Risk-Stratified Therapy for Pediatric Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Prognostic factors and outcomes in pediatric acute myeloid leukemia: a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of global research trends

Background

Pediatric AML prognosis research has advanced significantly, yet gaps in understanding genetic and molecular interactions persist. Despite improved outcomes, relapse/refractory cases and personalized treatment integration remain critical clinical challenges.

Objective

To analyze the global research landscape on pediatric AML prognosis, highlight influential components and collaborations, and identify major potential research trends.

Methods

Publications on pediatric AML prognosis research from 1999 to 2023 were retrieved from the Clarivate Analytics Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) database. Bibliometric analysis was conducted using CiteSpace and VOSviewer to identify leading countries, prominent institutions, high-impact journals, key research categories, influential authors, and emerging research topics.

Results

The bibliometric analysis encompassed 924 publications, with St. Jude Children's Research Hospital emerging as the most prolific institution. The United States leads globally in terms of countries, institutions, journals, and authors. Todd A. Alonzo ranks highest in publication volume, while U. Creutzig leads in citations. The top research categories were Oncology, Hematology, and Pediatrics. Key research topics included genomics, transcriptomics, epigenomics, targeted therapies, immune therapy, and integrative diagnostic approaches.

Conclusion

This bibliometric analysis highlights significant advancements in pediatric AML prognosis over the past 25 years, driven by the integration of genetic markers, immunological insights, transcriptomics, and epigenomics, which have collectively transformed risk stratification and treatment strategies. Overcoming challenges, such as discovering new therapeutic targets and enhancing treatment combinations, will depend on global collaboration and advanced technologies to propel the field forward.

Unveiling unexpected adverse events: post-marketing safety surveillance of gilteritinib and midostaurin from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting database

Background

Gilteritinib and midostaurin are FLT3 inhibitors that have made significant progress in the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia. However, their real-world safety profile in a large sample population is incomplete.

Objectives

We aimed to provide a pharmacovigilance study of the adverse events (AEs) associated with gilteritinib and midostaurin through the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database.

Design

A retrospective analysis of the FAERS database was conducted by disproportionality analyses.

Methods

We conducted disproportionality analyses to identify drug-AE associations, including the reporting odds ratio and the Bayesian confidence propagation neural network. A signal was detected if both methods achieved statistical significance.

Results

There were 1887 and 2091 case reports for gilteritinib and midostaurin, respectively. We have separately retained significant disproportionality AEs across two algorithms, with a total of 53 AEs for gilteritinib and 46 for midostaurin. The common AEs observed with gilteritinib included febrile neutropenia, pyrexia, anemia, and thrombocytopenia. Similarly, the prevalent AEs associated with midostaurin were nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, pyrexia, and febrile neutropenia. The common AEs of both drugs are consistent with previous clinical trials. Notably, we also revealed unexpected significant AEs for both drugs. For gilteritinib, 29 positive signals for AEs not mentioned in its instructions were identified, such as cerebral hemorrhage, tumor lysis syndrome, and interstitial lung disease. Midostaurin exhibited 24 positive signals for AEs not listed in its instructions, including neutropenic colitis, neutropenic sepsis, and septic shock.

Conclusion

This study highlights the need for continued monitoring and evaluation of these drugs in clinical practice, as it first reveals their AEs in a large real-world sample population. Some AEs are generally consistent with the instructions and previous studies, but some unexpected AEs are detected for each drug. Due to the limitations of the spontaneous report database, such as including potential underreporting, overreporting, lack of causal relationship, unable to calculate incidence, and other confounding factors, more pharmacoepidemiology studies are needed to validate our findings.

