Neuromodulation Therapy for Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy: A Systematic Review

Does Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy Fall Within the Spectrum of Complex Regional Pain Syndrome? A Narrative Review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Peripheral neuropathies and complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) result in a similar clinical picture including shared sudomotor and vasomotor symptomatology. Chemotherapeutic agents can precipitate chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) in cancer patients akin to development of CRPS following trauma. Below we review the areas of overlap between CRPS and CIPN including their shared pathophysiology, clinical presentation, diagnostics, and treatment options.

RECENT FINDINGS

The features of autonomic dysfunction, motor impairment, and reduced proprioception observed in both CRPS and CIPN may result from shared mechanisms include inflammatory reactions, immune dysregulation, autonomic changes, as well as central and peripheral sensitization. Both conditions are a clinical diagnosis of exclusion, and demand a personalized, multidisciplinary therapeutic approach inclusive of psychosocial interventions to reduce deleterious effects on an individual's quality of life. CIPN is recognized as a separate clinical entity albeit sharing a similar underlying pathology and clinical presentation with CRPS. It may be plausible to include CIPN on the CRPS clinical spectrum as our mechanistic understanding of its development and progression evolves.

Methodological and statistical characteristics of meta-analyses on spinal cord stimulation for chronic pain: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

A growing number of meta-analyses (MA) have investigated the use of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) as a treatment modality for chronic pain. The quality of these MAs has not been assessed by validated appraisal tools.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the methodological characteristics and quality of MAs related to the use of SCS for chronic pain syndromes.

EVIDENCE REVIEW

An online literature search was conducted in Ovid MEDLINE(R), Ovid EMBASE, Ovid Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Scopus databases (January 1, 2000 through June 30, 2023) to identify MAs that investigated changes in pain intensity, opioid consumption, and/or physical function after SCS for the treatment of chronic pain. MA quality was assessed using A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR-2) critical appraisal tool.

FINDINGS

Twenty-five MAs were appraised in the final analysis. Three were considered "high" quality, three "low" quality, and 19 "critically low" quality, per the AMSTAR-2 criteria. There was no association between the publication year and AMSTAR-2 overall quality (β 0.043; 95% CI -0.008 to 0.095; p=0.097). There was an association between the impact factor and AMSTAR-2 overall quality (β 0.108; 95% CI 0.044 to 0.172; p=0.002), such that studies published in journals with higher impact factors were associated with higher overall quality. There was no association between the effect size and AMSTAR-2 overall quality (β -0.168; 95% CI -0.518 to 0.183; p=0.320).According to our power analysis, three studies were adequately powered (>80%) to reject the null hypothesis, while the remaining studies were underpowered (<80%).

CONCLUSIONS

The study demonstrates a critically low AMSTAR-2 quality for most MAs published on the use of SCS for treating chronic pain. Future MAs should improve study quality by implementing the AMSTAR-2 checklist items.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42023431155.

Global estimates of prevalence of chronic painful neuropathy among patients with chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy: systematic review and meta-analysis of data from 28 countries, 2000-24

INTRODUCTION

Although the prevalence of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) has been reported, the proportion of patients with CIPN who report chronic painful neuropathy remains poorly understood, despite its significant impact on patients' quality of life and treatment outcomes.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The primary outcome was the pooled prevalence of chronic (≥3 months) painful CIPN among patients diagnosed with CIPN. Estimates from each study were transformed using double arcsine transformation and pooled in a meta-analysis using an inverse variance heterogeneity model. Subgroup analysis was conducted based on geographical region, sex, chemotherapy regimen, primary cancer type, and funding source; meta-regression analysis was conducted based on study design, human development index (HDI), and publication year.

