Resilience in People with Lewy Body Disorders and Their Care Partners: Association with Mental Health, Relationship Satisfaction, and Care Burden

Caregiver Burden in Parkinson Disease: A Scoping Review of the Literature from 2017-2022

Caregiver burden is a term that refers to the adverse effect of caregiving on the physical, emotional, social, spiritual, and financial well-being of the caregiver. Caregiver burden is associated with providing care to an individual with a chronic illness or disability, and the unique symptoms of Parkinson disease (PD) can amplify a patient's needs and reliance on others, leading to adverse outcomes for patients and their caregivers. In this scoping review of the literature from January 2017 through April 2022 that included 114 studies, we provide an updated, evidence-based summary of patient and caregiver-related factors that contribute to caregiver burden in PD. We also describe the impact of caregiver stress and burden on caregivers based on qualitative research studies and review recent interventions to mitigate burden. By providing clinical updates for practitioners, this review is designed to improve recognition of caregiver burden in the post-pandemic era and foster the development of targeted interventions to reduce caregiver burden in PD.

Differential impact of resilience on demoralization and depression in Parkinson disease

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to study the interrelations of demoralization, depression, and resilience in patients with Parkinson disease, and, more specifically, to determine if higher resilience in patients with Parkinson disease is associated with lower demoralization, lower depression, or both.

METHODS

Outpatients with Parkinson disease (N = 95) were assessed for demoralization, depression, and resilience, as well as sociodemographic, clinical, and treatment-related variables. Bivariable associations, standard regressions, linear regression with copula correction, and correspondence analysis were used to analyze the data.

RESULTS

Although the bivariable association between resilience and depression was statistically significant, the association ceased to be significant when demoralization was taken into consideration in both standard regressions and linear regression with copula correction. By contrast, the association between resilience and demoralization was significant when depression was not taken into consideration and continued to be significant when depression was taken into consideration. Correspondence analysis revealed that low resilience was strongly related to demoralization combined with depression, whereas normal resilience was closely correlated with depression without demoralization.

CONCLUSION

These results expand our understanding of resilience by suggesting that it is a mechanism evolved to reduce or prevent demoralization and not just depression. Reducing demoralization and strengthening resilience as part of a comprehensive treatment plan are likely to improve the prognosis of Parkinson disease.

A systematic review and psychometric evaluation of resilience measurement scales for people living with dementia and their carers

Psychometrically sound resilience outcome measures are essential to establish how health and care services or interventions can enhance the resilience of people living with dementia (PLWD) and their carers. This paper systematically reviews the literature to identify studies that administered a resilience measurement scale with PLWD and/or their carers and examines the psychometric properties of these measures. Electronic abstract databases and the internet were searched, and an international network contacted to identify peer-reviewed journal articles. Two authors independently extracted data. They critically reviewed the measurement properties from the available psychometric data in the studies, using a standardised checklist adapted for purpose. Fifty-one studies were included in the final review, which applied nine different resilience measures, eight developed in other populations and one developed for dementia carers in Thailand. None of the measures were developed for use with people living with dementia. The majority of studies (N = 47) focussed on dementia carers, three studies focussed on people living with dementia and one study measured both carers and the person with dementia. All the studies had missing information regarding the psychometric properties of the measures as applied in these two populations. Nineteen studies presented internal consistency data, suggesting seven of the nine measures demonstrate acceptable reliability in these new populations. There was some evidence of construct validity, and twenty-eight studies hypothesised effects a priori (associations with other outcome measure/demographic data/differences in scores between relevant groups) which were partially supported. The other studies were either exploratory or did not specify hypotheses. This limited evidence does not necessarily mean the resilience measure is not suitable, and we encourage future users of resilience measures in these populations to report information to advance knowledge and inform further reviews. All the measures require further psychometric evaluation in both these populations. The conceptual adequacy of the measures as applied in these new populations was questionable. Further research to understand the experience of resilience for people living with dementia and carers could establish the extent current measures -which tend to measure personal strengths -are relevant and comprehensive, or whether further work is required to establish a new resilience outcome measure.

Burden and benefit-A mixed methods study of informal Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis caregivers in Ireland and the Netherlands

OBJECTIVES

Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) is a systemic and terminal disorder of the central nervous system which causes paralysis of limbs, respiratory and bulbar muscles, impacting on physical, communication, cognitive and behavioural functioning. Informal caregivers play a key role in the care of people with ALS. This study aimed to explore experiences of burden along with any beneficial aspects of caregiving in ALS. An understanding of both burden and benefit is important to support the informal caregiver and the person with ALS.

METHODS/DESIGN

This exploratory mixed methods study characterizes two groups of informal caregivers in Ireland (n = 76) and the Netherlands (n = 58). In a semi-structured interview, quantitative data were collected in the form of standardized measures assessing psychological distress, quality of life and burden. Qualitative data were collected from an open ended question, in which caregivers identified positive aspects in their caregiving experience. These data types were purposefully mixed in the analysis and interpretation stages, to provide a greater depth of evidence through diverse research lenses.

RESULTS

The caregiver cohorts were predominantly female (69%) and spouse/partners (84%) of the person with ALS. Greater levels of self-assessed burden were found among the caregivers in the Netherlands (p < 0.05), and higher levels of quality of life among the cohort from Ireland (p < 0.05). Themes generated through qualitative analysis identified caregiver satisfaction, ability to meet the patient's needs and the (re) evaluation of meaning and existential aspects of life as positive aspects of caregiving. Existential factors were identified frequently by the caregivers in Ireland, and personal satisfaction and meeting their care recipient's needs by caregivers in the Netherlands. Three percent of all respondents reported there was nothing positive about caregiving.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on our findings, we suggest that both burden and the presence of positive factors should be evaluated and monitored. The possibility of concurrent positive and challenging experiences should be considered in the design and delivery of supportive interventions for informal caregivers.