The Emerging Role of Circulating Tumor DNA in the Management of Breast Cancer

CRISPR/Cas12a Corona Nanomachine for Detecting Circulating Tumor Nucleic Acids in Serum

Circulating tumor nucleic acids (CTNAs), which consist of cell-free DNA or RNA released from tumor cells, are utilized as potential biomarkers for diagnosing and managing tumor prognosis. There is a significant demand for developing a highly sensitive and reliable assay for CTNAs detection. In this study, we engineered a CRISPR/Cas12a corona nanomachine capable of detecting circulating tumor DNA and RNA in serum. This nanomachine consists of a protein shell incorporating Cas12a/crRNA ribonucleoprotein complexes and a scaffold AuNP core decorated with substrate ssDNA strands. The protective CRISPR corona shields the nucleic acid core from degradation by nuclease DNase/RNase, thereby enhancing the stability of the CRISPR/Cas12a corona nanomachine in biological fluids, even tolerating up to undiluted human serum and FBS. Upon encountering target CTNAs, the CRISPR/Cas12a is activated through the sequence-specific hybridization between crRNA and CTNAs. Subsequently, the activated CRISPR/Cas12a autonomously cleaves the collateral ssDNA substrates on AuNPs, releasing the fluorophore-labeled fragment and generating an increasing fluorescent signal. The CRISPR corona nanomachine was successfully employed to detect various CTNAs, including circulating tumor (ct)DNA/RNA (EGFR L858R) and microRNA-21, achieving a limit of detection of 0.14 pM for ctDNA and 1.0 pM for RNA. This CRISPR corona nanomachine enables simultaneous detection of both DNA and RNA in complex biological samples, offering a promising tool for early diagnosis.

Liquid Biopsy in the Clinical Management of Cancers

Liquid biopsy, a noninvasive diagnosis that examines circulating tumor components in body fluids, is increasingly used in cancer management. An overview of relevant literature emphasizes the current state of liquid biopsy applications in cancer care. Biomarkers in liquid biopsy, particularly circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), circulating tumor RNAs (ctRNA), circulating tumor cells (CTCs), extracellular vesicles (EVs), and other components, offer promising opportunities for early cancer diagnosis, treatment selection, monitoring, and disease assessment. The implementation of liquid biopsy in precision medicine has shown significant potential in various cancer types, including lung cancer, colorectal cancer, breast cancer, and prostate cancer. Advances in genomic and molecular technologies such as next-generation sequencing (NGS) and digital polymerase chain reaction (dPCR) have expanded the utility of liquid biopsy, enabling the detection of somatic variants and actionable genomic alterations in tumors. Liquid biopsy has also demonstrated utility in predicting treatment responses, monitoring minimal residual disease (MRD), and assessing tumor heterogeneity. Nevertheless, standardizing liquid biopsy techniques, interpreting results, and integrating them into the clinical routine remain as challenges. Despite these challenges, liquid biopsy has significant clinical implications in cancer management, offering a dynamic and noninvasive approach to understanding tumor biology and guiding personalized treatment strategies.

Differentiating Primary and Recurrent Lesions in Patients with a History of Breast Cancer: A Comprehensive Review

Breast cancer (BC) recurrence remains a concerning issue, requiring accurate identification and differentiation from primary lesions for optimal patient management. This comprehensive review aims to summarize and evaluate the current evidence on methods to distinguish primary breast tumors from recurrent lesions in patients with a history of BC. Also, we provide a comprehensive understanding of the different imaging techniques, including mammography, ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission tomography, highlighting their diagnostic accuracy, limitations, and potential integration. In addition, the role of various biopsy modalities and molecular markers was explored. Furthermore, the potential role of liquid biopsy, circulating tumor cells, and circulating tumor DNA in differentiating between primary and recurrent BC was emphasized. Finally, it addresses emerging diagnostic modalities, such as radiomic analysis and artificial intelligence, which show promising potential in enhancing diagnostic accuracy. Through comprehensive analysis and review of the available literature, the current study provides an up-to-date understanding of the current state of knowledge, challenges, and future directions in accurately distinguishing between primary and recurrent breast lesions in patients with a history of BC.

