The Role of Photodynamic Therapy in the Treatment of Vulvar Intraepithelial Neoplasia

The application of photodynamic therapy in recurrent genital herpes

BACKGROUND

Frequently, recurrence of genital herpes imposes significant physical and psychological burdens on patients, and existing treatments are often ineffective in preventing recurrence. Previous studies have indicated that photodynamic therapy (PDT) showed promising outcomes in the treatment of labial herpes simplex virus (HSV) infections; however, its efficacy for genital herpes remained unclear.

METHOD

The study screened patients with genital herpes at Daping Hospital from July 2020 to May 2024. Patients were divided into two groups based on whether they received PDT treatment. Over a one-year follow-up period, patients' healing time and recurrence rates were compared between the two groups. The cumulative incidence of recurrence and restricted mean survival time (RMST) were used to assess outcomes. Propensity score matching (PSM) was employed to minimize bias.

RESULT

A total of 41 patients enrolled in our study, with 8 (19.5 %) received PDT. The non-PDT group exhibited a slower skin lesion healing time, averaging at 7.2 days compared to 5.4 days in the PDT group. A significant difference was observed in the cumulative incidence of recurrence between the PDT and non-PDT groups (37.5 % versus 71.4 %) after PSM. The RMST in the PDT group was 9.94 days, compared to 5.13 days in the non-PDT group before PSM, and 4.14 after PSM.

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrated that the PDT effectively reduced lesion recovery time and delayed recurrences of genital herpes. We recommend considering PDT as a potential treatment option for patients with recurrent genital herpes.

Therapeutic effects of focused ultrasound on vulvar squamous intraepithelial lesions in rat

OBJECTIVE

In this study, we established a Sprague-Dawley rat model of vulvar squamous intraepithelial lesions and investigated the impact of focused ultrasound on the expression of hypoxia-inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and mutant type p53 (mtp53) in the vulvar skin of rats with low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The vulvar skin of 60 rats was treated with dimethylbenzanthracene (DMBA) and mechanical irritation three times a week for 14 weeks. Rats with LSIL were randomly allocated into the experimental group or the control group. The experimental group was treated with focused ultrasound, while the control group received sham treatment.

RESULTS

After 14 weeks treatment of DMBA combined with mechanical irritation, LSIL were observed in 44 (73.33%) rats, and high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) were observed in 14 (23.33%) rats. 90.91% (20/22) of rats showed normal pathology and 9.09% (2/22) of rats exhibited LSIL in the experimental group at four weeks after focused ultrasound treatment. 22.73% (5/22) of rats exhibited LSIL, 77.27% (17/22) of rats progressed to HSIL in the control group. Compared with the control-group rats, the levels of HIF-1α, VEGF and mtp53 were significantly decreased in experimental-group rats (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that DMBA combined with mechanical irritation can induce vulvar squamous intraepithelial lesion in SD rats. Focused ultrasound can treat LSIL safely and effectively, prevent the progression of vulvar lesions, and improve the microenvironment of vulvar tissues by decreasing the localized expression of HIF-1α, VEGF, and mtp53 in rats.

Comparative study of topical 5-aminolevulinic acid photodynamic therapy and surgery for the treatment of vulvar squamous intraepithelial lesion

BACKGROUND

Vulvar squamous intraepithelial lesion (SIL) is a precursor lesion of vulvar squamous cell carcinoma. The current clinical treatments for vulvar SIL cause damage to the vulvar structure, chronic pain and psychological distress. Topical 5-aminolevulinic acid photodynamic therapy (ALA-PDT) is a novel, non-invasive therapy for intraepithelial lesions. The objective of this study was to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of ALA-PDT with local surgical resection for vulvar SIL.

METHODS

A total of 56 patients with vulvar SIL were enrolled in this retrospective study. Among them, 16 patients received local resection and 40 patients received ALA-PDT. HPV genotyping and ThinPrep cytologic test (TCT) were used to evaluate treatment efficacy. In addition, colposcopy-directed biopsy was performed in all patients at 3-month follow-up and in patients with positive high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) and/or abnormal TCT results during the follow-up.