RESULTS

77 studies from 28 countries, encompassing 10 962 patients with CIPN, were included. Among patients diagnosed with CIPN, the pooled prevalence of those reporting chronic painful CIPN was estimated at 41.22% (95% CI 32.40 to 50.19; 95% prediction interval 23.71 to 61.28). Substantial heterogeneity was observed across studies (I²=95.27%; 95% CI for I2 94.58 to 95.86). Subgroup analysis revealed that patients treated with platinum based agents and taxanes had the highest prevalence of chronic painful CIPN (40.44% and 38.35%, respectively), and among primary cancers, those with lung cancer reported the highest prevalence of chronic painful CIPN (60.26%). Study design, HDI, and publication year were non-significant moderators of prevalence estimates. Based on our GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) assessment, the certainty of evidence was considered very low.

CONCLUSION

This study provides the first comprehensive global estimate of the prevalence of chronic painful CIPN, highlighting its significant burden on patients worldwide. The variation in prevalence across geographical regions, chemotherapy regimens, and primary cancers underscores the need for tailored pain management strategies and further research to address potential disparities.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42024579459.

Neurostimulation for the Treatment of Cancer-Induced Pain: A Scoping Review

OBJECTIVES

Cancer pain is among the most prevalent and challenging symptoms in cancer care, with up to 95% of patients with late-stage cancer experiencing moderate-to-severe pain. Conventional pharmacologic treatments, including opioids, carry risks, and patients' conditions may be refractory to medical management or have contraindications. Neurostimulation techniques, such as spinal cord stimulation (SCS), dorsal root ganglion stimulation (DRGS), and peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS), have shown promise in treating treatment-induced cancer pain. However, a comprehensive review focusing on these techniques for cancer-induced pain alone is necessary.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A comprehensive literature review was conducted using Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library data bases, focusing on studies from 2000 onward. Inclusion criteria included interventional and observational studies reporting on SCS, DRGS, and PNS in cancer-induced pain. Studies addressing treatment-induced pain, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and non-English studies were excluded. Data were extracted and evaluated using the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system.

RESULTS

The search yielded 831 references, with 24 studies meeting the inclusion criteria. Sixteen studies focused on SCS, seven on PNS, and two cases on DRGS. SCS showed significant pain reduction, with an average decrease in numeric rating scale (NRS) scores from 8.0 to 2.2 over an average 8.4-month follow-up period. PNS also indicated substantial pain relief, with NRS scores decreasing from 8.29 to 3.04 over an average 5.2-month follow-up period. DRGS, although less studied, showed a reduction in NRS scores from 6.0 to 1.0 over an average 6.0-month follow-up period. SCS was associated with a significant reduction in opioid use, with average reported morphine equivalent daily dose (MEDD) change from 1152.2 mg to 739.7 mg over an average 5.0-month period, whereas PNS and DRGS had limited impact on opioid consumption, with no reported MEDD change.

CONCLUSIONS

Our scoping review synthesizes evidence on neurostimulation interventions for treating cancer-induced pain. Current evidence suggests that interventions such as SCS, DRGS, and PNS may provide clinically meaningful pain relief in patients with cancer-induced pain. Several studies also reported improvements in functionality and quality of life. However, the level of evidence is limited owing to the lack of prospective comparative studies, clinical and methodologic heterogeneity, and small sample sizes.

Comparative efficacy of closed-loop spinal cord stimulation and dorsal root ganglion stimulation through combination trialing for cancer pain - A retrospective case series

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy of closed-loop spinal cord stimulation (CL-SCS) and dorsal root ganglion (DRG) stimulation in managing chronic cancer-related pain.

MATERIAL/METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted with IRB exemption for four patients with cancer-related pain who underwent combination stimulator trials. Patients were trialed with both CL-SCS and DRG stimulation for 8-10 days, with assessments of pain relief, functional improvement, sleep improvement, pain medication changes, and overall satisfaction.

RESULTS

All four patients reported significant relief and functional improvement with both CL-SCS and DRG stimulations. CL-SCS provided a range of 12.9-19.6 million adjustments during the trial period. Neural dose was delivered at a median dose ratio of 1.35 and median dose accuracy of 4.9 μV. Patients 1-3 preferred CL-SCS for paresthesia-based stimulation, having the potential to expand pain coverage, full-body MRI compatibility, and real-time automated adjustment features. Patient 4 favored DRG for its ability to provide slightly greater relief, over one aspect of his pain area, despite having comparable coverage with CL-SCS.

