Can HER2 1+ Breast Cancer Be Considered as HER2-Low Tumor? A Comparison of Clinicopathological Features, Quantitative HER2 mRNA Levels, and Prognosis among HER2-Negative Breast Cancer

HER2 mRNA Score From Quantitative ERBB2 mRNA Expression of Oncotype Dx : Can It Replace the HER2 Immunohistochemistry?

As novel human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) and drug conjugates have proven to be effective treatments for both HER2-positive breast cancer (BC) and HER2-low BC, the need to develop more accurate methods to quantify HER2 status has increased. We compared the correlation between the HER2 mRNA score (HS), obtained using the Oncotype DX (ODX) test, and HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) to verify the accuracy of HER2 quantification and its correlation with clinicopathologic characteristics. We retrospectively collected ODX test data from 1524 estrogen-receptor positive, HER2-negative patients with BC. No significant differences in clinicopathologic characteristics, including ODX Recurrence Score (RS), were observed between HER2-0 and HER2-low BC. The median HS value of the HER2-low subgroup was significantly higher than that of the HER2-0 subgroup ( P <0.001) and increased significantly between the 4 subgroups classified by HER2 IHC ( P <0.001). The receiver operating characteristic curve showed acceptable utility in distinguishing HER2-0 from HER2-low (area under the curve=0.76) and HER2-null and HER2-ultralow subgroups (area under the curve=0.81), but the overlap between subgroups was also prominent. After defining 8.9 as a suboptimal cutoff mRNA score, multivariate analysis revealed that low Ki-67 (<20%) and RS (≤25) were statistically associated with higher HS (>8.9), whereas progesterone receptor negativity, high Ki-67, high nuclear grade, lower HS, and older age (>50 y) were statistically associated with high RS. Our study revealed that HS is significantly associated with HER2 IHC results and clinicopathologic parameters other than HER2 IHC.

HER2-low across solid tumours: different incidences and definitions

Antibody-drug conjugates, particularly trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd), have emerged as effective therapies for various solid tumours. Clinical trials show that T-DXd improves survival in both HER2-positive and HER2-low breast cancer patients. Additionally, it improves survival in HER2-positive gastro-oesophageal cancer and elicits objective responses in HER2-low tumours. Responses have also been noted in lung and gynaecological cancers with HER2 expression, although subgroup analyses for HER2-low cases are lacking. This review assesses HER2 protein expression levels and gene amplification across solid tumours where T-DXd shows potential benefits. We focus on the accuracy and limitations of HER2 testing methods, particularly for identifying HER2-low cancer. A semi-systematic approach was employed, searching EMBASE, Medline, Cochrane, and PubMed databases. We calculated median incidences of HER2-positive, HER2-low, and HER2-0 by immunohistochemistry (IHC), and HER2 amplification by in situ hybridisation (ISH). A total of 144 studies were included, covering breast (n=57), gastro-oesophageal (n=33), lung (n=17), gynaecological (n=24), and various other carcinomas (n=13). The median incidences of HER2-low were 52%, 16%, 58%, and 17% in breast, gastro-oesophageal, endometrial, and ovarian cancers, respectively, with unknown incidences in lung and cervical cancers. Factors influencing HER2-low detection include tumour heterogeneity, antibody clones, observer variability, and lack of validated scoring criteria. Given the significant proportion of HER2-low cases, many patients could benefit from T-DXd, but limitations in detection accuracy necessitate further research and standardisation in diagnostic methods and criteria to advance the clinical utility of T-DXd for HER2-low tumours.

Overexpression of cytoplasmic poly(A)-binding protein 1 as a biomarker for the prognosis and selection of postoperative regimen in breast cancer

PURPOSE

The dysregulation of the cytoplasmic poly(A)-binding protein 1 (PABPC1) is involved in a variety of tumors but little is known about its role in human breast cancer. Therefore, the effect of PABPC1 in the prognosis and regimen selection in breast cancer patients was evaluated.

METHODS

A total of 791 cases of invasive breast cancer were included in this study, although only 416 were involved in subsequent analyses after the propensity score matching (PSM) test. PABPC1 expression was detected by immunohistochemistry. The relationship between PABPC1 expression and clinicopathological factors, postoperative regimens, and outcomes was determined.

