calculate fibrosis severity scores to quantify these traits.

METHODS

Liver biopsy slides were categorised by Ishak stage and aetiology. We used a digital pathology technique to calculate four fibrosis severity scores: Architecture Composite Score (ACS), Collagen Composite Score (CCS), Morphometric Composite Score (MCS) and Phenotypic Fibrosis Composite Score (PH-FCS). We compared how these scores varied according to disease stage and aetiology.

RESULTS

We included 80 patients (40% female, mean age 59.0 years, mean collagen proportionate area 17.1%) with mild (F0-2, n = 28), moderate (F3-4, n = 17) or severe (F5-6, n = 35) fibrosis. All four aetiology independent scores corelated with collagen proportionate area (ACS: rp  = .512, CCS: rp  = .727, MCS: rp  = .777, PFCS: r = .772, p < .01 for all) with significant differences between moderate and severe fibrosis (p < .05). ACS increased primarily between moderate and severe fibrosis (by 95% to 226% depending on underlying aetiology), whereas MCS and CCS accumulation was more varied. We used 28 qFTs that distinguished between autoimmune- and alcohol-related liver disease to generate an MCS that significantly differed between mild and severe fibrosis for these aetiologies (p < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

We describe four aetiology-dependent and -independent severity scores that quantify fibrosis architecture, collagen content and fibre morphometry. This approach provides additional insight into how progression of architectural changes and accumulation of collagen may differ depending on underlying disease aetiology.

Digital pathology for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis assessment

Histological assessment of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) has anchored knowledge development about the phenotypes of the condition, their natural history and their clinical course. This fact has led to the use of histological assessment as a reference standard for the evaluation of efficacy of drug interventions for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) - the more histologically active form of NAFLD. However, certain limitations of conventional histological assessment systems pose challenges in drug development. These limitations have spurred intense scientific and commercial development of machine learning and digital approaches towards the assessment of liver histology in patients with NAFLD. This research field remains an area in rapid evolution. In this Perspective article, we summarize the current conventional assessment of NASH and its limitations, the use of specific digital approaches for histological assessment, and their application to the study of NASH and its response to therapy. Although this is not a comprehensive review, the leading tools currently used to assess therapeutic efficacy in drug development are specifically discussed. The potential translation of these approaches to support routine clinical assessment of NAFLD and an agenda for future research are also discussed.

Artificial Intelligence-Based Opportunities in Liver Pathology-A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) can handle a wide range of applications in image analysis, ranging from automated segmentation to diagnostic and prediction. As such, they have revolutionized healthcare, including in the liver pathology field.

OBJECTIVE

The present study aims to provide a systematic review of applications and performances provided by DNN algorithms in liver pathology throughout the Pubmed and Embase databases up to December 2022, for tumoral, metabolic and inflammatory fields.

RESULTS

42 articles were selected and fully reviewed. Each article was evaluated through the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) tool, highlighting their risks of bias.

CONCLUSIONS

DNN-based models are well represented in the field of liver pathology, and their applications are diverse. Most studies, however, presented at least one domain with a high risk of bias according to the QUADAS-2 tool. Hence, DNN models in liver pathology present future opportunities and persistent limitations. To our knowledge, this review is the first one solely focused on DNN-based applications in liver pathology, and to evaluate their bias through the lens of the QUADAS2 tool.

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: the pathologist's perspective

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a spectrum of diseases characterized by fatty accumulation in hepatocytes, ranging from steatosis, non-alcoholic steatohepatitis, to cirrhosis. While histopathological evaluation of liver biopsies plays a central role in the diagnosis of NAFLD, limitations such as the problem of interobserver variability still exist and active research is underway to improve the diagnostic utility of liver biopsies. In this article, we provide a comprehensive overview of the histopathological features of NAFLD, the current grading and staging systems, and discuss the present and future roles of liver biopsies in the diagnosis and prognostication of NAFLD.