Sequencing of Ipilimumab Plus Nivolumab and Encorafenib Plus Binimetinib for Untreated BRAF-Mutated Metastatic Melanoma (SECOMBIT): A Randomized, Three-Arm, Open-Label Phase II Trial

PURPOSE

Limited prospective data are available on sequential immunotherapy and BRAF/MEK inhibition for BRAFV600-mutant metastatic melanoma.

METHODS

SECOMBIT is a randomized, three-arm, noncomparative phase II trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02631447). Patients with untreated, metastatic BRAFV600-mutant melanoma from 37 sites in nine countries were randomly assigned to arm A (encorafenib [450 mg orally once daily] plus binimetinib [45 mg orally twice daily] until progressive disease [PD] -> ipilimumab plus nivolumab [ipilimumab 3 mg/kg once every 3 weeks and nivolumab 1 mg/kg once every 3 weeks × four cycles -> nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks]), arm B [ipilimumab plus nivolumab until PD -> encorafenib plus binimetinib], or arm C (encorafenib plus binimetinib for 8 weeks -> ipilimumab plus nivolumab until PD -> encorafenib plus binimetinib). The primary end point was overall survival (OS) at 2 years. Secondary end points included total progression-free survival, 3-year OS, best overall response rate, duration of response, and biomarkers in the intent-to-treat population. Safety was analyzed throughout sequential treatment in all participants who received at least one dose of study medication.

RESULTS

A total of 209 patients were randomly assigned (69 in arm A, 71 in arm B, and 69 in arm C). At a median follow-up of 32.2 (interquartile range, 27.9-41.6) months, median OS was not reached in any arm and more than 30 patients were alive in all arms. Assuming a null hypothesis of median OS of ≤ 15 months, the OS end point was met for all arms. The 2-year and 3-year OS rates were 65% (95% CI, 54 to 76) and 54% (95% CI, 41 to 67) in arm A, 73% (95% CI, 62 to 84) and 62% (95% CI, 48 to 76) in arm B, and 69% (95% CI, 59 to 80) and 60% (95% CI, 58 to 72) in arm C. No new safety signals emerged.

CONCLUSION

Sequential immunotherapy and targeted therapy provide clinically meaningful survival benefits for patients with BRAFV600-mutant melanoma.

934 Biological mechanisms in the different etiologies of Merkel cell carcinoma patients: polyomavirus or UV exposure

Background

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare and aggressive skin cancer with neuroendocrine features, and it is associated with elevated mortality. The pathogenesis is associated with presence of clonally integrated Merkel cell polyomavirus (MCPyV) or ultraviolet light (UV) exposure.1 The MCPyV causes up to 80% of MCC tumors in North America and Europe.2–4 Recently immunotherapy is having good results,5 the phase 2 trial JAVELIN Merkel 200 indicated that treatment with Avelumab (PDL1 inhibitor) in patients with metastatic MCC pre-treated have a meaningful long-term survival outcomes respect chemotherapy. Moreover, ORRs were highest in patients with high TMB that were also MCPyV−, PD-L1+ or had a greater CD8+ T cell density at the invasive margin.6 In this study, we investigated the biological signatures in patients with MCPyV or not.

Methods

From April 2011 to June 2018, we collected retrospectively 50 FFPE (Formalin-Fixed Paraffin-Embed) from 37 patients with metastatic MCC and 13 tissues from a secondary metastatic site. All patients have appropriately signed informed consent. We performed an immunohistochemistry assays (IHC) for MCPyV and PDL1. In addition, through the NanoString GeoMx DSP (Digital Spatial Profiling), we analysed 11 patients (6 MCPyV+; 5 MCPyV-) with cutaneous metastasis using a 44-plex antibody cocktail. For each slide we selected three different areas: Intratumoral, extratumoral and tumour border, in each area we selected CD4+ and CD8+ cells in 4 different ROIs (Region of Interest). Statistical analysis was performed via Bonferroni correction, P< 0.05 was considered statistically significant for median stratification.

Results

The DSP analysis showed that the tumour border cells have an overexpression of IDO respect intratumoral area (adj. p<0.01). Instead, extratumoral area of MCPyV- patients have a higher expression of B7-H3 respect MCPyV+ as well as FOXP3 is higher in the tumour border of MCPyV+ patients and EpCAM in the intratumoral area (p<0.05). PDL1 is overexpressed in MCPyV+ CD4+ cells respect CD8+ (p<0.05). The IHC assay shown that viral status does not change in multiple metastases and PDL1 is elevated in the tumour border (p<0.05).

Conclusions

In this retrospective study, our preliminary data shown that tumour edge have an important role in the modulations of immune infiltrate and patients with Merkel cell polyomavirus could have a different pathway of immunosuppression compared to patients with non-virus related etiology. Further investigations are needed to get additional information.

Acknowledgements

The study was supported by the Institutional Project ”Ricerca Corrente” of Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione ”G. Pascale” of Napoli, Italy.

References

Kaae J, Hansen AV, Biggar RJ, et al. Merkel cell carcinoma: incidence, mortality, and risk of other cancers. J Natl Cancer Inst 2010 June 2;102(11):793–801.

Feng H, Shuda M, Chang Y, et al. Clonal integration of a polyomavirus in human Merkel cell carcinoma. Science 2008 February 22;319(5866):1096–100.

