The Treatment Effect of Liver Transplantation versus Liver Resection for HCC: A Review and Future Perspectives

Recent Trends in Liver Cancer: Epidemiology, Risk Factors, and Diagnostic Techniques

Liver cancer, particularly hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), poses a significant global health challenge due to its high mortality rate. Hepatocellular carcinoma and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) are the two main types of primary liver cancer (PLC), each with its own set of complexities. Secondary or metastatic liver cancer is more common than PLC. It is frequently observed in malignancies such as colorectal, pancreatic, melanoma, lung, and breast cancer. Liver cancer is often diagnosed at an advanced stage, making it difficult to treat. This highlights the need for focused research on early detection and effective treatment strategies. This review explores the epidemiology, risk factors, and diagnostic techniques for HCC. The development of HCC involves various risk factors, including chronic liver diseases, hepatitis B and C infections, alcohol consumption, obesity, smoking, and genetic predispositions. Various invasive and non-invasive diagnostic techniques, such as biopsy, liquid biopsy, and imaging modalities like ultrasonography, computed tomography scans (CT scans), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and positron emission tomography (PET) scans, are utilized for HCC detection and monitoring. Advances in imaging technology and biomarker research have led to more accurate and sensitive methods for early HCC detection. We also reviewed advanced research on emerging techniques, including next-generation sequencing, metabolomics, epigenetic biomarkers, and microbiome analysis, which show great potential for advancing early diagnosis and personalized treatment strategies. This literature review provides insights into the current state of liver cancer diagnosis and promising future advancements. Ongoing research and innovation in these areas are essential for improving early diagnosis and reducing the global burden of liver cancer.

Efficacy of associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) in hepatocellular carcinoma with macrovascular invasion: a single-center retrospective analysis

Objective The influence of macrovascular invasion on the therapeutic efficacy of Associating Liver Partition and Portal Vein Ligation for Staged Hepatectomy (ALPPS) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients has not been previously reported. This study primarily examines the therapeutic effect of ALPPS in treating HCC with macrovascular invasion. Methods 89 patients who underwent ALPPS at the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University from December 2016 to December 2021 were included. Patients were categorized into three groups based on macrovascular invasion status: pure HCC, HCC with portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT), and HCC with hepatic vein tumor thrombus (HVTT). Outcome measures such as postoperative complications, liver hyperplasia rates, and survival times were compared across the groups. Results The study comprised 44 patients without macrovascular invasion and 45 cases with it, including 37 PVTT and 8 HVTT cases. Patients with PVTT or HVTT had a higher rate of complications and liver failure after the first ALPPS stage compared to those without macrovascular invasion (P = 0.018, P = 0.036). This trend was also observed in the stratified analysis of severe complications. However, no significant differences were found in these outcomes after the second ALPPS stage among the groups. The volume and rate of future liver remnant proliferation between the two stages of ALPPS were not statistically different among the groups, with median overall survival times of 42, 39, and 33 months, and progression-free survival times of 30, 24, and 14 months, respectively (P = 0.412 and P = 0.281). Conclusion ALPPS for HCC with macrovascular invasion was considered safe, feasible, and effective, as it achieved therapeutic effects comparable to those in cases without macrovascular invasion.

Validation of Japanese indication criteria for deceased donor liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: Analysis of US national registry data

AIM

The Japanese indication criteria for liver transplantation (LT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have been updated based on living donor LT data to include either the Milan criteria (MC) or the 5-5-500 rule, which requires a nodule size of ≤5 cm, ≤5 nodules, and an alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) level ≤500 ng/mL. We aimed to validate the 5-5-500 rule and the MC for deceased donor LT (DDLT).

METHODS

Using national registry data from the United States from 2010 to 2014, we separated DDLT patients into four groups based on the MC and the 5-5-500 rule. The AFP values were stratified into categories: ≤100, 101-300, 301-500, and >500 ng/mL.

RESULTS

The 5-year survival rate was significantly lower for patients in the groups within MC/beyond 5-5-500 (56.3%) or beyond MC/5-5-500 (60.7%) than for patients in the groups within MC/5-5-500 (76.2%) and beyond MC/within 5-5-500 (72.3%) (p < 0.01). Hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence at 5 years was highest for the within MC/beyond 5-5-500 (25.4%) group, followed by the beyond MC/within 5-5-500 (13.1%), beyond MC/5-5-500 (9.6%), and within MC/5-5-500 (7.4%) groups. The stratified 5-year survival rates after DDLT were 76.5%, 72.4%, 58.4%, and 55.6% in the AFP ≤100, 101-300, 301-500, and >500 categories, respectively (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

The 5-5-500 rule guides the appropriate selection of patients with HCC for DDLT. Patients with AFP levels from 300 to 500 ng/mL had inferior outcomes even when they met the 5-5-500 rule, so further investigation is needed to guide their treatment.

