Evaluation of Crohn's Disease Small-Bowel Mucosal Healing Using Capsule Endoscopy and Usefulness of Leucine-Rich α2-Glycoprotein

The usefulness of serum leucine-rich alpha-2 glycoprotein as a novel biomarker in monitoring inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a condition of unknown origin. It does not have a definite cure and its response to various treatments can be evaluated based on symptom-based measures, invasive procedures, or biomarker levels, highlighting the need for an accurate biomarker. Since C-reactive protein (CRP) and fecal calprotectin have their shortcomings, the need for a novel biomarker remains critical. Systematic searches of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase were performed In January 2024. PROSPERO number is CRD42024507383. We assessed the accuracy of leucine-rich alpha-2 glycoprotein (LRG) in identifying disease activity among patients with IBD using a bivariate diagnostic random-effects model. Fourteen studies involving 1794 individuals conducted in Japan were selected for our systematic review. The sensitivity and specificity of LRG levels for detecting disease activity were analyzed in patients with IBD and in two subgroups (ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease). The synthesized sensitivity and specificity were 75.4% [95% confidence interval (CI), 68.9-80.9%] and 77.3% (95% CI, 69.9-83.2%), respectively, in patients with IBD, 73.1% (95% CI, 62.7-81.5%) and 81.9% (95% CI, 73.9-87.8%), respectively, in patients with CD, and the secondary analysis of the ulcerative colitis subgroup showed a pooled sensitivity and specificity of 72.8 and 59.7%, respectively. Our systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrated that LRG could be useful in detecting IBD activity. It is superior for detecting disease activity, especially in patients with normal CRP levels. The LRG was more accurate in monitoring disease activity in patients with CD than in patients with IBD.

Precision Medicine in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Spotlight on Emerging Molecular Biomarkers

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) remain challenging in terms of understanding their causes and in terms of diagnosing, treating, and monitoring patients. Modern diagnosis combines biomarkers, imaging, and endoscopic methods. Common biomarkers like CRP and fecal calprotectin, while invaluable tools, have limitations and are not entirely specific to IBD. The limitations of existing markers and the invasiveness of endoscopic procedures highlight the need to discover and implement new markers. With an ideal biomarker, we could predict the risk of disease development, as well as the possibility of response to a particular therapy, which would be significant in elucidating the pathogenesis of the disease. Recent research in the fields of machine learning, proteomics, epigenetics, and gut microbiota provides further insight into the pathogenesis of the disease and is also revealing new biomarkers. New markers, such as BAFF, PGE-MUM, oncostatin M, microRNA panels, αvβ6 antibody, and S100A12 from stool, are increasingly being identified, with αvβ6 antibody and oncostatin M being potentially close to being presented into clinical practice. However, the specificity of certain markers still remains problematic. Furthermore, the use of expensive and less accessible technology for detecting new markers, such as microRNAs, represents a limitation for widespread use in clinical practice. Nevertheless, the need for non-invasive, comprehensive markers is becoming increasingly important regarding the complexity of treatment and overall management of IBD.

Serum Leucine-Rich α2 Glycoprotein Could Be a Useful Biomarker to Differentiate Patients with Normal Colonic Mucosa from Those with Inflammatory Bowel Disease or Other Forms of Colitis

(1) Background: Serum leucine-rich α2 glycoprotein (LRG) has been reported as a useful biomarker for monitoring disease activity in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). We investigated whether serum LRG can differentiate patients with normal colonic mucosa from those with IBD or other forms of colitis. (2) Methods: Patients with diarrhea, abdominal pain, or bloody stools were consecutively enrolled at their initial visit to our hospital. Serum LRG and C-reactive protein were measured, and a colonoscopy and histology were performed. (3) Results: We enrolled 317 patients (181 men, 136 women; median age: 51 years). Based on the endoscopic and histological criteria, 260 patients were diagnosed with ulcerative colitis (n = 134), Crohn's disease (n = 10), infectious colitis (n = 43), diverticular colitis (n = 17), or nonspecific colitis (n = 56). The remaining 57 patients were diagnosed with normal colonic mucosa including histology. The latter group's median LRG value (9.5 µg/mL, range: 5.8-13.5) was significantly lower than that of the other 260 patients (13.6 µg/mL, range: 6.8-62.7, p < 0.0001). The optimal LRG cut-off value of <10.4 µg/mL was derived from the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, showing a 91% sensitivity and 77% specificity for identifying patients with normal colonic mucosa. (4) Conclusions: serum LRG values < 10.4 µg/mL could be a useful biomarker for predicting patients with normal colonic mucosa.

Significance of Serum Leucine-rich Alpha-2 Glycoprotein as a Diagnostic Marker in Pediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Serum leucine-rich alpha-2 glycoprotein (LRG) has been utilized for adult inflammatory bowel disease (IBD); however, its efficacy in pediatric IBD remains unknown. The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of serum LRG for pediatric IBD with that of current inflammatory markers, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP). This retrospective case-control study included pediatric patients, aged <16 years, who underwent colonoscopy and/or esophagogastroduodenoscopy between April 2017 and March 2022. All eligible patients were divided into two groups: patients with IBD, diagnosed with ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease, and non-IBD controls. The optimal cut-off value of serum LRG for IBD diagnosis was determined from receiver operating characteristic analysis, and diagnostic accuracy of serum LRG was compared to serum ESR and CRP. A total of 53 patients (24 with IBD and 29 non-IBD controls) met the inclusion criteria. The cut-off value of serum LRG for IBD diagnosis was determined to be 19.5 μg/ml. At this cut-off value, serum LRG had a positive predictive value (PPV) of 0.80 and negative predictive value (NPV) of 0.88. In contrast, PPV and NPV were 0.78 and 0.70 for serum ESR and 0.82 and 0.72 for serum CRP, respectively. Serum LRG can be a potential diagnostic marker for pediatric IBD, with higher diagnostic accuracy than that of the conventional serum markers ESR and CRP.