Biomarker-specific biosensors revolutionise breast cancer diagnosis

Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women across the globe. In order to treat breast cancer successfully, it is crucial to conduct a comprehensive assessment of the condition during its initial stages. Although mammogram screening has long been a common method of breast cancer screening, high rates of type I error and type II error results as well as radiation exposure have always been of concern. The outgrowth cancer mortality rate is primarily due to delayed diagnosis, which occurs most frequently in a metastatic III or IV stage, resulting in a poor prognosis after therapy. Traditional detection techniques require identifying carcinogenic properties of cells, such as DNA or RNA alterations, conformational changes and overexpression of certain proteins, and cell shape, which are referred to as biomarkers or analytes. These procedures are complex, long-drawn-out, and expensive. Biosensors have recently acquired appeal as low-cost, simple, and super sensitive detection methods for analysis. The biosensor approach requires the existence of biomarkers in the sample. Thus, the development of novel molecular markers for diverse forms of cancer is a rising complementary affair. These biosensor devices offer two major advantages: (1) a tiny amount of blood collected from the patient is sufficient for analysis, and (2) it could help clinicians swiftly select and decide on the best therapy routine for the individual. This review will include updates on prospective cancer markers and biosensors in cancer diagnosis, as well as the associated detection limitations, with a focus on biosensor development for marker detection.

Incorporating clinicopathological and molecular risk prediction tools to improve outcomes in early HR+/HER2- breast cancer

Stratification of recurrence risk is a cornerstone of early breast cancer diagnosis that informs a patient's optimal treatment pathway. Several tools exist that combine clinicopathological and molecular information, including multigene assays, which can estimate risk of recurrence and quantify the potential benefit of different adjuvant treatment modalities. While the tools endorsed by treatment guidelines are supported by level I and II evidence and provide similar prognostic accuracy at the population level, they can yield discordant risk prediction at the individual patient level. This review examines the evidence for these tools in clinical practice and offers a perspective of potential future risk stratification strategies. Experience from clinical trials with cyclin D kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors in the setting of hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) early breast cancer is provided as an illustrative example of risk stratification.

Circulating Tumor DNA as a Novel Biomarker Optimizing Treatment for Triple Negative Breast Cancer

Triple-negative breast cancer is a sub-type of clinically and molecularly heterogeneous malignant disease with a worse prognosis and earlier recurrence than HER2-amplified or hormone-receptor positive breast cancer. Because of the lack of personalized therapy, genetic information is essential to early diagnosing, identifying the high risk of recurrence, guiding therapeutic management, and monitoring treatment efficiency. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is a novel noninvasive, timely, and tumor specified biomarker that reliably reflects the comprehensive tumor genetic profiles. Thus, it holds significant expectations in personalized therapy, including accurate diagnosis, treatment monitoring, and early detection of recurrence of TNBC. In this review, we summarize the results from recent and ongoing ctDNA-based biomarker-driven clinical trials, with respect to ctDNA analysis' predictive role, in adjuvant, neo-adjuvant, and metastatic settings. Collectively, we anticipate that ctDNA will ultimately be integrated into the management of TNBC to foster precise treatment.

Circulating Tumor Cells: From the Laboratory to the Cancer Clinic; A Closing Comment

Cancer recurrence not only shortens the life span of cancer patients, but also leads to a decrease in QOL, so it needs to be controlled [...].

Integrative analysis of multi-omics data for liquid biopsy

The innovation of liquid biopsy holds great potential to revolutionise cancer management through early diagnosis and timely treatment of cancer. Integrative analysis of different tumour-derived omics data (such as genomics, epigenetics, fragmentomics, and proteomics) from body fluids for cancer detection and monitoring could outperform the analysis of single modality data alone. In this review, we focussed on the discussion of early cancer detection and molecular residual disease surveillance based on multi-omics data of blood. We summarised diverse types of tumour-derived components, current popular platforms for profiling cancer-associated signals, machine learning approaches for joint analysis of liquid biopsy data, as well as multi-omics-based early detection of cancers, molecular residual disease monitoring, and treatment response surveillance. We also discussed the challenges and future directions of multi-omics-based liquid biopsy. With the development of both experimental protocols and computational methods dedicated to liquid biopsy, the implementation of multi-omics strategies into the clinical workflow will likely benefit the clinical management of cancers including decision-making guidance and patient outcome improvement.

