1
|
Dekervel J, Petrillo A. Gastrointestinal issue: Advances in gastrointestinal oncology. Curr Opin Pharmacol 2024; 75:102437. [PMID: 38401318 DOI: 10.1016/j.coph.2024.102437] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/26/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Jeroen Dekervel
- Associate Professor and Gastrointestinal Oncologist, Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Angelica Petrillo
- Medical Oncologist Consultant, UOC Oncologia, Ospedale del Mare, Viale delle Metamorfosi, Naples, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Petrillo A, Derks S, Smyth EC. Controversies in upper GI oncology: MSI-H in gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma. ESMO Open 2024; 9:102229. [PMID: 38244348 PMCID: PMC10835121 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2023.102229] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- A Petrillo
- Medical Oncology Unit, Ospedale del Mare, Naples, Italy.
| | - S Derks
- Amsterdam UMC location Free University, Medical Oncology, Amsterdam; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam; Oncode Institute, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - E C Smyth
- Oxford NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Churchill Hospital, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ciardiello D, Petrillo A. Editorial: Optimizing the first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer. Front Oncol 2024; 14:1366383. [PMID: 38327740 PMCID: PMC10847841 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1366383] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2024] [Accepted: 01/10/2024] [Indexed: 02/09/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Davide Ciardiello
- Division of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology and Neuroendocrine Tumors, European Institute of Oncology, IEO, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Petrillo A, Maron SB, Sundar R. Controversies in upper GI oncology: first-line checkpoint inhibitor use in metastatic GEA: guided by PD-L1 CPS or not? ESMO Open 2023; 8:101211. [PMID: 37054477 PMCID: PMC10123152 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2023.101211] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/15/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- A Petrillo
- Medical Oncology Unit, Ospedale del mare, Naples, Italy.
| | - S B Maron
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - R Sundar
- Department of Haematology-Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, Singapore; Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
van de Haar J, Ma X, Ooft SN, van der Helm PW, Hoes LR, Mainardi S, Pinato DJ, Sun K, Salvatore L, Tortora G, Zurlo IV, Leo S, Giampieri R, Berardi R, Gelsomino F, Merz V, Mazzuca F, Antonuzzo L, Rosati G, Stavraka C, Ross P, Rodriquenz MG, Pavarana M, Messina C, Iveson T, Zoratto F, Thomas A, Fenocchio E, Ratti M, Depetris I, Cergnul M, Morelli C, Libertini M, Parisi A, De Tursi M, Zanaletti N, Garrone O, Graham J, Longarini R, Gobba SM, Petrillo A, Tamburini E, La Verde N, Petrelli F, Ricci V, Wessels LFA, Ghidini M, Cortellini A, Voest EE, Valeri N. Codon-specific KRAS mutations predict survival benefit of trifluridine/tipiracil in metastatic colorectal cancer. Nat Med 2023; 29:605-614. [PMID: 36864254 PMCID: PMC10033412 DOI: 10.1038/s41591-023-02240-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2022] [Accepted: 01/26/2023] [Indexed: 03/04/2023]
Abstract
Genomics has greatly improved how patients with cancer are being treated; however, clinical-grade genomic biomarkers for chemotherapies are currently lacking. Using whole-genome analysis of 37 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treated with the chemotherapy trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI), we identified KRAS codon G12 (KRASG12) mutations as a potential biomarker of resistance. Next, we collected real-world data of 960 patients with mCRC receiving FTD/TPI and validated that KRASG12 mutations were significantly associated with poor survival, also in analyses restricted to the RAS/RAF mutant subgroup. We next analyzed the data of the global, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 RECOURSE trial (n = 800 patients) and found that KRASG12 mutations (n = 279) were predictive biomarkers for reduced overall survival (OS) benefit of FTD/TPI versus placebo (unadjusted interaction P = 0.0031, adjusted interaction P = 0.015). For patients with KRASG12 mutations in the RECOURSE trial, OS was not prolonged with FTD/TPI versus placebo (n = 279; hazard ratio (HR) = 0.97; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.73-1.20; P = 0.85). In contrast, patients with KRASG13 mutant tumors showed significantly improved OS with FTD/TPI versus placebo (n = 60; HR = 0.29; 95% CI = 0.15-0.55; P < 0.001). In isogenic cell lines and patient-derived organoids, KRASG12 mutations were associated with increased resistance to FTD-based genotoxicity. In conclusion, these data show that KRASG12 mutations are biomarkers for reduced OS benefit of FTD/TPI treatment, with potential implications for approximately 28% of patients with mCRC under consideration for treatment with FTD/TPI. Furthermore, our data suggest that genomics-based precision medicine may be possible for a subset of chemotherapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joris van de Haar
- Division of Molecular Oncology & Immunology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Division of Molecular Carcinogenesis, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Oncode Institute, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Xuhui Ma
- Division of Molecular Oncology & Immunology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Oncode Institute, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Salo N Ooft
- Division of Molecular Oncology & Immunology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Oncode Institute, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Pim W van der Helm
- Division of Molecular Oncology & Immunology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Oncode Institute, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Louisa R Hoes
- Division of Molecular Oncology & Immunology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Oncode Institute, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Sara Mainardi
- Division of Molecular Carcinogenesis, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Oncode Institute, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - David J Pinato
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK
- Division of Oncology, Department of Translational Medicine, University of Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy
- Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Kristi Sun
- Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Lisa Salvatore
- Oncologia Medica, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Roma, Italy
- Oncologia Medica, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy
| | - Giampaolo Tortora
- Oncologia Medica, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Roma, Italy
- Oncologia Medica, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy
| | | | - Silvana Leo
- Medical Oncology, 'Vito Fazzi' Hospital, Lecce, Italy
| | - Riccardo Giampieri
- Department of Oncology, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Azienda Ospedialiera Universitaria delle Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Rossana Berardi
- Department of Oncology, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Azienda Ospedialiera Universitaria delle Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | | | - Valeria Merz
- Medical Oncology Unit, Santa Chiara Hospital, Trento, Italy
| | - Federica Mazzuca
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University, Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedialiera Universitaria Sant'Andrea, Rome, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Antonuzzo
- Clinical Oncology Unit, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Gerardo Rosati
- Medical Oncology Unit, S. Carlo Hospital, Potenza, Italy
| | - Chara Stavraka
- School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, Guy's Hospital, London, UK
- Department of Medical Oncology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Paul Ross
- Department of Medical Oncology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Maria Grazia Rodriquenz
- Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza, San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy
| | - Michele Pavarana
- Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Carlo Messina
- Oncology Unit, ARNAS Civico Di Cristina Benfratelli Hospital, Palermo, Italy
| | | | - Federica Zoratto
- Unità Operativa Complessa Oncologia, Ospedale Santa Maria Goretti Latina, Latina, Italy
| | - Anne Thomas
- Leicester Cancer Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester, UK
| | - Elisabetta Fenocchio
- Candiolo Cancer Institute FPO Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico Candiolo, Candiolo, Italy
| | | | - Ilaria Depetris
- Division of Medical Oncology, ASL TO4, Ospedale Civile di Ivrea, Ivrea, Italy
| | - Massimiliano Cergnul
- Unità Operativa Oncologia Medica, Ospedale Civile di Legnano, Azienda Socio-Sanitaria Territoriale Ovest Milanese, Legnano, Italy
| | - Cristina Morelli
- Medical Oncology Unit, Department of Systems Medicine, Tor Vergata University Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Alessandro Parisi
- Department of Oncology, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Azienda Ospedialiera Universitaria delle Marche, Ancona, Italy
- Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Michele De Tursi
- Dipartimento di Tecnologie Innovative in Medicina & Odontoiatria, Università G. D'Annunzio, Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy
| | - Nicoletta Zanaletti
- Experimental Clinical Abdominal Oncology Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - Ornella Garrone
- Oncology Unit, Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Janet Graham
- Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, UK
| | | | - Stefania Maria Gobba
- Division of Clinical Oncology, Azienda Socio-Sanitaria Territoriale dei Sette Laghi Varese, Varese, Italy
| | | | | | - Nicla La Verde
- Luigi Sacco Hospital-Polo Universitario, Azienda Socio-Sanitaria Territoriale Fatebenefratelli Sacco, Milan, Italy
| | - Fausto Petrelli
- Oncology Unit, Azienda Socio-Sanitaria Territoriale Bergamo Ovest, Treviglio, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Ricci
- Medical Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera di Rilievo Nazionale 'San Pio', Benevento, Italy
| | - Lodewyk F A Wessels
- Division of Molecular Carcinogenesis, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Oncode Institute, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science, Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands
| | - Michele Ghidini
- Oncology Unit, Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Alessio Cortellini
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK
- Medical Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy
| | - Emile E Voest
- Division of Molecular Oncology & Immunology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
- Oncode Institute, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Nicola Valeri
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK.
- Centre for Evolution and Cancer, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Carotenuto P, Salati M, Barbato A, Piscopo F, Evangelista L, Gambardella G, Sarnataro S, Petrillo A, Daniele B, Pisapia P, Iaccarino A, Salatiello M, Spallanzani A, Gelsomino F, Malapelle U, Iuliano A, Troncone G, Reggiani Bonetti L, Dominici M, Franco B. Integrated analysis of genomic and transcriptomic profiles to examine CD73/NT5E as a driver of drug-resistance and immunosuppression in biliary cancer (BTC). J Clin Oncol 2023. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2023.41.4_suppl.606] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
606 Background: Despite the improved outcome achieved by the addition of the anti-PD-L1 durvalumab to standard chemotherapy, the vast majority of BTC do not benefit from chemo-immunotherapy. Immunosuppressive microenvironment is a dominant feature of BTC, involved in tumour progression and drug resistance. Here, we investigated the biological role and treatment implications of the adenosine-producing enzyme CD73 in a clinically-annotated cohort of BTC. CD73, an ecto-5’-nucleotidase (NT5E), creates an immunosuppressive tumour-promoting microenvironment by converting ATP to adenosine. Methods: Immunohistochemistry for CD73, CD4/CD8 and FOXP3 as well as whole-exome and transcriptomic sequencing were performed on resected specimens of 80 BTC (Illumina Platform). Spatial Transcriptomics was performed by using Visium Spatial Gene Expression-10x Genomics). Silencing of CD73 was obtained by transient transfection od CD73-siRNA, while genetic Knock-out by using CRISPR-Cas system technology in two BTC cell lines. Tumor growth was assessed in 2D and in 3D cell culture by using MTS assay and spheroid growth analysis before and after treatment with selected drugs. Statistical and Survival, correlation analyses were performed. Results: High CD73 expression (CD73high) was associated with older age (>70 years, p=0.01), gallbladder subsite (p=0.03), and nodal involvement (p=0.04). CD73high tumours were significantly enriched in infiltrating FOXP3+ T lymphocytes (p<0.001). CD73high status was independent predictor of poorer prognosis at the multivariate analysis (p=0,03) together with ECOG PS ≥2 (p=0,001) and the pathological stage (p=0,025) and was associated with a remarkably shorter RFS in patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy (p=0,011). At the transcriptomic level, CD73high tumours were significantly enriched in upregulated EMT, TNF-alfa/NFKB, hypoxia and G2/M checkpoint signaling pathways and p53, BMI1, MEL18, EGFR and K-RAS genes. In in vitro models, siRNA-mediated depletion and CRISPR-CAS9 gene KO of CD73 sensitized both BTC 2D and 3D culture to cisplatin/gemcitabine treatment. The pharmacological inhibition of CD73 by AMCP improved the sensitivity of BTC cell lines to cisplatin/gemcitabine treatment. Finally, Spatially resolved transcriptomics of CD73high revealed a critical role of CD73 in tumor immunity and therapeutic response. Conclusions: We showed that CD73high BTC display aggressive biological features, poorer prognosis and resistance to standard chemotherapy. The therapeutic targeting of this adenosinergic ectonucleotidase by clinically-available compounds has the potential to enhance the efficacy of conventional treatment in BTC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pietro Carotenuto
- Department of Translational Medical Science, University of Naples, Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Massimiliano Salati
- Division of Oncology, Department of Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital of Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Anna Barbato
- Genomic Medicine, TIGEM-Telethon Institute of Genetics and Medicine, Pozzuoli, Italy
| | - Fabiola Piscopo
- TIGEM, Telethon Institute of Genetics and Medicine, Naples, Italy
| | | | - Gennaro Gambardella
- Genomic Medicine, TIGEM-Telethon Institute of Genetics and Medicine, Pozzuoli, Italy
| | - Sergio Sarnataro
- TIGEM, Telethon Institute of Genetics and Medicine, Naples, Italy
| | | | - Bruno Daniele
- Medical Oncology Unit, Ospedale del Mare, Naples, Italy
| | - Pasquale Pisapia
- Department of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Antonino Iaccarino
- Department of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Maria Salatiello
- Department of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | | | - Fabio Gelsomino
- Department of Oncology and Haematology, Division of Oncology, University Hospital of Modena, Modena, Italy, Modena, Italy
| | - Umberto Malapelle
- Department of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Antonella Iuliano
- Department of Mathematics, Informatics and Economy (DIMIE), University of Basilicata, Potenza, Italy
| | - Giancarlo Troncone
- Department of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | | | - Massimo Dominici
- Department of Oncology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Italy, Modena, Italy
| | - Brunella Franco
- TIGEM, Telethon Institute of Genetics and Medicine, Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Cardone C, De Stefano A, Rosati G, Cassata A, Silvestro L, Borrelli M, Di Gennaro E, Romano C, Nappi A, Zanaletti N, Foschini F, Casaretti R, Tatangelo F, Lastoria S, Raddi M, Bilancia D, Granata V, Setola S, Petrillo A, Vitagliano C, Gargiulo P, Arenare L, Febbraro A, Martinelli E, Ciardiello F, Delrio P, Budillon A, Piccirillo MC, Avallone A. Regorafenib monotherapy as second-line treatment of patients with RAS-mutant advanced colorectal cancer (STREAM): an academic, multicenter, single-arm, two-stage, phase II study. ESMO Open 2023; 8:100748. [PMID: 36603521 PMCID: PMC10024144 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100748] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2022] [Revised: 11/18/2022] [Accepted: 11/23/2022] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Maintaining angiogenesis inhibition and switching the chemotherapy backbone represent the current second-line therapy in patients with RAS-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Regorafenib, an oral multikinase inhibitor, prolonged overall survival (OS) in the chemorefractory setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS STREAM was an academic, multicenter, single-arm phase II trial, evaluating the activity of regorafenib in RAS-mutant mCRC, in terms of the rate of patients who were progression-free after 6 months from study entry (6mo-PF). Patients were pretreated with fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin, and bevacizumab. According to Simon's two-stage design, ≥18 patients 6mo-PF were needed in the overall population (N = 46). Secondary endpoints were safety, objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and OS. Early metabolic response by [18F]2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography ([18F]-FDG PET/CT) scan was an exploratory endpoint. EudraCT Number: 2015-001105-13. RESULTS The number of patients 6mo-PF was 8/22 at the first stage and 14/46 in the overall population. The ORR was 10.9%, disease control rate was 54.6%, median (m)PFS was 3.6 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.9-6.7 months], mOS was 18.9 months (95% CI 10.3-35.3 months), and mPFS2 (from study entry to subsequent-line progression) was 13.3 months (95% CI 8.4-19.7 months). Long benefiter patients (>6mo-PF) significantly more often had a single metastatic site and lung-limited disease. No unexpected toxicity was reported. Grade ≥3 events occurred in 39.1% of patients, with hand-foot syndrome (13%), fatigue, and hyperbilirubinemia (6.5%) occurring mostly. Baseline metabolic assessment was associated with OS in the multivariate analysis, while early metabolic response was not associated with clinical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS The study did not meet its primary endpoint. However, regorafenib was well tolerated and did not preclude subsequent treatments. Patients with good prognostic features (single metastatic site and lung-limited disease) reported clinical benefit with regorafenib. The exploratory metabolic analysis suggests that baseline [18F]-FDG PET/CT might be useful to select patients with a favorable outcome. A chemotherapy-free interval with regorafenib was associated with durable disease control in a selected group of patients with favorable clinical characteristics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Cardone
- Experimental Clinical Abdominal Oncology Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy. https://twitter.com/clacardone
| | - A De Stefano
- Experimental Clinical Abdominal Oncology Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy. https://twitter.com/alfdestefano
| | - G Rosati
- Medical Oncology Unit, S. Carlo Hospital, Potenza, Italy
| | - A Cassata
- Experimental Clinical Abdominal Oncology Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - L Silvestro
- Experimental Clinical Abdominal Oncology Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - M Borrelli
- Experimental Clinical Abdominal Oncology Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - E Di Gennaro
- Experimental Pharmacology Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - C Romano
- Experimental Clinical Abdominal Oncology Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - A Nappi
- Experimental Clinical Abdominal Oncology Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - N Zanaletti
- Experimental Clinical Abdominal Oncology Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - F Foschini
- Experimental Clinical Abdominal Oncology Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - R Casaretti
- Experimental Clinical Abdominal Oncology Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - F Tatangelo
- Pathology Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - S Lastoria
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - M Raddi
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - D Bilancia
- Medical Oncology Unit, S. Carlo Hospital, Potenza, Italy
| | - V Granata
- Radiology Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - S Setola
- Radiology Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - A Petrillo
- Radiology Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - C Vitagliano
- Experimental Pharmacology Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - P Gargiulo
- Clinical Trial Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - L Arenare
- Clinical Trial Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - A Febbraro
- Hospital Sacro Cuore di Gesu, Fatebenefratelli, Benevento, Italy
| | - E Martinelli
- Medical Oncology, Precision Medicine Department, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy. https://twitter.com/grikamartinelli
| | - F Ciardiello
- Medical Oncology, Precision Medicine Department, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy
| | - P Delrio
- Colorectal Oncological Surgery, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - A Budillon
- Experimental Pharmacology Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy. https://twitter.com/AlfredoBudillon
| | - M C Piccirillo
- Clinical Trial Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - A Avallone
- Experimental Clinical Abdominal Oncology Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Giunta EF, Arrichiello G, Pappalardo A, Federico P, Petrillo A. Transversal Perspectives of Integrative Oncology Care in Gastric and Lobular Breast Cancer. Cancer Treat Res 2023; 188:89-104. [PMID: 38175343 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-33602-7_4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2024]
Abstract
The occurrence of gastric cancer has been associated with an increased risk of lobular breast tumors in a subset of patients harboring selected germline mutations. Among all, the germline alteration of the gene coding for E-Cadherin (CDH1) was associated with an increased risk of gastric cancer diffuse-histotype and lobular breast cancer. However, the risk assessment of breast neoplasms and the role of multiple prophylactic procedures in these patients has never been systematically addressed. In addition, the performance of the common screening procedures for lobular breast cancer like mammography is suboptimal. Therefore, recalling the need for a better articulation of the patient-centered strategies of surveillance for individuals with germline CDH1 and other similar alterations, to offer comprehensive approaches for prevention, early diagnosis, and treatment. Accordingly, this chapter aims to discuss the value and the role of integrated oncological care in the era of oncology sub-specializations. Additionally, it sheds light on how the harmonization across the health providers can enhance patient care in this setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emilio Francesco Giunta
- Department of Precision Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Study of Campania, 80131, Naples, Italy
| | - Gianluca Arrichiello
- Department of Precision Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Study of Campania, 80131, Naples, Italy
| | | | - Piera Federico
- Medical Oncology Unit, Ospedale del Mare, Via E. Russo, 80147, Naples, Italy
| | - Angelica Petrillo
- Medical Oncology Unit, Ospedale del Mare, Via E. Russo, 80147, Naples, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Petrillo A, Smyth EC, van Laarhoven HWM. Emerging targets in gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma: what the future looks like. Ther Adv Med Oncol 2023; 15:17588359231173177. [PMID: 37197225 PMCID: PMC10184253 DOI: 10.1177/17588359231173177] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2023] [Accepted: 04/14/2023] [Indexed: 05/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (GEA) is a heterogeneous disease with a poor prognosis. Chemotherapy has been the cornerstone in treating metastatic diseases. Recently, the introduction of immunotherapy demonstrated improved survival outcomes in localized and metastatic diseases. Beyond immunotherapy, several attempts were made to improve patient survival by understanding the molecular mechanisms of GEA and several molecular classifications were published. In this narrative review, we will discuss emerging targets in GEA, including fibroblast growth factor receptor and Claudin 18.2, as well as the accompanying drugs. In addition, novel agents directed against well-known targets, such as HER2 and angiogenesis, will be discussed, as well as cellular therapies like CAR-T and SPEAR-T cells.