Flow cytometry in acute myeloid leukemia and detection of minimal residual disease

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a common type of acute leukemia (AL), belonging to malignant tumors of the hematopoietic system with the characteristics of rapid disease development, control with extreme difficulties, easy recurrence, poor prognosis, and incidence rate increasing with age. The traditionally diagnostic standard of French American British (FAB), being based on the morphological examination with high human subjectivity, can no longer meet the demand of clinical diagnosis and treatment of AML. Requirements of objective accuracy and low-dose sample, have become the indispensable method for AML diagnosis and monitoring prognosis. Flow cytometry is a modern technology that can quickly and accurately detect the series, antigen distribution, differentiation stage of AML cells, minimal residual lesions after AML therapy, so as to provide the great significance in guiding clinical diagnosis, hierarchical treatment, and prognosis judgement. This article will systematically elaborate on the application of flow cytometry in the diagnosis and classification of AML, and the detection of minimal residual lesions, thereby providing reference significance for dynamic monitoring and prognostic observation of AML with different immune subtypes of FAB.

Intensive chemotherapy with dual induction and ALL-like consolidation for childhood acute myeloid leukemia: a respective report from multiple centers in China

Background

Pediatric acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has poor prognosis and high rate of relapse and mortality, and exploration of new treatment options is still critically needed.

Objectives

To summarize the outcome of our new treatment strategies for pediatric AML, which is characterized by dual induction and acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) elements consolidation.

Design

Retrospective, single-arm study.

Methods

From July 2012 to December 2019, an intensive chemotherapy protocol was used for newly diagnosed children with AML, which contains dual induction, three courses of consolidations based on high-dose cytarabine, and two courses of consolidations composed of high-dose methotrexate, vincristine, asparaginase, and mercaptopurine (ALL-like elements). Blasts were monitored by bone marrow smears at intervals, and two lumbar punctures were performed during chemotherapy. We retrospectively analyzed the efficacy and safety of this study. The last follow-up was on 26 May 2023.

Results

A total of 70 pediatric AMLs were included. The median age at diagnosis was 6.7 (0.5-16.0) years. The median initial WBC count was 23.74 × 109/L, 11 of whom ⩾100 × 109/L. After dual induction, there were 62 cases of complete remission (CR), 5 cases of partial remission, and 3 cases of nonremission. The CR rate was 88.57%. The median follow-up time was 5.8 (0.2-9.4) years, the 5-year overall survival was 78.2% ± 5%, the event-free survival (EFS) was 71.2% ± 5.6%, and the cumulative recurrence rate was 27.75%. The 5-year EFS of patients with initial WBC < 100 × 109/L (n = 59) and ⩾100 × 109/L (n = 11) were 76.4% ± 5.7% and 45.5% ± 15% (p = 0.013), respectively. A total of 650 hospital infections occurred. The main causes of infection were respiratory tract infection (26.92%), septicemia (18.46%), stomatitis (11.85%), and skin and soft-tissue infection (10.46%).

Conclusion

This intensive treatment protocol with dual induction and ALL-like elements is effective and safe for childhood AML. Initial WBC ⩾ 100 × 109/L was the only independent risk factor in this cohort.

Trial registration

It is a retrospective study, and no registration on ClinicalTrials.gov.

Clinical practice guidelines for molecular tumor marker, 2nd edition review part 2

In recent years, rapid advancement in gene/protein analysis technology has resulted in target molecule identification that may be useful in cancer treatment. Therefore, "Clinical Practice Guidelines for Molecular Tumor Marker, Second Edition" was published in Japan in September 2021. These guidelines were established to align the clinical usefulness of external diagnostic products with the evaluation criteria of the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency. The guidelines were scoped for each tumor, and a clinical questionnaire was developed based on a serious clinical problem. This guideline was based on a careful review of the evidence obtained through a literature search, and recommendations were identified following the recommended grades of the Medical Information Network Distribution Services (Minds). Therefore, this guideline can be a tool for cancer treatment in clinical practice. We have already reported the review portion of "Clinical Practice Guidelines for Molecular Tumor Marker, Second Edition" as Part 1. Here, we present the English version of each part of the Clinical Practice Guidelines for Molecular Tumor Marker, Second Edition.