1
|
Skinner A, Occhipinti JA, Song YJC, Hickie IB. Mental health impacts of COVID-19: A retrospective analysis of dynamic modelling projections for Australia. Heliyon 2024; 10:e28250. [PMID: 38586382 PMCID: PMC10998102 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e28250] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2023] [Revised: 03/02/2024] [Accepted: 03/14/2024] [Indexed: 04/09/2024] Open
Abstract
Background In early 2020, we developed a dynamic model to support policy responses aimed at mitigating the adverse mental health effects of the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia. As the pandemic has progressed, it has become clear that our initial model forecasts overestimated the impacts of infection control measures (lockdowns, physical distancing, etc.) on suicide, intentional self-harm hospitalisation, and mental health-related emergency department (ED) presentation rates. Methods Potential explanations for the divergence of our model predictions from observed outcomes were assessed by comparing simulation results for a set of progressively more refined models with data on the prevalence of moderate to very high psychological distress and numbers of suicides, intentional self-harm hospitalisations, and mental health-related ED presentations published after our modelling was released in July 2020. Results Allowing per capita rates of spontaneous recovery and intentional self-harm to differ between people experiencing moderate to very high psychological distress prior to the pandemic and those developing comparable levels of psychological distress only as a consequence of infection control measures substantially improves the fit of our model to empirical estimates of the prevalence of psychological distress and leads to significantly lower predicted effects of COVID-19 on suicide, intentional self-harm hospitalisation, and mental health-related ED presentation rates. Conclusion Accommodating the influence of prior mental health on the psychological effects of population-wide social and economic disruption is likely to be critical for accurately forecasting the mental health impacts of future public health crises as they inevitably arise.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam Skinner
- Brain and Mind Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Jo-An Occhipinti
- Brain and Mind Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Computer Simulation and Advanced Research Technologies (CSART), Sydney, Australia
| | - Yun Ju Christine Song
- Brain and Mind Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Ian B. Hickie
- Brain and Mind Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Crosland P, Ho N, Hosseini SH, Vacher C, Skinner A, Natsky AN, Rosenberg S, Hasudungan R, Huntley S, Song YJC, Lee GY, Marshall DA, Occhipinti JA, Hickie IB. Cost-effectiveness of system-level mental health strategies for young people in the Australian Capital Territory: a dynamic simulation modelling study. Lancet Psychiatry 2024; 11:123-133. [PMID: 38245017 DOI: 10.1016/s2215-0366(23)00396-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2023] [Revised: 11/15/2023] [Accepted: 11/15/2023] [Indexed: 01/22/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Regional mental health planning is a key challenge for decision makers because mental health care is a complex, dynamic system. Economic evaluation using a system dynamics modelling approach presents an opportunity for more sophisticated planning and important evidence on the value of alternative investments. We aimed to investigate the cost-effectiveness of eight systems-based interventions targeted at improving the mental health and wellbeing of children, adolescents, and young adults in the Australian Capital Territory (ACT). METHODS We assessed eight interventions for children and young people (aged ≤25 years) with low, moderate, and high-to-very-high psychological distress: technology-enabled integrated care, emergency department-based suicide prevention, crisis response service, family education programme, online parenting programme, school-based suicide prevention programme, trauma service for youths, and multicultural-informed care. We developed a system dynamics model for the ACT through a participatory process and calibrated the model with historical data, including population demographics, the prevalence of psychological distress, and mental health services provision. We calculated incremental cost-effectiveness ratios compared with business as usual for cost (AU$) per: quality-adjusted life-year (QALY), suicide death avoided, self-harm related hospital admissions avoided, and mental health-related emergency department presentation, using a 10-year time horizon for health-care and societal perspectives. We investigated uncertainty through probabilistic sensitivity analysis and deterministic sensitivity analysis, including using a 30-year timeframe. FINDINGS From a societal perspective, increased investment in technology-enabled integrated care, family education, an online parenting programme, and multicultural-informed care were expected to improve health outcomes (incremental QALYs 4517 [95% UI -3135 to 14 507] for technology-enabled integrated care; 339 [91 to 661] for family education; 724 [114 to 1149] for the online parenting programme; and 