The Italian Rare Biliary tract Cancer initiative (IRaBiCa): A multicentric observational study of Gruppo Oncologico dell'Italia Meridionale (GOIM) in collaboration with Gruppo Italiano Colangiocarcinoma (GICO)

INTRODUCTION

About 90% of cholangiocarcinomas are adenocarcinomas with glandular or tubular structures lined by epithelial cells, with no bile production and with a variable degree of differentiation, arising in the background of desmoplastic stroma. The remaining 10% is represented by rarer histological variants of which there is little knowledge regarding the biological behavior, molecular characterization, and sensitivity to the various possible therapies, including molecular-based treatments. Such rare tumors are described only in case reports or small retrospective series because of their exclusion from clinical trials. This national initiative, here presented, aims to address the following knowledge gap: a) how much does histological diversity translate into clinical manifestation variety? b) are those chemotherapy regimens, recommended for conventional biliary tract cancers, potentially active in rare variants?Therefore, epidemiological, pathological, and clinical characterization of series of rare biliary histotypes/variants, for which therapeutic and follow-up data are available, will be collected.

METHODS

An Italian task force on rare tumors of the biliary tract (IRaBiCa) has been created, whose initiative is a multicenter retrospective study involving 34 Italian cancer centers.Clinical data from approximately 100 patients will be collected and analyzed. Continuous variables will be presented as median ± standard deviation, while categorical variables will be expressed in terms of frequency. Kaplan-Maier analyses will be used to compare disease free, progression free and overall survival, according to the different histotypes.

CONCLUSIONS

We expect to gather novel data on rare histotypes of biliary tract cancer that will be useful to support their molecular and immunological characterization.

Prognostic role of sodium levels in colorectal cancer patients receiving aflibercept plus FOLFIRI

Aim: To investigate the impact of natremia in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients treated with aflibercept plus folinic acid, 5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin and irinotecan (FOLFIRI). Patients & methods: A total of 84 mCRC patients receiving aflibercept plus FOLFIRI as second-line treatment were enrolled and divided into two groups based on their median sodium value. Progression-free survival and overall survival were analyzed. Results: Patients with sodium levels ≥140 mEq/l had significantly longer median progression-free survival (4.1 vs 2 months; p < 0.01) and median overall survival (12 vs 7.3 months; p < 0.01) compared with those with lower levels. Conclusion: This study suggests that higher pretreatment serum sodium levels are associated with improved outcomes in mCRC patients receiving aflibercept and FOLFIRI, potentially serving as a prognostic marker to aid treatment management.

Clinical outcomes and response to chemotherapy in a cohort of pancreatic cancer patients with germline variants of unknown significance (VUS) in BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes

PURPOSE

The clinical outcome and the efficacy of chemotherapy in pancreatic cancer patients with BRCA1/2 Variants of Unknown Significance (VUS) is unknown. We explored the effects of chemotherapy with or without Platinum in non metastatic and metastatic pancreatic cancer patients with BRCA1/2 VUS.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of non-metastatic or metastatic pancreatic cancer patients with gBRCA1/2 VUS treated in 13 Italian centers between November 2015 and December 2020 was performed. All patients were assessed for toxicity and RECIST 1.1 response. Metastatic patients were evaluated for survival outcome.

RESULTS

30 pancreatic cancer patients with gBRCA1/2 VUS were considered: 20 were M+ and 10 were non-M+. Pl-CT was recommended to 16 patients: 10 M+ (6 FOLFIRINOX and 4 PAXG) and 6 non-M+ (3 FOLFIRINOX and 3 PAXG); 11 patients received Nabpaclitaxel-Gemcitabine (AG; 8 M+) and 3 patients (2 M+) were treated with Gemcitabine (G). The RECIST 1.1 response rate was 27% for AG and 44% for Pl-CT (22% for (m) FOLFIRINOX and 71% PAXG). 1 year Progression-Free Survival was 37.5% for patients treated with AG and 33% in the Pl-CT subgroup. Median Overall Survival (OS) was 23.5 months for patients treated with AG and 14 months for the Pl-CT subgroup. 1 Year and 2 Year OS were numerically better for AG (1 Year OS: 75% vs 60% and 2 Year OS: 50% and 20% in AG and Pl-CT subgroups, respectively) as well.

CONCLUSIONS

Pl-CT does not seem to be associated with a better outcome compared to AG chemotherapy in PDAC patients with BRCA 1/2 VUS.

The role of nanoliposomal irinotecan plus fluorouracil/leucovorin in the continuum of care of patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

The NAPOLI-I trial showed better outcome of nanoliposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI) plus 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (5-FU/LV) compared to 5-FU/LV in patients with advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma cancer (advPDAC) progressed to gemcitabine-based therapy. This study aims to explore the real-world efficacy and safety of 5-FU/LV-nal-IRI.

METHODS

This is a retrospective multicenter analysis including advPDAC patients receiving 5-FU/LV-nal-IRI after failure of gemcitabine-based therapy. Survival analyses were performed using Kaplan-Meier method, univariate and multivariate analyses by Cox regression.

RESULTS

A total of 296 patients (median age 64.4 years, ECOG PS ≥1 in 56% of cases) were treated at 11 Italian institutions between 2016 and 2018. 34% of them underwent primary tumor resection, and 79% received gemcitabine-nabpaclitaxel as first line. 5-FU/LV-nal-IRI was administered as second-line in 73% of cases. Objective response and disease control rate were 12% and 41%, respectively. Treatment was well tolerated with dose reductions in 50% of patients but no one permanent discontinuation; the commonest grade ≥3 toxicities were neutropenia (14%) and diarrhea (12%). Median PFS and OS from 5-FU/LV-nal-IRI initiation was 3.2 and 7.1 months, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

These real-world data confirm the 5-FU/LV-nal-IRI efficacy and safety in advPDAC patients progressed to gemcitabine-based therapy, with outcomes comparable to NAPOLI-1, even in a less-selected population and with more modern therapeutic algorithm.

Evaluation of Fruquintinib in the Continuum of Care of Patients with Colorectal Cancer

The management of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) has the continuum of care as the treatment paradigm. To date, trifluridine/tipiracil, a biochemically modulated fluoropyrimidine, and regorafenib, a multi-kinase inhibitor, remain the main options for the majority of patients who progressed to standard doublet- or triplet-based chemotherapies, although a tailored approach could be indicated in certain circumstances. Being highly selective for vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR)-1, -2 and -3, fruquintinib demonstrated a strong anti-tumor activity in preclinical models and received approval from China's National Medical Products Administration (NMPA) in 2018 for the treatment of patients with chemo-refractory mCRC. The approval was based on the results of the phase III FRESCO trial. Then, in order to overcome geographic differences in clinical practice, the FRESCO-2 trial was conducted in the US, Europe, Japan, and Australia. In a heavily pretreated patient population, the study met its primary endpoint, demonstrating an advantage of fruquintinib over a placebo in overall survival (OS). Here, we review the clinical development of fruquintinib and its perspectives in gastrointestinal cancers. Then, we discuss the introduction of fruquintinib in the continuum of care of CRC paying special attention to unmet needs, including the identification of cross-resistant and potentially susceptible populations, evaluation of radiological response, and identification of novel biomarkers of clinical benefit.

Guideline Application in Real world: multi-Institutional Based survey of Adjuvant and first-Line pancreatic Ductal adenocarcinoma treatment in Italy. Primary analysis of the GARIBALDI survey

BACKGROUND

Information about the adherence to scientific societies guidelines in the 'real-world' therapeutic management of oncological patients are lacking. This multicenter, prospective survey was aimed to improve the knowledge relative to 2017-2018 recommendations of the Italian Association of Medical Oncology (AIOM).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Treatment-naive adult patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma were enrolled. Group A received adjuvant therapy, group B received primary chemotherapy, and group C had metastatic disease. The results on patients accrued until 31 October 2019 with a mature follow-up were presented.