Collapse
|
10
|
Kocher F, Puccini A, Untergasser G, Martowicz A, Zimmer K, Pircher A, Baca Y, Xiu J, Haybaeck J, Tymoszuk P, Goldberg RM, Petrillo A, Shields AF, Salem ME, Marshall JL, Hall M, Korn WM, Nabhan C, Battaglin F, Lenz HJ, Lou E, Choo SP, Toh CK, Gasteiger S, Pichler R, Wolf D, Seeber A. Multi-omic Characterization of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Relates CXCR4 mRNA Expression Levels to Potential Clinical Targets. Clin Cancer Res 2022; 28:4957-4967. [PMID: 36112544 PMCID: PMC9660543 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-22-0275] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2022] [Revised: 07/13/2022] [Accepted: 09/13/2022] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Chemokines are essential for immune cell trafficking and are considered to have a major impact on the composition of the tumor microenvironment. CX-chemokine receptor 4 (CXCR4) is associated with poor differentiation, metastasis, and prognosis in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). This study provides a comprehensive molecular portrait of PDAC according to CXCR4 mRNA expression levels. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN The Cancer Genome Atlas database was used to explore molecular and immunologic features associated with CXCR4 mRNA expression in PDAC. A large real-word dataset (n = 3,647) served for validation and further exploratory analyses. Single-cell RNA analyses on a publicly available dataset and in-house multiplex immunofluorescence (mIF) experiments were performed to elaborate cellular localization of CXCR4. RESULTS High CXCR4 mRNA expression (CXCR4high) was associated with increased infiltration of regulatory T cells, CD8+ T cells, and macrophages, and upregulation of several immune-related genes, including immune checkpoint transcripts (e.g., TIGIT, CD274, PDCD1). Analysis of the validation cohort confirmed the CXCR4-dependent immunologic TME composition in PDAC irrespective of microsatellite instability-high/mismatch repair-deficient or tumor mutational burden. Single-cell RNA analysis and mIF revealed that CXCR4 was mainly expressed by macrophages and T-cell subsets. Clinical relevance of our finding is supported by an improved survival of CXCR4high PDAC. CONCLUSIONS High intratumoral CXCR4 mRNA expression is linked to a T cell- and macrophage-rich PDAC phenotype with high expression of inhibitory immune checkpoints. Thus, our findings might serve as a rationale to investigate CXCR4 as a predictive biomarker in patients with PDAC undergoing immune checkpoint inhibition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Florian Kocher
- Department of Internal Medicine V (Hematology and Oncology), Comprehensive Cancer Center Innsbruck (CCCI), Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Alberto Puccini
- Medical Oncology Unit 1, Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Gerold Untergasser
- Department of Internal Medicine V (Hematology and Oncology), Comprehensive Cancer Center Innsbruck (CCCI), Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Agnieszka Martowicz
- Department of Internal Medicine V (Hematology and Oncology), Comprehensive Cancer Center Innsbruck (CCCI), Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Kai Zimmer
- Department of Internal Medicine V (Hematology and Oncology), Comprehensive Cancer Center Innsbruck (CCCI), Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Andreas Pircher
- Department of Internal Medicine V (Hematology and Oncology), Comprehensive Cancer Center Innsbruck (CCCI), Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | | | | | - Johannes Haybaeck
- Institute of Pathology, Neuropathology and Molecular Pathology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.,Diagnostic and Research Center for Molecular Biomedicine, Institute of Pathology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Piotr Tymoszuk
- Data Analytics As a Service Tirol (DAAS) Tirol, Innsbruck, Austria
| | | | | | - Anthony F. Shields
- Department of Oncology, Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan
| | - Mohamed E. Salem
- Levine Cancer Institute, Carolinas HealthCare System, Charlotte, North Carolina
| | - John L. Marshall
- Ruesch Center for The Cure of Gastrointestinal Cancers, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC
| | - Michael Hall
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple University Health System, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | | | | | - Francesca Battaglin
- Division of Medical Oncology, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Heinz-Josef Lenz
- Division of Medical Oncology, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Emil Lou
- Division of Hematology, Oncology, and Transplantation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Su-Pin Choo
- Curie Oncology, Mount Elizabeth Novena Specialist Centre, Singapore
| | - Chee-Keong Toh
- Curie Oncology, Mount Elizabeth Novena Specialist Centre, Singapore
| | - Silvia Gasteiger
- Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Renate Pichler
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Dominik Wolf
- Department of Internal Medicine V (Hematology and Oncology), Comprehensive Cancer Center Innsbruck (CCCI), Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Andreas Seeber
- Department of Internal Medicine V (Hematology and Oncology), Comprehensive Cancer Center Innsbruck (CCCI), Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.,Corresponding Author: Andreas Seeber, Department of Hematology and Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Innsbruck, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, Innsbruck 6020, Austria. Phone: 0043-50504-83166; E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Petrillo A, Lorenzen S, van Laarhoven H. Controversies in upper gastrointestinal oncology: neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy in oesophageal adenocarcinoma. ESMO Open 2022; 7:100613. [PMID: 36356415 PMCID: PMC9646664 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100613] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2022] [Accepted: 09/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- A. Petrillo
- Medical Oncology Unit, Ospedale del mare, Naples, Italy,Correspondence to: Dr A. Petrillo, Medical Oncology Unit, Ospedale del mare, via E. Russo, Naples, Italy
| | - S. Lorenzen
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Technical University, Munich, Germany
| | - H.W.M. van Laarhoven
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam,University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Parisi A, Giampieri R, Mammarella A, Felicetti C, Salvatore L, Bensi M, Maratta MG, Strippoli A, Filippi R, Satolli MA, Petrillo A, Daniele B, De Tursi M, Di Marino P, Giordano G, Landriscina M, Vitale P, Zurlo IV, Dell’Aquila E, Tomao S, Depetris I, Di Pietro FR, Zoratto F, Ciardiello D, Pensieri MV, Garrone O, Galassi B, Ferri C, Berardi R, Ghidini M. Primary versus secondary antiemetic prophylaxis with NK1 receptor antagonists in patients affected by gastrointestinal malignancies and treated with a doublet or triplet combination regimen including oxaliplatin and/or irinotecan plus fluoropyrimidines: A propensity score matched analysis. Front Oncol 2022; 12:935826. [PMID: 36033477 PMCID: PMC9413268 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.935826] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2022] [Accepted: 06/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim The aim of the current study is to investigate the impact of primary compared to secondary chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) prophylaxis with NK1 receptor antagonists (NK1-RA) in patients affected by gastrointestinal malignancies and treated with oxaliplatin- and/or irinotecan-based doublet or triplet regimens. Study design and methods Clinical data of patients affected by gastrointestinal malignancies, treated with an oxaliplatin and/or irinotecan-based doublet or triplet regimen as neo/adjuvant or advanced-line treatment, and who received NK1-RA as primary (from the first cycle of treatment) or secondary (after the onset of CINV with a previous regimen with 5HT3-RA and dexamethasone) prophylaxis for CINV, were retrospectively collected in an observational study involving 16 Italian centers. A propensity score matching was performed by taking into account the following stratification factors: sex (male vs. female), age (< vs. ≥70 years old), overweight (body mass index, BMI < vs. ≥25), underweight (BMI < vs. ≥19), disease spread (early vs. advanced/metastatic), tumor type (esophagogastric cancer vs. the rest, hepatobiliary tumor vs. the rest, colorectal cancer vs. the rest), type of NK1-RA used as primary/secondary prophylaxis (netupitant-palonosetron vs. fosaprepitant/aprepitant), concomitant use of opioids (yes vs. no), concomitant use of antidepressant/antipsychotic drugs (yes vs. no), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status at the start of NK1-RA treatment (0 vs. 1–2), and intensity of chemotherapy regimen (doublet vs. triplet). Results Among 409 patients included from January 2015 to January 2022 and eligible for analysis, 284 (69%) and 125 (31%) were treated with NK1-RA as primary and secondary antiemetic prophylaxis, respectively. After matching, primary NK1-RA use was not associated with higher rates of protection from emesis regardless the emesis phase (acute phase, p = 0.34; delayed phase, p = 0.14; overall phase, p = 0.80). On the other hand, a lower rate of relevant nausea (p = 0.02) and need for rescue antiemetic therapy (p = 0.000007) in the overall phase was found in primary NK1-RA users. Furthermore, a higher rate of both complete antiemetic response (p = 0.00001) and complete antiemetic protection (p = 0.00007) in the overall phase was more frequently observed in primary NK1-RA users. Finally, chemotherapy delays (p = 0.000009) and chemotherapy dose reductions (p = 0.0000006) were less frequently observed in primary NK1-RA users. Conclusion In patients affected by gastrointestinal malignancies, a primary CINV prophylaxis with NK1-RA, 5HT3-RA, and dexamethasone might be appropriate, particularly in those situations at higher risk of emesis and in which it is important to avoid dose delays and/or dose reductions, keeping a proper dose intensity of chemotherapy drugs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandro Parisi
- Clinica Oncologica e Centro Regionale di Genetica Oncologica, Università Politecnica delle Marche, AOU Ospedali Riuniti-Ancona, Ancona, Italy
- Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L’Aquila, L’Aquila, Italy
- *Correspondence: Alessandro Parisi,
| | - Riccardo Giampieri
- Clinica Oncologica e Centro Regionale di Genetica Oncologica, Università Politecnica delle Marche, AOU Ospedali Riuniti-Ancona, Ancona, Italy
| | - Alex Mammarella
- Clinica Oncologica e Centro Regionale di Genetica Oncologica, Università Politecnica delle Marche, AOU Ospedali Riuniti-Ancona, Ancona, Italy
| | - Cristiano Felicetti
- Clinica Oncologica e Centro Regionale di Genetica Oncologica, Università Politecnica delle Marche, AOU Ospedali Riuniti-Ancona, Ancona, Italy
| | - Lisa Salvatore
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
- Medical Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Maria Bensi
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
- Medical Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Maria Grazia Maratta
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
- Medical Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Antonia Strippoli
- Medical Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Roberto Filippi
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Torino, Italy
- S.C Oncologia Medica 1, Centro Oncologico Ematologico Subalpino (COES), Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - Maria Antonietta Satolli
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Torino, Italy
- S.C Oncologia Medica 1, Centro Oncologico Ematologico Subalpino (COES), Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Torino, Italy
| | | | - Bruno Daniele
- Medical Oncology Unit, Ospedale del Mare, Naples, Italy
| | - Michele De Tursi
- Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences and Center for Advance Studies and Technology (CAST), G. D’Annunzio University, Chieti, Italy
- Clinical Oncology Unit, S.S. Annunziata Hospital, Chieti, Italy
| | - Pietro Di Marino
- Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences and Center for Advance Studies and Technology (CAST), G. D’Annunzio University, Chieti, Italy
- Clinical Oncology Unit, S.S. Annunziata Hospital, Chieti, Italy
| | - Guido Giordano
- Medical Oncology Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
| | - Matteo Landriscina
- Medical Oncology Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Silverio Tomao
- Department of Radiological, Oncological and Anatomo-Pathological Sciences, Medical Oncology Unit A, Policlinico Umberto I, ‘Sapienza’ University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Ilaria Depetris
- Medical Oncology, ASL TO4, Ospedale Civile di Ivrea, Turin, Italy
| | | | | | - Davide Ciardiello
- Oncology Unit, Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza Hospital, San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy
- Oncology Unit, Department of Precision Medicine, Università degli Studi della Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Naples, Italy
| | | | - Ornella Garrone
- Medical Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milano, Italy
| | - Barbara Galassi
- Medical Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milano, Italy
| | - Claudio Ferri
- Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L’Aquila, L’Aquila, Italy
| | - Rossana Berardi
- Clinica Oncologica e Centro Regionale di Genetica Oncologica, Università Politecnica delle Marche, AOU Ospedali Riuniti-Ancona, Ancona, Italy
| | - Michele Ghidini
- Medical Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milano, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Granata V, Fusco R, Venanzio Setola S, Sassaroli C, De Franciscis S, Delrio P, Danti G, Grazzini G, Faggioni L, Gabelloni M, Ottaiano A, Greggi S, Patrone R, Palaia R, Petrillo A, Izzo F. Radiological assessment of peritoneal carcinomatosis: a primer for resident. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2022; 26:2875-2890. [PMID: 35503632 DOI: 10.26355/eurrev_202204_28619] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
The imaging has critical responsibility in the assessment of peritoneal lesions along with estimating the overall extent. Valuing disease burden is crucial for selection of combining cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and intraperitoneal hyperthermic chemotherapy (HIPEC) treatment. An approach that combines the strength of several imaging tools and increases diagnostic accuracy, should be chosen, even if the preferred imaging tool in patients with suspected Peritoneal Carcinomatosis (PC) is CT. The outcomes of PC are mainly correlated to tumor spread, localization, and lesion size. Accurate assessment of these features is critical for prognosis and treatment planning. These data can be evaluated by Peritoneal Cancer Index (PCI), a quantitative index suggested by Harman and Sugarbaker. Additionally, precise predictive biomarkers should be established to predict PC in patients at risk. The radiomics analysis could predict PC throughout the evaluation of cancers heterogeneity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V Granata
- Division of Radiology, "Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale - IRCCS di Napoli", Naples, Italy.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Lengyel CG, Hussain S, Seeber A, Jamil Nidhamalddin S, Trapani D, Habeeb BS, Elfaham E, Mazher SA, Seid F, Khan SZ, El Bairi K, Odhiambo A, Altuna SC, Petrillo A. FGFR Pathway Inhibition in Gastric Cancer: The Golden Era of an Old Target? Life (Basel) 2022; 12:81. [PMID: 35054474 PMCID: PMC8778800 DOI: 10.3390/life12010081] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2021] [Revised: 01/02/2022] [Accepted: 01/04/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Gastric cancer (GC) is the third leading cause of cancer-associated death worldwide. The majority of patients are diagnosed at an advanced/metastatic stage of disease due to a lack of specific symptoms and lack of screening programs, especially in Western countries. Thus, despite the improvement in GC therapeutic opportunities, the survival is disappointing, and the definition of the optimal treatment is still an unmet need. Novel diagnostic techniques were developed in clinical trials in order to characterize the genetic profile of GCs and new potential molecular pathways, such as the Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor (FGFR) pathway, were identified in order to improve patient's survival by using target therapies. The aim of this review is to summarize the role and the impact of FGFR signaling in GC and to provide an overview regarding the potential effectiveness of anti-FGFR agents in GC treatment in the context of precision medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Csongor G. Lengyel
- Head and Neck Surgery, National Institute of Oncology, 1122 Budapest, Hungary;
| | - Sadaqat Hussain
- Oncology Department, University Hospital of Leicester, Leicester LE1 5WW, UK;
| | - Andreas Seeber
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Innsbruck, Department of Hematology and Oncology, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria;
| | | | | | - Baker S. Habeeb
- Medical Oncology, Shaqlawa Teaching Hospital, Erbil 44001, Iraq;
| | - Essam Elfaham
- Department of Hematoncology, Kuwait Cancer Control Center (KCCC), Kuwait City 20001, Kuwait;
| | - Syed Ayub Mazher
- Division of Internal Medicine, UT Southwestern Clements University Hospital, Dallas, TX 75390, USA;
| | - Fahmi Seid
- Department of Oncology, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Hawassa University, Hawassa 1560, Ethiopia;
| | - Shah Z. Khan
- Department of Clinical Oncology, BINOR Cancer Hospital, Bannu 28000, Pakistan;
| | | | - Andrew Odhiambo
- Unit of Medical Oncology, Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Nairobi, Nairobi 00202, Kenya;
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Granata V, Fusco R, Venanzio Setola S, Barretta ML, Iasevoli DMA, Palaia R, Belli A, Patrone R, Tatangelo F, Grazzini G, Grassi R, Grassi F, Grassi R, Anselmo A, Izzo F, Petrillo A. Diagnostic performance of LI-RADS in adult patients with rare hepatic tumors. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2022; 26:399-414. [PMID: 35113415 DOI: 10.26355/eurrev_202201_27864] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The rare hepatic tumor can have a wide spectrum of radiologic features, representing a diagnostic challenge. Our purpose is to report the experience of a National Cancer Center, emphasizing the radiological features encountered and assessing the LR-M categories in the diagnostic performances for these lesions. PATIENTS AND METHODS We assessed 113 patients who underwent surgical resection or biopsy for rare liver lesions from May 2010 to December 2020. For these patients a computerized search of radiological records was performed to identify which had been studied with MRI and CT. For each lesion, the radiologists recorded the attenuation on CT studies and signal intensity (SI) in T1 weighted (W), in T2-W, DWI and in the related map of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC). We assessed the presence and the type of contrast enhancement (CE) during contrast study on CT and MRI and the enhancement was categorized according to LI-RADS 2018. We also assessed the presence of other features in LR-M categories (ancillary LR-M features) in order to classify different subgroups. The lesions were classified according to LR categories, and the gold standard was histological analysis. RESULTS The final study population included 95 patients (46 females and 49 males), with a mean age of 51 years (range 38-83 years). 83 patients had solid lesions, 12 patients had cystic lesions (simple or complex). According to histological analysis, we categorized 79 patients with malignant lesions and 16 patients with benign lesions. According to radiological features we assessed as malignant 82 patients (79 true malignant and 3 false malignant), as benign 13 patients (all true benign). Therefore, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy of radiological features to identify benign and malignant lesions were 100.0%, 81.3%, 96.3%, 100.0% and 96.8%, respectively. We found no significant difference in signal and contrast enhancement appearance among all LR-M categories (p-value =0.34 at Chi square test). However, among LR-M categories the presence of satellite nodules was a feature typical of cHCC-CC (p-value < 0.05 at Chi square test). The presence of intra lesion necrosis and haemorrhage was suggestive of sarcoma (p-value < 0.05 at Chi square test). CONCLUSIONS High diagnostic accuracy was obtained by LI-RADS classification between malignant and benign lesion. The presence of ancillary features could help the radiologist towards a correct diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V Granata
- Division of Radiology, "Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale - IRCCS di Napoli", Naples, Italy.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Funingana IG, Reinius MAV, Petrillo A, Ang JE, Brenton JD. Can integrative biomarker approaches improve prediction of platinum and PARP inhibitor response in ovarian cancer? Semin Cancer Biol 2021; 77:67-82. [PMID: 33607245 DOI: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2021.02.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2020] [Revised: 02/06/2021] [Accepted: 02/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
Epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC) encompasses distinct histological, molecular and genomic entities that determine intrinsic sensitivity to platinum-based chemotherapy. Current management of each subtype is determined by factors including tumour grade and stage, but only a small number of biomarkers can predict treatment response. The recent incorporation of PARP inhibitors into routine clinical practice has underscored the need to personalise ovarian cancer treatment based on tumour biology. In this article, we review the strengths and limitations of predictive biomarkers in current clinical practice and highlight integrative strategies that may inform the development of future personalised medicine programs and composite biomarkers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ionut-Gabriel Funingana
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK; Cancer Research UK Cambridge Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK; Department of Oncology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Marika A V Reinius
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK; Cancer Research UK Cambridge Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK; Department of Oncology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK; Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Angelica Petrillo
- Medical Oncology Unit, Ospedale del Mare, Naples, Italy; University of Study of Campania "L.Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.
