1
|
Peters MJM, Wierts R, Jutten EMC, Broos WAM, Ter Laak MP, Willems PC. 18F-fluoride PET/CT as an early predictor of bony fusion after posterior lumbar interbody fusion- a prospective study. J Orthop Surg Res 2025; 20:458. [PMID: 40355955 PMCID: PMC12070508 DOI: 10.1186/s13018-025-05814-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2024] [Accepted: 04/12/2025] [Indexed: 05/15/2025] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion (PLIF) is a surgical procedure in which stabilization of spinal segments is achieved by inserting interbody cages filled with bone graft. Positron Emission Tomography (PET) is an imaging modality to assess physiological processes at cellular level, well before manifestation of morphological changes on computed tomography (CT). The goal was to determine whether 18F-fluoride PET/CT findings six weeks after PLIF, can predict bony fusion one year postoperatively on CT. MATERIALS AND METHODS 20 consecutive PLIF patients (21 levels) were prospectively included. Based on diagnostic CT one year postoperatively, operated segments were classified as pseudarthrotic or fused. 18F-fluoride PET/CT scanning was performed at six weeks and one year, yielding parameters related to overall bone metabolism, bone blood flow and bone mineral incorporation. Differences in PET parameters between groups and follow-up moments were assessed. The area under the curve from the receiver operating characteristic was calculated for each PET parameter as a measure of diagnostic accuracy. RESULTS 11 segments were classified as pseudarthrotic and 10 as fused. Pseudarthrotic segments showed lower intervertebral overall bone metabolism values compared to fused segments at six weeks. Pseudarthrotic segments showed lower intervertebral bone blood flow at six weeks and lower intervertebral bone mineral incorporation at one year compared to fused segments. Overall bone metabolism of the operated intervertebral disc space at six weeks had the highest diagnostic accuracy for predicting the fusion status at one year. CONCLUSIONS 18F-fluoride PET/CT six weeks after PLIF provides prognostic information on bony fusion at one year.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marloes J M Peters
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Roel Wierts
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Radiology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Elisabeth M C Jutten
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Wouter A M Broos
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Albert Schweitzer Ziekenhuis, Dordrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Mariel P Ter Laak
- Department of Neurosurgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Paul C Willems
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
de Ruiter RD, Zwama J, Raijmakers PGHM, Yaqub M, Burchell GL, Boellaard R, Lammertsma AA, Eekhoff EMW. Validation of quantitative [ 18F]NaF PET uptake parameters in bone diseases: a systematic review. Ann Nucl Med 2025; 39:98-149. [PMID: 39729191 PMCID: PMC11799077 DOI: 10.1007/s12149-024-01991-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2024] [Accepted: 10/07/2024] [Indexed: 12/28/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE [18F]NaF PET has become an increasingly important tool in clinical practice toward understanding and evaluating diseases and conditions in which bone metabolism is disrupted. Full kinetic analysis using nonlinear regression (NLR) with a two-tissue compartment model to determine the net rate of influx (Ki) of [18F]NaF is considered the gold standard for quantification of [18F]NaF uptake. However, dynamic scanning often is impractical in a clinical setting, leading to the development of simplified semi-quantitative parameters. This systematic review investigated which uptake parameters have been used to evaluate bone disorders and how they have been validated to measure disease activity. METHODS A literature search (in PubMed, Embase.com, and Clarivate Analytics/Web of Science Core Collection) was performed up to 28th November 2023, in collaboration with an information specialist. Each database was searched for relevant literature regarding the use of [18F]NAF PET/CT to measure disease activity in bone-related disorders. The main aim was to explore whether the reported semi-quantitative uptake values were validated against full kinetic analysis. A second aim was to investigate whether the chosen uptake parameter correlated with a disease-specific outcome or marker, validating its use as a clinical outcome or disease marker. RESULTS The initial search included 1636 articles leading to 92 studies spanning 29 different bone-related conditions in which [18F]NaF PET was used to quantify [18F]NaF uptake. In 12 bone-related disorders, kinetic analysis was performed and compared with simplified uptake parameters. SUVmean (standardized uptake value) and SUVmax were used most frequently, though normalization of these values varied greatly between studies. In some disorders, various studies were performed evaluating [18F]NaF uptake as a marker of bone metabolism, but unfortunately, not all studies used this same approach, making it difficult to compare results between those studies. CONCLUSION When using [18F]NaF PET to evaluate disease activity or treatment response in various bone-related disorders, it is essential to detail scanning protocols and analytical procedures. The most accurate outcome parameter can only be obtained through kinetic analysis and is better suited for research. Simplified uptake parameters are better suited for routine clinical practice and repeated measurements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruben D de Ruiter
- Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Rare Bone Disease Center, Amsterdam University Medical Centers (UMC), Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jolien Zwama
- Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Rare Bone Disease Center, Amsterdam University Medical Centers (UMC), Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Pieter G H M Raijmakers
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers (UMC), Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maqsood Yaqub
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers (UMC), Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Ronald Boellaard
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers (UMC), Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Adriaan A Lammertsma
- Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Elisabeth M W Eekhoff
- Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Rare Bone Disease Center, Amsterdam University Medical Centers (UMC), Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Corona-Cedillo R, Saavedra-Navarrete MT, Espinoza-Garcia JJ, Mendoza-Aguilar AN, Ternovoy SK, Roldan-Valadez E. Imaging Assessment of the Postoperative Spine: An Updated Pictorial Review of Selected Complications. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL 2021; 2021:9940001. [PMID: 34113681 PMCID: PMC8154286 DOI: 10.1155/2021/9940001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2021] [Revised: 04/25/2021] [Accepted: 05/05/2021] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
Imaging of the postoperative spine requires the identification of several critical points by the radiologist to be written in the medical report: condition of the underlying cortical and cancellous bone, intervertebral disc, and musculoskeletal tissues; location and integrity of surgical implants; evaluation of the success of decompression procedures; delineation of fusion status; and identification of complications. This article presents a pictorial narrative review of the most common findings observed in noninstrumented and instrumented postoperative spines. Complications in the noninstrumented spine were grouped in early (hematomas, pseudomeningocele, and postoperative spine infection) and late findings (arachnoiditis, radiculitis, recurrent disc herniation, spinal stenosis, and textiloma). Complications in the instrumented spine were also sorted in early (hardware fractures) and late findings (adjacent segment disease, hardware loosening, and implant migration). This review also includes a short description of the most used diagnostic techniques in postoperative spine imaging: plain radiography, ultrasound (US), computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance (MR), and nuclear medicine. Imaging of the postoperative spine remained a challenging task in the early identification of complications and abnormal healing process. It is crucial to consider the advantages and disadvantages of the imaging modalities to choose those that provide more accurate spinal status information during the follow-up. Our review is directed to all health professionals dealing with the assessment and care of the postoperative spine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberto Corona-Cedillo
- Neuroimaging Department, National Institute of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Mexico City, Mexico
| | | | | | | | - Sergey K. Ternovoy
- Department of Radiology, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), 119992 Moscow, Russia
- A.L. Myasnikov Research Institute of Clinical Cardiology of National Medical Research Center of Cardiology of the Ministry of Health of Russia, 127005 Moscow, Russia
| | - Ernesto Roldan-Valadez
- Directorate of Research, Hospital General de Mexico “Dr. Eduardo Liceaga”, Mexico City, Mexico
- Department of Radiology, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), 119992 Moscow, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Raynor WY, Borja AJ, Hancin EC, Werner TJ, Alavi A, Revheim ME. Novel Musculoskeletal and Orthopedic Applications of 18F-Sodium Fluoride PET. PET Clin 2021; 16:295-311. [PMID: 33589389 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpet.2020.12.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
PET imaging with 18F-sodium fluoride (NaF), combined with computed tomography or magnetic resonance, is a sensitive method of assessing bone turnover. Although NaF-PET is gaining popularity in detecting prostate cancer metastases to bone marrow, osseous changes represent secondary effects of cancer cell growth. PET tracers more appropriate for assessing prostate cancer metastases directly portray malignant activity and include 18F-fluciclovine and prostatic specific membrane antigen ligands. Recent studies investigating NaF-PET suggest utility in the assessment of benign musculoskeletal disorders. Emerging applications in assessing traumatic injuries, joint disease, back pain, orthopedic complications, and metabolic bone disease are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William Y Raynor
- Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Drexel University College of Medicine, 2900 West Queen Lane, Philadelphia, PA 19129, USA
| | - Austin J Borja
- Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Civic Center Boulevard, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Emily C Hancin
- Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, 3500 North Broad Street, Philadelphia, PA 19140, USA
| | - Thomas J Werner
- Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Abass Alavi
- Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Mona-Elisabeth Revheim
- Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Division of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Sognsvannsveien 20, Oslo 0372, Norway; Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Problemveien 7, Oslo 0315, Norway.
| |
Collapse
|