Challenging the Pleiotropic Effects of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Geriatric Depression: A Multimodal Case Series Study

Advancing post-stroke cognitive rehabilitation through high-frequency neurostimulation: A retrospective evaluation of cortical excitability and biomarker modulation

BackgroundPost-stroke cognitive impairment (PSCI) poses significant challenges to patient independence, yet technological interventions like high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) remain underexplored in clinical neurorehabilitation.ObjectiveThis study evaluates the integration of high-frequency rTMS into standard care, focusing on its technological efficacy in modulating neuroplasticity and serum biomarkers to enhance cognitive and functional recovery.MethodsA retrospective analysis of 80 PSCI patients (2021-2023) compared outcomes between a conventional care group (n = 30) and an rTMS group (n = 50) receiving 20 Hz stimulation (YRD-CCY-I device) targeting the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Key metrics included Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), Barthel Index (BI), cortical silent period (CL), central motor conduction time (CMCT), and serum neurotrophic factors (BDNF, VEGF, IGF-1).ResultsPost-intervention, the rTMS group demonstrated superior MoCA scores (19.25 vs. 15.24, p = 0.001), BI (76.36 vs. 70.13, p = 0.001), and IADL (20.38 vs. 18.13, p = 0.001) compared to controls. Neurophysiological markers revealed prolonged CL (25.30 vs. 24.02 ms, p = 0.001) and shortened CMCT (12.05 vs. 12.98 ms, p = 0.001), alongside elevated BDNF (9.56 vs. 7.34 ng/mL), VEGF (156.48 vs. 110.54 pg/mL), and IGF-1 (153.74 vs. 112.90 ng/mL, p = 0.001). Overall efficacy was 94% for rTMS versus 73.33% for conventional care (p = 0.047).ConclusionHigh-frequency rTMS, as a targeted neurostimulation technology, enhances cognitive recovery and cortical adaptability in PSCI by modulating neuroplasticity and upregulating neurotrophic biomarkers. These findings underscore its potential as a scalable adjunct in technology-driven neurorehabilitation programs.

A Systematic Review of the Effects of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Combined With Pharmacological Intervention on Sleep Quality and Depressive Symptoms in Patients With Depression

To systematically evaluate the intervention effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) combined with pharmacological interventions on sleep quality and depressive symptoms in patients with depression, identify optimal stimulation parameters, and explore potential clinical applications to facilitate individualised therapeutic strategies. Databases including Pubmed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase, CNKI, Wanfang Medical Database, and VIP database were searched up to 31 December 2024, for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing rTMS combined with pharmacological intervention for sleep disorders and depressive symptoms in patients with depression. Data analysis was performed using Stata software. 17 RCTs involving 1667 patients were included. Meta-analysis revealed that rTMS significantly improved sleep quality (SMD = -0.57, 95% CI: -1.02 to -0.12, P < 0.05) and reduced depressive symptoms (SMD = -0.73, 95% CI: -1.37 to -0.10, P < 0.05). Subgroup analyses showed that the optimal parameters for improving sleep quality were high-frequency rTMS targeting the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, high stimulation intensity, low total pulse count (< 1200 pulses), session duration ≤ 20 min daily, for 5-8 weeks. For depressive symptoms, a daily treatment duration of 21-30 min was more effective under similar parameter conditions. rTMS effectively improves sleep quality and alleviates depressive symptoms in patients with depression, showing a dose-dependent effect with stimulation parameters. However, in patients with a prolonged disease course or greater symptom severity, particularly those with vascular and other neurological comorbidities, rTMS alone may be insufficient. Integrating additional therapeutic strategies or tailoring personalised treatment protocols may be necessary to optimise clinical outcomes. Future research should further explore the synergistic potential of rTMS combined with orexin receptor antagonists (ORAs), offering a novel, multimodal approach for managing depression with comorbid insomnia.