| | - Joo Ern Ang
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK; Department of Oncology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - James D Brenton
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK; Cancer Research UK Cambridge Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK; Department of Oncology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK; Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Parisi A, Cortellini A, Venditti O, Filippi R, Salvatore L, Tortora G, Ghidini M, Nigro O, Gelsomino F, Zurlo IV, Fulgenzi C, Lombardi P, Roselló Keränen S, Depetris I, Giampieri R, Morelli C, Di Marino P, Di Pietro FR, Zanaletti N, Vitale P, Garajova I, Spinelli GP, Zoratto F, Roberto M, Petrillo A, Aimar G, Patruno L, D'Orazio C, Ficorella C, Ferri C, Porzio G. Post-Induction Management in Patients With Left-Sided RAS and BRAF Wild-Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Treated With First-Line Anti-EGFR-Based Doublet Regimens: A Multicentre Study. Front Oncol 2021; 11:712053. [PMID: 34778029 PMCID: PMC8579084 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.712053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2021] [Accepted: 09/28/2021] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Few data regarding post-induction management following first-line anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-based doublet regimens in patients with left-sided RAS/BRAF wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) are available. Methods This multicenter, retrospective study aimed at evaluating clinicians’ attitude, and the safety and effectiveness of post-induction strategies in consecutive patients affected by left-sided RAS/BRAF wild-type mCRC treated with doublet chemotherapy plus anti-EGFR as first-line regimen, who did not experience disease progression within 6 months from induction initiation, at 21 Italian and 1 Spanish Institutions. The measured clinical outcomes were: progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), adverse events, and objective response rate (ORR). Results At the data cutoff, among 686 consecutive patients with left-sided RAS/BRAF wild-type mCRC treated with doublet plus anti-EGFR as first-line regimen from March 2012 to October 2020, 355 eligible patients have been included in the present analysis. Among these, 118 (33.2%), 66 (18.6%), and 11 (3.1%) received a maintenance with 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (5FU/LV)+anti-EGFR, anti-EGFR, and 5FU/LV, respectively, while 160 (45.1%) patients continued induction treatment (non-maintenance) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, patient decision, or completion of planned treatment. The median period of follow-up for the overall population was 33.7 months (95%CI = 28.9–35.6). The median PFS values of the 5FU/LV+anti-EGFR, anti-EGFR, 5FU/LV, and non-maintenance cohorts were 16.0 (95%CI = 14.3–17.7, 86 events), 13.0 (95%CI = 11.4–14.5, 56 events), 14.0 (95%CI = 8.1–20.0, 8 events), and 10.1 months (95%CI = 9.0–11.2, 136 events), respectively (p < 0.001). The median OS values were 39.6 (95%CI = 31.5–47.7, 43 events), 36.1 (95%CI = 31.6–40.7, 36 events), 39.5 (95%CI = 28.2–50.8, 4 events), and 25.1 months (95%CI = 22.6–27.6, 99 events), respectively (p < 0.001). After adjusting for key covariates, a statistically significant improvement in PFS in favor of 5FU/LV+anti-EGFR (HR = 0.59, 95%CI = 0.44–0.77, p < 0.001) and anti-EGFR (HR = 0.71, 95%CI = 0.51–0.98, p = 0.039) compared to the non-maintenance cohort was found. Compared to the non-maintenance cohort, OS was improved by 5FU/LV+anti-EGFR (HR = 0.55, 95%CI = 0.38–0.81, p = 0.002) and, with marginal significance, by anti-EGFR (HR = 0.67, 95%CI = 0.51–0.98, p = 0.051). No difference was found in ORR. Any grade non-hematological and hematological events were generally higher in the non-maintenance compared to the maintenance cohorts. Conclusion Among the treatment strategies following an anti-EGFR-based doublet first-line induction regimen in patients affected by left-sided RAS/BRAF wild-type mCRC treated in a “real-life” setting, 5FU/LV+anti-EGFR resulted the most adopted, effective, and relatively safe regimen.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandro Parisi
- Medical Oncology, St. Salvatore Hospital, L'Aquila, Italy.,Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Alessio Cortellini
- Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.,Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Olga Venditti
- Medical Oncology, St. Salvatore Hospital, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Roberto Filippi
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.,Division of Medical Oncology, Candiolo Cancer Institute, Fondazione Del Piemonte Per L'oncologia-Istiruto di Ricerca e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (FPO-IRCCS), Candiolo, Italy.,Centro Oncologico Ematologico Subalpino, Azienda Universitaria Ospedaliera Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Lisa Salvatore
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.,Medical Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Giampaolo Tortora
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.,Medical Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Michele Ghidini
- Medical Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Olga Nigro
- Medical Oncology, ASST Sette Laghi, Ospedale di Circolo e Fondazione Macchi, Varese, Italy
| | - Fabio Gelsomino
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, Division of Oncology, University Hospital of Modena, Modena, Italy
| | | | - Claudia Fulgenzi
- Medical Oncology, Campus Bio-Medico, University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Pasquale Lombardi
- Division of Medical Oncology, Candiolo Cancer Institute, Fondazione Del Piemonte Per L'oncologia-Istiruto di Ricerca e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (FPO-IRCCS), Candiolo, Italy
| | - Susana Roselló Keränen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, INCLIVA Biomedical Research Institute, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.,CIBERONC, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ilaria Depetris
- Medical Oncology, ASL TO4, Ospedale Civile di Ivrea, Turin, Italy
| | - Riccardo Giampieri
- Clinica Oncologica e Centro Regionale di Genetica Oncologica, Università Politecnica delle Marche, AOU Ospedali Riuniti-Ancona, Ancona, Italy
| | - Cristina Morelli
- Medical Oncology Unit and PhD Program in Systems and Experimental Medicine (XXXV cycle), Tor Vergata University Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Pietro Di Marino
- Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences and Center for Advance Studies and Technology (CAST), G. D'Annunzio University, Chieti, Italy.,Clinical Oncology Unit, S.S. Annunziata Hospital, Chieti, Italy
| | | | - Nicoletta Zanaletti
- Experimental Clinical Abdominal Oncology Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G.Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - Pasquale Vitale
- Department of Precision Medicine, Università della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy
| | - Ingrid Garajova
- Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Gian Paolo Spinelli
- UOC Territorial Oncology-AUSL Latina-CdS Aprilia-University of Rome "Sapienza", Rome, Italy
| | | | - Michela Roberto
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Oncology Unit, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Giacomo Aimar
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.,Division of Medical Oncology, Candiolo Cancer Institute, Fondazione Del Piemonte Per L'oncologia-Istiruto di Ricerca e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (FPO-IRCCS), Candiolo, Italy
| | - Leonardo Patruno
- Medical Oncology, St. Salvatore Hospital, L'Aquila, Italy.,Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Carla D'Orazio
- Medical Oncology, St. Salvatore Hospital, L'Aquila, Italy.,Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Corrado Ficorella
- Medical Oncology, St. Salvatore Hospital, L'Aquila, Italy.,Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Claudio Ferri
- Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Giampiero Porzio
- Medical Oncology, St. Salvatore Hospital, L'Aquila, Italy.,Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Antonetti P, Fargnoli MC, Porzio G, Salvatore L, Filippi R, Ghidini M, Nigro O, Gelsomino F, Zurlo IV, Dell'Aquila E, Lombardi P, Keränen SR, Depetris I, Giampieri R, Morelli C, De Tursi M, Di Pietro FR, Zanaletti N, Vitale P, Garajova I, Spinelli GP, Zoratto F, Roberto M, Petrillo A, Aimar G, Cortellini A, Pensieri MV, Ficorella C, Ferri C, Parisi A. A multicenter study of skin toxicity management in patients with left-sided, RAS/BRAF wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer treated with first-line anti-EGFR-based doublet regimen: is there room for improvement? Support Care Cancer 2021; 30:2455-2465. [PMID: 34779921 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-021-06652-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2021] [Accepted: 10/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Skin toxicity in patients affected by metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treated with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors is well known. However, ad hoc ESMO guidelines have only recently been published. AIM AND METHODS To describe the management (pre-emptive or reactive) of anti-EGFR-related cutaneous adverse events (AEs), in a real-life clinical context, in a selected population of patients with left-sided, metastatic RAS/BRAF wild-type mCRC treated with doublet chemotherapy plus anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody (i.e., panitumumab or cetuximab) as first-line regimen at 22 Institutions. The measured clinical outcomes were treatment-related adverse events, objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS Of 515 patients included in the analysis, 173 (33.6%) received a pre-emptive and 342 (66.4%) a reactive treatment. The median follow-up period for the overall population was 30.0 months. A significantly lower incidence of any grade acneiform rash was found in the pre-emptive compared to the reactive cohort both in the overall population (78.6% vs 94.4%, p < 0.001) and in patients treated with panitumumab (76.1% vs 93.7%, p < 0.001) or cetuximab (83.3% vs 95.4%, p = 0.004), respectively. A lower incidence of any grade (41.6% vs 50.9%, p = 0.047) but a higher incidence of G3-G4 (9.2% vs 4.7%, p = 0.042) paronychia/nail disorders were found in the pre-emptive compared to the reactive cohort. Nevertheless, a lower rate of patients within the reactive compared to the pre-emptive cohort was referred to dermatological counseling (21.4% vs 15.3%, respectively, p = 0.001). A higher rate of anti-EGFR therapy modification was needed in the pre-emptive compared to the reactive cohort (35.9% vs 41.6%, respectively, p < 0.001). The pre-emptive approach did not reduce the efficacy of antineoplastic therapy compared to the reactive in terms of ORR (69.2% vs 72.8%), median PFS (12.3 vs 13.0 months), and median OS (28.8 vs 33.5 months). CONCLUSION Although recommended by international guidelines, the pre-emptive approach of anti-EGFR-related skin toxicity in mCRC patients still appears less adopted in daily clinical practice, compared to the reactive one. A wider reception and application of this indication is desirable to improve patients' quality of life without compromising the continuity and efficacy of antineoplastic therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paolo Antonetti
- Dermatology, St. Salvatore Hospital, L'Aquila, Italy.,Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, Via Vetoio, Coppito 2, 67100, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Maria Concetta Fargnoli
- Dermatology, St. Salvatore Hospital, L'Aquila, Italy. .,Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, Via Vetoio, Coppito 2, 67100, L'Aquila, Italy.
| | - Giampiero Porzio
- Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, Via Vetoio, Coppito 2, 67100, L'Aquila, Italy.,Medical Oncology, St. Salvatore Hospital, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Lisa Salvatore
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.,Medical Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Roberto Filippi
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Torino, Italy.,Division of Medical Oncology, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO - IRCCS, Candiolo, TO, Italy.,Centro Oncologico Ematologico Subalpino, Azienda Universitaria Ospedaliera Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - Michele Ghidini
- Medical Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milano, Italy
| | - Olga Nigro
- Medical Oncology, ASST Sette Laghi, Ospedale di Circolo e Fondazione Macchi, Varese, Italy
| | - Fabio Gelsomino
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, Division of Oncology, University Hospital of Modena, Modena, Italy
| | | | | | - Pasquale Lombardi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, INCLIVA Biomedical Research Institute, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | | | - Ilaria Depetris
- Medical Oncology, ASL TO4, Ospedale Civile di Ivrea, Ivrea, Turin, Italy
| | - Riccardo Giampieri
- Clinica Oncologica e Centro Regionale di Genetica Oncologica, Università Politecnica delle Marche, AOU Ospedali Riuniti, Ancona, Italy
| | - Cristina Morelli
- Medical Oncology Unit and PhD program in Systems and Experimental Medicine (XXXV cycle), Tor Vergata University Hospital, Viale Oxford, 81, 00133, Rome, Italy
| | - Michele De Tursi
- Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences and Center for Advance Studies and Technology (CAST), G. D'Annunzio University, Chieti, Italy.,Clinical Oncology Unit, S.S. Annunziata Hospital, Chieti, Italy
| | | | - Nicoletta Zanaletti
- Experimental Clinical Abdominal Oncology Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G.Pascale, Napoli, Italy
| | - Pasquale Vitale
- Department of Precision Medicine, Università della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", 80131, Napoli, Italy.,Medical Oncology Unit, Santa Chiara Hospital, Trento, Italy
| | - Ingrid Garajova
- Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, Via Gramsci 14, 43126, Parma, Italy
| | - Gian Paolo Spinelli
- UOC Territorial Oncology - AUSL Latina-CdS Aprilia - University of Rome "Sapienza", Latina, Italy
| | | | - Michela Roberto
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Oncology Unit, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Giacomo Aimar
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.,Medical Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Alessio Cortellini
- Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, Via Vetoio, Coppito 2, 67100, L'Aquila, Italy.,Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Maria Vittoria Pensieri
- Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, Via Vetoio, Coppito 2, 67100, L'Aquila, Italy.,Medical Oncology, St. Salvatore Hospital, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Corrado Ficorella
- Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, Via Vetoio, Coppito 2, 67100, L'Aquila, Italy.,Medical Oncology, St. Salvatore Hospital, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Claudio Ferri
- Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Alessandro Parisi
- Medical Oncology, St. Salvatore Hospital, L'Aquila, Italy.,Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Khakoo S, Petrillo A, Salati M, Muhith A, Evangelista J, Seghezzi S, Petrelli F, Tomasello G, Ghidini M. Neoadjuvant Treatment for Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: A False Promise or an Opportunity to Improve Outcome? Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13174396. [PMID: 34503206 PMCID: PMC8431597 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13174396] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2021] [Revised: 08/23/2021] [Accepted: 08/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Pancreatic cancer usually presents late when it has spread to distant sites. In a small proportion of patients, the cancer can be removed by surgery. Surgery is usually followed by chemotherapy, as studies have shown that this improves survival. However, due to complications after surgery and a decline in fitness, some patients do not start their chemotherapy and many do not complete the planned course. The cancer returns in the majority of patients. Chemotherapy or a combination of chemotherapy and radiotherapy before surgery are being investigated to improve survival. The best treatment regime and patient selection for different treatment strategies remains to be defined and is discussed here. Abstract Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has an aggressive tumor biology and is associated with poor survival outcomes. Most patients present with metastatic or locally advanced disease. In the 10–20% of patients with upfront resectable disease, surgery offers the only chance of cure, with the addition of adjuvant chemotherapy representing an established standard of care for improving outcomes. Despite resection followed by adjuvant chemotherapy, at best, 3-year survival reaches 63.4%. Post-operative complications and poor performance mean that around 50% of the patients do not commence adjuvant chemotherapy, and a significant proportion do not complete the intended treatment course. These factors, along with the advantages of early treatment of micrometastatic disease, the ability to downstage tumors, and the increase in R0 resection rates, have increased interest in neo-adjuvant treatment strategies. Here we review biomarkers for early diagnosis of PDAC and patient selection for a neo-adjuvant approach. We also review the current evidence for different chemotherapy regimens in this setting, as well as the role of chemoradiotherapy and immunotherapy, and we discuss ongoing trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shelize Khakoo
- Department of Medicine, Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, Surrey SM2 5PT, UK;
- Correspondence: (S.K.); (M.G.); Tel.: +39-02-5503-2660 (M.G.); Fax: +39-02-5503-2659 (M.G.)