RESULTS

At 3-month follow-up and in HSIL group the complete remission (CR) rate of the ALA-PDT group and surgery group was 90.6% (29/32) and 87.5% (14/16) (P = 1.000), respectively. The HPV clearance rate of the ALA-PDT group and surgery group was 45.2% (14/31) and 43.8% (7/16) (P = 0.927), respectively. The average numbers of ALA-PDT treatments were 5.34 for HSIL patients and 4.88 for LSIL patients, respectively. The CR rate of HSIL patients and LSIL patients was 90.6% (29/32) and 75.0% (6/8) (P = 0.550), respectively. The HPV clearance rate of HSIL patients and LSIL patients was 45.2% (14/31) and 37.5% (3/8) (P = 1.000), respectively. The ALA-PDT group showed similar clinical efficacy and milder adverse effects compared with the surgical group.

CONCLUSION

ALA-PDT showed similar clinical efficacy as surgery in the treatment of vulvar SIL, but with milder adverse effects and maintaining the integrity of the vulvar structure.

Vulvar squamous intraepithelial neoplasia epithelial thickness in hairy and non-hairy sites: a single center experience from China

Introduction

A large-sample study focusing on VIN lesions of a more precise thickness is needed to help guide clinical treatment. This study aimed to investigate the depth of vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia (VIN) and involved skin appendages to provide evidence for laser surgery.

Methods

The study retrospectively enrolled and analyzed the clinical characteristics of VIN patients in the obstetrics and gynecology department of a university hospital between January 1, 2019 and December 30, 2021. The study further explored the thickness of epithelium and skin appendages of 285 women with low-grade VIN (VIN1) and 285 women with high-grade VIN (VIN2/3).

Results

The study included 1,139 (80%) VIN1 and 335 (20%) VIN2/3 cases. The VIN1 and VIN2/3 groups showed a significant difference in human papillomavirus infection (P<0.01) but not in cytology (P = 0.499). Most (89.90%, 1,325) cases occurred in one area of the vulva, whereas 10.11% were multifocal. VIN commonly occurred on the posterior fourchette (76.85%), labia majora (11.61%), and labia minora (9.92%). The VIN2/3 group reported a significantly higher positive rate for concurrent cervical and vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia (160 of 285) than the VIN1 group (321 of 953) (P=0.000). The involved epithelial thicknesses in VIN2/3 and VIN1 were 0.69 ± 0.44 and 0.49 ± 0.23 mm, respectively, both of which were greater than the corresponding noninvolved epithelial thickness (0.31 ± 0.19 and 0.32 ± 0.10 mm, P<0.001 and P<0.001, respectively). In cases of appendage involvement, the VIN thickness was 1.98 ± 0.64 mm.

Conclusions

VIN thickness was generally ≤1 mm for the superficial lesions in non-hairy areas. However, for lesions extending onto hairy areas, the thickness was approximately 3 mm, leading to the destruction of involved skin appendages.

Assessment of Vulvar Intraepithelial Neoplasia (VIN) Grades Based on Dermoscopic Features: A Diagnostic Study

INTRODUCTION

Vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia (VIN) is a vulvar skin lesion considered a precursor of vulvar squamous cell carcinoma. No characteristics have been discovered to date that allows us to differentiate between grades of VIN, such as correlating the thickness of involvement of the epithelium (VIN1, VIN2, and VIN3) to the dermoscopic pattern.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to correlate the clinical and dermoscopic features of VIN cases with histopathological findings, with the purpose of identifying dermoscopic characteristics that allow us to differentiate between different grades of VIN.

METHODS

A retrospective study of the clinical and dermoscopic characteristics of VINs was recruited. Clinical and dermoscopic characteristics, as well as histopathology data, were gathered from patients at two Dermatology Units in Italy during the period spanning from January 2020 to December 2021.

RESULTS

The study population consisted of 20 patients with a histologically confirmed diagnosis of VIN. The mean age of patients at the time of diagnosis was 55 years. At the dermoscopic level, VIN1 was characterized by a homogeneous erythematous area that completely involved the entire lesion, with a vascular pattern consisting of regular glomerular vessels. VIN3, was characterized by the presence of compact milky white areas that involved almost the entire lesion. VIN2 was characterized by the presence of non-compact white areas that allowed homogeneous erythematous areas to be seen transparently, without other distinguishing aspects.

CONCLUSIONS

Although a definitive diagnosis and grading of VIN remains confirmed only histopathologically, our study shows how dermoscopy may aid the differential diagnosis between the different grades of VIN; the presence of a compact milky white area that involves nearly the entire lesion should be interpreted as an alarming feature, while homogeneous erythematous areas or a glomerular vascular pattern are more typical of the first stage of this neoplasia.