CONCLUSIONS

The consistent and adaptable delivery of CL-SCS may bridge the gap in efficacy that DRG therapy has held over traditional dorsal column stimulation for historically complex and focal conditions that suggests further investigation.

Effects of Spinal Cord Stimulation in Patients with Small Fiber and Associated Comorbidities from Neuropathy After Multiple Etiologies

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) on pain, neuropathic symptoms, and other health-related metrics in patients with chronic painful peripheral neuropathy (PN) from multiple etiologies. Methods: A prospective single center observational longitudinal cohort study assessed SCS efficacy from April 2023 to May 2024, with follow-ups at 2, 4, 6, and 12 months in 19 patients suffering from the painful polyneuropathy of diverse etiologies: diabetic (DPN), idiopathic (CIAP), chemotherapy-induced (CIPN), and others. Patients were implanted with a neurostimulator (WaveWriter AlphaTM, Boston Scientific Corporation, Valencia, CA, USA) and percutaneous leads targeting the lower limbs (T10-T11) and, if necessary, the upper limbs (C4-C7). Stimulation programming was individualized based on patient preference and best response. Assessments were performed before and after implantation and included pain intensity (VAS and DN4), neuropathic pain symptoms (NPSI and SF-MPQ-2), autonomic symptoms (SFN-SIQ and SAS), sensory and small fiber nerve injury (UENS), functionality (GAF), sleep (CPSI), global impression of change (CGI and PGI), and quality of life (EQ-VAS and EQ-5D). Intra-epidermal nerve fiber density (IENFD) via skin biopsy was also performed at baseline (diagnostic) and after 12 months to assess potential small fiber re-growth. Statistical analyses were conducted to determine the evolution of treatment success. Results: To date, 19 patients have undergone implantation and completed follow-up. SCS produced a significant consistent and sustained improvement in pain intensity by 49% in DN4 and 76% in VAS, in neuropathic pain symptoms by 73%, in autonomic symptoms by 26-30%, in the sensorimotor physical exam by 8%, in functionality by 44%, in sleep by 74%, and in quality of life (69% for EQ-VAS and 134% EQ-5D). Both clinicians and patients had a meaningful global impression of change, at 1.1 and 1.3, respectively. Distal intra-epidermal nerve fiber density improved by 22% at 12 months while proximal intra-epidermal nerve fiber density decreased by 18%. Conclusions: SCS is an effective therapy for managing various types of PN.

Neural networks involved in painful diabetic neuropathy: A systematic review

OBJECTIVES

Diabetic distal symmetric polyneuropathy, affecting up to 50% of adults with diabetes, often leads to painful symptoms; yet current treatments are largely ineffective with standard therapies providing limited relief. The aim of this systematic review is to address the knowledge gap in understanding the neural networks associated with painful diabetic polyneuropathy (P-DPN). By synthesizing evidence from neuroimaging studies, it seeks to identify potential targets for neuromodulation-based treatments, ultimately guiding clinicians and researchers in developing novel, more effective therapeutic interventions for P-DPN.

CONTENT

A comprehensive search following the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis was conducted across Embase, PsycINFO, and MEDLINE databases to identify relevant neuroimaging studies from 2010 to May 2024. The search focused on studies involving P-DPN and excluded animal research. After the removal of duplicates and irrelevant studies, 18 studies were included and critically appraised for their contributions to understanding the neural correlates of P-DPN.

SUMMARY

The review highlights that P-DPN is associated with alterations in brain networks involved in pain perception, particularly in the primary somatosensory cortex highlighting its role in sensory and pain perception. Regions such as the anterior cingulate cortex and thalamus exhibit altered functional connectivity, with the former showing responses to pain treatment. The review also identified increased connectivity between the cingulate cortex, medial prefrontal cortex, medial temporal region, and insula in individuals with P-DPN, pointing to the involvement of these regions in the emotional and cognitive aspects of pain processing.

