Mu Opioid Receptor 1 (MOR-1) Expression in Colorectal Cancer and Oncological Long-Term Outcomes: A Five-Year Retrospective Longitudinal Cohort Study

Impact of opioids and mu-opioid receptors on oncologic metastasis

Opioids are the most effective and widely used treatments for acute and chronic pain in patients with cancer. This review focuses on the impact of opioids and mu-opioid receptors (MORs) on the stages of oncologic metastasis. Studies have shown that opioids can facilitate tumor progression and are related to a poor prognosis in patients with cancer. As the primary receptor for opioids, MORs play a significant role in regulating malignant tumor transformation and are involved in processes, such as proliferation, angiogenesis, epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and the tumor microenvironment (TME). While clinical trials have investigated the relationship between opioids and patient prognosis, further research is needed to clarify the relationship between opioids, MORs and metastasis.

Morphine promotes non-small cell lung cancer progression by downregulating E-cadherin via the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway

Morphine has been suggested to affect cancer cell dynamics and decrease survival rates in lung cancer patients at specific doses, but the precise mechanisms poorly understood. In this study, we aimed to investigate the molecular mechanisms by which morphine modulates the malignant characteristics of non-small cell lung cancer. Cell proliferation was assessed via the Cell Counting Kit-8 assay, and cell migration and invasion were examined via wound healing and Transwell assays. We employed immunofluorescence staining to evaluate E-cadherin expression in A549 and Lewis lung cancer (LLC) cell lines and immunohistochemistry to evaluate E-cadherin expression in nude mice tumours. Additionally, the in vivo effects of morphine on lung cancer progression were explored in a xenograft tumour experiments, in which naloxone was used as a morphine antagonist. Western blot analysis was performed to detect E-cadherin, phosphorylated mTOR (p-mTOR), mTOR, phosphorylated AKT (p-AKT), AKT, phosphorylated PI3K (p-PI3K), and PI3K protein levels in A549 and LLC cells as well as in tumour samples. Morphine (10 µM) significantly increased the proliferation of A549 and LLC cells in vitro (p < 0.05). It also enhanced the migratory and invasive capacities of these cell lines (p < 0.01). Mechanistically, morphine treatment (10 µM) led to a reduction in the expression of E-cadherin, and an increase in the phosphorylation of PI3K, AKT, and mTOR in A549 and LLC cells (p < 0.01). Morphine treatment (1.5 mg/kg) also reduced E-cadherin expression in xenograft tumours and promoted tumour growth in vivo (p < 0.05). This effect was reversed by naloxone (0.1 mg/kg). The results demonstrated that morphine stimulates the malignant proliferation of A549 and LLC cell lines and promotes xenograft tumour growth. Perhaps by specifically targeting MOR, morphine triggers a signalling cascade that activates the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway while inhibiting the EMT marker E-cadherin, which may consequently promote the progression of lung cancer.

Opioids and Cancer: Current Understanding and Clinical Considerations

Pain is one of the most common symptoms in patients with cancer. Pain not only negatively affects the quality of life of patients with cancer, but it has also been associated with reduced survival. Pain management is therefore a critical component of cancer care. Prescription opioids remain the first-line approach for the management of moderate-to-severe pain associated with cancer. However, there has been increasing interest in understanding whether these analgesics could impact cancer progression. Furthermore, epidemiological data link a possible association between prescription opioid usage and cancer development. Until more robust evidence is available, patients with cancer with moderate-to-severe pain may receive opioids to decrease suffering. However, future studies should be conducted to evaluate the role of opioids and opioid receptors in specific cancers.

The Effect of Intraoperative Fentanyl Consumption on Prognosis of Colorectal Liver Metastasis treated by Simultaneous Resection: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis

Background: No previous studies have reported the effect of intraoperative opioid consumption in colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM).

Methods: Medical records of patients who received simultaneous resection of CRLM were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with epidural anesthesia, intraoperative morphine, or intraoperative oxycodone were excluded. Patients were separated into high- and low-dose groups by median intraoperative equianalgesic fentanyl dose. Short-term outcomes, progression-free surcical (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared between groups before and after 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM). Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analysis were performed to identify independent predictors of survival.