RESULTS

Since July 2017, 833 eligible patients of 923 (90%) were enrolled in 44 Italian centers. The median age was 69 years (range 36-89 years; 24% >75 years); 48% were female; 93% had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) score of 0 or 1; group A: 16%, group B: 30%; group C: 54%; 72% Nord, 13% Center, 15% South. In group A, guidelines adherence was 68% [95% confidence interval (CI) 59% to 76%]; 53% of patients received gemcitabine and 15% gemcitabine + capecitabine; median CA19.9 was 29 (range 0-7300; not reported 15%); median survival was 36.4 months (95% CI 27.5-47.3 months). In group B, guidelines adherence was 96% (95% CI 92% to 98%); 55% of patients received nab-paclitaxel + gemcitabine, 27% FOLFIRINOX, 12% gemcitabine, and 3% clinical trial; median CA19.9 was 337 (range 0-20220; not reported 9%); median survival was 18.1 months (95% CI 15.6-19.9 months). In group C, guidelines adherence was 96% (95% CI 94% to 98%); 71% of patients received nab-paclitaxel + gemcitabine, 16% gemcitabine, 8% FOLFIRINOX, and 4% clinical trial; liver and lung metastases were reported in 76% and 23% of patients, respectively; median CA19.9 value was 760 (range 0-1374500; not reported 9%); median survival was 10.0 months (95% CI 9.1-11.1 months).

CONCLUSIONS

The GARIBALDI survey shows a very high rate of adherence to guidelines and survival outcome in line with the literature. CA19.9 testing should be enhanced; nutritional and psychological counseling represent an unmet need. Enrollment to assess adherence to updated AIOM guidelines is ongoing.

Systemic Sclerosis Association with Malignancy

The association of systemic sclerosis (SSc) and cancer is well known from several decades suggesting common genetic and environmental risk factors involved in the development of both diseases. Immunosuppressive drugs widely used in SSc may increase the risk of cancer occurrence and different SSc clinical and serological features identify patients at major risk to develop malignancy. In this context, among serological features, presence of anti-RNA polymerase III and anti-topoisomerase I autoantibodies seems to increase cancer frequency in SSc patients (particularly lung and breast cancers). Lung fibrosis and a long standing SSc pulmonary involvement have been largely proposed as lung cancer risk factors, and the exposure to cyclophosphamide and an upper gastrointestinal involvement have been traditionally linked to bladder and oesophagus cancers, respectively. Furthermore, immune checkpoint inhibitors used for cancer therapy can induce immune-related adverse events, which are more frequent and severe in patients with pre-existing autoimmune diseases such as SSc. The strong association between SSc and cancer occurrence steers clinicians to carefully survey SSc patients performing periodical malignancy screening. In the present review, the most relevant bilateral relationships between SSc and cancer will be addressed.

Absolute eosinophil count predicts clinical outcomes and toxicity in non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with immunotherapy

OBJECTIVES

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have led to a paradigm shift in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treatment. We investigated absolute eosinophil count (AEC) as a predictor of clinical outcomes and toxicity in NSCLC patients receiving ICIs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

AEC was retrospectively collected at baseline and during treatment from 158 advanced NSCLC patients treated with single agent anti-PD1/anti-PDL1 monoclonal antibody in first or subsequent line of therapy at Medical Oncology Unit, Careggi University Hospital, Florence (Italy), between January 2016 to October 2020.

RESULTS

We found a significant association between high baseline AEC (≥130/μL) and better clinical outcomes. The response rates were 64.4% and 35.6% for patients with high and low AEC, respectively (p = 0.009). The high-AEC group showed a significantly longer PFS and OS than the low-AEC group (mPFS = 7.0 months, 95% CI 5.0-10.0 vs 2.5 months, 95% CI 2.0-4.0, p = 0.007 and mOS = 9.0 months, CI 95% 7.0-15.0 vs 5.5 months, 95% CI 4.0-8.0, p = 0.009, respectively). An increased risk of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) was reported in the high-AEC group (p = 0.133). IrAEs resulted an independent prognostic factor for both better outcomes (mPFS = 8.0 months, 95% CI 7.0-12.0 vs 2.0 months, 95% CI 2.0-3.0, p<0.001; mOS = 13.0 months 95% CI 9.0-19.0 vs 4.0 months 95% CI 3.0-6-0, p<0.001) and response to ICIs (response rate = 33.8% vs 14.9%, disease control rate = 72.0% vs 32.1%, p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

High baseline AEC value (≥130/μL) is a predictive biomarker of clinical benefit and irAEs occurrence in NSCLC patients treated with ICIs.

Modified FOLFOXIRI plus panitumumab (mFOLFOXIRI/PAN) versus mFOLFOX6/PAN as initial treatment of patients with unresectable RAS and BRAF wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): Results of the phase III randomized TRIPLETE study by GONO

LBA3505

Background: The association of a chemotherapy doublet (FOLFOX/FOLFIRI) with an anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody (cetuximab or panitumumab) is an upfront option for the treatment of RAS and BRAF wt mCRC patients. Phase II studies investigating the combination of the triplet FOLFOXIRI with an anti-EGFR reported promising activity results and an acceptable safety profile when lower doses of 5FU and irinotecan were adopted. The added value of intensifying the upfront chemotherapy when combined with a targeted agent in a molecularly selected population is not established. Methods: TRIPLETE is a prospective, open label, phase III trial in which previously untreated patients with unresectable RAS and BRAF wt mCRC were randomized to receive mFOLFOX6/pan (arm A) or mFOLFOXIRI (irinotecan 150 mg/sqm, oxaliplatin 85 mg/sqm, L-leucovorin 200 mg/sqm, 5-fluoruracil 2400 mg/sqm 48 h infusion)/pan (arm B) up to 12 cycles, followed by 5FU/LV/pan until disease progression. The primary endpoint is overall response rate (ORR) according to RECIST 1.1 criteria. Secondary endpoints include safety profile, R0 resection rate, PFS and OS. Under the assumption of an ORR of 60% in arm A, to detect an increase of at least 15% in arm B, a sample size of 432 cases provided approximately 90% power to a two-sided chi square test for heterogeneity at the 0.05 significance level. Results: From September 2017 to September 2021, 435 pts were enrolled (arm A/B: 217/218) in 67 Italian sites. Main pts’ characteristics were (arm A/B): median age 59/59, ECOG PS 0 80%/84%, left-sided 88%/88%, synchronous metastases 88%/87%, prior adjuvant 2%/6%, resected primary 43%/51%, liver-only 37%/39%. Main grade > 2 adverse events were diarrhoea 7%/23%, stomatitis 7%/7%, neutropenia 20%/32%, febrile neutropenia 3%/6%, fatigue 2%/7%, skin rash 29%/19%. 160 (73%) out of 218 patients in arm B and 165 (76%) out of 217 patients in arm A achieved RECIST response (OR 0.87, 95%CI 0.56-1.34, p=0.526). No interaction effect between treatment arm and disease spread (liver-limited vs not-liver limited) was evident. No differences in early tumor shrinkage (arm A/B 58%/57%, p=0.878) and deepness of response (median arm A/B: 47%/48%, p=0.845) were reported, nor in R0 resection rate (arm A/B 29%/25%, p=0.317). At a median follow up of 26.5 mos, 305 (arm A/B: 157/148) PFS events were collected, with no significant difference between arms (median PFS: 12.7 vs 12.3 months, HR: 0.88, 95%CI 0.70-1.11, p=0.277). Conclusions: The intensification of the upfront chemotherapy backbone in combination with panitumumab in molecularly selected and mostly (88%) left-sided mCRC patients does not provide any benefit in terms of treatment activity at the price of a non-negligible increase in gastrointestinal toxicity. Clinical trial information: NCT03231722.

