Histopathological and Molecular Profiling of Clear Cell Sarcoma and Correlation with Response to Crizotinib: An Exploratory Study Related to EORTC 90101 "CREATE" Trial

Functional genomics of human clear cell sarcoma: genomic, transcriptomic and chemical biology landscape for clear cell sarcoma

BACKGROUND

Systemic therapy for metastatic clear cell sarcoma (CCS) bearing EWSR1-CREB1/ATF1 fusions remains an unmet clinical need in children, adolescents, and young adults.

METHODS

To identify key signaling pathway vulnerabilities in CCS, a multi-pronged approach was taken: (i) genomic and transcriptomic landscape analysis, (ii) integrated chemical biology interrogations, (iii) development of CREB1/ATF1 inhibitors, and (iv) antibody-drug conjugate testing (ADC). The first approach encompassed DNA exome and RNA deep sequencing of the largest human CCS cohort yet reported consisting of 47 patient tumor samples and 8 cell lines.

RESULTS

Sequencing revealed recurrent mutations in cell cycle checkpoint, DNA double-strand break repair or DNA mismatch repair genes, with a correspondingly low to intermediate tumor mutational burden. DNA multi-copy gains with corresponding high RNA expression were observed in CCS tumor subsets. CCS cell lines responded to the HER3 ADC patritumab deruxtecan in a dose-dependent manner in vitro, with impaired long term cell viability.

CONCLUSION

These studies of the genomic, transcriptomic and chemical biology landscape represent a resource 'atlas' for the field of CCS investigation and drug development. CHK inhibitors are identified as having potential relevance, CREB1 inhibitors non-dependence of CCS on CREB1 activity was established, and the potential utility of HER3 ADC being used in CCS is found.

Primary Clear Cell Sarcoma of Bone: Clinicopathologic Study of a Rare Presentation

Clear cell sarcoma (CCS) is an uncommon malignant mesenchymal neoplasm of young adults with a predilection for tendons and aponeuroses of distal extremities, a distinctive nested growth pattern, melanocytic differentiation, and usually an EWSR1::ATF1 fusion. Distinction from melanoma can be challenging but is critical for clinical management. Rare cases of primary bone CCS have been reported. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinicopathologic features of a series of primary bone CCS. Three cases of primary bone CCS were identified out of 140 CCS diagnosed between 2010 and 2021. Two patients were female, and 1 patient was male; ages were 19, 47, and 61 years. All tumors arose in the long bones of the extremities (femur, humerus, fibula). Two tumors also involved regional lymph nodes at presentation. Two showed characteristic histologic features, in the form of nests and fascicles of uniform epithelioid to spindle cells with prominent nucleoli and pale eosinophilic to clear cytoplasm; 1 tumor showed sheet-like growth, unusual focal pleomorphism, and more notable nuclear atypia. By immunohistochemistry, S100 protein was positive in 2/3 cases, SOX10 in 3/3, HMB-45 in 2/3, MiTF in 2/2, and melan A in 1/3. All cases were confirmed to harbor EWSR1 rearrangement and EWSR1::ATF1 fusion or t(12;22). On follow-up, all 3 patients developed metastases and died of disease, 5, 18, and 21 months after diagnosis. In summary, CCS rarely presents in the skeleton. At such locations, distinction from metastatic melanoma is particularly challenging. Clinical and pathologic features are similar to conventional CCS of soft tissue. Primary bone CCS may pursue an aggressive clinical course.

Clear cell sarcoma: state-of-the art and perspectives

INTRODUCTION

Clear cell sarcoma (CCS) is an ultrarare soft tissue sarcoma (STS) with a poor prognosis due to its propensity to metastasize and its low chemosensitivity. The standard treatment of localized CCS consists of wide surgical excision with or without additive radiotherapy. However, unresectable CCS is generally treated with conventional systemic therapies available for treatment of STS despite the weak scientific evidence to support its use.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, we discuss the clinicopathologic characteristics of CSS, as well as the current treatment landscape and future therapeutic approaches.

EXPERT OPINION

The current treatment strategy of advanced CCSs, based on STSs regimens, shows a lack of effective options. Combination therapiesin particular, the association of immunotherapy and TKIs, represent a promising approach. Translational studies are needed in order to decipher the regulatory mechanisms involved in the oncogenesis of this ultrarare sarcoma and identify potential molecular targets.

EWSR1-TFCP2 in an adolescent represents an extremely rare and aggressive form of intraosseous spindle cell rhabdomyosarcomas

The WHO Classification of Tumors of Soft Tissue and Bone subdivides rhabdomyosarcomas (RMS) into alveolar, embryonal, pleomorphic, and spindle cell RMS. Advances in molecular genetic diagnostics have made it possible to identify new RMS subgroups within traditional morphological entities. One of these subgroups comprises rare tumors characterized by epithelioid and spindle cell morphology, highly aggressive clinical course with pronounced tendency to intraosseous growth, and the presence of pathognomonic recurring genetic aberrations- chimeric genes/transcripts EWSR1::TFCP2, FUS::TFCP2, or MEIS1::NCOA2. Starting from 2018, only 26 reported cases of RMS have been assigned to this subgroup. The rarity of such tumors hampers their correct diagnostics for both anatomic pathologists and molecular oncologists. Here we describe a clinical case of intraosseous spindle cell RMS expressing EWSR1::TFCP2 fusion gene, encountered for the first time in our practice, in a 16-year-old female patient presenting with mandibular lesion. The diagnostic process took considerable time and involved RNA sequencing; a high-throughput method of molecular genetic research. The tumor was extremely aggressive, showing resistance to polychemotherapy, radiation therapy, and crizotinib targeted therapy, with the fatal outcome.

Systemic treatment of advanced clear cell sarcoma: results from a retrospective international series from the World Sarcoma Network

Background

Clear cell sarcoma (CCS) is a translocated aggressive malignancy with a high incidence of metastases and poor prognosis. There are few studies describing the activity of systemic therapy in CCS. We report a multi-institutional retrospective study of the outcomes of patients with advanced CCS treated with systemic therapy within the World Sarcoma Network (WSN).

Materials and methods

Patients with molecularly confirmed locally advanced or metastatic CCS treated with systemic therapy from June 1985 to May 2021 were included. Baseline demographic and treatment information, including response by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) 1.1, was retrospectively collected by local investigators. Descriptive statistics were carried out.

Results

Fifty-five patients from 10 institutions were included. At diagnosis, the median age was 30 (15-73) years and 24% (n = 13/55) had metastatic disease. The median age at diagnosis was 30 (15-73) years. Most primary tumours were at aponeurosis (n = 9/55, 16%) or non-aponeurosis limb sites (n = 17/55, 31%). The most common fusion was EWSR1–ATF1 (n = 24/55, 44%). The median number of systemic therapies was 1 (range 1-7). The best response rate was seen for patients treated with sunitinib (30%, n = 3/10), with a median progression-free survival of 4 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1-7] months. The median overall survival for patients with advanced/metastatic disease was 15 months (95% CI 3-27 months).

Conclusions

Soft tissue sarcoma-type systemic therapies have limited benefit in advanced CCS and response rate was poor. International, multicentre prospective translational studies are required to identify new treatments for this ultra-rare subtype, and access to early clinical trial enrolment remains key for patients with CCS.

•

This is the largest reported series of advanced CCS patients treated with systemic therapy.

•

The activity of sarcoma-type systemic therapy is poor and modest responses were seen only with sunitinib.

•

Effective therapies are needed to improve outcomes for patients with this ultra-rare sarcoma type.