Functional Role of N-Terminal Extension of Human AP Endonuclease 1 In Coordination of Base Excision DNA Repair via Protein-Protein Interactions

APE1 condensation in nucleoli of non-cancer cells depends on rRNA transcription and forming G-quadruplex RNA structures

APE1 [apurinic/apyrimidinic (AP) endodeoxyribonuclease 1] is the main endonuclease of the base excision repair pathway acting on abasic (AP) sites in DNA. APE1 is an abundant nuclear protein, and improper expression or localization of this factor could lead to the accumulation of toxic DNA intermediates. Altered APE1 subcellular distribution and expression are associated with cancer development, suggesting the importance of a fine-tuning mechanism for APE1 activities. Recent works highlighted the presence of APE1 within nucleoli of cancer cells and the ability of APE1 to form biomolecular condensate. However, whether secondary structures of ribosomal RNA (rRNA) influence the nucleolar localization of APE1 remains poorly understood. Since protein overexpression can result in artificial nucleolar accumulation, it is imperative to have appropriate cellular models to study APE1 trafficking under physiological conditions. To address this issue, we generated a murine embryonic stem cell line expressing endogenous fluorescent-tagged APE1. Live-cell imaging demonstrates that APE1 nucleolar accumulation requires active rRNA transcription and is modulated by different genotoxicants. In vitro experiments showed that APE1 condensate formation depends on RNA-forming G-quadruplex structures and relies on critical lysine residues. This study sheds light on the mechanisms underlying APE1 trafficking to the nucleolus and the formation of RNA-dependent APE1 nucleolar condensates.

Coordination between human DNA polymerase β and apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease 1 in the course of DNA repair

Coordination of enzymatic activities in the course of base excision repair (BER) is essential to ensure complete repair of damaged bases. Two major mechanisms underlying the coordination of BER are known today: the "passing the baton" model and a model of preassembled stable multiprotein repair complexes called "repairosomes." In this work, we aimed to elucidate the coordination between human apurinic/apyrimidinic (AP) endonuclease APE1 and DNA polymerase Polβ in BER through studying an impact of APE1 on Polβ-catalyzed nucleotide incorporation into different model substrates that mimic different single-strand break (SSB) intermediates arising along the BER pathway. It was found that APE1's impact on separate stages of Polβ's catalysis depends on the nature of a DNA substrate. In this complex, APE1 removed 3' blocking groups and corrected Polβ-catalyzed DNA synthesis in a coordinated manner. Our findings support the hypothesis that Polβ not only can displace APE1 from damaged DNA within the "passing the baton" model but also performs the gap-filling reaction in the ternary complex with APE1 according to the "repairosome" model. Taken together, our results provide new insights into coordination between APE1 and Polβ during the BER process.

Inhibition of DNA Repair Enzymes as a Valuable Pharmaceutical Approach

The DNA repair system plays a crucial role in maintaining the integrity of the genome [...].

Fluorescently labeled human apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease APE1 reveals effects of DNA polymerase β on the APE1-DNA interaction

The base excision repair (BER) pathway involves sequential action of DNA glycosylases and apurinic/apyrimidinic (AP) endonucleases to incise damaged DNA and prepare DNA termini for incorporation of a correct nucleotide by DNA polymerases. It has been suggested that the enzymatic steps in BER include recognition of a product-enzyme complex by the next enzyme in the pathway, resulting in the "passing-the-baton" model of transfer of DNA intermediates between enzymes. To verify this model, in this work, we aimed to create a suitable experimental system. We prepared APE1 site-specifically labeled with a fluorescent reporter that is sensitive to stages of APE1-DNA binding, of formation of the catalytic complex, and of subsequent dissociation of the enzyme-product complex. Interactions of the labeled APE1 with various model DNA substrates (containing an abasic site) of varied lengths revealed that the enzyme remains mostly in complex with the DNA product. By means of the fluorescently labeled APE1 in combination with a stopped-flow fluorescence assay, it was found that Polβ stimulates both i) APE1 binding to an abasic-site-containing DNA duplex with the formation of a catalytically competent complex and ii) the dissociation of APE1 from its product. These findings confirm DNA-mediated coordination of APE1 and Polβ activities and suggest that Polβ is the key trigger of the DNA transfer between the enzymes participating in initial steps of BER.