RESULTS

In the total 791 cases, 583 cases were positive for PABPC1, but only 212 (26.8%) showed high PABPC1 expression (PABPC1-HE). The overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) of PABPC1-HE patients after PSM were significantly worse than those in patients with PABPC1 low expression (PABPC1-LE), regardless of age, molecular type, tumor size, nodal status, or pStage. Postoperative chemotherapy (CT) increased the OS of PABPC1-HE patients but not that of PABPC1-LE patients. Among patients receiving endocrine therapy, those in the PABPC-LE group had an extended OS, while CT or chemoradiotherapy (CT/CRT) only significantly extended the OS time of PABPC-HE patients. CT/CRT did not significantly extend the survival of PABPC1-LE HER2-positive patients but extended the OS of PABPC1-HE HER2-positive patients. However, the OS of patients treated with CT/CRT + trastuzumab therapy was significantly longer than that of other patients under other therapies in the PABPC1-HE group, suggesting that PABPC1-HE might be sensitive to trastuzumab-based therapy. The multivariate analysis revealed that PABPC1-HE was an independent prognostic factor for both poor OS and DFS in breast cancer except luminal A type.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results revealed that PABPC1 might be considered as a biomarker to help in subtyping, as well as in the prognosis and regimen selection of breast cancer patients.

Current status and challenges in HER2 IHC assessment: scoring survey results in Japan

PURPOSE

This study aimed to assess the concordance of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) expression scoring by immunohistochemistry (IHC) among practicing pathologists in Japan, given the challenging nature of scoring and the critical role of HER2 status in breast cancer management.

METHODS

Whole slide images (WSI) from 20 invasive breast cancer cases (1 representative WSI per case) selected to represent a diverse IHC scores and staining patterns were used in an online survey involving seven reference pathologists who established consensus HER2 IHC scores (0 to 3 +) decided by majority interpretation. Participating pathologists nationwide scored the same 20 WSI cases online using the American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists (ASCO/CAP) 2018 guidelines. Deidentified case metadata were registered in the uPath system.

RESULTS

A total of 144 participating pathologists responded. The scoring results of the participating pathologists most commonly agreed with the consensus IHC score, followed by a ± 1 point deviation and no survey responses with > 1 point deviation. The mean percentage of agreement with the consensus score for all 20 cases was 63.4%. In cases where the reference pathologists' scores were discordant, the participating pathologists also showed a lower concordance rate.

CONCLUSION

This study highlighted the current status of HER2 expression scoring by IHC for breast cancer among pathologists in Japan. These findings underscore the challenges in HER2 IHC scoring cases and emphasize the need for improved standardization and training, especially in the evolving landscape of HER2-targeted therapies.

Exploring the heterogeneity of HER2 gene status and expression in non-positive breast cancer patients: insights from immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization

Breast cancer became the most prevalent malignancy among women, and HER2 expression status is critical for treatment decisions. With the emergence of ADC drugs, HER2 low-expressing patients who previously did not respond well to traditional anti-HER2 therapies may now benefit. In this study, immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) were applied to assess HER2 expression in 349 patients with HER2-non-positive breast cancer. Our analysis revealed that HER2-low tumors exhibited fewer grade III tumors (39.74% and 55.65%, respectively, P = 0.005) and higher positivity for estrogen receptor (ER, 88.89% vs. 61.74%, P < 0.001) and progesterone receptor (PR, 84.62% vs. 57.39%, P < 0.001) compared to HER2-ZERO tumors. Of the 349 cases, IHC was ultimately evaluated in 327, the antibodies demonstrated only 64.22% (95% CI: 58.76-69.42%) agreement between clone 4B5 and clone EP3. Pathologist 1, who had more extensive working experience, demonstrated higher consistency (94.19%) with the gold standard when using clone EP3, compared to Pathologist 2 (74.31%). FISH analysis revealed significant differences in HER2/CEP17 ratio and average HER2 copy numbers between HER2-ZERO and HER2-low tumors, but no clear cut-off value could be identified. Notably, HER2/CEP17 ratio mostly between 1 and 2, with HER2-ZERO tumors primarily ≤ 1.4, and average HER2 copy numbers were mostly ≥ 2 and < 4, with HER2-ZERO tumors primarily ≤ 2.5. Despite distinct clinicopathological features, FISH remains inadequate for distinguishing HER2-low from HER2-ZERO expression. Further studies are needed to improve HER2 assessment in this challenging subset of patients.

