Preoperative Imaging Evaluation after Downstaging of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Multi-Center Study

Assessment of resectability of pancreatic cancer using novel immersive high-performance virtual reality rendering of abdominal computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging

PURPOSE

Virtual reality (VR) allows for an immersive and interactive analysis of imaging data such as computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The aim of this study is to assess the comprehensibility of VR anatomy and its value in assessing resectability of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).

METHODS

This study assesses exposure to VR anatomy and evaluates the potential role of VR in assessing resectability of PDAC. Firstly, volumetric abdominal CT and MRI data were displayed in an immersive VR environment. Volunteering physicians were asked to identify anatomical landmarks in VR. In the second stage, experienced clinicians were asked to identify vascular involvement in a total of 12 CT and MRI scans displaying PDAC (2 resectable, 2 borderline resectable, and 2 locally advanced tumours per modality). Results were compared to 2D standard PACS viewing.

RESULTS

In VR visualisation of CT and MRI, the abdominal anatomical landmarks were recognised by all participants except the pancreas (30/34) in VR CT and the splenic (31/34) and common hepatic artery (18/34) in VR MRI, respectively. In VR CT, resectable, borderline resectable, and locally advanced PDAC were correctly identified in 22/24, 20/24 and 19/24 scans, respectively. Whereas, in VR MRI, resectable, borderline resectable, and locally advanced PDAC were correctly identified in 19/24, 19/24 and 21/24 scans, respectively. Interobserver agreement as measured by Fleiss κ was 0.7 for CT and 0.4 for MRI, respectively (p < 0.001). Scans were significantly assessed more accurately in VR CT than standard 2D PACS CT, with a median of 5.5 (IQR 4.75-6) and a median of 3 (IQR 2-3) correctly assessed out of 6 scans (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

VR enhanced visualisation of abdominal CT and MRI scan data provides intuitive handling and understanding of anatomy and might allow for more accurate staging of PDAC and could thus become a valuable adjunct in PDAC resectability assessment in the future.

Meta-analysis of adjuvant chemotherapy versus no adjuvant chemotherapy for resected stage I pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND

To evaluate comparative outcomes of pancreatic cancer resection with or without adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage I pancreatic cancer.

METHODS

A systematic search of MEDLINE, CENTRAL, and Web of Science and bibliographic reference lists were conducted. All comparative studies reporting outcomes of pancreatic cancer resection for stage I cancer with or without adjuvant chemotherapy were included, and their risk of bias was assessed using the Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies-of Interventions tool. Survival outcomes were analyzed using the hazard ratio and odds ratio for the time-to-event and dichotomous outcomes, respectively.

RESULTS

We included 6 comparative studies reporting a total of 6,874 patients with resected stage 1 pancreatic cancer, of whom 3,951 patients had no adjuvant chemotherapy, and the remaining 2,923 patients received adjuvant chemotherapy. The use of adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with significantly higher overall survival (hazard ratio 0.71, 95% confidence interval 0.62-0.82, P < .00001) and 2-year survival (65.1% vs 57.4%, odds ratio 1.99; 95% confidence interval 1.01-1.41, P = .04) compared to no use of adjuvant chemotherapy. However, there was no statistically significant difference in 1-year (86.8% vs 78.4%, odds ratio 1.60; 95% confidence interval 0.72-3.57, P = .25), 3-year (46.0% vs 44.0%, odds ratio 1.07; 95% confidence interval 0.90-1.29, P = .43), or 5-year survival (24.8% vs 23.3%, odds ratio 1.03; 95% confidence interval 0.80-1.33, P = .81) between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSION

Meta-analysis of best available evidence (level 2a with low to moderate certainty) demonstrates that adjuvant chemotherapy may confer survival benefits for stage I pancreatic cancer when compared to the use of surgery alone. Randomized control trials are required to escalate the level of evidence and confirm these findings with consideration of contemporary chemotherapy agents and regimens.

Preoperative assessment of peripheral vascular invasion of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma based on high-resolution MRI

OBJECTIVES

Preoperative imaging of vascular invasion is important for surgical resection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). However, whether MRI and CT share the same evaluation criteria remains unclear. This study aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of high-resolution MRI (HR-MRI), conventional MRI (non-HR-MRI) and CT for PDAC vascular invasion.

