Quantitative Computed Tomography Lung COVID Scores with Laboratory Markers: Utilization to Predict Rapid Progression and Monitor Longitudinal Changes in Patients with Coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) Pneumonia

Prognostic implications of regional lung impairment evaluation in quantitative computed tomography imaging of COVID-19

AIM

To enhance the understanding of COVID-19 regional lung damage pattern by analyzing the organ in subregions, beyond the typical lobe segmentation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study used semiautomatic computed tomography (CT) imaging segmentation and quantification to investigate regional lung impairments in patients with COVID-19. Each lung was divided into 12 regions, and the anatomical impairments obtained from the CT image (emphysema, ground glass opacity, and collapsed tissue) were quantified. Then, the results for every region were correlated with clinical outcomes. This research encompassed 333 individuals, both COVID positive (n = 190) and COVID negative (n = 143), whose medical reports were checked for the need for ventilatory support and outcome (cure or deceased).

RESULTS

Findings indicate a strong association between the extent of lung damage and COVID-19 diagnosis, the level of ventilatory assistance required, and patient survival rates. Notably, the medial posterior lung region exhibited increased opacities and collapse in COVID-positive patients (p < 0.05), particularly those requiring invasive ventilation or who succumbed to the illness.

CONCLUSION

The results expand the knowledge of COVID-19 regional impact beyond typical lobe segmentation and indicate that COVID-19 impairments in the lungs are localized. The most affected region identified was the medial posterior of both right and left lungs. Early detection of quantifiable lung damage can serve as a valuable prognostic tool, helping to pinpoint patients at heightened risk of severe complications or mortality.

Regulatory T Cell Phenotype Related to Cytokine Expression Patterns in Post-COVID-19 Pulmonary Fibrosis and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis

BACKGROUND

Post-coronavirus disease 19 lung fibrosis (PCLF) shares common immunological abnormalities with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), characterized by an unbalanced cytokine profile being associated with the development of lung fibrosis. The aim of the present study was to analyze and compare the different subsets of CD4- and CD8-T cells, along with specific cytokine expression patterns, in peripheral blood (PB) from patients affected by PCLF and IPF and healthy controls (HCs).

METHODS

One-hundred patients followed at the Rare Lung Disease Center of Siena University Hospital were enrolled. Eight HCs were recruited. PB samples were collected, and CD4- and CD8-T subsets were analyzed through flow cytometry. Multiplex bead-based LEGENDplex™ were used for cytokine quantification.

RESULTS

Higher CD8 percentages were observed in IPF than in HCs and PCLF (p = 0.020 and p = 0.007, respectively). PCLF subgroup showed higher Th-naïve, Th-effector, Tc-naïve, and Tc-reg percentages than IPF (p < 0.001; p = 0.018; p = 0.005; p = 0.017, respectively). Th-naïve and Tc-naïve inversely correlated with Tc-reg (p < 0.0001, r = -0.61 and p = 0.005, r = -0.39, respectively). Tc-naïve-PD1 and Tc-effector-PD1 percentages were higher in PCLF than IPF (p < 0.001), while Tfh-reg and Tfc-reg were significantly higher in IPF than PCLF (p < 0.001). IL-4, IL-2, TNF-α, and IL-17A were more expressed in PCLF than IPF (p < 0.001). IL-8 directly correlated with Tc-naïve percentages in PCLF (p = 0.018, r = 0.35).

CONCLUSION

A variety of immune cells is involved in the development and progression of pulmonary fibrosis confirming an immunological similarity between IPF and PCLF. T-reg cells play a key role in the worsening of the disease. High cytokine values showed a pro-fibrotic environment in PCLF patients, suggesting dysregulation of the immune system of these patients. Moreover, the immunological similarity between IPF and PCLF patients suggests that SARS-CoV2 infection may trigger the activation of biological pathways common with IPF.

Surviving COVID-19 and Battling Fibrosis: A Retrospective Cohort Study Across Three Pandemic Waves

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

We aimed to characterize the fibrosis following COVID-19 pneumonia, using quantitative analysis, after three months and subsequently, after two years of patients' release from the hospital, and to identify the risk factors for pulmonary fibrosis.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective, observational cohort study on 420 patients with severe forms of COVID-19. For all patients, we registered demographic, inflammatory and biochemical parameters, complete blood count and D-dimers; all patients underwent three computed tomography scans (at admittance, at 3 months and at 2 years).

