Update on the Pharmacological Treatment of Primary Biliary Cholangitis

Cholestatic liver diseases: modern therapeutics

INTRODUCTION

Cholestatic liver disease encompasses a broad group of disorders related to impaired normal bile formation, secretion, or excretion. These diseases present with symptoms of fatigue, jaundice, pruritus, and biochemical changes.

AREAS COVERED

We focus on updates in the management of autoimmune cholestatic liver disease. The mainstay therapy in PBC is UDCA (ursodeoxycholic acid), but OCA (obeticholic acid) can be considered if suboptimal response or intolerance. Fibrates have shown some promising effects in PBC patients who have not responded to or are intolerant of UDCA and/or OCA; however, they are not FDA approved. Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor Agonists (PPARs) have emerged as a promising new class of oral agents in PBC. Also, Ileal Bile Acid Transporter (IBAT) inhibitors are being investigated for the treatment of pruritus related to PBC. There are no available treatments for PSC; however, there have been previous investigations into many agents. There are ongoing clinical trials investigating the role of various antibiotics, PPARs, and immunomodulators for the treatment of PSC.

EXPERT OPINION

Ongoing investigations into the treatment of both PBC and PSC are essential. We anticipate that alternative management strategies for PBC and PSC will continue to arise in the next 5-10 years.

Obeticholic Acid Improves Cholestasis, Liver Fibrosis, and Liver Function in Patients with Primary Biliary Cholangitis with Inadequate Response to Ursodeoxycholic Acid

Background and Aims: Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) leads to the slow, progressive destruction of the small bile ducts with consecutive cholestasis and intrahepatic cholangitis. If this disease remains untreated, liver parenchyma will be damaged resulting in fibrosis and end-stage liver disease with the need for transplantation. The approval of the Farnesoid X receptor agonist obeticholic acid (Ocaliva; OCA) in early 2017 expanded the drug therapy options of PBC, which previously consisted primarily of the administration of ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA). Patients and Methods: Included in our prospective pilot study were 16 patients with a confirmed diagnosis of PBC who were treated with an add-on therapy with OCA (5 mg/d). None of the patients had an overlap to autoimmune hepatitis. Patients were investigated between 09/2022 and 09/2023. Results: The majority of patients was female (15/16, 93.75%), and the mean age was 57.63 ± 9.59 (43-77) years. OCA treatment led to a statistically significant decrease in aspartate aminotransferase (AST; AST baseline: 38.50 [26.25; 50.00] IU/L vs. AST 6-month follow-up: 23.50 [21.50; 44.25] IU/L, p = 0.0012), alanine aminotransferase (ALT; ALT baseline: 55.50 [28.75; 97.00] IU/L vs. ALT 6-month follow-up: 36.50 [28.00; 57.25] IU/L, p = 0.0035), and gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT; GGT baseline: 168.00 [100.30; 328.50] IU/L vs. GGT 6-month follow-up: 88.00 [44.50; 259.80] IU/L, p = 0.0063), while the decrease in alkaline phosphatase (AP) was not statistically significant (AP baseline: 197.00 [170.00; 253.30] IU/L vs. AP 6-month follow-up: 196.00 [134.00; 227.00] IU/L, p = 0.0915). In addition, liver stiffness measurement (LSM) showed a statistically significant decrease after six months of treatment with OCA (LSM baseline: 7.85 [5.55; 10.13] kPa vs. LSM 6-month follow-up: 5.95 [4.55; 8.225] kPa, p = 0.0001). However, the increase in enzymatic liver function measured by LiMAx failed to reach statistical significance, but showed a positive trend (LiMAx baseline: 402.50 [341.50; 469.80] μg/kg/h vs. LiMAx 6-month follow-up: 452.50 [412.50; 562.00] μg/kg/h, p = 0.0625). In none of our patients did therapy with obeticholic acid have to be stopped due to pruritus or poor tolerability. Conclusions: In patients with PBC without adequate response to UDCA, OCA is a promising alternative, which in our group of 16 patients led to a significant improvement of liver enzymes, the amelioration of liver fibrosis, and an increase in liver function capacity in a short-term clinical course.

