Intention to Inform Relatives, Rates of Cascade Testing, and Preference for Patient-Mediated Communication in Families Concerned with Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer and Lynch Syndrome: The Swiss CASCADE Cohort

Impact of the American Society of Breast Surgeons' Guidelines on Genetic Testing and Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy Rates

BACKGROUND

It is unclear whether the American Society of Breast Surgeons' (ASBrS) guideline to offer genetic testing (GT) to all patients with breast cancer (BC) impacted contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) rates. We sought to describe the trends of GT and CPM rates and to determine predictors of CPM uptake.

METHODS

After retrospective review of two prospectively maintained institutional databases, we identified patients with unilateral stage 0-III BC who underwent surgery between January 2016 and July 2020. Trends in GT and CPM rates were described and multivariable logistic regression determined factors associated with CPM utilization.

RESULTS

Among 6062 women identified, 3242 (53.4%) had GT. From January 2016 to July 2020, GT rates increased significantly from 46.3% to 70.1% (p < 0.001), but were not impacted by release of the guidelines. The proportion of pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants (PVs) detected in BC-related genes did not change significantly (p = 0.115). Overall, 782/6062 (12.9%) patients underwent CPM. There was no significant change in the CPM rate (p = 0.527), including before (p =0.298) and after (p = 0.220) guideline release. The factors significantly associated with increased CPM rates were PVs in a BC-related gene, increasing number of relatives with BC, first-degree relative with ovarian cancer, younger age, and cT2-3 tumors (all p < 0.05). Conversely, GT alone did not impact CPM (adjusted odds ratio 1.152, 95% confidence interval 0.85-1.55; p = 0.350 untested compared with GT with negative results).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite increasing GT rates, CPM rates were stable over time and were not associated with GT, indicating that offering GT to more patients does not necessarily increase CPM rates.

How is Value Defined in Molecular Testing in Cancer? A Scoping Review

OBJECTIVE

To identify how value is defined in studies that focus on the value of molecular testing in cancer and the extent to which broadening the conceptualisation of value in healthcare has been applied in the molecular testing literature.

METHODS

A scoping review was undertaken using Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) guidance. Medline, Embase, EconLit and Cochrane Library were searched in August 2023. Articles were eligible if they reported costs relative to outcomes, novel costs, or novel outcomes of molecular testing in cancer. Results were synthesised and qualitative content analysis was performed with deductive and inductive frameworks.

RESULTS

Ninety-one articles were included in the review. The majority (75/91) were conventional economic analyses (comparative economic evaluations and budget impact assessments) and undertaken from a healthcare system perspective (38/91). Clinical outcomes dominate the assessment of value (61/91), with quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) the most common outcome measure (45/91). Other definitions of value were diverse (e.g. psychological impact, access to trials), inconsistent, and largely not in keeping with evolving guidance.

CONCLUSIONS

Broader concepts of value were not commonly described in the molecular testing literature focusing on cancer. Conventional approaches to measuring the health costs and outcomes of molecular testing in cancer prevail with little focus on non-clinical elements of value. There are emerging reports of non-clinical outcomes of testing information, particularly psychological consequences. Intrinsic attributes of the testing process and preferences of those who receive testing information may determine the realised societal value of molecular testing and highlight challenges to implementing such a value framework.

Ethical and Psychosocial Issues Associated with Genetic Testing for Hereditary Tumor Predisposition Syndromes

Hereditary tumor predisposition syndromes (HTPSs) significantly increase the risk of developing various cancers, often at earlier ages than seen in the general population. The development and application of next-generation sequencing (NGS) has revolutionized the identification of individuals with HTPS, facilitating early diagnosis, personalized risk assessment, and tailored preventive strategies. However, the widespread implementation of genetic testing for HTPS presents complex ethical and psychosocial issues. This paper examines key ethical considerations surrounding genetic testing for HTPS, including the following: the distinct nature of genetic information and its implications for families; the challenges of informed consent amidst evolving genetic knowledge and direct-to-consumer testing; the complexities of predictive and presymptomatic testing, particularly in minors; and the implications of incidental findings. It further explores the critical issue of genetic discrimination, particularly concerning insurance, employment, and social stigmatization. This paper highlights the importance of balancing individual rights, such as autonomy and privacy, with familial responsibilities and the potential benefits of early detection and intervention. It also underscores the need for robust legal frameworks, comprehensive genetic counseling, and ongoing public education to address the ethical and psychosocial challenges associated with genetic testing for HTPS, with the ultimate goal of maximizing the benefits of genomic medicine while minimizing potential harms.

Facilitators and Barriers to Uptake of Genetic and Cascade Testing in Familial Hypercholesterolemia: a Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is an underdiagnosed autosomal dominant genetic disorder that confers high but preventable risk for premature adverse cardiovascular events. Timely diagnosis is limited by low uptake of genetic testing (GT) and cascade testing (CT). This systematic review identifies barriers and facilitators for uptake of GT and CT in FH.