RESULTS

We found fibrosis in 67.9% of patients at the 3-month evaluation and in 42.4% of patients at the 2-year evaluation, registering a significant decrease in the severe and moderate fibrosis cases, with a slight increase in the mild fibrosis cases. The risk of fibrosis was found to be proportional to the values of age, duration of hospital stay, inflammatory markers (ESR, fibrinogen), cytolytic markers (LDH, AST) and D-dimers. The highest correlations with lung fibrosis were registered for interstitial pulmonary involvement (for the 3-month evaluation) and total pulmonary involvement (for the 2-year evaluation).

CONCLUSIONS

Lung fibrosis represents a significant post-COVID-19 complication found in 42% of patients with severe forms of pneumonia at the 2-year evaluation. A significant overall decrease in the severity of lung fibrosis was registered at the 2-year evaluation compared to the 3-month evaluation. We consider that the amount of interstitial pulmonary involvement represents the optimal parameter to estimate the risk of lung fibrosis following SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia.

Relationship between high-resolution computed tomography quantitative imaging analysis and physiological and clinical features in antisynthetase syndrome-related interstitial lung disease

OBJECTIVES

To explore the association between the extent of CT abnormalities by quantitative imaging analysis (QIA) and clinical/physiological disease parameters in patients with antisynthetase syndrome associated interstitial lung disease (ARS-ILD).

METHODS

We analysed 20 patients with antisynthetase antibodies and active ILD enrolled in the Abatacept in Myositis-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease study. High-resolution chest CT was obtained at weeks 0, 24 and 48 and QIA scored the extent of ground glass (quantitative score for ground glass), fibrosis (quantitative score for lung fibrosis, QLF) and total ILD (quantitative ILD, QILD). Mixed-effects models estimated longitudinal QIA scores over time. Associations between QIA scores with clinical/physiological parameters were analysed longitudinally using repeated-measures mixed-effects models.

RESULTS

Patients were median age 57 years, 55% males and 85% white. Higher (worse) baseline QIA scores correlated with lower baseline forced vital capacity (FVC) and diffusing capacity adjusted for haemoglobin (DLCO). Longitudinal QIA trajectories trended towards improving scores during the trial, and patients on O2 at baseline had worsening QIA trajectories which were different from patients who were not on O2. Longitudinal QIA scores demonstrated strong associations with both FVC and DLCO over time. Higher QILD scores over time were also associated with worse dyspnoea scores, pulmonary visual analogue scale, physician and patient global disease activity, health status in 6/8 domains of the Short Form-36 and higher oxygen requirements. Patients with significant radiographic improvement at 48 weeks had higher baseline QLF, QILD and worse DLCO.

CONCLUSIONS

Longitudinal QIA scores associate with lung physiology, patient perception of respiratory status, overall disease activity and quality of life over time in ARS-ILD. QIA may allow reproducible monitoring of disease progression and response to therapy over time.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT03215927.

Management of COVID-19 Infection Associated Lung Abscess with Secondary Pleural Empyema Using Percutaneous Intracavitary Drainage: Case Series and Review of the Literature

Background/Objectives: COVID-19-related pulmonary complications, such as lung abscesses and pleural empyema, are rare but serious. This study presents a case series of three patients with COVID-19-associated lung abscesses complicated by pleural empyema, managed conservatively with percutaneous intracavitary drainage (ICD) and lavage. We assess the efficacy and safety of this treatment and compare our findings with the current literature. Methods: A retrospective analysis of three cases treated at the Clinic of Thoracic Surgery and Intensive Care Unit in Cluj-Napoca, Romania, was conducted. All patients developed severe lung involvement post-COVID-19, with abscesses rupturing into the pleural cavity. Conservative management included percutaneous ICD and daily lavage with isotonic saline, avoiding extensive surgery due to the patients' critical condition. Clinical, radiological, and functional outcomes were followed, and results were compared to similar cases in the literature. Results: Among 496 critically ill patients with COVID-19 infection, three patients (age 42-60) developed lung abscesses and bacterial superinfection. In all patients, the germs involved were identified (monomicrobial infection in 1, polymicrobial in 2 patients). The abscesses were treated with percutaneous ICD and lavage, leading to clinical improvement in all cases. Long-term drainage (94-290 days) was necessary to obtain healing, and none of the patients required lung resection or decortication. Serial CT scans showed resolution of the abscesses and empyema. All were successfully discharged, and long-term follow-up (30-32 months) revealed minor radiological sequelae and mild respiratory impairment. The literature review found three studies summarizing 45 patients with lung abscesses complicating COVID-19 infections, but only one study addressed the use of percutaneous ICD. The mortality reported in this group was high (50-65%). Conclusions: Conservative treatment with percutaneous ICD and lavage is effective in managing lung abscesses and pleural empyema in critically ill COVID-19 patients, offering a viable alternative to surgery in high-risk cases. This method may be beneficial in multidisciplinary care for non-surgical candidates.