Results: The final study population included 343 patients. Patients were separated into the low dose group (n=172) and the high dose group (n=171) by median intraoperative equianalgesic fentanyl dose (8.33 μg/kg). After PSM, 55 patients in the low dose group were matched to 55 patients in the high dose group and the baseline characteristics of the two groups were balanced. The two groups had no statistically significance difference in severity and categories of postoperative complications before and after PSM. Before PSM, the two groups had similar PFS (median 10.2 vs. 12.4 months, P=0.54) and OS (median 59.0 vs. 58.3 months, P=0.76). Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses revealed no statistically significant association between intraoperative equianalgesic fentanyl and PFS (multivariate HR=0.852, 95% CI 0.655-1.11, P=0.235) and OS (multivariate HR=1, 95% CI 0.68-1.49, P = 0.981). After PSM, the two groups also had similar PFS (median 9.2 vs. 10.7 months, P=0.98) and OS (median 51.0 vs. 46.0 months, P=0.39). Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses revealed no statistically significant association between intraoperative equianalgesic fentanyl and PFS (multivariate HR=1.05, 95% CI 0.632-1.73, P=0.861) and OS (multivariate HR=1.74, 95% CI 0.892-3.38, P = 0.105).

Conclusion: Intraoperative opioids consumption was not correlated with outcomes of CRLM patients treated with simultaneous resection.

The µ-Opioid Receptor in Cancer and Its Role in Perineural Invasion: A Short Review and New Evidence

Cancer is a significant public health problem worldwide. While there has been a steady decrease in the cancer death rate over the last two decades, the number of survivors has increased and, thus, cancer-related sequela. Pain affects the life of patients with cancer and survivors. Prescription opioids continue as the analgesic of choice to treat moderate-to-severe cancer-related pain. There has been controversy on whether opioids impact cancer progression by acting on cancer cells or the tumor microenvironment. The μ-opioid receptor is the site of action of prescription opioids. This receptor can participate in an important mechanism of cancer spread, such as perineural invasion. In this review, current evidence on the role of the μ-opioid receptor in cancer growth is summarized and preliminary evidence about its effect on the cross-talk between sensory neurons and malignant cells is provided.

Voacamine is a novel inhibitor of EGFR exerting oncogenic activity against colorectal cancer through the mitochondrial pathway

Colorectal cancer (CRC), among the most aggressive and prevailing neoplasms, is primarily treated with chemotherapy. Voacamine (VOA), a novel bisindole natural product, possesses a variety of conspicuous pharmacological activities. Within the current research, we evaluated in vitro and in vivo the anticancer efficacy of VOA against CRC and its potential mechanisms. Our results illustrated that VOA concentrationdependently suppressed the proliferation and migration of CT26 and HCT116 cells as correspondingly indicated by IC₅₀ values of 1.38 ± 0.09 μM and 4.10 ± 0.14 μM. Furthermore, treatment of VOA also suppressed tumor cell colony formation, escalated the late-stage apoptosis rate of tumor cells, and evoked cell cycle of CT26 and HCT116 cells arrest inhibition in G2-M and G0-G1 phases, respectively. Meanwhile, VOA markedly disrupted the mitochondrial membrane potential eliciting mitochondrial dysfunction, decreased ATP production, and intermediated an enhanced accumulation of intracellular reactive oxygen species with a concentration-dependent pattern, accompanied by elevated expression levels of pro-apoptotic related protein Bax, Cyt-C, cleaved caspases 3/8/9 and by diminished Bcl-2, Bid, PRAP and caspases 3/8/9 expression. Further mechanistic studies revealed VOA treatment suppressed the EGFR/PI3K/Akt pathway with the evidence of the decreased phosphorylation proteins of EGFR, PI3K, Akt, and downstream proteins of p-mTOR, p-NF-kB, and p-P70S6. Additionally, molecular dynamics simulations further displayed VOA could enter the EGFR pocket followed by multiple mutual interaction effects. Interestingly, the EGFR activator (NSC228155) could slack the inhibitory capability of VOA on the EGFR/PI3K/Akt pathway as well as VOA-induced impairment of mitochondrial function. Finally, administration of VOA (15, 30 mg/kg every 2 days, i.p., for 16 days) in CT26 syngeneic mice dose-dependently suppressed the neoplastic development without appreciable organ toxicities. Taken together, our study demonstrated that VOA may be a prospective therapeutic agent for the treatment of CRC.

