1
|
Maktabdar M, Houmann RH, Scheel NH, Skytthe KB, Wemmenhove E, Gkogka E, Dalgaard P. Evaluation and validation of extensive growth and growth boundary models for mesophilic and psychrotolerant Bacillus cereus in dairy products (Part 2). Front Microbiol 2025; 16:1553903. [PMID: 40231235 PMCID: PMC11994723 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1553903] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2024] [Accepted: 03/13/2025] [Indexed: 04/16/2025] Open
Abstract
Performance was evaluated for two extensive models to predict growth and growth boundaries of mesophilic and psychrotolerant Bacillus cereus in dairy products. Both models incorporated the inhibitory effect of 11 environmental factors and of their interactions. The two models were calibrated and evaluated using data from 66 and 67 new challenge tests, respectively, conducted with various types of well-characterized dairy products. Additionally, the mesophilic model was evaluated using 139 growth responses from literature (growth/no-growth, lag time, and μmax values) for 24 different B. cereus strains. The psychrotolerant model was evaluated using 109 growth responses from published studies and including data for 26 strains in dairy products. The predictive performance of the evaluated models was compared with four existing models for mesophilic B. cereus and four different models for psychrotolerant B. cereus. The new mesophilic model had good performance and predicted growth responses in new challenge tests, with bias-/accuracy-factor values of 1.13/1.49 and 80% correct, 17% fail-safe, and 3% fail-dangerous growth/no-growth predictions. With literature data for mesophilic B. cereus, predictions were good with bias-/accuracy-factor values of 0.97/1.36 and 91% correct, 9% fail-safe, and 0% fail-dangerous predictions. The evaluated psychrotolerant model also exhibited good performance in predicting growth responses for new challenge tests, with bias-/accuracy-factor values of 1.07/1.38 and 84% correct, 14% fail-safe, and 2% fail-dangerous predictions for growth/no-growth responses. With literature data for psychrotolerant B. cereus, this model did not acceptably predict growth rates at temperatures <10°C. Therefore, the temperature term of the model was expanded at temperatures from 1°C to 10°C. The performance of the updated psychrotolerant model was markedly improved, achieving bias-/accuracy-factor of 1.07/1.80, and 91% correct, 9% fail-safe, and 0% fail-dangerous predictions. The two new and extensive models offer significant advantages over existing models by including the growth inhibiting effects of more environmental factors and their interactions, resulting in un-biased predictions for a wider range of dairy matrices. These validated models can support management of mesophilic and psychrotolerant B. cereus growth in diverse dairy products, contribute to risk assessments and to optimization of combinations of relevant growth-inhibitory factors during product formulation and innovation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maryam Maktabdar
- Food Microbiology and Hygiene, DTU National Food Institute (DTU Food), Technical University of Denmark, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark
| | - Rannvá Høgnadóttir Houmann
- Food Microbiology and Hygiene, DTU National Food Institute (DTU Food), Technical University of Denmark, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark
| | - Nanna Hulbæk Scheel
- Food Microbiology and Hygiene, DTU National Food Institute (DTU Food), Technical University of Denmark, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark
| | - Karoline Broskov Skytthe
- Food Microbiology and Hygiene, DTU National Food Institute (DTU Food), Technical University of Denmark, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark
| | - Ellen Wemmenhove
- Arla Foods Ingredients Innovation Center, Arla Foods Ingredients, Videbæk, Denmark
| | | | - Paw Dalgaard
- Food Microbiology and Hygiene, DTU National Food Institute (DTU Food), Technical University of Denmark, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Fernandes J, Gomes S, Reboredo FH, Pintado ME, Amaral O, Dias J, Alvarenga N. Clean Label Approaches in Cheese Production: Where Are We? Foods 2025; 14:805. [PMID: 40077507 PMCID: PMC11899541 DOI: 10.3390/foods14050805] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2025] [Revised: 02/16/2025] [Accepted: 02/25/2025] [Indexed: 03/14/2025] Open
Abstract
The Clean Label concept has gained significant traction in the cheese industry due to consumer preferences for minimally processed cheeses free from synthetic additives. This review explores different approaches for applying Clean Label principles to the cheese industry while maintaining food safety, sensory quality, and shelf life. Non-thermal technologies, such as high-pressure processing (HPP), pulsed electric fields (PEF), ultra-violet (UV), and visible light (VL), are among the most promising methods that effectively control microbial growth while preserving the nutritional and functional properties of cheese. Protective cultures, postbiotics, and bacteriophages represent microbiological strategies that are natural alternatives to conventional preservatives. Another efficient approach involves plant extracts, which contribute to microbial control, and enhance cheese functionality and potential health benefits. Edible coatings, either alone or combined with other methods, also show promising applications. Despite these advantages, several challenges persist: higher costs of production and technical limitations, possible shorter shelf-life, and regulatory challenges, such as the absence of standardized Clean Label definitions and compliance complexities. Further research is needed to develop and refine Clean Label formulations, especially regarding bioactive peptides, sustainable packaging, and advanced microbial control techniques. Addressing these challenges will be essential for expanding Clean Label cheese availability while ensuring product quality and maintaining consumer acceptance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jaime Fernandes