Impact of COVID-19 on Diaphragmatic Function: Understanding Multiorgan Involvement and Long-Term Consequences

The COVID-19 pandemic has brought significant attention to the respiratory system, with much focus on lung-related disorders. However, the diaphragm, a crucial component of respiratory physiology, has not been adequately studied, especially in the context of long COVID. This review explores the multipotential role of the diaphragm in both respiratory health and disease, emphasizing its involvement in long-term complications following SARS-CoV-2 infection. The diaphragm's fundamental role in respiratory physiology and its impact on balance and posture control, breathing patterns, and autonomic nervous system regulation are discussed. This review examines complications arising from COVID-19, highlighting the diaphragm's involvement in neurological, musculoskeletal, and inflammatory responses. Particular attention is given to the neuroinvasive impact of SARS-CoV-2, the inflammatory response, and the direct viral effects on the diaphragm. The diaphragm's role in long COVID is explored, with a focus on specific symptoms such as voice disorders, pelvic floor dysfunction, and sleep disturbances. Diagnostic challenges, current methods for assessing diaphragmatic dysfunction, and the complexities of differentiating it from other conditions are also explored. This article is the first to comprehensively address diaphragmatic dysfunction resulting from COVID-19 and long COVID across various physiological and pathological aspects, offering a new perspective on its diagnosis and treatment within a multisystem context.

The Ambivalence of Post COVID-19 Vaccination Responses in Humans

The Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), has prompted a massive global vaccination campaign, leading to the rapid development and deployment of several vaccines. Various COVID-19 vaccines are under different phases of clinical trials and include the whole virus or its parts like DNA, mRNA, or protein subunits administered directly or through vectors. Beginning in 2020, a few mRNA (Pfizer-BioNTech BNT162b2 and Moderna mRNA-1273) and adenovirus-based (AstraZeneca ChAdOx1-S and the Janssen Ad26.COV2.S) vaccines were recommended by WHO for emergency use before the completion of the phase 3 and 4 trials. These vaccines were mostly administered in two or three doses at a defined frequency between the two doses. While these vaccines, mainly based on viral nucleic acids or protein conferred protection against the progression of SARS-CoV-2 infection into severe COVID-19, and prevented death due to the disease, their use has also been accompanied by a plethora of side effects. Common side effects include localized reactions such as pain at the injection site, as well as systemic reactions like fever, fatigue, and headache. These symptoms are generally mild to moderate and resolve within a few days. However, rare but more serious side effects have been reported, including allergic reactions such as anaphylaxis and, in some cases, myocarditis or pericarditis, particularly in younger males. Ongoing surveillance and research efforts continue to refine the understanding of these adverse effects, providing critical insights into the risk-benefit profile of COVID-19 vaccines. Nonetheless, the overall safety profile supports the continued use of these vaccines in combating the pandemic, with regulatory agencies and health organizations emphasizing the importance of vaccination in preventing COVID-19's severe outcomes. In this review, we describe different types of COVID-19 vaccines and summarize various adverse effects due to autoimmune and inflammatory response(s) manifesting predominantly as cardiac, hematological, neurological, and psychological dysfunctions. The incidence, clinical presentation, risk factors, diagnosis, and management of different adverse effects and possible mechanisms contributing to these effects are discussed. The review highlights the potential ambivalence of human response post-COVID-19 vaccination and necessitates the need to mitigate the adverse side effects.