Database Mining Detected a Cuproptosis-Related Prognostic Signature and a Related Regulatory Axis in Breast Cancer

Background

Breast cancer is the frequent cause of disease burden related to cancer among women. It affects one in 20 women globally and up to one in eight women in high-income countries. Cuproptosis is a copper-induced modality of mitochondrial cell death that is involved in tumor proliferation and metastasis.

Methods

To construct a prognostic cuproptosis-related signature, LASSO Cox regression analysis was employed. Additionally, ceRNA was developed with an aim of exploring the possible lncRNA-miRNA-mRNA regulatory axis in breast cancer.

Results

The expression of FDX1, DLD, DLAT, LIAS, LIPT1, GLS MTF1, and PDHA1 was downregulated, while CDKN2A expression level was elevated in breast cancer in contrast with normal tissue. We furthermore reviewed the genetic mutation landscape of genes linked to cuproptosis in breast cancer. Prognosis analysis revealed poor OS and RFS rates in breast cancer patients with elevated levels of CDKN2A and PDHA1 and low levels of MTF1, DLD, LIPT1, and FDX1. We then constructed a cuproptosis-related signature with six genes (DKN2A, MTF1, PDHA1, DLD, LIPT1, and FDX1) for breast cancer, which predicted the OS rate with an accuracy that ranged from medium to high. Further analysis demonstrated a significant correlation between the cuproptosis-related prognostic signature and pTNM stage, MSI score, drug sensitivity, TMB score, and immune cell infiltration. Moreover, we identified the lncRNA XIST/miR-92b-3p/MTF1 regulatory axis for breast cancer.

Conclusion

Multiomics approaches were used to create a cuproptosis-related signature with six genes (DKN2A, MTF1, PDHA1, DLD, LIPT1, and FDX1) for breast cancer. We discovered the lncRNA XIST/miR-92b-3p/MTF1 regulatory axis for breast cancer, which has not yet been investigated previously.

Integrated Bioinformatics Analysis for the Screening of Hub Genes and Therapeutic Drugs in Androgen Receptor-Positive TNBC

As the most invasive and lethal subtype of breast cancer (BC), triple-negative breast carcinoma (TNBC) is of increasing interest. However, the androgen receptor (AR) still has an unclear role in TNBC. The current study is aimed at testing the diagnostic and therapeutic performance of novel biomarkers for AR-positive TNBC. The GSE76124 dataset was analyzed by combining WGCNA and other bioinformatics methods. Subsequently, function enrichment analysis was applied to identify the relationships between these differential expression genes (DEGs). Subsequently, the protein-protein interaction network was established, and the hub genes were identified by Cytoscape software. Eventually, the miRNA-hub gene modulate network was developed and the Drug-Gene Interaction Database (DGIdb) was applied to verify the potential drugs for AR-positive TNBC. In the current research, 88 DEGs in total were selected from the intersection of the purple module genes identified by WGCNA and limma package. TFF1, FOXA1, ESR1, AGR2, TFF3, AGR3, GATA3, XBP1, SPDEF, and TOX3 were selected as hub genes by the MCC method, which were all upregulated. The survival analysis suggested that TFF1 was the only one related to significant lower survival rate in TNBC. Ultimately, hsa-miR-520g-3p and hsa-miR-520h were found taking part in the regulation of TFF1, and 2 small molecules were identified as the potential targets for AR-positive TNBC treatment. As a result, our study suggested that hsa-miR-520g-3p, hsa-miR-520h, and TFF1 might have significant potential values for AR-positive TNBC diagnosis and prognosis prediction. TFF1, hsa-miR-520g-3, and hsa-miR-520h may serve as the novel therapeutic targets, and our findings offer further insights into the therapy of AR-positive TNBC.