Development and evaluation of nomograms and risk stratification systems to predict the overall survival and cancer-specific survival of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common type of primary liver cancer, and patients with HCC have a poor prognosis and low survival rates. Establishing a prognostic nomogram is important for predicting the survival of patients with HCC, as it helps to improve the patient's prognosis. This study aimed to develop and evaluate nomograms and risk stratification to predict overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) in HCC patients. Data from 10,302 patients with initially diagnosed HCC were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database between 2010 and 2017. Patients were randomly divided into the training and validation set. Kaplan-Meier survival, LASSO regression, and Cox regression analysis were conducted to select the predictors of OS. Competing risk analysis, LASSO regression, and Cox regression analysis were conducted to select the predictors of CSS. The validation of the nomograms was performed using the concordance index (C-index), the Akaike information criterion (AIC), the Bayesian information criterion (BIC), Net Reclassification Index (NRI), Discrimination Improvement (IDI), the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, calibration curves, and decision curve analyses (DCAs). The results indicated that factors including age, grade, T stage, N stage, M stage, surgery, surgery to lymph node (LN), Alpha-Fetal Protein (AFP), and tumor size were independent predictors of OS, whereas grade, T stage, surgery, AFP, tumor size, and distant lymph node metastasis were independent predictors of CSS. Based on these factors, predictive models were built and virtualized by nomograms. The C-index for predicting 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS were 0.788, 0.792, and 0.790. The C-index for predicting 1-, 3-, and 5-year CSS were 0.803, 0.808, and 0.806. AIC, BIC, NRI, and IDI suggested that nomograms had an excellent predictive performance with no significant overfitting. The calibration curves showed good consistency of OS and CSS between the actual observation and nomograms prediction, and the DCA showed great clinical usefulness of the nomograms. The risk stratification of OS and CSS was built that could perfectly classify HCC patients into three risk groups. Our study developed nomograms and a corresponding risk stratification system predicting the OS and CSS of HCC patients. These tools can assist in patient counseling and guiding treatment decision making.

Consensus on the tertiary prevention of primary liver cancer

To effectively prevent recurrence, improve the prognosis and increase the survival rate of primary liver cancer (PLC) patients with radical cure, the Chinese Society of Hepatology, Chinese Medical Association, invited clinical experts and methodologists to develop the Consensus on the Tertiary Prevention of Primary Liver Cancer, which was based on the clinical and scientific advances on the risk factors, histopathology, imaging finding, clinical manifestation, and prevention of recurrence of PLC. The purpose is to provide a current basis for the prevention, surveillance, early detection and diagnosis, and the effective measures of PLC recurrence.

Effects of stereotactic body radiotherapy for clinical outcomes of patients with liver metastasis and hepatocellular carcinoma: A retrospective study

This retrospective clinical study described the treatment efficacy and safety of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for patients of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and liver metastasis tumors. The therapeutic effect and prognosis of patients with liver cancer treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) at the Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center (Shanghai, China) between July 2011 and December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Overall survival (OS), local control (LC) rates and progression-free survival (PFS) were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier analysis and the log-rank test. Local progression was defined as tumor growth after SBRT on dynamic computed tomography follow-up. Treatment-related toxicities were assessed according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4. A total of 36 patients with liver cancer were enrolled in the present study. The prescribed dosages (14 Gy in 3 fractions or 16 Gy in 3 fractions) were applied for SBRT treatments. The median follow-up time was 21.4 months. The median OS time was 20.4 [95% confidence interval (CI): 6.6-34.2] months, and the 2-year OS rates for the total population, HCC group and liver metastasis group were 47.5, 73.3 and 34.2%, respectively. The median PFS time was 17.3 (95% CI: 11.8-22.8) months and the 2-year PFS rates for the total population, HCC group and liver metastasis group were 36.3, 44.0 and 31.4%, respectively. The 2-year LC rates for the total population, HCC group and liver metastasis group were 83.4, 85.7 and 81.6%, respectively. The most common grade IV toxicity for the HCC group was liver function impairment (15.4%), followed by thrombocytopenia (7.7%). There were no grade III/IV radiation pneumonia or digestive discomfort. The present study aimed to explore a safe, effective and non-invasive treatment method for liver tumors. At the same time, the innovation of the present study is to find a safe and effective prescription dose of SBRT in the absence of consensus on guidelines.

Long-term Outcomes of Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma Who Underwent Microwave Ablation after Downstaging with Transarterial Chemoembolization to Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer Stage A

PURPOSE

To compare the clinical results of microwave ablation (MWA) between patients downstaged to Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) Stage A with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and those initially classified as BCLC Stage A.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From January 2012 to May 2017, 1,087 patients were reviewed retrospectively using propensity score matching (1:1): 86 patients underwent MWA as a curative treatment after downstaging to BCLC Stage A by TACE (downstaging group) and 86 patients initially classified as BCLC Stage A underwent MWA (control group). The overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) between the 2 groups were compared.