Predicting Survival Status in COVID-19 Patients: Machine Learning Models Development with Ventilator-Related and Biochemical Parameters from Early Stages: A Pilot Study

Objective: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) can cause intubation and ventilatory support due to respiratory failure, and extubation failure increases mortality risk. This study, therefore, aimed to explore the feasibility of using specific biochemical and ventilator parameters to predict survival status among COVID-19 patients by using machine learning. Methods: This study included COVID-19 patients from Taipei Medical University-affiliated hospitals from May 2021 to May 2022. Sequential data on specific biochemical and ventilator parameters from days 0-2, 3-5, and 6-7 were analyzed to explore differences between the surviving (successfully weaned off the ventilator) and non-surviving groups. These data were further used to establish separate survival prediction models using random forest (RF). Results: The surviving group exhibited significantly lower mean C-reactive protein (CRP) levels and mean potential of hydrogen ions levels (pH) levels on days 0-2 compared to the non-surviving group (CRP: non-surviving group: 13.16 ± 5.15 ng/mL, surviving group: 10.23 ± 5.15 ng/mL; pH: non-surviving group: 7.32 ± 0.07, survival group: 7.37 ± 0.07). Regarding the survival prediction performanace, the RF model trained solely with data from days 0-2 outperformed models trained with data from days 3-5 and 6-7. Subsequently, CRP, the partial pressure of carbon dioxide in arterial blood (PaCO2), pH, and the arterial oxygen partial pressure to fractional inspired oxygen (P/F) ratio served as primary indicators in survival prediction in the day 0-2 model. Conclusions: The present developed models confirmed that early biochemical and ventilatory parameters-specifically, CRP levels, pH, PaCO2, and P/F ratio-were key predictors of survival for COVID-19 patients. Assessed during the initial two days, these indicators effectively predicted the likelihood of successful weaning of from ventilators, emphasizing their importance in early management and improved outcomes in COVID-19-related respiratory failure.

Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Lifestyle Behavior and Clinical Care Pathway Management in Type 2 Diabetes: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study

Background and Objectives: In Italy, as in the rest of the world, government restrictions aimed at containing the spread of COVID-19 primarily imposed limitations on social relationships and personal behavior. This situation significantly affected the management of chronic illnesses, including type 2 diabetes (T2D). The objective was to evaluate the perceptions of patients with T2D regarding the quality of care received during the COVID-19 pandemic and the impact on dietary and physical activity behaviors. Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional survey. Data were collected from June to July 2023 using the convenience sampling of patients with T2D, and the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC) and Medi-Lite questionnaires were administered. Results: During the research period, out of the 130 subjects who met all enrollment criteria, 103 patients were included in this study (79.23%). The results of the administered questionnaires were heterogeneous. The average scores from the PACIC Questionnaire for each question displayed significant variability, indicating a range of experiences in the quality of care. In the Medi-Lite survey, fruit, cereals, and olive oil showed the highest adherence levels, with mean scores ranging from 2.58 (SD ± 1.18) for fruit to 1.89 (SD ± 0.34) for olive oil and 1.97 (SD ± 0.17) for cereals. Patients who reported increased food intake during the lockdown attributed it to having more time to prepare meals. Physical activity levels remained unchanged for 48 patients, decreased for 45 patients, and only 9 patients managed to exercise more during the COVID-19 restrictions. Conclusions: Healthcare systems must prioritize comprehensive care plans for T2D that address not only physical health, but also emotional and social well-being. Post-pandemic, promoting healthier lifestyles and empowering patients to manage their condition is crucial. A multidisciplinary and multidimensional approach could support the care of vulnerable individuals, such as patients with T2D, especially during crises like pandemics or other dramatic events.

Glycyrrhetinic acid blocks SARS-CoV-2 infection by activating the cGAS-STING signalling pathway

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) played an important role in controlling the COVID-19 pandemic, but the scientific basis and its active ingredients are still weakly studied. This study aims to decipher the underlying anti-SARS-CoV-2 mechanisms of glycyrrhetinic acid (GA).

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

GA's anti-SARS-CoV-2 effect was verified both in vitro and in vivo. Homogeneous time-resolved fluorescence assays, biolayer interferometry technology, and molecular docking were employed to examine interactions of GA with human stimulator of interferon genes (hSTING). Immunofluorescence staining, western blot, and RT-qPCR were used to investigate nuclear translocation of interferon regulatory factor 3 (IRF3) and levels of STING target genes. Pharmacokinetics of GA was studied in mice.

KEY RESULTS

GA could directly bind to Ser162 and Tyr240 residues of hSTING, thus up-regulating downstream targets and activation of the STING signalling pathway. Such activation is crucial for limiting the replication of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron in Calu-3 cells and protecting against lung injury induced by SARS-CoV-2 Omicron infection in K18-ACE2 transgenic mice. Immunofluorescence staining and western blot indicated that GA increased levels of phosphorylated STING, phosphorylated TANK-binding kinase-1, and cyclic GMP-AMP synthase (cGAS). Importantly, GA increased nuclear translocation of IRF3. Pharmacokinetic analysis of GA in mice indicated it can be absorbed into circulation and detected in the lung at a stable level.

CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS

Activation of the cGAS-STING pathway through the GA-STING-IRF3 axis is essential for the antiviral activity of GA in mice, providing new insights into the potential translation of GA for treating SARS-CoV-2 in patients.

Non-Conventional Prognostic Markers in Life-Threatening COVID-19 Cases-When Less Is More

Background/Objectives: In this study, we aimed to compare the predictive power of non-conventional (neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio-NLR; platelet/lymphocyte ratio-PLR) and conventional markers (C-reactive protein-CRP; procalcitonin-PCT; interleukin-6-IL-6) in terms of disease progression and mortality in severe SARS-CoV-2 patients. Methods: In this prospective observatory study, blood samples were collected daily, focusing on the established inflammatory markers. Critically ill COVID-19 patients who required ICU admission were included. Patient treatment followed established COVID-19 protocols, and the data analysis was performed using SPSS with non-normal distribution methods. The study cohort primarily included patients infected with the delta variant. Results: A mortality rate of 76.6% was observed among 167 patients during the study period. Significant differences in conventional and non-conventional markers between survivor and non-survivor groups were observed. The PCT levels were significantly elevated (p < 0.005) in the deceased group. Among the non-conventional markers, the NLR was consistently higher in non-survivors and emerged as a significant predictor of mortality, whereas the PLR was not elevated among the non-survivors. ROC analyses indicated that PCT and the NLR were the markers with the highest predictive power for mortality. The multivariate logistic regression analysis identified NLR, PCT, CRP, and IL-6 as significant predictors of mortality across different days. The NLR showed a consistent, though not always statistically significant, association with increased mortality risk, particularly on Days 2 and 5. Conclusions: The NLR's accessibility and simplicity of determination make it a valuable and practical tool for monitoring inflammatory processes in viral infections. Our findings suggest that incorporating NLR analysis into routine clinical practice could enhance the early identification of high-risk patients, thereby improving patient management and outcomes.

Using the sympathetic system, beta blockers and alpha-2 agonists, to address acute respiratory distress syndrome

Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) manifests as an acute inflammatory lung injury characterized by persistent hypoxemia, featuring a swift onset, high mortality, and predominantly supportive care as the current therapeutic approach, while effective treatments remain an area of active investigation. Adrenergic receptors (AR) play a pivotal role as stress hormone receptors, extensively participating in various inflammatory processes by initiating downstream signaling pathways. Advancements in molecular biology and pharmacology continually unveil the physiological significance of distinct AR subtypes. Interventions targeting these subtypes have the potential to induce specific alterations in cellular and organismal functions, presenting a promising avenue as a therapeutic target for managing ARDS. This article elucidates the pathogenesis of ARDS and the basic structure and function of AR. It also explores the relationship between AR and ARDS from the perspective of different AR subtypes, aiming to provide new insights for the improvement of ARDS.

IgA Anti-β2-Glycoprotein I Antibodies as Markers of Thrombosis and Severity in COVID-19 Patients

Patients with COVID-19 may develop a hypercoagulable state due to tissue and endothelial injury, produced by an unbalanced immune response. Therefore, an increased number of thromboembolic events has been reported in these patients. The aim of this study is to investigate the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) in COVID-19 patients, their role in the development of thrombosis and their relationship with the severity of the disease. In this retrospective study, serum samples from 159 COVID-19 patients and 80 healthy donors were analysed for the presence of aPL. A total of 29 patients (18.2%) and 14 healthy donors (17.5%) were positive for aPL. Nineteen COVID-19 patients (12%) but no healthy donor presented a positive percentage of the IgA isotype aPL. IgA anti-β2-glycoprotein I antibodies (anti-β2GPI) were the most frequent type (6.3%) in patients but was not detected in any healthy donor. The positivity of this antibody was found to be significantly elevated in patients with thromboembolic events (25% vs. 5%, p = 0.029); in fact, patients with positive IgA anti-β2GPI had an incidence of thrombosis over six times higher than those who had normal antibody concentrations [OR (CI 95%) of 6.67 (1.5-30.2), p = 0.014]. Additionally, patients with moderate-severe disease presented a higher aPL positivity than patients with mild disease according to the Brescia (p = 0.029) and CURB-65 (p = 0.011) severity scales. A multivariate analysis showed that positivity for IgA anti-β2GPI is significantly associated with disease severity measured by CURB-65 [OR (CI 95%) 17.8 (1.7-187), p = 0.0016]. In conclusion, COVID-19 patients have a significantly higher positive percentage of the IgA isotype aPL than healthy donors. IgA anti-β2GPI antibodies were the most frequently detected aPL in COVID-19 patients and were associated with thrombosis and severe COVID-19 and are thus proposed as a possible marker to identify high-risk patients.