METHODS

Pathologically proven PDAC with preoperative HR-MRI (79 cases, 58 with CT) and non-HR-MRI (77 cases, 59 with CT) were retrospectively collected. Vascular invasion was confirmed surgically or pathologically. The degree of tumour-vascular contact, vessel narrowing and contour irregularity were reviewed respectively. Diagnostic criteria 1 (C1) was the presence of all three characteristics, and criteria 2 (C2) was the presence of any one of them. The diagnostic efficacies of different examination methods and criteria were evaluated and compared.

RESULTS

HR-MRI showed satisfactory performance in assessing vascular invasion (AUC: 0.87-0.92), especially better sensitivity (0.79-0.86 vs. 0.40-0.79) than that with non-HR-MRI and CT. HR-MRI was superior to non-HR-MRI. C2 was superior to C1 on CT evaluation (0.85 vs. 0.79, P = 0.03). C1 was superior to C2 in the venous assessment using HR-MRI (0.90 vs. 0.87, P = 0.04) and in the arterial assessment using non-HR-MRI (0.69 vs. 0.68, P = 0.04). The combination of C1-assessed HR-MRI and C2-assessed CT was significantly better than that of CT alone (0.96 vs. 0.86, P = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

HR-MRI more accurately assessed PDAC vascular invasion than conventional MRI and may contribute to operative decision-making. C1 was more applicable to MRI scans, and C2 to CT scans. The combination of C1-assessed HR-MRI and C2-assessed CT outperformed CT alone and showed the best efficacy in preoperative examination of PDAC.

Intraoperative Ultrasound During Surgical Exploration in Patients with Pancreatic Cancer and Vascular Involvement (ULTRAPANC): A Prospective Multicenter Study

BACKGROUND

Determining the resectability of pancreatic cancer with vascular involvement on preoperative computed tomography imaging remains challenging, especially following preoperative chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy. Intraoperative ultrasound (IOUS) may provide real-time additional information, but prospective multicenter series confirming its value are lacking.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This prospective multicenter study included patients undergoing surgical exploration for pancreatic cancer with vascular involvement. All patients underwent IOUS at the start of explorative laparotomy. Primary outcomes were resectability status as defined by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network and the extent of vascular involvement.

RESULTS

Overall, 85 patients were included, of whom 74 (87%) were post preoperative chemotherapy, and mostly following FOLFIRINOX regimen (n = 57; 76%). On the basis of preoperative imaging, 34 (40%) patients were staged as resectable (RPC), 32 (38%) borderline resectable (BRPC), and 19 (22%) locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). IOUS changed the resectability status in 32/85 (38%) patients (p < 0.001), including 8/19 (42%) patients with LAPC who were downstaged (4 to BRPC, 4 to RPC), and 22/32 (69%) patients with BRPC who were downstaged to RPC. Among patients with presumed superior mesenteric artery (SMA) involvement, 20/28 (71%) had no SMA involvement on IOUS. In 15 of these 20 patients a pancreatic resection was performed, all with R0 SMA margin.

CONCLUSION

IOUS during surgical exploration for pancreatic cancer and vascular involvement downstaged the resectability status in over one-third of patients, which could facilitate progress during surgical exploration. This finding should be confirmed by larger studies, including detailed pathology assessment. Trial Registration www.trialregister.nl (NL7621).

Pathological Response Predicts Survival after Pancreatectomy following Neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX for Pancreatic Cancer

