Synergies of Targeting Tumor Angiogenesis and Immune Checkpoints in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer and Renal Cell Cancer: From Basic Concepts to Clinical Reality

SAFFRON-103: a phase Ib study of sitravatinib plus tislelizumab in anti-PD-(L)1 refractory/resistant advanced melanoma

Aim: Investigate TKI sitravatinib plus anti-PD-1 antibody tislelizumab in patients with unresectable/advanced/metastatic melanoma with disease progression on/after prior first-line anti-PD-(L)1 monotherapy. Methods: Open-label, multicenter, multicohort study (NCT03666143). Patients in the melanoma cohort (N = 25) received sitravatinib once daily plus tislelizumab every 3 weeks. The primary end point was safety and tolerability. Results: Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred in all patients, with ≥grade 3 TEAEs in 52.0%. Most TEAEs were mild-or-moderate in severity, none were fatal, and few patients discontinued treatment owing to TEAEs (12.0%). Objective response rate was 36.0% (95% CI: 18.0-57.5). Median progression-free survival was 6.7 months (95% CI: 4.1-not estimable). Conclusion: Sitravatinib plus tislelizumab had manageable safety/tolerability in patients with anti-PD-(L)1 refractory/resistant unresectable/advanced/metastatic melanoma, with promising antitumor activity. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT03666143 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

A novel prognostic predictor of immune microenvironment and therapeutic response in clear cell renal cell carcinoma based on angiogenesis-immune-related gene signature

Background

Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC), the most common type of RCC, typically produces no symptoms initially. Patients with ccRCC are at increased risk of developing advanced metastatic disease due to the absence of dependable and effective prognostic biomarkers. Therefore, it is particularly urgent to find optimal stratification of patients with ccRCC to distinguish the clinical benefits of different malignant degrees. Angiogenesis has a profound impact on the malignant behavior of renal cancer cells, and anti-angiogenic drugs have been applied to metastatic renal cancer patients. Moreover, immune function dysregulation is also a significant factor in tumorigenesis. We aim to construct a predictive model that combines angiogenesis and immune-related genes (AIRGs) to aid clinicians in predicting ccRCC prognosis.

Methods

We gathered transcriptome and clinicopathology data from two datasets, the E-MTAB-1980 dataset and the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). We utilized consensus clustering to find new molecular subgroups. A predictive model for the prognosis of angiogenesis-immune-associated genes (AIRGs) was conducted by the lasso and multivariate Cox regression analysis. The signature's predictive ability was then tested in different datasets. Meticulous scrutiny and comprehensive assessment were undertaken, both internally and externally, to establish the prognostic model. Analyses of immunogenomics were carried out to examine the relationship between risk scores and clinical/immune features, including immune cell infiltration, genomic alterations, and response to targeted and immunotherapy therapy.

Results

Our prognostic signature, comprising 4 AIRGs, stood as an independent prognostic factor for ccRCC, while risk scores emerged as a novel indicator for forecasting overall survival. Risk scores exhibited significant associations with various immunophenotypic factors, such as oncogenic pathways, antitumor response, different immune cell infiltration, antitumor immunity, and response to targeted and immunotherapy therapy.

Conclusions

AIRGs-based prognostic prediction model could effectively predict immunotherapy responses and survival outcomes of ccRCC.

A retrospective real-world study: the efficacy of immune-related combination therapies in advanced non-small cell lung cancer after resistance to EGFR-TKIs

BACKGROUND

Whether patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) should choose an immune-combination therapy regimen after EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) resistance is currently unclear.

METHODS

We evaluated 118 NSCLC patients treated by immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) + chemotherapy (I + C), ICIs + chemotherapy + antiangiogenic therapy (I + C + A), chemotherapy + antiangiogenic therapy (C + A) after inefficacy of EGFR-TKIs. We assessed the objective remission rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and progression-free survival (PFS) of these treatments.

RESULTS

The ORR was 26.1% vs 38.2% vs 16.3% in the three groups (P = 0.093). The divergence in DCR was also statistically significant (65.2% vs 85.3% vs 74.4%, P = 0.209). The median PFS was no statistically significant difference in PFS (3.09 vs 6.31 vs 5.91 months, P = 0.809), but the Kaplan-Meier survival curve of 12-month-PFS indicated an apparent survival advantage in the I + C + A group (P = 0.001). In addition, the I + C/I + C + A group showed higher median PFS than the C + A group in patients with brain metastases (median PFS, 6.44 vs 4.21 months, P = 0.022). The divergence in ORR of patients in the brain group was also statistically significant (P = 0.045). The I + C + A group showed superior efficacy in patients with liver metastases (median PFS, 0.95 vs 6.44 vs 3.48 months, P < 0.0001). The Cox proportional hazard modeling analysis suggested that the age, brain metastases, and liver metastases were all connected with the prognosis.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that advanced NSCLC patients after resistance to EGFR-TKIs may achieve better outcomes from triple therapy. Patients with brain metastases favor ICIs-related combination therapies and patients with liver metastases prefer I + C + A therapy.

Research advances in mechanism of antiangiogenic therapy combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors for treatment of non-small cell lung cancer

Immunotherapy has changed the treatment strategy of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in recent years, among which anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies are the most used. However, the majority of patients with NSCLC do not derive benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Vascular abnormalities are a hallmark of most solid tumors and facilitate immune evasion. Thus, combining antiangiogenic therapies might increase the effectiveness of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies. In this paper, the mechanisms of anti-angiogenic agents combined with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies are illustrated, moreover, relevant clinical studies and predictive immunotherapeutic biomarkers are summarized and analyzed, in order to provide more treatment options for NSCLC patients.