| | - Angelica Petrillo
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Precision Medicine, Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, 80131 Naples, Italy;
- Oncology Unit, Ospedale del Mare, 80147 Naples, Italy
| | - Massimiliano Salati
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41125 Modena, Italy;
| | - Abdul Muhith
- Department of Medicine, Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, Surrey SM2 5PT, UK;
| | - Jessica Evangelista
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy;
| | - Silvia Seghezzi
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, ASST Bergamo Ovest, 24047 Treviglio, Italy;
| | - Fausto Petrelli
- Oncology Unit, Medical Sciences Department, ASST Bergamo Ovest, 24047 Treviglio, Italy;
| | - Gianluca Tomasello
- Medical Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy;
| | - Michele Ghidini
- Medical Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy;
- Correspondence: (S.K.); (M.G.); Tel.: +39-02-5503-2660 (M.G.); Fax: +39-02-5503-2659 (M.G.)
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Pappalardo A, Giunta EF, Tirino G, Pompella L, Federico P, Daniele B, De Vita F, Petrillo A. Adjuvant Treatment in Pancreatic Cancer: Shaping the Future of the Curative Setting. Front Oncol 2021; 11:695627. [PMID: 34485130 PMCID: PMC8415474 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.695627] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2021] [Accepted: 06/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a lethal disease even in the early stages, despite progresses in surgical and pharmacological treatment in recent years. High potential for metastases is the main cause of therapeutic failure in localized disease, highlighting the current limited knowledge of underlying pathological processes. However, nowadays research is focusing on the search for personalized approaches also in the adjuvant setting for PDAC, by implementing the use of biomarkers and investigating new therapeutic targets. In this context, the aim of this narrative review is to summarize the current treatment scenario and new potential therapeutic approaches in early stage PDAC, from both a preclinical and clinical point of view. Additionally, the review examines the role of target therapies in localized PDAC and the influence of neoadjuvant treatments on survival outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annalisa Pappalardo
- Medical Oncology Unit, Ospedale del Mare, Naples, Italy
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Precision Medicine, School of Medicine, University of study of Campania “L. Vanvitelli”, Naples, Italy
| | - Emilio Francesco Giunta
- Medical Oncology Unit, Ospedale del Mare, Naples, Italy
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Precision Medicine, School of Medicine, University of study of Campania “L. Vanvitelli”, Naples, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Tirino
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Precision Medicine, School of Medicine, University of study of Campania “L. Vanvitelli”, Naples, Italy
| | - Luca Pompella
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Precision Medicine, School of Medicine, University of study of Campania “L. Vanvitelli”, Naples, Italy
| | | | - Bruno Daniele
- Medical Oncology Unit, Ospedale del Mare, Naples, Italy
| | - Ferdinando De Vita
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Precision Medicine, School of Medicine, University of study of Campania “L. Vanvitelli”, Naples, Italy
| | - Angelica Petrillo
- Medical Oncology Unit, Ospedale del Mare, Naples, Italy
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Precision Medicine, School of Medicine, University of study of Campania “L. Vanvitelli”, Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Parisi A, Porzio G, Cannita K, Venditti O, Avallone A, Filippi R, Salvatore L, Tortora G, Ribelli M, Nigro O, Gelsomino F, Spallanzani A, Zurlo V, Leo S, Dell'Aquila E, Claudia F, Lombardi P, Keränen SR, Aimar G, Depetris I, Giampieri R, Morelli C, De Tursi M, Tinari N, Di Pietro FR, De Galitiis F, Zanaletti N, Troiani T, Vitale P, Garajova I, Ghidini M, Spinelli GP, Zoratto F, Roberto M, Ierino D, Petrillo A, D'Orazio C, Ficorella C, Cortellini A. Clinicians' Attitude to Doublet Plus Anti-EGFR Versus Triplet Plus Bevacizumab as First-line Treatment in Left-Sided RAS and BRAF Wild-Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients: A Multicenter, "Real-Life", Case-Control Study. Clin Colorectal Cancer 2021; 20:318-325. [PMID: 34380594 DOI: 10.1016/j.clcc.2021.07.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2021] [Revised: 07/06/2021] [Accepted: 07/06/2021] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Doublets plus antiepidermal growth factor receptors monoclonal antibodies (EGFRi) are widely considered the preferable first-line regimen in patients with left-sided RAS/BRAF wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), resulting superior in terms of activity and efficacy compared to doublets plus bevacizumab. However, data comparing doublet plus EGFRi and triplet plus bevacizumab are lacking, and the relative benefit of an intensive regimen plus an antiangiogenic backbone in this population is debated. METHODS This multicenter, retrospective study aimed at evaluating clinicians' attitude to triplet-bevacizumab and doublet-EGFRi as first-line regimen in patients with left-sided RAS/BRAF wild-type mCRC treated in clinical practice at 22 Oncology Units from March 2012 to October 2020. A random case-control matching was performed to compare activity (ORR), and effectiveness (PFS, OS, secondary resection rate of metastases with curative intent) between triplet-bevacizumab and doublet-EGFRi, on the basis of ECOG-PS, age, gender, and burden of disease. RESULTS A total of 718 patients were consecutively treated with doublet-EGFRi (686, 95.5%) or triplet-bevacizumab (32, 4.5%). After case-control matching, median PFS was 13.6 (95% CI, 8.9-31.7) and 16.1 (95% CI, 12.1-36.8) months (P= .621), while median OS was 30.2 (95% CI, 14.4-69.5) and 38.1 (95% CI, 33.1-101.1) months (P= .0283) in the doublet-EGFRi and the triplet-bevacizumab cohort, respectively. The ORR was 65.6% and 90.6% (P= .016), while the secondary resection rate was 18.8% and 46.9% (P= .016), in the doublet-EGFRi and the triplet-bevacizumab cohort, respectively. Triplet-bevacizumab was associated with a higher incidence of G3/G4 neutropenia (25.0% vs. 12.5%, P= .041). CONCLUSION Although a doublet-EGFRi remains the recommended upfront regimen in patients with left-sided RAS and BRAF wild-type mCRC, our real life data suggest a triplet-bevacizumab might be at least equally active and effective in properly selected cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandro Parisi
- Medical Oncology, St. Salvatore Hospital, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy; Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.
| | - Giampiero Porzio
- Medical Oncology, St. Salvatore Hospital, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy; Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Katia Cannita
- Medical Oncology, St. Salvatore Hospital, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Olga Venditti
- Medical Oncology, St. Salvatore Hospital, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Antonio Avallone
- Experimental Clinical Abdominal Oncology Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G.Pascale, Napoli, Italy
| | - Roberto Filippi
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Italy; Medical Oncology 1, Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Italy
| | - Lisa Salvatore
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy; Medical Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Giampaolo Tortora
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy; Medical Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Marta Ribelli
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy; Medical Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Olga Nigro
- Medical Oncology, ASST Sette Laghi, Ospedale di Circolo e Fondazione Macchi, Varese, Italy
| | - Fabio Gelsomino
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, Division of Oncology, University Hospital of Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Andrea Spallanzani
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, Division of Oncology, University Hospital of Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Valeria Zurlo
- Medical Oncology, "Vito Fazzi" Hospital, Lecce, Italy
| | - Silvana Leo
- Medical Oncology, "Vito Fazzi" Hospital, Lecce, Italy
| | | | - Fulgenzi Claudia
- Medical Oncology, Campus Bio-Medico, University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Susana Roselló Keränen
- Department of Medical Oncology. Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, INCLIVA Biomedical Research Institute, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.; CIBERONC, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Giacomo Aimar
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Italy; Division of Medical Oncology, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO - IRCCS, Candiolo (TO), Italy
| | - Ilaria Depetris
- Medical Oncology, ASL TO4, Ospedale Civile di Ivrea, Ivrea, Turin, Italy
| | - Riccardo Giampieri
- Clinica Oncologica e Centro Regionale di Genetica Oncologica, Università Politecnica delle Marche, AOU Ospedali Riuniti-Ancona, Italy
| | - Cristina Morelli
- Medical Oncology Unit and PhD program in Systems and Experimental Medicine (XXXV cycle), Tor Vergata University Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Michele De Tursi
- Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, Center for Advance Studies and Technology (CAST), G. D'Annunzio University, Chieti, Italy; Clinical Oncology Unit, S.S. Annunziata Hospital, Chieti, Italy
| | - Nicola Tinari
- Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, Center for Advance Studies and Technology (CAST), G. D'Annunzio University, Chieti, Italy; Clinical Oncology Unit, S.S. Annunziata Hospital, Chieti, Italy
| | | | | | - Nicoletta Zanaletti
- Experimental Clinical Abdominal Oncology Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G.Pascale, Napoli, Italy
| | - Teresa Troiani
- Department of Precision Medicine, Università della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Napoli, Italy
| | - Pasquale Vitale
- Department of Precision Medicine, Università della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Napoli, Italy
| | - Ingrid Garajova
- Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Michele Ghidini
- Medical Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milano
| | - Gian Paolo Spinelli
- UOC Territorial Oncology - AUSL Latina-CdS Aprilia, University of Rome "Sapienza", Italy
| | | | - Michela Roberto
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Oncology Unit, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Debora Ierino
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Oncology Unit, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Carla D'Orazio
- Medical Oncology, St. Salvatore Hospital, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy; Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Corrado Ficorella
- Medical Oncology, St. Salvatore Hospital, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy; Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Alessio Cortellini
- Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy; Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Granata V, Grassi R, Fusco R, Izzo F, Brunese L, Delrio P, Avallone A, Pecori B, Petrillo A. Current status on response to treatment in locally advanced rectal cancer: what the radiologist should know. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2021; 24:12050-12062. [PMID: 33336723 DOI: 10.26355/eurrev_202012_23994] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
The assessment of tumor response, after neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy (nCRT), allows stratifying the patient in order to consider the proper therapeutical management. Histopathology analysis of the surgical specimen is considered the gold standard to assess tumour response and the definition of a complete cancer response is related to the clinical and endoscopic features, by direct evaluation of the rectal wall. However, imaging studies, especially Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) have provided additional parameters, as the evaluation of nodal or mesorectal status. MRI provides a radiological tumour regression grade (mrTRG) that is correlated with the pathologic tumor regression grade (pTRG). Functional MRI parameters have additional impending in early prediction of the efficacy of therapy and can be valuable in drug development processes. Some of functional methodologies are already part of clinical practice: diffusion-weighted MRI (DW-MRI) and perfusion imaging (dynamic contrast enhanced MRI [DCE-MRI]). Other technologies, such as radiomics with MRI are still in the experimental phase. An adequate radiological report describing the restaging of rectal cancer after nCRT should be a "structured report" to improve communication in a multidisciplinary team.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V Granata
- Division of Radiology, "Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale - IRCCS di Napoli", Naples, Italy.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Petrillo A, Salati M, Trapani D, Ghidini M. Circulating Tumor DNA as a Biomarker for Outcomes Prediction in Colorectal Cancer Patients. Curr Drug Targets 2021; 22:1010-1020. [PMID: 33155906 DOI: 10.2174/1389450121999201103194248] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2020] [Revised: 08/07/2020] [Accepted: 08/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) is a novel tool that has been investigated in several types of tumours, including colorectal cancer (CRC). In fact, the techniques based on liquid biopsies are proposed as appealing non-invasive alternatives to tissue biopsy, adding more insights into tumour molecular profile, heterogeneity and for cancer detection and monitoring. Additionally, some analysis showed that in CRC patients, ctDNA seems to act as a biomarker able to predict the outcome (prognostic role) and the response to treatments (predictive role). In particular, in the early stage CRC (stage I-III), it could represent a time marker of adjuvant therapy as well as a marker of minimal residual disease and recurrence risk in addition to the already recognized risk factors. In metastatic CRC, the analysis of molecular tumour profile by ctDNA has shown to have high concordance with the tissue biopsy at diagnosis. Additionally, some studies demonstrated that ctDNA level during the treatment was linked with the early response to treatment and prognosis. Finally, the quantitative analysis of ctDNA and copy number alterations may be useful in order to detect resistance to therapy at the time of progression of disease and to help in finding new therapeutic targets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Massimiliano Salati
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital of Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Dario Trapani
- Division of Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Michele Ghidini
- Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Ghidini M, Fusco N, Salati M, Khakoo S, Tomasello G, Petrelli F, Trapani D, Petrillo A. The Emergence of Immune-checkpoint Inhibitors in Colorectal Cancer Therapy. Curr Drug Targets 2021; 22:1021-1033. [PMID: 33563194 DOI: 10.2174/1389450122666210204204415] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2020] [Revised: 12/06/2020] [Accepted: 12/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Immunotherapy has revolutionized the treatment landscape in a number of solid tumors. In colorectal cancer, evidence suggests that microsatellite high (MSI-H) tumors are the most responsive to immune checkpoint blockade due to increased neo-antigen load and a favorable tumor microenvironment. Indeed, Pembrolizumab now represents a first-line option in such patients. However, MSI-H tumors represent the minority and a proportion of patients' progress despite initially responding. Trials are investigating different immunotherapy combinatorial strategies to enhance immune response in less immunogenic colorectal tumors. Such strategies include dual immune checkpoint blockade, combining immune checkpoint inhibitors with other treatment modalities such as radiotherapy, chemotherapy or other biological or targeted agents. Moreover, there is an increasing drive to identify biomarkers to better select patients most likely to respond to immunotherapy and understand intrinsic and acquired resistance mechanisms. Apart from MSI-H tumors, there is a strong rationale to suggest that tumors with alterations in DNA polymerase epsilon and DNA polymerase delta are also likely to respond to immunotherapy and trials in this subpopulation are underway. Other strategies such as priming O6-methylguanineDNA methyltransferase silenced tumors with alkylating agents to make them receptive to immune checkpoint blockade are also being investigated. Here we discuss different colorectal subpopulations together with their likelihood of response to immune checkpoint blockade and strategies to overcome barriers to a successful clinical outcome. We summarize evidence from published clinical trials and provide an overview of trials in progress whilst discussing newer immunotherapy strategies such as adoptive cell therapies and cancer vaccines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michele Ghidini
- Medical Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Nicola Fusco
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Italy
| | - Massimiliano Salati
- PhD Program, Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Shelize Khakoo
- Department of Medicine, The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London and Surrey, United Kingdom
| | - Gianluca Tomasello
- Medical Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Fausto Petrelli
- Medical Oncology Unit, Azienda Socio-Sanitaria Territoriale Bergamo Ovest, Treviglio, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Dario Trapani
- Division of Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Williet N, Petrillo A, Roth G, Ghidini M, Petrova M, Forestier J, Lopez A, Thoor A, Weislinger L, De Vita F, Taieb J, Phelip JM. Gemcitabine/Nab-Paclitaxel versus FOLFIRINOX in Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A European Multicenter Study. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13112797. [PMID: 34199796 PMCID: PMC8200096 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13112797] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2021] [Revised: 06/01/2021] [Accepted: 06/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (GN) and FOLFIRINOX (FFX) are two standard first-line therapies for metastatic pancreatic cancer (PC) but have rarely been compared, especially in patients with locally advanced PC (LAPC). By carefully selecting patients, it is likely these two regimens lead to similar survival outcomes. Through a multicenter European study, biases regarding practice habits are reduced. Hence, we observed no difference between GN and FFX as first-line treatments in patients with LAPC in terms of either survival, tumor response or tumor resection rate. Further trials are needed to confirm these data. Abstract Background: Gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (GN) and FOLFIRINOX (FFX) are two standard first-line therapies for metastatic pancreatic cancer (PC) but have rarely been compared, especially in patients with locally advanced PC (LAPC). Methods: This is a retrospective European multicenter study including patients with LAPC treated with either GN or FFX as the first-line therapy between 2010 and 2019. Coprimary objectives were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), both estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Results: A total of 147 patients (GN: n = 60; FFX: n = 87) were included. Tumor resection rates were similar between the two groups (16.7% vs. 16.1%; p = 1), with similar R0 resection rates (88.9%). Median PFS rates were not statistically different: 9 months (95% CI: 8–13.5) vs. 12.1 months (95% CI: 10.1–14.6; p = 0.8), respectively. Median OS rates were 15.7 months (95% CI: 12.6–20.2) and 16.7 months (95% CI: 14.8–20.4; p = 0.7), respectively. Abdominal pain at the baseline (HR = 2.03, p = 0.03), tumors located in the tail of the pancreas (HR = 4.35, p = 0.01), CA19-9 > 200 UI/L (HR = 2.03, p = 0.004) and tumor resection (HR = 0.37, p = 0.007) were independent prognostic factors for PFS, similarly to OS. CA19-9 ≤ 200 UI/L (OR = 2.6, p = 0.047) was predictive of the tumor response. Consolidation chemoradiotherapy, more often used in the FFX group (11.7% vs. 50.6%; p < 0.001), was not predictive. Conclusion: This retrospective study did not show any difference between GN and FFX as the first-line treatment in patients with LAPC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolas Williet
- Department of Hepatogastroenterology, University Hospital of Saint-Etienne, 42000 Saint-Etienne, France;
- Correspondence:
| | - Angelica Petrillo
- Department of Precision Medecine, University of Study of Campania «L. Vanvitelli», 81100 Naples, Italy; (A.P.); (F.D.V.)