Garneski KM, Warcola AH, Feng Q, et al. Merkel cell polyomavirus is more frequently present in North American than Australian Merkel cell carcinoma tumors. J Invest Dermatol 2009 January;129(1):246–8.

Goh G, Walradt T, Markarov V, et al. Mutational landscape of MCPyV-positive and MCPyV-negative Merkel cell carcinomas with implications for immunotherapy. Oncotarget 2016 January 19;7(3):3403–15.

Bichakjian CK, Olencki T, Aasi SZ, et al. Merkel cell carcinoma, version 1.2018, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2018 June;16(6):742–774.

D’Angelo SP, Bhatia S, Brohl AS, et al. Avelumab in patients with previously treated metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma: long-term data and biomarker analyses from the single-arm phase 2 JAVELIN Merkel 200 trial. J Immunother Cancer 2020 May;8(1):e000674.

Ethics Approval

The study was approved by internal ethics board of the Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione ”G. Pascale” of Napoli Italy, approval number of registry 33/17 OSS.

Consent

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this abstract and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor of this journal.

Clinical Outcome Prediction in COVID-19 Patients by Lymphocyte Subsets Analysis and Monocytes' iTNF-α Expression

In December 2019, a novel coronavirus, "SARS-CoV-2", was recognized as the cause of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Several studies have explored the changes and the role of inflammatory cells and cytokines in the immunopathogenesis of the disease, but until today, the results have been controversial. Based on these premises, we conducted a retrospective assessment of monocyte intracellular TNF-α expression (iTNF-α) and on the frequencies of lymphocyte sub-populations in twenty-five patients with moderate/severe COVID-19. We found lymphopenia in all COVID-19 infected subjects compared to healthy subjects. On initial observation, in patients with favorable outcomes, we detected a high absolute eosinophil count and a high CD4+/CD8+ T lymphocytes ratio, while in the Exitus Group, we observed high neutrophil and CD8+ T lymphocyte counts. During infection, in patients with favorable outcomes, we observed a rise in the lymphocyte count, in the monocyte and in Treg lymphocyte counts, and in the CD4+ and in CD8+ T lymphocytes count but a reduction in the CD4+/CD8+ T lymphocyte ratio. Instead, in the Exitus Group, we observed a reduction in the Treg lymphocyte counts and a decrease in iTNF-α expression. Our preliminary findings point to a modulation of the different cellular mediators of the immune system, which probably play a key role in the outcomes of COVID-19.

Immunotherapy may protect cancer patients from SARS-CoV-2 infection: a single-center retrospective analysis

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) global pandemic has created unique challenges to healthcare systems throughout the world. Ensuring subjects' safety is mandatory especially in oncology, in consideration of cancer patients' particular frailty. We examined the proportion of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) IgM and/or IgG positive subjects in three different groups from Istituto Nazionale Tumori - IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale" in Naples (Campania region, Italy): cancer patients treated with Innovative Immunotherapy (Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors, ICIs), cancer patients undergoing standard Chemotherapies (CHTs) and healthcare providers. 9 out of 287 (3.1%) ICIs patients resulted positive, with a significant lower percentage in respect to CHTs patients (39 positive subjects out of 598, 6.5%) (p = 0.04). There was no statistically significant difference between ICIs cohort and healthcare providers, 48 out of 1050 resulting positive (4.6%). Performing a Propensity Score Matching based on gender and tumor stage, the effect of treatment on seropositivity was analyzed through a regression logistic model and the ICIs treatment resulted to be the only protective factor significantly (p = 0.03) associated with positivity (odds ratio-OR: 0.41; 95% confidence interval-CI 0.18-0.91). According to these preliminary data, ICIs would appear to be a protective factor against the onset of COVID-19 infection.

BRAF Gene and Melanoma: Back to the Future

As widely acknowledged, 40-50% of all melanoma patients harbour an activating BRAF mutation (mostly BRAF V600E). The identification of the RAS-RAF-MEK-ERK (MAP kinase) signalling pathway and its targeting has represented a valuable milestone for the advanced and, more recently, for the completely resected stage III and IV melanoma therapy management. However, despite progress in BRAF-mutant melanoma treatment, the two different approaches approved so far for metastatic disease, immunotherapy and BRAF+MEK inhibitors, allow a 5-year survival of no more than 60%, and most patients relapse during treatment due to acquired mechanisms of resistance. Deep insight into BRAF gene biology is fundamental to describe the acquired resistance mechanisms (primary and secondary) and to understand the molecular pathways that are now being investigated in preclinical and clinical studies with the aim of improving outcomes in BRAF-mutant patients.

A monocentric phase I study of vemurafenib plus cobimetinib plus PEG-interferon (VEMUPLINT) in advanced melanoma patients harboring the V600BRAF mutation

Background

Studies carried out in vitro and in a mouse model have shown that BRAF inhibitors enhance the effects of IFN-α on BRAFV600E melanoma cells through the inhibition of ERK. Therefore, the combination of vemurafenib and IFN-α in patients with BRAFV600E melanoma may provide therapeutic benefits; MEK inhibition may prevent the reactivation of the MAPK pathway induced by BRAF inhibitor resistance.