Potential therapeutic target secretogranin II might cooperate with hypoxia-inducible factor 1α in sunitinib-resistant renal cell carcinoma

Multitargeted receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors, including vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors, such as sunitinib, have been used as the primary targeted agents for patients with recurrent or distant metastasis of advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). However, endogenous or acquired sunitinib resistance has become a significant therapeutic problem. Therefore, we focused on mechanisms of sunitinib resistance in RCC. First, we undertook RNA sequencing analysis using previously established sunitinib-resistant RCC (SUR-Caki1, SUR-ACHN, and SUR-A498) cells. The results showed increased expression of secretogranin II (SCG2, chromogranin C) in SUR-RCC cells compared to parental cells. The Cancer Genome Atlas database showed that SCG2 expression was increased in RCC compared to normal renal cells. In addition, the survival rate of the SCG2 high-expression group was significantly lower than that of the RCC low-expression group. Thus, we investigated the involvement of SCG2 in sunitinib-resistant RCC. In vitro analysis showed that migratory and invasive abilities were suppressed by SCG2 knockdown SUR cells. As SCG2 was previously reported to be associated with angiogenesis, we undertook a tube formation assay. The results showed that suppression of SCG2 inhibited angiogenesis. Furthermore, coimmunoprecipitation assays revealed a direct interaction between SCG2 and hypoxia-inducible factor 1α (HIF1α). Expression levels of VEGF-A and VEGF-C downstream of HIF1α were found to be decreased in SCG2 knockdown SUR cells. In conclusion, SCG2 could be associated with sunitinib resistance through VEGF regulation in RCC cells. These findings could lead to a better understanding of the VHL/HIF/VEGF pathway and the development of new therapeutic strategies for sunitinib-resistant RCC.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors promising role in cancer therapy: clinical evidence and immune-related adverse events

The advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has led to noteworthy progressions in the management of diverse cancer types, as evidenced by the pioneering "ipilimumab" medication authorized by US FDA in 2011. Importantly, ICIs agents have demonstrated encouraging potential in bringing about transformation across diverse forms of cancer by selectively targeting the immune checkpoint pathways that are exploited by cancerous cells for dodging the immune system, culminating in progressive and favorable health outcomes for patients. The primary mechanism of action (MOA) of ICIs involves blocking inhibitory immune checkpoints. There are three approved categories including Programmed Death (PD-1) inhibitors (cemiplimab, nivolumab, and pembrolizumab), Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) (Ipilimumab), and Programmed Death-Ligand 1 (PDL-1) (Avelumab). Although ICIs promisingly increase therapeutic response and cancer survival rates, using ICIs has demonstrated some limitations including autoimmune reactions and toxicities, requiring close monitoring. The present review endeavors to explicate the underlying principles of the MOA and pharmacokinetics of the approved ICIs in the realm of cancer induction, including an appraisal of their level of practice-based evidence.

SAFFRON-103: a phase 1b study of the safety and efficacy of sitravatinib combined with tislelizumab in patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Some patients with locally advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) respond poorly to anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/anti-programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) treatments. Combination with other agents may improve the outcomes. This open-label, multicenter, phase 1b trial investigated the combination of sitravatinib, a spectrum-selective tyrosine kinase inhibitor, plus anti-PD-1 antibody tislelizumab.

METHODS

Patients with locally advanced/metastatic NSCLC were enrolled (Cohorts A, B, F, H, and I; N=22-24 per cohort). Cohorts A and F included patients previously treated with systemic therapy, with anti-PD-(L)1-resistant/refractory non-squamous (cohort A) or squamous (cohort F) disease. Cohort B included patients previously treated with systemic therapy, with anti-PD-(L)1-naïve non-squamous disease. Cohorts H and I included patients without prior systemic therapy for metastatic disease, no prior anti-PD-(L)1/immunotherapy, with PD-L1-positive non-squamous (cohort H) or squamous (cohort I) histology. Patients received sitravatinib 120 mg orally one time per day plus tislelizumab 200 mg intravenously every 3 weeks, until study withdrawal, disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or death. The primary endpoint was safety/tolerability among all treated patients (N=122). Secondary endpoints included investigator-assessed tumor responses and progression-free survival (PFS).

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 10.9 months (range: 0.4-30.6). Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 98.4% of the patients, with ≥Grade 3 TRAEs in 51.6%. TRAEs led to discontinuation of either drug in 23.0% of the patients. Overall response rate was 8.7% (n/N: 2/23; 95% CI: 1.1% to 28.0%), 18.2% (4/22; 95% CI: 5.2% to 40.3%), 23.8% (5/21; 95% CI: 8.2% to 47.2%), 57.1% (12/21; 95% CI: 34.0% to 78.2%), and 30.4% (7/23; 95% CI: 13.2% to 52.9%) in cohorts A, F, B, H, and I, respectively. Median duration of response was not reached in cohort A and ranged from 6.9 to 17.9 months across other cohorts. Disease control was achieved in 78.3-90.9% of the patients. Median PFS ranged from 4.2 (cohort A) to 11.1 months (cohort H).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with locally advanced/metastatic NSCLC, sitravatinib plus tislelizumab was tolerable for most patients, with no new safety signals and overall safety profiles consistent with known profiles of these agents. Objective responses were observed in all cohorts, including in patients naïve to systemic and anti-PD-(L)1 treatments, or with anti-PD-(L)1 resistant/refractory disease. Results support further investigation in selected NSCLC populations.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT03666143.