| | - Gaël Roth
- Hepato-Gastroenterology Department, University Hospital of Grenoble, 38043 Grenoble, France; (G.R.); (A.T.)
| | - Michele Ghidini
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center, Hospital of Cremona, 26100 Cremona, Italy;
| | - Mila Petrova
- Department of Medical Oncology, MHAT Nadezhda, 1220 Sofia, Bulgaria;
| | - Julien Forestier
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, 69622 Lyon, France;
| | - Anthony Lopez
- Hepato-Gastroenterology Department, University Hospital of Nancy, 54500 Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France; (A.L.); (L.W.)
| | - Audrey Thoor
- Hepato-Gastroenterology Department, University Hospital of Grenoble, 38043 Grenoble, France; (G.R.); (A.T.)
| | - Lucie Weislinger
- Hepato-Gastroenterology Department, University Hospital of Nancy, 54500 Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France; (A.L.); (L.W.)
| | - Ferdinando De Vita
- Department of Precision Medecine, University of Study of Campania «L. Vanvitelli», 81100 Naples, Italy; (A.P.); (F.D.V.)
| | - Julien Taieb
- Department of Gastroenterology and Gastro-Intestinal Oncology, Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou, APHP, Paris Descartes University, Sorbonne Paris Cité, 75004 Paris, France;
| | - Jean Marc Phelip
- Department of Hepatogastroenterology, University Hospital of Saint-Etienne, 42000 Saint-Etienne, France;
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Trapani D, Lengyel CG, Habeeb BS, Altuna SC, Petrillo A, El Bairi K, Hussain S, Mazher SA, Elfaham EM, Curigliano G, Khan SZ. The global landscape of availability, accessibility and affordability of essential diagnostics and therapeutics for the management of HER2-positive breast cancer: The ONCOLLEGE-001 survey. J Cancer Policy 2021; 28:100285. [PMID: 35559914 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcpo.2021.100285] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2021] [Revised: 04/01/2021] [Accepted: 04/20/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
AIM OF THE STUDY Barriers in access to essential care are key determinants of disparities in cancer survival. Breast cancer (BC) is the most common cancer and lead cause of mortality among women, 60 % occurring in low- and middle-income countries (LMs). A quarter of BC are characterized by an over-expression of the epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2). Valuable strategies to diagnose and manage patients with HER2-positive BC have been determined and some considered essential health interventions. ONCOLLEGE-001 is a global survey of availability, accessibility, and affordability of essential HER2 diagnostics and therapeutics. METHOD A self-administered questionnaire was shared electronically to oncologists, identified from oncology networks. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, per income areas and geographic regions. RESULTS We received 191 responses (84 % response rate). The majority of the responders were from LMs (n = 153) and were physician providers. Immunohistochemistry was the most common HER2 diagnostics available (n = 185). A third of the responders from low/lower-middle and a half of upper-middle income countries had HER2 testing only in the private sector. Trastuzumab was not available for 8 %: when available, 15%-21% reported accessibility only as out-of-pocket expenditure; when not reimbursed, only 10 % of the providers could significantly offer this intervention. Availability of trastuzumab biosimilars was reported in more than a half of the responders (n = 107). CONCLUSION Stark disparities are reported, with high out-of-pocket expenses for HER2 testing and significant financial barriers to access trastuzumab treatments. Policy solutions are urgently warranted for the selection, prioritization, and reimbursement of essential health interventions, to result in improved population health. POLICY SUMMARY STATEMENT: the inclusion of essential services for cancer management should be assured and financed in the benefit packages of healthcare to all. Prioritizing high-value health interventions, including medicines and medical devices, is critical to deliver impactful programs on population health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Trapani
- European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
| | - C G Lengyel
- Head and Neck Surgery, National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary
| | - B S Habeeb
- Medical Oncology Department, Shaqlawa Teaching Hospital, Erbil, Iraq
| | - S C Altuna
- Department of Medical Oncology, Oncomedica C.A., Caracas, Venezuela
| | - A Petrillo
- Medical oncology unit, Ospedale del Mare, Naples, Italy
| | - K El Bairi
- Cancer Biomarkers Working Group, Oujda, Morocco
| | - S Hussain
- North West Cancer Center, Western Health and Social Care Trust, Altnagelvin Hospital, Londonderry BT47 6SB, UK
| | - S A Mazher
- UT Southwestern Clements University Hospital, Dallas, TX 75390, USA
| | - E M Elfaham
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria University Students Hospital, Alexandria, Egypt
| | - G Curigliano
- European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy; University of Milan, Department of Oncology and Hematology (DIPO), Milan, Italy
| | - S Z Khan
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Bannu Institute of Nuclear Medicine Oncology and Radiotherapy (BINOR), Bannu, KPK, Pakistan
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Raiano N, Raiano C, Mazio F, Rossi I, Bordino U, De Simone G, Fusco R, Granata V, Cerciello V, Setola SV, Petrillo A. Home mobile radiography service in the COVID-19 era. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2021; 25:3338-3341. [PMID: 33928621 DOI: 10.26355/eurrev_202104_25745] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Demographic changes in the Western world linked to the increase in the elderly population, life expectancy and above all cancer patients and chronically ill patients, often entrusted to home care or in healthcare residences, highlight an exponential increase in requests for diagnostic tests at home. Conventional radiographic examinations, such as thoracic, musculoskeletal and abdominal images are the most requested and are important first level diagnostic tests. To date and, in particular, in times of COVID-19 emergency, these patients need to be transferred to the hospital to perform radiological examinations which involve an increase in costs for the health system and an increased risk for the health of these patients, already often debilitated and immunocompromised. This article discussed the benefits of taking conventional chest x-rays directly at the patient's home.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Raiano
- Radiology Division, "Istituto Nazionale Tumori - IRCCS - Fondazione G. Pascale", Naples, Italy.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Granata V, Fusco R, Amato DM, Albino V, Patrone R, Izzo F, Petrillo A. Beyond the vascular profile: conventional DWI, IVIM and kurtosis in the assessment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2021; 24:7284-7293. [PMID: 32706066 DOI: 10.26355/eurrev_202007_21883] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe the role of the Diffusion Weighted Imaging (DWI) in the assessment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS Several electronic databases were evaluated in the present review. The search included articles published from January 2010 to May 2019. The references of all articles were also evaluated. All titles and abstracts were assessed, and only the studies of DWI in patients with HCC were retained. RESULTS HCC is the most common primitive hepatic cancer. The non-invasive radiological criteria for HCC diagnosis are based on the presence of the specific vascular profile characterized by contrast uptake during arterial phase, defined as arterial hyperenhancement, followed by washout in the venous/portal phase. However, arterial hyperenhancement and wash out appearance have a sensitivity rate of 50-60% in lesion smaller than 2 cm. Therefore, other functional parameters have been introduced in the detection and characterization of HCC nodules. DWI has been applied to liver imaging as an excellent tool for detection and characterization of focal liver lesions, increasing clinical confidence and decreasing false positives. The assessment of DW images can be done qualitatively and quantitatively, through the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) map. Intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) is a more sophisticated analysis, a biexponential model, to better defining the relationship between signal attenuation and increasing b value that separately reproduces tissue diffusivity and tissue perfusion. Traditionally DWI approach to analyze data is founded on the hypothesis that water molecules diffuse within a voxel following a single direction with a Gaussian behavior without any restriction. However, according to the presence of microstructures, water molecules within biologic tissues exhibits a non-Gaussian phenomena proposed by Jensen in 2005 called Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging (DKI). This approach assesses the kurtosis coefficient (K) that shows the deviance of diffusion from a Gaussian approach, and the diffusion coefficient (D) with the correction of non-Gaussian bias. DKI is an advanced DWI model that quantifies non-Gaussian behavior of diffusion and provides both a corrected ADC, as well as the excess kurtosis of tissue, a measure of the extent to which tissue diffusion deviates from a Gaussian pattern. It is believed that the DKI model is more sensitive to tissue microstructural complexity than standard DW. CONCLUSIONS DWI should be an integral part of study protocol for HCC patients, considering the great advantages due to DWI and DWI-based approaches in detection and characterization of HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V Granata
- Department of Radiology, "Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale - IRCCS di Napoli", Naples, Italy.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Granata V, Palaia R, Albino V, Piccirillo M, Venanzio Setola S, Petrillo A, Izzo F. Electrochemotherapy of cholangiocellular carcinoma at hepatic hilum: a case report. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2021; 24:7051-7057. [PMID: 32633399 DOI: 10.26355/eurrev_202006_21698] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is the second most common primary hepatic malignancy after hepatocellular carcinoma. The current standard palliative treatment, chemotherapy regimen with gemcitabine and cisplatin, prolongs overall survival only of a few months. Established locoregional therapies are not a curative option or an alternative to surgery in the treatment of CCA. We report a case of a patient affected by a cholangiocellular carcinoma at hepatic hilum treated by Electrochemotherapy (ECT) at our oncologic center. CASE PRESENTATION A 71 years old male affected by a CCA at hepatic hilum was treated with ECT according to ESOPE guidelines. No complications occurred during ECT procedure. The patient was discharged after 10 days. The functional MR evaluation at 2 and at 4 months post-treatment showed a significant response without significant post-treatment adverse events. The Computed tomography (CT) assessment after 18 months did not show progression of disease. CONCLUSIONS ECT is safe and its use could be suggested as a palliative treatment of advanced neoplastic lesions in which radical surgical treatment is not possible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V Granata
- Division of Radiology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, IRCCS, Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Ghidini M, Petrillo A, Botticelli A, Trapani D, Parisi A, La Salvia A, Sajjadi E, Piciotti R, Fusco N, Khakoo S. How to Best Exploit Immunotherapeutics in Advanced Gastric Cancer: Between Biomarkers and Novel Cell-Based Approaches. J Clin Med 2021; 10:1412. [PMID: 33915839 PMCID: PMC8037391 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10071412] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2021] [Revised: 03/17/2021] [Accepted: 03/22/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Despite extensive research efforts, advanced gastric cancer still has a dismal prognosis with conventional treatment options. Immune checkpoint inhibitors have revolutionized the treatment landscape for many solid tumors. Amongst gastric cancer subtypes, tumors with microsatellite instability and Epstein Barr Virus positive tumors provide the strongest rationale for responding to immunotherapy. Various predictive biomarkers such as mismatch repair status, programmed death ligand 1 expression, tumor mutational burden, assessment of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes and circulating biomarkers have been evaluated. However, results have been inconsistent due to different methodologies and thresholds used. Clinical implementation therefore remains a challenge. The role of immune checkpoint inhibitors in gastric cancer is emerging with data from monotherapy in the heavily pre-treated population already available and studies in earlier disease settings with different combinatorial approaches in progress. Immune checkpoint inhibitor combinations with chemotherapy (CT), anti-angiogenics, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, anti-Her2 directed therapy, poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors or dual checkpoint inhibitor strategies are being explored. Moreover, novel strategies including vaccines and CAR T cell therapy are also being trialed. Here we provide an update on predictive biomarkers for response to immunotherapy with an overview of their strengths and limitations. We discuss clinical trials that have been reported and trials in progress whilst providing an account of future steps needed to improve outcome in this lethal disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michele Ghidini
- Medical Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | | | - Andrea Botticelli
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University, 00189 Rome, Italy;
- Medical Oncology (B), Policlinico Umberto I, 00161 Rome, Italy
| | - Dario Trapani
- Division of Early Drug Development for innovative therapies, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy;
| | - Alessandro Parisi
- Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L’Aquila, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy;
- Medical Oncology Unit, St. Salvatore Hospital, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy
| | - Anna La Salvia
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital 12 De Octubre, 28041 Madrid, Spain;
| | - Elham Sajjadi
- Division of Pathology, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (E.S.); (R.P.); (N.F.)
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Roberto Piciotti
- Division of Pathology, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (E.S.); (R.P.); (N.F.)
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Nicola Fusco
- Division of Pathology, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (E.S.); (R.P.); (N.F.)
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Shelize Khakoo
- Department of Medicine, Royal Marsden Hospital, London and Surrey, Sutton SM25PT, UK;
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Marte G, Tufo A, Steccanella F, Marra E, Federico P, Petrillo A, Maida P. Efficacy of Surgery for the Treatment of Gastric Cancer Liver Metastases: A Systematic Review of the Literature and Meta-Analysis of Prognostic Factors. J Clin Med 2021; 10:jcm10051141. [PMID: 33803135 PMCID: PMC7963158 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10051141] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2020] [Revised: 02/27/2021] [Accepted: 03/01/2021] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the last 10 years, the management of patients with gastric cancer liver metastases (GCLM) has changed from chemotherapy alone, towards a multidisciplinary treatment with liver surgery playing a leading role. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to assess the efficacy of hepatectomy for GCLM and to analyze the impact of related prognostic factors on long-term outcomes. METHODS The databases PubMed (Medline), EMBASE, and Google Scholar were searched for relevant articles from January 2010 to September 2020. We included prospective and retrospective studies that reported the outcomes after hepatectomy for GCLM. A systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis of prognostic factors was performed. RESULTS We included 40 studies, including 1573 participants who underwent hepatic resection for GCLM. Post-operative morbidity and 30-day mortality rates were 24.7% and 1.6%, respectively. One-year, 3-years, and 5-years overall survival (OS) were 72%, 37%, and 26%, respectively. The 1-year, 3-years, and 5-years disease-free survival (DFS) were 44%, 24%, and 22%, respectively. Well-moderately differentiated tumors, pT1-2 and pN0-1 adenocarcinoma, R0 resection, the presence of solitary metastasis, unilobar metastases, metachronous metastasis, and chemotherapy were all strongly positively associated to better OS and DFS. CONCLUSION In the present study, we demonstrated that hepatectomy for GCLM is feasible and provides benefits in terms of long-term survival. Identification of patient subgroups that could benefit from surgical treatment is mandatory in a multidisciplinary setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gianpaolo Marte
- Department of General Surgery, Ospedale del Mare, 80147 Naples, Italy; (A.T.); (F.S.); (E.M.); (P.M.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +39-08118775110
| | - Andrea Tufo
- Department of General Surgery, Ospedale del Mare, 80147 Naples, Italy; (A.T.); (F.S.); (E.M.); (P.M.)
| | - Francesca Steccanella
- Department of General Surgery, Ospedale del Mare, 80147 Naples, Italy; (A.T.); (F.S.); (E.M.); (P.M.)
| | - Ester Marra
- Department of General Surgery, Ospedale del Mare, 80147 Naples, Italy; (A.T.); (F.S.); (E.M.); (P.M.)
| | - Piera Federico
- Medical Oncology Unit, Ospedale del Mare, 80147 Naples, Italy; (P.F.); (A.P.)
| | - Angelica Petrillo
- Medical Oncology Unit, Ospedale del Mare, 80147 Naples, Italy; (P.F.); (A.P.)
| | - Pietro Maida
- Department of General Surgery, Ospedale del Mare, 80147 Naples, Italy; (A.T.); (F.S.); (E.M.); (P.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Federico P, Giunta EF, Pappalardo A, Tufo A, Marte G, Attademo L, Fabbrocini A, Petrillo A, Daniele B. How to Treat Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Elderly Patients. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 2021; 14:233. [PMID: 33800217 PMCID: PMC8001824 DOI: 10.3390/ph14030233] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2020] [Revised: 02/27/2021] [Accepted: 03/01/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the primary tumour of the liver with the greatest incidence, particularly in the elderly. Additionally, improvements in the treatments for chronic liver diseases have increased the number of elderly patients who might be affected by HCC. Little evidence exists regarding HCC in old patients, and the elderly are still underrepresented and undertreated in clinical trials. In fact, this population represents a complex subgroup of patients who are hard to manage, especially due to the presence of multiple comorbidities. Therefore, the choice of treatment is mainly decided by the physician in the clinical practice, who often tend not to treat elderly patients in order to avoid the possibility of adverse events, which may alter their unstable equilibrium. In this context, the clarification of the optimal treatment strategy for elderly patients affected by HCC has become an urgent necessity. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of the available data regarding the treatment of HCC in elderly patients, starting from the definition of "elderly" and the geriatric assessment and scales. We explain the possible treatment choices according to the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) scale and their feasibility in the elderly population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Piera Federico
- Medical Oncology Unit, Ospedale del Mare, 80147 Napoli, Italy; (E.F.G.); (A.P.); (L.A.); (A.F.); (A.P.); (B.D.)
| | - Emilio Francesco Giunta
- Medical Oncology Unit, Ospedale del Mare, 80147 Napoli, Italy; (E.F.G.); (A.P.); (L.A.); (A.F.); (A.P.); (B.D.)