Comparison of ALA-PDT and CO2 laser treatment of low-grade vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia with high-risk HPV infection: A non-randomized controlled pilot study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of 5-aminolevulinic acid-mediated photodynamic therapy (ALA-PDT) and CO2 laser therapy of low-grade vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia (VAIN1) combined with high-risk human papillomavirus (hr-HPV) infection.

METHODS

A total of 163 patients with VAIN1 and hr-HPV infection were divided into PDT Group (n = 83) and CO2 laser Group (n = 80). The PDT Group received six times of ALA-PDT treatments and the CO2 laser Group received once CO2 laser treatment. HPV types, cytology, colposcopy, and pathological examinations were carried out before and after treatment. The differences in HPV clearance rate, VAIN1 regression rate, and adverse reactions between the two groups were analyzed during 6-month follow-up.

RESULTS

The overall HPV clearance rate of the PDT Group was significantly higher than that of the CO2 laser Group (65.06% vs 38.75%, P = 0.0008) although similar result was obtained for 16/18-related HPV infection patients (54.55% vs 43.48%, P = 0.4578). The VAIN1 regression rate of the PDT Group was significantly higher than that of the CO2 laser Group (95.18% vs 83.75%, P = 0.0170). In patients ≥ 50 years old, ALA-PDT showed better HPV clearance rate and VAIN1 regression rate than CO2 laser therapy (P < 0.05). The adverse reactions in the PDT Group were significantly lower than that in the CO2 laser Group (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The efficacy of ALA-PDT appears better than CO2 laser for VAIN1 patients. However, the long-term effect of ALA-PDT for VAIN1 still needs to be explored. As a non-invasive treatment, ALA-PDT is a highly effective therapeutic procedure for VAIN1 with hr-HPV infection.

Vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia, grade III, treated with photodynamic therapy: A case report

Vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia (VIN) is a precancerous lesion on the vulvar epidermis that does not invade or metastasize to surrounding stroma; it manifests as atypical intraepithelial hyperplasia on the vulva. Most patients with VIN are diagnosed early, and treatment with standardised therapy often leads to complete regression of symptoms. The treatment of VIN is still a challenge for clinicians because, in most cases, surgery is destructive and risky. However, photodynamic therapy (PDT) was recommended as a new treatment for VIN. Herein, we report the case of a patient with a large-area high-grade VIN lesion complicated by human papillomavirus infection. The patient could not undergo surgical treatment. However, treatment with PDT was performed in our outpatient department. There was slight pain during the treatment after multi-point injection of micro-lidocaine (0.05 mL/dot) was given. No recurrence was noted after 13 months of follow-up. More importantly, scarring and other major side effects were not detected. Therefore, PDT can be a useful alternative treatment for patients with VIN with large lesions or multifocal high-grade VIN.

Mechanisms of Resistance to Photodynamic Therapy (PDT) in Vulvar Cancer

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a valuable treatment method for vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia (VIN). It allows for the treatment of a multifocal disease with minimal tissue destruction. 5-Aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) is the most commonly used prodrug, which is converted in the heme pathway to protoporphyrin IX (PpIX), an actual photosensitizer (PS). Unfortunately, not all patients treated with PDT undergo complete remission. The main cause of their failure is resistance to anticancer therapy. In many cancers, resistance to various anticancer treatments is correlated with increased activity of the DNA repair protein apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease 1 (APE1). Enhanced activity of drug pumps may also affect the effectiveness of therapy. To investigate whether multidrug resistance mechanisms underlie PDT resistance in VIN, porphyrins were isolated from sensitive and resistant vulvar cancer cells and their culture media. APE1 activity was measured, and survival assay after PDT combined with APE1 inhibitor was performed. Our results revealed that resistant cells accumulated and effluxed less porphyrins than sensitive cells, and in response to PDT, resistant cells increased APE1 activity. Moreover, PDT combined with inhibition of APE1 significantly decreased the survival of PDT-resistant cells. This means that resistance to PDT in vulvar cancer may be the result of alterations in the heme synthesis pathway. Moreover, increased APE1 activity may be essential for the repair of PDT-mediated DNA damage, and inhibition of APE1 activity may increase the efficacy of PDT.