Isoforms of the orphan nuclear receptor COUP‑TFII differentially modulate pancreatic cancer progression

The expression of the nuclear receptor transcription factor (TF) COUP-TFII is broadly associated with cell differentiation and cancer development, including of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), a devastating disease with one of the poorest prognoses among cancers worldwide. Recent studies have started to investigate the pathological and physiological roles of a novel COUP-TFII isoform (COUP-TFII_V2) that lacks the DNA-binding domain. As the role of the canonical COUP-TFII in PDAC was previously demonstrated, the present study evaluated whether COUP-TFII_V2 may have a functional role in PDAC. It was demonstrated that COUP-TFII_V2 naturally occurs in PDAC cells and in primary samples, where its expression is consistent with shorter overall survival and peripheral invasion. Of note, COUP-TFII_V2, exhibiting nuclear and cytosolic expression, is linked to epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT) and cancer progression, as confirmed by nude mouse experiments. The present results demonstrated that COUP-TFII_V2 distinctively regulates the EMT of PDAC and, similarly to its sibling, it is associated with tumor aggressiveness. The two isoforms have both overlapping and exclusive functions that cooperate with cancer growth and dissemination. By studying how PDAC cells switch from one isoform to the other, novel insight into cancer biology was gained, indicating that this receptor may serve as a novel possible target for PDAC management.

Results of the observational prospective RealFLOT study

BACKGROUND

Perioperative FLOT (5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin and docetaxel) has recently become the gold standard treatment for fit patients with operable gastric (GC) or gastroesophageal (GEJ) adenocarcinoma, getting a 5-year overall survival (OS) of 45%, over 23% with surgery alone.

METHODS

RealFLOT is an Italian, multicentric, observational trial, collecting data from patients with resectable GC or GEJ adenocarcinoma treated with perioperative FLOT. Aim of the study was to describe feasibility and safety of FLOT, pathological complete response rate (pCR), surgical outcomes and overall response rate (ORR) in an unselected real-world population. Additional analyses evaluated the correlation between pCR and survival and the prognostic role of microsatellite instability (MSI) status.

RESULTS

Of 206 patients enrolled that received perioperative FLOT at 15 Italian centers, 124 (60.2%) received at least 4 full-dose cycles, 190 (92.2%) underwent surgery, and 142 (68.9%) started the postoperative phase. Among patients who started the postoperative phase, 105 (51.0%) received FLOT, while 37 (18%) received de-intensified regimens, depending on clinical condition or previous toxicities. pCR was achieved in 7.3% of cases. Safety profile was consistent with literature. Neutropenia was the most common G 3-4 adverse event (AE): 19.9% in the preoperative phase and 16.9% in the postoperative phase. No toxic death was observed and 30-day postoperative mortality rate was 1.0%. ORR was 45.6% and disease control rate (DCR) was 94.2%. Disease-free survival (DFS) and OS were significantly longer in case of pCR (p = 0.009 and p = 0.023, respectively). A trend towards better DFS was observed among MSI-H patients.

CONCLUSIONS

These real-world data confirm the feasibility of FLOT in an unselected population, representative of the clinical practice. pCR rate was lower than expected, nevertheless we confirm pCR as a predictive parameter of survival. In addition, MSI-H status seems to be a positive prognostic marker also in patients treated with taxane-containing triplets.

Chemotherapy toxicity and activity in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and germline BRCA1-2 pathogenic variants (gBRCA1-2pv): a multicenter survey

BACKGROUND

Germline BRCA1-2 pathogenic variants (gBRCA1-2pv)-related pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) showed increased sensitivity to DNA cross-linking agents. This study aimed at exploring safety profile, dose intensity, and activity of different chemotherapy regimens in this setting.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

gBRCA1-2pv PDAC patients of any age and clinical tumor stage who completed a first course of chemotherapy were eligible. A descriptive analysis of chemotherapy toxicity, dose intensity, response, and survival outcomes was performed.

RESULTS

A total of 85 gBRCA1-2pv PDAC patients treated in 21 Italian centers between December 2008 and March 2021were enrolled. Seventy-four patients were assessable for toxicity and dose intensity, 83 for outcome. Dose intensity was as follows: nab-paclitaxel 72%, gemcitabine 76% (AG); cisplatin 75%, nab-paclitaxel 73%, capecitabine 73%, and gemcitabine 65% (PAXG); fluorouracil 35%, irinotecan 58%, and oxaliplatin 64% (FOLFIRINOX). When compared with the literature, grade 3-4 neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and diarrhea were increased with PAXG, and unmodified with AG and FOLFIRINOX. RECIST responses were numerically higher with the three- (81%) or four-drug (73%) platinum-containing regimens that outperformed AG (41%) and oxaliplatin-based doublets (56%). Carbohydrate antigen 19.9 (CA19.9) reduction >89% at nadir was reported in two-third of metastatic patients treated with triplets and quadruplets, as opposed to 33% and 45% of patients receiving oxaliplatin-based doublets or AG, respectively. All patients receiving AG experienced disease progression, with a median progression-free survival (mPFS) of 6.4 months, while patients treated with platinum-containing triplets or quadruplets had an mPFS >10.8 months. Albeit still immature, data on overall survival seemed to parallel those on PFS.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data, as opposed to figures expected from the literature, highlighted that platinum-based regimens provoked an increased toxicity on proliferating cells, when dose intensity was maintained, or an as-expected toxicity, when dose intensity was reduced, while no change in toxicity and dose intensity was evident with AG. Furthermore, an apparently improved outcome of platinum-based triplets or quadruplets over other regimens was observed.

Association of Systemic Steroid Treatment and Outcome in Patients Treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Real-World Analysis

Background: Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) are inflammatory side effects, which can occur during immune-checkpoint(s) inhibitors (ICIs) therapy. Steroids are the first-line agents to manage irAEs because of their immunosuppressive properties. However, it is still debated whether or when steroids can be administered without abrogating the therapeutic efforts of immunotherapy. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 146 patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), melanoma and renal cell carcinoma (RCC) treated with ICIs. We assessed the progression-free survival (PFS) of patients treated with steroids due to an irAE compared to a no-steroid group. Results: The early treatment with steroid (within the first 30 days from the beginning of immunotherapy) was not related to a shorter PFS (p = 0.077). Interestingly, patients who were treated with steroids after 30 days from the start of immunotherapy had significantly longer PFS (p = 0.017). In a multivariate analysis, treatment with steroids after 30 days was an independent prognostic factor for PFS (HR: 0.59 [95% CI 0.36–0.97], p = 0.037). Conclusions: This retrospective study points out that early systemic steroids administration to manage irAEs might not have a detrimental effect on patient clinical outcome in NSCLC, melanoma and RCC patients.

Aflibercept Plus FOLFIRI as Second-Line Treatment for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Single-Institution Real-Life Experience

Simple Summary

The continuum of care for mCRC might include anti-angiogenic drug as anti-VEGF/VEGFR moAb and recombinant proteins in combination with fluoropyrimidine-based regimens in first- and second-line treatment, and multikinase inhibitors in refractory patients. The addition of aflibercept to FOLFIRI has been demonstrated to improve survival in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) who progressed after receiving a standard oxaliplatin-based regimen. In this retrospective, single-institution, observational study we collected clinical data from mCRC patients who received aflibercept in combination with FOLFIRI in routine clinical practice to describe feasibility and efficacy of this regimen in a real-world population. Aflibercept-FOLFIRI is a feasible second-line treatment for mCRC in a real-life setting, and PFS in first-line therapy >12 months resulted as the only predictive marker of better survival.

Abstract

The addition of aflibercept to FOLFIRI has been demonstrated to improve survival in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) who progressed after receiving a standard oxaliplatin-based regimen. In this retrospective, single-institution, observational study we collected clinical data from mCRC patients who received aflibercept in combination with FOLFIRI in routine clinical practice from October 2012 to March 2021 to describe feasibility and efficacy of this regimen in a real-world population. Forty-nine patients receiving aflibercept-FOLFIRI as second-line treatment were identified, 40.8% of whom were aged over 65 years. The majority of patients had multi-organ metastases (73.5%), and had previously received bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy (CT) as first-line treatment (79.6%). Median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were 13 and 6 months, respectively; overall response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were 12.3% and 49.1%, respectively. Several factors were associated with survival in univariate analysis, including PFS in first-line therapy, number of metastatic sites, bone metastases and others. However, in multivariate analysis, only PFS in first-line CT over 12 months was significantly associated with better OS (HR 0.32; 95% CI 0.13–0.79; p = 0.01). Hypertension was the most commonly reported grade (G) 3–4 adverse event (AE), affecting 18.4% of the overall population. Thromboembolic events were observed in 16.3% of patients, hemorrhagic events in 10.2%, and proteinuria in 8.2%. Neutropenia was the most frequently observed hematological G3–4 AE with an incidence of 10.2%. Aflibercept-FOLFIRI has been confirmed as a feasible second-line treatment for mCRC in a re-al-life setting, and PFS in first-line therapy >12 months resulted as the only predictive marker of better survival.