Oxidative stress-mediated epigenetic regulation by G-quadruplexes

Many cancer-associated genes are regulated by guanine (G)-rich sequences that are capable of refolding from the canonical duplex structure to an intrastrand G-quadruplex. These same sequences are sensitive to oxidative damage that is repaired by the base excision repair glycosylases OGG1 and NEIL1–3. We describe studies indicating that oxidation of a guanosine base in a gene promoter G-quadruplex can lead to up- and downregulation of gene expression that is location dependent and involves the base excision repair pathway in which the first intermediate, an apurinic (AP) site, plays a key role mediated by AP endonuclease 1 (APE1/REF1). The nuclease activity of APE1 is paused at a G-quadruplex, while the REF1 capacity of this protein engages activating transcription factors such as HIF-1α, AP-1 and p53. The mechanism has been probed by in vitro biophysical studies, whole-genome approaches and reporter plasmids in cellulo. Replacement of promoter elements by a G-quadruplex sequence usually led to upregulation, but depending on the strand and precise location, examples of downregulation were also found. The impact of oxidative stress-mediated lesions in the G-rich sequence enhanced the effect, whether it was positive or negative.

Common Kinetic Mechanism of Abasic Site Recognition by Structurally Different Apurinic/Apyrimidinic Endonucleases

Apurinic/apyrimidinic (AP) endonucleases Nfo (Escherichia coli) and APE1 (human) represent two conserved structural families of enzymes that cleave AP-site-containing DNA in base excision repair. Nfo and APE1 have completely different structures of the DNA-binding site, catalytically active amino acid residues and catalytic metal ions. Nonetheless, both enzymes induce DNA bending, AP-site backbone eversion into the active-site pocket and extrusion of the nucleotide located opposite the damage. All these stages may depend on local stability of the DNA duplex near the lesion. Here, we analysed effects of natural nucleotides located opposite a lesion on catalytic-complex formation stages and DNA cleavage efficacy. Several model DNA substrates that contain an AP-site analogue [F-site, i.e., (2R,3S)-2-(hydroxymethyl)-3-hydroxytetrahydrofuran] opposite G, A, T or C were used to monitor real-time conformational changes of the tested enzymes during interaction with DNA using changes in the enzymes' intrinsic fluorescence intensity mainly caused by Trp fluorescence. The extrusion of the nucleotide located opposite F-site was recorded via fluorescence intensity changes of two base analogues. The catalytic rate constant slightly depended on the opposite-nucleotide nature. Thus, structurally different AP endonucleases Nfo and APE1 utilise a common strategy of damage recognition controlled by enzyme conformational transitions after initial DNA binding.

Molecular Mechanisms Regulating the DNA Repair Protein APE1: A Focus on Its Flexible N-Terminal Tail Domain

APE1 (DNA (apurinic/apyrimidinic site) endonuclease 1) is a key enzyme of one of the major DNA repair routes, the BER (base excision repair) pathway. APE1 fulfils additional functions, acting as a redox regulator of transcription factors and taking part in RNA metabolism. The mechanisms regulating APE1 are still being deciphered. Structurally, human APE1 consists of a well-characterized globular catalytic domain responsible for its endonuclease activity, preceded by a conformationally flexible N-terminal extension, acquired along evolution. This N-terminal tail appears to play a prominent role in the modulation of APE1 and probably in BER coordination. Thus, it is primarily involved in mediating APE1 localization, post-translational modifications, and protein–protein interactions, with all three factors jointly contributing to regulate the enzyme. In this review, recent insights on the regulatory role of the N-terminal region in several aspects of APE1 function are covered. In particular, interaction of this region with nucleophosmin (NPM1) might modulate certain APE1 activities, representing a paradigmatic example of the interconnection between various regulatory factors.