Background: The clinical course of complete pathologic response (cPR) in pancreatic cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy is not well known. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical course of patients according to pathological response, including cPR, who received only FOLIFIRNOX in advanced pancreatic cancer. Methods: Patients who underwent pancreatectomy after FOLFIRINOX for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) from 2017 to 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. cPR was defined as an absence of residual tumor on pathologic report. A nearly complete pathologic response (ncPR) was defined as a tumor confined to pancreas parenchyma, less than 1 cm without lymph-node metastasis. cPR and ncPR were assigned into a favorable pathologic response group (fPR). Kaplan−Meier method and Cox proportional hazard models were used for analysis. Results: Of a total 64 patients, 8 (12.5%) had a cPR and 8 (12.5%) had a ncPR. In the fPR group, median OS and DFS were superior to those of non-pathologic response group (more than 60 months vs. 38 months, p < 0.001; more than 42 months vs. 10 months, p < 0.001). On multivariable analyses, fPR and adjuvant therapy were independent prognostic factors for OS (HR: 0.12; 95% CI: 0.02−0.96, p = 0.05; HR: 0.26; 95% CI: 0.09−0.74, p = 0.01) and DFS (HR: 0.31; 95% CI: 0.12−0.86, p = 0.02; HR:0.31; 95% CI: 0.13−0.72, p = 0.01). Conclusions: pathologic response predicts survival after pancreatectomy following neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX for pancreatic cancer, and adjuvant chemotherapy following neoadjuvant treatment might be beneficial for OS and DFS.

PANCREATODUODENECTOMY IN PATIENT WITH VON HIPPEL-LINDAU DISEASE: A LITERATURE REVIEW

BACKGROUND

The von Hippel-Lindau disease is a highly penetrant autosomal dominant syndrome characterized by tumor predisposition in different organs.

AIM

This study aimed to describe a case of a pancreatoduodenectomy for a 30-year-old male patient with von Hippel-Lindau disease.

METHODS

We present a case study and the literature review aiming at the state-of-the-art management of a patient with pheochromocytoma, capillary hemangioblastoma in the peripheral retina, and two neuroendocrine tumors in the pancreas.

RESULTS

A larger pancreatic lesion was located in the uncinate process, measuring 31 mm. The smaller lesion was located in the proximal pancreas and was detected only on the positron emission tomography-computed tomography scan with DOTATOC-68Ga. Genetic investigation revealed a mutation in the locus NM_000551.3 c.482G>A (p.Arg161Gln) of the Von Hippel-Lindau Human Suppressor gene. The uncinate process tumor was larger than 30 mm and the patient had a mutation on exon 3; therefore, we indicated a pancreatoduodenectomy involving the proximal pancreas to resect both tumors en bloc. During the postoperative period, the patient presented a peripancreatic fluid collection, which was treated as a grade B pancreatic fistula with clinical resolution of the complication. On postoperative day 21, he was discharged home.

CONCLUSION

The management of patients with von Hippel-Lindau disease and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors is complex and must be centered on tertiary institutions with a large volume of pancreatic surgery. Although the current literature assists in decision-making in most situations, each step of the treatment requires analysis and discussion between different medical specialties, including surgeons, clinicians, radiologists, and anesthesiologists.

US-Guided Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation of Locally Advanced Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: A 5-Year High-Volume Center Experience

PURPOSE

 The aim of this study was to investigate the safety and effectiveness of percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) of the pancreatic body by assessing the overall survival of patients and evaluating the effects of the procedure in the clinical and radiological follow-up.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

 Patients with unresectable LAPC after failed chemoradiotherapy for at least six months were retrospectively included. Percutaneous RFA was performed after a preliminary ultrasound (US) feasibility evaluation. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) and CA 19.9 sampling were performed before and 24 hours and 30 days after the procedure to evaluate the effects of the ablation. Patients were followed-up after discharge considering the two main endpoints: procedure-related complications and death.

RESULTS

 35 patients were included, 5 were excluded. All patients underwent RFA with no procedure-related complications reported. The mean size of tumors was 49 mm before treatment. The mean dimension of the ablated necrotic zone was 32 mm, with a mean extension of 65 % compared to the whole tumor size. Tumor density was statistically reduced one day after the procedure (p < 0.001). The mean CA 19.9 levels before and 24 hours and 30 days after the procedure were 285.8 U/mL, 635.2 U/mL, and 336.0 U/mL, respectively, with a decrease or stability at the 30-day evaluation in 80 % of cases. The mean survival was 310 (65-718) days.

CONCLUSION

 Percutaneous RFA of LAPC is a feasible technique in patients who cannot undergo surgery, with great debulking effects and a very low complication rate.