OUTLOOK

This review provides a foundational understanding of the neural networks involved in P-DPN, offering potential targets for future neuromodulation therapies. Further research is required to deepen the understanding of these brain alterations and to explore how they can be leveraged for more effective P-DPN treatments.

A Review of Remote Monitoring in Neuromodulation for Chronic Pain Management

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Neuromodulation techniques have emerged as promising strategies for managing chronic pain. These techniques encompass various modalities of nerve stimulation, including Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS), Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation (DRG-S), and Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS). Studies consistently demonstrate significant improvements in pain intensity, quality of life, and reduced opioid usage among patients treated with these modalities. However, neuromodulation presents challenges, such as the need for frequent in-person follow-up visits to ensure proper functionality of the implanted device. Our review explored factors impacting compliance in current neuromodulation users and examined how remote monitoring can mitigate some of these challenges. We also discuss outcomes of recent studies related to remote monitoring of neuromodulation.

RECENT FINDINGS

While remote monitoring capabilities for neuromodulation devices is an emerging development, there are promising results supporting its role in improving outcomes for chronic pain patients. Higher patient satisfaction, improved pain control, and reduced caretaker burdens have been observed with the use of remote monitoring. This review discusses the current challenges with neuromodulation therapy and highlights the role of remote monitoring. As the field continues to evolve, understanding the importance of remote monitoring for neuromodulation is crucial for optimizing pain management outcomes.

Psychophysical and Functional Outcomes in Chemotherapy-induced Peripheral Neuropathy After Spinal Cord Stimulation: A Narrative Review and Case Series

OBJECTIVES

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a complication that may occur after treatment with various anticancer drugs. In refractory CIPN cases, spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has garnered increased attention. The use of gait analysis and psychophysical quantitative sensory testing (QST) as an objective measurement of CIPN-related damage has burgeoned; however, these changes have not been reported for patients with CIPN after SCS implantation using either burst or tonic stimulation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This manuscript encompasses two parts: 1) a presentation of pain improvement in a series of patients who underwent tonic vs burst SCS for CIPN measured by gait and QST analysis and 2) a narrative review on gait and psychophysical QST outcomes between burst and tonic SCS stimulation pertaining to pain and the extrapolation to CIPN-related sequalae.

RESULTS

In these cases, gait scores improved in both patients. Touch thresholds were higher before SCS whereas skin temperatures were lower at the dorsal foot, subtalus, and posterior calf. Sharpness detection was drastically improved after SCS. In the review, the patients aligned with pain relief, suggesting good response to interventional outcomes with SCS. QST outcomes, particularly touch, sharpness, heat, and cold stimuli, however, were not fully corroborated. Similarly to other non-CIPN SCS gait studies, both tonic and burst studies provided positive outcomes on spatiotemporal gait parameters, gait form, and standardized gait scales.

CONCLUSION

We emphasize the use of different SCS waveforms as a therapy for CIPN management and the use of psychophysical testing as a measure for diagnosis and monitoring CIPN's progress in our case series and review.

Targeting dorsal root ganglia for chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy: from bench to bedside

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a debilitating condition affecting an increasing number of cancer survivors worldwide. However, insights into its pathophysiology and availability of effective therapies remain lacking. Dorsal root ganglia (DRG) have been studied as a key component of chemotherapeutic drug toxicity and a potential therapeutic target for CIPN treatment. This comprehensive review aims to synthesize, summarize, and correlate the results of both preclinical and clinical studies relevant to the pathophysiology and management of CIPN in relation to the DRG. Design: Review. A thorough literature search was conducted using the terms 'dorsal root ganglion' and 'chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy', along with appropriate variations. Searched databases included PubMed, EMBASE, Medline, Cochrane Library, Wiley Library, and Web of Science. Inclusion criteria targeted all English language, peer-reviewed original research from the inception of these databases to the present year. Review articles, book chapters, and other nonoriginal publications were excluded. Of 134 relevant studies identified, the majority were preclinical studies elucidating how various chemotherapeutic agents, especially taxanes, disrupt neurotransmission, inflammatory processes, and apoptotic pathways within sensory neurons of DRG. Not only do these effects correlate with the presentation of CIPN, but their disruption has also been shown to reduce CIPN symptoms in preclinical models. However, clinical studies addressing DRG interventions are very limited in number and scope at this time. These results reveal various pathways within DRG that may be effective targets for CIPN treatment. While limited, clinical studies do offer promise in the utility of DRG neuromodulation in managing painful CIPN. In the future, clinical trials are needed to assess interventions aimed at these neuronal and nonneuronal pathological targets to better treat this complex condition.