Deciphering HER2-low breast cancer (BC): insights from real-world data in early stage breast cancer

Background

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-low has emerged as a potential new entity in breast cancer (BC). Data on this subset are limited, and prognostic results are controversial, evidencing the need of further data in a BC real-world cohort.

Methods

Patients with HER2-negative stage I-III BC diagnosed between 2006 and 2016 were retrospectively reviewed in a single cohort from the Catalan Institute of Oncology Badalona. Demographics and clinicopathological characteristics were examined via medical charts/electronic health records. We aim to describe and compare HER2-0/HER2-low populations through Chi-square or Fisher test, and explore its prognostic impact using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression models.

Results

From a cohort of 1755 BC patients, 1401 invasive HER2-negative, stage I-III cases were evaluated. 87% were hormone receptor (HR)-positive versus 13% triple negative (TNBC). Overall, 43% were HER2-0 and 57% HER2-low (61% immunohistochemistry (IHC) 1+ and 39% IHC 2+). Comparing HER2-low versus HER2-0, HER2-low showed higher proportion of estrogen receptor (ER)-positive (91.6% vs 79.9%, p ⩽ 0.001) and progesterone receptor (PR)-positive (79.8% vs 68.9%, p ⩽ 0.001) cases. HER2-0 exhibited higher proportion of TNBC (20.1% vs 8.4%, p = 0.001), grade III tumors (28.8% vs 23.5%, p = 0.039), and higher Ki67 median value (26.47% vs 23.88%, p = 0.041). HER2-low was associated with longer time to distant recurrence (TTDR) compared to HER2-0 (67.8 vs 54.1 months; p = 0.015) and better BC-related survival (19.2 vs 16.3 years; p = 0.033). In the multivariable analysis, HER2-low was not an independent prognostic factor for TTDR and BC-related survival. ER expression showed a strong association with longer TTDR (Hazard Ratio: 0.425, p ⩽ 0.001) and improved BC-related survival (Hazard Ratio: 0.380, p ⩽ 0.001). PR expression was also associated with longer TTDR (Hazard Ratio: 0.496, p ⩽ 0.001), and improved BC-related survival (Hazard Ratio: 0.488, p ⩽ 0.001). Histological grade III was significantly associated with shorter TTDR (Hazard Ratio: 1.737, p = 0.002). Positive nodal status was the strongest factor correlated with worse BC-related survival (Hazard Ratio: 2.747, p ⩽ 0.001).

Conclusion

HER2-low was significantly associated with HR-positive disease, whereas HER2-0 group had higher incidence of TNBC, histological grade III and higher Ki67%. Although HER2-low group was associated with longer TTDR and improved BC-related survival, these findings could be explained by the greater proportion of favorable prognostic features in this subgroup compared to HER2-0.

Characterization of HER2-Low Breast Tumors among a Cohort of Colombian Women

HER2-low tumors have shown promise in response to antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) in recent clinical trials, underscoring the need to characterize this group's clinical phenotype. In this study, we aimed to explore the clinicopathological features, survival rates, and HER2 amplicon mRNA expression of women affected with HER2-low breast cancer, compared with HER2-negative and HER2-positive groups. We included 516 breast cancer patients from Colombia, for whom we compared clinicopathological features, mRNA expression of three HER2 amplicon genes (ERBB2, GRB7 and MIEN1), survival and risk of mortality between HER2-low cases (1+ or 2+ with negative in situ hybridization (ISH) result) with HER2-positive (3+ or 2+ with positive ISH test) and HER2-negative (0+) cases. A higher proportion of patients with better-differentiated tumors and a lower proliferation index were observed for HER2-low tumors compared to the HER2-positive group. Additionally, HER2-low tumors showed higher mRNA expression of the ERBB2 gene and longer overall survival rates compared to HER2-negative cases. Nonetheless, a Cox-adjusted model by ER status and clinical stage showed no statistically significant differences between these groups. Our results show differences in important clinicopathological features between HER2-low and both HER2-positive and negative tumors. Given this unique phenotype, it is crucial to evaluate the potential advantages of ADC therapies for this emerging subtype of breast cancer.