Activity and Safety of NAB-FOLFIRI and NAB-FOLFOX as First-Line Treatment for metastatic Pancreatic Cancer (NabucCO Study)

BACKGROUND

Relevant improvement in first-line treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPC) was provided by FOLFIRINOX and by gemcitabine (gem) plus nab-paclitaxel (Nab-p) regimens. Regardless of the first-line treatment survival benefit, most patients survive less than 1 year.

AIM

The objectives of this multicenter phase I/II study were to evaluate as first-line chemotherapy (CT) two modified regimens of FOLFIRINOX, replacing either oxaliplatin (Oxa) or irinotecan with Nab-p, in patients with mPC.

METHODS

The primary objectives of phase 1 were the definition of the dose limit binations, while for phase II they were the characterization of safety and activity of Nab-FOLFIRI and Nab-FOLFOX in mPC.

RESULTS

Sixty-three patients received Nab-FOLFIRI or Nab-FOLFOX in phase I. We defined MTD at 120 mg/m² for Nab-p with FOLFIRI and 160 mg/m² with FOLFOX. In phase II, we randomized 42 patients for each arm with the following results: (1) overall response rate (ORR) was 31% for both schedules; (2) a clinical benefit rate (CBR) of 69% and 71%; (3) 1-year survival was 41% and 50%; (4) progression free survival (PFS) was 6 months and 5.6 months; (5) median overall survival (OS) was 10.2 and 10.4 months for Nab-FOLFIRI and Nab-FOLFOX, respectively. (6) Neutropenia was the most common grade ≥3 adverse event in our regimens, significantly lower than that reported for the FOLFIRINOX triplet.

CONCLUSION

Nab-FOLFIRI and Nab-FOLFOX might be hopeful first-line CT options for mPC patients, with promising activity and a good safety profile.

Absolute eosinophil count as predictive biomarker of irAEs in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs)

345

Background: Nivolumab and ipilimumab are associated with immune-related adverse events (irAEs) and, to date, few biomarkers predictive of ICIs toxicity are reported in mRCC. Methods: We conducted a single-center, observational, retrospective study at Clinical Oncology Unit, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy. We evaluated 43 patients (pts) with mRCC treated with ICIs from April 2013 to May 2020. Absolute Eosinophil Counts (AEC, N°/μL) were registered at baseline and at time of occurrence of irAEs. This study aims to evaluate whether the AEC could be a predictive biomarker of irAEs in patients with mRCC treated with ICIs. Results: Median age was 65 years and males were 81.4%. 10 pts received Nivolumab+Ipilimumab, while 33 pts received Nivolumab single agent. 74.4% pts (32/43) developed at least 1 irAE, 11.6% with G3-G4 irAEs. The most frequent first irAE was endocrine event (40.6% pts; 37.5% with hypo-/hyper-thyroidism). The baseline mean AEC was 163.1/μL in our cohort, in particular 132.2/μL in pts who did not develop irAEs and 176.7/μL in pts who developed irAEs (p=0.134). Among the pts who developed irAEs, the mean AEC was lower in pts with G1-G2 (153.1/μL) than in those with G3-G4 (330/μL; p=0.0013) irAEs. At the time of onset of the first irAE, the mean AEC increased to 247/μL (Δ 140.1%). Analyzing the trend of AEC from baseline to time of occurrence of irAE for the 32 pts who had developed at least one irAE, 53.1% (17 pts) showed an increasing trend; among these pts, the most frequent irAEs were endocrine occurring in 4/17 pts (23.6%). An increasing trend was also observed in the majority of pts who developed G1-2 (14/27, 51.9%) and G3-4 (3/5, 60.0%) irAEs. Additional analyzes are ongoing to identify appropriate cut-offs of AEC to better stratify patients. Conclusions: There is little evidence in the literature about the potential role of absolute eosinophil counts as a predictive biomarker of irAEs in patients with solid tumors treated with ICIs, and most refer to patients with melanoma. In this study we observed that the baseline AEC values in patients that will develop irAEs are higher than in those without irAEs and, among the former, the values are lower for patients with toxicity G1-G2 vs G3-G4. We also found an increase of the mean AEC from baseline to the onset of the first irAE. Of the patients who experience toxicity, most have an upward trend in AEC at the onset of the first irAE. Compatibly with all the limitations of a retrospective analysis, our is the first experience exploring the role of the eosinophil count in the development of irAEs in mRCC patients treated with ICIs, and a prospective study is ongoing in our Unit to confirm the role of the eosinophil count in patients treated with ICIs.

Clinical Practice Guidelines for Diagnosis, Treatment and Follow-Up of Exocrine Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: Evidence Evaluation and Recommendations by the Italian Association of Medical Oncology (AIOM)

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death in women (7%) and the sixth in men (5%) in Italy, with a life expectancy of around 5% at 5 years. From 2010, the Italian Association of Medical Oncology (AIOM) developed national guidelines for several cancers. In this report, we report a summary of clinical recommendations of diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of PDAC, which may guide physicians in their current practice. A panel of AIOM experts in upper gastrointestinal cancer malignancies discussed the available scientific evidence supporting the clinical recommendations.

Association of high TUBB3 with resistance to adjuvant docetaxel-based chemotherapy in gastric cancer: translational study of ITACA-S

BACKGROUND

No predictive markers for chemotherapy activity have been validated in gastric cancer (GC). The potential value of class III β-tubulin (TUBB3) as biomarker for prognosis and resistance to taxane-based therapy was reported.

METHODS

We analyzed GC samples of patients enrolled in the Intergroup Trial of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Adenocarcinoma of the Stomach (ITACA-S), a randomized adjuvant study comparing 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (5-FU/LV) and docetaxel-based sequential chemotherapy. TUBB3 was quantitated by selected reaction monitoring mass spectrometry and patients were stratified using a threshold of 750 attomoles per microgram (amol/µg). Cox proportional modeling and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis were used to assess the impact of TUBB3 expression on overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival.

RESULTS

Patients with TUBB3 protein levels >750 and <750 amol/µg were 21.9% and 78.1%, respectively, and were well-balanced between treatment arms. TUBB3 protein levels were not prognostic. Whereas no survival differences according to the 2 arms were observed in the subgroup with low TUBB3 expression (5-year OS 47% vs 40%; p = 0.44), patients with high TUBB3 had a clinically meaningful poorer OS when receiving docetaxel-based versus 5-FU/LV chemotherapy (5-year OS 31% vs 54%; p = 0.09), with a statistically significant interaction between TUBB3 and treatment (p = 0.049).

CONCLUSIONS

The quantification of TUBB3 might be considered as a negative predictive biomarker of benefit from taxane-based therapy in GC. Studies are needed to evaluate its role in the neoadjuvant setting.