137 [88 to 194] for multicultural-informed care) and reduce costs ($-91·4 million [-382·7 to 100·7]; $-12·8 million [-21·0 to -6·6]; $-3·6 million [-6·3 to 0·2]; and $-3·1 million [-4·5 to -1·8], respectively) compared with business as usual using a 10-year time horizon. The incremental net monetary benefit for the societal perspective for these four interventions was $452 million (-351 to 1555), $40 million (14 to 74), $61 million (9 to 98), and $14 million (9 to 20), respectively, compared with business as usual, when QALYs were monetised using a willingness to pay of $79 930 per QALY. Synergistic effects are anticipated if these interventions were to be implemented concurrently. The univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analyses indicated a high level of certainty in the results. Although emergency department-based suicide prevention and school-based suicide prevention were not cost effective in the base case (41 QALYs [0 to 48], incremental cost $4·1 million [1·2 to 8·2] for emergency department-based suicide prevention; -234 QALYs [-764 to 12], incremental cost $90·3 million [72·2 to 111·0] for school-based suicide prevention) compared with business as usual, there were scenarios for which these interventions could be considered cost effective. A dedicated trauma service for young people (9 QALYs gained [4 to 16], incremental cost $8·3 million [6·8 to 10·0]) and a crisis response service (-11 QALYs gained [-12 to -10], incremental cost $7·8 million [5·1 to 11·0]) were unlikely to be cost effective in terms of QALYs. INTERPRETATION Synergistic effects were identified, supporting the combined implementation of technology-enabled integrated care, family education, an online parenting programme, and multicultural-informed care. Synergistic effects, emergent outcomes in the form of unintended consequences, the capability to account for service capacity constraints, and ease of use by stakeholders are unique attributes of a system dynamics modelling approach to economic evaluation. FUNDING BHP Foundation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Crosland
- Youth Mental Health and Technology, Brain and Mind Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Translational Research Collective, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| | - Nicholas Ho
- Youth Mental Health and Technology, Brain and Mind Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Translational Research Collective, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Seyed Hossein Hosseini
- Youth Mental Health and Technology, Brain and Mind Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Translational Research Collective, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Catherine Vacher
- Youth Mental Health and Technology, Brain and Mind Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Translational Research Collective, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Adam Skinner
- Youth Mental Health and Technology, Brain and Mind Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Translational Research Collective, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Andrea N Natsky
- Youth Mental Health and Technology, Brain and Mind Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Translational Research Collective, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Sebastian Rosenberg
- Youth Mental Health and Technology, Brain and Mind Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Translational Research Collective, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Raphael Hasudungan
- Youth Mental Health and Technology, Brain and Mind Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Translational Research Collective, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Sam Huntley
- Youth Mental Health and Technology, Brain and Mind Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Translational Research Collective, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Yun Ju Christine Song
- Youth Mental Health and Technology, Brain and Mind Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Translational Research Collective, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Grace Yeeun Lee
- Youth Mental Health and Technology, Brain and Mind Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Translational Research Collective, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Deborah A Marshall
- Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary and Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Jo-An Occhipinti
- Youth Mental Health and Technology, Brain and Mind Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Translational Research Collective, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Ian B Hickie