Patients and methods

In a phase I study, adult patients with advanced BRAFV600-mutated melanoma were treated with vemurafenib + PEG-IFN-α-2b or vemurafenib + cobimetinib + PEG-IFN-α-2b, to assess the safety of the combination and the upregulation of IFN-α/β receptor-1 (IFNAR1).

Results

Eight patients were treated; 59 adverse events with four serious ones (three related to study treatments) were reported. Patients with a pre-treatment IFNAR1 expression on ≤ 35% melanoma cells had a median progression-free survival of 12.0 months (range: 5.6–18.4 months) and a median overall survival of 31.0 months (range: 19.8–42.2 months), while patients with a pre-treatment IFNAR1 expression on > 35% of melanoma cells had a median progression-free survival of 4.0 months (range: 0–8.8; p = 0.03), and a median overall survival of 5 months (p = 0.02). Following treatment, responders had higher levels of growth-suppressor genes, including GAS1 and DUSP1, and genes involved in a metabolically robust immune response, including FAP.

Conclusion

Our study supports the overall safety of the vemurafenib + PEG-IFN-α-2b + cobimetinib combination. IFNAR1 expression levels correlated with response to treatment, including survival. Vemurafenib + PEG-IFN-α-2b + cobimetinib would have difficulty finding a niche in the current treatment scenario for advanced melanoma, but we speculate that our findings may contribute to identify subjects particularly responsive to treatment.

Trial registration: The study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01959633). Registered 10 October 2013, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01959633

Impact of COVID-19 outbreak on cancer immunotherapy in Italy: a survey of young oncologists

Background

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has overwhelmed the health systems worldwide. Data regarding the impact of COVID-19 on cancer patients (CPs) undergoing or candidate for immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are lacking. We depicted the practice and adaptations in the management of patients with solid tumors eligible or receiving ICIs during the COVID-19 pandemic, with a special focus on Campania region.

Methods

This survey (25 questions), promoted by the young section of SCITO (Società Campana di ImmunoTerapia Oncologica) Group, was circulated among Italian young oncologists practicing in regions variously affected by the pandemic: high (group 1), medium (group 2) and low (group 3) prevalence of SARS-CoV-2–positive patients. For Campania region, the physician responders were split into those working in cancer centers (CC), university hospitals (UH) and general hospitals (GH). Percentages of agreement, among High (H) versus Medium (M) and versus Low (L) group for Italy and among CC, UH and GH for Campania region, were compared by using Fisher’s exact tests for dichotomous answers and χ² test for trends relative to the questions with 3 or more options.

Results

This is the first Italian study to investigate the COVID-19 impact on cancer immunotherapy, unique in its type and very clear in the results. The COVID-19 pandemic seemed not to affect the standard practice in the prescription and delivery of ICIs in Italy. Telemedicine was widely used. There was high consensus to interrupt immunotherapy in SARS-CoV-2–positive patients and to adopt ICIs with longer schedule interval. The majority of the responders tended not to delay the start of ICIs; there were no changes in supportive treatments, but some of the physicians opted for delaying surgeries (if part of patients’ planned treatment approach). The results from responders in Campania did not differ significantly from the national ones.

Conclusion

Our study highlights the efforts of Italian oncologists to maintain high standards of care for CPs treated with ICIs, regardless the regional prevalence of COVID-19, suggesting the adoption of similar solutions. Research on patients treated with ICIs and experiencing COVID-19 will clarify the safety profile to continue the treatments, thus informing on the most appropriate clinical conducts.

Outcomes and biomarker analyses among patients with COVID-19 treated with interleukin 6 (IL-6) receptor antagonist sarilumab at a single institution in Italy

BACKGROUND

The inflammatory pathology observed in severe COVID-19 disease caused by the 2019 novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is characterized by elevated serum levels of C reactive protein (CRP) and cytokines, including interferon gamma, interleukin 8 (IL-8), and interleukin 6 (IL-6). Initial reports from the outbreak in Italy, China and the USA have provided anecdotal evidence of improved outcomes with the administration of anti-IL-6 agents, and large-scale trials evaluating these therapies are ongoing.

STUDY DESCRIPTION

In this retrospective case series, clinical outcomes and correlates of response to treatment with the IL-6 receptor antagonist sarilumab are described for 15 patients with COVID-19 from a single institution in Southern Italy. Among 10 patients whose symptoms improved after sarilumab treatment, rapid decreases in CRP levels corresponded with clinical improvement. Lower levels of IL-6 at baseline as well as lower neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio as compared with patients whose COVID-19 did not improve with treatment were associated with sarilumab-responsive disease.

CONCLUSIONS

This observation may reflect a possible clinical benefit regarding early intervention with IL-6-modulatory therapies for COVID-19 and that CRP could be a potential biomarker of response to treatment.

