Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab versus lenvatinib or sorafenib in non-viral unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: an international propensity score matching analysis

BACKGROUND

A growing body of evidence suggests that non-viral hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) might benefit less from immunotherapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We carried out a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from consecutive patients with non-viral advanced HCC, treated with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab, lenvatinib, or sorafenib, in 36 centers in 4 countries (Italy, Japan, Republic of Korea, and UK). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab versus lenvatinib. Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab versus lenvatinib, and OS and PFS with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab versus sorafenib. For the primary and secondary endpoints, we carried out the analysis on the whole population first, and then we divided the cohort into two groups: non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD)/non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) population and non-NAFLD/NASH population.

RESULTS

One hundred and ninety patients received atezolizumab plus bevacizumab, 569 patients received lenvatinib, and 210 patients received sorafenib. In the whole population, multivariate analysis showed that treatment with lenvatinib was associated with a longer OS [hazard ratio (HR) 0.65; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.44-0.95; P = 0.0268] and PFS (HR 0.67; 95% CI 0.51-0.86; P = 0.002) compared to atezolizumab plus bevacizumab. In the NAFLD/NASH population, multivariate analysis confirmed that lenvatinib treatment was associated with a longer OS (HR 0.46; 95% CI 0.26-0.84; P = 0.0110) and PFS (HR 0.55; 95% CI 0.38-0.82; P = 0.031) compared to atezolizumab plus bevacizumab. In the subgroup of non-NAFLD/NASH patients, no difference in OS or PFS was observed between patients treated with lenvatinib and those treated with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab. All these results were confirmed following propensity score matching analysis. By comparing patients receiving atezolizumab plus bevacizumab versus sorafenib, no statistically significant difference in survival was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The present analysis conducted on a large number of advanced non-viral HCC patients showed for the first time that treatment with lenvatinib is associated with a significant survival benefit compared to atezolizumab plus bevacizumab, in particular in patients with NAFLD/NASH-related HCC.

Clinicians' Attitude to Doublet Plus Anti-EGFR Versus Triplet Plus Bevacizumab as First-line Treatment in Left-Sided RAS and BRAF Wild-Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients: A Multicenter, "Real-Life", Case-Control Study

BACKGROUND

Doublets plus antiepidermal growth factor receptors monoclonal antibodies (EGFRi) are widely considered the preferable first-line regimen in patients with left-sided RAS/BRAF wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), resulting superior in terms of activity and efficacy compared to doublets plus bevacizumab. However, data comparing doublet plus EGFRi and triplet plus bevacizumab are lacking, and the relative benefit of an intensive regimen plus an antiangiogenic backbone in this population is debated.

METHODS

This multicenter, retrospective study aimed at evaluating clinicians' attitude to triplet-bevacizumab and doublet-EGFRi as first-line regimen in patients with left-sided RAS/BRAF wild-type mCRC treated in clinical practice at 22 Oncology Units from March 2012 to October 2020. A random case-control matching was performed to compare activity (ORR), and effectiveness (PFS, OS, secondary resection rate of metastases with curative intent) between triplet-bevacizumab and doublet-EGFRi, on the basis of ECOG-PS, age, gender, and burden of disease.

RESULTS

A total of 718 patients were consecutively treated with doublet-EGFRi (686, 95.5%) or triplet-bevacizumab (32, 4.5%). After case-control matching, median PFS was 13.6 (95% CI, 8.9-31.7) and 16.1 (95% CI, 12.1-36.8) months (P= .621), while median OS was 30.2 (95% CI, 14.4-69.5) and 38.1 (95% CI, 33.1-101.1) months (P= .0283) in the doublet-EGFRi and the triplet-bevacizumab cohort, respectively. The ORR was 65.6% and 90.6% (P= .016), while the secondary resection rate was 18.8% and 46.9% (P= .016), in the doublet-EGFRi and the triplet-bevacizumab cohort, respectively. Triplet-bevacizumab was associated with a higher incidence of G3/G4 neutropenia (25.0% vs. 12.5%, P= .041).

CONCLUSION

Although a doublet-EGFRi remains the recommended upfront regimen in patients with left-sided RAS and BRAF wild-type mCRC, our real life data suggest a triplet-bevacizumab might be at least equally active and effective in properly selected cases.