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Applications in the Study of Executive Functions: A Review

PURPOSE

Executive functions (EFs) are a set of advanced cognitive functions essential for human survival and behavioral regulation. Understanding neurophysiological mechanisms of EFs as well as exploring methods to enhance them are still challenging problems in cognitive neuroscience. In recent years, transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has been widely used in the field of EF research and has made notable progress. This article aimed to discuss the impact of TMS technology on EF research from both basic and applied research perspectives.

METHODS

We searched for literature on TMS and EFs published in the last decade (2013-2023) and reviewed how TMS has been applied in the field of EF.

FINDINGS

We found that the combination of TMS with neuroimaging techniques was helpful in exploring the brain mechanisms of EFs and investigating the executive dysfunctions caused by other neuropsychiatric disorders. Moreover, TMS could be considered as one of the most important techniques to enhance EFs among patient populations, even healthy people, with high safety and credibility. Meanwhile, we discussed the application of TMS in the research of EFs and made suggestions for future research directions. We suggested that a multidisciplinary structure of methods such as epigenetics and endocrinology could be integrated with TMS for investigating deeper in EF domains, and a substantial number of high-quality clinical studies are required to further elucidate the effects of TMS on EFs.

CONCLUSIONS

TMS holds great promise for gaining insight into investigating the neural mechanisms of EFs and improving executive functions among different populations.

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for post-traumatic stress disorder in adults

BACKGROUND

The estimated lifetime prevalence of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in adults worldwide has been estimated at 3.9%. PTSD appears to contribute to alterations in neuronal network connectivity patterns. Current pharmacological and psychotherapeutic treatments for PTSD are associated with inadequate symptom improvement and high dropout rates. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), a non-invasive therapy involving induction of electrical currents in cortical brain tissue, may be an important treatment option for PTSD to improve remission rates and for people who cannot tolerate existing treatments.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in adults.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Common Mental Disorders Controlled Trials Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, three other databases, and two clinical trials registers. We checked reference lists of relevant articles. The most recent search was January 2023.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the efficacy and safety of rTMS versus sham rTMS for PTSD in adults from any treatment setting, including veterans. Eligible trials employed at least five rTMS treatment sessions with both active and sham conditions. We included trials with combination interventions, where a pharmacological agent or psychotherapy was combined with rTMS for both intervention and control groups. We included studies meeting the above criteria regardless of whether they reported any of our outcomes of interest.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently extracted data and assessed the risk of bias in accordance with Cochrane standards. Primary outcomes were PTSD severity immediately after treatment and serious adverse events during active treatment. Secondary outcomes were PTSD remission, PTSD response, PTSD severity at two follow-up time points after treatment, dropouts, and depression and anxiety severity immediately after treatment.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 13 RCTs in the review (12 published; 1 unpublished dissertation), with 577 participants. Eight studies included stand-alone rTMS treatment, four combined rTMS with an evidence-based psychotherapeutic treatment, and one investigated rTMS as an adjunctive to treatment-as-usual. Five studies were conducted in the USA, and some predominantly included white, male veterans. Active rTMS probably makes little to no difference to PTSD severity immediately following treatment (standardized mean difference (SMD) -0.14, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.54 to 0.27; 3 studies, 99 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). We downgraded the certainty of evidence by one level for imprecision (sample size insufficient to detect a difference of medium effect size). We deemed one study as having a low risk of bias and the remaining two as having 'some concerns' for risk of bias. A sensitivity analysis of change-from-baseline scores enabled inclusion of a greater number of studies (6 studies, 252 participants). This analysis yielded a similar outcome to our main analysis but also indicated significant heterogeneity in efficacy across studies, including two studies with a high risk of bias. Reported rates of serious adverse events were low, with seven reported (active rTMS: 6; sham rTMS: 1). The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of active rTMS on serious adverse events (odds ratio (OR) 5.26, 95% CI 0.26 to 107.81; 5 studies, 251 participants; very low-certainty evidence [Active rTMS: 23/1000, sham rTMS: 4/1000]). We downgraded the evidence by one level for risk of bias and two levels for imprecision. We rated four of five studies as having a high risk of bias, and the fifth as 'some concerns' for bias. We were unable to assess PTSD remission immediately after treatment as none of the included studies reported this outcome.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Based on moderate-certainty evidence, our review suggests that active rTMS probably makes little to no difference to PTSD severity immediately following treatment compared to sham stimulation. However, significant heterogeneity in efficacy was detected when we included a larger number of studies in sensitivity analysis. We observed considerable variety in participant and protocol characteristics across studies included in this review. For example, studies tended to be weighted towards inclusion of either male veterans or female civilians. Studies varied greatly in terms of the proportion of the sample with comorbid depression. Study protocols differed in treatment design and stimulation parameters (e.g. session number/duration, treatment course length, stimulation intensity/frequency, location of stimulation). These differences may affect efficacy, particularly when considering interactions with participant factors. Reported rates of serious adverse events were very low (< 1%) across active and sham conditions. It is uncertain whether rTMS increases the risk of serious adverse event occurrence, as our certainty of evidence was very low. Studies frequently lacked clear definitions for serious adverse events, as well as detail on tracking/assessment of data and information on the safety population. Increased reporting on these elements would likely aid the advancement of both research and clinical recommendations of rTMS for PTSD. Currently, there is insufficient evidence to meta-analyze PTSD remission, PTSD treatment response, and PTSD severity at different periods post-treatment. Further research into these outcomes could inform the clinical use of rTMS. Additionally, the relatively large contribution of data from trials that focused on white male veterans may limit the generalizability of our conclusions. This could be addressed by prioritizing recruitment of more diverse participant samples.