The Enigma of Substrate Recognition and Catalytic Efficiency of APE1-Like Enzymes

Despite significant achievements in the elucidation of the nature of protein-DNA contacts that control the specificity of nucleotide incision repair (NIR) by apurinic/apyrimidinic (AP) endonucleases, the question on how a given nucleotide is accommodated by the active site of the enzyme remains unanswered. Therefore, the main purpose of our study was to compare kinetics of conformational changes of three homologous APE1-like endonucleases (insect Drosophila melanogaster Rrp1, amphibian Xenopus laevis xAPE1, and fish Danio rerio zAPE1) during their interaction with various damaged DNA substrates, i.e., DNA containing an F-site (an uncleavable by DNA-glycosylases analog of an AP-site), 1,N⁶-ethenoadenosine (εA), 5,6-dihydrouridine (DHU), uridine (U), or the α-anomer of adenosine (αA). Pre-steady-state analysis of fluorescence time courses obtained for the interaction of the APE1-like enzymes with DNA substrates containing various lesions allowed us to outline a model of substrate recognition by this class of enzymes. It was found that the differences in rates of DNA substrates’ binding do not lead to significant differences in the cleavage efficiency of DNA containing a damaged base. The results suggest that the formation of enzyme–substrate complexes is not the key factor that limits enzyme turnover; the mechanisms of damage recognition and cleavage efficacy are related to fine conformational tuning inside the active site.

Activity of Human Apurinic/Apyrimidinic Endonuclease APE1 Toward Damaged DNA and Native RNA With Non-canonical Structures

The primary role of apurinic/apyrimidinic (AP) endonuclease APE1 in human cells is the cleavage of the sugar phosphate backbone 5' to an AP site in DNA to produce a single-strand break with a 5'-deoxyribose phosphate and 3'-hydroxyl end groups. APE1 can also recognize and incise some damaged or modified nucleotides and possesses some minor activities: 3'-5' exonuclease, 3'-phosphodiesterase, 3'-phosphatase, and RNase H. A molecular explanation for the discrimination of structurally different substrates by the single active site of the enzyme remains elusive. Here, we report a mechanism of target nucleotide recognition by APE1 as revealed by the results of an analysis of the APE1 process involving damaged DNA and native RNA substrates with non-canonical structures. The mechanism responsible for substrate specificity proved to be directly related to the ability of a target nucleotide to get into the active site of APE1 in response to an enzyme-induced DNA distortion.

Modulation of the Apurinic/Apyrimidinic Endonuclease Activity of Human APE1 and of Its Natural Polymorphic Variants by Base Excision Repair Proteins

Human apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease 1 (APE1) is known to be a critical player of the base excision repair (BER) pathway. In general, BER involves consecutive actions of DNA glycosylases, AP endonucleases, DNA polymerases, and DNA ligases. It is known that these proteins interact with APE1 either at upstream or downstream steps of BER. Therefore, we may propose that even a minor disturbance of protein–protein interactions on the DNA template reduces coordination and repair efficiency. Here, the ability of various human DNA repair enzymes (such as DNA glycosylases OGG1, UNG2, and AAG; DNA polymerase Polβ; or accessory proteins XRCC1 and PCNA) to influence the activity of wild-type (WT) APE1 and its seven natural polymorphic variants (R221C, N222H, R237A, G241R, M270T, R274Q, and P311S) was tested. Förster resonance energy transfer–based kinetic analysis of abasic site cleavage in a model DNA substrate was conducted to detect the effects of interacting proteins on the activity of WT APE1 and its single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) variants. The results revealed that WT APE1 activity was stimulated by almost all tested DNA repair proteins. For the SNP variants, the matters were more complicated. Analysis of two SNP variants, R237A and G241R, suggested that a positive charge in this area of the APE1 surface impairs the protein–protein interactions. In contrast, variant R221C (where the affected residue is located near the DNA-binding site) showed permanently lower activation relative to WT APE1, whereas neighboring SNP N222H did not cause a noticeable difference as compared to WT APE1. Buried substitution P311S had an inconsistent effect, whereas each substitution at the DNA-binding site, M270T and R274Q, resulted in the lowest stimulation by BER proteins. Protein–protein molecular docking was performed between repair proteins to identify amino acid residues involved in their interactions. The data uncovered differences in the effects of BER proteins on APE1, indicating an important role of protein–protein interactions in the coordination of the repair pathway.