- UTI—Unidade de Tecnologia e Inovação, Instituto Nacional de Investigação Agrária e Veterinária IP, Quinta do Marquês, 2780-157 Oeiras, Portugal
- NOVA School of Science and Technology, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal
| | - Sandra Gomes
- UTI—Unidade de Tecnologia e Inovação, Instituto Nacional de Investigação Agrária e Veterinária IP, Quinta do Marquês, 2780-157 Oeiras, Portugal
- NOVA School of Science and Technology, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal
| | - Fernando H. Reboredo
- NOVA School of Science and Technology, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal
- GeoBioTec Research Center, NOVA School of Science and Technology, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal
| | - Manuela E. Pintado
- CBQF—Centro de Biotecnologia e Química Fina, Laboratório Associado, Escola Superior de Biotecnologia, Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Rua Diogo Botelho 1327, 4169-005 Porto, Portugal
| | - Olga Amaral
- GeoBioTec Research Center, NOVA School of Science and Technology, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal
- School of Agriculture, Polytechnic University of Beja, Rua Pedro Soares, 7800-295 Beja, Portugal
- MED—Mediterranean Institute for Agriculture, Environment and Development, University of Évora, 7006-554 Évora, Portugal
| | - João Dias
- GeoBioTec Research Center, NOVA School of Science and Technology, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal
- School of Agriculture, Polytechnic University of Beja, Rua Pedro Soares, 7800-295 Beja, Portugal
- MED—Mediterranean Institute for Agriculture, Environment and Development, University of Évora, 7006-554 Évora, Portugal
| | - Nuno Alvarenga
- UTI—Unidade de Tecnologia e Inovação, Instituto Nacional de Investigação Agrária e Veterinária IP, Quinta do Marquês, 2780-157 Oeiras, Portugal
- GeoBioTec Research Center, NOVA School of Science and Technology, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wang W, Jia R, Hui Y, Zhang F, Zhang L, Liu Y, Song Y, Wang B. Utilization of two plant polysaccharides to improve fresh goat milk cheese: Texture, rheological properties, and microstructure characterization. J Dairy Sci 2023; 106:3900-3917. [PMID: 37080791 DOI: 10.3168/jds.2022-22195] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2022] [Accepted: 12/22/2022] [Indexed: 04/22/2023]
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the effects of added jujube polysaccharide (JP) and Lycium barbarum polysaccharide (LBP) on the texture, rheological properties, and microstructure of goat milk cheese. Seven groups of fresh goat milk cheese were produced with 4 levels (0, 0.2, 0.6, and 1%, wt/wt) of JP and LBP. The goat milk cheese containing 1% JP showed the highest water-holding capacity, hardness, and the strongest rheological properties by creating a denser and more stable casein network structure. In addition, the yield of goat milk cheese was substantially improved as a result of JP incorporation. Cheeses containing LBP expressed lower fat content, higher moisture, and softer texture compared with the control cheese. Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy and low-field nuclear magnetic resonance analysis demonstrated that the addition of JP improved the stability of the secondary protein structure in cheese and significantly enhanced the binding capacity of the casein matrix to water molecules due to strengthened intermolecular interactions. The current research demonstrated the potential feasibility of modifying the texture of goat milk cheese by JP or LBP, available for developing tunable goat milk cheese to satisfy consumer preferences and production needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Weizhe Wang
- College of Food Engineering and Nutritional Science, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710119, China
| | - Rong Jia
- College of Food Engineering and Nutritional Science, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710119, China
| | - Yuanyuan Hui
- College of Food Engineering and Nutritional Science, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710119, China
| | - Fuxin Zhang
- College of Food Engineering and Nutritional Science, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710119, China
| | - Lei Zhang
- College of Animal Science and Technology, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China
| | - Yufang Liu
- College of Food Engineering and Nutritional Science, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710119, China
| | - Yuxuan Song
- College of Animal Science and Technology, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China.
| | - Bini Wang
- College of Food Engineering and Nutritional Science, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710119, China.
| |
Collapse
|