METHOD

Following PRISMA guidelines, seven databases were searched for studies on GT/CT in FH. Data reporting standards for qualitative studies were evaluated with COREQ and thematic synthesis was conducted. Of the 387 studies identified, 15 were included (qualitative N = 9, quantitative N = 6). These involved 272,954 respondents (qualitative n = 243, quantitative n = 272,711). COREQ scores ranged from 11 to 21 out of 32.

RESULTS

Synthesis of qualitative data indicated family history of illness, being well informed, and value of GT as key facilitators of GT. Financial concerns, suboptimal clinical care, and no/low value of GT were identified as barriers. Facilitators of CT included responsibility to family, healthcare providers' support for CT, and gains of CT, while barriers included disconnect from family, emotional costs, and no value knowing FH status. Quantitative studies reflect emotional distress avoidance, limited opportunity for family disclosure to invite, lack of knowledge, low communication efficacy, and difficulties accessing testing services as predictors impacting CT.

CONCLUSION

Beyond knowledge, perceptions about testing-especially perceived value of testing-emerged to be significantly affecting decisions for GT/CT. Disconnect from family is a maior predictor in CT, reducing the likelihood of probands extending an invitation to their family in support of CT. Future interventions should address barriers and facilitators at interpersonal, clinical and systemic levels to improve FH GT/CT uptake. Additionally, further research in diverse cultural contexts is required to bridge gaps in GT/CT services. Interventions should especially prioritize risk perception education and the development of health communication tools to supplement strong clinical guidance, driving a more patient-centered approach in decisions relating to GT/CT.

Cost-Effectiveness of Lynch Syndrome Identification Strategies in Individuals with Colorectal Cancer and the Impact on At-Risk Relatives

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Universal screening for Lynch syndrome (LS) is recommended for all patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer (CRC). A benefit of LS screening in CRC is cascade testing (CT), whereby at-risk relatives are tested for the familial pathogenic LS variant and undergo intensive surveillance for CRC prevention/early detection if identified with LS. There is not yet universal uptake of CT; we quantify the impact on CRC-related outcomes in first-degree relatives (FDRs).

METHODS

We developed a microsimulation model to quantify the impact of CT on CRC incidence and mortality in FDRs (parents, siblings, children) of individuals with CRC screened for LS. For FDRs, the primary outcome was the number of CRC cases and CRC-related deaths, by age of relative; secondary outcomes included life-years gained, quality-adjusted life-years, number of colonoscopies, and costs associated with CT, surveillance, and cancer care.

RESULTS

With CT for all eligible FDRs, we estimate 61.0% decrease in CRC cases and 78.5% decrease in CRC mortality. Although CT led to an average 11 more lifetime colonoscopies, there was modest increase in life-years gained and quality-adjusted life-years and decreased costs because of savings from cancer treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

This model quantifies the benefits of CT for at-risk FDRs of newly identified individuals with CRC and LS. The decrease in CRC incidence across generations can be used to facilitate discussions with relatives to improve uptake of CT. Further studies to optimize the uptake of CT are paramount to decrease risk of CRC in LS.

Uptake of Cascade Genetic Testing for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

This is a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the uptake of cascade genetic testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome. Among 30 studies included for meta-analysis, the uptake of cascade genetic testing was 33% (95% CI 25%-42%), with higher uptake rates among females compared with male relatives, and among first-degree compared with second-degree relatives. These findings indicate suboptimal uptake of cascade genetic testing among people at risk for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome, representing a missed opportunity for cancer prevention and early detection. There is a need for interventions to improve uptake rates.

How hereditary cancer risk disclosure to relatives is handled in practice - Patient perspectives from a Swedish cancer genetics clinic

OBJECTIVES

Hereditary cancer risks can be effectively managed if at-risk relatives enroll in surveillance and preventive care. Family-mediated risk disclosure has internationally been shown to be incomplete, selective and leave over a third of eligible at-risk individuals without access to genetic counseling. We explored patients handling of cancer risk information in practice.

METHODS

We conducted twelve semi-structured interviews with patients who had completed their genetic counseling and been asked to disclose risk information to relatives. Questions were designed to investigate lived experiences of communicating hereditary risk and focused on disclosure strategies, intrafamilial interactions and emotional responses.

RESULTS

Qualitative content analysis yielded five categories. These span personal fears, shared responsibilities, feeling of empowerment, innovative solutions and unmet needs. Patients put high value on collaboration with their genetic healthcare professionals but also solicited better overview of the counseling process and more personalized, case-tailored information.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results add novel insights about the practical strategies employed by genetic counselees and their motivations behind disclosing hereditary risk information to relatives.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

A patient-centered cancer genetics care would clarify roles and responsibilities around risk disclosure, inform counselees about the process upfront and tailor information to offer case-specific data with the family's inheritance pattern explained.