Identification of potential predictive biomarkers of rapid progression and rapid response to anti-PD1 treatment by gene profiling analysis in metastatic melanoma patients

e22068

Background: Anti-PD-1 agents represent a standard treatment for melanoma patients. However, most patients fail to respond, showing in some cases very rapid disease progression. At moment, there are no effective biomarkers that can predict patient's clinical benefit. The aim of this study is to retrospectively identify gene profiling biomarkers that could help to select melanoma patients who most likely respond to anti-PD-1 therapy. Methods: We defined as fast responder (FR) or fast progressor (FP) patients who got clinical response or clinical progression after two cycles of therapy. We collected data from 44 metastatic melanoma patients (21 FR and 23 FP) treated in first-line with anti-PD1 monotherapy (nivolumab or pembrolizumab) at National Cancer Institute of Naples, Italy. Gene expression profiling analysis was performed using NanoString IO 360 panels on PBMCs collected at baseline from 18 patients (10 FR and 8 FP). Patients with ECOG≥2 were excluded. They were all IV stage (5 M1a, 1 M1b, 12 M1c) of which 15 were B-RAF wild-type (83%) and 3 were B-RAF mutated (17%). Statistical associations between treatment response and gene score variables were estimated by Student’s T tests and correction for multiple comparisons by the Benjamini-Hochberg method. Results: Patterns of gene expression were assessed for correlation to response. We compared PBMCs nanostring analysis between FR and FP patients. We found a higher expression of KRas, CD39, IFI16, IL18, FCGR2A, IL1RN, MAP3K8, TLR5, TLR8, MyD88 and NF-kB in FP patients (all with p-value ≤0.005), most of them related to cell proliferation and immunosuppressive mechanism. Instead we found a higher expression of PRF1, PIK3R1, HLA-DPA1, HLA-DRB1, HLA-DOA, CD45RA, LDHB, KIR3DL2, CD2, CD28, CD7, CD27 in FR patients (all with p-value ≤0.01), most of them related to priming and cytolysis. Conclusions: These preliminary data obtained through gene profiling analysis on baseline PBMCs of melanoma patients suggest that a specific gene signature may discriminate FR or FP patients. Our study provides rationale for further investigating gene profiling signature as a potential association for response to immunotherapy.

Correlation of nivolumab 480 mg Q4W with better survival than other nivolumab monotherapy schedule in metastatic melanoma patients

e22008

Background: Nivolumab (nivo) 480 mg (Q4W) flat dose has already been assessed for safety compared to other drug dose regimens in clinical trials [1]. However, few data about melanoma patients treated in real life are available. The aim of our study was to evaluate safety and efficacy in metastatic melanoma pts treated with different schedules of nivo in clinical practice. Methods: We analyzed data from n.124 metastatic melanoma patients who were treated from Jun 2016 to Oct 2019 at NCI of Naples. 83/ 124 (67%) were treated with nivo 480 mg Q4W, and 41/124 (33%) with other schedules (n.26 [63%] with 3 mg/kg, and 15 [37%] with 240 mg Q2W). All patients were stage IV, and n.44/124 (35%) were B-RAF mutated. Nivo was administered as first line in n.95 patients (77%), n. 24 [19%] as second line, and 5 (4%) as third line. Among B-RAF mutated patients, n.23/44 [52%] received a first line with a target-based regimen. According to our previous work [2] we calculated Body Mass Index (BMI). In 93/124 pts the BMI was < 25 (75%), while in 31/124 (25%) BMI was ≥ 25. In the table are summarized other clinical characteristics. Hazard Ratios and their 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were estimated with the Cox model. Association between factors was evaluated with the chi-square test. Results: Our data suggests that nivo 480 mg (Q4W) correlates with a better OS compared with other regimens (HR = 0.48; [95% CI: 0.24-0.96; p = 0.04]). Moreover, better OS trend was also observed in pts with BMI > 25 (HR = 0.48; [95% CI: 0.33-1.74]; p = 0.51) and with B-RAF mutation (HR = 0.53; [95% CI: 0.25-1.14); P = 0.10]). The incidence of any grade toxicities did not differ according the dosage. Conclusions: This retrospective analysis showed a trend of better outcome with nivo 480. This observation warrants further investigation in a larger cohort of pts. [Table: see text]

Nivolumab for the treatment of small cell lung cancer

Introduction: Treatment of extensive-stage SCLC is still a challenge but immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors is showing promising results. Nivolumab alone or in combination with ipilimumab has demonstrated a benefit in terms of response and survival in patients with pre-treated extensive-stage disease and has been approved as third-line therapy after failure of chemotherapy. However, data from two phase III trials with nivolumab are negative. In the first trial, nivolumab was administered as a single agent compared to second-line chemotherapy, while in the second it was given alone or in combination with ipilimumab as maintenance treatment after platinum-based chemotherapy.Areas covered: Our review focuses on the role of immunotherapy, and in particular nivolumab, in the treatment of SCLC, describing the results of the main trials and its future perspectives, with reference to clinical trials with other checkpoint inhibitors.Expert opinion: The future of nivolumab in the treatment of SCLC needs to be clarified with further clinical trials, in which improved patient selection and a more specific setting and/or timepoint of the disease may be identified.

Costs of clinical trials with anticancer biological agents in an Oncologic Italian Cancer Center using the activity-based costing methodology

Aim

The aim of the present study was to assess the estimated “per patient” total cost for a single Oncologic Italian Cancer Center participating in a multicenter clinical trial with new anticancer biological agents using the activity-based costing (ABC) methodology.

