Voices of Community Partners: Perspectives Gained from Conversations of Community-Based Participatory Research Experiences

Community health needs assessment: findings from a community-university partnership strengthening program on maternal and child health in Pakistan

BACKGROUND

Pakistan has been progressing at a slow pace in enhancing maternal and child health (MCH) indicators, experiencing some of the poorest pregnancy outcomes globally. In response to the challenges faced at the community level in MCH, a community health needs assessment (CHNA) was undertaken through a community-university partnership project. The aim of this CHNA was to understand the MCH needs and associated social determinants within the specific local context of the community.

METHODS

The assessment of community MCH needs was performed in two phases in Lahore, Pakistan. Initially, the semi-urban area of Shah Di Khoi, within the university's catchment area, was chosen based on an extensive review of both primary and secondary data. In the second phase, a CHNA was conducted among females of reproductive age (15-49 years) having at least one child under 5 years. Data encompassing socio-demographic characteristics, anthropometric measures, and the health needs of mothers and children were collected using a structured questionnaire. The data were analyzed employing SPSS version 21, utilizing descriptive statistics and Pearson chi-square, and binary logistic regression at a 95% confidence interval.

RESULTS

In this study, 253 reproductive-age females and 371 children under 5 were examined. Critical community issues included unmet family planning needs (29.6%), maternal anemia (18.6%), and child malnutrition (28.6%). Concerns encompassed suboptimal drinking water practices (62.0%), child non-vaccination (19.1%), widespread ghutti use (84.9%), suboptimal birth spacing (25.7%), non-exclusive breastfeeding for the first six months (88.7%), and prelacteal feeding (66.8%). Analysis identified maternal anemia (AOR = 0.38; p = 0.010), nuclear family adoption (AOR = 2.049; p = 0.033), unhealthy water practices (AOR = 0.48; p = 0.023), and ghutti provision at birth (AOR = 0.37; p = 0.030) as pivotal predictors of child nutritional status.

CONCLUSION

In order to improve the overall health status of community, it is imperative to implement collective strategies tailored to the specific factors and challenges prevalent in the community. The results underscore the importance of maintaining the community-university partnership through establishing a dedicated Maternal and Child Health Center. These findings contribute to the growing body of knowledge in MCH research and inform evidence-based policies for enhanced health outcomes in similar contexts.

Partnering with Families and Communities to Improve Child Health and Health Equity

Pediatricians and other pediatric health providers collaborate with families and communities, including schools, health departments, and other partners to advance pediatric health challenges and health equity. This article will discuss best practices and guiding principles to support engagement and effective partnership with families and communities. Models for engaging families and communities while promoting health equity will also be discussed. Case studies and examples will be shared, as well as how they may be applied by pediatric health providers to promote child health.

The Creation of a Program of Engagement and Outreach for COVID-19 Among African Americans Through Community-Academic Partnerships

The COVID-19 pandemic has disproportionately affected racial and ethnic minority groups in the U.S. Over a 7-week period in late 2020, with funding from the NC Office of Minority Health and Health Disparities, the West Greenville Health Council (WGHC), a community-academic, non-profit partnership, engaged and activated a 27-member organizational partnership network for COVID-19 health communication and personal protective equipment (PPE) distribution in African American communities in Eastern North Carolina. Outreach included: local production and dissemination of 10 culturally relevant safety videos, 10 risk, prevention, and safety postcard messages, 3 virtual forums, and PPE kit distribution via the network and their distribution venues. Communication mediums included social media posts (i.e., Facebook and YouTube), network email distribution lists, and postcards distributed along with PPE kits. Outreach activities were evaluated via an online survey, reach of social media posts, and PPE distribution. Working through the organizational network, the WGHC reached a combined total of 30,310 community members with educational materials. Forty-four outreach events were held during this period and over 8000 PPE kits were distributed. The online survey, distributed through the network, yielded more than 400 completed questionnaires. This tool was used to gain insights on community perceptions of COVID-19 safety barriers and media messages. The activation of the network as an approach for rapid response to an emerging public health crisis greatly expanded the reach of the WGHC. The WGHC is working to institutionalize the network to address future emerging health threats, as well as the dissemination of health information more generally.

Development of a Binational Framework for Active and Healthy Ageing (AHA) Bridging Austria and Slovenia in a Thermal Spa Region

In view of ongoing demographic developments resulting in a longer life expectancy of the European population, the creation of “age-friendly” environments represents an initiative picked up by the European Union and its Member States to enable active and healthy ageing. The present study aims at the co-creation of a cross-border framework model to deploy a healthy ageing region linking Austria and Slovenia, building on previous work dealing with the development of an integrated regional ecosystem for active and healthy ageing. A qualitative, community-based action research method based on focus group discussions allowed the development of an exemplary framework model for active and healthy ageing building on cross-border collaboration in the region of Promura. Within the project group, twelve cross-border regional key assets were identified. In the course of further open discussions, an exemplary model for the deployment of a cross-border healthy ageing region was developed, comprising underlying fundamental environmental aspects, regional structures in the field of health and care as well as crosscutting features spreading across all levels. This article presents a promising, strategic co-creation approach on how to span a model on active and healthy ageing across two cross-border regions with similar characteristics and assets.

Evaluating Research Centers in Minority Institutions: Framework, Metrics, Best Practices, and Challenges

The NIH-funded Research Centers in Minority Institutions (RCMI) program is currently funding 18 academic institutions to strengthen the research environment and contribution to health disparities research. The purpose of this multiphase mixed-methods study was to establish a uniform evaluation framework for demonstrating the collective success of this research consortium. Methods included discussions of aims and logic models at the RCMI Evaluators' Workshop, a literature review to inform an evaluation conceptual framework, and a case study survey to obtain evaluation-related information and metrics. Ten RCMIs participated in the workshop and 14 submitted responses to the survey. The resultant RCMI Evaluation Conceptual Model presents a practical ongoing approach to document RCMIs' impacts on health disparities. Survey results identified 37 common metrics under four primary categories. Evaluation challenges were issues related to limited human resources, data collection, decision-making, defining metrics, cost-sharing, and revenue-generation. There is a need for further collaborative efforts across RCMI sites to engage program leadership and community stakeholders in addressing the identified evaluation challenges and measurement. Program leadership should be engaged to apply the Evaluation Conceptual Framework and common metrics to allow for valid inter-institutional comparisons and consortium-wide evaluations. Stakeholders could ensure evaluation metrics are used to facilitate community impacts.