Association of Mu-Opioid Receptor Expression With Long-Term Survival and Perineural Nerve Invasion in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Ovarian Cancer

Background

Opioids are widely used during primary debulking surgery (PDS) for ovarian cancers, and a high mu-opioid receptor (MOR) expression predicts worse cancer outcomes. However, the impact of MOR expression on survival outcomes in ovarian cancers is still not clear.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study was conducted in patients who underwent PDS in ovarian cancer patients. MOR expression was measured in tumor and normal tissue. Primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Secondary outcomes included perineural invasion (PNI), intraoperative sufentanil consumption, length of stay (LOS), and verbal numerical rating scale (VNRS) on postoperative day 1 (POD1), POD3, and POD5.

Results

After propensity score matching, a total of 366 patients were finally enrolled in this study. There were no significant differences in OS rates in patients with high versus low levels of MOR (1-year OS: 82.9% versus 83.3%, 3-year: 57.8% versus 59.1%, 5-year: 22.4% versus 23.1%,respectively) in the ovarian cancers. There were no significant differences in DFS between the groups. Intraoperative sufentanil consumption was higher in the MOR high-expression group compared with the MOR low-expression group. Tumors expressing high levels of MOR showed higher rates of PNI. VNRS in the MOR high-expression group was higher on POD1.

Conclusion

MOR is not an independent predictor of worse survival in ovarian cancers but is associated with high rates of perineural invasion.

Antagonists of the Mu-Opioid Receptor in the Cancer Patient: Fact or Fiction?

Purpose of Review

Antagonists of mu-opioid receptor role in cancer progression remains to be elucidated. The objective of this review was to summarize the available evidence on antagonists of mu-opioid receptor effect on tumor progression and prognosis in different types of cancers and an evaluation of the available findings on their mechanism of action.

Recent Findings

We have found studies related to methylnaltrexone (MNTX) and naltrexone (NTX) usage in cancer outcomes-related setting. We found consistent preclinical evidence of a potential action of MNTX and NTX on cancer growth and spread mediated mainly by effect on the opioid growth factor receptor (OGFr) axis, which results in depressed cell replication. However, clinical results are scarce and limited to poor-quality evidence.

Summary

Further high-quality studies are warranted to study antagonists of mu-opioid receptor role as a therapeutic option in different types of cancer, especially in patients where the classical treatment causes unacceptable side effects.

Endogenous opiates and behavior: 2020

This paper is the forty-third consecutive installment of the annual anthological review of research concerning the endogenous opioid system, summarizing articles published during 2020 that studied the behavioral effects of molecular, pharmacological and genetic manipulation of opioid peptides and receptors as well as effects of opioid/opiate agonists and antagonists. The review is subdivided into the following specific topics: molecular-biochemical effects and neurochemical localization studies of endogenous opioids and their receptors (1), the roles of these opioid peptides and receptors in pain and analgesia in animals (2) and humans (3), opioid-sensitive and opioid-insensitive effects of nonopioid analgesics (4), opioid peptide and receptor involvement in tolerance and dependence (5), stress and social status (6), learning and memory (7), eating and drinking (8), drug abuse and alcohol (9), sexual activity and hormones, pregnancy, development and endocrinology (10), mental illness and mood (11), seizures and neurologic disorders (12), electrical-related activity and neurophysiology (13), general activity and locomotion (14), gastrointestinal, renal and hepatic functions (15), cardiovascular responses (16), respiration and thermoregulation (17), and immunological responses (18).

Opioid Receptor Expression in Colorectal Cancer: A Nested Matched Case-Control Study

Background

There is growing interest in the possible effect of perioperative anesthetic management on the growth and spread of cancer. The impact of perioperative use of opioids on cancer recurrence remains controversial and an assessment cannot yet be established based on current publications. This study aimed to assess the differential expression of opioid receptors between healthy and tumor tissues in patients with stage II and III colorectal cancer undergoing elective surgery by immunohistochemistry (IHC).

