Prognostic Impact of PD-L1 Expression in pN1 NSCLC: A Retrospective Single-Center Analysis

Circular RNAs as key regulators in cancer hallmarks: New progress and therapeutic opportunities

Circular RNAs (circRNAs) have emerged as critical regulators in cancer biology, contributing to various cancer hallmarks, including cell proliferation, apoptosis, metastasis, and drug resistance. Defined by their covalently closed loop structure, circRNAs possess unique characteristics like high stability, abundance, and tissue-specific expression. These non-coding RNAs function through mechanisms such as miRNA sponging, interactions with RNA-binding proteins (RBPs), and modulating transcription and splicing. Advances in RNA sequencing and bioinformatics tools have enabled the identification and functional annotation of circRNAs across different cancer types. Clinically, circRNAs demonstrate high specificity and sensitivity in samples, offering potential as diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers. Additionally, therapeutic strategies involving circRNA mimics, inhibitors, and delivery systems are under investigation. However, their precise mechanisms remain unclear, and more clinical evidence is needed regarding their roles in cancer hallmarks. Understanding circRNAs will pave the way for novel diagnostic and therapeutic approaches, potentially improving patient outcomes.

Role of Proteins in Oncology: Advances in Cancer Diagnosis, Prognosis, and Targeted Therapy-A Narrative Review

Modern oncology increasingly relies on the role of proteins as key components in cancer diagnosis, prognosis, and targeted therapy. This review examines advancements in protein biomarkers across several cancer types, including breast cancer, lung cancer, ovarian cancer, and hepatocellular carcinoma. These biomarkers have proven critical for early detection, treatment response monitoring, and tailoring personalized therapeutic strategies. The article highlights the utility of targeted therapies, such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors and monoclonal antibodies, in improving treatment efficacy while minimizing systemic toxicity. Despite these advancements, challenges like tumor resistance, variability in protein expression, and diagnostic heterogeneity persist, complicating universal application. The review underscores future directions, including the integration of artificial intelligence, advanced protein analysis technologies, and the development of combination therapies to overcome these barriers and refine personalized cancer treatment.

Tumor markers in non-small cell lung cancer spine metastasis: an assessment of prognosis and overall survival

PURPOSE

The identification of gene mutations in the modern medical workup of metastatic spine tumors has become more common but has not been highly utilized in surgical planning. Potential utility of these genetic markers as surrogates for cancer behavior in current prognosis scoring systems and overall survival (OS) remains underexplored in existing literature. This study seeks to investigate the association of frequently identified tumor markers, EGFR, ALK, and PD-L1, in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to the spine with Tokuhashi prognosis scoring and OS.

METHODS

Patients with NSCLC metastasis to spine were identified through chart review. EGFR, ALK, and PD-L1 wild type vs. mutant type were identified from targeted chemotherapy genetic testing. Multiple linear regression was performed to assess gene profile contributions to Tokuhashi score. Cox Proportional Hazards models were generated for each tumor marker to assess the relationship between each marker and OS.

RESULTS

A total of 119 patients with NSCLC spine metastasis were identified. We employed a multiple linear regression analysis to investigate the influence of EGFR, ALK, and PD-L1 genotypes on the Tokuhashi score, revealing statistically significant relationships overall (p = 0.002). Individual genotype contributions include EGFR as a non-significant contributor (p = 0.269) and ALK and PD-L1 as significant contributors (p = 0.037 and p = 0.001 respectively). Overall survival was not significantly associated with tumor marker profiles through Kaplan-Meier analysis (p = 0.46) or by multivariable analysis (p = 0.108).

CONCLUSION

ALK and PD-L1 were significantly associated with Tokuhashi score while EGFR was not. Tumor markers alone were not predictive of OS. These findings indicate that genetic markers found in NSCLC metastases to the spine may demonstrate prognostic value. Therefore, employing standard tumor markers could enhance the identification of appropriate surgical candidates, although they demonstrate limited effectiveness in predicting overall survival.