A New Treatment Landscape for RCC: Association of the Human Microbiome with Improved Outcomes in RCC

Microbes play different roles in metabolism, local or systemic inflammation, and immunity, and the human microbiome in tumor microenvironment (TME) is important for modulating the response to immunotherapy in cancer patients. Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is an immunogenic tumor, and immunotherapy is the backbone of its treatment. Correlations between the microbiome and responsiveness to immune checkpoint inhibitors have been reported. This review summarizes the recent therapeutic strategies for RCC and the effects of TME on the systemic therapy of RCC. The current understanding and advances in microbiome research and the relationship between the microbiome and the response to immunotherapy for RCC are also discussed. Improving our understanding of the role of the microbiome in RCC treatment will facilitate the development of microbiome targeting therapies to modify the tumor microbiome and improve treatment outcomes.

Manipulation of the crosstalk between tumor angiogenesis and immunosuppression in the tumor microenvironment: Insight into the combination therapy of anti-angiogenesis and immune checkpoint blockade

Immunotherapy has been recognized as an effective and important therapeutic modality for multiple types of cancer. Nevertheless, it has been increasing recognized that clinical benefits of immunotherapy are less than expected as evidenced by the fact that only a small population of cancer patients respond favorably to immunotherapy. The structurally and functionally abnormal tumor vasculature is a hallmark of most solid tumors and contributes to an immunosuppressive microenvironment, which poses a major challenge to immunotherapy. In turn, multiple immune cell subsets have profound consequences on promoting neovascularization. Vascular normalization, a promising anti-angiogenic strategy, can enhance vascular perfusion and promote the infiltration of immune effector cells into tumors via correcting aberrant tumor blood vessels, resulting in the potentiation of immunotherapy. More interestingly, immunotherapies are prone to boost the efficacy of various anti-angiogenic therapies and/or promote the morphological and functional alterations in tumor vasculature. Therefore, immune reprograming and vascular normalization appear to be reciprocally regulated. In this review, we mainly summarize how tumor vasculature propels an immunosuppressive phenotype and how innate and adaptive immune cells modulate angiogenesis during tumor progression. We further highlight recent advances of anti-angiogenic immunotherapies in preclinical and clinical settings to solidify the concept that targeting both tumor blood vessels and immune suppressive cells provides an efficacious approach for the treatment of cancer.

Regorafenib for the Treatment of Sarcoma

OPINION STATEMENT

Sarcomas are a rare group of tumors with many subtypes, conventionally classified into soft-tissue sarcomas and bone sarcomas. Chemotherapeutic regimens form the mainstay of systemic therapy but are not well defined beyond the first-line setting and clinical outcomes are variable. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), with a broad inhibition profile which have been shown to target tumor angiogenesis, have an established role in the treatment of sarcomas without characteristic driver alterations. One such TKI, regorafenib, has been evaluated in sarcomas and clinical data are discussed in this review. An overview of regorafenib data from five phase 2 and one phase 1b clinical trials in over 10 sarcoma subtypes (both soft-tissue and bone) in adult and pediatric patients is reviewed. Regorafenib demonstrated clinical benefit in patients with non-adipocytic soft-tissue sarcomas, osteosarcoma and Ewing sarcoma who had progressed on prior therapy. Patients with otherwise limited treatment options may therefore benefit from regorafenib therapy.

: A case report of re-challenge of immune checkpoint inhibitors after immune-related neurological adverse events: Review of literature

INTRODUCTION

The indications for immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are expanding for various cancers because of their durable responses and tolerable safety profiles. Immune-related adverse events (irAEs), including neurological adverse events (nAEs), are associated with ICIs therapy. However, there have been few studies on whether re-challenge with ICIs can be clinically acceptable after neurological AE has improved.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 69-year-old woman with recurrent ovarian cancer undergoing palliative chemotherapy was admitted to our hospital with sudden development of diplopia, dizziness, and gait instability. The patient was administered ICI therapy with anti-angiogenic agents for 9 weeks for 3 cycles.

DIAGNOSIS

We performed neurological examination, brain imaging, nerve conduction studies, and serology tests. The patient was diagnosed with Guillain-Barré syndrome variant, an immune-mediated polyneuropathy characterized by a triad of ataxia, areflexia, and ophthalmoplegia.

INTERVENTION

After prompt discontinuation of pembrolizumab, the patient was taken intravenous methylprednisolone (2 mg/kg) was administered for 5 days, and her symptoms were partially resolved. With the addition of immunoglobulin 0.4 g/kg for 5 days, her symptoms gradually improved.

OUTCOMES

The patient's neurological symptoms improved after immunosuppressive therapy, without sequelae. The NCV showed normal nerve conduction. Unfortunately, because there was little evidence for pembrolizumab rechallenge, pembrolizumab therapy was permanently discontinued, and the tumors eventually progressed.

Comprehensive characterization of the prostate tumor microenvironment identifies CXCR4/CXCL12 crosstalk as a novel antiangiogenic therapeutic target in prostate cancer

Background

Crosstalk between neoplastic and stromal cells fosters prostate cancer (PCa) progression and dissemination. Insight in cell-to-cell communication networks provides new therapeutic avenues to mold processes that contribute to PCa tumor microenvironment (TME) alterations. Here we performed a detailed characterization of PCa tumor endothelial cells (TEC) to delineate intercellular crosstalk between TEC and the PCa TME.

