Pituitary-Adrenal Responses and Glucocorticoid Receptor Expression in Critically Ill Patients with COVID-19

The stress-immune system axis: Exploring the interplay between stress and immunity

The chapter talks about how our body and mind respond to stress and how it affects our immune system. Stress reactions, especially the fight-or-flight reaction, are helpful at first but can be harmful if they last too long. Long-term stress, caused by hormones like cortisol and adrenaline, weakens the immune system and makes people more likely to get sick. Important brain chemicals like serotonin and norepinephrine help control how our immune system works. Also, the connection between our gut and brain is an important way that mental health affects how our immune system functions. Getting older and experiencing stress early in life can affect how our immune system works. Inflammation caused by stress is connected to health issues like heart disease, depression, and autoimmune diseases. There are ways to manage stress, like being mindful and having support from friends, are important for keeping your immune system healthy and lessening harm caused by stress.

Glucocorticoid receptor response and glucocorticoid-induced leucine zipper expression in neutrophils of critically ill patients with traumatic and non-traumatic brain injury

Objective

Critically ill patients, including those with brain injuries (BI), are frequently hospitalized in an intensive care unit (ICU). As with other critical states, an adequate stress response is essential for survival. Research on the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal gland (HPA) axis function in BI has primarily focused on assessing ACTH and cortisol levels. However, the immunological, metabolic, and hemodynamic effects of glucocorticoids (GCs) are mediated through the glucocorticoid receptor (GCR), a ubiquitously distributed intracellular receptor protein. Data on GCR-α expression and its signaling in acute BI injury are lacking.

Methods

We designed a prospective observational study, carried out in one academic multi-disciplinary ICU. Forty-two critically ill patients with acute (BI)were included. These patients suffered from traumatic BI (N= 20), subarachnoid hemorrhage (N= 12), intracranial hemorrhage (N= 7), or ischemic stroke (N= 3). All patients were steroid-free. Twenty-four age and sex-matched healthy controls were used for comparison.

Results

Expression of GCR-α and the glucocorticoid-inducible leucine zipper (GILZ), serum cortisol, interleukins (IL) 6, 8, 10 and TNF- α, and the BI biomarkers glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and total Tau were measured on ICU admission (within 48 hours) and 5-7 days from admission. Compared to healthy controls, in the critically ill patients with BI, GCR-α mRNA expression was significantly downregulated on admission, and after 5-7 days in the ICU (2.3-fold, p<0.05 and 2.6-fold, p<0.01, respectively). Even though GCR-α was downregulated, its downstream gene, GILZ, was expressed at the same levels as in normal controls on admission and was significantly upregulated 5-7 days following admission (2-fold, p<0.001). TNF-α levels were undetectable at both time-points. GCR-α expression levels inversely correlated with IL-6. The levels of cortisol and the BI biomarkers did not differ between the 2 time-points.

Conclusions

We provide novel evidence on the downregulated expression and upregulated signaling of the ligand-binding and functionally active GCR-α isoform in the polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMNs) of critically ill patients with BI. The increased GILZ expression indicates an increased GC sensitivity in the PMNs of BI critically ill patients.

Genetic variability in the glucocorticoid pathway and treatment outcomes in hospitalized patients with COVID-19: a pilot study

