Exploring Association of Breast Pain, Pregnancy, and Body Mass Index with Breast Tissue Elasticity in Healthy Women: Glandular and Fat Differences

Factors Associated with False Positive Breast Cancer Results in the Real-Time Sonoelastography Evaluation of Solid Breast Lesions

Background and Objectives: Breast cancer is one of the most widespread cancers among the female population around the world and is curable if diagnosed in an early stage. Consequently, breast cancer screening imaging techniques have greatly evolved and adjusted over the last decades. Alongside mammography, sonoelastography became an important tool for breast cancer detection. However, sonoelastography still has its limitations, namely, there is still a high occurrence of false positive results in the BIRADS 4 category. The aim of our study is to identify potential false positive predictors and to ascertain the factors influencing the quality of strain ultrasound elastography for the evaluation of suspicious solid breast lesions categorized as BIRADS 4B, 4C, and 5. Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective study in a single private medical center in Timisoara between January 2017 and January 2022 analyzing 1625 solid breast lesions by the sonoelastography strain using a standardized BIRADS-US lexicon. Results: Our study showed that most sonoelastography factors linked to incorrect and overdiagnosis were due to a nodule dimension (OR = 1.02 per unit increase), posterior acoustic shadowing (OR = 12.26), reactive adenopathy (OR = 6.35), and an increased TES score (TES3 OR = 6.60; TES4 OR = 23.02; TES5 OR = 108.24). Regarding patient characteristics, age (OR = 1.09 per unit increase), BMI, (OR = 1.09 per unit increase), and breastfeeding history (OR = 3.00) were observed to increase the likelihood of false positive results. On the other hand, the nodules less likely to be part of the false positive group exhibited the following characteristics: a regular shape (OR = 0.27), homogenous consistency (OR = 0.42), and avascularity (OR = 0.22). Conclusions: Older age, high BMI, patients with a breastfeeding history, and those who exhibit the following specific nodule characteristics were most often linked to false positive results: large tumors with posterior acoustic shadowing and high elasticity scores, accompanied by reactive adenopathy. On the other hand, homogenous, avascular nodules with regular shapes were less likely to be misdiagnosed.

Evaluation of Multiparametric Shear Wave Elastography Indices in Malignant and Benign Breast Lesions

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the shear wave elastography indices (multiparametric SWE) of breast lesions based on patient and lesion dependent features and assess the contribution of different elastographic parameters to radiological diagnosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Effect of patient-dependent (age and menopausal status) and lesion-dependent (distance from the areola, quadrant location, size, depth, margin and shape) factors on SWE parameters (Vmean, Vsd, Vmax, Vmin) in benign breast lesions were assessed. Only mass lesions were included in the study. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and cut-off values for each elastography parameter was calculated.

RESULTS

A total of 496 mass lesions of breast were evaluated. 467 of the lesions were benign and 29 were malignant. There was no significant relationship among SWE indices and age, menopausal status, lesion shape and distance to the areola in benign lesions (p>0.05). SWE indices were found to be associated with lesion margin, depth from the skin, and lesion size in benign lesions (p<0.05). All BI-RADS 3 lesions that underwent biopsy were benign (n:35); 23.5% of 4a lesions were malignant (n:4/17) and all 4b-4c-5 lesions were malignant (n:25/25). The cut-off values for malignant lesions were: Vmean 3.38 m/s, Vsd 0.81, Vmax 6.87 m/s, Vmin 1.53 m/s. All SWE parameters were statistically significant in predicting malignancy on ROC analysis, Vmax was the most sensitive (96.3%) and specific (94.7%) parameter. Cut-off values for Vmax was 6.87 m/s with an accuracy rate of 94.7%, and 3.37 m/s for Vmean and 0.8 for Vsd with 92.5% accuracy.

CONCLUSION

The SWE parameters to predict malignancy in breast lesions can be affected by lesion dependent features, whereas no significant effect of patient's age or menopausal status on stiffness of the lesions was observed. Vmax had the highest sensitivity for predicting malignancy.

Evaluation of the Effect of Age, Menopausal Status, and Parity on Breast Parenchyma Stiffness by Multiparametric Shear Wave Elastography

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the relationship between quantitative breast parenchyma stiffness by using multiparametric shear wave elastography (mpSWE) and the potential risk factors of breast cancer.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The Vmean, Vmax, Vmin, Vsd values were measured with mpSWE from each breast and each quadrant in all cases under and over the age of 40. Statistical analysis was performed to evaluate the relationship between breast stiffness and age, side, quadrant, menopausal status, mammographic breast density, and obstetric history.