Methods

TEC isolated from 67 fresh radical prostatectomy (RP) specimens underwent multi-omic ex vivo characterization as well as orthogonal validation of both TEC functions and key markers by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and immunofluorescence (IF). To identify cell–cell interaction targets in TEC, we performed single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) in four PCa patients who underwent a RP to catalogue cellular TME composition. Targets were cross-validated using IHC, publicly available datasets, cell culture expriments as well as a PCa xenograft mouse model.

Results

Compared to adjacent normal endothelial cells (NEC) bulk RNA-seq analysis revealed upregulation of genes associated with tumor vasculature, collagen modification and extracellular matrix remodeling in TEC. PTGIR, PLAC9, CXCL12 and VDR were identified as TEC markers and confirmed by IF and IHC in an independent patient cohort. By scRNA-seq we identified 27 cell (sub)types, including endothelial cells (EC) with arterial, venous and immature signatures, as well as angiogenic tip EC. A focused molecular analysis revealed that arterial TEC displayed highest CXCL12 mRNA expression levels when compared to all other TME cell (sub)populations and showed a negative prognostic role. Receptor-ligand interaction analysis predicted interactions between arterial TEC derived CXCL12 and its cognate receptor CXCR4 on angiogenic tip EC. CXCL12 was in vitro and in vivo validated as actionable TEC target by highlighting the vessel number- and density- reducing activity of the CXCR4-inhibitor AMD3100 in murine PCa as well as by inhibition of TEC proliferation and migration in vitro.

Conclusions

Overall, our comprehensive analysis identified novel PCa TEC targets and highlights CXCR4/CXCL12 interaction as a potential novel target to interfere with tumor angiogenesis in PCa.

Graphical Abstract

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12943-022-01597-7.

Case Report: Toripalimab Combined With Anlotinib in a Patient With Metastatic Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma After Pembrolizumab Failure

Urothelial carcinoma is the most common primary upper tract urinary carcinoma. If surgery, chemotherapy, and immunotherapy fail, the prognosis for upper tract urinary carcinoma is extremely poor. Immunotherapy combined with antiangiogenesis therapy is a new therapeutic regimen with a synergistic antitumor effect. We present a case of metastatic upper tract urinary carcinoma in which the patient underwent surgery and treatment with gemcitabine combined with platinum-based chemotherapy. Radiotherapy and second-line immunotherapy (pembrolizumab) were administered after the cancer had progressed to the left lymph node of the abdominal aorta in the umbilical plane. However, the patient developed liver metastases while being treated with pembrolizumab. He was administered off-label immunotherapy (toripalimab) combined with antiangiogenesis therapy (anlotinib) and achieved a long-term clinical response for over 25 months. Toripalimab combined with anlotinib has potential therapeutic value for locally advanced or metastatic upper tract urinary carcinoma in patients who had previously received platinum-based chemotherapy and had disease progression or after treatment with a PD-1 inhibitor.

Antiangiogenic antibody BD0801 combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors achieves synergistic antitumor activity and affects the tumor microenvironment

Background

Signaling through VEGF/VEGFR induces cancer angiogenesis and affects immune cells. An increasing number of studies have recently focused on combining anti-VEGF/VEGFR agents and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) to treat cancer in preclinical and clinical settings. BD0801 is a humanized rabbit anti-VEGF monoclonal antibody in the clinical development stage.

Methods

In this study, the anti-cancer activities of BD0801 and its potential synergistic anti-tumor effects when combined with different immunotherapies were assessed by using in vitro assays and in vivo tumor models. Ex vivo studies were conducted to reveal the possible mechanisms of actions (MOA) underlying the tumor microenvironment modification.

Results

BD0801 showed more potent antitumor activity than bevacizumab, reflected by stronger blockade of VEGF/VEGFR binding and enhanced inhibitory effects on human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs). BD0801 exhibited dose-dependent tumor growth inhibitory activities in xenograft and murine syngeneic tumor models. Notably, combining BD0801 with either anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1 antibodies showed synergistic antitumor efficacy in both lung and colorectal cancer mouse models. Furthermore, the mechanistic studies suggested that the MOA of the antitumor synergy involves improved tumor vasculature normalization and enhanced T-cell mediated immunity, including increased tumor infiltration of CD8⁺ and CD4⁺ T cells and reduced double-positive CD8⁺PD-1⁺ T cells.

Conclusions

These data provide a solid rationale for combining antiangiogenic agents with immunotherapy for cancer treatment and support further clinical development of BD0801 in combination with ICIs.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-021-08859-5.

Antitumor immune effects of preoperative sitravatinib and nivolumab in oral cavity cancer: SNOW window-of-opportunity study

BACKGROUND

Sitravatinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor that targets TYRO3, AXL, MERTK and the VEGF receptor family, is predicted to increase the M1 to M2-polarized tumor-associated macrophages ratio in the tumor microenvironment and have synergistic antitumor activity in combination with anti-programmed death-1/ligand-1 agents. SNOW is a window-of-opportunity study designed to evaluate the immune and molecular effects of preoperative sitravatinib and nivolumab in patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma.

METHODS

Patients with newly-diagnosed untreated T2-4a, N0-2 or T1 >1 cm-N2 oral cavity carcinomas were eligible. All patients received sitravatinib 120 mg daily from day 1 up to 48 hours pre-surgery and one dose of nivolumab 240 mg on day 15. Surgery was planned between day 23 and 30. Standard of care adjuvant radiotherapy was given based on clinical stage. Tumor photographs, fresh tumor biopsies and blood samples were collected at baseline, at day 15 after sitravatinib alone, and at surgery after sitravatinib-nivolumab combination. Tumor flow cytometry, multiplex immunofluorescence staining and single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNAseq) were performed on tumor biopsies to study changes in immune-cell populations. Tumor whole-exome sequencing and circulating tumor DNA and cell-free DNA were evaluated at each time point.