Methods

Propensity-score matched case-control study nested in a retrospective cohort of patients with stage II or III colorectal. The primary endpoint was the difference in µ-opioid receptor (MOR) expression measured by IHC between tumor and healthy tissue in subject with or without recurrence. Secondary endpoints were to evaluate the differences in Opioid Growth Factor Receptor (OGFR), cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) production and protein kinase A (PKA) in the matched sample and from a from samples of colorectal cancer stored in the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and Genotype Tissue Expression Project (GTEx).

Results

There was a significant difference in MOR receptor (median 3 [intequartile range IQR: 1-3] and 0 [IQR: 0-2], P<0.001) and OGFR receptor (median 6 [IQR: 5-6] and 2 [IQR: 1-2], P<0.001) in tumor and control tissue respectively. However, there were no significant differences in cAMP nor PKA expression between both types of tissues and in expression in any of the analyzed variables by recurrence status. The MOR and OGFR expression data from TCGA database were similar to our sample size data with lower expression of MOR and higher expression of OGFR in tumoural samples with a skewed distribution for MOR expression in tumor tissue both in patients with and without recurrence.

Conclusion

In patients with stage II and III colorectal cancer, overall expression of MOR and OGFR was significantly increased but was not different between previously matched patients with or without recurrence. No differences were found in the analyzed metabolic pathway of cAMP-PKA: These results were confirmed by an in silico analysis of samples from the TCGA-GTEx database.

Effect of combined epidural-general anesthesia on long-term survival of patients with colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis of cohort studies

PURPOSE

This study aimed to analyze the long-term survival of patients with colorectal cancer after receiving combined epidural-general anesthesia (EGA) or general anesthesia (GA) alone.

METHODS

The PubMed, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases were used to search for cohort studies that explored the differences between the effects of EGA and GA on overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) of patients with colorectal cancer. The hazard ratios (HRs) and their 95% confidence intervals (95%CIs) were used as indicators to evaluate the strength of the effects and were pooled.

RESULTS

Nine studies were included in the meta-analysis. EGA improved the OS of patients with colorectal cancer compared with GA (HR = 0.904, 95%CI 0.871-0.938, P < 0.05). In the subgroup analysis, EGA was more protective for OS of patients with colon cancer than GA (HR = 0.840, 95%CI 0.732-0.963, P < 0.05), but not for OS of patients with rectal cancer (HR = 0.764, 95%CI 0.398-1.469, P > 0.05). Additionally, EGA could not further prolong RFS in patients with colorectal cancer (HR = 1.015, 95%CI 0.942-1.093, P > 0.05), which was the same in the subgroup analysis of patients with colon cancer (HR = 0.908, 95%CI 0.760-1.085, P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

EGA could improve the OS of patients with colorectal cancer, especially those with colon cancer, but it could not improve the OS in the subgroup of patients with rectal cancer. This difference may be due to the immune protective function of the parasympathetic nerve innervating the intestinal tubes above the splenic flexure retained by EGA. Additionally, although EGA has a protective effect on RFS in patients with colorectal cancer, the difference was not significant.  The design of this analysis is registered and displayed in the PROSPERO database (CRD42021274864).

Agonists Specific for κ-Opioid Receptor Induces Apoptosis of HCC Cells Through Enhanced Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress

Cancer pain is an important factor affecting life quality of patients especially in the advanced stage and relieving pain is one of fundamental strategies for cancer treatment. Opioids such as morphine are the most widely used in clinics. However, they have been reported to be associated with the occurrence and development of several types of cancer. Thus, search for an opioid that has analgesic effect and can retard cancer progress simultaneously is critical for cancer management. In this study, we first examined the expression of μ and κ (MOR and KOR) in cell lines and tumor tissues of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), a malignant tumor with high mortality, and then compared the effects of opioid receptors-specific agonists on malignant phenotypes of HCC cells in vitro and tumor growth in an HCC xenograft mouse model. KOR and MOR were found to be highly expressed in HCC cell lines and HCC tissues. The KOR-specific agonist U50488h, oxycodone (agonist for both KOR and MOR) and the MOR-specific agonist morphine inhibited HCC cell proliferation, while only U50488h and oxycodone suppressed colony formation and migration of HCC cells. U50488h and oxycodone, but not morphine, induced HCC apoptosis. Further detection of PERK, GRP78 and CHOP revealed that PERK signaling was upregulated by treatment with U50488h, while treatment with the PERK inhibitor GSK2656157 partially reversed the promotion of apoptosis and inhibition of cell proliferation by U50488h, indicating that endoplasmic reticulum stress is associated with its suppressing effect on HCC malignant phenotypes. Similar to the in vitro results, HCC growth was significantly reduced by administration of U50488h and oxycodone, but not by morphine, in the HCC xenograft mouse model. PERK and caspase-3 in the HCC tissues were up-regulated by U50488h treatment as detected by immunohistochemistry and western blotting. Taken together, our results revealed that activation of KOR by U50488h inhibited malignant phenotypes of HCC both in vitro and in vivo, while activation of MOR by morphine did not have such effect. Because of their dual roles in the relief of pain and in the suppression of malignant phenotypes, opioids such as U50488h that act on KOR should be considered as the first choice for HCC management.

Solid Tumor Opioid Receptor Expression and Oncologic Outcomes: Analysis of the Cancer Genome Atlas and Genotype Tissue Expression Project

Background

Opioid receptors are expressed not only by neural cells in the central nervous system, but also by many solid tumor cancer cells. Whether perioperative opioids given for analgesia after tumor resection surgery might inadvertently activate tumor cells, promoting recurrence or metastasis, remains controversial. We analysed large public gene repositories of solid tumors to investigate differences in opioid receptor expression between normal and tumor tissues and their association with long-term oncologic outcomes.

Methods

We investigated the normalized gene expression of µ, κ, δ opioid receptors (MOR, KOR, DOR), Opioid Growth Factor (OGFR), and Toll-Like 4 (TLR4) receptors in normal and tumor samples from twelve solid tumor types. We carried out mixed multivariable logistic and Cox regression analysis on whether there was an association between these receptors' gene expression and the tissue where found, i.e., tumor or normal tissue. We also evaluated the association between tumor opioid receptor gene expression and patient disease-free interval (DFI) and overall survival (OS).

Results

We retrieved 8,780 tissue samples, 5,852 from tumor and 2,928 from normal tissue, of which 2,252 were from the Genotype Tissue Expression Project (GTEx) and 672 from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) repository. The Odds Ratio (OR) [95%CI] for gene expression of the specific opioid receptors in the examined tumors varied: MOR: 0.74 [0.63-0.87], KOR: 1.27 [1.17-1.37], DOR: 1.66 [1.48-1.87], TLR4: 0.29 [0.26-0.32], OGFR: 2.39 [2.05-2.78]. After controlling all confounding variables, including age and cancer stage, there was no association between tumor opioid receptor expression and long-term oncologic outcomes.

Conclusion

Opioid receptor gene expression varies between different solid tumor types. There was no association between tumor opioid receptor expression and recurrence. Understanding the significance of opioid receptor expression on tumor cells remains elusive.

Perioperative pain, analgesics and cancer-related outcomes: where do we stand?

Cancer-related pain is one of the most common and debilitating symptoms among cancer patients. Undertreated cancer-related pain interferes with daily activities and increases morbidity and mortality. While opioids continue to play an essential role in treating moderate to severe cancer-related pain, they are associated with many adverse effects including misuse. While preclinical and retrospective studies have shown a negative association between opioid use and cancer outcomes, randomized control trials demonstrate that opioid use does not influence cancer recurrence. Additionally, analgesics and adjuvants used for perioperatively or chronic pain control are unlikely to improve oncological outcomes. This article focuses on the pharmacological management of cancer-related pain and offers an overview regarding the use of these medications perioperatively and the cancer outcomes.