Immunotherapy and Radiotherapy for Older Patients with Locally Advanced Non-Metastatic Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Who Are Not Candidates for or Decline Surgery and Chemotherapy: A Practical Proposal by the International Geriatric Radiotherapy Group

The standard of care for locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is either surgery combined with chemotherapy pre- or postoperatively or concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy. However, older and frail patients may not be candidates for surgery and chemotherapy due to the high mortality risk and are frequently referred to radiotherapy alone, which is better tolerated but carries a high risk of disease recurrence. Recently, immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) may induce a high response rate among cancer patients with positive programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression. Immunotherapy is also well tolerated among older patients. Laboratory and clinical studies have reported synergy between radiotherapy and ICI. The combination of ICI and radiotherapy may improve local control and survival for NSCLC patients who are not candidates for surgery and chemotherapy or decline these two modalities. The International Geriatric Radiotherapy Group proposes a protocol combining radiotherapy and immunotherapy based on the presence or absence of PD-L1 to optimize the survival of those patients.

Spatial intratumor heterogeneity of programmed death-ligand 1 expression predicts poor prognosis in resected non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

We quantified the pathological spatial intratumor heterogeneity of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression and investigated its relevance to patient outcomes in surgically resected non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC).

METHODS

This study enrolled 239 consecutive surgically resected NSCLC specimens of pathological stage IIA-IIIB. To characterize the spatial intratumor heterogeneity of PD-L1 expression in NSCLC tissues, we developed a mathematical model based on texture image analysis and determined the spatial heterogeneity index of PD-L1 for each tumor. The correlation between the spatial heterogeneity index of PD-L1 values and clinicopathological characteristics, including prognosis, was analyzed. Furthermore, an independent cohort of 70 cases was analyzed for model validation.

RESULTS

Clinicopathological analysis showed correlations between high spatial heterogeneity index of PD-L1 values and histological subtype (squamous cell carcinoma; P < .001) and vascular invasion (P = .004). Survival analysis revealed that patients with high spatial heterogeneity index of PD-L1 values presented a significantly worse recurrence-free rate than those with low spatial heterogeneity index of PD-L1 values (5-year recurrence-free survival [RFS] = 26.3% vs 47.1%, P < .005). The impact of spatial heterogeneity index of PD-L1 on cancer survival rates was verified through validation in an independent cohort. Additionally, high spatial heterogeneity index of PD-L1 values were associated with tumor recurrence in squamous cell carcinoma (5-year RFS = 29.2% vs 52.8%, P < .05) and adenocarcinoma (5-year RFS = 19.6% vs 43.0%, P < .01). Moreover, we demonstrated that a high spatial heterogeneity index of PD-L1 value was an independent risk factor for tumor recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

We presented an image analysis model to quantify the spatial intratumor heterogeneity of protein expression in tumor tissues. This model demonstrated that the spatial intratumor heterogeneity of PD-L1 expression in surgically resected NSCLC predicts poor patient outcomes.

Prognostic Impact of the Immune-Cell Infiltrate in N1-Positive Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

INTRODUCTION

The tumoral immune milieu plays a crucial role for the development of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and may influence individual prognosis. We analyzed the predictive role of immune cell infiltrates after curative lung cancer surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The tumoral immune-cell infiltrate from 174 patients with pN1 NSCLC and adjuvant chemotherapy was characterized using immunofluorescence staining. The density and distribution of specific immune cells in tumor center (TU), invasive front (IF) and normal tissue (NORM) were correlated with clinical parameters and survival data.

RESULTS

Tumor specific survival (TSS) of all patients was 69.9% at 5 years. The density of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) was higher in TU and IF than in NORM. High TIL density in TU (low vs. high: 62.0% vs. 86.7%; p = .011) and the presence of cytotoxic T-Lymphocytes (CTLs) in TU and IF were associated with improved TSS (positive vs. negative: 90.6% vs. 64.7% p = .024). High TIL-density correlated with programmed death-ligand 1 expression levels ≥50% (p < .001). Multivariate analysis identified accumulation of TIL (p = .016) and low Treg density (p = .003) in TU as negative prognostic predictors in squamous cell carcinoma (p = .025), whereas M1-like tumor- associated macrophages (p = .019) and high programmed death-ligand 1 status (p = .038) were associated with better survival in adenocarcinoma.

CONCLUSION

The assessment of specific intratumoral immune cells may serve as a prognostic predictor in pN1 NSCLC. However differences were observed related to adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma histology. Prospective assessment of the immune-cell infiltrate and further clarification of its prognostic relevance could assist patient selection for upcoming perioperative immunotherapies.