RESULTS

Ten patients were included. Grade 3 toxicity occurred in one patient (hypertension); one patient required sitravatinib dose reduction, and one patient required discontinuation and surgery delay due to G2 thrombocytopenia. Nine patients had clinical-to-pathological downstaging, with one complete response. Independent pathological treatment response (PTR) assessment confirmed a complete PTR and two major PTRs. With a median follow-up of 21 months, all patients are alive with no recurrence. Circulating tumor DNA and cell-free DNA dynamics correlated with clinical and pathological response and distinguished two patient groups with different tumor biological behavior after sitravatinib alone (1A) versus sitravatinib-nivolumab (1B). Tumor immunophenotyping and scRNAseq analyses revealed differential changes in the expression of immune cell populations and sitravatinib-targeted and hypoxia-related genes in group 1A vs 1B patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The SNOW study shows sitravatinib plus nivolumab is safe and leads to deep clinical and pathological responses in oral cavity carcinomas. Multi-omic biomarker analyses dissect the differential molecular effects of sitravatinib versus the sitravatinib-nivolumab and revealed patients with distinct tumor biology behavior.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT03575598.

Controlled ovarian stimulation therapy as a potential risk for the development and progression of renal cell carcinomas: A case report and literature review

Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC) is the most common type of cancer in the kidney and is mostly asymptomatic. Previous studies have supported the important role of sex hormones in RCC pathophysiology and that targeted hormone receptor therapy, such as estrogen receptor targeting, is a promising treatment strategy. However, to the best of our knowledge, it remains unknown whether hormonal therapy, such as controlled ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization, serves a role in the development and progression of RCC. The present report describes a case of RCC developed after a fertility stimulation therapy and provides a summary of the known literature on the role of hormone receptors in the development and progression of RCC. A 35-year-old woman received fertility stimulation treatment with follitropin alfa 900 units, human chorionic gonadotropic hormone 5,000 units, injectable leuprolide 1 mg/0.2 ml and cetrotide 0.25 mg. The patient presented to the hospital with shortness of breath and weight loss. The patient had no known genetic predisposition or family history of malignancies and no exposure to chemicals. The patient never used tobacco, alcohol or recreational drugs. Imaging revealed a 17x19 mm, heterogeneously enhancing, and partially exophytic mass in the right kidney. After partial nephrectomy, the pathological evaluation confirmed the diagnosis of clear cell RCC. To the best of our knowledge, this was the first time that a case of ovarian stimulation therapy was associated with the development of RCC. This case raises concerns about the potential oncogenic effect of controlled ovarian stimulation therapy in RCC promotion, suggesting a need for systematic research to clarify the clinical significance of existing pre-clinical data.

[Research Progress of Anti-angiogenic Agents Combined with Immunotherapy in Patients with Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer]

Lung cancer has the highest incidence rate and mortality in China, even in the world, and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for about 85%. The growth and metastasis of tumor depend on the generation of blood vessels, and anti-angiogenic therapy is playing an increasingly important role, however, no significant improvement was observed in the underwent anti-angiogenic agents used for patients alone. In recent years, the application of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) has significantly improved the prognosis of some lung cancer patients, however, the objective response rate of patients receiving ICI alone is low. While anti-angiogenic agents and ICI both regulate the tumor immune microenvironment and have a potential synergistic mechanism, showing a bright prospect in the combined application of anti-tumor therapy. In this review, we focused on the research and application of anti-angiogenic agents in combination with ICI in advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Angiogenesis inhibition in non-small cell lung cancer: a critical appraisal, basic concepts and updates from American Society for Clinical Oncology 2019

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Recently, the combination of antiangiogenic agents, chemotherapy and immunotherapy has shown synergistic anticancer effects in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The future for this approach appears bright in lung cancer treatment; however, many challenges remain to be overcome regarding its true potential, optimal sequence and timing of therapy, and safety profile. In this review, we will discuss the current status and future direction of antiangiogenic therapy for the treatment of NSCLC, and highlight emerging strategies, such as tumor vessel normalization (TVN).

RECENT FINDINGS

Bevacizumab was the first antiangiogenic agent approved for the treatment of advanced NSCLC. Recently, the combination of chemotherapy/antiangiogenic therapy with immunotherapy showed high efficacy in first-line settings. A subgroup of patients with liver metastasis and driver mutation-addicted tumors benefited most, suggesting that the metastatic location, as well as the genetic background of the tumor, are key determinants for therapy responses.

SUMMARY

The efficacy of antiangiogenic therapies in unselected patients is rather limited. The tumor microenvironment has appeared to be more complex and heterogeneous than previously assumed. Only a contextual rather than a cell-specific approach might provide valuable insights towards the clinical validation of combinational therapies.

The Fire Within: NF-κB Involvement in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Thirty-four years since its discovery, NF-κB remains a transcription factor with great potential for cancer therapy. However, NF-κB-targeted therapies have yet to find a way to be clinically translatable. Here, we focus exclusively on the role of NF-κB in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and discuss its contributing effect on cancer hallmarks such as inflammation, proliferation, survival, apoptosis, angiogenesis, epithelial-mesenchymal transition, metastasis, stemness, metabolism, and therapy resistance. In addition, we present our current knowledge of the clinical significance of NF-κB and its involvement in the treatment of patients with NSCLC with chemotherapy, targeted therapies, and immunotherapy.