Perioperative FLOT in elderly patients with resectable gastric cancer: Subgroup analysis from the observational RealFLOT study

4548

Background: The treatment strategy for patients with resectable gastric cancer changed in the last few years with perioperative treatments. FLOT regimen (fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, docetaxel) turned out to be feasible and effective, offering significant improvement in survival outcomes. However, the safety profile of triplet therapies for elderly patients deserves a special attention and, consequently, the best treatment strategy for these patients is still debated. Methods: Focusing on the elderly patient population (age ≥65 years), real-world data from patients with resectable gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma (T≥2 and/or N+) enrolled in the observational RealFLOT study were collected. Results: A total of 206 patients with resectable gastric or GEJ adenocarcinoma received perioperative FLOT at 15 Italian centers in routine clinical practice, between September 2016 and September 2019. The median age was 63 years (range 36-77) and 43% of patients enrolled (n = 89) were ≥65 years. Among elderly patients, 46 (52%) received FLOT for at least 4 full-dose cycles in the preoperative phase, 82 (92%) underwent surgery, and 56 (62%) started the postoperative phase. The primary end point of the study, pathological complete response (pCR) rate, was similar among patients aged ≥65 and < 65 (6.7% vs 7.7%, respectively). The distribution of pathological stages did not differ according to age (p = 0.473), and disease-free survival (DFS) is unrelated to the age of patients (log-rank 0.57; p = 0.89). The incidence of grade (G) 3-4 adverse events (AEs) was similar in the two age groups (Table) and the 30-day mortality rates after surgery did not differ according to age. Conclusions: FLOT regimen demonstrated to be feasible and safe in elderly patients since no differences were observed in terms of pCR, DFS and safety profile according to age. [Table: see text]

Perioperative FLOT in resectable gastric cancer: Italian real-world data from the RealFLOT study

300

Background: Perioperative treatments have significantly improved survival in patients with resectable gastric cancer, increasing 5-year overall survival from 23% with surgery alone to 45% with FLOT (fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, docetaxel). Pathological regression is a prognostic marker of better survival. Methods: In this observational, retro- and prospective study we collected data from patients with resectable gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma treated, as clinical practice, with perioperative FLOT. All patients had clinical T2 or higher and/or nodal involvement, according to FLOT4-AIO trial. Results: A total of 206 patients received perioperative chemotherapy with FLOT at 15 Italian centres, between September 2016 and September 2019. Overall, 186 (90.3%) patients completed the preoperative phase, 190 (92%) underwent surgery, and 142 (68.9%) started the postoperative phase. Among patients who started the postoperative phase, 105 (51.0%) received FLOT, while 37 (18%) received less intensive regimens (e.g. FOLFOX or De Gramont), depending on performance status after surgery or toxicity in the preoperative phase. Pathological complete response (pCR) was obtained in 7.3% of cases. In the preoperative phase, grade (G) 3-4 hematological and gastrointestinal adverse events (AEs) were reported in 42 (20.4%) and 13 (6.3%) patients, respectively. Conclusions: These real data confirmed the feasibility of perioperative FLOT in a less-selected population, representative of the clinical practice. The pCR rate was lower than in the FLOT4-AIO trial. The survival outcomes, potential predictive or prognostic factors and comprehensive safety data will be included in the final analysis.

[Table: see text]

Observational retrospective evaluation of treatment with liposomal irinotecan plus fluorouracil/leucovorin for metastatic pancreatic cancer patients: An Italian large real-world analysis

660

Background: In the NAPOLI I phase III trial, Nanoliposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI) plus 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (5-FU/LV) showed better outcome compared to 5FU/LV in patients with metastatic Pancreatic Cancer (MPC) progressed to 1st- line gemcitabine-based therapy. Aim of this study is to explore the real-world efficacy and safety of 5FU/LV-nal-IRI by a compassionate use programme and to identify potential prognostic factors that could affect survival in this setting. Methods: This is a retrospective multi-center analysis including patients with MPC who received 5FU/LV-nal-IRI after failure of a gemcitabine-based therapy. Survival analyses were carried out by the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed by using the log-rank test and the Cox regression. Results: A total of 296 pts (median age, 69 years, range 30-82; 50% male; ECOG PS 0, 44%) were treated at 11 Italian institutions from June 2016 and November 2018. 34% of the pts have been previously resected on their primary tumor, and 76% received gemcitabine-nabpaclitaxel as 1st - line treatment. 5FU/LV-nal-IRI has been administered as 2nd - line in 72% of the pts, while in 23% of the cases as 3rd - line or more. The median OS was 7.1 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 6.1 - 8.1] and the median PFS was 3.3 months (95% CI 2.9 - 3.6). At six months, OS and PFS rate were 53.4% and 31.4% respectively. ORR was 12% and DCR was 40%. 52% of pts received more than 4 cycle with dose reduction in 148 pts (50%). Most common grade 3 toxicities were neutropenia (14%), diarrhea (11%), anemia (3%), nausea (3%), fatigue (3%), mucositis (2%) and vomiting (1%). Baseline characteristics associated with better OS were ECOG PS 0, normal CEA, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio ≤5 and haemoglobin ≥11 g/dL. Conclusions: These real-world data confirm the efficacy and safety of 5FU/LV-nal-IRI in patients with MPC progressed to a gemcitabine-based therapy, with outcome comparable to NAPOLI-1 even in a less selected population and with more active 1st - line combination therapy. In this cohort, well known prognostic markers has been confirmed, as expected.

Assessment of ramucirumab plus paclitaxel as switch maintenance versus continuation of first-line chemotherapy in patients (pts) with advanced HER2-negative gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancers: The ARMANI phase III trial

TPS4151

Background: Platinum/fluoropyrimidine regimens are the backbone of first-line therapy for advanced gastric cancer (AGC). The optimal duration of first-line therapy is still unknown and its continuation until disease progression represents the standard. However this strategy is often associated with cumulative toxicity and rapid development of drug resistance. Moreover, only 40% of AGC pts are eligible for second-line treatment. This study aims at assessing whether switch maintenance to ramucirumab plus paclitaxel will extend the progression-free survival (PFS) of subjects with HER-2 negative AGC who have not progressed after a first-line with a platinum/fluoropyrimidine regimen. The hypothesis is that the early administration of an active, non-cross resistant regimen may delay disease progression and, consequently, improve pts’ quality of life. This strategy may also rescue all those subjects that become ineligible for a second-line therapy due to the rapid clinical deterioration. Methods: This is a randomized, open-label, multicenter, phase III trial. Eligibility criteria are: unresectable/metastatic HER-2 negative AGC or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancer; ECOG PS 0-1; measurable and/or evaluable disease by RECIST v1.1; no progression after 3 months of therapy with either FOLFOX4, mFOLFOX6 or XELOX . The primary endpoint is to compare PFS of pts in ARM A (continuation of the same first-line therapy with oxaliplatin/fluoropyrimidine) versus ARM B (switch maintenance to ramucirumab and placlitaxel). Secondary endpoints are: overall survival, time-to-treatment failure, overall response rate, duration of response, percentage of pts receiving a second-line therapy per treatment arm, safety and quality of life. Exploratory analyses to identify primary resistance and prognosis biomarkers are planned, including Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) on archival tumor tissues. The ARMANI study is sponsored by the Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori and it is ongoing at 29 Italian centers with a planned population of 280 pts. Clinical trial information: NCT02934464.

Vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A) amplification and long-term response to ramucirumab (ram) in metastatic gastric cancer (mGC): The VERA study

3143

Background: The anti-VEGFR-2 monoclonal antibody ram, alone or with paclitaxel, is a cornerstone of second-line treatment of mGC. Even if about half patients do not benefit from ram, no predictive biomarkers have been identified so far. In TCGA, VEGF-A amplification was found in 7% of cases, almost exclusively in chromosomal instability subtype. We hypothesize that VEGF-A amplification in tumor cells could lead to autocrine/paracrine stimulation of tumor growth beside angiogenesis, potentially identifying a patients’ subgroup with exceptional responses to ram. Methods: VERA was a multicentric, prospective study based on a translational hypothesis. mGC patients were included according to the following criteria: 1) complete (CR) or partial response (PR) to single-agent ram; 2) >6 months PFS to single-agent ram; 3) >10 months PFS to paclitaxel+ram. According to a Fleming single-stage design, hypothesizing a prevalence of VEGF-A amplification of 1% and 15% among all-comers and exceptional responders, 20 exceptional responders were required to reject the null hypothesis of low prevalence of VEGF-A amplification, with alpha- and beta- errors of 0.05 and 0.10, respectively. VEGF-A amplification (defined as >10% tumor cells with ≥10 VEGF-A copies, variably sized signal clusters or a ratio of VEGF-A gene to centromere of ≥2) was centrally assessed through fluorescent in situ hybridization on pre-treatment FFPE tumor tissue. Results: At 7 Italian Centers, we included 20 patients satisfying the 1st (n=1), 2nd (n=2), or 3rd (n=17) criterion. Clinical-pathological features were: M/F, 11/9; median age 63 years; gastric/GEJ, 17/3; intestinal/diffuse, 14/6, HER2+/HER2-, 4/16. Median PFS and overall survival to ram-based treatment were 15.6 and 25.7 months, with best response: CR/PR/SD, 0/10/10. VERA met its primary endpoint, revealing 3/20 (15%) tumors with VEGF-A amplification (1 case presenting big clusters, 1 small clusters and 1 with >10% tumor cells with ≥10 VEGF-A copies). Conclusions: Validation analyses of first- and second-line randomized trials could confirm VEGF-A amplification as a biomarker of long-term response to ram-based treatment in mGC patients, advancing treatment personalization.