Association of Oncotype-DX HER2 Single Gene Score With HER2 Expression Assessed by Immunohistochemistry in HER2-low Breast Cancer

Background/Aim

"HER2-low" is an emerging subtype of breast cancer, with a documented role in predicting response to treatment with novel antibody-drug conjugates. It is defined based on immunohistochemistry, but increasing evidence is challenging this approach as appropriate for identifying the HER2-low subgroup, due to both interobserver variability and limitations of the method itself.

Patients and Methods

We retrospectively analyzed data from 430 patients from our departmental databases who had been subjected to an Oncotype-DX score and assessed the correlation of the Oncotype-DX HER2 single-gene score with the HER2 expression on immunohistochemistry. The Oncotype-DX Recurrence Score was also evaluated in the HER2-0 versus HER2-low subgroups.

Results

The HER2 single-gene score was found to accurately correlate with the HER2 result on immunohistochemistry, with a statistically significant difference both between HER2-0 and HER2 +1 tumors (p<0.0001), as well as between HER2 +1 and +2 tumors (p<0.0001). There was no statistically significant difference in the recurrence score between the HER2-0 and the HER2-low subgroups.

Conclusion

Oncotype-DX single-gene scores for HER2 are a potential surrogate marker for assessing the precise HER2 status, with better reproducibility and less interobserver variance compared to immunohistochemistry. The use of rt-PCR emerges as an alternative method of assessment of the HER2-low subgroup.

In ER-Positive, HER2-Negative Breast Cancers, HER2 mRNA Levels Correlate Better with Clinicopathologic Features and Oncotype DX Recurrence Score than HER2 Immunohistochemistry

With the approval of trastuzumab deruxtecan for treating advanced human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) low breast cancer (BC), it has become increasingly important to develop more accurate and reliable methods to identify HER2-low BC. In addition, HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) has limitations for quantification of HER2. We explored the relationship between HER2 IHC and mRNA levels and evaluated whether HER2 IHC scores and mRNA levels are associated with clinicopathologic features and Oncotype DX Recurrence Score (RS) in estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, HER2-negative BCs. A total of 750 BCs sent for Oncotype DX (ODX) testing were included in this study, and 559 with HER2 mRNA levels were available. There were no statistically significant differences between HER2 0 and HER2-low BC in clinicopathologic variables or ODX RS using HER2 IHC. There was a significant difference in median HER2 mRNA values between HER2 0 and HER2-low (8.7 vs 9.3, P < .001); however, the HER2 mRNA distribution had substantial overlap between these 2 groups with a suboptimal area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.68). A HER2 mRNA value of 9.2 was generated as the optimal cutoff for distinguishing HER2 0 and HER2-low BC. Comparing ER+ BCs with HER2 mRNA high (>9.2) and low (≤9.2) revealed a statistically significant difference in most clinicopathologic variables and ODX RS. From this large cohort of ER-positive, HER2-negative BC, our results demonstrated that HER2 mRNA levels correlated better with clinicopathologic features and recurrence risk as assessed by ODX RS than HER2 IHC scores. Our findings suggest that HER2 mRNA-detecting methods could potentially serve as a quantitative and reliable method for identifying a biologically meaningful group of HER2-low BC. Further study is needed to determine whether HER2 mRNA levels could be more reliable than IHC for identifying which patients will be most likely to benefit from trastuzumab deruxtecan.

Correlation of In Situ HER2 RNA Expression With HER2 Immunohistochemistry and Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization Categories in Breast Cancer

CONTEXT.—

RNA sequencing study has demonstrated that human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) RNA levels influence anti-HER2 therapeutic efficacy. However, in situ HER2 RNA expression (isHRE), which evaluates HER2 RNA expression in tissue, has remained unclear in breast cancers (BCs) of various HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC)/in situ hybridization (ISH) categories.