Clinical Updates and Perspectives on Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS)

Since its introduction nearly 30 years ago, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) has increasingly been used to both provide novel insights into the pathophysiology of the neural circuitry that underlies neurological and psychiatric diseases and to manipulate neural activities in a non-invasive manner [...].

Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation-Induced Neuroplasticity and the Treatment of Psychiatric Disorders: State of the Evidence and Future Opportunities

Neuroplasticity, or activity-dependent neuronal change, is a crucial mechanism underlying the mechanisms of effect of many therapies for neuropsychiatric disorders, one of which is repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS). Understanding the neuroplastic effects of rTMS at different biological scales and on different timescales and how the effects at different scales interact with each other can help us understand the effects of rTMS in clinical populations and offers the potential to improve treatment outcomes. Several decades of research in the fields of neuroimaging and blood biomarkers is increasingly showing its clinical relevance, allowing measurement of the synaptic, functional, and structural changes involved in neuroplasticity in humans. In this narrative review, we describe the evidence for rTMS-induced neuroplasticity at multiple levels of the nervous system, with a focus on the treatment of psychiatric disorders. We also describe the relationship between neuroplasticity and clinical effects, discuss methods to optimize neuroplasticity, and identify future research opportunities in this area.

Effect of high-frequency (5Hz) rTMS stimulating left DLPFC combined with galantamine on cognitive impairment after ischemic stroke and serum homocysteine and neuron-specific enolase

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the efficacy of high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (HF-rTMS) combined with galantamine in patients with cognitive impairment after stroke and its effect on serum homocysteine (Hcy) and neuron-specific enolase (NSE) levels.

METHODS

A total of 90 patients with cognitive impairment after the first ischemic stroke were enrolled. They were randomly divided into rTMS+ cognitive rehabilitation group, Galantamine + cognitive rehabilitation group, and rTMS+ Galantamine + cognitive rehabilitation group. All groups received routine medical treatment and limb rehabilitation treatment. The rTMS stimulation site was the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (left DLPFC), the magnetic stimulation frequency was 5 Hz, the magnetic stimulation intensity was 80% of the motor threshold level, and 3,000 pulses were given every day. The Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), Fugl-Meyer scale, and modified Barthel index, as well as rehabilitation scale and serum NSE and Hcy were evaluated before and after treatment (after 4 weeks).