Ramucirumab as Second-Line Therapy in Metastatic Gastric Cancer: Real-World Data from the RAMoss Study

BACKGROUND

Ramucirumab-alone or combined with paclitaxel-represents one of the main options for patients failing first-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer.

OBJECTIVE

The RAMoss study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy profile of ramucirumab in the "real-life setting".

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients from 25 Italian hospitals started therapy consisting of ramucirumab 8 mg/kg i.v. d1,15q28 with or without paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 i.v. d1,8,15q28. The primary endpoint was safety, and secondary endpoints were overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

One hundred sixty-seven patients with disease progression on first-line therapy received ramucirumab as monotherapy (10%) or combined with paclitaxel (90%). Median treatment duration was 4 months (1-17 months). Global incidence of grade (G) 3-4 toxicity was 9.6%, and for neutropenia 5.4%; treatment was discontinued due to toxicity in 3% of patients. The most frequent adverse events (AE) were G1-2 fatigue (27.5%), G1-2 neuropathy (26.3%), and G1-2 neutropenia (14.9%). ORR was 20.2%. Stable disease was observed in 39.2% of patients, with a disease control rate of 59.4%. With a median follow-up of 11 months, median PFS was 4.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 4.1-4.7), whereas median OS was 8.0 months (95% CI: 7.09-8.9). In a multivariate analysis, ECOG performance status <1 or ≥1 (HR 1.13, 95% CI 1.0-1.27, p = 0.04) and the presence versus absence of peritoneal metastases (HR 1.57, 95% CI 1.63-2.39, p = 0.03) were independent poor prognostic factors.

CONCLUSIONS

These "real-life" efficacy data on ramucirumab treatment are in line with previous randomized trials. Ramucirumab is well tolerated in daily clinical practice.

Activity and safety of Nab-FOLFIRI and Nab-FOLFOX as first-line treatment for metastatic pancreatic cancer (phase II NabucCO study)

351

Background: FOLFIRINOX is an approved regimen for metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPC). We performed a modification in FOLFIRINOX schedule, using nab-paclitaxel (nab-p) to obtain two regimens that could be as effective and less toxic than the original triplet. NabucCO study was a randomized phase II trial to assess activity and toxicity of nab-p instead of either oxaliplatin (Nab-FOLFIRI) or irinotecan (Nab-FOLFOX) in first line setting. Previous dose–finding NabucCO study defined that maximum tolerated dose of nab-p with FOLFIRI is 120 mg/m2, and with FOLFOX is 160 mg/m2. Methods: The study was a 1:1 parallel arm, open label, not comparative one to assess overall response rate (ORR) of Nab-FOLFIRI and Nab-FOLFOX as primary end-point. Patients (pts) with PS 0-1, untreated for mPC were randomized to receive leucovorin 400 mg/m2, 5FU bolus 400 mg/m2, 5FU 48h ci 2400 mg/m2, irinotecan 180 mg/m2 plus nab-p 120 mg/m2 (arm A) or leucovorin 400 mg/m2, 5FU bolus 400 mg/m2, 5FU 48h ci 2400 mg/m2 and oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 iv plus nab-p 160 mg/m2 (arm B) every 2 weeks for up to 12 cycles. Secondary end points were clinical benefit rate (CBR), progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Results: From November 2015 to January 2017, 84 pts were treated (42 for each arm). Median age was 60 years (29-65) in arm A and 64 years (47-64) in arm B. The ORR was 31 % for both schedules, with a CBR of 69% and 71%, respectively. At a median follow-up of 11.4 months for arm A and 14.5 months for arm B (censored on august, 31th 2017), 1-year survival is 41% and 50%, respectively. For Nab-FOLFIRI PFS and mOS were 6 months (90% CI: 4.9-8.0) and 13.2 months (90% CI: 8.3-14.8), while in Nab-FOLFOX were 5.6 months (90% CI:4.9-7.2) and 10.8 months (90% CI: 8.4-12.8). Grade ≥3 toxicities in arm A were neutropenia (19%) and febrile neutropenia (12%). In arm B, main grade ≥3 toxicities were neutropenia (29%), fatigue (14%), peripheral neuropathy (7%). No toxic death were registered. Conclusions: Nab-FOLFIRI and Nab–FOLFOX demonstrated a similar activity to FOLFIRINOX, with better safety profile in terms of neutropenia, fatigue and neuropathy. These results could justify a future phase III evaluation. Clinical trial information: NCT02109341.

Biomarkers of Primary Resistance to Trastuzumab in HER2-Positive Metastatic Gastric Cancer Patients: the AMNESIA Case-Control Study

Purpose: Refining the selection of HER2-positive metastatic gastric cancer patient candidates for trastuzumab is a challenge of precision oncology. Preclinical studies have suggested several genomic mechanisms of primary resistance, leading to activation of tyrosine kinase receptors other than HER2 or downstream signaling pathways.Experimental Design: We carried out this multicenter, prospective, case-control study to demonstrate the negative predictive impact of a panel of candidate genomic alterations (AMNESIA panel), including EGFR/MET/KRAS/PI3K/PTEN mutations and EGFR/MET/KRAS amplifications. Hypothesizing a prevalence of candidate alterations of 30% and 0% in resistant and sensitive HER2-positive patients, respectively, 20 patients per group were needed.Results: AMNESIA panel alterations were significantly more frequent in resistant (11 of 20, 55%) as compared with sensitive (0% of 17) patients (P < 0.001), and in HER2 IHC 2⁺ (7 of 13, 53.8%) than 3⁺ (4 of 24, 16.7%) tumors (P = 0.028). Patients with tumors bearing no candidate alterations had a significantly longer median progression-free [5.2 vs. 2.6 months; HR, 0.34; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.07-0.48; P = 0.001] and overall survival (16.1 vs. 7.6 months; HR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.09-0.75; P = 0.015). The predictive accuracy of the AMNESIA panel and HER2 IHC was 76% and 65%, respectively. The predictive accuracy of the combined evaluation of the AMNESIA panel and HER2 IHC was 84%.Conclusions: Our panel of candidate genomic alterations may be clinically useful to predict primary resistance to trastuzumab in patients with HER2-positive metastatic gastric cancer and should be further validated with the aim of molecularly stratifying HER2-addicted cancers for the development of novel treatment strategies. Clin Cancer Res; 24(5); 1082-9. ©2017 AACR.