OBJECTIVE.—

To correlate isHRE with all HER2 IHC/fluorescence ISH (FISH) categories in BC.

DESIGN.—

Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue sections from 259 BCs, covering all IHC/FISH categories, were analyzed for isHRE by RNAscope.

RESULTS.—

We validated HER2 RNAscope scoring as a semiquantitative method to evaluate isHRE and demonstrated significantly higher RNAscope scores in IHC 3+ than in IHC 2+ cases, and in IHC 2+ than in IHC 0/1+ cases. Among the 5 IHC 2+/FISH groups, group 1 (G1) cases had the highest scores. The scores in G3 cases were higher than those in G2, but not significantly different from those in G4 and G5. G4 cases had significantly higher scores than those in G2. Higher HER2 copy numbers and HER2:CEP 17 (centromere 17) copy number ratios were significantly correlated with higher isHRE in G1 cases, but not in G2 to G5 cases. RNAscope scores were significantly lower in HER2-negative (IHC 0) than in HER2-low (IHC 2+/FISH- and IHC 1+) BCs but were not different between IHC 0 and 1+ BCs when analyzed separately.

CONCLUSIONS.—

We demonstrate the HER2 RNA expression status among BCs of various HER2 IHC/FISH categories in tissue. Such information may be relevant for anti-HER2 treatment decisions considering the role of HER2 RNA expression in predicting anti-HER2 therapeutic efficacy.

A gene expression-based classifier for HER2-low breast cancer

In clinical trials evaluating antibody-conjugated drugs (ADCs), HER2-low breast cancer is defined through protein immunohistochemistry scoring (IHC) 1+ or 2+ without gene amplification. However, in daily practice, the accuracy of IHC is compromised by inter-observer variability. Herein, we aimed to identify HER2-low breast cancer primary tumors by leveraging gene expression profiling. A discovery approach was applied to gene expression profile of institutional INT1 (n = 125) and INT2 (n = 84) datasets. We identified differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in each specific HER2 IHC category 0, 1+, 2+ and 3+. Principal Component Analysis was used to generate a HER2-low signature whose performance was evaluated in the independent INT3 (n = 95), and in the publicly available TCGA and GSE81538 datasets. The association between the HER2-low signature and HER2 IHC categories was evaluated by Kruskal-Wallis test with post hoc pair-wise comparisons. The HER2-low signature discriminatory capability was assessed by estimating the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Gene Ontology and KEGG analyses were performed to evaluate the HER2-low signature genes functional enrichment. A HER2-low signature was computed based on HER2 IHC category-specific DEGs. The twenty genes included in the signature were significantly enriched with lipid and steroid metabolism pathways, peptidase regulation, and humoral immune response. The HER2-low signature values showed a bell-shaped distribution across IHC categories (low values in 0 and 3+; high values in 1+ and 2+), effectively distinguishing HER2-low from 0 (p < 0.001) to 3+ (p < 0.001). Notably, the signature values were higher in tumors scored with 1+ as compared to 0. The HER2-low signature association with IHC categories and its bell-shaped distribution was confirmed in the independent INT3, TCGA and GSE81538 datasets. In the combined INT1 and INT3 datasets, the HER2-low signature achieved an AUC value of 0.74 (95% confidence interval, CI 0.67-0.81) in distinguishing HER2-low vs. the other categories, outperforming the individual ERBB2 mRNA AUC value of 0.52 (95% CI 0.43-0.60). These results represent a proof-of-concept for an observer-independent gene-expression-based classifier of HER2-low status. The herein identified 20-gene signature shows promise in distinguishing between HER2 0 and HER2-low expressing tumors, including those scored as 1+ at IHC, and in developing a selection approach for ADCs candidates.