Potential Protective Factors for Allergic Rhinitis Patients Infected with COVID-19

At the beginning of the 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic, airway allergic diseases such as asthma and allergic rhinitis (AR) were considered as risk factors for COVID-19, as they would aggravate symptoms. With further research, more and more literature has shown that airway allergic disease may not be a high-risk factor, but may be a protective factor for COVID-19 infection, which is closely related to its low-level expression of the ACE2 receptor and the complex cytokines network as underlying molecular regulatory mechanisms. In addition, steroid hormones and age factors could not be ignored. In this review, we have summarized some current evidence on the relationship between COVID-19 and allergic rhinitis to highlight the underlying mechanisms of COVID-19 infection and provide novel insights for its prevention and treatment. The key findings show that allergic rhinitis and its related molecular mechanisms may have a protective effect against COVID-19 infection.

Effect of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Respiratory Diseases and Their Economic Impacts

COVID-19 is an airborne respiratory disease that mainly affects the lungs. To date, COVID-19 has infected 580 million people with a mortality of approximately 7 million people worldwide. The emergence of COVID-19 has also affected the infectivity, diagnosis, and disease outcomes of existing diseases such as influenza, TB, and asthma in human populations. These are airborne respiratory diseases with symptoms and mode of transmission similar to those of COVID-19. It was speculated that the protracted nature of the COVID-19 pandemic coupled with vaccination could impact other respiratory diseases and mortality. In this study, we analyzed the impact of COVID-19 on flu, tuberculosis (TB), and asthma. Our analyses suggest that COVID-19 has a potential impact on the mortality of flu, TB, and asthma. These impacts vary across before the COVID-19 era, during the peak period of the pandemic, and after vaccinations/preventive measures were implemented, as well as across different regions of the world. Overall, the spread of flu generally reduced during the pandemic, resulting in a reduced expenditure on flu-related hospitalizations, although there were sporadic spikes at setting times. In contrast, TB deaths generally increased perhaps due to the disruption in access to TB services and reduction in resources. Asthma deaths, on the other hand, only marginally varied. Collectively, the emergence of COVID-19 added extra cost to the overall expenditure on some respiratory infectious diseases, while the cost for other infectious diseases was either reduced or somewhat unaffected.

Investigation of Serum Endocan Levels in SARS-CoV-2 Patients

Endocan is an endothelial-cell-specific proteoglycan (ESM-1) and has emerged as an endothelial dysfunction and inflammatory marker in recent years. Endocan can be used as a marker of inflammatory endothelial dysfunction in endothelium-dependent disease: cardiovascular disease, sepsis, lung and kidney disease and malignancies. Recent data suggest that endothelial dysfunction is a key mechanism in COVID-19 pathogenesis. Endotheliitis and thrombo-inflammation are associated with severe forms of SARS-CoV-2 infection, and endocan is currently under investigation as a potential diagnostic and prognostic marker. The aim of this study was to determine serum endocan levels in patients with COVID-19 to evaluate the correlation between endocan levels and clinical disease diagnosis and prognosis. This study enrolled 56 patients, divided into three groups depending on disease severity: mild (15), moderate (25) and severe (16). The biochemical, demographic, clinical and imagistic data were collected and evaluated in correlation with the endocan levels. Serum endocan levels were significantly higher in the COVID-19 patients compared to the control group; also, endocan concentration correlated with vaccination status. The results revealed significantly elevated serum endocan levels in COVID-19 patients compared to the control group, with a correlation observed between endocan concentration and vaccination status. These findings suggest that endocan may serve as a novel biomarker for detecting inflammation and endothelial dysfunction risk in COVID-19 patients. There was no significant relationship between serum endocan levels and disease severity or the presence of cardiovascular diseases. Endocan can be considered a novel biomarker for the detection of inflammation and endothelial dysfunction risk in COVID-19 patients.