Information Available to Parents Seeking Education about Infant Play, Milestones, and Development from Popular Sources

Analysis of Content About Infant Development From Formal Parent Education Sources in Different World Regions

This study evaluated information shared with parents about infant development through formal sources in five countries and international organizations (i.e., regions). Consistent findings among regions were: (1) Tendency to format information as developmental milestones; (2) Sharing primarily information about motor development, but most often repeating recommendations for advancing language development; (3) Variability in specific information shared among regions and among sources within each region about the same general topics; and (4) Consensus mentioning seven behaviors representing early exploratory, mobility, and communication abilities that support learning and expression. Differences in the content shared among the regions are also described. The findings provide insight into commonalities and differences in educational practices that likely reflect more universal versus regional cultural beliefs and values.

Developmental Monitoring and Promotion in Home Visiting: a Qualitative Study of Parents and Providers

Developmental monitoring and promotion efforts are keys to identifying potential developmental concerns and connecting young children to intervention services. Evidence-based home visiting programs are one avenue for developmental monitoring and promotion, particularly for families with young children who may need extra support (e.g., families living in poverty, families dealing with substance use). In the present qualitative study, we interviewed parents (N = 23) and providers (N = 18) from three home visiting programs to understand the ways in which home visiting engages in developmental monitoring and promotion. Findings indicated that children participating in home visiting were regularly screened for developmental concerns (developmental monitoring). Providers also discussed screener results with parents and provided activities and materials to encourage parents to engage in positive parenting behaviors (developmental promotion). Barriers to monitoring and promotion were also uncovered and included family buy-in and logistical constraints. Implications suggest enhanced provider training to overcome barriers and greater policy and funding support for home visiting to extend the reach of home visiting and bolster developmental monitoring and promotion efforts.

Effectiveness of a training program for the acquisition of motor milestones in infants: a randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

In infants, the acquisition of all motor milestones is considered an expression of correct motor development during the first months of life. An association between typical motor development of the newborn and cognitive areas has been established. Few studies have evaluated the efficiency of parents' knowledge of expected milestones in healthy infants. This study aims to determine whether parents' knowledge of specific tasks can improve the achievement of all gross motor milestones in the newborn.

METHOD

The current study examined gross motor development in term-born infants without pathologies at 9, 12, and 15 months and the effectiveness of a training program developed for parents. The research group comprised 82 full-term infants divided into an experimental group (EG) and a control group (CG) of 41 subjects each. A randomized clinical trial study was performed. The routine follow-up program consisted of four informative sessions on the experimental group at the beginning of each trimester with information about the expected motor milestones and how to stimulate their infants to achieve them. The gross motor development of the participants was measured using the Alberta Infant Motor Scale. An ANCOVA test was performed to assess the possible influence of sex, type of birth, or the presence of siblings controlled and uncontrolled as confounding variables on the results.

RESULTS

The initial baseline assessment showed no statistical differences between groups (p > 0,05). After controlling confounding variables, at 9 months the EG scored 5,5 points higher than the CG (p < 0,001). At 12 months, EG scored 3,7 points higher than CG (p < 0,001). At 15 months, EG scored 2,2 points higher than CG (p = 0,001). The experimental group scored significantly higher, with a 25-point higher percentile in each assessment.

CONCLUSION

A learning program aimed at increasing parents' knowledge of their infant´s gross motor development improved it. The information collected will help professionals who support parents in monitoring their babies. Future studies using larger sample sizes, analysing other domains of global infant development, or investigating the possible influence of other parental factors are recommended.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT04693494. Registered December 28, 2020, retrospectively registered. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04693494 .

Infant Motor Milestones: Analysis of Content and Variability Among Popular Sources for Parents

PURPOSE

Evaluate the content and variability of infant motor milestone education provided to parents in popular sources.

METHODS

Sources were screened for inclusion, and their motor milestone content was coded. Descriptive and inferential analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Content from 241 websites, applications, and books was evaluated; 6984 motor milestones were extracted, representing 146 unique milestone codes across 14 categories. Books and applications had more milestone content than websites. There was variability in the milestones mentioned and their associated ages across the sources and relative to the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) content. Several frequently mentioned milestones were behaviors that facilitate early learning.

CONCLUSIONS

There is variability among sources in the motor milestones they provide to parents of infants. The AAP and CDC content likely has some influence on the broader content available, but there is substantial deviation from the information they provide.

Depth and Quality of Recommendations in Popular Sources About How to Play with Infants: Content Analysis

AIM

Systematically evaluate the depth and quality of play recommendations provided in popular sources for parents of infants in the first year of life.

METHODS

This represents the second stage of a larger analysis of educational content available to parents. Two coders (>90% agreement) extracted and coded play activities from popular websites, applications, and books screened from a systematic online search. Depth of instruction variables were extracted. Activity quality was rated based on opportunities for child-initiated movement, problem-solving with objects, and responsive communication.

RESULTS

4370 play activities from 214 sources were analyzed. Activities were likely to suggest specific ages for infants and that a caregiver be present. Less than half of the activities incorporated toys or provided guidance about how to position or physically support infants. Activity quality was low; most activities did not explicitly encourage parents to provide opportunities for child-initiated movement, problem-solving with objects, or quality communication.

CONCLUSIONS

Parents may encounter a large number of play activities in popular sources, but the depth of instruction and quality of those activities could be improved. Provision of higher-quality education to parents may enhance parent-child play interactions to positively impact parent and child outcomes, especially for children at risk for delays.

Value of video-based education to enhance infant motor development

BACKGROUND

Parents play a vital role in promoting infant motor development and physical activity; however, there is little information available to parents on how to support healthy movement. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility of implementing video-based education to improve infant physical activity and motor development.

METHODS

This multiple case study consisted of semi-structured interviews with mothers (n = 12) and early childhood experts (n = 5, e.g., pediatrician, home visitor). Participants watched pre-recorded videos and answered questions which were developed following Bowens and colleagues guide for designing feasibility studies. Data were analyzed using a directed content analysis approach.

RESULTS

Most mothers (91.7 %) reported they were highly likely to recommend the videos to others and said the best way to share these videos would be through an app or social media (83.3 %) or health care entities (e.g., hospital, pediatrician, 75 %). Half of mothers (50 %) reported they would be interested in seeing videos once a month or once every couple of months. Further, all experts agreed parents would be somewhat or highly likely to use the videos and a majority (80 %) stated they were highly likely to recommend and share videos like these. Experts' top suggestions for sharing the videos was through an app/social media (40 %) and credible websites (40 %).

DISCUSSION

Overall, the videos appear feasible for mothers. Both groups primarily suggested that videos be disseminated through social media, online, or through an app. Future research should engage parents and healthcare providers in developing videos.