The trichotomy of HER2 expression confers new insights into the understanding and managing for breast cancer stratified by HER2 status

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) is a tyrosine kinase receptor that plays a carcinogenic role in breast cancer (BC) through gene amplification, mutation, or overexpression. Traditional methods of HER2 detection were divided into positive (immunohistochemistry (IHC) 3+/fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) amplification) and negative (IHC 2+/FISH-, IHC 1+, IHC 0) according to the dichotomy method. Anti-HER2-targeted therapies, such as trastuzumab and pertuzumab, have significantly improved the prognosis of HER2-positive patients. However, up to 75% to 85% of patients remain HER2-negative. In recent years, with the rapid development of molecular biology, gene detection technology, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy, researchers have actively explored the clinicopathological characteristics, molecular biological characteristics, treatment methods, and HER2 detection methods of HER2-low/zero breast cancer. With the clinical efficacy of new anti-HER2 targeted drugs, accurate classification of breast cancer is very important for the treatment choice. Therefore, the following review summarizes the necessity of developing HER2 detection methods, and the clinicopathological and drug treatment characteristics of patients with HER2-low/zero, to light the dawn of the treatment of breast cancer patients with HER2-low/zero expression.

Incidence, Clinicopathologic Features, HER2 Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization Profile, and Oncotype DX Results of Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Low Breast Cancers: Experience From a Single Academic Center

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-low breast cancer, defined by an immunohistochemical (IHC) score of 1+ or 2+ with negative in situ hybridization, is emerging as a predictive marker for the use of the antibody-drug conjugate. To understand how this category differs from HER2-zero cases, we investigated clinicopathological characteristics and HER2 fluorescence in situ hybridization results in a large cohort of 1309 continuous HER2-negative invasive breast carcinomas from 2018 to 2021 evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration-approved HER2 IHC test. Additionally, we compared Oncotype DX recurrence scores and HER2 mRNA expression between HER-low and HER2-zero cases in a separate cohort of 438 estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) early-stage breast carcinoma cases from 2014 to 2016. Based on the cohort from 2018 to 2021, the incidence of HER2-low breast cancers was approximately 54%. HER2-low cases had less frequent grade 3 morphology, less frequent triple-negative results, ER and progesterone receptor negativity, and a higher mean HER2 copy number and HER2/CEP17 ratio than HER2-zero cases (P < .0001). Among ER+ cases, HER2-low cases showed significantly less frequent Nottingham grade 3 tumors. In the cohort from 2014 to 2016, HER2-low cases showed significantly higher ER+ percentages, fewer progesterone receptor-negative cases, lower Oncotype DX recurrence scores, and higher HER2 mRNA expression scores than HER2-zero cases. In summary, this is the first study, to our knowledge, using a large cohort of continuous cases evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration-approved HER2 IHC companion diagnostic test for HER2-low expression and HER2 fluorescence in situ hybridization profile in a real-world setting. Although HER2-low cases showed a higher HER2 copy number, ratio, and mRNA level than HER2-zero cases statistically, such small differences are unlikely to be biologically or clinically meaningful. However, our study suggests that HER2-low/ER+ early-stage breast carcinoma may represent a less aggressive group of breast carcinoma, given its association with a lower Nottingham grade and Oncotype DX recurrence score.

The effect of low HER2 expression on treatment outcomes in metastatic hormone receptor positive breast cancer patients treated with a combination of a CDK4/6 inhibitor and endocrine therapy: A multicentric retrospective study

BACKGROUND

CDK4/6 inhibitors combined with endocrine therapy have significantly improved treatment outcomes for metastatic hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer patients. However, the impact of low HER2 expression on treatment response and progression-free survival (PFS) remains unclear.

METHODS

This multicenter retrospective study included 204 HR+ breast cancer patients treated with a combination of CDK4/6 inhibitor and endocrine therapy. HER2-zero disease was detected in 138 (68%) and HER2-low disease in 66 (32%) patients. Treatment-related characteristics and clinical outcomes were analyzed, with a median follow-up of 22 months.

RESULTS

The objective response rate (ORR) was 72.7% in the HER2 low group and 66.6% in the HER2 zero group (p = 0.54). Median PFS was not significantly different between the HER2-low and HER2 zero groups (19 months vs.18 months, p = 0.89), although there was a trend toward longer PFS in the HER2-low group for first-line treatment (24 months progression-free survival rate 63% vs 49%). In recurrent disease, the median PFS was 25 months in the HER2-low group and 12 months in the HER2-zero group (p = 0.08), while in de novo metastatic disease, the median PFS was 18 months in the HER2-low group and 27 months in the HER2-zero group (p = 0.16). The order of CDK4/6 inhibitor use and the presence of visceral metastasis were identified as independent variables affecting PFS.