Transcriptome profiling by combined machine learning and statistical R analysis identifies TMEM236 as a potential novel diagnostic biomarker for colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a common cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. The CRC mRNA gene expression dataset containing 644 CRC tumor and 51 normal samples from the cancer genome atlas (TCGA) was pre-processed to identify the significant differentially expressed genes (DEGs). Feature selection techniques Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and Relief were used along with class balancing for obtaining features (genes) of high importance. The classification of the CRC dataset was done by ML algorithms namely, random forest (RF), K-nearest neighbour (KNN), and artificial neural networks (ANN). The significant DEGs were 2933, having 1832 upregulated and 1101 downregulated genes. The CRC gene expression dataset had 23,186 features. LASSO had performed better than Relief for classifying tumor and normal samples through ML algorithms namely RF, KNN, and ANN with an accuracy of 100%, while Relief had given 79.5%, 85.05%, and 100% respectively. Common features between LASSO and DEGs were 38, from them only 5 common genes namely, VSTM2A, NR5A2, TMEM236, GDLN, and ETFDH had shown statistically significant survival analysis. Functional review and analysis of the selected genes helped in downsizing the 5 genes to 2, which are VSTM2A and TMEM236. Differential expression of TMEM236 was statistically significant and was markedly reduced in the dataset which solicits appreciation for assessment as a novel biomarker for CRC diagnosis.

Association of Mu-Opioid Receptor(MOR) Expression and Opioids Requirement With Survival in Patients With Stage I-III Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

Background

The use of opioids in patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is associated with shorter survival and not dependent on the expression of the mu-opioid receptor (MOR). The role of opioid use and MOR expression in stage I-III PDAC has not been investigated.

Methods

We conducted retrospective study in patients with stage I-III PDAC. MOR expression and OPRM1 gene expression in tumour tissue and non-tumour tissue was measured. Primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Secondary endpoints included perineural invasion, intraoperative sufentanil consumption, and length of stay. We performed a subgroup group analysis to evaluate the interaction between levels of MOR expression, amount of opioids use (high versus low) and its association with survival.

Results

A total of 236 patients were enrolled in this study.There were no significantly difference in OS rates in patients with high versus low levels of MOR (1-year OS: 65.2% versus 70.6%, P=0.064; 3-year: 31.4% versus 35.8%, P=0.071; 5-year: 19.4% versus. 16.2%, P=0.153, respectively) in the tumours. The DFS rates between the groups were no significantly difference. Of note, a high expression of MOR combined with high opioid consumption was associated with poor prognosis in stage I-III PDAC patients. Tumor expressing high levels of MOR show higher rates of perineural invasion.

Conclusion

MOR is not an independent predictor of poor survival in stage I-III PDAC but associated with perineural invasion. Patients requiring high amounts of opioids intraoperatively show worse outcome if they are expressing high levels of MOR.

Morphine promotes tumorigenesis and cetuximab resistance via EGFR signaling activation in human colorectal cancer

Morphine, a mu-opioid receptor (MOR) agonist, has been extensively used to treat advanced cancer pain. In particular, in patients with cancer metastasis, both morphine and anticancer drugs are given simultaneously. However, evidence showed that morphine might be a risk factor in promoting the tumor's malignant potential. In this study, we report that treatment with morphine could activate MOR and lead to the promotion of proliferation, migration, and invasion in HCT116 and DLD1 colorectal cancer (CRC) cells with time-concentration dependence. Moreover, morphine can also contribute to cetuximab's drug resistance, a targeted drug widely used to treat advanced CRC by inducing the activation of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). The cell phenotype includes proliferation, migration, invasion, and drug resistance, which may be reversed by MOR knockdown or adding nalmefene, the MOR receptor antagonist. Receptor tyrosine kinase array analysis revealed that morphine selectively induced the transactivation of EGFR. EGFR transactivation resulted in the activation of ERK1/2 and AKT. In conclusion, morphine induces the transactivation of EGFR via MOR. It activates the downstream signal pathway AKT-MTOR and RAS-MAPK, increases proliferation, migration, and invasion, and promotes resistance to EGFR inhibitors in a CRC cell line. Furthermore, we verified that EGFR inhibition by cetuximab strongly reversed the protumoral effects of morphine in vitro and in vivo. Collectively, we provide evidence that morphine-EGFR signaling might be a promising therapeutic target for CRC patients, especially for cetuximab-resistant CRC patients.