Current Landscape and Evolving Therapies for Primary Biliary Cholangitis

Primary Biliary Cholangitis (PBC) is a chronic autoimmune liver disorder characterized by progressive cholestatic that, if untreated, can progress to liver fibrosis, cirrhosis and liver decompensation requiring liver transplant. Although the pathogenesis of the disease is multifactorial, there is a consensus that individuals with a genetic predisposition develop the disease in the presence of specific environmental triggers. A dysbiosis of intestinal microbiota is increasingly considered among the potential pathogenic factors. Cholangiocytes, the epithelial cells lining the bile ducts, are the main target of a dysregulated immune response, and cholangiocytes senescence has been recognized as a driving mechanism, leading to impaired bile duct function, in disease progression. Bile acids are also recognized as playing an important role, both in disease development and therapy. Thus, while bile acid-based therapies, specifically ursodeoxycholic acid and obeticholic acid, have been the cornerstone of therapy in PBC, novel therapeutic approaches have been developed in recent years. In this review, we will examine published and ongoing clinical trials in PBC, including the recently approved peroxisome-proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) agonist, elafibranor and seladelpar. These novel second-line therapies are expected to improve therapy in PBC and the development of personalized approaches.

Emerging drugs for the treatment of progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis: a focus on phase II and III trials

INTRODUCTION

Progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis (PFIC) is a group of disorders characterized by inappropriate bile formation, causing hepatic accumulation of bile acids and, subsequently, liver injury. Until recently, no approved treatments were available for these patients.

AREAS COVERED

Recent clinical trials for PFIC treatment have focused on intestine-restricted ileal bile acid transporter (IBAT) inhibitors. These compounds aim to reduce the pool size of bile acids by interrupting their enterohepatic circulation. Other emerging treatments in the pipeline include systemic IBAT inhibitors, synthetic bile acid derivatives, compounds targeting bile acid synthesis via the FXR/FGF axis, and chaperones/potentiators that aim to enhance the residual activity of the mutated transporters.

EXPERT OPINION

Substantial progress has been made in drug development for PFIC patients during the last couple of years. Although data concerning long-term efficacy are as yet only scarcely available, new therapies have demonstrated robust efficacy in a considerable fraction of patients at least on the shorter term. However, a substantial fraction of PFIC patients do not respond to these novel therapies and thus still requires surgical treatment, including liver transplantation before adulthood. Hence, there is still an unmet medical need for long-term effective medical, preferably non-surgical, treatment for all PFIC patients.

Progress in the Management of Patients with Cholestatic Liver Disease: Where Are We and Where Are We Going?

Cholestatic liver disease is a group of diseases in which bile acid accumulates in the liver for various reasons, resulting in abnormal liver biochemical indicators and histological damage. Cholestasis can be divided into intrahepatic cholestasis and extrahepatic cholestasis, which will contribute to liver damage and progress to liver fibrosis and cirrhosis. Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) and primary sclerosing cholangitis are the two most typical cholestatic liver diseases. Ursodeoxycholic acid is currently the first-line treatment for PBC, while obeticholic acid, budesonide and fibrates have also shown good potential in the treatment of PBC. There are currently no official drugs approved to treat primary sclerosing cholangitis, and the use of ursodeoxycholic acid may have certain clinical benefits. At present, progress has been made in new treatment directions for cholestatic liver disease, including fibroblast growth factor 19, cholestyramine, S-adenosyl-L-methionine, steroid drugs, farnesoid X receptor agonists, and more. Considerable progress has been made in the management of cholestatic liver disease but there are still many opportunities and challenges. In this review, we summarized the recommended guidelines for the management of cholestatic disease and the progress of new drug research and development, in order to provide an important reference for the clinical practice of cholestatic liver disease.