CO2 laser colposcopic guided surgery for the see and treat management of VHSIL: a preliminary experience

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficiency of CO2 laser colposcopic guided surgery performed in an outpatient see and treat setting in the management of VHSIL. Women with a suspected diagnosis of VHSIL and no vulvoscopic suspicion of vSCC were enrolled. An electronic register of CO2 laser treatment was created where description of performing parameters (excision or ablation) was specified and personal history was recorded. Statistical analysis was performed by Fisher’s exact test. Relative risks (RR) of risk factor were calculated and expressed in odds. From September 2014 to September 2018, we enrolled a total of 63 patients who underwent CO2 laser procedure and had a minimum follow-up time of 2 years at Careggi University Hospital in Florence. Forty-eight (76.2%) patients underwent laser excision and 15 (23.8%) patients underwent ablative treatment without histological results. Undertreatment was performed in 3 cases (6.3%) with definitive histology of vSCC. Therapeutical appropriateness of CO2 laser excision was reached in 85.4% of the cases (41/48). No volunteer loss to follow-up was registered; thus, fidelity to treatment was assess at 100%. Recurrence rate within 2 years attested in 8/60 followed patients (13.3%). No personal factor was found to influence the VHSIL course. CO2 laser excision may represent an excellent therapeutic option to VHSIL because it provides adequate oncological purpose with good cosmetic and functional results and high patients’ loyalty to treatment. An expert team could allow to undergo patients with VHSIL suspicion to unique diagnostic and therapeutic procedure with significant benefits.

Does HPV infection have impact on results of photodynamic treatment of vulvar lichen sclerosus?

BACKGROUND

The association between lichen sclerosus (LS) and human papilloma virus (HPV) infections remains unclear. The co-occurrence of both pathologies may impact treatment and prognosis. This study aimed to assess the results of photodynamic therapy (PDT) for vulvar LS and the effect of incidence of HPV infection on the results of treatment and duration of remission.

METHODS

A total of 73 patients with LS were included in the study. In each patient, 14 types of HPV were detected. PDT was performed using the PhotoDyn 501, which emits light at 630 nm wavelength and power density of 204 mW/cm². Focal lesions were exposed for 10 min once weekly for a total of 10 weeks. The complete treatment cycle was repeated after 3 months, whenever required. The biopsy was repeated after completion of treatment.

RESULTS

The number of treatment cycles for HPV-positive and HPV-negative patients were not statistically different (cases after one or two PDT cycles). An exception was a group of patients with LS requiring three PDT cycles. Analysis of remission period considering HPV results (positive vs. negative) did not reveal a significant statistical difference. Mean remission period among HPV-negative patients was longer in comparison to remission time for those with positive HPV results (14 ± 9 vs. 11 ± 9 months).

CONCLUSIONS

PDT may be a promising, effective, and safe method for the treatment of LS regardless of HPV infection.

[Update on precursors of vulvar carcinoma]

Vulvar carcinomas represent 4% of all gynaecological cancers with 838 new cases in France in 2018. The precursor lesions of vulvar carcinomas are differentiated vulvar intraepithelial lesion (dVIN) in a context of lichen sclerosus and vulvar high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) link to human papillomavirus (HPV) infection. Three typical clinical forms of HSIL are described: the Bowenoid papulosis, the Bowen's disease and the confluent VIN. Histopathology cannot differentiate effectively these two types of lesions. P16 and P53 immunostaining are valuable tools to respectively assess HPV infection and divide different types of dVIN. However, P53 immunostaining is still lacking sensibility to detect dVIN. First line therapies are medical treatment excluding the cases with a doubt of invasion. The gold standard treatment for dVIN and vulvar HSIL are respectively topical corticosteroids and imiquimod. Primary prevention for vulvar HSIL and dVIN are respectively HPV vaccination and early treatment of lichen sclerosus. Destructive therapy can be used in case of medical treatment failure such as CO2 laser, cryotherapy, dynamic phototherapy. Surgical indications should be carefully assessed between the risk of recurrence, the spread of the lesions, the aesthetic and functional aspect. Surgical procedures consist in either superficial vulvectomy or radical vulvectomy with or without flap reconstruction. Recurrence rate after surgery is around 20%.