Introduction: Corticosteroids are widely used for the treatment of coronavirus disease (COVID)-19. Genetic polymorphisms of the glucocorticoid receptor, metabolizing enzymes, or transporters may affect treatment response to dexamethasone. This study aimed to evaluate the association of the glucocorticoid pathway polymorphisms with the treatment response and short-term outcomes in patients with severe COVID-19. Methods: Our pilot study included 107 hospitalized patients with COVID-19 treated with dexamethasone and/or methylprednisolone, genotyped for 14 polymorphisms in the glucocorticoid pathway. Results: In total, 83% of patients had severe disease, 15.1% had critical disease and only 1.9% had moderate disease. CYP3A4 rs35599367 was the major genetic determinant of COVID-19 severity as carriers of this polymorphism had higher risk of critical disease (OR = 6.538; 95% confidence interval = 1.19-35.914: p = 0.031) and needed intensive care unit treatment more frequently (OR = 10; 95% CI = 1.754-57.021: p = 0.01). This polymorphism was also associated with worse disease outcomes, as those patients had to switch from dexamethasone to methylprednisolone more often (OR = 6.609; 95% CI = 1.137-38.424: p = 0.036), had longer hospitalization (p = 0.022) and needed longer oxygen supplementation (p = 0.040). Carriers of NR3C1 rs6198 polymorphic allele required shorter dexamethasone treatment (p = 0.043), but had higher odds for switching therapy with methylprednisolone (OR = 2.711; 95% CI = 1.018-7.22: p = 0.046). Furthermore, rs6198 was also associated with longer duration of hospitalization (p = 0.001) and longer oxygen supplementation (p = 0.001). NR3C1 rs33388 polymorphic allele was associated with shorter hospitalization (p = 0.025) and lower odds for ICU treatment (OR = 0.144; 95% CI = 0.027-0.769: p = 0.023). GSTP1 rs1695 was associated with duration of hospitalization (p = 0.015), oxygen supplementation and (p = 0.047) dexamethasone treatment (p = 0.022). Conclusion: Our pathway-based approach enabled us to identify novel candidate polymorphisms that can be used as predictive biomarkers associated with response to glucocorticoid treatment in COVID-19. This could contribute to the patient's stratification and personalized treatment approach.

A prospective study on endocrine function in patients with long-COVID symptoms

OBJECTIVE

To investigate hormonal status in patients with long-COVID and explore the interrelationship between hormone levels and long-COVID symptoms.

DESIGN

Prospective observational study.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients who visited our long-COVID outpatients' clinic due to long-COVID symptoms from February 2021 to December 2022.

MEASUREMENTS

Total triiodothyronine, free thyroxine, thyrotropin, thyroglobulin, anti-thyroperoxidase, and antithyroglobulin autoantibodies were measured for thyroid assessment. Other hormones measured were growth hormone, insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1), adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH), serum cortisol, dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEA-S), total testosterone, plasma insulin, and C-peptide. Blood glucose and glycosylated hemoglobin were also measured. To assess adrenal reserve, an ACTH stimulation test was performed. The fatigue assessment scale (FAS) was used to evaluate fatigue severity.

RESULTS

Eighty-four adult patients were included. Overall, 40.5% of the patients had at least one endocrine disorder. These included prediabetes (21.4%), low DHEA-S (21.4%), subclinical hypothyroidism (3.6%), non-specific thyroid function abnormality (7.1%), thyroid autoimmunity (7.1%), low testosterone in males (6.6%), and low IGF-1 (3.6%). All patients had normal adrenal reserve. Long-COVID-19 symptoms were present in all patients and the most commonly reported symptom was fatigue (89.3%). The FAS score was higher than normal (≥ 22) in 42.8% of patients. There were no associations between patients' symptoms and hormone levels. Diabetic patients reported confusion (p = 0.020) and hair loss (p = 0.040) more often than non-diabetics.

CONCLUSIONS

The evaluation of endocrine function 3 months after a positive SARS-CoV2 test revealed only subclinical syndromes. The vast majority of patients reported mainly fatigue, among other symptoms, which were unrelated, however, to endocrine function.

New insights on the potential effect of progesterone in Covid-19: Anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive effects

BACKGROUND

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a pandemic disease caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome CoV type 2 (SARS-CoV-2). COVID-19 is higher in men than women and sex hormones have immune-modulator effects during different viral infections, including SARS-CoV-2 infection. One of the essential sex hormones is progesterone (P4).