- Youth Mental Health and Technology, Brain and Mind Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Translational Research Collective, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Crosland P, Angeles MR, Noyes J, Willman A, Palermo M, Klarenaar P, Howse E, Ananthapavan J. The economic costs of alcohol-related harms at the local level in New South Wales. Drug Alcohol Rev 2024; 43:440-453. [PMID: 38173218 DOI: 10.1111/dar.13794] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2023] [Revised: 09/25/2023] [Accepted: 11/09/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Alcohol is a harmful, toxic and addictive substance that causes many diseases and injuries. Alcohol use also incurs a financial cost to the health care system and wider economy. This project aimed to undertake a cost impact analysis of alcohol-related harms at the local level in New South Wales (NSW). The alcohol-related harms costing model is an interactive tool designed for use by local health districts, stakeholders such as Liquor and Gaming NSW, NSW Independent Liquor and Gaming Authority and community stakeholders. METHODS Costs included in the analysis were alcohol-related hospitalisations, deaths, crimes, emergency department attendances, outpatient presentations and their impacts on productivity. Two local government areas (LGA) were used as case studies to demonstrate local impacts. RESULTS In 2019-2020, the total cost of alcohol-related harms for NSW was estimated at $9 billion, at a rate of $120.3 million per 100,000 population. The total costs were comprised of alcohol-attributable premature mortality ($8.3 billion), non-fatal health care costs ($275 million) and crime costs ($457 million). A comparative analysis of two case study LGAs estimated that alcohol-related harms cost $195 million for the Northern Beaches LGA and $351 million for the Central Coast LGA. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS This research has developed a 'proof-of-concept' model to estimate the cost of alcohol-related harms at the local level in Australia, empowering health agencies and local community stakeholders to use economic evidence in their submissions in response to new liquor licence applications and other policies that impact their local community. This economic evidence can be used to improve the quality of decisions on alcohol regulation and policies. There are a number of future research opportunities that would enhance the economic evidence available to liquor licensing decision-makers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Crosland
- Systems Modelling, Simulation & Data Science, Youth Mental Health and Technology, Brain and Mind Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Mary Rose Angeles
- Deakin Health Economics, Institute for Health Transformation, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
| | - Jonathon Noyes
- Northern Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, Australia
| | - Arlita Willman
- Northern Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, Australia
| | | | - Paul Klarenaar
- Northern Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, Australia
| | - Eloise Howse
- The Australian Prevention Partnership Centre, Sax Institute, Sydney, Australia
| | - Jaithri Ananthapavan
- Deakin Health Economics, Institute for Health Transformation, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Schuerkamp R, Liang L, Rice KL, Giabbanelli PJ. Simulation Models for Suicide Prevention: A Survey of the State-of-the-Art. COMPUTERS (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2023; 12:10.3390/computers12070132. [PMID: 37869477 PMCID: PMC10588059 DOI: 10.3390/computers12070132] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2023]
Abstract
Suicide is a leading cause of death and a global public health problem, representing more than one in every 100 deaths in 2019. Modeling and Simulation (M&S) is widely used to address public health problems, and numerous simulation models have investigated the complex, dependent, and dynamic risk factors contributing to suicide. However, no review has been dedicated to these models, which prevents modelers from effectively learning from each other and raises the risk of redundant efforts. To guide the development of future models, in this paper we perform the first scoping review of simulation models for suicide prevention. Examining ten articles, we focus on three practical questions. First, which interventions are supported by previous models? We found that four groups of models collectively support 53 interventions. We examined these interventions through the lens of global recommendations for suicide prevention, highlighting future areas for model development. Second, what are the obstacles preventing model application? We noted the absence of cost effectiveness in all models reviewed, meaning that certain simulated interventions may be infeasible. Moreover, we found that most models do not account for different effects of suicide prevention interventions across demographic groups. Third, how much confidence can we place in the models? We evaluated models according to four best practices for simulation, leading to nuanced findings that, despite their current limitations, the current simulation models are powerful tools for understanding the complexity of suicide and evaluating suicide prevention interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan Schuerkamp
- Department of Computer Science & Software Engineering, Miami University, Oxford, OH 45056, USA
| | - Luke Liang
- Department of Computer Science & Software Engineering, Miami University, Oxford, OH 45056, USA
| | - Ketra L. Rice
- National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, GA 30341, USA
| | - Philippe J. Giabbanelli
- Department of Computer Science & Software Engineering, Miami University, Oxford, OH 45056, USA
| |
Collapse
|