Methodology

Nine randomized phase 3 clinical trials employing biological agents at the National Cancer Institute of Napoli, Italy, were analyzed to indentify “per patient” costs of each trial, according to the ABC methodology. The average consumption of resources for a patient completing the entire planned treatment was estimated for each trial. Through interviews of the personnel (doctors, nurses and technicians) and by analyses of the clinical trials protocols, the main activities of the 9 clinical trials were identified and, for each trial, the complete health care pathway of the patients and the treatment programmes were minutely reconstructed. Drug costs were not included because provided by Sponsors.

Principal findings

The average costs of the pre-study, treatment, monitoring, follow-up, audit, and administrative activities accounted for 2.357, 4.783, 700, 372, 1.263, and 9 Euro, respectively. The average total cost estimated for all “per patient” activities, including overhead costs, was 11.379 Euro. Staff costs accounted for € 5.988, while costs of diagnostic test accounted for 3.494 Euro. Clinical trials with immunotherapeutic drugs accounted for higher costs (+601 Euro as oncological staff costs, +1.318 Euro as intermediate services cost and +384 Euro as overheads).

Conclusions

The average total cost estimated for all “per patient” activities of a clinical trial with new anticancer biological agents was 11.379 Euro using the ABC methodology.

SECOMBIT (sequential combo immuno and target therapy study): A three arms prospective, randomized phase II study to evaluate the best sequential approach with combo immunotherapy [ipilimumab (I) /nivolumab (N)] and combo target therapy [encorafenib (E)/binimetinib (B)] in patients with metastatic melanoma and BRAF mutation

TPS9598

Background: Treatment of BRAF-mutated metastatic melanoma has dramatically changed with the introduction of targeted therapy (BRAF and MEK inhibitors) and immune-checkpoint blockade (anti-CTLA4, anti-PD-1, and anti-PD-L1). Target therapy has been associated with high response rates, but short-term responses. Conversely, treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors was found to present with lower response rates, but long-term responses. Synergism has been demonstrated when targeted therapy is combined with immunotherapy. The risk of a high rate of toxicity limits the simultaneous combination of all the four compounds (target agents and immunomodulating monoclonal antibodies). Sequencing of these different combinations seems to be more feasible; finding the right treatment sequence represents an important issue to be addressed. Methods: Approximately, 230 patients with untreated, histologically-confirmed advanced melanoma (measurable disease by RECIST v1.1) and carrying the BRAFV600 mutation will be randomized to Arm A [E+B until disease progression (PD), followed by I+N], or Arm B (I+N until PD, followed by E+B) or Arm C (E+B for 8 weeks, followed by I+N until PD, followed by E+B until PD). Patients will receive the combo treatments with the following schedules: target therapy, E 450mg p.o. od + B 45mg p.o. bid; immunotherapy, I 3mg/kg + N 1mg/kg Q3w x 4 cycles, followed by N 3mg/kg Q2w. The OS (time from the date of randomization until death from any cause) is primary efficacy endpoint of the study. Secondary endpoints include total PFS (time from randomization until the second progression), survival at 2 and 3 years, best overall response rate, duration of response. About 90 patients will take part in the ancillary study for the evaluation of biomarkers on the biological samples available (biopsies + blood samples). 30 Sites in Europe will concur to enroll the patients in the trial. This study is open and currently enrolling patients. Clinical trial information: NCT02631447.

Correlation between previous treatment with BRAF inhibitors and clinical response to pembrolizumab in patients with advanced melanoma

The optimal sequencing of targeted treatment and immunotherapy in the treatment of advanced melanoma is a key question and prospective studies to address this are ongoing. Previous observations suggest that treating first with targeted therapy may select for more aggressive disease, meaning that patients may not gain full benefit from subsequent immunotherapy. In a single-center retrospective analysis, we investigated whether response to pembrolizumab was affected by previous BRAF inhibitor therapy. A total of 42 patients with metastatic cutaneous or mucosal melanoma who had received previous treatment with ipilimumab were treated with pembrolizumab as part of the Italian expanded access program. Sixteen of these patients had BRAF-mutated melanoma and had also been previously treated with a BRAF inhibitor (vemurafenib or dabrafenib), while 26 had BRAF wild-type melanoma (no previous BRAF inhibitor). Patients with BRAF-mutant melanoma who were previously treated with BRAF inhibitors had a significantly lower median progression-free survival (3 [2.3-3.7] versus not reached [2-8+] mo; p = 0.001) and disease control rate (18.6% versus 65.4%; p = 0.005) than patients with BRAF wild-type, while there was also a trend toward a lower response rate (assessed using immune-related response criteria) although this was not significantly different between groups (12.5% versus 36.4%; p = 0.16). These data are consistent with previous reports that BRAF inhibitor therapy may affect subsequent response to immunotherapy.