AIMS

This review aimed to reveal the association between P4 and Covid-19.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The possible role of P4 in COVID-19 could be beneficial through the modulation of inflammatory signaling pathways, induction of the release of anti-inflammatory cytokines, and inhibition release of pro-inflammatory cytokines. P4 stimulates skew of naïve T cells from inflammatory Th1 toward anti-inflammatory Th2 with activation release of anti-inflammatory cytokines, and activation of regulatory T cells (Treg) with decreased interferon-gamma production that increased during SARS-CoV-2 infection. In addition, P4 is regarded as a potent antagonist of mineralocorticoid receptor (MR), it could reduce MRs that were activated by stimulated aldosterone from high AngII during SARS-CoV-2. P4 active metabolite allopregnanolone is regarded as a neurosteroid that acts as a positive modulator of γ-aminobutyric acid (GABAA ) so it may reduce neuropsychiatric manifestations and dysautonomia in COVID-19 patients.

CONCLUSION

Taken together, the anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory properties of P4 may improve central and peripheral complications in COVID-19.

Hypothalamic-Pituitary Axis Function and Adrenal Insufficiency in COVID-19 Patients

The outbreak of COVID-19 has affected more than half a billion people worldwide and caused more than 6 million deaths since 2019. The responsible virus, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), primarily affects the lungs, but it has multisystemic effects. It is well known that dysfunction of multiple endocrine organs may occur during or after COVID-19. Impairment of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis is of utmost importance as it may lead to death if went undiagnosed. SARS-CoV-2 may cause both primary and secondary adrenal insufficiencies (AIs). The clinical manifestations of AI are generally non-specific and might be attributed to the complications caused by the infection itself. The underlying pathogenetic mechanisms were explained by the immunogenic, vascular effects of the infection or the direct effects of the virus. The diagnosis of AI in critically ill patients with COVID-19 is not straightforward. There is lack of consensus on the cut-off values of basal serum cortisol levels and stimulation tests during the disease. Here we review the literature with a special regard on the evaluation of the HPA axis in patients with COVID-19. We conclude that the possibility of AI should always be kept in mind when dealing with patients with COVID-19, and repeated basal cortisol measurements and the ACTH stimulation test results could guide the clinician during the diagnostic process.

Glucocorticoid Signaling Pathway: From Bench to Bedside

Glucocorticoids were named by Hans Hugo Bruno Selye, the modern father of stress concepts, for their important role in glucose metabolism [...].

Neuroimmunoendocrinology of SARS-CoV 2 Infection

This review is aimed at illustrating and discussing the neuroimmune endocrinological aspects of the SARS-CoV-2 infection in light of the studies on this topic that have so far appeared in the literature. The most characteristic findings and pending controversies were derived by PubMed and Scopus databases. We included original and observational studies, reviews, meta-analysis, and case reports. The entry of the coronavirus into susceptible cells is allowed by the interaction with an ecto-enzyme located on human cells, the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2). SARS-CoV-2 also targets the central nervous system (CNS), including hypothalamic-pituitary structures, as their tissues express ACE2, and ACE2 mRNA expression in hypothalamus and pituitary gland cells has been confirmed in an autoptic study on patients who died of COVID 19. SARS-CoV-2 infection may cause central endocrine disorders in acute phase and in post-COVID period, particularly due to the effects of this virus at CNS level involving the hypothalamic-pituitary axis. The aggression to the hypothalamus-pituitary region may also elicit an autoimmune process involving this axis, responsible consequently for functional disorders of the satellite glands. Adrenal, thyroid and gonadal dysfunctions, as well as pituitary alterations involving GH and prolactin secretions, have so far been reported. However, the extent to which COVID-19 contributes to short- and long-term effects of infection to the endocrine system is currently being discussed and deserves further detailed research.