Resectable and Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: Role of the Radiologist and Oncologist in the Era of Precision Medicine

The incidence and mortality of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma are growing over time. The management of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma involves a multidisciplinary team, ideally involving experts from surgery, diagnostic imaging, interventional endoscopy, medical oncology, radiation oncology, pathology, geriatric medicine, and palliative care. An adequate staging of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and re-assessment of the tumor after neoadjuvant therapy allows the multidisciplinary team to choose the most appropriate treatment for the patient. This review article discusses advancement in the molecular basis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, diagnostic tools available for staging and tumor response assessment, and management of resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer.

Preoperative CT predictors of survival in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma undergoing curative intent surgery

PURPOSE

To evaluate the associations between computed tomography (CT) imaging features extracted from the structured American Pancreatic Association (APA)/Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR) template and overall survival in patients with resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).

METHODS

This retrospective analysis included consecutive patients with PDAC who consented to genomic tumor testing and underwent preoperative imaging and curative intent surgical resection from December 2006 to July 2017. Two radiologists assessed preoperative CT imaging using the APA/SAR PDAC-reporting template. Univariable associations between overall survival and imaging variables were evaluated using Cox proportional hazards regression.

RESULTS

The study included 168 patients (66 years ± 11; 91 women). 126/168 patients (75%) received upfront surgical resection whereas 42/168 (25%) received neoadjuvant therapy prior to surgical resection. In the entire cohort, features associated with decreased overall survival were tumor arterial contact of any kind (hazard ratio (HR) 1.89, 95% CI 1.13-3.14, p = 0.020), tumor contact with the common hepatic artery (HR 2.33, 95% CI 1.35-4.04, p = 0.009), and portal vein deformity (HR 3.22, 95% CI 1.63-6.37, p = 0.003). In the upfront surgical group, larger tumor size was associated with decreased overall survival (HR 2.30, 95% CI 1.19-4.42, p = 0.013). In the neoadjuvant therapy group, the presence of venous collaterals was the only feature associated with decreased overall survival (HR 2.28, 95% CI 1.04-4.99, p = 0.042).

CONCLUSION

The application of the APA/SAR pancreatic adenocarcinoma reporting template may identify predictors of survival that can aid in preoperative stratification of patients.

Radiological evaluation of pancreatic cancer: What is the significance of arterial encasement >180° after neoadjuvant treatment?

PURPOSE

This study aimed to evaluate contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CE-CT) features for prediction of arterial tumor invasion in pancreatic cancer (PDAC) patients in the event of arterial encasement >180° after neoadjuvant (radio-)chemotherapy (NAT).

METHODS

Seventy PDAC patients with seventy-five arteries showing encasement >180° after completion of NAT were analyzed. All patients underwent surgical exploration with either tumor resection including arterial resection, periadventitial dissection (arterial divestment) or confirmation of locally irresectable disease. CE-CT scans were assessed regarding tumor extent and artery-specific imaging features. The results were analyzed on a per-artery basis. Based on the intraoperative and histopathological findings, encased arteries were classified as either invaded or non-invaded.

RESULTS

Eighteen radiologically encased arteries were resected; of these, nine had pathologic evidence for tumor invasion. In 42 encased arteries, the tumor could be removed by arterial divestment. In 13 patients with 15 encased arteries, the tumor was deemed technically irresectable. Median tumor size, length of solid soft tissue contact, and degree of circumferential contiguity by solid soft tissue along the artery in CE-CT were significantly lower in the non-invaded than in the invaded artery group (p ≤ 0.017). Imaging features showed moderate accuracies for prediction of arterial invasion (≤72.0 %). The thresholds ≤26 mm for post-NAT solid soft tissue contact and ≤270° for circumferential contiguity by solid soft tissue had high negative predictive values (≥87.5 %).

CONCLUSION

Although post-NAT prediction of arterial invasion remains difficult, arteries with ≤270° contiguity by soft tissue and arteries with ≤26 mm length of solid soft tissue contact are unlikely to be invaded, with possible implications for surgical planning.