Assessing a novel immuno-oncology-based combination therapy: Ipilimumab plus electrochemotherapy

Melanoma is responsible for most skin cancer-related deaths and is one of the most common cancers diagnosed in young adults. In melanoma, tumors can become established by activation of the negative regulator of cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs), CTL antigen-4 (CTLA-4). Ipilimumab blocks the interaction of CTLA-4 with CD80/CD86 and augments T-cell activation and proliferation. In electrochemotherapy (ECT), local application of short high-voltage pulses renders cell membranes transiently permeable to chemotherapeutic drugs. The combination of ipilimumab and ECT may be beneficial for the treatment of metastatic melanoma; however, no prospective data are available to date. Here, we report the retrospective analysis of patients treated with ipilimumab in an expanded access program (EAP) who also received ECT. Fifteen patients with previously treated metastatic melanoma who received ipilimumab 3 mg/kg every three weeks for four cycles and underwent ECT for local disease control and/or palliation of cutaneous lesions with bleomycin 15 mg/m2 after the first ipilimumab infusion were included in the analysis. Over the study period, a local objective response was observed in 67% of patients (27% complete response [CR] and 40% partial response [PR]). According to immune-related response criteria, a systemic response was observed in nine patients (five PR and four stable disease [SD]), resulting in a disease control rate of 60%. Evaluation of circulating T-regulatory (T-reg) cells demonstrated significant differences between responders and non-responders. Overall, treatment was well-tolerated and without notable toxicity. In conclusion, the combination of ipilimumab and ECT appears to be beneficial to patients with advanced melanoma, warranting further investigation in prospective trials.

Immunological and biological changes during ipilimumab treatment and their potential correlation with clinical response and survival in patients with advanced melanoma

BACKGROUND

Ipilimumab can induce durable disease control and long-term survival in patients with metastatic melanoma. Identification of a biomarker that correlates with clinical benefit and potentially provides an early marker of response is an active area of research.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Ipilimumab was available upon physician request for patients aged ≥16 years with stage III (unresectable) or IV cutaneous, ocular or mucosal melanoma, who had failed or did not tolerate previous treatments and had no other therapeutic option available. Patients received ipilimumab 3 mg/kg every 3 weeks for four doses. Tumour assessments were conducted at baseline, Week 12 and Week 24 using immune-related response criteria. Patients were monitored continuously for adverse events (AEs), including immune-related AEs. Candidate immunological markers were evaluated in peripheral blood and sera samples collected at baseline and Weeks 4, 7, 10 and 12.

RESULTS

Among 95 patients treated with ipilimumab 3 mg/kg, the immune-related disease control rate at Week 24 was 38 %. With a median follow-up of 24 months, median overall survival was 9.6 months. Both disease control and survival were significantly associated with decreasing levels of lactate dehydrogenase, C-reactive protein and FoxP3/regulatory T cells, and increasing absolute lymphocyte count, between baseline and the end of dosing (Week 12).

CONCLUSION

Ipilimumab is a feasible treatment option for heavily pretreated patients with metastatic melanoma. Changes in some immunological markers between baseline and the fourth ipilimumab infusion appear to be associated with disease control and survival, but verification in prospective clinical trials is required.

Serious haematological toxicity during and after ipilimumab treatment: a case series

INTRODUCTION

Immunotherapy with the anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 monoclonal antibody ipilimumab has been shown to improve overall survival in previously treated and treatment-naïve patients with unresectable stage III or IV melanoma. Consistent with its proposed immunomodulating mechanism of action, the most common toxicities associated with ipilimumab therapy are immune-related in nature and include those related to the skin and gastrointestinal tract, with endocrine and hepatic events also frequent. Other rare adverse events, including haematological aberrations, may also occur and can have serious consequences if unrecognised. Here we describe three patients who developed serious haematological adverse events during or after treatment with ipilimumab.

CASE PRESENTATION

Three Caucasian patients (two women aged 68 and 49 years and one man aged 70 years) with metastatic melanoma experienced anaemia and/or leukopenia (neutropenia) with toxicity of various grades during or after treatment with ipilimumab, without significant changes to other haematological values. Two of the patients stopped treatment after the third ipilimumab dose, one because of severe anaemia that required blood transfusion and the other due to febrile neutropenia that was treated with antibiotics and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor stimulation. The third patient developed anaemia and leukopenia after treatment during the follow-up period. The results of autoimmunity tests performed were positive and corticosteroids were used to treat these events as per side-effects treatment algorithms specifically developed for the management of immune-related adverse events associated with ipilimumab, an approach that was safe and effective.

CONCLUSIONS

Haematological toxicity is a rare but potentially serious immune-related side effect of ipilimumab therapy. However, if promptly recognised and treated, haematological toxicity is manageable and can be reversed with standard corticosteroid treatment as recommended for other ipilimumab immune-related side effects.

Abscopal effects of radiotherapy on advanced melanoma patients who progressed after ipilimumab immunotherapy

Cancer radiotherapy (RT) may induce what is referred to as the “abscopal effect,” a regression of non-irradiated metastatic lesions distant from the primary tumor site directly subject to irradiation. This clinical response is rare, but has been surmised to be an immune-mediated phenomenon, suggesting that immunotherapy and RT could potentially synergize. Here, we report the outcome of patients with advanced melanoma treated with the immune checkpoint blockade monoclonal antibody antagonist, ipilimumab followed by RT. Patients were selected for enrollment at the National Cancer Institute “Fondazione G.Pascale” through the expanded access program in Italy. Those who experienced disease progression after ipilimumab thus received subsequent RT and were selected for analysis. Among 21 patients, 13 patients (62%) received RT to treat metastases in the brain and 8 received RT directed at extracranial sites. An abscopal response was observed in 11 patients (52%), 9 of whom had partial responses (43%) and 2 had stable disease (10%). The median time from RT to an abscopal response was 1 month (range 1–4). Median overall survival (OS) for all 21 patients was 13 months (range 6–26). Median OS for patients with abscopal responses was extended to 22.4 months (range 2.5–50.3) vs. 8.3 months (range 7.6–9.0) without. A local response to RT was detected in 13 patients (62%) and, of these, 11 patients (85%) had an abscopal response and abscopal effects were only observed among patients exhibiting a local response. These results suggest RT after ipilimumab may lead to abscopal responses in some patients with advanced melanoma correlating with prolonged OS. Our data also suggest that local responses to RT may be predictive of abscopal responses. Further research in larger randomized trials is needed to validate these results.