Combining Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors with Anti-Angiogenic Agents

Immunotherapy has recently emerged as a novel strategy for treating different types of solid tumors, with promising results. However, still a large fraction of patients do not primarily respond to such approaches, and even responders sooner or later develop resistance. Moreover, immunotherapy is a promising strategy for certain malignancies but not for others, with this discrepancy having been attributed to a more immunogenic microenvironment of some tumors. As abnormal and augmented tumor vessels often occur in cancerogenesis, anti-angiogenic drugs have already demonstrated their effectiveness both in preclinical and in clinical settings. By targeting abnormal formation of tumor vessels, anti-angiogenetic agents potentially result in an enhanced infiltration of immune effector cells. Moreover, crosstalks downstream of the immune checkpoint axis and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) signaling may result in synergistic effects of combined treatment in tumor cells. In this review, we will describe and discuss the biological rationale of a combined therapy, underlying the modification in tumor microenvironment as well as in tumor cells after exposure to checkpoint inhibitors and anti-angiogenic drugs. Moreover, we will highlight this strategy as a possible way for overcoming drug resistance. By first discussing potential prognostic and predictive factors for combined treatment, we will then turn to clinical settings, focusing on clinical trials where this strategy is currently being investigated.

[Basis of Tumor Microenvironment Relevant to Immunotherapies for Brain Metastases of NSCLC]

脑是非小细胞肺癌(non-small cell lung cancer, NSCLC)最常见的远处转移部位，脑转移也是晚期肺癌致残致死的主要原因。近年来，小分子酪氨酸激酶抑制剂的应用和疗效奠定了驱动基因突变阳性的NSCLC脑转移的治疗基础。随着程序性死亡受体1(programmed cell death protein 1, PD-1)/程序性死亡受体配体1(programmed cell death protein ligand 1, PD-L1)抑制剂及相应联合疗法的不断发展，免疫治疗已成为驱动基因突变泛阴性的NSCLC脑转移患者的重要选择，相关生物标志物的价值也日益凸显。由于NSCLC脑转移肿瘤及其微环境的免疫病理特征具有一定的特殊性，本文旨在回顾相关研究进展，并为免疫治疗联合策略的探索与新型免疫疗法的开发提供参考。

Anti-PD-1 Therapy plus Chemotherapy and/or Bevacizumab as Second Line or later Treatment for Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Immune checkpoint inhibitor combination therapy exhibited outstanding efficacy in first line setting for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) patients. However, whether PD-1 inhibitor combined treatment is effective in second line or later setting remains unknown. Therefore, we retrospectively evaluated the efficacy of combined therapy of PD-1 inhibitor with chemotherapy and/or bevacizumab compared to PD-1 inhibitor alone for aNSCLC patients in second line or later setting. Patients with aNSCLC who have received anti-PD-1 based therapy between 2015 and 2017 were screened, and 55 patients were ultimately included and divided into the monotherapy group (N=33) and the combination group (N=22). Patients treated with combination therapy exhibited superior PFS versus those treated with monotherapy (median PFS, 7.5 months vs 3.3 months; hazard ratio 0.28; 95% CI, 0.14-0.56; P<0.001). Objective response rate and disease control rate were 31.8% (7/22) and 95.5% (21/22) in the combination group and 10.0% (3/30) and 46.7% (14/30) in the monotherapy group, respectively (ORR, P=0.075; DCR, P<0.001). Five patients (22.7%) experienced grade 3-4 adverse events in the combination group and two patients (6.1%) in the monotherapy group. Taken together, our results indicated that for NSCLC patients who had failed on the first-line or later treatment, PD-1 inhibitor in combination with chemotherapy and/or bevacizumab might be a favorable treatment option. These findings warrant further validation in prospective studies.

Uveal Melanoma, Angiogenesis and Immunotherapy, Is There Any Hope?

Uveal melanoma is considered a rare disease but it is the most common intraocular malignancy in adults. Local treatments are effective, but the systemic recurrence rate is unacceptably high. Moreover, once metastasis have developed the prognosis is poor, with a 5-year survival rate of less than 5%, and systemic therapies, including immunotherapy, have rendered poor results. The tumour biology is complex, but angiogenesis is a highly important pathway in these tumours. Vasculogenic mimicry, the ability of melanomas to generate vascular channels independently of endothelial cells, could play an important role, but no effective therapy targeting this process has been developed so far. Angiogenesis modulates the tumour microenvironment of melanomas, and a close interplay is established between them. Therefore, combining immune strategies with drugs targeting angiogenesis offers a new therapeutic paradigm. In preclinical studies, these approaches effectively target these tumours, and a phase I clinical study has shown encouraging results in cutaneous melanomas. In this review, we will discuss the importance of angiogenesis in uveal melanoma, with a special focus on vasculogenic mimicry, and describe the interplay between angiogenesis and the tumour microenvironment. In addition, we will suggest future therapeutic approaches based on these observations and mention ways in which to potentially enhance current treatments.