Comparison of Endocrine Therapies in Hormone Receptor-Positive and Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative Locally Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Network Meta-Analysis

We aimed to explore what kind of endocrine treatments are optimal for hormone receptor-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer in some specific clinical situations. We searched randomized controlled trials in Embase, Medline, the Cochrane library, and PubMed from inception to April 1, 2020 and performed a network meta-analysis based on a Bayesian fixed-effects model. Progression-free survival (PFS) with hazard ratios and corresponding 95% confidence interval was defined as the primary endpoint, while overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), clinical benefit rate and serious adverse events were used as secondary endpoints. A total of 35 studies involving 12,285 patients and 24 treatment options were included. In general, most co-treatment options prolonged PFS compared to single-agent therapy, of which aromatase inhibitor (AI) plus everolimus and fulvestrant plus palbociclib were probably the most effective agents, and the latter had the best safety record. However, despite the superior efficacy of fulvestrant plus capecitabine for PFS and OS, palpable toxic effects have been demonstrated for this treatment, so its application must be scrupulously considered. The results of subgroup analysis indicated that fulvestrant combined with palbociclib improved prognosis for phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)-mutated patients, PI3K-unmutated patients, patients with endocrine therapy resistance, and visceral metastatic patients, while no obvious improvement was detected in OS. Moreover, the efficacy of fulvestrant plus cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors was slightly better than that of AI plus CDK4/6 inhibitors, while AI plus everolimus was more efficacious than fulvestrant combined with everolimus in terms of PFS, OS, and ORR. In conclusion, our results provide moderate evidence that fulvestrant plus palbociclib and AI plus everolimus were the most effective treatments, while the efficacy and safety of fulvestrant plus palbociclib was obviously superior in some specific clinical situations.

A novel 4-aminoquinazoline derivative, DHW-208, suppresses the growth of human breast cancer cells by targeting the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway

Breast cancer is one of the most frequent cancers among women worldwide. However, there is still no effective therapeutic strategy for advanced breast cancer that has metastasized. Aberrant activation of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway is an essential step for the growth of human breast cancers. In our previous study, we designed and synthesized DHW-208 (2,4-difluoro-N-(5-(4-((1-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1H-pyrazol-4-yl)amino)quinazolin-6-yl)-2-methoxypyridin-3-yl)benzenesulfonamide) as a novel pan-PI3K inhibitor. This study aimed to assess the therapeutic efficacy of DHW-208 in breast cancer and investigate its underlying mechanism. We found that DHW-208 inhibited the growth, proliferation, migration, and invasion of breast cancer cells. Moreover, DHW-208 induced breast cancer cell apoptosis via the mitochondrial pathway and induced G0/G1 cell-cycle arrest. In vitro results show that DHW-208 is a dual inhibitor of PI3K and mTOR, and suppress the growth of human breast cancer cells by targeting the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway. Consistent with the in vitro results, in vivo studies demonstrated that DHW-208 elicits an antitumor effect by inhibiting the PI3K/AKT/mTOR-signaling pathway with a high degree of safety in breast cancer. Above all, we report for the first time that DHW-208 suppressed the growth of human breast cancer cells by inhibiting the PI3K/AKT/mTOR-signaling pathway both in vivo and in vitro. Our study may provide evidence for the use of DHW-208 as an effective, novel therapeutic candidate for the treatment of human breast cancers in clinical trials.

Clinical Practice Guidelines for Diagnosis, Treatment and Follow-Up of Exocrine Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: Evidence Evaluation and Recommendations by the Italian Association of Medical Oncology (AIOM)

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death in women (7%) and the sixth in men (5%) in Italy, with a life expectancy of around 5% at 5 years. From 2010, the Italian Association of Medical Oncology (AIOM) developed national guidelines for several cancers. In this report, we report a summary of clinical recommendations of diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of PDAC, which may guide physicians in their current practice. A panel of AIOM experts in upper gastrointestinal cancer malignancies discussed the available scientific evidence supporting the clinical recommendations.

Imaging and Management of Pancreatic Cancer

Pancreatic cancer is an aggressive disease with rising incidence and high mortality despite advances in imaging and therapeutic options. Surgical resection is currently the only curative treatment, with expanding roles for adjuvant and neoadjuvant chemoradiation. Accurate detection, staging, and post-treatment monitoring of pancreatic cancer are critical to improving survival and imaging plays a central role in the multidisciplinary approach to this disease. This article will provide a broad overview of the imaging and management of pancreatic cancer with a focus on diagnosis and staging, operative and nonoperative treatments, and post-therapeutic appearances after surgery and chemoradiation therapy.