RESULTS

After 4 weeks of treatment, the scores of MMSE, MoCa scale, Fugl-Meyer scale, and modified Barthel index in the three groups were significantly higher than those before treatment (all p < 0.05), while the serum NSE and Hcy levels of the three groups were decreased. rTMS+ Galantamine + cognitive rehabilitation group had higher scale scores, and the difference between the three groups was statistically significant compared with the other two groups (all p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Cognitive rehabilitation combined with HF-rTMS and galantamine could improve the cognitive function of patients to the greatest extent, promote the recovery of physical activity, improve the self-care ability of daily life, and effectively reduce the serum HCY and NSE levels in patients with cognitive impairment after stroke. No randomized controlled trials of similar combination treatments have been reported. The better therapeutic effect may be related to the fact that galantamine combined with repetitive transcranial magnetism can activate the brain cholinergic system more extensively, promote brain neural remodeling through long-term potentiation and inhibit local neuroinflammatory responses in brain injury.

Effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with cognitive training on cognitive function in patients with Alzheimer's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Purpose

To evaluate the effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) paired with cognitive training on cognitive function in Alzheimer's Disease (AD) patients.

Methods

PubMed, The Cochrane Library, Embase, CINAHL Complete (EBSCO), China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) and WanFang Database were searched. The risk of bias was appraised through the Cochrane collaboration tool. A meta-analysis was conducted, including an assessment of heterogeneity.

Results

Ten studies comprising 408 participants were included. The addition of rTMS significantly improved overall cognition in patients compared with cognitive intervention alone (p < 0.05 for all tests). The treatment also had some continuity, with significant improvements in cognitive function within weeks after the treatment ended (p < 0.05 for all tests).

Conclusion

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with cognitive training (rTMS-CT) is a valuable technique for the cognitive rehabilitation of AD patients. It is beneficial to improve the cognitive ability of patients and restore their overall functional state. The results of the study may provide a basis for clinical providers to implement interventions that facilitate the design of more rigorous and high-quality interventions.

Limitations

The number of studies and sample size in our study were small. We did not explore possible interactions between rTMS and medications and mood improvement after rTMS due to inadequate data.

Systematic review registration

This study was registered on PROSPERO with registration number CRD42023405615.

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for the Treatment of Gambling Disorder: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Gambling Disorder (GD) is a behavioral addiction listed within the diagnostic category of substance-related and addictive disorders. Recently, transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), which non-invasively stimulates the brain and has neuromodulatory properties, has emerged as an innovative treatment tool for GD, thus offering a new option for the management of this complex disorder. The present review explored the efficacy of TMS as a possible non-pharmacological treatment for GD.

METHODS

An exhaustive search was performed across the MEDLINE, Web of Science, and EMBASE databases using a specific search string related to GD and TMS. A total of 20 papers were selected for full-text examination, out of which eight fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were therefore systematically analyzed in the present review.

RESULTS

This review included eight studies: three randomized-controlled trials (RCTs), three non-controlled studies, one case series, and one case report. Two cross-over RCTs described a decrease in craving after high-frequency (excitatory), repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and the medial prefrontal cortex (PFC), respectively; another study applying low-frequency (inhibitory) rTMS on the right DLPFC did not find any positive effect on craving. Among uncontrolled studies, one demonstrated the beneficial effect of high-frequency rTMS over the left DLPFC, while another showed the efficacy of a continuous theta burst stimulation protocol directed over the pre-supplementary motor area, bilaterally.

CONCLUSION

The included studies showed the promising effect of excitatory stimulation over the left PFC. However, further investigation is needed, particularly in terms of standardizing stimulation protocols and psychometric assessments.