The combination of PD-L1 expression and the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio as a prognostic factor of postoperative recurrence in non-small-cell lung cancer: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

While PD-L1 expression and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) are prognostic biomarkers for lung cancer, few studies have considered their interaction. We hypothesized that the product of PD-L1 expression (tumor proportion score) and the NLR (PD-L1 × NLR) might be a postoperative prognostic marker reflecting the immune microenvironment of lung cancer.

METHODS

We analyzed the association between PD-L1 × NLR and postoperative recurrence-free survival in 647 patients with NSCLC using multivariable Cox proportional hazards models.

RESULTS

In the analysis of PD-L1 × NLR as a categorical variable, the group with PD-L1 × NLR ≥ 25.8 had a significantly higher hazard ratio (HR) than the group with < 25.8 (adjusted HR 1.78, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.23-2.60). The adjusted HR for PD-L1 × NLR, considered a continuous variable, was 1.004 (95% CI, 1.002-1.006). The risk of postoperative recurrence increased by 1.004-fold for each unit increase in PD-L1 × NLR, and a more than 2-fold increase in risk was observed for values ≥ 170.

CONCLUSIONS

PD-L1 × NLR may be used in real-world clinical practice as a novel factor for predicting the risk of postoperative recurrence after lung cancer surgery.

The prognostic and predictive roles of plasma C-reactive protein and PD-L1 in non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Anti-PD-(L)1 agents have revolutionized the treatment paradigms of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), while predictive biomarkers are limited. It has been previously shown that systemic inflammation, indicated by elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) level, is associated with a poor prognosis in anti-PD-(L)1 treated. The aim of the study was to analyze the prognostic and predictive value of CRP in addition to traditional prognostic and predictive markers and tumor PD-L1 score.

METHODS

We identified all NSCLC patients (n = 329) who had undergone PD-L1 tumor proportion score (TPS) analysis at Oulu University Hospital 2015-22. CRP levels, treatment history, immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy details, and survival were collected. The patients were categorized based on CRP levels (≤10 vs. >10) and PD-L1 TPS scores (<50 vs. ≥50).

RESULTS

In the whole cohort (n = 329), CRP level of ≤10 mg/L was associated with improved survival in univariate (HR 0.30, Cl 95% 0.22-0.41) and multivariate analyzes (HR 0.44, CI 95% 0.28-0.68). With ICI treated (n = 70), both CRP of ≤10 and PD-L1 TPS of ≥50 were associated with improved progression-free survival (PFS) in univariate (HR 0.51, CI 95% 0.27-0.96; HR 0.54, CI 95% 0.28-1.02) and multivariate (HR 0.48, CI 95% 0.26-0.90; HR 0.50, CI 95% 0.26-0.95) analyzes. The combination (PD-L1 TPS ≥50 and CRP >10) carried a high negative predictive value with a median PFS of 4.11 months (CI 95% 0.00-9.63), which was similar to patients with low PD-L1 (4.11 months, CI 95% 2.61-5.60).

CONCLUSIONS

Adding plasma CRP levels to PD-L1 TPS significantly increased the predictive value of sole PD-L1. Furthermore, patients with high CRP beard little benefit from anti-PD-(L)1 therapies independent of PD-L1 score. The study highlights the combined evaluation of plasma CRP and PD-L1 TPS as a negative predictive marker for ICI therapies.

PD-L1 Expression is not a Predictive Factor for Recurrence in Resected Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

PURPOSE

Although targeting programmed death-1 (PD-1) and its ligand, programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), is an established treatment modality for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the prognostic relevance of PD-L1 expression in NSCLC patients who undergo pulmonary resection is controversial.

METHODS

Two hundred thirty-seven NSCLC patients who underwent pulmonary resection were enrolled and the relationship between PD-L1 and various clinicopathological factors, as well as the prognostic relevance of PD-L1, was evaluated.

RESULTS

PD-L1 expression was significantly higher in male patients (p < 0.01), lymphatic invasion (p < 0.01), vascular invasion (p < 0.01), grade 3-4 differentiation (p < 0.01), squamous cell carcinoma (p < 0.01), and pathological stage > II (p < 0.01), but significantly lower in those who were epithelial growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation negative (p < 0.01). Relapse-free survival was significantly worse in patients with PD-L1 expression (p = 0.04). Univariate analysis showed that male sex (p = 0.04), carcinoembryonic antigen expression (CEA) (p < 0.01), maximum standardized uptake value (p < 0.01), lymphatic invasion (p < 0.01), vascular invasion (p < 0.01), grade 3-4 differentiation (p < 0.01), lower lobe disease (p = 0.04), PD-L1 expression (p = 0.03), and pathological stage (p < 0.01) were significant risk factors of recurrence. In multivariate analysis, CEA expression (p = 0.01), lymphatic invasion (p = 0.04), and pathological stage (p < 0.01) were risk factors for recurrence, whereas PD-L1 expression was not a significant factor of recurrence (p = 0.62).