Osteonecrosis of the Jaw and Angiogenesis inhibitors: A Revival of a Rare but Serous Side Effect

Osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) is a rare treatment related side effect that was firstly described in 2002 through a case report in metastatic bone cancer patient treated with bisphosphonates (BPs) therapy. ONJ is defined as an eight weeks or longer clinical finding of exposed bone in the oral cavity without response to appropriate therapy. The diagnosis is mainly clinical but often requires a radiological confirmation with an orthopantomography. So it must be made by a dental specialist with sufficient experience on ONJ and requires a detailed anamnestic exploration of comorbidities and treatments history. In particular, ONJ affects a wide number of oncologic patients treated with BPs for bone metastatic cancers and, more recently, with anti-angiogenic drugs. The aim of this this paper is to describe diagnosis and classification of this rare but serious side effect and its pathophysiology. In particular, we provide a detailed description of clinical evidences upon the relationship between anti-angiogenic drugs and ONJ. Considering the evolving of cancer epidemiology with a greater number of cancer surviving patients, this side effect always deserves more attention. We conclude that ONJ must be always carefully investigated and prevented with a multidisciplinary approach involving oncologist, radiation oncologist and skilled dental practitioner when a cancer patient must begin a BP or an antiangiogenic treatment.

Nab-paclitaxel (Nab-P) and gemcitabine (G) first-line chemotherapy (CT) in patients (pts) with metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPC) who relapsed after adjuvant treatment (ADJ T): A “REAL LIFE” study

396

Background: Nab-P and G represents a standard of care in first line mPC treatment. Only 5% of pts in Nab-P + G arm received ADJ T in the MPACT phase III trial. Accordingly, there is a lack of information about Nab-P + G benefit in this population. Aim of this analysis was to evaluate outcomes in mPC “real life” pts receiving first-line Nab-P + G after relapsing from ADJ T. Methods: Clinical records of 330 mPC pts receiving Nab-P + G with standard schedule as first line CT were retrospectively reviewed, investigating, efficacy (Progression Free Survival, PFS and Overall Survival, OS defined as time elapsed from the start of Nab-P + G to progression or death respectively) in pts treated with prior ADJ T. Analysis was then performed in ADJ T subgroup according disease free survival (DFS) cut-off ( ≤ 6 vs 6-12 vs ≥ 12 months). OS and PFS were estimated with Kaplan-Meyer method with 95% CI. Cox-regression model was applied to the data with univariate and multivariate approach. Results: At time of data analysis in the entire cohort median (m) OS was 11.3 months (95% CI 9.157-13.443); mPFS 7 months (95% CI 5.827-8.173). 90 out of 330 pts (27.3%) had received G-based ADJ T with mDFS of 29.2 months (95% CI 25.62-32.78). In the overall population at multivariate analysis, ADJ treatment was an independent prognostic factor related to better OS (HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.40-0.66; p < 0.001) and PFS (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.49-0.89; p = 0.024). Median OS in ADJ T pts was significantly higher than pts who had not received ADJ T (15.0 vs 10.8 months respectively; p = 0.012). A similar trend in mPFS was observed in ADJ T versus non ADJ T pts (8.6 vs 6.9 months; p = 0.06). Pts with longer DFS after ADJ T showed major benefit in mOS (16.3 vs 13.1 vs 8.7 months in ≥ 12 vs 6-12 vs ≤ 6 months DFS respectively; p < 0.001). No significant differences in mPFS were observed in the three subgroups (p = 0.271). Conclusions: Nab-P + G is a standard of care also in pts treated with ADJ T. ADJ treatment is an independent prognostic factor related to better survival, maybe reflecting the effect of prior radical surgery. Pts who received G-based ADJ T may benefit of Nab-P+G combination with an increased survival in pts with longer DFS.

HER2 loss in HER2-positive gastric or gastroesophageal cancer after trastuzumab therapy: Implication for further clinical research

Mechanisms of acquired resistance to trastuzumab-based treatment in gastric cancer are largely unknown. In this study, we analyzed 22 pairs of tumor samples taken at baseline and post-progression in patients receiving chemotherapy and trastuzumab for advanced HER2-positive [immunohistochemistry (IHC) 3+ or 2+ with in-situ hybridization (ISH) amplification] gastric or gastroesophageal cancers. Strict clinical criteria for defining acquired trastuzumab resistance were adopted. Loss of HER2 positivity and loss of HER2 over-expression were defined as post-trastuzumab IHC score <3+ and absence of ISH amplification, and IHC "downscoring" from 2+/3+ to 0/1+, respectively. HER2 IHC was always performed, while ISH was missing in 3 post-progression samples. Patients with initial HER2 IHC score 3+ and 2+ were 14 (64%) and 8 (36%), respectively. Loss of HER2 positivity and HER2 over-expression was observed in 32 and 32% samples, respectively. The chance of HER2 loss was not associated with any of the baseline clinicopathological variables. The only exception was in patients with initial IHC score 2+ versus 3+, for both endpoints of HER2 positivity (80 vs. 14%; p = 0.008) and HER2 over-expression (63 vs. 14%; p = 0.025). As already shown in breast cancer, loss of HER2 may be observed also in gastric cancers patients treated with trastuzumab-based chemotherapy in the clinical practice. This phenomenon may be one of the biological reasons explaining the failure of anti-HER2 second-line strategies in initially HER2-positive disease.

Single-Agent Panitumumab in Frail Elderly Patients With Advanced RAS and BRAF Wild-Type Colorectal Cancer: Challenging Drug Label to Light Up New Hope

BACKGROUND

No prospective trials have specifically addressed the efficacy and safety of panitumumab in elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). We aimed at assessing the efficacy and safety of single agent panitumumab in "frail" elderly patients diagnosed with metastatic RAS and BRAF wild-type CRC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty elderly patients (aged ≥ 75 years) with metastatic RAS-BRAF wild-type CRC received off-label prescriptions of single-agent panitumumab at seven Italian institutions. Treatment was administered as first line in patients with absolute contraindication to any chemotherapy or as second-line treatment after failure of a fluoropyrimidine-based treatment, in the presence of contraindication to irinotecan. The outcome measures included objective response rate (ORR), as well as progression-free survival (PFS), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), and safety.

RESULTS

The median PFS and OS were 6.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.9-8 months) and 14.3 months (95% CI: 10.9-17.7 months), respectively. ORR was 32.5%, and DCR was 72.5%. Dose reductions related to adverse events (AEs) were reported in 9 (23%) patients, but no permanent treatment discontinuation caused by was reported. The most frequent grade 3 AE was skin rash, with an incidence of 20%.

CONCLUSION

Panitumumab is effective and well-tolerated in frail elderly patients with RAS-BRAF wild-type metastatic CRC and deemed unfit for chemotherapy. A randomized study is needed to confirm these data.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Treatment of elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer represents a difficult challenge in clinical practice. A significant proportion of frail elderly patients do not receive treatment, reflecting ongoing uncertainty of clinical benefit and toxicity of chemotherapy. Unfit condition in this cohort of patients further limits antineoplastic prescription and consequently patient survival. RAS and BRAF wild-type status could help select an elderly and unfit population that could benefit from anti-epidermal growth factor receptor single agent therapy. In the present study, single-agent off-label panitumumab was effective and well-tolerated as first-line treatment in frail elderly patients deemed unfit for chemotherapy for metastatic RAS and BRAF wild-type colorectal cancer.

Bevacizumab plus XELOX as first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: The OBELIX study

AIM: To confirm the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab/XELOX combination for the treatment of locally advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) in Italy.

METHODS: This multicentric, prospective, open-label study included patients with CRC previously untreated with chemotherapy. Patients were administered bevacizumab in combination with XELOX. The primary efficacy end-point was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end-points included time to overall response (TOR), duration of response (DOR), time to treatment failure (TTF) and overall survival (OS). The incidence and type of adverse events AEs and severe AEs were evaluated. Also, the mutational status of BRAF and KRAS was assessed by high resolution melting and direct sequencing, and quality of life (QoL) was measured by the EuroQoL EQ-5D questionnaire at baseline and at the last visit.