Implementation of a strategic preoperative surgical meeting to improve the level of care at a high-volume pancreatic center: a before-after analysis of 1000 consecutive cases

The indication, planning, and risk analysis of a pancreatic surgical procedure have recently become increasingly complex. In December 2015, the "Pancreas Round" (PR) meeting was established at our institution to preoperatively review all scheduled cases with a specific focus on surgical indications and technical issues. The present study aims to determine the impact of the PR on the clinical practice in terms of avoiding unrequested laparotomies and anticipating intraoperative pitfalls. A "before-after" study was conducted by retrospectively comparing a pre-intervention period (9/2014-11/2015) to a prospectively assessed post-intervention one (12/2015-3/2017). Outcomes considered were explorative laparotomy (EL) occurrence and a "mismatch" between what was preoperatively expected by the PR and what was intraoperatively found. Of the 1057 patients included in the present study, 531 underwent surgery in the pre- and 526 in the post-intervention period, respectively. The EL rate was comparable between the two periods (15.4% vs. 12.2%, p = 0.123), despite the significant increase of surgical explorations after neoadjuvant chemotherapy during the post-intervention period (27% vs. 18%, p < 0.001). The "mismatch" rate between preoperative planning and intraoperative findings was significantly reduced in the post-intervention period (12.2% vs. 8.4%, p = 0.038) compared to the pre-PR period. In the setting of a high-volume center, a preoperative surgical meeting designed to review all cases scheduled for surgical exploration can enhance the level of care by addressing intraoperative pitfalls.

Vascular Resection for Pancreatic Cancer: 2019 French Recommendations Based on a Literature Review From 2008 to 6-2019

Introduction: Vascular resection remains a subject of debate in the management of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (PDAC). These French recommendations were drafted on behalf of the French National Institute of Cancer (INCA-2019).

Material and Methods: A systematic literature search, with PubMed, Medline® (OvidSP), EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, was performed for abstracts published in English from January 2008 to June 2019, and identified systematic reviews/metaanalyses, retrospective analyses and case series dedicated to vascular resections in the setting of PDAC. All selected articles were graded for level of evidence and strength of recommendation was given according to the GRADE system.

Results: Neoadjuvant treatment should be performed rather than direct surgery in borderline and locally advanced non-metastatic PDAC with venous and/or arterial infiltration (T4 stage). Patients who respond or those with stable disease and good performance status should undergo surgical exploration to assess resectability because cross-sectional imaging often fails to identify the extent of the remaining viable tumor. Combining vascular resection with pancreatectomy in these cases increases the feasibility of curative resection which is still the only option to improve long-term survival. Venous resection (VR) is recommended if resection is possible in the presence of limited lateral or circumferential involvement but without venous occlusion and in the absence of arterial contact with the celiac axis (CA; cephalic tumors) or the superior mesenteric artery (SMA; all tumor locations) (Grade B). The patients should be in good general condition because mortality and morbidity are higher than following pancreatectomy without VR (Grade B). In case of planned VR, neoadjuvant treatment is recommended since it improves both rate of R0 resections and survival compared to upfront surgery (Grade B). Due to their complexity and specificities, arterial resection (AR; mainly the hepatic artery (HA) or the CA) must be discussed in selected patients, in multidisciplinary team meetings in tertiary referral centers, according to the tumor location and the type of arterial extension. In case of invasion of a short segment of the common HA, resection with arterial reconstruction may be proposed after neoadjuvant therapy. In case of SMA invasion, neoadjuvant therapy may be followed by laparotomy with dissection and biopsy of peri-arterial tissues. A pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) with SMA-resection is not recommended if the frozen section examination is positive (Grade C). In case of distal PDAC with invasion of the CA, a distal pancreatectomy with CA-resection without arterial reconstruction may be proposed after neoadjuvant therapy and radiologic embolization of the CA branches (expert opinion).

Conclusion: For PDAC with vascular involvement, neoadjuvant treatment followed by pancreatectomy with venous resection or even arterial resection can be proposed as a curative option in selected patients with selected vascular involvement.