CONCLUSION

Low HER2 expression did not significantly impact treatment response or PFS in HR+ breast cancer patients treated with a CDK4/6 inhibitor and endocrine therapy. Because of the conflicting results in the literature, further prospective studies are needed to evaluate the clinical significance of HER2 expression in HR+ breast cancer.

RT-qPCR is helpful to distinguish the clinicopathological features of HER2 immunohistochemistry 0 and 1

The most commonly applied techniques to assess human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) expression in breast cancer are immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). HER2 detection by reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) can provide standardized, objective and automated assessment and reflect the HER2 expression continuity. Currently, there is lack of sufficient evidence to validate whether RT‑qPCR technique is more appropriate for the detection of HER2 low expression, especially ultra-low expression. Here, we primarily utilized RT-qPCR to differentiate HER2 true negative, ultra-low and 1 +, and compare the clinicopathological features and prognosis between RT-qPCR and IHC. 136 breast cancer cases with HER2 0 or 1 + were collected, also included 21 cases with HER2 2 + FISH negative as well as 25 cases with HER2 positive during the same period for comparative analysis. Compared the mRNA levels based on IHC/FISH scores. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was utilized to determine the threshold for reclassification, and the clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis differences among IHC true negative, ultra-low and 1 + after re-classification by RT-qPCR were analyzed. The mRNA level significantly differed between the IHC 0 and 1 + groups (p < 0.001). The IHC 0 group was further divided into true negative and ultra-low, there was no statistically significant difference in mRNA levels between true negative and ultra-low groups, while the difference between ultra-low and 1 + mRNA levels was statistically significant (p < 0.001). After reclassification of IHC true negative, ultra-low and 1 + by RT-qPCR, there were statistically significant differences in histological grade, ER, PR and TILs expression. There was no significant difference between DFS and OS in the two classification methods. RT-qPCR classification aids in distinguishing clinicopathological characteristics and can serve as a supplementary technique for detecting HER2-low by IHC.

Discordance of HER2-Low between Primary Tumors and Matched Distant Metastases in Breast Cancer

We examined differences in HER2 expression between primary tumors and distant metastases, particularly within the HER2-negative primary breast cancer cohort (HER2-low and HER2-zero). The retrospective study included 191 consecutive paired samples of primary breast cancer and distant metastases diagnosed between 1995 and 2019. HER2-negative samples were divided into HER2-zero (immunohistochemistry [IHC] score 0) and HER2-low (IHC score 1+ or 2+/in situ hybridization [ISH]-negative). The main objective was to analyze the discordance rate between matched primary and metastatic samples, focusing on the site of distant metastasis, molecular subtype, and de novo metastatic breast cancer. The relationship was determined by cross-tabulation and calculation of Cohen's Kappa coefficient. The final study cohort included 148 paired samples. The largest proportion in the HER2-negative cohort was HER2-low [primary tumor 61.4% (n = 78), metastatic samples 73.5% (n = 86)]. The discordance rate between the HER2 status of primary tumors and corresponding distant metastases was 49.6% (n = 63) (Kappa -0.003, 95%CI -0.15-0.15). Development of a HER2-low phenotype occurred most frequently (n = 52, 40.9%), mostly with a switch from HER2-zero to HER2-low (n = 34, 26.8%). Relevant HER2 discordance rates were observed between different metastatic sites and molecular subtypes. Primary metastatic breast cancer had a significantly lower HER2 discordance rate than secondary metastatic breast cancer [30.2% (Kappa 0.48, 95%CI 0.27-0.69) versus 50.5% (Kappa 0.14, 95% CI -0.03-0.32)]. This highlights the importance of evaluating potentially therapy-relevant discordance rates between a primary tumor and corresponding distant metastases.

