The Effect of Aspirin Use on Incident Hepatocellular Carcinoma-An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The chemoprotective effect of anti-platelet agents on cancer incidence in people with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD): a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is associated with an increased incidence of hepatic and extrahepatic cancers, in particular those linked to obesity. In people with chronic liver disease, aspirin may confer protection against hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We explore the potential chemoprotective effect of aspirin/other anti-platelet agents on obesity-related cancers, including HCC in people with NAFLD.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study of anonymised electronic medical records using the TriNetX network (Cambridge, MA, USA), a global federated database. We identified adults aged 18 or over with a diagnosis of NAFLD, prior to commencing antiplatelet agents. Two groups were created: antiplatelet (1) versus no antiplatelet use (2). We propensity score matched for nine variables. Antiplatelet use was defined as aspirin, ticagrelor, cangrelor, clopidogrel or prasugrel use for at least 1 year. The outcomes of interest were incidence of HCC and other obesity-related cancers. Follow-up was for 5 years. We performed subgroup analyses on aspirin users only and stratified findings for sex and age. Sensitivity analysis was conducted on individuals with 3- and 5-year aspirin exposure.

RESULTS

Post matching, there were 42,192 people per group. Antiplatelet use in people with NAFLD was associated with statistically significant reduction in all obesity-related cancers (HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.65-0.78, p < 0.001) and individually for HCC (HR 0.52, 95% CI 0.40-0.68, p < 0.001), breast carcinoma (HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.66-0.92, p = 0.003), pancreatic carcinoma (HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.47-0.78, p < 0.001) and colorectal carcinoma (HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.56-0.84, p < 0.001). For women, there was a significant reduction in risk of ovarian carcinoma (HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.57-0.98, p = 0.034). Aspirin monotherapy was similarly associated with reduced incidence of HCC (HR 0.46, 95% CI 0.32-0.64, p < 0.001) and all obesity-related cancers (HR 0.71, 95% CI, 0.56-0.90, p = 0.004), with benefits observed in males (HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.56-0.90, p = 0.004), females (HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.67-0.88, p < 0.001) and in older (HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.63-0.82, p < 0.001) but not younger people (HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.60-1.03, p = 0.589).

CONCLUSIONS

Aspirin/antiplatelet agents may have a role in primary cancer prevention in people living with NAFLD.

Statin, aspirin and metformin use and risk of hepatocellular carcinoma related outcomes following liver transplantation: A retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Liver transplantation (LT) is a potentially curative therapy for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). HCC-recurrence following LT is associated with reduced survival. There is increasing interest in chemoprophylaxis to improve HCC-related outcomes post-LT.

AIM

To investigate whether there is any benefit for the use of drugs with proposed chemoprophylactic properties against HCC, and patient outcomes following LT.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of adult patients who received Deceased Donor LT for HCC from 2005-2022, from a single Australian centre. Drug use was defined as statin, aspirin or metformin therapy for ≥ 29 days, within 24 months post-LT. A cox proportional-hazards model with time-dependent covariates was used for survival analysis. Outcome measures were the composite-endpoint of HCC-recurrence and all-cause mortality, HCC-recurrence and HCC-related mortality. Sensitivity analysis was performed to account for immortality time bias and statin dosing.

RESULTS

Three hundred and five patients were included in this study, with 253 (82.95%) males with a median age of 58.90 years. Aetiologies of liver disease were 150 (49.18%) hepatitis C, 73 (23.93%) hepatitis B (HBV) and 33 (10.82%) non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). 56 (18.36%) took statins, 51 (16.72%) aspirin and 50 (16.39%) metformin. During a median follow-up time of 59.90 months, 34 (11.15%) developed HCC-recurrence, 48 (15.74%) died, 17 (5.57%) from HCC-related mortality. Statin, aspirin or metformin use was not associated with statistically significant differences in the composite endpoint of HCC-recurrence or all-cause mortality [hazard ratio (HR): 1.16, 95%CI: 0.58-2.30; HR: 1.21, 95%CI: 0.28-5.27; HR: 0.61, 95%CI: 0.27-1.36], HCC-recurrence (HR: 0.52, 95%CI: 0.20-1.35; HR: 0.51, 95%CI: 0.14-1.93; HR 1.00, 95%CI: 0.37-2.72), or HCC-related mortality (HR: 0.32, 95%CI: 0.033-3.09; HR: 0.71, 95%CI: 0.14-3.73; HR: 1.57, 95%CI: 0.61-4.04) respectively. Statin dosing was not associated with statistically significant differences in HCC-related outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Statin, metformin or aspirin use was not associated with improved HCC-related outcomes post-LT, in a largely historical cohort of Australian patients with a low proportion of NAFLD. Further prospective, multicentre studies are required to clarify any potential benefit of these drugs to improve HCC-related outcomes.

Effect of Low-Dose Aspirin Use After Thermal Ablation in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Retrospective Study

Purpose

To determine the effect of aspirin on hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recurrence and survival after thermal ablation.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of aspirin in combination with thermal ablation. The clinical data were collected for the enrolled patients. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events were analyzed.

Results

A total of 174 patients with HCC were enrolled. The median PFS was 11.1 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 8.1-14.0) months for patients who took aspirin and 8.6 (95% CI: 5.5-11.8) months for patients who did not take aspirin. The median OS of patients in the aspirin group was 76.7 (95% CI: 58.1-95.3) months and that in the non-aspirin group was 53.5 (95% CI: 42.7-64.3) months. In patients with non-viral HCC, OS was significantly better for the aspirin group (P = 0.03) after ablation. The PFS of patients who underwent ablation alone in the aspirin group was obviously superior to that of patients in the non-aspirin group (P = 0.002). Stratified Cox regression analysis demonstrated that aspirin use after ablation might be a protective factor in specific HCC patient subgroups. The incidence of major adverse events did not significantly differ between the two groups.