RESULTS

The study cohort included 964 breasts of 482 patients, where 342 patients were ≥40 years of age; and 140 cases were <40 years of age with a mean age of 45.07 ± 10.96. No significant difference in breast stiffness was detected between right and left breasts (p > 0.05); however, upper quadrants were found to be stiffer than the lower quadrants (p < 0.05). The effect of age on all values was found to be significant (p < 0.05), and stiffness increased with age. All mpSWE values of post-menopausal cases were significantly higher (p < 0.05) than premenopausal cases. Nulliparous cases had higher values than cases with prior parity (p < 0.05). Cases with Type C and D breast density had higher stiffness values than those with Type A and Type B breast density.

CONCLUSION

Breast parenchyma shows increased stiffness in in post-menopausal, nulliparous and older patients and patients with dense breast density. Similar to the mammographic increased breast density, elastographically increased breast parenchymal stiffness may be used as a possible risk factor for breast cancer or as a predictor of breast cancer.

Epidemiology and Predictive Factors for Persistent Breast Pain Following Breast-Conserving Surgery

Background

In general, breast pain is one of the most common causes for referral to breast units; treatment-related breast pain is frequently seen in clinical practice but not well addressed in the literature. While our primary objective was to identify the incidence of persistent breast pain following breast-conserving surgery and possible risk factors, our secondary aim was to assess the possibility of using a breast ultrasound scan to detect parenchymal changes that can contribute to breast pain.

Methods

We have conducted a prospective study including patients who had wide local excision for primary breast cancer treatment between January 2017 and January 2019. Patients’ demographics, including age, BMI, breast volume, and tumour characteristics, were noted. All patients had a clinical assessment and were asked standard questions about their breast pain each visit; they also had an ultrasound scan of the breast and axilla 6 and 12 months after surgery to look for parenchymal changes.

Results

A total of 239 female breast cancer patients were included in our analysis. The mean age was 43.9 years, mean weight was 72.8 kg, mean BMI was 27.4 and mean breast volume was 1173 ml. In total, 38.5% had standard wide local excision, and 61.5% had oncoplastic resection; the mean specimen weight was 74.6 grams. All patients had adjuvant whole breast radiotherapy. We found that patients with younger age, larger breast size, high BMI, oncoplastic resections, and persistent parenchymal changes are associated with an increased incidence of postoperative breast pain while the type of axillary procedure and adjuvant chemotherapy had no significant effect.

Conclusion

Persistent postoperative breast pain was noted in 33% of our patients. We have also indicated that younger patients, patients with larger breast, those with high BMI, with preoperative breast pain, who had oncoplastic resections, and patients with persistent parenchymal changes, as fat necrosis and scarring, are associated more with persistent breast pain.

Association between body mass index and localization of breast cancer: results from a nationwide inpatient database in Japan

PURPOSE

Although both localization of breast cancer and body mass index (BMI) are associated with prognosis, the association between localization of breast cancer and BMI remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the association between localization of breast cancer and BMI at diagnosis.

METHODS

Patients who underwent surgery for stage 0-III breast cancer July 2010-March 2017 were identified retrospectively in a Japanese nationwide inpatient database. Multinomial logistic regression analyses adjusting for patient's age were conducted to compare the outcomes among five BMI groups: < 18.5 kg/m² (n = 31,724; 9.3%), 18.5-24.9 kg/m² (n = 218,244; 64.3%), 25.0-29.9 kg/m² (n = 69,813; 20.6%), 30.0-34.9 kg/m² (n = 16,052; 4.7%), and ≥ 35.0 kg/m² (n = 3716; 1.1%). The outcomes were the quadrant and side of the breast where tumors were detected.

RESULTS

In total, about half of the patients had breast cancer in the upper-outer quadrant (49.7%) and in the left breast (51.1%). In the multinomial analysis, BMI ≥ 25.0 kg/m² was associated with the occurrence of breast cancer in the upper-inner and lower-outer quadrants and in the central area, whereas BMI < 18.5 kg/m² was associated with the occurrence of breast cancer in the central area only. The side of breast cancer did not differ significantly among the five BMI groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Localization of breast cancer was associated with BMI in this large nationwide cohort. The findings may benefit patients' self-checks and doctors' examinations, potentially resulting in early detection and treatment.