Gonadotropin Releasing Hormone Agonists Have an Anti-apoptotic Effect on Cumulus Cells

Ovarian tissue cryopreservation for fertility preservation: a two-decade single-center experience with 451 children and adolescents

BACKGROUND

Ovarian tissue cryopreservation (OTC) is the only fertility preservation option for premenarcheal girls before gonadotoxic treatment, but is still considered to be experimental in pediatric patients. This study investigated storage behaviors across different age groups to refine counseling approaches for pediatric patients.

METHODS

This retrospective study analyzed data from children (0-14 years), adolescents (15-19 years), and adults (≥ 20 years) who underwent OTC between 2000-2021 at the University Hospital Bonn's cryobank. Comparison to adults (age ≥ 20 years) was conducted.

RESULTS

Of 2,475 patients, 6% were children and 12% adolescents. Sarcoma was most common in children, lymphoma in adolescents. Adults had longer active storage than children (5.5 vs. 4.7 years, p = 0.011), but for active storage ≥ 10 years, children and adolescents stored longer than adults (13.1 and 12.6 vs. 11.8 years, p ≤ 0.01). The proportion of adolescents increased, while that of children decreased in long-term storage. Median ovarian cortex surface before cryopreservation was 3.5 cm2 in children and 4.5 cm2 in adolescents. Leukemia and sarcoma had the highest mortality rates in children (25% and 13.5%). Overall, pregnancy and birth rates following ovarian tissue transplantation (OTT) were 34.5% and 24.1%, respectively. Among adolescents, pregnancy rates were 33.3% after OTT and 27.3% without OTT, while all children without OTT achieved pregnancy (100%).

CONCLUSIONS

Children and adolescents represent a small subset of OTC patients, with indications linked to common pediatric malignancies. For active storage ≥ 10 years, they store longer than adults, likely due to delayed reproduction or awaiting in vitro growth / in vitro maturation in hematological cases. Overall, adults store longer, but adolescent storage has risen over time possibly due to higher child mortality and previously limited OTC use in younger patients. Mean ovarian cortex surface data may guide pediatric tissue harvest recommendations, with unilateral oophorectomy advised. Fertility preservation counseling and cost coverage should be standard for pediatric patients undergoing gonadotoxic treatment. A tailored approach to OTC indications is essential, especially in high-mortality cancers like leukemia or sarcoma. Favorable pregnancy rates observed, even without OTT, suggest possible OTC overutilization, highlighting the need for individualized strategies and careful clinical decision-making to balance risks and preserve reproductive potential.

Current practices in oncofertility counseling: updated evidence on fertility preservation and post-treatment pregnancies in young women affected by early breast cancer

INTRODUCTION

Anticancer treatments have significantly contributed to increasing cure rates of breast cancer in the last years; however, they can also lead to short- and long-term side effects, including gonadotoxicity, and compromised fertility in young women. Oncofertility is a crucial issue for young patients who have not yet completed their family planning at the time of cancer diagnosis.

AREAS COVERED

This review aims to cover all the latest available evidence in the field of oncofertility, including the gonadotoxicity of currently adopted anticancer therapies in the curative breast cancer setting, the available strategies for fertility preservation and the feasibility of achieving a pregnancy following anticancer treatment completion.

EXPERT OPINION

Over the past years, a significant progress has been made in oncofertility care for young women with breast cancer. In the context of the currently available evidence, every young woman with newly diagnosed breast cancer should receive a proper and complete oncofertility counseling before starting any anticancer treatment to increase her chances of future pregnancies.