The impact of HER2-low status on response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in clinically HER2-negative breast cancer

PURPOSE

Low expression of HER2 (HER2-low expression) in breast cancer (BC) has unique biological characteristics. However, whether HER2-low expression has an impact on neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in HER2-negative breast cancer remains unclear.

METHODS

This study reviewed the clinicopathological data of patients with BC treated with NACT at a single hospital from January 2018 to July 2022. Baseline patient characteristics, efficacy of NACT, and survival data were compared between the HER2-0 and HER2-low groups. The impact of NACT on HER2 status also was investigated. Subgroup analyses based on hormone receptor (HR) status were performed to explore the impact of HR signaling on HER2 status during chemotherapy.

RESULTS

The progesterone receptor-positive rate in the HER2-low group was significantly higher than that in HER2-0 group. The local treatment response of the HER2-low group was worse, but the disease-free survival rate of the HER2-low group was significantly better than that of the HER2-0 group. The proportion of patients with increased HER2 immunohistochemistry score after NACT was significantly higher in the HER2-0 group. Subgroup analysis showed that the efficacy of chemotherapy in HR + patients was significantly worse than in HR- patients, and HR + patients had a higher proportion of increased HER2 immunohistochemistry score after chemotherapy. Mechanistic studies suggested that MLH1 expression loss during chemotherapy might link HR signaling and regulation of HER2 expression.

CONCLUSIONS

We found that HER2-low expressing BC exhibits differential sensitivity to chemotherapy compared to HER2-0 expressing BC. The regulation of HER2 expression by HR signaling may mediate aspects of chemoresistance.

Current Biological, Pathological and Clinical Landscape of HER2-Low Breast Cancer

HER2-low breast cancer (BC) is a newly defined subset of HER2-negative BC that has HER2 immunohistochemical (IHC) score of 1+ or score of 2+/in situ hybridization (ISH) negative phenotype. Recent clinical trials have demonstrated significant clinical benefits of novel HER2 directing antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) in treating this group of tumors. Trastuzumab-deruxtecan (T-Dxd), a HER2-directing ADC was recently approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration as the first targeted therapy to treat HER2-low BC. However, HER2-low BC is still not well characterized clinically and pathologically. This review aims to update the current biological, pathological and clinical landscape of HER2-low BC based on the English literature published in the past two years and to propose the future directions on clinical management, pathology practice, and translational research in this subset of BC. We hope it would help better understand the tumor biology of HER2-low BC and the current efforts for identifying and treating this newly recognized targetable group of BC.

HER2-Low Status Is Not Accurate in Breast Cancer Core Needle Biopsy Samples: An Analysis of 5610 Consecutive Patients

Background: HER2-Low status is found in approximately half of breast cancer patients and shows potential benefits from novel antibody−drug conjugates (ADCs). Data on the accuracy of HER2-Low status between core needle biopsy (CNB) and surgical excision specimen (SES) samples are lacking. We aimed to investigate the accuracy of HER2-Low status diagnosis between CNB and SES samples. Methods: Consecutive early-stage breast cancer patients who underwent surgery from January 2009 to March 2022 with paired CNB and SES samples were retrospectively reviewed. HER2-Low was defined as IHC 1+ or IHC2+ and FISH-negative. Concordance rates were analyzed by the Kappa test. Further clinicopathological characteristics were compared among different HER2 status and their changes. Results: A total of 5610 patients were included, of whom 3209 (57.2%) and 3320 (59.2%) had HER2-Low status in CNB and SES samples, respectively. The concordance rate of HER2 status in the whole population was 82.37% (Kappa = 0.684, p < 0.001), and was 76.87% in the HER2-Negative patients (Kappa = 0.372, p < 0.001). Among 1066 HER2-0 cases by CNB, 530 patients were classified as HER2-Low tumors. On the contrary, in 3209 patients with HER2-Low tumor by CNB, 387 were scored as HER2-0 on the SES samples. ER-negative or Ki67 high expression tumor by CNB had a high concordance rate of HER2-Low status. Conclusions: A relatively low concordance rate was found when evaluating HER2-Low status between CNB and SES samples in HER2-Negative breast cancer patients, indicating the necessity of retesting HER2 low status at surgery, which may guide further therapy in the era of anti-HER2 ADCs.