Targeting the Tumor Microenvironment in Renal Cell Cancer Biology and Therapy

Renal cell cancer (RCC) is a highly vascularized and immunogenic tumor type. The inhibition of vessel formation by anti-angiogenic therapies, as well as the stimulation of the immune system by immunotherapy has revolutionized the therapeutic landscape of RCC in recent years. Nevertheless, both therapies are associated with therapy resistance due to a highly dynamic, adaptive and heterogeneous tumor microenvironment (TME). The aim of this short review article is to provide an overview of the components of the RCC TME as well as to discuss their contribution to disease progression. In addition, we report on preclinical and clinical findings and how the different TME components can be modulated to impede treatment progression as well as to overcome therapy resistance to anti-angiogenic or immunomodulating therapy concepts. Furthermore, we discuss the predictive and prognostic role of the TME in RCC therapy. We also report on the concept of combinational targeting of anti-angiogenic therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy, also including the latest results of clinical studies discussed at recent oncological meetings. Finally, promising new therapeutic targets within the TME are mentioned.

Combinatorial Approaches With Checkpoint Inhibitors to Enhance Anti-tumor Immunity

Treatment of cancer patients has been recently revolutionized by the application of various immunotherapeutics. However, the response rates are still limited ranging between approximately 20 and 40% suggesting that combinations of immunotherapy with conventional treatment, like chemotherapy, radiation, epigenetic modulators, targeted therapies using small molecules as well as other (immuno) therapeutics, might be an option to increase systemic anti-tumor immunity. It is postulated that different non-immune based therapies in combination with immunotherapies could reprogram the immune suppressive tumor microenvironment and enhance the immunogenicity of tumor cells leading to an improved therapeutic efficacy and a better patients' outcome. Despite there exist various examples of increased objective responses achieved by adding these different therapies to immunotherapies, strategies for rational and evidence-based design of checkpoint inhibitor combinations to maximize the clinical benefit for patients are urgently required. Therefore, the main purpose of this review is to summarize recent results obtained from experimental models and clinical trials to enhance tumor immunogenicity by combining immunotherapy with other therapeutic options to maximize patients' outcome and minimize adverse events.

The extracellular matrix in tumor progression and metastasis

The extracellular matrix (ECM) constitutes the scaffold of tissues and organs. It is a complex network of extracellular proteins, proteoglycans and glycoproteins, which form supramolecular aggregates, such as fibrils and sheet-like networks. In addition to its biochemical composition, including the covalent intermolecular cross-linkages, the ECM is also characterized by its biophysical parameters, such as topography, molecular density, stiffness/rigidity and tension. Taking these biochemical and biophysical parameters into consideration, the ECM is very versatile and undergoes constant remodeling. This review focusses on this remodeling of the ECM under the influence of a primary solid tumor mass. Within this tumor stroma, not only the cancer cells but also the resident fibroblasts, which differentiate into cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs), modify the ECM. Growth factors and chemokines, which are tethered to and released from the ECM, as well as metabolic changes of the cells within the tumor bulk, add to the tumor-supporting tumor microenvironment. Metastasizing cancer cells from a primary tumor mass infiltrate into the ECM, which variably may facilitate cancer cell migration or act as barrier, which has to be proteolytically breached by the infiltrating tumor cell. The biochemical and biophysical properties therefore determine the rates and routes of metastatic dissemination. Moreover, primed by soluble factors of the primary tumor, the ECM of distant organs may be remodeled in a way to facilitate the engraftment of metastasizing cancer cells. Such premetastatic niches are responsible for the organotropic preference of certain cancer entities to colonize at certain sites in distant organs and to establish a metastasis. Translational application of our knowledge about the cancer-primed ECM is sparse with respect to therapeutic approaches, whereas tumor-induced ECM alterations such as increased tissue stiffness and desmoplasia, as well as breaching the basement membrane are hallmark of malignancy and diagnostically and histologically harnessed.

Systemic Management for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Review of the Molecular Pathways of Carcinogenesis, Current and Emerging Therapies, and Novel Treatment Strategies

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) arises from a number of cirrhosis-related and non-cirrhosis-related exposures and is one of the leading causes of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Achieving a durable cure currently relies on either resection or transplantation, but since most patients will be diagnosed with inoperable disease, there is great interest in achieving more effective systemic therapies. At a molecular level, HCC is heterogeneous, but initial treatment strategies, including the use of multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors and checkpoint inhibitors, have been fairly homogenous, depending on general host factors and overall tumor burden rather than specific molecular signatures. Over the past 2 decades, however, there has been significant success in identifying key molecular targets, including driver mutations involving the telomerase reverse transcriptase, p53, and beta-catenin genes, and significant work is now being devoted to translating these discoveries into the development of robust and well-tolerated targeted therapies. Furthermore, multi-modal therapies have also begun to emerge, harnessing possible synergism amongst a variety of different treatment classes. As the findings of these landmark trials become available over the next several years, the landscape of the systemic management of advanced HCC will change significantly.

Adjuvant Chemotherapy With or Without Biologics Including Antiangiogenics and Monoclonal Antibodies Targeting EGFR and EpCAM in Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Adjuvant therapy for early-stage colorectal cancer improves survival. Biologic agents have shown promise as adjuncts to chemotherapy in metastatic colon cancer, but the effect on earlier stage cancer remains unclear.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the additive effect of biologic agents to adjuvant chemotherapy on survival in colorectal cancer (all comers and subpopulations defined by microsatellite instability, BRAF and KRAS status, and stage). Only randomized controlled trials published between 2002 and 2017 in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL were included. The control arm: chemotherapy alone, the intervention arm: chemotherapy with biologic agents.

OUTCOMES

overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival.

RESULTS

Six trials including 10,754 patients were included. OS (hazard ratio [HR] 2.55, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.15-3.03) and disease-free survival (HR 2.54, 95% CI 2.25-2.87) were significantly worse in the intervention arm. High heterogeneity was explained by subgroup analysis of different biologic agents (bevacizumab versus others); however, results still showed harm in the intervention arm across subgroups. Bevacizumab was associated with improved OS in patients with microsatellite instability (HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.36-0.92); this was the only indication of benefit for a biomarker-defined subpopulation. Analyses by tumor stage failed to demonstrate advantage with use of a biologic agent; however, it explained heterogeneity.