Gonadotropin Activity during Early Folliculogenesis and Implications for Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome and Premature Ovarian Insufficiency: A Narrative Review

Female fertility depends on the ovarian reserve of follicles, which is determined at birth. Primordial follicle development and oocyte maturation are regulated by multiple factors and pathways and classified into gonadotropin-independent and gonadotropin-dependent phases, according to the response to gonadotropins. Folliculogenesis has always been considered to be gonadotropin-dependent only from the antral stage, but evidence from the literature highlights the role of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and luteinizing hormone (LH) during early folliculogenesis with a potential role in the progression of the pool of primordial follicles. Hormonal and molecular pathway alterations during the very earliest stages of folliculogenesis may be the root cause of anovulation in polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) and in PCOS-like phenotypes related to antiepileptic treatment. Excessive induction of primordial follicle activation can also lead to premature ovarian insufficiency (POI), a condition characterized by menopause in women before 40 years of age. Future treatments aiming to suppress initial recruitment or prevent the growth of resting follicles could help in prolonging female fertility, especially in women with PCOS or POI. This review will briefly introduce the impact of gonadotropins on early folliculogenesis. We will discuss the influence of LH on ovarian reserve and its potential role in PCOS and POI infertility.

Long-acting gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist trigger in fertility preservation cycles before chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Oocytes/embryo cryopreservation and ovarian function suppression with gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists (GnRHas) are two established strategies for preserving fertility in patients with cancer, frequently both being offered to the same woman. As the first injection of GnRHa should be administered before chemotherapy, it is usually performed in the luteal phase of the urgent controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) cycle. The GnRHa flare-up effect on recently stimulated ovaries may cause ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) and this risk may discourage some oncologists to offer an ovarian function preservation method with proven efficacy. We suggest the long-acting GnRHa as an option to trigger ovulation for egg retrieval in oncological patients, whenever ovarian suppression during chemotherapy is planned.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed prospectively collected data from all consecutive ovarian stimulation cases in oncological patients for oocyte cryopreservation from 2016 to 2021 in a single academic referral center. The COS was performed according to good clinical practice standards. Since 2020 long-acting GnRHa trigger was offered to all patients for whom ovarian suppression after cryopreservation was planned. All other patients served as controls, stratified for the triggering method used: highly purified chorionic gonadotrophin 10 000 UI or short-acting GnRHa 0.2 mg.

RESULTS

Mature oocytes were collected, with the expected maturation rate, in all the 22 cycles triggered with GnRHa. The mean number of cryopreserved oocytes was 11.1 ± 4, with a maturation rate of 80% (57%-100%), versus 8.8 ± 5.8, 74% (33%-100%) with highly purified chorionic gonadotrophin and 14 ± 8.4, 80% (44%-100%) with short-acting GnRHa. No case of OHSS was observed after long-acting GnRHa triggering and by 5 days after egg retrieval most patients had reached luteinizing hormone levels showing suppression.

CONCLUSIONS

Our preliminary data show that long-acting GnRHa is efficacious in inducing the final oocytes' maturation, reducing OHSS risk and suppressing ovarian function by the start of chemotherapy.

GnRH Analogues as a Co-Treatment to Therapy in Women of Reproductive Age with Cancer and Fertility Preservation

In this review, we analyzed existing literature regarding the use of Gonadotropin-releasing Hormone (GnRH) analogues (agonists, antagonists) as a co-treatment to chemotherapy and radiotherapy. There is a growing interest in their application as a prophylaxis to gonadotoxicity caused by chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy due to their ovarian suppressive effects, making them a potential option to treat infertility caused by such chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy. They could be used in conjunction with other fertility preservation options to synergistically maximize their effects. GnRH analogues may be a valuable prophylactic agent against chemotherapeutic infertility by inhibiting rapid cellular turnover on growing follicles that contain types of cells unintentionally targeted during anti-cancer treatments. These could create a prepubertal-like effect in adult women, limiting the gonadotoxicity to the lower levels that young girls have. The use of GnRH agonists was found to be effective in hematological and breast cancer treatment whereas for ovarian endometrial and cervical cancers the evidence is still limited. Studies on GnRH antagonists, as well as the combination of both agonists and antagonists, were limited. GnRH antagonists have a similar protective effect to that of agonists as they preserve or at least alleviate the follicle degradation during chemo-radiation treatment. Their use may be preferred in cases where treatment is imminent (as their effects are almost immediate) and whenever the GnRH agonist-induced flare-up effect may be contra-indicated. The combination treatment of agonists and antagonists has primarily been studied in animal models so far, especially rats. Factors that may play a role in determining their efficacy as a chemoprotective agent that limits gonadal damage, include the type and stage of cancer, the use of alkylating agents, age of patient and prior ovarian reserve. The data for the use of GnRH antagonist alone or in combination with GnRH agonist is still very limited. Moreover, studies evaluating the impact of this treatment on the ovarian reserve as measured by Anti-Müllerian Hormone (AMH) levels are still sparse. Further studies with strict criteria regarding ovarian reserve and fertility outcomes are needed to confirm or reject their role as a gonadal protecting agent during chemo-radiation treatments.