- Department of Precision Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Study of Campania “L. Vanvitelli”, 80131 Napoli, Italy
| | - Annalisa Pappalardo
- Medical Oncology Unit, Ospedale del Mare, 80147 Napoli, Italy; (E.F.G.); (A.P.); (L.A.); (A.F.); (A.P.); (B.D.)
- Department of Precision Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Study of Campania “L. Vanvitelli”, 80131 Napoli, Italy
| | - Andrea Tufo
- Surgical Unit, Ospedale del Mare, 80147 Napoli, Italy; (A.T.); (G.M.)
| | - Gianpaolo Marte
- Surgical Unit, Ospedale del Mare, 80147 Napoli, Italy; (A.T.); (G.M.)
| | - Laura Attademo
- Medical Oncology Unit, Ospedale del Mare, 80147 Napoli, Italy; (E.F.G.); (A.P.); (L.A.); (A.F.); (A.P.); (B.D.)
| | - Antonietta Fabbrocini
- Medical Oncology Unit, Ospedale del Mare, 80147 Napoli, Italy; (E.F.G.); (A.P.); (L.A.); (A.F.); (A.P.); (B.D.)
| | - Angelica Petrillo
- Medical Oncology Unit, Ospedale del Mare, 80147 Napoli, Italy; (E.F.G.); (A.P.); (L.A.); (A.F.); (A.P.); (B.D.)
- Department of Precision Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Study of Campania “L. Vanvitelli”, 80131 Napoli, Italy
| | - Bruno Daniele
- Medical Oncology Unit, Ospedale del Mare, 80147 Napoli, Italy; (E.F.G.); (A.P.); (L.A.); (A.F.); (A.P.); (B.D.)
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Granata V, Fusco R, Venanzio Setola S, Mattace Raso M, Avallone A, De Stefano A, Nasti G, Palaia R, Delrio P, Petrillo A, Izzo F. Liver radiologic findings of chemotherapy-induced toxicity in liver colorectal metastases patients. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2020; 23:9697-9706. [PMID: 31799635 DOI: 10.26355/eurrev_201911_19531] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
There are a number of chemotherapy-effects that should be assessed with liver imaging since they have an influence on surgical morbidity. Chemotherapy-related complications, steatosis, chemotherapy-associated steatohepatitis (CASH), and SOS might impair the hepatic parenchyma, thus reducing the functionality and influencing the outcome following resection. The main role of a radiologist is to provide an accurate diagnosis of the lesion. With constant advances in medicine, a radiologist's role should extend beyond just reporting the data of tumor, providing additional information that may greatly improve patient care. Radiologists should assess both chemotherapy effects on the hepatic metastasis itself, as well as chemo-induced focal and diffuse modifications of non-tumor hepatic parenchyma, since it is important to avoid impaired hepatic function after hepatic resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V Granata
- Division of Radiology, Division of Abdominal Oncology, Division of Hepatobiliary Surgical Oncology; "Istituto Nazionale Tumori - IRCCS, Fondazione G. Pascale", Naples, Italy.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
El Bairi K, Trapani D, Petrillo A, Le Page C, Zbakh H, Daniele B, Belbaraka R, Curigliano G, Afqir S. Repurposing anticancer drugs for the management of COVID-19. Eur J Cancer 2020; 141:40-61. [PMID: 33125946 PMCID: PMC7508523 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2020.09.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2020] [Revised: 09/01/2020] [Accepted: 09/02/2020] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
Since its outbreak in the last December, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by SARS-CoV-2 has rapidly spread worldwide at a pandemic proportion and thus is regarded as a global public health emergency. The existing therapeutic options for COVID-19 beyond the intensive supportive care are limited, with an undefined or modest efficacy reported so far. Drug repurposing represents an enthusiastic mechanism to use approved drugs outside the scope of their original indication and accelerate the discovery of new therapeutic options. With the emergence of COVID-19, drug repurposing has been largely applied for early clinical testing. In this review, we discuss some repurposed anticancer drugs for the treatment of COVID-19, which are under investigation in clinical trials or proposed for the clinical testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Khalid El Bairi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Mohammed VI University Hospital, Oujda, Morocco.
| | | | - Angelica Petrillo
- Medical Oncology Unit, Ospedale del Mare, Naples, Italy; University of Study of Campania "L.Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy
| | - Cécile Le Page
- Research Institute of McGill University Health Center (RI-MUHC), Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Hanaa Zbakh
- Center of Marine Sciences, University of Algarve, Ed. 7, Campus of Gambelas, 8005-139, Faro, Portugal
| | - Bruno Daniele
- Medical Oncology Unit, Ospedale del Mare, Naples, Italy
| | - Rhizlane Belbaraka
- Department of Medical Oncology, "Bioscience et Santé" Research Laboratory, Faculty of Medicine, Cadi Ayad University, Marrakesh, Morocco
| | - Giuseppe Curigliano
- European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy; University of Milan, Department of Oncology and Hematology, Milan, Italy
| | - Said Afqir
- Department of Medical Oncology, Mohammed VI University Hospital, Oujda, Morocco
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Ottaviano M, Curvietto M, Rescigno P, Tortora M, Palmieri G, Giannarelli D, Aieta M, Assalone P, Attademo L, Avallone A, Bloise F, Bosso D, Borzillo V, Buono G, Calderoni G, Caputo F, Cartenì G, Cavallero D, Cavo A, Ciardiello F, Conca R, Conteduca V, De Falco S, De Felice M, De Laurentiis M, De Placido P, De Placido S, De Santo I, De Stefano A, Della Corte CM, Di Franco R, Di Lauro V, Fabbrocini A, Federico P, Festino L, Giordano P, Giuliano M, Gridelli C, Grimaldi AM, Lia M, Marretta AL, Massa V, Mennitto A, Merler S, Merz V, Messina C, Messina M, Milano M, Minisini AM, Montesarchio V, Morabito A, Morgillo F, Mucci B, Nappi L, Napolitano F, Paciolla I, Pagliuca M, Palmieri G, Parola S, Pepe S, Petrillo A, Piantedosi F, Piccin L, Picozzi F, Pietroluongo E, Pignata S, Prati V, Riccio V, Rosanova M, Rossi A, Russo A, Salati M, Santabarbara G, Sbrana A, Simeone E, Silvestri A, Spada M, Tarantino P, Taveggia P, Tomei F, Vincenzo T, Trapani D, Trojanello C, Vanella V, Vari S, Ventriglia J, Vitale MG, Vitiello F, Vivaldi C, von Arx C, Zacchi F, Zampiva I, Zivi A, Daniele B, Ascierto PA. Impact of COVID-19 outbreak on cancer immunotherapy in Italy: a survey of young oncologists. J Immunother Cancer 2020; 8:jitc-2020-001154. [PMID: 33060148 PMCID: PMC7565202 DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2020-001154] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/08/2020] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has overwhelmed the health systems worldwide. Data regarding the impact of COVID-19 on cancer patients (CPs) undergoing or candidate for immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are lacking. We depicted the practice and adaptations in the management of patients with solid tumors eligible or receiving ICIs during the COVID-19 pandemic, with a special focus on Campania region. Methods This survey (25 questions), promoted by the young section of SCITO (Società Campana di ImmunoTerapia Oncologica) Group, was circulated among Italian young oncologists practicing in regions variously affected by the pandemic: high (group 1), medium (group 2) and low (group 3) prevalence of SARS-CoV-2–positive patients. For Campania region, the physician responders were split into those working in cancer centers (CC), university hospitals (UH) and general hospitals (GH). Percentages of agreement, among High (H) versus Medium (M) and versus Low (L) group for Italy and among CC, UH and GH for Campania region, were compared by using Fisher’s exact tests for dichotomous answers and χ2 test for trends relative to the questions with 3 or more options. Results This is the first Italian study to investigate the COVID-19 impact on cancer immunotherapy, unique in its type and very clear in the results. The COVID-19 pandemic seemed not to affect the standard practice in the prescription and delivery of ICIs in Italy. Telemedicine was widely used. There was high consensus to interrupt immunotherapy in SARS-CoV-2–positive patients and to adopt ICIs with longer schedule interval. The majority of the responders tended not to delay the start of ICIs; there were no changes in supportive treatments, but some of the physicians opted for delaying surgeries (if part of patients’ planned treatment approach). The results from responders in Campania did not differ significantly from the national ones. Conclusion Our study highlights the efforts of Italian oncologists to maintain high standards of care for CPs treated with ICIs, regardless the regional prevalence of COVID-19, suggesting the adoption of similar solutions. Research on patients treated with ICIs and experiencing COVID-19 will clarify the safety profile to continue the treatments, thus informing on the most appropriate clinical conducts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Margaret Ottaviano
- Oncology Unit, Ospedale del Mare, Napoli, Campania, Italy.,Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II and CRCTR Coordinating Rare Tumors Reference Center of Campania Region, AOU Federico II, Napoli, Italy
| | - Marcello Curvietto
- Unit of Melanoma, Cancer Immunotherapy and Development Therapeutics, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, Napoli, Campania, Italy
| | - Pasquale Rescigno
- Clinical Studies, The Institute of Cancer Research and the Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Marianna Tortora
- CRCTR Coordinating Rare Tumors Reference Center of Campania Region, AOU Federico II, Napoli, Campania, Italy
| | - Giovannella Palmieri
- CRCTR Coordinating Rare Tumors Reference Center of Campania Region, AOU Federico II, Napoli, Campania, Italy
| | - Diana Giannarelli
- Biostatistics Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Roma, Lazio, Italy
| | - Michele Aieta
- Medical Oncology Unit, Department of Onco-Hematology, IRCCS-CROB Referral Cancer Center of Basilicata, Rionero in Vulture, Basilicata, Italy
| | - Pasquale Assalone
- Oncology Unit, Ospedale Ferdinando Veneziale, Isernia, Molise, Italy
| | - Laura Attademo
- Department of Urology and Gynecology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, Napoli, Campania, Italy
| | - Antonio Avallone
- Abdominal Oncology Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, Napoli, Campania, Italy
| | | | | | - Valentina Borzillo
- Department of Radioterapia, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, Napoli, Campania, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Buono
- Oncology Unit, San Rocco Hospital, Sessa Aurunca, Campania, Italy
| | | | - Francesca Caputo
- U.O.C. Oncologia, Azienda Ospedaliera dei Colli, Monaldi Hospital, Napoli, Campania, Italy
| | - Giacomo Cartenì
- Department of Medical Oncology, AORN "A. Cardarelli", Napoli, Campania, Italy
| | | | - Alessia Cavo
- Oncology Unit, Villa Scassi Hospital, Genova, Italy
| | - Fortunato Ciardiello
- Oncology, Department of Precision Medicine, Università della Campania "L. Vanvitelli", Napoli, Campania, Italy
| | - Raffaele Conca
- Medical Oncology Unit, Department of Onco-Hematology, IRCCS-CROB Referral Cancer Center of Basilicata, Rionero in Vulture, Basilicata, Italy
| | - Vincenza Conteduca
- Medical Oncology Department, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Meldola, Emilia-Romagna, Italy
| | - Stefano De Falco
- Oncology Unit, Sant'Ottone Frangipane Hospital, Avellino, Campania, Italy
| | - Marco De Felice
- Oncology, Department of Precision Medicine, Università della Campania "L. Vanvitelli", Napoli, Campania, Italy.,Oncology Unit, Sant'Anna e San Sebastiano, Caserta, Campania, Italy
| | | | - Pietro De Placido
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Oncology Unit, Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, Napoli, Campania, Italy
| | - Sabino De Placido
- CRCTR Coordinating Rare Tumors Reference Center of Campania Region, AOU Federico II, Napoli, Campania, Italy.,Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Oncology Unit, Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, Napoli, Campania, Italy
| | - Irene De Santo
- Oncology Unit, Gemelli Molise s.p.a, Campobasso, Molise, Italy
| | - Alfonso De Stefano
- Abdominal Oncology Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, Napoli, Campania, Italy
| | - Carminia Maria Della Corte
- Oncology, Department of Precision Medicine, Università della Campania "L. Vanvitelli", Napoli, Campania, Italy
| | - Rossella Di Franco
- Department of Radioterapia, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, Napoli, Campania, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Di Lauro
- Breast Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, Napoli, Campania, Italy.,Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Oncology Unit, Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, Napoli, Campania, Italy
| | | | | | - Lucia Festino
- Unit of Melanoma, Cancer Immunotherapy and Development Therapeutics, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, Napoli, Campania, Italy
| | | | - Mario Giuliano
- CRCTR Coordinating Rare Tumors Reference Center of Campania Region, AOU Federico II, Napoli, Campania, Italy.,Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Oncology Unit, Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, Napoli, Campania, Italy
| | - Cesare Gridelli
- Division of Medical Oncology, "San Giuseppe Moscati" Hospital, Avellino, Campania, Italy
| | - Antonio Maria Grimaldi
- Unit of Melanoma, Cancer Immunotherapy and Development Therapeutics, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, Napoli, Campania, Italy
| | - Michela Lia
- Oncology Unit, SS Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo Hospital, Alessandria, Piemonte, Italy
| | - Antonella Lucia Marretta
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Oncology Unit, Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, Napoli, Campania, Italy
| | - Valentina Massa
- Medical Oncology Unit, University of Pisa, Pisa, Toscana, Italy
| | - Alessia Mennitto
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Lombardia, Italy
| | - Sara Merler
- Department of Oncology, University of Verona, Verona, Veneto, Italy
| | - Valeria Merz
- Department of Medical Oncology, Santa Chiara Hospital, Trento, Trentino Alto Adige, Italy
| | - Carlo Messina
- Department of Medical Oncology, Santa Chiara Hospital, Trento, Trentino Alto Adige, Italy
| | - Marco Messina
- UOC Oncologia Medica, Ospedali Riuniti Villa Sofia Cervello, Palermo, Sicilia, Italy
| | - Monica Milano
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Lombardia, Italy
| | - Alessandro Marco Minisini
- Department of Oncology, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Integrata del Friuli Centrale, Udine, Friuli Venezia Giulia, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Montesarchio
- U.O.C. Oncologia, Azienda Ospedaliera dei Colli, Monaldi Hospital, Napoli, Campania, Italy
| | - Alessandro Morabito
- Thoracic Medical Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, Napoli, Campania, Italy
| | - Floriana Morgillo
- Oncology, Department of Precision Medicine, Università della Campania "L. Vanvitelli", Napoli, Campania, Italy
| | - Brigitta Mucci
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Oncology Unit, Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, Napoli, Campania, Italy
| | - Lucia Nappi
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada and British Columbia Cancer Agency-Vancouver Center-Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Fabiana Napolitano
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Oncology Unit, Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, Napoli, Campania, Italy
| | - Immacolata Paciolla
- Oncology Unit, Ospedale Sacro Cuore di Gesù Fatebenefratelli, Benevento, Campania, Italy
| | - Martina Pagliuca
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Oncology Unit, Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, Napoli, Campania, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Palmieri
- Institute of Research on Genetics and Biomedicine (IRGB), National Research Council (CNR), Sassari, Sardegna, Italy
| | - Sara Parola
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Oncology Unit, Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, Napoli, Campania, Italy
| | - Stefano Pepe
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry "Scuola Medica Salernitana", Oncology Unit, University of Salerno, Baronissi, Campania, Italy
| | - Angelica Petrillo
- Oncology Unit, Ospedale del Mare, Napoli, Italy.,Oncology, Department of Precision Medicine, Università della Campania "L. Vanvitelli", Napoli, Campania, Italy
| | - Francovito Piantedosi
- U.O.C. Pneumologia Oncologica, Azienda Ospedaliera dei Colli, Monaldi Hospital, Naples, Campania, Italy
| | - Luisa Piccin
- Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Padova, Veneto, Italy
| | - Fernanda Picozzi
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Oncology Unit, Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, Napoli, Campania, Italy
| | - Erica Pietroluongo
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Oncology Unit, Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, Napoli, Campania, Italy
| | - Sandro Pignata
- Department of Urology and Gynecology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, Napoli, Campania, Italy
| | | | - Vittorio Riccio
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Oncology Unit, Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, Napoli, Campania, Italy
| | | | - Alice Rossi
- Department of Oncology, University of Verona, Verona, Veneto, Italy
| | - Anna Russo
- Medical Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Giovanni Paolo II, Bari, Puglia, Italy
| | - Massimiliano Salati
- Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital Modena, Modena, Emilia Romagna, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Santabarbara
- Division of Medical Oncology, "San Giuseppe Moscati" Hospital, Avellino, Campania, Italy
| | - Andrea Sbrana
- Medical Oncology Unit, University of Pisa, Pisa, Toscana, Italy
| | - Ester Simeone
- Unit of Melanoma, Cancer Immunotherapy and Development Therapeutics, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, Napoli, Campania, Italy
| | | | - Massimiliano Spada
- Oncology Unit, Fondazione Istituto San Raffaele G Giglio di Cefalu, Cefalu, Sicilia, Italy
| | - Paolo Tarantino
- Division of Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milano, Lombardia, Italy
| | | | - Federica Tomei
- Oncology Unit, Ospedale Ferdinando Veneziale, Isernia, Molise, Italy
| | - Tortora Vincenzo
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Oncology Unit, Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, Napoli, Campania, Italy.,Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry "Scuola Medica Salernitana", Oncology Unit, University of Salerno, Baronissi, Campania, Italy
| | - Dario Trapani
- Division of Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milano, Lombardia, Italy
| | - Claudia Trojanello
- Unit of Melanoma, Cancer Immunotherapy and Development Therapeutics, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, Napoli, Campania, Italy
| | - Vito Vanella
- Unit of Melanoma, Cancer Immunotherapy and Development Therapeutics, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, Napoli, Campania, Italy
| | - Sabrina Vari
- Medical Oncology 1 Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Lazio, Italy
| | - Jole Ventriglia
- Oncology Division, ASL San Felice a Cancello, Caserta, Campania, Italy
| | - Maria Grazia Vitale
- Unit of Melanoma, Cancer Immunotherapy and Development Therapeutics, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, Napoli, Campania, Italy.,Department of Oncology, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Integrata del Friuli Centrale, Udine, Friuli Venezia Giulia, Italy
| | - Fabiana Vitiello
- U.O.C. Pneumologia Oncologica, Azienda Ospedaliera dei Colli, Monaldi Hospital, Naples, Campania, Italy
| | | | - Claudia von Arx
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College, London, UK
| | - Francesca Zacchi
- Oncology Unit, Università degli Studi di Verona, sede Borgo Roma, Verona, Veneto, Italy
| | - Ilaria Zampiva
- Oncology Unit, Università degli Studi di Verona, sede Borgo Roma, Verona, Veneto, Italy
| | - Andrea Zivi
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College, London, UK.,Medical Oncology Department, AOUI di Verona, Verona, Veneto, Italy
| | | | - Paolo Antonio Ascierto
- Unit of Melanoma, Cancer Immunotherapy and Development Therapeutics, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, Napoli, Campania, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Martin J, Petrillo A, Smyth EC, Shaida N, Khwaja S, Cheow HK, Duckworth A, Heister P, Praseedom R, Jah A, Balakrishnan A, Harper S, Liau S, Kosmoliaptsis V, Huguet E. Colorectal liver metastases: Current management and future perspectives. World J Clin Oncol 2020; 11:761-808. [PMID: 33200074 PMCID: PMC7643190 DOI: 10.5306/wjco.v11.i10.761] [Citation(s) in RCA: 86] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2020] [Revised: 05/14/2020] [Accepted: 08/31/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
