Staging Investigations in Asymptomatic Early Breast Cancer Patients at the Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario

Environmental Sustainability and Cancer Imaging

The rising global burden of cancer drives increased demands for medical imaging, which is essential throughout cancer care. However, delivering medical imaging presents significant environmental challenges including high energy use, reliance on single-use supplies, and the production of environmental pollutants. Environmental factors, such as ultraviolet radiation, wildfire smoke, and carcinogenic pollutants contribute to rising cancer rates, while extreme weather events driven by climate change disrupt cancer care delivery-highlighting the close connection between patient and planetary health. This review explores opportunities to improve the environmental sustainability of oncologic imaging, emphasizing the importance of patient-relevant outcomes-such as quality of life and overall survival-as a guiding principle in cancer care. Key strategies include optimizing imaging schedules to reduce low-value imaging, selecting modalities with lower environmental impact where clinically appropriate, minimizing waste streams, and adopting energy-efficient practices. Artificial intelligence offers the potential to personalize imaging schedules and improve efficiency, though its benefits must be weighed against energy use. Mobile imaging programs and integrated scheduling reduce patient travel-related emissions while promoting health equity, particularly in underserved communities. Future research should focus on optimizing imaging intervals to address patient-relevant outcomes better, expanding the use of abbreviated imaging protocols, and the judicious deployment of artificial intelligence, ensuring its benefits justify energy use.

Can Ki-67 serve as a suitable marker to indicate the necessity of staging diagnostics in cases of low-risk breast cancer?

BACKGROUND

For many years, staging tests have not been routinely employed for low-risk early breast cancer (EBC). However, the role of Ki-67 in determining the need for staging tests in low-risk EBC remains unclear. Our study aimed to assess the number and types of staging diagnostics, additional imaging, false-positive results, and rate of distant metastases in low-risk EBC with low and high Ki-67 (< / ≥ 25%).

METHODS

This is a retrospective, single institution cohort study. All patients with newly diagnosed low-risk breast cancer at the University Medical Center in Freiburg in 2017 and 2021 were included. Low-risk was defined as clinical tumor stage T1/2, node negative (N0), hormone receptor positive, HER2 negative, asymptomatic EBC. Information on demographics, clinical and pathological characteristics, as well as number and type of performed staging diagnostics was obtained. Rate and type of additional imaging or follow-up diagnostics due to suspicious findings was analyzed. The patients were divided into two groups (Ki-67 < and ≥ 25%) and rates of distant metastases, performed staging diagnostics and false positive rates were compared.

RESULTS

A total of 189 patients with low-risk EBC were identified, with 54% (n = 102) having Ki-67 < 25% and 46% (n = 87) having Ki-67 ≥ 25%. Risk for distant metastases was 0% in Ki-67 < 25% and 1.1% in patients with Ki-67 ≥ 25% (p = 0.46). Due to suspicious findings in the initial staging diagnostic, additional imaging was required for 11.8% (n = 12) of patients with Ki-67 < 25% compared to 19.5% (n = 17) of patients with Ki-67 ≥ 25% (p = 0.16). False positive rates did not differ significantly between the two groups (7.6% in Ki-67 < 25% vs. 9.8% in Ki-67 ≥ 25%; p = 0.55).

CONCLUSION

Distant metastases are rare in low-risk EBC. All in all, staging diagnostics should not be routinely employed in this patient population. Only patients with high Ki-67 developed distant metastases. In these cases, staging diagnostics may be discussed with the patient.

Guidance for Canadian Breast Cancer Practice: National Consensus Recommendations for Clinical Staging of Patients Newly Diagnosed with Breast Cancer

The accurate staging of breast cancer is fundamental for guiding treatment decisions and predicting patient outcomes. However, there can be considerable variation in routine clinical practice based on individual interpretation of guidelines and depending on the healthcare provider initially involved in working up patients newly diagnosed with breast cancer, ranging from primary care providers, triage nurses, surgeons, and/or oncologists. The optimal approach for clinical staging, particularly in asymptomatic patients presenting with intermediate-risk disease, remains a topic of dialogue among clinicians. Given this area of uncertainty, the Research Excellence, Active Leadership (REAL) Canadian Breast Cancer Alliance conducted a modified Delphi process to assess the level of agreement among Canadian expert clinicians on various staging recommendations. In total, 20 items were drafted covering staging based on biological status, the utilization of localization clips, both for the axilla during diagnosis and primary surgical site for margins and radiation therapy planning, and the use of advanced imaging for the investigation of distant metastases. Overall, the consensus threshold among all participants (i.e., ≥75% agreement) was reached in 20/20 items. Differences in clinical practice and recent findings from the literature are provided in the discussion. These consensus recommendations are meant to help standardize breast cancer staging practices in Canada, ensuring accurate diagnosis and optimal treatment planning.