The effects and mechanism of taxanes on chemotherapy-associated ovarian damage: A review of current evidence

Chemotherapy is often a cause of premature ovarian insufficiency and infertility since the ovarian follicles are extremely sensitive to the effects of chemotherapeutic agents. Different chemotherapeutic agents with varying mechanisms of action may damage ovarian function differently. Taxanes are widely used in clinical cancer treatment, but the specific reproductive toxicological information is still controversial. This review described the impact and duration of taxanes on ovarian function in women and analyzed the possible reasons for different conclusions. Furthermore, the toxicity of taxanes on ovarian function and its possible mechanisms were discussed. The potential protective strategies and agents against ovarian damage induced by taxanes are also reviewed.

GnRHa protects the ovarian reserve by reducing endoplasmic reticulum stress during cyclophosphamide-based chemotherapy

Chemotherapy-induced ovarian dysfunction is a serious adverse effect in premenopausal patients with cancer. Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogs (GnRHa) protect ovarian function, but its molecular mechanisms have not yet been determined. In this study, we attempted to determine the previously unknown molecular mechanism by which such protection occurs. Serum anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels were tested in tumor-bearing nude mice, a series of exploratory experiments were conducted. We discovered that GnRHa protects granulosa cells from chemotherapeutic toxicity in vivo and in vitro. We also showed that CTX-induced endoplasmic reticulum stress inhibits the secretion of AMH, and treatment with GnRHa relieves ER stress and the subsequent unfolded-protein response by modulating mTOR signaling to induce autophagy. The results of mechanistic studies indicated that GnRHa-modulated mTOR signaling to induce autophagy, which alleviated CTX-induced ER stress and promoted the secretion of AMH.

How to Protect Ovarian Function before and during Chemotherapy?

A significant number of women receive a cancer diagnosis before their age of natural menopause. Among these patients, the most frequent neoplasms are breast cancer, gynecological, and hematological malignancies. Premature ovarian insufficiency and infertility are among the most feared short- to long-term consequences of anticancer treatments in premenopausal patients. Both patient- and treatment-related characteristics are key factors in influencing the risk of gonadotoxicity with the use of chemotherapy. The cryopreservation of oocytes/embryos is a standard strategy for fertility preservations offered to young women interested in future family planning, but it does not allow gonadal function protection during chemotherapy. Ovarian suppression with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) during chemotherapy is now recommended as an option to reduce the risk of gonadotoxicity in order to avoid the negative consequences of premature ovarian insufficiency in premenopausal women receiving cytotoxic therapy, including those not interested in fertility preservation. This review summarizes the risk of treatment-induced gonadotoxicity in premenopausal patients and the evidence available on the protective role of administering GnRHa during chemotherapy to preserve ovarian function.

Uptake, excretion and toxicity of titanate nanotubes in three stains of free-living ciliates of the genus Tetrahymena