CONCLUSION

PD-L1 expression was not a risk factor of recurrence but tumor progression tended to increase PD-L1 expression.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The Institutional Review Board of Kanazawa Medical University approved the protocol of this retrospective study (approval number: I392), and written informed consent was obtained from all patients.

Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy and Immunotherapy for Older Patients with Oligometastases: A Proposed Paradigm by the International Geriatric Radiotherapy Group

The standard of care for metastatic disease is systemic therapy. A unique subset of patients with limited metastatic disease defined as distant involvement of five anatomic sites or less (oligometastases) have a better chance of remission or improved survival and may benefit from local treatments such as surgery or stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). However, to prevent further spread of disease, systemic treatment such as chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and hormonal therapy may be required. Older patients (70 years old or above) or physiologically frail younger patients with multiple co-morbidities may not be able to tolerate the conventional chemotherapy due to its toxicity. In addition, those with a good performance status may not receive optimal chemotherapy due to concern about toxicity. Recently, immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors (CPI) has become a promising approach only in the management of program death ligand 1 (PD-L1)-positive tumors. Thus, a treatment method that elicits induction of PD-L1 production by tumor cells may allow all patients with oligometastases to benefit from immunotherapy. In vitro studies have demonstrated that high dose of radiotherapy may induce formation of PD-L1 in various tumors as a defense mechanism against inflammatory T cells. Clinical studies also corroborated those observations. Thus, SBRT, with its high precision to minimize damage to normal organs, may be a potential treatment of choice for older patients with oligometastases due to its synergy with immunotherapy. We propose a protocol combining SBRT to achieve a minimum radiobiologic equivalent dose around 59.5 Gy to all tumor sites if feasible, followed four to six weeks later by CPI for those cancer patients with oligometastases. All patients will be screened with frailty screening questionnaires to identify individuals at high risk for toxicity. The patients will be managed with an interdisciplinary team which includes oncologists, geriatricians, nurses, nutritionists, patient navigators, and social workers to manage all aspects of geriatric patient care. The use of telemedicine by the team may facilitate patient monitoring during treatment and follow-up. Preliminary data on toxicity, local control, survival, and progression-free survival may be obtained and serve as a template for future prospective studies.

Uncertain resection of highest mediastinal lymph node positive among pN2 non-small cell lung cancer patients: survival analysis of postoperative radiotherapy and driver gene mutations

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The role of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) in uncertain resection of pN2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with highest mediastinal lymph node positive has not been determined. We aim to evaluate the effect of PORT and driver gene mutation status (DGMS) on survival in such patients.

METHODS

140 selected patients were grouped according to whether they received PORT and their DGMS. Locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) of each group were evaluated by Kaplan-Meier analyses. COX regression was used to evaluate the effects of various factors on DFS and OS.

RESULTS

Of 140 patients, thirty-four patients (24.3%) received PORT, and forty (28.6%) had positive driver gene mutation status (DGp). PORT significantly prolonged LRFS (p = 0.002), DFS (p = 0.019) and OS (p = 0.02), but not DMFS (p = 0.062). By subgroup analysis, in patients with negative driver gene mutation status (DGn), those receiving PORT had notably longer LRFS (p = 0.022) and DFS (p = 0.033), but not DMFS (p = 0.060) or OS (p = 0.215), compared to those not receiving PORT. Cox analysis showed that the number of positive lymph nodes (PLNs) and administration of PORT were independent prognostic factors of DFS, and pathology, PLNs, and DGMS may be prognostic factors of OS (all p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Postoperative radiotherapy may improve locoregional recurrence-free and disease-free survival in patients with pN2 NSCLC with positive highest mediastinal lymph nodes, while driver gene mutation status impacted OS significantly. Only patients with positive driver gene mutations experienced significant overall survival benefits from postoperative radiotherapy.