AB0317 ADHERENCE TO MEDITERRANEAN DIET AND NUTRITIONAL STATE IN ITALIAN WOMEN WITH ISOLATED SJÖGREN’S SYNDROME

Background:

The Mediterranean Diet (MD) has anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory effects1,2 suggesting a protective role in rheumatic diseases. There is limited knowledge about the eating habits and the nutritional state in patients with isolated Sjögren Syndrome (SS) living within the Mediterranean area.

Objectives:

assessment of adherence to the MD and analysis of the nutritional state in women with SS and their correlations with the clinical, laboratory and histological data of the disease.

Methods:

patients classified as isolated SS according to AECG criteria 20023 who had undergone to minor salivary gland biopsy during the previous twelve months were consecutively enrolled during follow-up visits. The adherence to the MD was assessed by the Med Diet (MDiet)4 which includes eleven groups of foods; to each group is assigned a value ranging between 0 and 5 based on the frequency of monthly intake. The total score spans from 0 (poor adherence) to 55 (maximum adherence). The level of physical activity was measured by the 6-minutes walking test (6MWT) and by the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ). Systemic disease activity was evaluated with the EULAR SS disease activity index (ESSDAI); EULAR SS patient-reported index (ESSPRI) was calculated as well. A subgroup of patients was asked to fill a daily food diary processed with FOOD CONS software which allows to study in detail their eating habits. Nutritional state, muscle strength and basal metabolic rate were assessed. Alcoholism or drug abuse, diabetes mellitus, specific dietary models, treatment with drugs and/or food supplements with anti-inflammatory and/or antioxidant activity were considered exclusion criteria. Multivariate linear regression was performed with R project for Statistical Computing.

Results:

N= 40 N= 26Age, median (range) 53 (25-80) 33 (25-71)BMI, median (range) 21 (19-29.3) 25.1 (19-33.7)MedDiet score, median (range) 33 (26-43) 33 (23-40)ESSDAI, median (range) 2 (0-16) 1 (0-16)ESSPRI, median (range) 6 (0-8.6) 5.3 (1.6-9)ESSPRI dryness, median (range) 6 (0-10) 6 (2-10)Focus score, median (range) 2.5 (0-9.6) 1.7 (0.8-6.24)ASM kg, median (range) - 16.8 (13.3-21.7)IPAQ meters, median (range) - 1386 (99-11865)6MWT meters, median (range) - 595 (536-680)

BMI, body mass index; ASM appendicular skeletal mass; IPAQ International Physical Activity Questionnaire; 6MWT, six minute walking test.

MDiet was administered to 40 female SS outpatients. Even if not reaching significativity, patients with a higher focus score in their MSG have a lower value of MDiet score (p = 0.058, r = -1.00). The MDiet score is not associated with ESSDAI (p = 0.85, r 0.02), but only with lower serum levels of C3 (p = 0.004, r = - 0.08).

In 26 patients, daily food questionnaire shows that their diet consists of 43% of carbohydrates while fats represent 40% of total energy intake, the remaining 17% daily energy comes from proteins. Fat consumption is higher compared to the levels of energy and nutrient intake for the Italian population5. Six patients had a reduction in muscle mass; sarcopenia is not associated to ESSDAI (p = 0.610).The MDiet score and the amount eaten of polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) were reduced in patients with high value of subscale dryness of ESSPRI (p = 0.057, r -1.21; p =0.610, r -1.00).

Conclusion:

This study highlights a lower degree of glandular lymphocytic infiltration (expressed as focus score) in minor salivary glands in patients following MD, so its anti-inflammatory role of seems to be confirmed. SS patients have an unbalanced diet because of a higher intake of fat foods, likely for their lubricating effect. Despite the absence of correlation with objective parameters, the increased dryness in patients with a reduced intake of PUFA arouses our interest in a future study including omega-3 supplementation.

References:

[1]Schwingshackl L et al., Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis 2014

[2]Mena MP et al., Am J Clin Nutr. 2009

[3]Vitali C et al, ARD 2002

[4]Panagiotakos D et al., J Med Food 2007

[5]LARN 2014

Disclosure of Interests:

None declared