The Efficacy of Neuromodulation Interventions for Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Purpose

To determine the efficacy and safety of a neuromodulation intervention regimen in the treatment of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN).

Patients and Methods

Systematic searches were conducted in seven English databases. Randomized controlled trials of all neuromodulation interventions (both invasive and non-invasive) for the treatment of CIPN were selected. Group comparisons of differences between interventions and controls were also made. We divided the outcomes into immediate-term effect (≤3 weeks), short-term effect (3 weeks to ≤3 months), and long-term effect (>3 months).

Results

Sixteen studies and 946 patients with CIPN were included. Among immediate-term effects, neuromodulation interventions were superior to usual care for improving pain (SMD=-0.77, 95% CI -1.07~ 0.47), FACT-Ntx (MD = 5.35, 95% CI 2.84~ 7.87), and QOL (SMD = 0.44, 95% CI 0.09~ 0.79) (moderate certainty); neuromodulation loaded with usual care was superior to usual care for improving pain (SMD=-0.47, 95% CI -0.71 ~ -0.23), and QOL (SMD = 0.40, 95% CI 0.12 ~ 0.69) (moderate certainty). There were no statistically significant differences between the neuromodulation interventions regimen vs usual care in short- and long-term outcomes and neuromodulation vs sham stimulation from any outcome measure. There were mild adverse events such as pain at the site of stimulation and bruising, and no serious adverse events were reported.

Conclusion

Neuromodulation interventions had significant immediate-term efficacy in CIPN but had not been shown to be superior to sham stimulation; short-term and long-term efficacy could not be determined because there were too few original RCTs. Moreover, there are no serious adverse effects of this therapy.

Role of pattern recognition receptors in chemotherapy-induced neuropathic pain

Progress in the development of effective chemotherapy is producing a growing population of patients with acute and chronic painful chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN), a serious treatment-limiting side effect for which there is currently no US Food and Drug Administration-approved treatment. CIPNs induced by diverse classes of chemotherapy drugs have remarkably similar clinical presentations, leading to the suggestion they share underlying mechanisms. Sensory neurons share with immune cells the ability to detect damage associated molecular patterns (DAMPs), molecules produced by diverse cell types in response to cellular stress and injury, including by chemotherapy drugs. DAMPs, in turn, are ligands for pattern recognition receptors (PRRs), several of which are found on sensory neurons, as well as satellite cells, and cells of the immune system. In the present experiments, we evaluated the role of two PRRs, TLR4 and RAGE, present in dorsal root ganglion (DRG), in CIPN. Antisense (AS)-oligodeoxynucleotides (ODN) against TLR4 and RAGE mRNA were administered intrathecally before ('prevention protocol') or 3 days after ('reversal protocol') the last administration of each of three chemotherapy drugs that treat cancer by different mechanisms (oxaliplatin, paclitaxel and bortezomib). TLR4 and RAGE AS-ODN prevented the development of CIPN induced by all three chemotherapy drugs. In the reversal protocol, however, while TLR4 AS-ODN completely reversed oxaliplatin- and paclitaxel-induced CIPN, in rats with bortezomib-induced CIPN it only produced a temporary attenuation. RAGE AS-ODN, in contrast, reversed CIPN induced by all three chemotherapy drugs. When a TLR4 antagonist was administered intradermally to the peripheral nociceptor terminal, it did not affect CIPN induced by any of the chemotherapy drugs. However, when administered intrathecally, to the central terminal, it attenuated hyperalgesia induced by all three chemotherapy drugs, compatible with a role of TLR4 in neurotransmission at the central terminal but not sensory transduction at the peripheral terminal. Finally, since it has been established that cultured DRG neurons can be used to study direct effects of chemotherapy on nociceptors, we also evaluated the role of TLR4 in CIPN at the cellular level, using patch-clamp electrophysiology in DRG neurons cultured from control and chemotherapy-treated rats. We found that increased excitability of small-diameter DRG neurons induced by in vivo and in vitro exposure to oxaliplatin is TLR4-dependent. Our findings suggest that in addition to the established contribution of PRR-dependent neuroimmune mechanisms, PRRs in DRG cells also have an important role in CIPN.