SP142 evaluation contributes to the prediction of immune checkpoint inhibitor efficacy in non-small cell lung cancer with high PD-L1 expression assessed by 22C3

Background

It remains unclear whether assessing programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression by SP142 plus 22C3 adds value for predicting the response to immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods

This retrospective multicenter study included patients with advanced NSCLC treated with immune-checkpoint inhibitors. We constructed tissue microarrays (TMAs) and performed immunohistochemical staining with 22C3 and SP142 assays. We denoted the PD-L1 tumor proportion score (TPS) obtained from clinical medical records based on 22C3 staining as "22C3 (C)" and that obtained with 22C3 staining using our TMA as "22C3 (TMA)". SP142 staining was evaluated in both tumor cells and immune cells. We assessed the concordance between each PD-L1 assessment method and analyzed the objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) based on the PD-L1 expression level determined using the 22C3 and SP142 assays.

Results

In total, 288 patients were included. Among those with 22C3 (TMA) ≥50%, 60% of patients showed SP142 TC3 or IC3; among patients with 22C3 (C) <1%, 9% and 18% exhibited 22C3 (TMA) ≥1% and SP142 TC1/2/3 or IC1/2/3, respectively. Among patients with 22C3 (C) ≥50% treated with immune-checkpoint inhibitor monotherapy, the SP142 TC1/2/3 or IC1/2/3 group showed significantly better ORR, PFS and OS than the SP142 TC0 and IC0 group (54% vs. 29%, P=0.040, median =11.0 vs. 3.2 months, P=0.002, median =27.9 vs. 12.6 months, P=0.030, respectively). Multivariate analysis revealed that SP142 TC0 and IC0 was an independent unfavorable prognostic factor for PFS and OS in patients with 22C3 (C) ≥50% treated with immune-checkpoint inhibitor monotherapy. For those with 22C3 (C) ≥50% and SP142 TC0 and IC0, immune-checkpoint inhibitor concurrent with chemotherapy tended to result in a longer PFS and OS than immune-checkpoint inhibitor monotherapy (median =13.7 vs. 2.3 months, P=0.054, median = not estimable vs. 12.0 months, P=0.064, respectively).

Conclusions

SP142 evaluation contributes to the prediction of immune-checkpoint inhibitor efficacy in NSCLC with high PD-L1 expression assessed by 22C3.

Utility and Drawbacks of Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell (CAR-T) Therapy in Lung Cancer

The present treatments for lung cancer include surgical resection, radiation, chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy. Despite advances in therapies, the prognosis of lung cancer has not been substantially improved in recent years. Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell immunotherapy has attracted growing interest in the treatment of various malignancies. Despite CAR-T cell therapy emerging as a novel potential therapeutic option with promising results in refractory and relapsed leukemia, many challenges limit its therapeutic efficacy in solid tumors including lung cancer. In this landscape, studies have identified several obstacles to the effective use of CAR-T cell therapy including antigen heterogeneity, the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment, and tumor penetration by CAR-T cells. Here, we review CAR-T cell design; present the results of CAR-T cell therapies in preclinical and clinical studies in lung cancer; describe existing challenges and toxicities; and discuss strategies to improve therapeutic efficacy of CAR-T cells.

Various Uses of PD1/PD-L1 Inhibitor in Oncology: Opportunities and Challenges

The occurrence and development of cancer are closely related to the immune escape of tumor cells and immune tolerance. Unlike previous surgical, chemotherapy, radiotherapy and targeted therapy, tumor immunotherapy is a therapeutic strategy that uses various means to stimulate and enhance the immune function of the body, and ultimately achieves the goal of controlling tumor cells.With the in-depth understanding of tumor immune escape mechanism and tumor microenvironment, and the in-depth study of tumor immunotherapy, immune checkpoint inhibitors represented by Programmed Death 1/Programmed cell Death-Ligand 1(PD-1/PD-L1) inhibitors are becoming increasingly significant in cancer medication treatment. employ a variety of ways to avoid detection by the immune system, a single strategy is not more effective in overcoming tumor immune evasion and metastasis. Combining different immune agents or other drugs can effectively address situations where immunotherapy is not efficacious, thereby increasing the chances of success and alternative access to alternative immunotherapy. Immune combination therapies for cancer have become a hot topic in cancer treatment today. In this paper, several combination therapeutic modalities of PD1/PD-L1 inhibitors are systematically reviewed. Finally, an analysis and outlook are provided in the context of the recent advances in combination therapy with PD1/PD-L1 inhibitors and the pressing issues in this field.