The liver is the commonest site of metastatic disease for patients with colorectal cancer, with at least 25% developing colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) during the course of their illness. The management of CRLM has evolved into a complex field requiring input from experienced members of a multi-disciplinary team involving radiology (cross sectional, nuclear medicine and interventional), Oncology, Liver surgery, Colorectal surgery, and Histopathology. Patient management is based on assessment of sophisticated clinical, radiological and biomarker information. Despite incomplete evidence in this very heterogeneous patient group, maximising resection of CRLM using all available techniques remains a key objective and provides the best chance of long-term survival and cure. To this end, liver resection is maximised by the use of downsizing chemotherapy, optimisation of liver remnant by portal vein embolization, associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy, and combining resection with ablation, in the context of improvements in the functional assessment of the future remnant liver. Liver resection may safely be carried out laparoscopically or open, and synchronously with, or before, colorectal surgery in selected patients. For unresectable patients, treatment options including systemic chemotherapy, targeted biological agents, intra-arterial infusion or bead delivered chemotherapy, tumour ablation, stereotactic radiotherapy, and selective internal radiotherapy contribute to improve survival and may convert initially unresectable patients to operability. Currently evolving areas include biomarker characterisation of tumours, the development of novel systemic agents targeting specific oncogenic pathways, and the potential re-emergence of radical surgical options such as liver transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jack Martin
- Department of Surgery, Addenbrookes Hospital, NIHR Comprehensive Biomedical Research and Academic Health Sciences Centre, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
| | - Angelica Petrillo
- Department of Precision Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", Napoli 80131, Italy, & Medical Oncology Unit, Ospedale del Mare, 80147 Napoli Italy
| | - Elizabeth C Smyth
- Department of Oncology, Addenbrookes Hospital, NIHR Comprehensive Biomedical Research and Academic Health Sciences Centre, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
| | - Nadeem Shaida
- Department of Radiology, Addenbrookes Hospital, NIHR Comprehensive Biomedical Research and Academic Health Sciences Centre, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge CB22 0QQ, United Kingdom
| | - Samir Khwaja
- Department of Radiology, Addenbrookes Hospital, NIHR Comprehensive Biomedical Research and Academic Health Sciences Centre, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge CB22 0QQ, United Kingdom
| | - HK Cheow
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Addenbrookes Hospital, NIHR Comprehensive Biomedical Research and Academic Health Sciences Centre, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
| | - Adam Duckworth
- Department of Pathology, Addenbrookes Hospital, NIHR Comprehensive Biomedical Research and Academic Health Sciences Centre, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
| | - Paula Heister
- Department of Pathology, Addenbrookes Hospital, NIHR Comprehensive Biomedical Research and Academic Health Sciences Centre, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
| | - Raaj Praseedom
- Department of Surgery, Addenbrookes Hospital, NIHR Comprehensive Biomedical Research and Academic Health Sciences Centre, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
| | - Asif Jah
- Department of Surgery, Addenbrookes Hospital, NIHR Comprehensive Biomedical Research and Academic Health Sciences Centre, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
| | - Anita Balakrishnan
- Department of Surgery, Addenbrookes Hospital, NIHR Comprehensive Biomedical Research and Academic Health Sciences Centre, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
| | - Simon Harper
- Department of Surgery, Addenbrookes Hospital, NIHR Comprehensive Biomedical Research and Academic Health Sciences Centre, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
| | - Siong Liau
- Department of Surgery, Addenbrookes Hospital, NIHR Comprehensive Biomedical Research and Academic Health Sciences Centre, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
| | - Vasilis Kosmoliaptsis
- Department of Surgery, Addenbrookes Hospital, NIHR Comprehensive Biomedical Research and Academic Health Sciences Centre, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
| | - Emmanuel Huguet
- Department of Surgery, Addenbrookes Hospital, NIHR Comprehensive Biomedical Research and Academic Health Sciences Centre, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Federico P, Petrillo A, Giordano P, Bosso D, Fabbrocini A, Ottaviano M, Rosanova M, Silvestri A, Tufo A, Cozzolino A, Daniele B. Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Current Status and Novel Perspectives. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:E3025. [PMID: 33080958 PMCID: PMC7603151 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12103025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2020] [Revised: 10/13/2020] [Accepted: 10/15/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) represent a promising treatment for many kinds of cancers, including hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The rationale for using ICIs in HCC is based on the immunogenic background of hepatitis and cirrhosis and on the observation of high programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in this cancer. Promising data from phase I/II studies in advanced HCC, showing durable objective response rates (~20% in first- and second-line settings) and good safety profile, have led to phase III studies with ICIs as single agents or in combination therapy, both in first and second line setting. While the activity of immunotherapy agents as single agents seems to be limited to an "ill-defined" small subset of patients, the combination of the anti PD-L1 atezolizumab and anti-vascular endothelial growth factor bevacizumab revealed a benefit in the outcomes when compared to sorafenib in the first line. In addition, the activity and efficacy of the combinations between anti-PD-1/anti-PD-L1 antibody and other ICIs, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, or surgical and locoregional therapies, has also been investigated in clinical trials. In this review, we provide an overview of the role of ICIs in the management of HCC with a critical evaluation of the current status and future directions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Piera Federico
- Medical Oncology Unit, Ospedale del Mare, 80147 Napoli, Italy; (A.P.); (P.G.); (D.B.); (A.F.); (M.O.); (M.R.); (A.S.); (B.D.)
| | - Angelica Petrillo
- Medical Oncology Unit, Ospedale del Mare, 80147 Napoli, Italy; (A.P.); (P.G.); (D.B.); (A.F.); (M.O.); (M.R.); (A.S.); (B.D.)
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Precision Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Study of Campania “L. Vanvitelli”, 80131 Napoli, Italy
| | - Pasqualina Giordano
- Medical Oncology Unit, Ospedale del Mare, 80147 Napoli, Italy; (A.P.); (P.G.); (D.B.); (A.F.); (M.O.); (M.R.); (A.S.); (B.D.)
| | - Davide Bosso
- Medical Oncology Unit, Ospedale del Mare, 80147 Napoli, Italy; (A.P.); (P.G.); (D.B.); (A.F.); (M.O.); (M.R.); (A.S.); (B.D.)
| | - Antonietta Fabbrocini
- Medical Oncology Unit, Ospedale del Mare, 80147 Napoli, Italy; (A.P.); (P.G.); (D.B.); (A.F.); (M.O.); (M.R.); (A.S.); (B.D.)
| | - Margaret Ottaviano
- Medical Oncology Unit, Ospedale del Mare, 80147 Napoli, Italy; (A.P.); (P.G.); (D.B.); (A.F.); (M.O.); (M.R.); (A.S.); (B.D.)
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Mario Rosanova
- Medical Oncology Unit, Ospedale del Mare, 80147 Napoli, Italy; (A.P.); (P.G.); (D.B.); (A.F.); (M.O.); (M.R.); (A.S.); (B.D.)
| | - Antonia Silvestri
- Medical Oncology Unit, Ospedale del Mare, 80147 Napoli, Italy; (A.P.); (P.G.); (D.B.); (A.F.); (M.O.); (M.R.); (A.S.); (B.D.)
| | - Andrea Tufo
- Surgical Unit, Ospedale del Mare, 80147 Napoli, Italy;
| | | | - Bruno Daniele
- Medical Oncology Unit, Ospedale del Mare, 80147 Napoli, Italy; (A.P.); (P.G.); (D.B.); (A.F.); (M.O.); (M.R.); (A.S.); (B.D.)
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gastric cancer (GC) is one of the most lethal cancers worldwide. Although GC was historically considered a single entity within the organ of origin, nowadays it is acknowledged that GC represents a heterogeneous disease. Nevertheless, in this field there is still a lack of biomarkers able to guide the choice of the best treatment options for each patient. This review aims to summarize the prognostic and predictive biomarkers evaluated in GC and their role as a guide for treatment for precision medicine. SUMMARY Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 overexpression represents the only predictive molecular biomarker validated in GC, while its prognostic role is still controversial. Microsatellite instability and Epstein-Barr virus status are promising for prediction of the response to immunotherapy. The role of other biomarkers (ctDNA, programmed death ligand 1 [PD-L1], and TMB), as well as the practical application of molecular classifications, requires further evaluation before use in clinical practice. 18-FDG-PET scan could be useful as a predictive tool in non-metastatic GC patients receiving a perioperative approach. Finally, the tumor microenvironment may have an evolving role in the future. KEY MESSAGES GC is a heterogeneous disease and targeted approaches are needed. The finding of prognostic and predictive factors is a hot topic in the field of GC personalized medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angelica Petrillo
- Medical Oncology Unit, Ospedale del Mare, Naples, Italy
- University of Study of Campania L. Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy
| | - Elizabeth C. Smyth
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Surgery represents the only curative approach for resectable gastric cancer. However, rates of recurrence remain high. This review summarizes the state of the art and future perspectives regarding perioperative, neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy for localized gastric cancer with insights regarding precision medicine. RECENT FINDINGS Perioperative chemotherapy with FLOT has significantly improved outcomes for non-Asian patients with resectable gastric cancer, removing the role for anthracyclines. Preliminary results demonstrate that the perioperative approach is an option for Asian patients; however, long-term outcomes are awaited. For adjuvant treatment in Asian gastric cancer patients, S-1 as well as docetaxel may be a new treatment option. In this context, the right selection of patients is crucial. Among several biomarkers, microsatellite instability/mismatch repair deficiency has been linked with a lack of benefit from chemotherapy as well as better prognosis. SUMMARY Multimodality treatment represents the standard of care for resectable gastric cancer. Perioperative chemotherapy with FLOT is the standard treatment in western countries; in patients who are not suitable for triplet, a platinum-fluoropyrimidine doublet can be considered. In Asian countries, adjuvant chemotherapy based on fluoropyrimidine monotherapy or in association with oxaliplatin/docetaxel are options. Validation of prognostic and predictive biomarkers is needed in order to improve patient selection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angelica Petrillo
- Medical Oncology Unit, Ospedale del Mare
- University of Study of Campania 'Luigi Vanvitelli', Naples, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Tirino G, Petrillo A, Pompella L, Pappalardo A, Laterza MM, Panarese I, Sabetta R, Franco R, Galizia G, Ciardiello F, De Vita F. Durable Complete Radiological Response to Nivolumab in Two Heavily Pretreated Western Elderly Patients With Metastatic Gastric Cancer: A Case Report. Front Oncol 2020; 10:130. [PMID: 32128313 PMCID: PMC7039182 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.00130] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2019] [Accepted: 01/24/2020] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: The prognosis of patients with advanced gastric cancer remains overall poor despite some recent innovations and the development of new therapeutic approaches. Current European guidelines do not recommend any specific treatment for patients with advanced gastric cancer refractory to two or more previous chemotherapy regimens, making this setting "orphan." Immunotherapy is quickly evolving also for this malignancy even if with controversial results and the correct patient selection is still debated, especially for Western patients. The phase III ONO-4538-12 "ATTRACTION-2" represents the current landmark trial for the development of immunotherapy for pretreated Asian patients and led to the approval of Nivolumab in some Asian countries, while only previous phase trials are available for Caucasians. Complete radiological response is anecdotic and has never been described both in the pivotal trial both in the others with Western patients enrolled. Case presentation: We report two cases of heavily pretreated Western elderly patients with metastatic gastric cancer who experienced durable complete radiological response to Nivolumab "off label" (more than 20 months to date) in a clinical practice context. Molecular analysis of potential predictive factors has been performed (PD-L1, EBV, MSI, and TMB) on primary tumor sample. Conclusions: Despite the lack of evidence for Western patients and the controversial outcome with the use of checkpoint inhibitors in previous settings, immunotherapy may dramatically change the prognosis and the natural history of pretreated Western metastatic gastric cancer, in a correctly selected population. Microsatellite instability and tumor mutational burden may be reliable predictive factors also for Caucasians. There is an urgent need for a change in clinical practice also for this "orphan" patients and more efforts are needed in order to clarify the role of predictive factors for a correct patient selection and better chances of survival for this awful malignancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe Tirino
- Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy
| | - Angelica Petrillo
- Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy
| | - Luca Pompella
- Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy
| | - Annalisa Pappalardo
- Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy
| | | | - Iacopo Panarese
- Dipartimento di Salute Mentale e Fisica e Medicina Preventiva, Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy
| | - Rosalaura Sabetta
- Dipartimento di Salute Mentale e Fisica e Medicina Preventiva, Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy
| | - Renato Franco
- Dipartimento di Salute Mentale e Fisica e Medicina Preventiva, Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy
| | - Gennaro Galizia
- Department of Translational Medical Sciences, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy
| | - Fortunato Ciardiello
- Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy
| | - Ferdinando De Vita
- Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Giommoni E, De Vita F, Pecora I, Iachetta F, Strippoli A, Satolli MA, Spallanzani A, Puzzoni M, Stragliotto S, Sisani M, Formica V, Giovanardi F, Pozzo C, Prisciandaro M, Di Donato S, Petrillo A, Catanese S, Tirino G, Lavacchi D, Antonuzzo L. Perioperative FLOT in resectable gastric cancer: Italian real-world data from the RealFLOT study. J Clin Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2020.38.4_suppl.300] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
300 Background: Perioperative treatments have significantly improved survival in patients with resectable gastric cancer, increasing 5-year overall survival from 23% with surgery alone to 45% with FLOT (fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, docetaxel). Pathological regression is a prognostic marker of better survival. Methods: In this observational, retro- and prospective study we collected data from patients with resectable gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma treated, as clinical practice, with perioperative FLOT. All patients had clinical T2 or higher and/or nodal involvement, according to FLOT4-AIO trial. Results: A total of 206 patients received perioperative chemotherapy with FLOT at 15 Italian centres, between September 2016 and September 2019. Overall, 186 (90.3%) patients completed the preoperative phase, 190 (92%) underwent surgery, and 142 (68.9%) started the postoperative phase. Among patients who started the postoperative phase, 105 (51.0%) received FLOT, while 37 (18%) received less intensive regimens (e.g. FOLFOX or De Gramont), depending on performance status after surgery or toxicity in the preoperative phase. Pathological complete response (pCR) was obtained in 7.3% of cases. In the preoperative phase, grade (G) 3-4 hematological and gastrointestinal adverse events (AEs) were reported in 42 (20.4%) and 13 (6.3%) patients, respectively. Conclusions: These real data confirmed the feasibility of perioperative FLOT in a less-selected population, representative of the clinical practice. The pCR rate was lower than in the FLOT4-AIO trial. The survival outcomes, potential predictive or prognostic factors and comprehensive safety data will be included in the final analysis. [Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elisa Giommoni
- Medical Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Ferdinando De Vita
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Precision Medicine, University of Study of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy
| | - Irene Pecora
- Medical Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy
| | - Francesco Iachetta
- Medical Oncology Unit, Clinical Cancer Center, AUSL-IRCCS, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Antonia Strippoli
- Medical Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli”, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | | | | | - Marco Puzzoni
- Medical Oncology Department, University Hospital, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Silvia Stragliotto
- Oncology Unit - Dipartimento di Oncologia Clinica e Sperimentale Istituto Oncologico Veneto IOV-IRCCS, Padua, Italy
| | | | - Vincenzo Formica
- Internal Medicine Department "Tor Vergata" University Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Filippo Giovanardi
- Medical Oncology, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Carmelo Pozzo
- Medical Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli”, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Michele Prisciandaro
- Medical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Samantha Di Donato
- Medical Oncology, Department Nuovo Ospedale-Santo Stefano Instituto Toscano Tumori, Prato, Italy
| | - Angelica Petrillo
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Precision Medicine, University of Study of Campania “L. Vanvitelli”, Naples, Italy
| | - Silvia Catanese
- Medical Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Tirino
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Precision Medicine, University of Study of Campania “L. Vanvitelli”, Naples, Italy
| | - Daniele Lavacchi
- Medical Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Antonuzzo
- Medical Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Petrillo A, Tirino G, Zito Marino F, Pompella L, Sabetta R, Panarese I, Pappalardo A, Caterino M, Ventriglia A, Laterza MM, Morgillo F, Orditura M, Ciardiello F, Franco R, De Vita F. Nivolumab in Heavily Pretreated Metastatic Gastric Cancer Patients: Real-Life Data from a Western Population. Onco Targets Ther 2020; 13:867-876. [PMID: 32099391 PMCID: PMC6996223 DOI: 10.2147/ott.s229813] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2019] [Accepted: 01/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE ATTRACTION-2 trial assessed the role of Nivolumab as a new standard treatment for Asian patients with pretreated metastatic gastric cancer (mGC). The aim of this analysis was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Nivolumab in a real-life Western population, considering the lack of evidence to date. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients progressed after ≥2 chemotherapy regimens and able to receive Nivolumab (3 mg/kg q14) were eligible for the analysis. RESULTS 16 patients received Nivolumab as third (81.3%) or fourth line (18.7%) from September 2017 to July 2019. The safety was in line with the literature and only one patient discontinued treatment due to persistent hematological toxicity. Overall response rate and disease control rate were 18.7% and 31.2%, respectively. Median duration of response was 5 months. With a median follow-up of 21 months, median OS was 6 months (7, 21 and 22 months in the responders) and median PFS 3 months. PD-L1 and microsatellite status were retrospectively collected in 12 patients. All the major responders were MSI, although no statistically significant difference in OS or PFS was observed according to molecular analysis. CONCLUSION Nivolumab is feasible and effective in Western patients with mGC. Further investigation is urgently needed also in non-Asians.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angelica Petrillo
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Precision Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Study of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Naples80131, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Tirino
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Precision Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Study of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Naples80131, Italy
| | - Federica Zito Marino