The nerve cells in gastrointestinal cancers: from molecular mechanisms to clinical intervention

Gastrointestinal (GI) cancer is a formidable malignancy with significant morbidity and mortality rates. Recent studies have shed light on the complex interplay between the nervous system and the GI system, influencing various aspects of GI tumorigenesis, such as the malignance of cancer cells, the conformation of tumor microenvironment (TME), and the resistance to chemotherapies. The discussion in this review first focused on exploring the intricate details of the biological function of the nervous system in the development of the GI tract and the progression of tumors within it. Meanwhile, the cancer cell-originated feedback regulation on the nervous system is revealed to play a crucial role in the growth and development of nerve cells within tumor tissues. This interaction is vital for understanding the complex relationship between the nervous system and GI oncogenesis. Additionally, the study identified various components within the TME that possess a significant influence on the occurrence and progression of GI cancer, including microbiota, immune cells, and fibroblasts. Moreover, we highlighted the transformation relationship between non-neuronal cells and neuronal cells during GI cancer progression, inspiring the development of strategies for nervous system-guided anti-tumor drugs. By further elucidating the deep mechanism of various neuroregulatory signals and neuronal intervention, we underlined the potential of these targeted drugs translating into effective therapies for GI cancer treatment. In summary, this review provides an overview of the mechanisms of neuromodulation and explores potential therapeutic opportunities, providing insights into the understanding and management of GI cancers.

Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy: Diagnosis, Agents, General Clinical Presentation, and Treatments

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review aims to discuss pathophysiology, diagnosis, clinical presentation, and treatment of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy. Agent-specific presentation and pathophysiology is also being discussed.

RECENT FINDINGS

As new systemic oncological treatments continue to be developed, the number of cancer survivors continues to grow. Survivors are living longer with the long-term side effects of oncological treatments. We reviewed the pathophysiology of agent-specific chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy and the updates in its treatment and preventative tools. Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy is a debilitating long-term side effect that often impairs cancer survivors' function and quality of life. The increasing life expectancy of cancer survivors has resulted in increased prevalence of this condition. Understanding its intricacies can provide physicians with better treatment tools and research opportunities to develop or identify new therapeutic agents.

Treatment of pain in length-dependent peripheral neuropathy with the use of spinal cord stimulation: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Chronic intractable pain from peripheral neuropathy is a debilitating condition that might not respond to conventional medical management and pharmacotherapy. The primary objective of this systematic review was to assess change (or reduction) in pain intensity in patients with length-dependent peripheral neuropathy after spinal cord stimulation (SCS) therapy.

METHODS

This systematic review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. The primary outcome was change (or reduction) in pain intensity after 12 months of SCS therapy compared with baseline in participants with length-dependent peripheral neuropathy. Secondary outcomes included change in pain intensity after 6 months and change in opioid consumption after 12 months. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) guidelines were used to appraise the quality of evidence.