Combination therapy with ipilimumab and electrochemotherapy: Preliminary efficacy results and correlation with immunologic parameters

e20031

Background: Ipilimumab is the first agent approved for the treatment of advanced melanoma that showed a survival benefit in randomized phase 3 trials. Despite the survival benefit, due to its mechanism of action it is associated with a slow onset and low rate of responses and, in many cases, responses occur after other therapies, like chemotherapy, targeted therapy and radiotherapy. Electrochemotherapy (ECT) has been shown to be effective and well tolerated for local control of metastatic melanoma with superficial lesions. The current challenge is to improve ipilimumab efficacy by combination/sequence with other therapies. We performed a pilot study of combination with ipilimumab and ECT in order to verify the possible increase of response rate. Furthermore, due to the lack of predictive markers, we evaluated the possible predictive role of circulating T-regulatory cells (T-Reg) variations in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) of treated patients. Methods: We collected data from 10 patients (pts) with advanced melanoma (6 stage IIIc and 4 stage IV M1c) treated with ipilimumab at 3 mg/kg every 3 weeks for 4 cycles (day 1) and ECT with bleomycine at 15 mg/m2 (day 2) on superficial lesions. Blood draws were collected on day 0, 1 and 2, then on day 15 and 30 from ECT, at each cycle of ipilimumab and at every tumor evaluation (every 12 weeks). PBMC were thawed and labeled with anti-CD4-Pe-Cy-5, CD25-Pe and anti-FoxP3-AlexaFlour488 for T-Reg. Results: 10/10 (100%) pts showed local objective responses (4 CR and 6 PR). 7/10 (70%) pts showed local response (6 PR and 1 CR) after the second ipilimumab dose and 3/10 showed response (3 CR) at week 12. Two pts with PR (28%) out of the group of 7 showed response on distant lesions at week 24 (abscopal effect). All pts are still alive with a median follow up of 11 months (range 6-18). We found in all pts a decrease of T-Reg of 0.10% (range 0.50-2.6%) per cycle and no variation of CD4+ and CD25+ lymphocytes. Conclusions: Our preliminary results show that a combination approach with ipilimumab and ECT may increase responses to ipilimumab. T-Reg decrease in PBMC could be associated with response to treatment. Further studies about this combination are warranted.

Abstract 2672: Early evaluation of response to Vemurafenib treatment with FDG PET/CT in patients with metastatic melanoma

Targeted therapy against the V600 mutated form of BRAF is a proven effective therapy for melanoma. Reduction of FDG accumulation on PET/CT studies occurs very rapidly in responding patients. This exploratory study aims to correlate early changes in FDG uptake patterns with treatment outcome in patients undergoing Vemurafenib treatment. Patients treated at our institution were evaluated with PET-CT at baseline and at day 7, 14 and 28 from the start of therapy. Maximal Standardized Uptake Value (SUVmax) and Total Lesion Glycolysis (TLG, mean SUV x lesion volume) were recorded and compared for single lesions in the 4 studies. Patients were then monitored for clinical, laboratory and imaging signs of progression and results correlated to the early PET/CT findings. Fifteen patients have been studied. A total of 87 lesions are available for comparative evaluation. A greater than 30% reduction in SUVmax compared to baseline was seen in 69 lesions at day 7, 76 at day 14 and 75 at day 28. Nineteen lesions showed a greater than 20% increase in FDG uptake between day 14 and 28. Similar results were found when comparing TLG values. Quantitative and visual analysis of PET/CT studies identified 5 patients showing signs of metabolic progression between day 14 and 28 likely indicating early signs of treatment resistance. Three of these patients showed signs of disease progression by other means within 4 months from the beginning of treatment while 2 are still in treatment with 3 months follow-up. Of the 10 patients not showing metabolic signs of progression at day 28, four have progressed between 2 and 9 months from the beginning of treatment, while the remaining 6 are still in treatment and progression free with 2 to 12 months of follow-up. In conclusion, our preliminary results suggest that PET/CT may be a powerful surrogate marker of treatment response to vemurafenib. Sequential monitoring of targeted therapy with PET/CT may be useful in early identification of treatment resistance, aid in tailoring alternative strategies and deserves further investigation.

Citation Format: Luigi Aloj, Corradina Caracò, Francesca Di Gennaro, Antonio M. Grimaldi, Ester Simeone, Marcello Curvietto, Corrado Caracò, Nicola Mozzillo, Valter Torri, Paolo A. Ascierto, Secondo Lastoria. Early evaluation of response to Vemurafenib treatment with FDG PET/CT in patients with metastatic melanoma. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 104th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2013 Apr 6-10; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2013;73(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 2672. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2013-2672

Do BRAF inhibitors select for populations with different disease progression kinetics?