"Identity theft" in BRCA1/2: impact of positive genetic test results and risk-reducing interventions

Individuals harboring breast cancer gene 1/2 (BRCA1/2) pathogenic variants are at increased lifetime risk for developing cancer. Learning one's BRCA1/2 carrier status is a watershed moment that can result in psychological distress, anxiety, and depression, as well as feelings of vulnerability and stigma. However, emotional and coping responses to learning one's BRCA1/2 carrier status and after risk-reducing interventions (i.e., preventative bilateral mastectomy) are variable, and existing literature reveals mixed and sometimes contradictory results. Drawing on the concept of narrative identity from the field of psychology, we sought to examine if "identity theft" (the sudden overtaking of one's narrative agency by an external force) may help explain the heterogeneity of emotional and coping responses following the revelation of BRCA carrier status and the subsequent medical intervention one may receive. This Perspective explores BRCA related identity theft using two case studies. Narrative analysis of qualitative interviews uncover the ways that patients experience the disintegration (theft) of their identity as well as their efforts to build and reintegrate a new BRCA carrier identity. This initial qualitative exploration provides preliminary support for the relevance of narrative identity and identity theft to hereditary cancer. We posit that applying the lens of identity theft may hold promise as a unifying concept, integrating across the variable emotional and coping responses among BRCA carriers. Employing a lens of identity theft may help inform the development of tailored narrative interventions as part of precision healthcare to support active coping and psychosocial wellbeing.

Cascade testing in Italian Hereditary Breast Ovarian Cancer families: a missed opportunity for cancer prevention?

Healthy carriers of BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants (PVs) may benefit from risk-reducing measures of proven efficacy. The main approach to identify these individuals is cascade testing, and strategies to support this complex process are under investigation. In Italy, cascade testing has received little attention; therefore, we analyzed the uptake and characteristics of BRCA1/2 cascade testing in families diagnosed with HBOC between 2017 and 2019 at two Italian genetics centers. All blood relatives aged 18 years or older at September 2022 and who could be involved in the first step of cascade testing (i.e., all the living relatives closest to the proband) were included. In addition to first-degree relatives, individuals who were second-, third- or fourth-degree relatives were included if the closest relative(s) was/were deceased. Overall, 213 families were included (103, Genoa; 110, Bologna). Most probands were women affected by breast and/or ovarian cancer (86.4%, Genoa; 84.5%, Bologna), and the branch segregating the PV was known/suspected in 62% of families (62.1%, Genoa; 60.9%, Bologna). Overall, the uptake of cascade testing was 22.8% (25.8%, Genoa; 19.9%, Bologna; OR = 0.59: 95%CI 0.43-0.82). It was strongly associated with female gender (OR = 3.31, 95%CI 2.38-4.59), age ≤ 70 years (< 30 years OR = 3.48, 95%CI 1.85-6.56; 30-70 years OR = 3.08, 95%CI 2.01-4.71), first-degree relationship with the proband (OR = 16.61, 95%CI 10.50-26.28) and segregation of the PV in both the maternal (OR = 2.54, 95%CI 1.72-3.75) and the paternal branch (OR = 4.62, 95%CI 3.09-6.91). These real-world data may be important to inform the design and implementation of strategies aimed at improving the uptake of HBOC cascade testing in Italy.

Applying the framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions to increase family communication about hereditary cancer

Objective

Evaluate an intervention to increase family communication (FC) of positive hereditary cancer test results using the Framework for Developing and Evaluating Complex Interventions (FDECI).

Methods

We developed 'programme theory' during the FDECI development phase by aligning intervention components with behavior change techniques (BCTs) and theoretical factors expected to improve FC. During the feasibility phase, we obtained feedback from 12 stakeholder interviews.

Results

Intervention components aligned with a total of 14 unique BCTs for which prior evidence links the BCT to theoretical factors that influence behavior change. Constructive stakeholder feedback included: more information desired, rewording to support autonomy by highlighting options, and improvements to navigation, visuals, and audio. Positive comments included: comprehensiveness of materials, modeling of conversations, and usefulness of the materials for helping a person prepare to share positive test results.

Conclusion

The first FDECI phases were helpful for improving the intervention and planning our ongoing effectiveness and future implementation phases.

Innovation

Our application of the FDECI is novel, including plans to test our 'programme theory' using coincidence analysis (CNA) to determine who accesses which intervention materials, how utilizing certain materials impact the aligned theoretical factors, and whether these in turn make a difference in the behavioral outcome.