RESULTS

Nineteen studies consisting of 376 participants who underwent SCS implantation met the inclusion criteria. Qualitative synthesis revealed that all eligible studies reported a significant improvement in pain intensity after 12 months of SCS therapy as compared with baseline. Mean differences with 95% confidence intervals were calculated for 4 studies, all of which achieved the minimal clinically important difference for change in pain intensity at 12 months. The GRADE quality of evidence for this outcome was appraised as very low quality.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review highlights that SCS could lead to significant improvement in pain intensity for length-dependent peripheral neuropathy, although future well-powered randomized controlled trials are warranted to increase the certainty of evidence in this finding.

STUDY REGISTRATION

PROSPERO (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/) ID: CRD42022377572.

Cancer Pain Management: A Narrative Review of Current Concepts, Strategies, and Techniques

Pain is frequently reported during cancer disease, and it still remains poorly controlled in 40% of patients. Recent developments in oncology have helped to better control pain. Targeted treatments may cure cancer disease and significantly increase survival. Therefore, a novel population of patients (cancer survivors) has emerged, also enduring chronic pain (27.6% moderate to severe pain). The present review discusses the different options currently available to manage pain in (former) cancer patients in light of progress made in the last decade. Major progress in the field includes the recent development of a chronic cancer pain taxonomy now included in the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11) and the update of the WHO analgesic ladder. Until recently, cancer pain management has mostly relied on pharmacotherapy, with opioids being considered as the mainstay. The opioids crisis has prompted the reassessment of opioids use in cancer patients and survivors. This review focuses on the current utilization of opioids, the neuropathic pain component often neglected, and the techniques and non-pharmacological strategies available which help to personalize patient treatment. Cancer pain management is now closer to the management of chronic non-cancer pain, i.e., "an integrative and supportive pain care" aiming to improve patient's quality of life.

Microbiological and Physiological Effects of Pain

Pain is an important innate defense mechanism that can dramatically alter a person's quality of life. Understanding the microbiological and physiological effects of pain may be important in the pursuit of novel pain interventions. The three descriptors of pain recognized by the International Association for the Study of Pain are nociceptive, neuropathic, and nociplastic pain. Our review examined the current understanding of all three pain types, focusing on the key molecules involved in the manifestation of each type as well as physiological effects. Additionally, we compared the differences in painful and painless neuropathies and discussed the neuroimmune interaction involved in the manifestation of pain.

Evidence-Based Treatment of Pain in Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a debilitating and often painful condition that occurs after administration of chemotherapeutic agents. The primary objective of this systematic review was to appraise the literature on conservative, pharmacological, and interventional treatment options for CIPN pain.

RECENT FINDINGS

There is level I evidence supporting modest to moderate improvement in CIPN pain from duloxetine treatment, as well as short-term modest improvement from physical therapy and acupuncture. Although opioid and cannabis administration may provide short-term modest improvement, administration is commonly limited by side effects. Generally, most studies reported no clinical benefit from yoga, topical neuropathic agents, gabapentinoids, and tricyclic antidepressants. Evidence is currently equivocal for scrambler therapy and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation. Finally, evidence on neuromodulation options is limited to mostly case reports/series and one observational study highlighting moderate improvement with auricular nerve stimulation. This systematic review provides an overview of conservative, pharmacologic, and interventional treatment modalities for CIPN pain. Furthermore, it provides a level of evidence and degree of recommendation based on the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) criteria for each specific treatment modality.

A Review of Chronic Pain and Device Interventions: Benefits and Future Directions

Chronic pain is a debilitating condition with a growing prevalence both in the USA and globally. The complex nature of this condition necessitates a multimodal approach to pain management that extends beyond the established pharmaceutical interventions currently employed. A variety of devices comprising both invasive and noninvasive approaches are available to patients, serving as adjuvants to existing regimens. The benefits of these interventions are notable for their lack of addiction potential, potential for patient autonomy regarding self-administration, minimal to no drug interaction, and overall relative safety. However, there remains a need for further research and more robust clinical trials to assess the true efficacy of these interventions and elucidate if there is an underlying physiological mechanism to their benefit in treating chronic pain or if their effect is predominantly placebo in nature. Regardless, the field of device-based intervention and treatment remains an evolving field with much promise for the future chronic pain management.