BACTERIAL PATHOGEN-ASSOCIATED MOLECULAR PATTERNS UPREGULATE HUMAN GLUCOCORTICOID RECEPTOR EXPRESSION IN PERIPHERAL BLOOD MONONUCLEAR CELLS

ABSTRACT

It is well known that bacterial components (pathogen-associated molecular patterns [PAMPs]) induce a proinflammatory response through pattern recognition receptor signaling. What is not known, however, is how the inflammatory response is downregulated. We hypothesize that bacterial products initiate compensatory anti-inflammatory responses by inducing expression of the human glucocorticoid receptor (hGR). Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were isolated from leukocytes concentrated from single human donors (Leukopaks). PBMCs were treated with a gram-negative bacterial component, LPS, or gram-positive bacterial components, lipoteichoic acid (LTA) or peptidoglycan (PGN), for 1, 3, or 13 h. Protein expression of hGR was evaluated by Western blot analysis. RNA was extracted from similarly treated cells for reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction analysis of hGR and cytokine expression. At 13 h after LPS treatment, there was an increase in the reference hGR protein (hGRα) expressed within some but not all PBMCs isolated from Leukopaks. There was also a dose-dependent increase in hGRα expression with increasing concentrations of PGN (10 and 50 μg/mL). LTA, however, did not affect hGRα expression. PGN also increased the mRNA expression of an hGR splice variant, hGR-B(54). The mRNA expression changes for the inflammatory cytokines were Leukopak specific. We found that cell wall components of both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria can increase the expression of hGRα. Although these PAMPs augment the inflammatory response, it seems that there is a simultaneous upregulation of hGRα expression. Because binding of cortisol to hGRα typically induces anti-inflammatory proteins, the same PAMPs that induce an inflammatory response seem to also initiate a negative feedback system by inducing hGRα expression in PBMCs.

COVID-19 patients with altered steroid hormone levels are more likely to have higher disease severity

PURPOSE

This study aims to evaluate the correlations between the severity of the disease and serum steroid levels by analyzing the serum steroid levels in COVID-19 patients with different levels of disease progression and the control group.

METHODS

Morning serum Aldosterone, 11-deoxycortisol, Androstenedione, 17-hydroxyprogesterone, Dihydrotestosterone (DHT), Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA), Corticosterone, Dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEAS), Estrone, Estradiol, Progesterone, 11-deoxycorticosterone, Cortisol, Corticosterone, Androsterone, Pregnenolone, 17-hydroxypregnenolone and 21-deoxycortisol levels were measured in 153 consecutive patients were grouped as mild, moderate, and severe based on the WHO COVID-19 disease severity classification and the control group. Steroid hormone levels were analyzed at once with a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometric method (LC-MS/MS).

RESULTS

In our study, nearly all steroids were statistically significantly higher in the patients' group than in the control group (p &lt; 0.001). Also, DHEA was an independent indicator of the disease severity with COVID-19 CONCLUSIONS: Our study reveals that the alteration in steroid hormone levels was correlated with disease severity. Also, steroid hormone levels should be followed up during COVID-19 disease management.

The Relationship between COVID-19 and Hypothalamic–Pituitary–Adrenal Axis: A Large Spectrum from Glucocorticoid Insufficiency to Excess—The CAPISCO International Expert Panel

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a highly heterogeneous disease regarding severity, vulnerability to infection due to comorbidities, and treatment approaches. The hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis has been identified as one of the most critical endocrine targets of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) that might significantly impact outcomes after infection. Herein we review the rationale for glucocorticoid use in the setting of COVID-19 and emphasize the need to have a low index of suspicion for glucocorticoid-induced adrenal insufficiency, adjusting for the glucocorticoid formulation used, dose, treatment duration, and underlying health problems. We also address several additional mechanisms that may cause HPA axis dysfunction, including critical illness-related corticosteroid insufficiency, the direct cytopathic impacts of SARS-CoV-2 infection on the adrenals, pituitary, and hypothalamus, immune-mediated inflammations, small vessel vasculitis, microthrombotic events, the resistance of cortisol receptors, and impaired post-receptor signaling, as well as the dissociation of ACTH and cortisol regulation. We also discuss the increased risk of infection and more severe illness in COVID-19 patients with pre-existing disorders of the HPA axis, from insufficiency to excess. These insights into the complex regulation of the HPA axis reveal how well the body performs in its adaptive survival mechanism during a severe infection, such as SARS-CoV-2, and how many parameters might disbalance the outcomes of this adaptation.