Privacy and utility of genetic testing in families with hereditary cancer syndromes living in three countries: the international cascade genetic screening experience

Background: Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer and Lynch syndrome are associated with increased lifetime risk for common cancers. Offering cascade genetic testing to cancer-free relatives of individuals with HBOC or LS is a public health intervention for cancer prevention. Yet, little is known about the utility and value of information gained from cascade testing. This paper discusses ELSI encountered during the implementation of cascade testing in three countries with national healthcare systems: Switzerland, Korea, and Israel. Methods: A workshop presented at the 5th International ELSI Congress discussed implementation of cascade testing in the three countries based on exchange of data and experiences from the international CASCADE cohort. Results: Analyses focused on models of accessing genetic services (clinic-based versus population-based screening), and models of initiating cascade testing (patient-mediated dissemination versus provider-mediated dissemination of testing results to relatives). The legal framework of each country, organization of the healthcare system, and socio-cultural norms determined the utility and value of genetic information gained from cascade testing. Conclusion: The juxtaposition of individual versus public health interests generates significant ELSI controversies associated with cascade testing, which compromise access to genetic services and the utility and value of genetic information, despite national healthcare/universal coverage.

Cascade testing after exome sequencing: Retrospective analysis of linked family data at 2 US laboratories

PURPOSE

Cascade testing, the process of testing a proband's at-risk relatives, is integral to realizing the full value of genomic sequencing. However, there is little empirical evidence on the uptake of cascade testing after a positive exome sequencing (ES) result in a population of probands with diverse clinical indications.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed administrative data from 2 US clinical laboratories that perform ES. For each proband with a positive ES result, we used linked family data to describe the frequency of relatives' cascade testing performed at the same laboratory, variant detection yield of cascade tests, and characteristics of probands and relatives categorized on the basis of cascade testing completion.

RESULTS

Among the 3723 positive ES results across both laboratories, 426 relatives of 282 probands completed cascade testing (uptake = 7.6%). An average of 1.5 relatives (SD = 0.9) were tested per proband. Of the 426 relatives tested, 200 had a variant of interest detected (variant detection yield = 47.0%).

CONCLUSION

In our real-world data analysis, a small proportion of probands with a positive ES result subsequently had relatives complete cascade testing at the same laboratory. However, approximately half of the tested relatives received a clinically significant result that could have implications for clinical management or reproductive planning. Additional research on ways to increase cascade testing uptake is warranted.

Relatives from Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer and Lynch Syndrome Families Forgoing Genetic Testing: Findings from the Swiss CASCADE Cohort

Cascade genetic testing of relatives from families with pathogenic variants associated with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) or Lynch syndrome (LS) has important implications for cancer prevention. We compared the characteristics of relatives from HBOC or LS families who did not have genetic testing (GT (−) group) with those who had genetic testing (GT (+) group), regardless of the outcome. Self-administered surveys collected cross-sectional data between September 2017 and December 2021 from relatives participating in the CASCADE cohort. We used multivariable logistic regression with LASSO variable selection. Among n = 115 relatives who completed the baseline survey, 38% (n = 44) were in the GT (−) group. Being male (OR: 2.79, 95% CI: 1.10–7.10) and without a previous cancer diagnosis (OR: 4.47, 95% CI: 1.03–19.42) increased the odds of being untested by almost three times. Individuals from families with fewer tested relatives had 29% higher odds of being untested (OR: 0.71, 95% CI: 0.55–0.92). Reasons for forgoing cascade testing were: lack of provider recommendation, lack of time and interest in testing, being afraid of discrimination, and high out-of-pocket costs. Multilevel interventions designed to increase awareness about clinical implications of HBOC and LS in males, referrals from non-specialists, and support for testing multiple family members could improve the uptake of cascade testing.

The Communication Chain of Genetic Risk: Analyses of Narrative Data Exploring Proband–Provider and Proband–Family Communication in Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer

Low uptake of genetic services among members of families with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) suggests limitations of proband-mediated communication of genetic risk. This study explored how genetic information proceeds from healthcare providers to probands and from probands to relatives, from the probands’ perspectives. Using a grounded-theory approach, we analyzed narrative data collected with individual interviews and focus groups from a sample of 48 women identified as carriers of HBOC-associated pathogenic variants from three linguistic regions of Switzerland. The findings describe the “communication chain”, confirming the difficulties of proband-mediated communication. Provider–proband communication is impacted by a three-level complexity in the way information about family communication is approached by providers, received by probands, and followed-up by the healthcare system. Probands’ decisions regarding disclosure of genetic risk are governed by dynamic and often contradictory logics of action, interconnected with individual and family characteristics, eventually compelling probands to engage in an arbitrating process. The findings highlight the relevance of probands’ involvement in the communication of genetic risk to relatives, suggesting the need to support them in navigating the complexity of family communication rather than replacing them in this process. Concrete actions at the clinical and health system levels are needed to improve proband-mediated communication.