Predictive Biomarkers of Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer: Current and Future Perspectives for Precision Medicine

Pathological complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with early breast cancer is correlated with better survival. Meanwhile, an expanding arsenal of post-neoadjuvant treatment strategies have proven beneficial in the absence of pCR, leading to an increased use of neoadjuvant systemic therapy in patients with early breast cancer and the search for predictive biomarkers of response. The better prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy could enable the escalation or de-escalation of neoadjuvant treatment strategies, with the ultimate goal of improving the clinical management of early breast cancer. Clinico-pathological prognostic factors are currently used to estimate the potential benefit of neoadjuvant systemic treatment but are not accurate enough to allow for personalized response prediction. Other factors have recently been proposed but are not yet implementable in daily clinical practice or remain of limited utility due to the intertumoral heterogeneity of breast cancer. In this review, we describe the current knowledge about predictive factors for response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients and highlight the future perspectives that could lead to the better prediction of response, focusing on the current biomarkers used for clinical decision making and the different gene signatures that have recently been proposed for patient stratification and the prediction of response to therapies. We also discuss the intratumoral phenotypic heterogeneity in breast cancers as well as the emerging techniques and relevant pre-clinical models that could integrate this biological factor currently limiting the reliable prediction of response to neoadjuvant systemic therapy.

Potential utility of miRNAs for liquid biopsy in breast cancer

Breast cancer (BC) remains the most prevalent malignancy due to its incidence rate, recurrence, and metastasis in women. Conventional strategies of cancer detection– mammography and tissue biopsy lack the capacity to detect the complete cancer genomic landscape. Besides, they often give false- positive or negative results. The presence of this and other disadvantages such as invasiveness, high-cost, and side effects necessitates developing new strategies to overcome the BC burden. Liquid biopsy (LB) has been brought to the fore owing to its early detection, screening, prognosis, simplicity of the technique, and efficient monitoring. Remarkably, microRNAs (miRNAs)– gene expression regulators seem to play a major role as biomarkers detected in the samples of LB. Particularly, miR-21 and miR-155 among other possible candidates seem to serve as favorable biomarkers in the diagnosis and prognosis of BC. Hence, this review will assess the potential utility of miRNAs as biomarkers and will highlight certain promising candidates for the LB approach in the diagnosis and management of BC that may optimize the patient outcome.

Circulating tumor DNA for breast cancer: Review of active clinical trials

BACKGROUND

The new diagnostic concept of liquid biopsy is based on the analysis of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and cell-free DNA (ctDNA). In addition to providing a more comprehensive view of the tumor characteristics including molecular variations, ctDNA analysis through liquid biopsies may also allow for a non-invasive, rapid, and cost-effective identification of biomarkers for tumor detection and monitoring of tumor progression.

OBJECTIVE

In this review, we summarize key active clinical trial studies involving utilization of ctDNA derived from liquid biopsy in the early and metastatic breast cancer setting. With this, we also provide a brief overview of the potential future implementations of the LB technology and outlining how ctDNA analysis needs to be standardized through the performance of similar clinical studies.

METHODS

A review was conducted on Clinicaltrials.gov to identify active trials related to use of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) for breast cancer. Search terms included "breast cancer," "liquid biopsy," and "ctDNA."

CONCLUSION

While LB is gaining traction in many cancer settings, its use in BC is still early and warrants more investigation in breast cancer diagnostic and treatment settings, including early detection of disease recurrence.

Changes of Tumor Markers in Patients with Breast Cancer during Postoperative Adjuvant Chemotherapy

Objective

Serum tumor marker (STM) elevation can detect metastasis earlier than imaging diagnosis and, although not recommended by guidelines, is still widely used in clinical practice for postoperative follow-up of breast cancer patients. The purpose of this study was to investigate the change rules of CEA and CA153 in patients with HER2-negative breast cancer during postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy and their influencing factors.