RESULTS

The 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates were 95.3%, 79.1%, and 58.1%, respectively, in the downstaging group and 93.0%, 81.4%, and 61.6%, respectively, in the control group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.75; 95% CI, 0.50-1.13; P = .162). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year DFS rates were 80.2%, 50.0%, and 24.4%, respectively, in the downstaging group and 77.9%, 52.3%, and 27.9%, respectively, in the control group (HR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.76-1.53; P = .678). No significant differences were found in OS and DFS.

CONCLUSIONS

The long-term prognosis in patients with HCC who underwent MWA after downstaging to BCLC Stage A using TACE was similar to that in patients with initial BCLC Stage A.

Long‐term outcomes of living‐donor liver transplantation, hepatic resection, and local therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma with three <3‐cm nodules in a single institute

Background and Aim

Treatment for small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is determined based on the results of a liver function test and the tumor location and spread. The present study compared the outcomes among local therapy, hepatic resection (HR), and living‐donor liver transplantation (LDLT) for small HCC in a single institute.

Methods

We compared the overall survival, recurrence‐free survival, and cancer‐specific survival rates in patients with three HCC nodules <3 cm in size among local therapy, which included radiofrequency ablation (RFA), percutaneous ethanol injection (PEI), and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), and surgical treatment (HR and LDLT).

Results

One hundred and ninety‐seven patients with local therapy (109 RFA, 26 PEI, and 78 TACE), 107 with HR, and 66 with LDLT were enrolled in this study. There was no significant difference in OS among these groups. The recurrence‐free, cancer‐specific survival (CSS) of LDLT was superior to local therapy and HR. The prognostic factors for the survival were Child–Pugh (CP) Grade B and tumor marker for local therapy and multiple tumors and elevated ALT levels for HR.

Conclusions

For CP grade B patients with HCC of three <3‐cm nodule, LDLT could be considered because it resulted in better survival and CSS rates than local therapy.

A Practical Nomogram and Risk Stratification System Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients With Severe Liver Fibrosis

Objective

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. This study aims to construct a novel practical nomogram and risk stratification system to predict cancer-specific survival (CSS) in HCC patients with severe liver fibrosis.

Methods

Data on 1,878 HCC patients with severe liver fibrosis in the period 1975 to 2017 were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (SEER). Patients were block-randomized (1,316 training cohort, 562 validation cohort) by setting random seed. Univariate and multivariate COX regression analyses were employed to select variables for the nomogram. The consistency index (C-index), the area under time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curve (time-dependent AUC), and calibration curves were used to evaluate the performance of the nomogram. Decision curve analysis (DCA), the C-index, the net reclassification index (NRI), and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) were used to compare the nomogram with the AJCC tumor staging system. We also compared the risk stratification of the nomogram with the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system.

Results

Seven variables were selected to establish the nomogram. The C-index (training cohort: 0.781, 95%CI: 0.767–0.793; validation cohort: 0.793, 95%CI = 95%CI: 0.779–0.798) and the time-dependent AUCs (the training cohort: the values of 1-, 3-, and 5 years were 0.845, 0.835, and 0.842, respectively; the validation cohort: the values of 1-, 3-, and 5 years were 0.861, 0.870, and 0.876, respectively) showed satisfactory discrimination. The calibration plots also revealed that the nomogram was consistent with the actual observations. NRI (training cohort: 1-, 2-, and 3-year CSS: 0.42, 0.61, and 0.67; validation cohort: 1-, 2-, and 3-year CSS: 0.26, 0.52, and 0.72) and IDI (training cohort: 1-, 3-, and 5-year CSS:0.16, 0.20, and 0.22; validation cohort: 1-, 3-, and 5-year CSS: 0.17, 0.26, and 0.30) indicated that the established nomogram significantly outperformed the AJCC staging system (P < 0.001). Moreover, DCA also showed that the nomogram was more practical and had better recognition.

Conclusion

A nomogram for predicting CSS for HCC patients with severe liver fibrosis was established and validated, which provided a new system of risk stratification as a practical tool for individualized treatment and management.

Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma after Downstaging or Bridging Therapy with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

Liver transplantation offers excellent outcomes for patients with HCC. For those who initially present within the Milan criteria, bridging therapy is essential to control disease while awaiting liver transplant. For those who present beyond the Milan criteria, a liver transplant may still be considered following successful downstaging. Since the introduction of atezolizumab as part of the first-line treatment for HCC in 2020, there has been increasing interest in the use of ICIs as bridging or downstaging therapies prior to liver transplant. A total of six case reports/series have been published on this topic, with mixed outcomes. Overall, liver transplantation can be performed safely following prolonged ICI use, though ICIs may increase the risk of fulminant acute rejection early in the post-operative period. A minimal washout period between the last dose of ICI and liver transplantation has been identified as an important factor predicting transplant outcomes; however, further research is needed.