Can radical surgical treatment of the vulva be justified in the absence of a conclusive diagnosis of squamous cell carcinoma on biopsy? A retrospective 10-year cohort study

OBJECTIVES

The extent of surgical treatment for vulvar lesions is predominantly guided by the histopathologic diagnosis rendered on the pre-operative biopsy. For premalignant lesions, local excisions are performed, whereas for vulvar squamous cell carcinoma (VSCC), more radical procedures are mandatory. However, even in the absence of a conclusive diagnosis of VSCC on biopsy, the surgeon may opt for a radical excision on grounds of strong clinical suspicion, with a view to avoiding repeat surgeries. We studied a retrospective, 10-year cohort of patients who underwent vulvar excisions, in the absence of a conclusive biopsy diagnosis of VSCC. We aimed to identify the factors predictive of VSCC in these patients, and assess their treatment.

STUDY DESIGN

All patients who underwent vulvar excision (2005-2016) at Erasmus MC, without a definitive diagnosis of VSCC on the preoperative biopsy were included. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the factors predictive of a final diagnosis of VSCC. Surgical treatment was categorized as definitive, incomplete, or over-treatment, based on histopathology of the excision specimen and previous surgical history.

RESULTS

In 57 % (64/113) of all included patients, the final diagnosis was VSCC. Higher patient age (p = 0.03), and suspicion of VSCC on pre-operative biopsy (p < 0.001) were associated with a final diagnosis of VSCC on univariate analysis. Suspicion of VSCC on biopsy was the only significant predictor (p < 0.001) on multivariable analysis. For patients with a suspicion of VSCC on biopsy, radical treatment was more frequently performed (p < 0.001), which resulted in over-treatment in only 1 case. Where the surgeon had performed a limited excision despite a suspicion of VSCC on biopsy, high patient age, co-morbidities, location of the tumor close to the anus, and history of previous vulvar surgeries were factors which influenced the decision. The treatment administered was definitive for 72 %., i.e. additional surgeries were not required; 25 % received incomplete treatment and needed additional surgeries, and 3% received over-treatment.

CONCLUSION

Suspicion of VSCC on biopsy is strongly predictive of a final diagnosis of carcinoma. In our cohort, radical treatment performed on patients with clinical and histopathological suspicion of VSCC resulted in minimal over-treatment, and helped avoid second surgeries.

Photodynamic therapy for treatment of usual-type vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia: a case report and literature review

Vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia (VIN) is a pre-malignant condition of the vulvar skin that is found in 50% to 70% of patients with vulvar squamous cell cancer and is regarded as a precursor of vulvar tumors. Thus far, treatment remains lesion- and patient-specific. Here, we describe a VIN patient who presented with a 15-month history of large lesions in the bilateral labium, associated with human papillomavirus infection. The lesions were inappropriate for surgical excision and laser ablation because of their size; therefore, they were treated with photodynamic therapy and concurrent topical 5-aminolevulinic acid hydrochloride. The patient showed no recurrence throughout 2 years of post-treatment follow-up, and reported only slight pain during treatment. Moreover, no significant side effects or scarring were detected. Thus, we conclude that photodynamic therapy can be a useful alternative treatment for large VIN in the bilateral labium that cannot be excised or ablated.

Thermal photodynamic therapy increases apoptosis and reactive oxygen species generation in cutaneous and mucosal squamous cell carcinoma cells

Thermal photodynamic therapy (PDT) is an emerging modality to optimize treatment of pre-cancerous squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) lesions, known as actinic keratoses. Thermal PDT involves heating the tissue, skin, or mucosa above normal skin temperature during 5-aminolevulinic (5-ALA) incubation and irradiating with blue light, which leads to cell apoptosis and reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation. To our knowledge, thermal PDT has not been studied for the treatment of cutaneous or mucosal SCC. We incubated two SCC cell lines with 5-ALA for 30 minutes at temperatures between 21 °C and 42 °C and then irradiated cells with 1000 seconds of blue light. We measured changes in apoptosis, necrosis, and ROS. At 36 °C, there was a dose-dependent increase in apoptosis and ROS generation. Thermal incubation of 5-ALA at 39° and 42 °C followed by blue light increased cell apoptosis and ROS generation compared to untreated control samples incubated at the same temperatures. Thermal PDT may represent a new treatment option for cutaneous and mucosal SCC cancer. Thermal PDT is associated with an increase in SCC cellular apoptosis and is associated with an upregulation in ROS. Clinical trials are required to determine optimal thermal PDT treatment parameters and efficacy for cutaneous and mucosal SCC.