Ipilimumab, an anti-CTLA-4 monoclonal antibody, has been shown to improve overall survival in patients with metastatic melanoma. Preliminary data suggest that patients who fail BRAF inhibitor treatment experience a very rapid progression of disease. Such selectivity for more rapid disease progression may mean these patients do not receive the same benefit from subsequent treatment with ipilimumab as patients without prior BRAF inhibitor treatment. The current challenge is focused on how to identify and approach the two populations of fast and slow progressors and recent hypothesis suggest that treatment choice could be guided by baseline risk factors. However, no data have yet defined which the best sequence is and more research is needed to identify predictors of response in patients with metastatic melanoma to help guide whether a BRAF inhibitor or ipilimumab should be used first in sequential therapy.

Immunological and biological changes during ipilimumab (Ipi) treatment and their correlation with clinical response and survival

8573

Background: Ipilimumab (Ipi) is approved in the US as first and second line therapy in patients with metastatic melanoma (MM) and in MM patients with previous therapy in the EU, based on an overall survival benefit shown in a phase III study (Hodi, NEJM 2010). To date, no clinical parameter has been found to be predictive for response to treatment and only few immunologic changes have been identified as potential candidates. Methods: From June 2010 to November 2011 we treated in the Expanded Access Program with Ipi at 3 mg/kg, 95 pre-treated metastatic melanoma patients. The median age was 58 yrs (range 17-84); 10 pts (10,5%) were stage IIIc inoperable, 2 pts (2,1%) stage M1a, 4 pts (4,2%) stage M1b, and 79 pts (83,2%) stage M1c. 30/95 pts had brain metastases and 1/95 spinal cord metastases. All 95 patients were evaluable for response (DCR = CR+PR+SD according the irRC), overall survival, safety, including changes in LDH, CRP (C-reactive protein) and lymphocyte populations (CD4+,CD4CD25+,FOXP3/T-Reg cells). PBMC and sera were collected at week 0, 4, 7, 10 and 12. Results: We found a statistical significant decrease of LDH, CRP and FOXP3/T-Reg cells (p<0.0001; χ2 and Mann-Whitney), and an increase of lymphocyte count (p<.0001) in the responders group. These differences were also correlated to survival (log-rank test). No differences were observed for CD4+ and CD4+CD25+ between responders and non-responders (p=0.39;p=0.83; Mann-Whitney). An ORR of 22.1% (1CR+20PR; 95% CI 13.8-30.4) and a DCR at week 24 of 37.9% (36/95; 28.1-47.6, 95% CI) were observed. Median overall survival was estimated of 7.8 months (95%CI:5.0-10.6), with a p value not evaluable at the moment of the analysis due to insufficient follow-up because of long-term survival. Adverse events were registered in 40% (38/95) of patients and the most frequent were of grade 1 and 2 (pruritus 57.9%; rash 5.3%; thyroditis 5.3%). Conclusions: The decrease of LDH, CRP and T-Reg cells during Ipi treatment suggest these parameters should be further explored as potential predictive markers for response and survival. Given the potential clinical utility of these findings, these data warrants further prospective validation in a randomized trial.

An imaging study of vemurafenib in patients with BRAFV600-mutated metastatic melanoma

e19034

Background: Targeted therapy against the mutated form of BRAF V600 is a proven effective therapy for melanoma. Objective of this exploratory study was to describe the change over time of PET-scan results and verify the association of PET-scan examination with the objective response (OR) (defined by RECIST criteria) in melanoma pts treated with vemurafenib. These preliminary results reported here regards the description of changes over time of PET-scan. Methods: Patients treated with vemurafenib at our institution were considered eligible. Patients were evaluated with PET-scan at baseline and at day 7, 15 and 30 from the start of therapy. Maximal Standardized Uptake Value (SUVmax) and Total Lesion Glycolysis (mean SUV x lesion volume) were recorded and compared for single lesions in the 4 exams. Differences between each PET-scan performed during therapy and baseline were calculated and coded as yes/no response basing on predefined criteria. Association of PET responses and achievement of OR were estimated by means of logistic regression models. Odds ratio and C statistics were used to define strength of association and discriminant capability. C statistics obtained with PET/CT at different timepoints were compared. Results: As of January 2012, 7 out of 20 required pts have been enrolled. A total of 48 lesions were available for evaluation. A reduction in lesion SUVmax and TLG values compared to baseline was evident in all the post-therapy studies (reduction in SUV max at day 7 – 51 ± 28 %, day 14 – 67 ± 24 % and day 30 –69 ± 29 %, reduction in TLG at day 7 – 41 ± 83 %, day 14 – 69 ± 35 % and day 30 – 68 ± 37 %). A comparison of the day 15 and day 30 studies showed essentially stable uptake values (SUV max variation -3 ± 41 %, TLG 5 ± 56 %). However, 14/23 lesions in 3 patients showed increased SUV max and TLG values between the day 15 and day 30 studies likely indicating early signs of treatment resistance. Conclusions: Our preliminary results suggest that PET/CT may be an early surrogate marker of treatment response to vemurafenib. Sequential monitoring of targeted therapy with PET/CT may be useful in identification of treatment resistance, aid in tailoring alternative strategies and deserves further investigation.