Conclusion

Low-dose aspirin use was associated with better OS in patients with non-viral HCC after thermal ablation. In patients who received thermal ablation alone, the administration of low-dose aspirin could improve PFS. Aspirin use might be a protective factor in some patients after ablation.

Exploring Aspirin's Potential in Cancer Prevention: A Comprehensive Review of the Current Evidence

Aspirin, traditionally recognized for its analgesic, anti-inflammatory, antipyretic, and antiplatelet effects, has recently attracted attention for its potential role in cancer prevention. Initially studied for cardiovascular disease prevention, emerging evidence suggests that aspirin may reduce the risk of certain cancers, particularly colorectal cancer (CRC). This narrative review integrates findings from early studies, animal models, epidemiological data, and clinical trials to evaluate aspirin's efficacy as a chemopreventive agent. Aspirin's anticancer effects are primarily attributed to its cyclooxygenase (COX) enzyme inhibition, which decreases prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) levels and disrupts cancer-related signaling pathways. While epidemiological studies support an association between aspirin use and reduced cancer incidence and mortality, especially for CRC and potentially for breast (BC) and prostate cancers (PCa), the risk of adverse effects, such as gastrointestinal (GI) and intracranial bleeding, complicates its use and warrants careful consideration. The decision to use aspirin for cancer prevention should be individualized, balancing its therapeutic benefits against potential adverse effects. It also underscores the necessity for further research to refine dosage guidelines, assess long-term impacts, and explore additional biomarkers to guide personalized cancer prevention strategies.

A review of MASLD-related hepatocellular carcinoma: progress in pathogenesis, early detection, and therapeutic interventions

The incidence of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is continuously rising, evolving into a global health challenge. Concurrently, cases of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) associated with MASLD are also on the increase. Although traditional risk factors such as age, gender, and metabolic factors play significant roles in the development of HCC, it cannot be overlooked that MASLD, triggered by changes in modern lifestyle and dietary habits, may also exacerbate the risk of HCC, and this phenomenon is common even among non-obese individuals. Regrettably, MASLD often fails to receive timely diagnosis, resulting in a limited number of patients receiving HCC surveillance. Moreover, there is currently a lack of clear definition for the target population for surveillance beyond patients with cirrhosis. Consequently, MASLD-related HCC is often detected at a late stage, precluding the optimal timing for curative treatment. However, our understanding of the pathogenesis and progression of HCC remains limited. Therefore, this paper reviews relevant literature from recent years, delving into multiple dimensions such as pathogenesis, surveillance and diagnosis, prevention, and treatment, aiming to provide new ideas and directions for the prevention and treatment of MASLD-related HCC.

Association between glycolysis markers and prognosis of liver cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

In recent years, the capacity of tumor cells to maintain high levels of glycolysis, even in the presence of oxygen, has emerged as one of the main metabolic traits and garnered considerable attention. The purpose of this meta-analysis is to investigate the prognostic value of glycolysis markers in liver cancer.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for articles on glycolytic marker expression levels associated with the prognosis of liver cancer until April 2023. Stata SE14.0 was used to calculate the aggregate hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals.

RESULTS

Thirty-five studies were included. The worse overall survival (OS) (P < 0.001), disease-free survival (DFS) (P = 0.001), recurrence-free survival (RFS) (P = 0.004), and time to recurrence (TTR) (P < 0.001) were significantly associated with elevated expression of glycolysis markers. Higher expression of PKM2 (P < 0.001), STMN1 (P = 0.002), MCT4 (P < 0.001), GLUT1 (P = 0.025), HK-2 (P < 0.001), and CA9 (P < 0.001) were significantly related to shorter OS. Increased levels of PKM2 (P < 0.001), CA9 (P = 0.005), and MCT4 (P < 0.001) were associated with worse DFS. Elevated PKM2 expression (P = 0.002) was also associated with poorer RFS in hepatocellular carcinoma patients. GLUT2 expression was not correlated with the prognosis of liver cancer (P = 0.134).

CONCLUSIONS

Elevated expression of glycolysis markers was associated with worse OS, DFS, RFS, and TTR in patients with liver cancer. Therefore, these glycolysis markers could serve as potential prognostic markers and therapeutic targets in liver cancer.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO registration: CRD42023469645.

Don't Judge a Book by Its Cover: The Role of Statins in Liver Cancer

Statins, which are inhibitors of 3-hydroxy-3-methyl-glutaryl-coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase, are an effective pharmacological tool for lowering blood cholesterol levels. This property makes statins one of the most popular drugs used primarily to prevent cardiovascular diseases, where hyperlipidemia is a significant risk factor that increases mortality. Nevertheless, studies conducted mainly in the last decade have shown that statins might prevent and treat liver cancer, one of the leading causes of cancer-related mortality worldwide. This narrative review summarizes the scientific achievements to date regarding the role of statins in liver tumors. Molecular biology tools have revealed that cell growth and proliferation can be inhibited by statins, which further inhibit angiogenesis. Clinical studies, supported by meta-analysis, confirm that statins are highly effective in preventing and treating hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma. However, this effect may depend on the statin's type and dose, and more clinical trials are required to evaluate clinical effects. Moreover, their potential hepatotoxicity is a significant caveat for using statins in clinical practice. Nevertheless, this group of drugs, initially developed to prevent cardiovascular diseases, is now a key candidate in hepato-oncology patient management. The description of new drug-statin-like structures, e.g., with low toxicity to liver cells, may bring another clinically significant improvement to current cancer therapies.