Predictors of In-Hospital Mortality in Aboriginal Children Admitted to a Tertiary Paediatric Hospital

Assessing Inequities in Hospital Outcomes for Australian Children From Underserved Populations

OBJECTIVES

Inequity in health outcomes for children and young people (CYP) from underserved populations (Indigenous, culturally and linguistically diverse, refugee and/or asylum seeking, out-of-home care backgrounds, and National Disability Insurance Scheme participants) persists. We quantify baseline inequities in health outcomes to measure the effectiveness of equity interventions.

METHODS

We analyzed electronic medical records on CYP from the Sydney Children's Hospitals Network between 2015 and 2019. The primary outcome measures were high-acuity presentations, potentially preventable hospitalizations (PPH), chronic condition hospitalizations, discharge against medical advice (DAMA), ward and critical care admission, readmission, and extended length of stay (LOS). We used generalized estimating equation models to examine the relationship between underserved population status and outcomes.

RESULTS

One third of 253 934 inpatient and 446 924 emergency department (ED) encounters were underserved CYP. Compared with nonunderserved populations, there was increased risk of PPH (relative risk [RR], 1.25; 95% CI, 1.23-1.27), chronic conditions (RR, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.07-1.10), DAMA (RR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.19-1.49), ward admission (RR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.15-1.18), readmission (RR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.42-1.53), extended inpatient LOS (RR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.18-1.24), and ED LOS (RR, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.10-1.12). As an example of cumulative risk, Indigenous CYP living with a disability had a 239% higher risk of readmission than CYP without these risk factors (RR, 3.39; 95% CI, 2.92-3.93).

CONCLUSIONS

Interventions are required to reduce health inequities for underserved CYP. We present strategies that include improved patient identification, enhanced service access, and system-wide culture change within an equity learning health system.

Providing Enhanced Access to Child Health Services (PEACH) at Sydney Children's Hospital Network: a study protocol

INTRODUCTION

Children and young people (CYP) from priority populations in Australia have inequities in accessing healthcare, health outcomes and opportunities to lead healthy lives. Priority populations include CYP who are Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander, culturally and linguistically diverse (born in a country where English is not an official language and/or speak a language other than English at home), with experience of being a refugee or asylum seeker, living in out-of-home care or with a disability. Providing Enhanced Access to Child Health Services (PEACH) is an organisation-wide quality improvement project that aims to achieve equivalent health outcomes in CYP from priority populations compared with their non-priority population peers.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

PEACH creates an equity-focused learning health system using electronic medical record (eMR) patient data and qualitative methodology exploring staff and service user experiences. Five priority population advisory groups, consisting of staff and priority population service users, guide the research at the Sydney Children's Hospitals Network (SCHN), Australia's largest tertiary paediatric health service. Interviews, surveys and co-design workshops with service users (CYP and/or their parent/carer) and staff describe existing health inequities and inform the design and implementation of interventions to improve identification, provision of earlier and supported access to services and effect cultural change. The impact of PEACH on reducing inequity in care and outcomes will be measured by comparing data during and after implementation (2020-2027) with baseline data before implementation (2015-2019) and with national controls, controlling for potential confounding factors. Health access and outcome measures, including emergency and preventable hospitalisations, critical care admission, discharge against medical advice, readmission and extended length of stay, will be analysed and drawn into dashboards, driving continuous learning and improvement.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The SCHN Human Research Ethics Committee (2022/ETH00145) and Aboriginal Health and Medical Research Council (1920/22) have granted ethics approval. Research findings will be shared with service users, staff advisory groups and the wider children's healthcare sector through presentations, conferences and peer-reviewed journals.

Emergency department assessment and management of children with gastroenteritis

BACKGROUND

Acute gastroenteritis is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in children. The aim of this study was to explore assessment and management of children aged between 6 and 48 months presenting to the emergency department (ED) with acute gastroenteritis.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included 340 children aged 6-48 months. Data were collected by medical record audit for children presenting between 1 January and 31 December 2019.

RESULTS

General assessments were appropriate, specific dehydration assessment, blood pressure measurement and fluid balance chart documentation could be improved. Management of children with severe or no/mild dehydration was largely compliant with current recommendations: there was variability in management of children with moderate dehydration. There were no significant differences between Australian Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal children in terms of dehydration severity and pathology abnormalities, however there were differences in management strategies.

CONCLUSIONS

ED management of children with gastroenteritis was largely consistent with, or superior to, evidence-based recommendations. There was variability in the management of children with moderate dehydration and Australian Aboriginal children but it is unclear whether this is suboptimal or patient specific care. This study has highlighted areas for further research in this unique context.

Hospital admissions in children with developmental disabilities from ethnic minority backgrounds

AIM

To compare hospital admission patterns after the first year of life in Australian children with developmental disabilities and children with no known disability, according to maternal country of birth and Indigenous status.

METHOD

This was a retrospective cohort study using linked data across health, disability, and hospital admission databases. The study investigated 656 174 children born in Western Australia between 1983 and 2008 with a total of 1 091 834 records of hospital admissions.

RESULTS

Children with no known disability born to Indigenous mothers had the highest rate of hospital admissions compared to children of non-Indigenous mothers. Children of foreign-born mothers from low-income countries had the highest rate of hospital admissions if disability was present. Children with cerebral palsy (CP) with or without associated intellectual disability had the highest rate of hospital admissions among children with developmental disability, especially if mothers were foreign-born.

INTERPRETATION

Children with CP and intellectual disability, particularly from minority backgrounds (Indigenous Australian and foreign-born mothers), were at higher risk of being admitted to hospital after the first year of life.

WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS

Hospital admissions in Australian children with and without disabilities differ according to maternal country of birth. Hospital admission rates in children without a developmental disability were greatest for Australian-born Indigenous children. Disabled Australian-born children of foreign-born mothers from low-income countries had the highest hospital admission rates. Hospital admission risk was greatest for Australian-born children with cerebral palsy, especially if mothers were foreign-born.