RESULTS: The intention-to-treat population included 197 patients (mean age: 62.3 ± 9.9 years, 56.4% males). At baseline, 16/34 evaluable subjects (47.1%) harbored a KRAS and/or a BRAF mutation; the mean QoL index was 80.2 ± 14.3. First-line therapy was given for 223.7 ± 175.9 d, and after a mean follow-up of 387.7 ± 238.8 d all patients discontinued from the study mainly for disease progression (PD, 45.4%) and AEs (25.4%). Median PFS was 9.7 mo (95%CI: 8.4-10.5) and the median values for secondary end-points were: TOR = 3.9 mo (95%CI: 2.6-4.7), DOR = 8.5 mo (95%CI: 7.3-10.3), TTF = 6.7 mo (95%CI: 6.0-7.7) and OS = 23.2 mo (95%CI: 20.1-27.2). Patients carrying at least one lesion had a lower overall response rate (66.7% vs 88.9%) and a lower probability of achieving complete or partial response than those without mutations, but the difference in relative risk was not statistically significant (P = 0.2). Mean EQ-5D-3L raw index score significantly decreased to 74.9 ± 19.1 at the last visit (signed-rank test, P = 0.0076), but in general the evaluation on QoL perceived by patients was good.

CONCLUSION: The efficacy of bevacizumab in combination with XELOX in terms of PFS in patients with aCRC or mCRC in Italy was confirmed, with acceptable toxicity.

Nab-paclitaxel (Nab-P) and gemcitabine (G) as first-line chemotherapy (CT) in advanced pancreatic cancer (APDAC) elderly patients (pts): A “real-life” study

424

Background: Nab-P and G represents a standard of care in first line APDAC treatment. Neverthless, activity, efficacy and safety of Nab-P + G have not been established in elderly pts and clinical trials on APDAC treatment contain fewer elderly pts compared with everyday clinical practice. Aim of this analysis is to evaluate outcomes and toxicities of elderly pts treated with first line Nab-P + G in a “real world” population. Methods: Clinical records of APDAC pts receiving Nab-P 125 mg/m2 and G 1000 mg/m2on days 1,8 and 15 of a 28 day cycle as first line CT were retrospectively reviewed, investigating activity (Disease Control Rate, DCR: Stable Disease + Partial Response + Complete Response, SD+PR+CR), efficacy (Progression Free Survival, PFS and Overall Survival, OS) and safety. Analysis was then performed in ≥ 70 years group of pts. OS and PFS were estimated with Kaplan-Meyer method with 95% CI. Cox-regression model was applied to the data with univariate and multivariate approach. Results: 105 pts (M/F:58/47), median age 64 (range 37-77) ECOG Performance Status of 0/1/2: 46/41/17 respectively were included in our analysis. 37 pts (35%) were ≥ 70 years old. In overall population Nab-P+G was administered for a median number of 6 cycles (range 1-12). 4 CR, 24 PR and 28 SD were observed (DCR: 53%), median PFS was 7 months (95% C.I. 5.93 - 8.08) and median OS was 11 months (95% C.I. 9.58 – 12.41). Pts aged ≥ 70 received a median number of 5 cycles (range 1 - 10). DCR was 48% (9 PR + 9 SD) with no differences in PFS (6.5 months, 95%C.I. 5.36 – 7.64, p=0.49) and OS (10 months, 95% C.I. 8.53 – 11.47 p=0.67) with < 70 years old pts. Treatment was mildly tolerated and toxicity profile appeared to be different in elderly pts than younger ones with more G3-4 non-haematological (27% vs 15% p=0.03) and fewer haematological (12% vs 29% p=0.004) events respectively. Conclusions: These data, evaluated under daily practice conditions, in absence of clinical trials on APDAC elderly pts, show that pts aged ≥ 70 may benefit of first-line Nab-P and G combination, as well as younger ones, both in terms of response and survival experiencing a tolerable, but significantly different toxicity profile.

Analysis of prognostic factors in advanced pancreatic cancer (APDAC) patients (pts) undergoing to first-line nab-paclitaxel (Nab-P) and gemcitabine (G) treatment

412

Background: Nab-P + G combination represents an optimal first line therapeutic option in APDAC. Actually we have no parameters to predict prognosis in pts receiving this regimen. Here we present data of a multicentre retrospective analysis evaluating prognostic impact of clinical or biological factors in a cohort of APDAC pts treated with Nab-P + G first line CT. Methods: Clinical records of 118 APDAC pts receiving first line Nab-P + G were retrospectively reviewed. Overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) were evaluated with Kaplan Meier method with 95% CI and curves were compared with log-rank test. Cox-regression model was applied to the data with univariate and multivariate approach. Variables included in analysis were age, gender, ECOG PS, primary tumor site, liver metastases, multiple metastatic sites, baseline CA19-9, bilirubin levels, neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR), CA19-9 decrease > 50%, biliary stent and symptomatic disease. Results: Median age was 66 (37 - 83), M/F:65/53, ECOG PS 0/1/2: 51/46/21 respectively. 4 complete and 27 partial responses were observed with 26% response rate (RR). Median OS and PFS were 11 months (95% CI 9.58 – 12.41) and 7 months ( 95% CI 5.96 – 8.03) respectively. When considered at univariate analysis primary tumor location to the head, ECOG PS of 2, bilirubin levels higher than median and NLR ≥ 5 had a bad prognostic impact both on PFS and OS. Differently, CA19-9 decrease > 50% was considered a positive prognostic factor for PFS and OS. Multivariate analysis confirmed the negative role of NLR ≥ 5 respect of PFS (HR 3.21; 95%CI 1.61 – 5.68, p = 0.002) and OS (HR 3.38; 95%CI 1.88 – 5.79, p = 0.001) and positive impact of CA19-9 decrease > 50% on PFS (HR 0.37; 95% CI 0.11 – 0.68, p=0.006) and OS (HR 0.53; 95% CI 0.15 – 0.97, p=0.005), as independent prognostic factors. Conclusions: This analysis suggest that in APDAC pts receiving first line Nab-P + G, high NLR value (≥5) could be considered an easy detectable, independent parameter to predict poor outcomes in terms of PFS and OS. Furthermore CA19-9 reduction > 50% from baseline may be, in absence of other clinical and molecular parameters, an early marker of good prognosis.

VEGF-A clinical significance in gastric cancers: immunohistochemical analysis of a wide Italian cohort

PURPOSE

The clinical significance of VEGF-A expression in gastric cancer (GC) has been reported with contradicting results. We analyzed the expression and clinical significance of VEGF-A in a wide Italian cohort of GC specimens.

METHODS

VEGF-A expression was tested by immunohistochemistry in 507 patients with GC of all clinical stages. The impact of VEGF-A on overall survival (OS) was evaluated in conjunction with clinical and pathological parameters.

RESULTS

In the Italian cohort we studied VEGF-A was not an independent prognostic factor neither at the univariate nor at multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Although frequently expressed, in our study VEGF-A was not able to discriminate between groups of patients with different risk.

hERG1 channels regulate VEGF-A secretion in human gastric cancer: clinicopathological correlations and therapeutical implications

PURPOSE

hERG1 channels are aberrantly expressed in several types of human cancers, where they affect different aspects of cancer cell behavior. A thorough analysis of the functional role and clinical significance of hERG1 channels in gastric cancer is still lacking.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

hERG1 expression was tested in a wide (508 samples) Italian cohort of surgically resected patients with gastric cancer, by immunohistochemistry and real-time quantitative PCR. The functional link between hERG1 and the VEGF-A was studied in different gastric cancer cell lines. The effects of hERG1 and VEGF-A inhibition were evaluated in vivo in xenograft mouse models.

RESULTS

hERG1 was positive in 69% of the patients and positivity correlated with Lauren's intestinal type, fundus localization of the tumor, G1-G2 grading, I and II tumor-node-metastasis stage, and VEGF-A expression. hERG1 activity modulated VEGF-A secretion, through an AKT-dependent regulation of the transcriptional activity of the hypoxia inducible factor. Treatment of immunodeficient mice xenografted with human gastric cancer cells, with a combination of hERG1 blockers and anti-VEGF-A antibodies, impaired tumor growth more than single-drug treatments.

CONCLUSION

Our results show that hERG1 (i) is aberrantly expressed in human gastric cancer since its early stages; (ii) drives an intracellular pathway leading to VEGF-A secretion; (iii) can be exploited to identify a gastric cancer patients' group where a combined treatment with antiangiogenic drugs and noncardiotoxic hERG1 inhibitors could be proposed.