The potential exposure of titanate nanotubes (TNTs) to wildlife and humans may occur as a result of increased use and application as functional nanomaterials. However, there is a dearth of knowledge regarding the pathways of uptake and excretion of TNTs and their toxicity in cells. In this study, three strains of the Tetrahymena genus of free-living ciliates, including a wild type strain (SB210) and two mutant strains (SB255: mucocyst-deficient; NP1: temperature-sensitive "mouthless''), were used to study the pathways of uptake and excretion and evaluate the cytotoxicity of TNTs. The three Tetrahymena strains were separately exposed to 0, 0.01, 0.1, 1 or 10 mg/L of TNTs, and cells were collected at different time points for quantification of intracellular TNTs (e.g., 5, 10, 20, 40, 60, 90 and 120 min) and evaluation of cytotoxicity (12 and 24 h). TNT contents in NP1 and SB255 were greater or comparable to the contents in SB210 while exposure to 10 mg/L TNTs in 120 min. Furthermore, exposure to 10 mg/L TNTs for 24 h caused greater decreases in cell density of NP1 (38.2 %) and SB255 (36.8 %) compared with SB210 (26.5 %) and upregulated the expression of caspase 15 in SB210. Taken together, our results suggested that TNT uptake by pinocytosis and excretion by exocytosis in Tetrahymena, and the exposure could cause cytotoxicity which can offer novel insights into the accumulation kinetics of nanotubes and even nanomaterials in single cell.

The role of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists in female fertility preservation

Advances in anticancer treatments have resulted in increasing survival rates among cancer patients. Accordingly, the quality of life after treatment, particularly the preservation of fertility, has gradually emerged as an essential consideration. Cryopreservation of embryos or unfertilized oocytes has been considered as the standard method of fertility preservation among young women facing gonadotoxic chemotherapy. Other methods, including ovarian suppression and ovarian tissue cryopreservation, have been considered experimental. Recent large-scale randomized controlled trials have demonstrated that temporary ovarian suppression using gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRHa) during chemotherapy is beneficial for preventing chemotherapy-induced premature ovarian insufficiency in breast cancer patients. It should also be emphasized that GnRHa use during chemotherapy does not replace established fertility preservation methods. All young women facing gonadotoxic chemotherapy should be counseled about and offered various options for fertility preservation, including both GnRHa use and cryopreservation of embryos, oocytes, and/or ovarian tissue.

Gender-specific aspects related to type of fertility preservation strategies and access to fertility care

Survivorship is an area of paramount importance to be addressed as early as possible after cancer diagnosis by all health care providers. On this regard, cancer care in young patients often poses several age-related considerations among which fertility and pregnancy-related issues have a crucial role. According to the available guidelines on the topic, all patients with cancer diagnosed during their reproductive years should be provided a proper oncofertility counselling before starting anticancer treatments. This is an important step in order to inform patients about the potential treatment-induced gonadotoxicity and the available strategies for fertility preservation so that they can be referred as early as possible to fertility specialists if potentially interested in these options.In this manuscript, we aim to provide an up to date overview on the available efficacy and safety data with the main strategies for fertility preservation in male and female cancer patients in order to help optimising the oncofertility counselling performed by healthcare providers involved in cancer care and dealing with young patients. In male patients with cancer, sperm cryopreservation is the standard technique for fertility preservation. Oocyte/embryo cryopreservation, ovarian tissue cryopreservation and temporary ovarian suppression with luteinising hormone-releasing hormone agonists during chemotherapy are the main options in female patients with cancer.A multidisciplinary management building a strong network between fertility and oncology/haematology units is crucial to properly address fertility care in all young patients with cancer, at both diagnosis and during oncologic follow-up. Discussing fertility and pregnancy-related issues with young patients with cancer has to be considered mandatory nowadays keeping in mind that returning to a normal life (including the possibility to have a family and to live with as few side effects as possible) should be considered an important ambition in cancer care in the 21st century .

Burning Questions in the Oncofertility Counseling of Young Breast Cancer Patients

The improved prognosis of breast cancer patients makes survivorship issues an area of crucial importance. In this regard, an increased attention is needed toward the development of potential anticancer treatment-related long-term side-effects, including gonadal failure and infertility in young women. Therefore, fertility preservation and family planning are crucial issues to be addressed in all young women of reproductive age with newly diagnosed cancer. Despite a growing availability of data on the efficacy and safety of fertility preservation options and the fact that conceiving after prior history of breast cancer has become more accepted over time, there are still several gray zones in this field so that many physicians remain uncomfortable to deal with these topics. The purpose of this review is to answer some of the most controversial questions frequently asked by patients during their oncofertility counseling, in order to provide a detailed and up-to-date overview on the evidence available in this field to physicians involved in the care of young women with breast cancer.