Pan-Asian adapted ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for the diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of patients with early breast cancer

The European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) Clinical Practice Guidelines for the diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of patients with early breast cancer were updated and published online in 2023, and adapted, according to previously established standard methodology, to produce the Pan-Asian adapted (PAGA) ESMO consensus guidelines for the management of Asian patients with early breast cancer. The adapted guidelines presented in this manuscript represent the consensus opinions reached by a panel of Asian experts in the treatment of patients with breast cancer representing the oncological societies of China (CSCO), Indonesia (ISHMO), India (ISMPO), Japan (JSMO), Korea (KSMO), Malaysia (MOS), the Philippines (PSMO), Singapore (SSO), Taiwan (TOS) and Thailand (TSCO), co-ordinated by ESMO and KSMO. The voting was based on scientific evidence and was independent of the current treatment practices, drug access restrictions and reimbursement decisions in the different Asian regions represented by the 10 oncological societies. The latter are discussed separately in the manuscript. The aim is to provide guidance for the optimisation and harmonisation of the management of patients with early breast cancer across the different regions of Asia, drawing on the evidence provided by both Western and Asian trials, whilst respecting the differences in screening practices, molecular profiling, as well as the age and stage at presentation. Attention is drawn to the disparity in the drug approvals and reimbursement strategies, between the different regions of Asia.

Evaluating the Role of Breast Ultrasound in Early Detection of Breast Cancer in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Comprehensive Narrative Review

Breast cancer, affecting both genders, but mostly females, exhibits shifting demographic patterns, with an increasing incidence in younger age groups. Early identification through mammography, clinical examinations, and breast self-exams enhances treatment efficacy, but challenges persist in low- and medium-income countries due to limited imaging resources. This review assesses the feasibility of employing breast ultrasound as the primary breast cancer screening method, particularly in resource-constrained regions. Following the PRISMA guidelines, this study examines 52 publications from the last five years. Breast ultrasound, distinct from mammography, offers advantages like radiation-free imaging, suitability for repeated screenings, and preference for younger populations. Real-time imaging and dense breast tissue evaluation enhance sensitivity, accessibility, and cost-effectiveness. However, limitations include reduced specificity, operator dependence, and challenges in detecting microcalcifications. Automatic breast ultrasound (ABUS) addresses some issues but faces constraints like potential inaccuracies and limited microcalcification detection. The analysis underscores the need for a comprehensive approach to breast cancer screening, emphasizing international collaboration and addressing limitations, especially in resource-constrained settings. Despite advancements, notably with ABUS, the primary goal is to contribute insights for optimizing breast cancer screening globally, improving outcomes, and mitigating the impact of this debilitating disease.

Critical assessment of resource waste in staging and follow-up of breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer is a public health problem with both high incidence and cure rates. After treatment, patients are monitored for long periods of time due to the risk of recurrence. Thus, staging and follow-up strategies should consider not only the best results for the patient but also its costs for the public health system.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to quantify the waste of resources on breast cancer follow-up and evaluate its impact on the public health system.

METHODS

This is a retrospective analysis of consecutive medical records to identify the intervals between consultations and tests used for staging and during the first 2 years of follow-up of patients with breast cancer treated at a public hospital in Brazil. Data were compared with the guidelines of the main international consensus.

RESULTS

Medical records of 60 consecutive patients treated in 2018 were selected, of whom 52 had 2 or more years of follow-up, and 8 had only 1 year of complete follow-up. A total of 34 patients (56.67%) underwent excessive examinations for stating. During follow-up, 125 surplus consultations were performed (33.6%). In this phase, 111 surplus exams were also performed, representing an increase of 100.9%. A total of 423 laboratory tests were performed for 18 patients in the first year and 229 tests for 14 patients in the second year.

CONCLUSION

Excessive tests and consultations significantly burdened the Unified Health System without any benefit to patients. Better adherence to staging and follow-up recommendations could reduce costs and optimize the limited resources used in the public health system.

Staging for Breast Cancer: A Nationwide Survey about Adherence to Guidelines in German Breast Centers

Introduction: The risk for metastasis at primary diagnosis of breast cancer is about 4%. The German guidelines give clear indications for when, whom and how to stage breast cancer patients. Ideally, this should be done via CAT scan of the thorax and abdomen and an additional bone scan. But daily practice shows that the way health care providers handle staging recommendations can vary. To objectify adherence to guidelines we started a nation-wide survey. Methods: Between July and September 2020 we sent out a survey via email to all certified and non certified breast centers and in addition to all Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology in Germany. We asked for timing of staging, conditions that cause staging and the applied method. In case we did not get back any reply we sent out a reminder. Results: A total of 220 certified breast centers/28 non-certified breast center/48 Departments of Gynecology and Obstetrics who care for breast cancer patients took part in our survey. A general pre-therapeutic staging was performed in 16,4%/39,3%/66,7% of all institutions and a general post-operative staging was performed in 4,1%/0%/6,3% of each institutional type, respectively. In terms of the applied method, 75% of all certified breast centers used a CAT scan and bone scan, while 23,3% primarily use chest x-ray, ultrasound of the abdomen (27,7%) or MRI. As a potential reason for using x-ray and ultrasound the presence of a „low-risk“ breast cancer was mentioned. Summary: Although certified breast centers show the highest adherence to current guidelines, some still perform a general staging or do not use the recommended staging method. The low probability for primary metastatic breast cancer and the use of a reasonable exposure to radiation warrant a critical discussion.