Materials and Methods

The medical records of patients with HER2-negative early breast cancer who visited Xuanwu Hospital from September 2018 to June 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Demographic characteristics and baseline data of CEA and CA153 at initial diagnosis were collected. Data of CEA, CA153, biochemistry (including ALT, AST, rGT, triglycerides, cholesterol, and blood glucose) and blood routine (including white blood cells, neutrophils, monocytes, lymphocytes, and platelets) were also collected before chemotherapy, at the end of chemotherapy and more than 3 months after the end of chemotherapy. LY/MONO, NEUT/LY, PLT/LY, and systemic immune inflammation index (SII) were calculated and statistically analyzed using SPSSAU software.

Results

A total of 90 patients were enrolled, all of whom were female, with a mean age of 55.11 ± 10.60 y. The value of CEA at initial diagnosis was 2.10 ± 1.11 ng/mL, and high expression was mostly correlated with past history of chronic diseases and tumor lymph node metastasis; the value of CA153 was 11.80 ± 6.60 U/mL, and high expression was correlated with high SII at initial diagnosis. Surgery did not affect the values of serum CEA and CA153. At the end of chemotherapy, CEA and CA153 were 2.68 ± 1.34 ng/mL and 18.51 ± 8.50 U/mL, respectively, which were significantly increased compared with those before chemotherapy, and were linearly correlated with the values before chemotherapy. They decreased (CEA 2.45 ± 1.19 ng/mL, CA153 10.87 ± 5.96 U/mL) again three months after the end of chemotherapy, manifested as "spiking" phenomenon, which was associated with lymph node metastasis at diagnosis, body metabolic disorders, and chronic inflammatory status.

Conclusion

CEA and CA153 were increased presenting as "spiking" phenomena in patients with early HER2-negative breast cancer during postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy, and the peak of increase was linearly correlated with the indicators before chemotherapy. Clinical attention should be paid to this change to avoid excessive diagnosis and treatment leading to medical resource consumption.

Electric field-assisted MnO2 nanomaterials for rapid capture and in situ delivery of circulating tumour cells

The heterogeneity of cancer has become a major obstacle to treatment, and the development of an efficient, fast, and accurate drug delivery system is even more urgent. In this work, we designed a device that integrated multiple functions of cell capture, in situ manipulation, and non-destructive release on a single device. With an applied electric field, an intelligent device based on MnO₂ nanomaterials was used to realize efficient and rapid capture of cancer cells in both patients' blood and artificial blood samples. This device could capture cancer cells with high efficiency (up to about 93%) and strong specificity in blood samples, the capture time was nearly 50 min faster than that of natural sedimentation, and reduce the effects on cells caused by long-time in vitro culture. In addition, Mn³⁺ on the surface of the MnO₂ substrate was reduced to Mn²⁺ by an electrochemical method, partial dissolution occurred, and then the captured cells were non-destructively released with rapid speed (about 8 s) and high efficiency (about 94 ± 2%). For in situ regulation, upon applying a pulse electric field, the captured cells were perforated nondestructively, and extracellular molecules could be delivered to the captured cells with well-performed dose and temporal controls. As a proof-of-concept application, we proved that the device could capture circulating tumor cells in peripheral blood faster and achieve in situ drug delivery. Finally, it can also quickly release circulating tumour cells for subsequent analysis, highlighting its accuracy, due to which it is widely used in medical treatment, basic tumor research and drug development.

Current and Developing Liquid Biopsy Techniques for Breast Cancer

Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer and leading cause of cancer mortality among woman worldwide. The techniques of diagnosis, prognosis, and therapy monitoring of breast cancer are critical. Current diagnostic techniques are mammography and tissue biopsy; however, they have limitations. With the development of novel techniques, such as personalized medicine and genetic profiling, liquid biopsy is emerging as the less invasive tool for diagnosing and monitoring breast cancer. Liquid biopsy is performed by sampling biofluids and extracting tumor components, such as circulating tumor cells (CTCs), circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), cell-free mRNA (cfRNA) and microRNA (miRNA), proteins, and extracellular vehicles (EVs). In this review, we summarize and focus on the recent discoveries of tumor components and biomarkers applied in liquid biopsy and novel development of detection techniques, such as surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS) and microfluidic devices.