Prevalence of Apical Periodontitis in Patients with Autoimmune Liver Diseases on Immune Suppressants and Immune Modulators: A Cross-sectional Study

INTRODUCTION

Autoimmune liver diseases (ALDs) are chronic conditions generated by an immune-mediated autoaggressive inflammatory reaction in genetically susceptible individuals. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of apical periodontitis (AP) in patients suffering from ALDs undergoing treatment with the immune suppressants glucocorticoids, azathioprine, and/or ursodeoxycholic acid.

METHODS

The ALD group included 46 patients (11 men and 35 women, average age = 57.9 ± 11.8 years) and 1186 teeth. The control group included 50 healthy patients not taking any medications (15 men and 35 women, average age = 58.6 ± 10.4 years) and 1251 teeth. Demographic data and medical, pharmacologic, and dental history were recorded. Dental and radiographic examinations were performed. The presence of AP; the periapical index score; decayed, missing, and filled teeth; quality of restoration, and root canal treatment were evaluated. The influence of the medications the patients were taking on the prevalence of AP was also tested.

RESULTS

The prevalence of AP was significantly lower in ALDs than in the control group at the patient (P = .019) and tooth level (P = .014). Smoking and age were associated with a significant increase in AP in cases and controls (P = .045 and P = .001, respectively). In both groups, endodontically treated teeth showed a higher prevalence of AP.

CONCLUSIONS

Considering the limitations because of the observational nature of the study, the patients affected by ALDs liver diseases and undergoing treatment with immune suppressors (often associated with immune modulators) were found to exhibit a lower prevalence of AP.

The role of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors in the regulation of bile acid metabolism

Bile acids are synthesized from cholesterol in the liver. Dysregulation of bile acid homeostasis, characterized by excessive accumulation in the liver, gallbladder and blood, can lead to hepatocellular damage and the development of cholestatic liver disease. Nuclear receptors play a crucial role in the control of bile acid metabolism by efficiently regulating bile acid synthesis and transport in the liver. Among these receptors, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR), a ligand-activated transcription factor belonging to the nuclear hormone receptor superfamily, controls the expression of genes involved in adipogenesis, lipid metabolism, inflammation and glucose homeostasis and has emerged as a potential therapeutic target for the treatment of the metabolic syndrome in the past two decades. Emerging evidence suggests that PPAR activation holds promise as a therapeutic target for cholestatic liver disease, as it affects both bile acid production and transport. This review provides a comprehensive overview of recent advances in elucidating the role of PPAR in the regulation of bile acid metabolism, highlighting the current position of PPAR agonists in the treatment of primary biliary cholangitis. By summarizing the specific regulatory effects of PPAR on bile acids, this review contributes to the exploration of novel therapeutic strategies for cholestatic liver diseases.

Current Therapies for Cholestatic Diseases

Cholestasis is a condition characterized by decrease in bile flow due to progressive pathological states that lead to chronic cholestatic liver diseases which affect the biliary tree at the intrahepatic level and extrahepatic level. They induce complications such as cirrhosis, liver failure, malignancies, bone disease and nutritional deficiencies that merit close follow-up and specific interventions. Furthermore, as those conditions progress to liver cirrhosis, there will be an increase in mortality but also an important impact in quality of life and economic burden due to comorbidities related with liver failure. Therefore, it is important that clinicians understand the treatment options for cholestatic liver diseases. With a general view of therapeutic options and their molecular targets, this review addresses the pathophysiology of cholangiopathies. The objective is to provide clinicians with an overview of the safety and efficacy of the treatment of cholangiopathies based on the current evidence.

Advances in Pathogenesis and Therapeutics of Hepatobiliary Diseases

The hepatobiliary system, comprising the liver, gallbladder, and bile ducts, performs a diverse array of functions that are essential to maintaining homeostasis [...].