Opioids and cancer prognosis: A summary of the clinical evidence

Pain is a common and devastating symptom among cancer patients. It can be caused by the cancer itself or by certain therapies like surgery, radiation or chemotherapy. Opioids are the first line of treatment for moderate to severe cancer-related pain. Opioids alone or in combination with non-opioid analgesics and adjuvant medications are important components for pain management during the perioperative period for cancer patients. Opioids act on the μ-opioid receptor (MOR), which is expressed in cancer cells and non-malignant cells of the tumor microenvironment. Retrospective studies suggest an association between the expression of MOR in cancers and shorter survival. In addition, recent evidence suggests that opium use and prescription opioids can influence clinical oncological outcomes. In this review, we will summarize the clinical evidence regarding the effect of opioid administration and survival in patients with cancer as well as the current evidence involving MOR expression and cancer progression.

The association of prescription opioid use with incident cancer: A Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare population-based case-control study

BACKGROUND

Cancer is the second leading cause of death globally, and researchers seek to identify modifiable risk factors Over the past several decades, there has been ongoing debate whether opioids are associated with cancer development, metastasis, or recurrence. Basic science, clinical, and observational studies have produced conflicting results. The authors examined the association between prescription opioids and incident cancers using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database. A complex relation was observed between prescription opioids and incident cancer, and cancer site may be an important determinant.

METHODS

By using linked SEER cancer registry and Medicare claims from 2008 through 2013, a case-control study was conducted examining the relation between cancer onset and prior opioid exposure. Logistic regression was used to account for differences between cases and controls for 10 cancer sites.

RESULTS

Of the population studied (n = 348,319), 34% were prescribed opioids, 79.5% were white, 36.9% were dually eligible (for both Medicare and Medicaid), 13% lived in a rural area, 52.7% had ≥1 comorbidity, and 16% had a smoking-related diagnosis. Patients exposed to opioids had a lower odds ratio (OR) associated with breast cancer (adjusted OR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.92-0.99) and colon cancer (adjusted OR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.86-0.93) compared with controls. Higher ORs for kidney cancer, leukemia, liver cancer, lung cancer, and lymphoma, ranging from lung cancer (OR, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.01-1.07) to liver cancer (OR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.08-1.31), were present in the exposed population.

CONCLUSIONS

The current results suggest that an association exists between prescription opioids and incident cancer and that cancer site may play an important role. These findings can direct future research on specific patient populations that may benefit or be harmed by prescription opioid exposure.

Increased mu-opioid receptor expression is associated with reduced disease-free and overall survival in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Expression of the mu-opioid receptor (MOR) is associated with poor long-term outcomes in various types of cancer. The association between MOR expression and clinical outcomes in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC) is not clear.

METHODS

This retrospective study included patients who underwent laryngectomy for LSCC. The expression pattern of the MOR protein and OPRM1 gene in tumours and corresponding adjacent non-carcinoma specimens was measured. Propensity score matching was used to minimise bias. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). The secondary endpoints were intraoperative sufentanil consumption, grade of surgical complications according to the Clavien-Dindo classification, and hospital length of stay.

RESULTS

A total of 207 LSCC patients were enrolled. After propensity score matching, there was a significant difference in DFS between groups at 1, 3, and 5 yr (60.2% vs 81.2%, P=0.019; 39.4% vs 50.2%, P=0.026; 37.5% vs 42.5%, P=0.023, respectively) in patients with high MOR expression. The OS rates at 1, 3, and 5 yr were significantly lower in the high MOR expression group (81.2% vs 93.2%, P=0.027; 57.7% vs 78.3%, P<0.001; 42.5% vs 60.3%, P<0.001, respectively). The multivariate analysis indicated that high MOR expression was associated with worse DFS and OS (hazard ratio: 1.52, 95% confidence interval: 1.07, 2.25, P=0.034; hazard ratio: 1.42, 95% confidence interval: 1.17, 2.34, P=0.032).

CONCLUSION

High MOR expression may be associated with poor prognosis in patients with LSCC, suggesting that MOR could be used as a valuable molecular biomarker to predict prognosis of LSCC patients.