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of biologic agents to adjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of high-risk stage II and III colorectal cancer is associated with worse survival outcomes. The only subgroup of patients that may benefit from the addition of bevacizumab to adjuvant chemotherapy is those with microsatellite unstable tumors.

Optimized Expression and Characterization of a Novel Fully Human Bispecific Single-Chain Diabody Targeting Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor165 and Programmed Death-1 in Pichia pastoris and Evaluation of Antitumor Activity In Vivo

Bispecific antibodies, which can bind to two different epitopes on the same or different antigens simultaneously, have recently emerged as attractive candidates for study in various diseases. Our present study successfully constructs and expresses a fully human, bispecific, single-chain diabody (BsDb) that can bind to vascular endothelial growth factor 165 (VEGF165) and programmed death-1 (PD-1) in Pichia pastoris. Under the optimal expression conditions (methanol concentration, 1%; pH, 4.0; inoculum density, OD600 = 4, and the induction time, 96 h), the maximum production level of this BsDb is achieved at approximately 20 mg/L. The recombinant BsDb is purified in one step using nickel-nitrilotriacetic acid (Ni-NTA) column chromatography with a purity of more than 95%. Indirect enzyme-linked immune sorbent assay (ELISA) and sandwich ELISA analyses show that purified BsDb can bind specifically to VEGF165 and PD-1 simultaneously with affinities of 124.78 nM and 25.07 nM, respectively. Additionally, the BsDb not only effectively inhibits VEGF165-stimulated proliferation, migration, and tube formation in primary human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs), but also significantly improves proliferation and INF-γ production of activated T cells by blocking PD-1/PD-L1 co-stimulation. Furthermore, the BsDb displays potent antitumor activity in mice bearing HT29 xenograft tumors by inhibiting tumor angiogenesis and activating immune responses in the tumor microenvironment. Based on these results, we have prepared a potential bispecific antibody drug that can co-target both VEGF165 and PD-1 for the first time. This work provides a stable foundation for the development of new strategies by the combination of an angiogenesis inhibition and immune checkpoint blockade for cancer therapy.

High IDO-1 expression in tumor endothelial cells is associated with response to immunotherapy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma

Nivolumab belongs to the standard therapy in the second‐line setting of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Although deep and long‐lasting responses are seen in some patients, the majority of patients will further progress. PD‐L1 is still under critical evaluation as a predictive biomarker. Thus, more accurate biomarkers are clearly warranted. Here, we investigated for the first time the predictive role of IDO‐1, a negative immune‐regulatory molecule, on clear cell RCC tissues of 15 patients undergoing nivolumab therapy. IDO‐1 and other immune inhibitory molecules (PD‐L1, PD‐L2, FOXP3) as well as immune cell subsets (CD3, CD4 and CD8) were measured on formalin‐fixed, paraffin‐embedded sections of RCC specimens by immunohistochemistry. IDO‐1 was predominantly expressed in tumor endothelial cells, and was totally absent from tumor cells itself. IDO‐1 overexpression (>10%) could be detected more frequently in responders (100%, n = 6/6) compared to non‐responders (33.3%, n = 3/9; P = .028), resulting in a better progression‐free survival during immunotherapy (IDO‐1 ≤ 10% vs >10%, median: 3.5 vs not estimated (NE) months, P = .01 by log‐rank test). In addition, IDO‐1 was positively correlated with CD8⁺ T cell expression (r_s = .691, P = .006). PD‐L1 expression on tumor cells was negative in 13 (86.7%) of 15 patients, irrespective of therapeutic response (responders vs non‐responders: 83.3% vs 88.9%). No differences were noticed in the PD‐L1 expression on tumor‐infiltrating immune cells (PD‐L1 < 1% in 66.7% of both responders and non‐responders). In contrast to PD‐L1, these results suggest that IDO‐1 may be a more promising predictive biomarker for response to immune‐based cancer therapy in mRCC.

Drug Delivery in Cancer Therapy, Quo Vadis?

The treatment of malignancies has undergone dramatic changes in the past few decades. Advances in drug delivery techniques and nanotechnology have allowed for new formulations of old drugs, so as to improve the pharmacokinetics, to enhance accumulation in solid tumors, and to reduce the significant toxic effects of these important therapeutic agents. Here, we review the published clinical data in cancer therapy of several major drug delivery systems, including targeted radionuclide therapy, antibody-drug conjugates, liposomes, polymer-drug conjugates, polymer implants, micelles, and nanoparticles. The clinical outcomes of these delivery systems from various phases of clinical trials are summarized. The success and limitations of the drug delivery strategies are discussed based on the clinical observations. In addition, the challenges in applying drug delivery for efficacious cancer therapy, including physical barriers, tumor heterogeneity, drug resistance, and metastasis, are discussed along with future perspectives of drug delivery in cancer therapy. In doing so, we intend to underscore that efficient delivery of cancer therapeutics to solid malignancies remains a major challenge in cancer therapy, and requires a multidisciplinary approach that integrates knowledge from the diverse fields of chemistry, biology, engineering, and medicine. The overall objective of this review is to improve our understanding of the clinical fate of commonly investigated drug delivery strategies, and to identify the limitations that must be addressed in future drug delivery strategies, toward the pursuit of curative therapies for cancer.