- Pathology Unit, University of Study of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Naples80138, Italy
| | - Luca Pompella
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Precision Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Study of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Naples80131, Italy
| | - Rosalaura Sabetta
- Pathology Unit, University of Study of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Naples80138, Italy
| | - Iacopo Panarese
- Pathology Unit, University of Study of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Naples80138, Italy
| | - Annalisa Pappalardo
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Precision Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Study of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Naples80131, Italy
| | - Marianna Caterino
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Precision Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Study of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Naples80131, Italy
| | - Anna Ventriglia
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Precision Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Study of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Naples80131, Italy
| | - Maria Maddalena Laterza
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Precision Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Study of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Naples80131, Italy
| | - Floriana Morgillo
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Precision Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Study of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Naples80131, Italy
| | - Michele Orditura
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Precision Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Study of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Naples80131, Italy
| | - Fortunato Ciardiello
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Precision Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Study of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Naples80131, Italy
| | - Renato Franco
- Pathology Unit, University of Study of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Naples80138, Italy
| | - Ferdinando De Vita
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Precision Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Study of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Naples80131, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
|
44
|
Altuna S, Trapani D, Lengyel C, Habeeb B, Hussain S, Mazher S, Elfaham E, Petrillo A, El Bairi K, Khan S. Accessibility and affordability to trastuzumab for breast cancer patients: Voices of the global oncology community from ONCOLLEGE 001 survey, part 2. Ann Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdz263.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
45
|
Petrillo A, Pappalardo A, Calabrese F, Tirino G, Pompella L, Ventriglia J, Laterza MM, Caterino M, Sforza V, Iranzo V, Biglietto M, Orditura M, Ciardiello F, Conzo G, Molino C, De Vita F. First line nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine in elderly metastatic pancreatic patients: a good choice beyond age. J Gastrointest Oncol 2019; 10:910-917. [PMID: 31602329 DOI: 10.21037/jgo.2019.06.02] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine represents one of the standard regimens for first line treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPC). Few data are available on nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine in geriatric population. Our study aims to show whether this schedule can be feasible in the elderly as first-line treatment for mPC. Methods We retrospectively analyzed the data of 64 mPC patients (≥65 years old) treated according to the MPACT schedule. Results Median age was 69.5 years (range, 65-80 years); after a median of 5 cycles administered (range, 1-12), the most common adverse events (AEs) were grade 2 alopecia (46.9%), anemia (17.2%) and hypertransaminasemia (10.9%); all grades neutropenia occurred in 20.3% of pts. Global incidence of grade 3 and 4 toxicities were 26.5% and 0%, respectively, and no patients stopped treatment due to unacceptable toxicity. Stable disease (SD) was observed in 31.2% of patients, with a disease control rate (DCR) and overall response rate of 57.8% and 26.6%, respectively. After a median follow-up of 18 months, median progression free survival (PFS) was 8 months (95% CI: 6.3-9.6) and median OS was 12.0 months (95% CI: 8.4-15.6). The univariate analysis for overall survival (OS) showed that only ECOG performance status was an independent prognostic factor for survival. Conclusions Nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine schedule is feasible and effective in the "daily clinical practice" geriatric population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angelica Petrillo
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Precision Medicine, University of study of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", Napoli, Italy
| | - Annalisa Pappalardo
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Precision Medicine, University of study of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", Napoli, Italy
| | | | - Giuseppe Tirino
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Precision Medicine, University of study of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", Napoli, Italy
| | - Luca Pompella
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Precision Medicine, University of study of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", Napoli, Italy
| | - Jole Ventriglia
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Precision Medicine, University of study of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", Napoli, Italy
| | - Maria Maddalena Laterza
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Precision Medicine, University of study of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", Napoli, Italy
| | - Marianna Caterino
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Precision Medicine, University of study of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", Napoli, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Sforza
- Medical Oncology Department, Consorcio Hospital General Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Vega Iranzo
- Medical Oncology Department, Consorcio Hospital General Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Maria Biglietto
- Division of Medical Oncology, AORN, "A Cardarelli", Napoli, Italy
| | - Michele Orditura
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Precision Medicine, University of study of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", Napoli, Italy
| | - Fortunato Ciardiello
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Precision Medicine, University of study of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", Napoli, Italy
| | - Giovanni Conzo
- Department of Cardiothoracic Sciences, University of study of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy
| | - Carlo Molino
- Division of General Surgery, AORN, "A. Cardarelli", Napoli, Italy
| | - Ferdinando De Vita
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Precision Medicine, University of study of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", Napoli, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Petrillo A, Pappalardo A, Pompella L, Tirino G, Calabrese F, Laterza MM, Caterino M, Ventriglia A, Orditura M, Conzo G, Molino C, Ciardiello F, Biglietto M, De Vita F. Nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine as first line therapy in metastatic pancreatic cancer patients relapsed after gemcitabine adjuvant treatment. Med Oncol 2019; 36:83. [PMID: 31444639 DOI: 10.1007/s12032-019-1306-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2019] [Accepted: 08/15/2019] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
Nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine (Nab-Gem) represents one of the standard regimen for first-line treatment of metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (mPDAC). However, few data are available in mPDAC relapsed after gemcitabine as adjuvant treatment. Our study aims to evaluate the efficacy and feasibility of Nab-Gem as first-line treatment for mPDAC patients previously treated with adjuvant treatment. We retrospectively analyzed the safety and efficacy data of 36 patients, who received first-line Nab-Gem after gemcitabine as adjuvant treatment. All patients received gemcitabine after radical surgery. Median disease-free survival was 12 months (95% CI 9.7-14.3); at relapse, all patients received Nab-Gem. We observed an objective response rate and disease control rate of 11.1% and 63.9%, respectively. With a median follow-up of 47 months, median progression-free survival was 5 months (95% CI 1.0-9.0), whereas median overall survival (OS) was 13 months (95% CI 5.5-20.5). Median OS was higher in patients with a relapse ≥ 7 months after the end of adjuvant treatment than in patients relapsed < 7 months (14 vs. 8 months, respectively, p: 0.52). Our results show that first-line Nab-Gem is feasible and effective in patients previously treated with gemcitabine as adjuvant treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angelica Petrillo
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Precision Medicine, University of Study of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", via Pansini n.5, 80131, Naples, Italy.
| | - Annalisa Pappalardo
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Precision Medicine, University of Study of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", via Pansini n.5, 80131, Naples, Italy
| | - Luca Pompella
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Precision Medicine, University of Study of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", via Pansini n.5, 80131, Naples, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Tirino
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Precision Medicine, University of Study of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", via Pansini n.5, 80131, Naples, Italy
| | | | - Maria Maddalena Laterza
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Precision Medicine, University of Study of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", via Pansini n.5, 80131, Naples, Italy
| | - Marianna Caterino
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Precision Medicine, University of Study of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", via Pansini n.5, 80131, Naples, Italy
| | - Anna Ventriglia
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Precision Medicine, University of Study of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", via Pansini n.5, 80131, Naples, Italy
| | - Michele Orditura
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Precision Medicine, University of Study of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", via Pansini n.5, 80131, Naples, Italy
| | - Giovanni Conzo
- Department of Cardiothoracic Sciences, University of Study of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", Via Sergio Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy
| | - Carlo Molino
- Department of Oncological Surgery, A.O.R.N. "A. Cardarelli", Naples, Italy
| | - Fortunato Ciardiello
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Precision Medicine, University of Study of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", via Pansini n.5, 80131, Naples, Italy
| | - Maria Biglietto
- Division of Medical Oncology, AORN, "A Cardarelli", Naples, Italy
| | - Ferdinando De Vita
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Precision Medicine, University of Study of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", via Pansini n.5, 80131, Naples, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Grillo A, Capasso R, Petrillo A, De Vita F, Conforti R. An intramedullary "flame" recognized as being an intramedullary spinal cord metastasis from esophageal cancer. J Radiol Case Rep 2019; 13:14-20. [PMID: 31558963 DOI: 10.3941/jrcr.v13i7.3555] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Intramedullary spinal cord metastases are rarely encountered in patients suffering from extra - central nervous system primary cancer, with only 2 described cases reported in the literature deriving from esophageal cancer. Intramedullary spinal cord metastases may occur at any level of the spinal cord but cervical location is the most frequent. We report the first case of intramedullary metastasis affecting the thoracic spinal cord from esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in a 35-year-old patient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Assunta Grillo
- Department of Radiology & Radiotherapy, Department of Internal & Experimental Medicine 'F Magrassi', University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy
| | - Raffaella Capasso
- Department of Medicine and Health Science "V. Tiberio", University of Molise, Campobasso, Italy
- Neuroradiology Service, Department of Radiology, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy
| | - Angelica Petrillo
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Precision Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy
| | - Ferdinando De Vita
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Precision Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy
| | - Renata Conforti
- Neuroradiology Service, Department of Radiology, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Zoppoli P, Calice G, Laurino S, Ruggieri V, La Rocca F, La Torre G, Ciuffi M, Amendola E, De Vita F, Petrillo A, Napolitano G, Falco G, Russi S. TRPV2 Calcium Channel Gene Expression and Outcomes in Gastric Cancer Patients: A Clinically Relevant Association. J Clin Med 2019; 8:E662. [PMID: 31083561 PMCID: PMC6572141 DOI: 10.3390/jcm8050662] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2019] [Revised: 05/07/2019] [Accepted: 05/08/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Gastric cancer (GC) is characterized by poor efficacy and the modest clinical impact of current therapies. Apoptosis evasion represents a causative factor for treatment failure in GC as in other cancers. Since intracellular calcium homeostasis regulation has been found to be associated with apoptosis resistance, the aberrant expression of intracellular calcium regulator genes (CaRGs) could have a prognostic value in GC patients. We analyzed the association of the expression levels of 98 CaRGs with prognosis by the log-rank test in a collection of 1524 GC samples from four gene expression profiling datasets. We also evaluated differential gene expression in comparison with normal stomach tissue, and then we crossed results with tissue microarrays from the Human Protein Atlas. Among the investigated CaRGs, patients with high levels of TRPV2 expression were characterized by a shorter overall survival. TRPV2 expression was found to increase according to tumor stage. Both mRNA and protein levels were significantly higher in tumor than normal stomach samples. TRPV2 was also associated with poor prognosis in the Lauren's intestinal type GC and in patients treated with adjuvant therapy. Overall, we highlighted the relevance of TRPV2 not only as a prognostic biomarker but also as a potential therapeutic target to improve GC treatment efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pietro Zoppoli
- Laboratory of Preclinical and Translational Research, IRCCS-Referral Cancer Center of Basilicata (CROB), 85028 Rionero in Vulture (PZ), Italy.
| | - Giovanni Calice
- Laboratory of Preclinical and Translational Research, IRCCS-Referral Cancer Center of Basilicata (CROB), 85028 Rionero in Vulture (PZ), Italy.
| | - Simona Laurino
- Laboratory of Preclinical and Translational Research, IRCCS-Referral Cancer Center of Basilicata (CROB), 85028 Rionero in Vulture (PZ), Italy.
| | - Vitalba Ruggieri
- Laboratory of Preclinical and Translational Research, IRCCS-Referral Cancer Center of Basilicata (CROB), 85028 Rionero in Vulture (PZ), Italy.
| | - Francesco La Rocca
- Laboratory of Preclinical and Translational Research, IRCCS-Referral Cancer Center of Basilicata (CROB), 85028 Rionero in Vulture (PZ), Italy.
| | - Giuseppe La Torre
- Laboratory of Preclinical and Translational Research, IRCCS-Referral Cancer Center of Basilicata (CROB), 85028 Rionero in Vulture (PZ), Italy.
| | - Mario Ciuffi
- Laboratory of Preclinical and Translational Research, IRCCS-Referral Cancer Center of Basilicata (CROB), 85028 Rionero in Vulture (PZ), Italy.
| | - Elena Amendola
- Department of Biology, University of Naples Federico II, 80138 Naples, Italy.
| | - Ferdinando De Vita
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Precision Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Study of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", 80138 Naples, Italy.
| | - Angelica Petrillo
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Precision Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Study of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", 80138 Naples, Italy.
| | - Giuliana Napolitano
- Department of Biology, University of Naples Federico II, 80138 Naples, Italy.
| | - Geppino Falco
- Department of Biology, University of Naples Federico II, 80138 Naples, Italy.
- Biogem, Istituto di Biologia e Genetica Molecolare, Via Camporeale, 83031 Ariano Irpino (AV), Italy.
| | - Sabino Russi
- Laboratory of Preclinical and Translational Research, IRCCS-Referral Cancer Center of Basilicata (CROB), 85028 Rionero in Vulture (PZ), Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Altuna S, Lengyel C, Trapani D, Elfaham E, Hussain S, Petrillo A, El Bairi K, Mazher S, Habeeb B, Khan S. Painting the global picture of HER2-testing for breast cancer. The ONCOLLEGE-001 survey study. Ann Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdz095.041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
50
|
Petrillo A, Laterza MM, Tirino G, Pompella L, Pappalardo A, Ventriglia J, Savastano B, Auricchio A, Orditura M, Ciardiello F, Galizia G, De Vita F. Increased circulating levels of vascular endothelial growth factor C can predict outcome in resectable gastric cancer patients. J Gastrointest Oncol 2019; 10:314-323. [PMID: 31032100 DOI: 10.21037/jgo.2018.12.06] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Neoangiogenesis has proven to be a relevant pathogenetic mechanism in gastric cancer (GC) and lymphatic spread represents an important well-known prognostic factor. Vascular endothelial growth factor C (VEGF-C) plays a key role in lymphangiogenesis and its blood levels in GC patients are easily measurable. This analysis aimed to investigate the prognostic role of preoperative VEGF-C blood levels. Methods VEGF-C serum levels were determined by enzyme-linked immunoadsorbent assay (ELISA) in 186 patients observed at our institution from January 2004 until December 2009 and 82 healthy subjects. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 21.0. Results VEGF-C levels were significantly higher in GC patients (median: 287.4 pg/mL; range, 76.2-865.2 pg/mL) than in the control group (median VEGF-C: 31 pg/mL; range, 12-97 pg/mL). A significant correlation between VEGF-C levels, T, N and tumor stage has been described. The median overall survival (OS) was statistically significantly higher in pts with low serum VEGF-C levels [median: not reached (NR) vs. 26 months; P<0.0001]. Higher preoperative VEGF-C levels correlated also with earlier disease relapse and poor disease-free survival (DFS) (median NR in each subgroup, P=0.005). Furthermore, high VEGF-C levels [hazard ratio (HR) =2.7; P=0.018] and tumor grading (HR =0.44; P=0.007) were independent prognostic factors for OS at multivariate analysis. Conclusions Our study showed that increased VEGF-C levels are significantly associated with advanced regional lymph node involvement and poor OS and DFS in pts with resected GC paving the way to a possible application as prognostic factor in the clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angelica Petrillo
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Precision Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy
| | - Maria Maddalena Laterza
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Precision Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Tirino
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Precision Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy
| | - Luca Pompella
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Precision Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy
| | - Annalisa Pappalardo
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Precision Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy
| | - Jole Ventriglia
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Precision Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy
| | - Beatrice Savastano
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Precision Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy
| | - Annamaria Auricchio
- Division of GI Tract Surgical Oncology, Department of Cardio-Thoracic and Respiratory Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy
| | - Michele Orditura
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Precision Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy
| | - Fortunato Ciardiello
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Precision Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy
| | - Gennaro Galizia
- Division of GI Tract Surgical Oncology, Department of Cardio-Thoracic and Respiratory Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy
| | - Ferdinando De Vita
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Precision Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|