Hormonal Treatment of Men with Nonobstructive Azoospermia: What Does the Evidence Suggest?

Evaluation of human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells in the treatment of non obstructive azoospermia

BACKGROUND

Non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) represents an infertility problem that is usually difficult to treat. Such patients usually have testicular biopsy of germ cell aplasia or spermatogenic arrest. In recent decades, mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) had been studied thoroughly and proved safe and effective regarding their capability for trans-differentiation into different cell types. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of MSCs local intratesticular injection in induction of spermatogenesis.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

The current study included 87 infertile non-obstructive azoospermic patients. Clinical assessment and repeated semen analysis with centrifugation were done to confirm azoospermia. Karyotyping and AZF study were done. Some of the patients had previous testicular biopsy proving a lack of sperm in the testes. Single intratesticular injection of purified MSCs suspension was done.

RESULTS

20.7% of patients showed sperm in their semen after variable period of time. Hormonal profile among treated patients showed significant improvement regardless success of treatment. Also most of the treated patients appreciated the improvement of their sexual function and libido.

CONCLUSIONS

Bone marrow derived MSCs could be a new hope and therapeutic modality for treatment of refractory cases of NOA.

Sperm retrieval outcomes of contralateral testis in men with nonobstructive azoospermia and unsuccessful unilateral microdissection testicular sperm extraction

▪▪▪.

Prevalence and clinical implications of biochemical hypogonadism in patients with nonobstructive azoospermia undergoing infertility evaluation

Objective

To investigate the prevalence and clinical implications of biochemical hypogonadism in infertile men with nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA).

Design

Cohort study.

Setting

University-affiliated tertiary center for male reproductive health.

Patients

767 consecutive normogonadotropic or hypergonadotropic patients with NOA undergoing infertility evaluation from 2014 to 2021.

Intervention

Patients aged 23-55 years underwent comprehensive clinical, hormonal, genetic, semen analysis, and histopathology evaluations and were classified on the basis of predefined baseline follicle-stimulating hormone (12 IU/L) and total testosterone (350 ng/dL) serum levels cutpoints into four groups: hypergonadotropic hypogonadal, hypergonadotropic eugonadal, normogonadotropic hypogonadal, and normogonadotropic eugonadal. All patients were naïve regarding previous sperm retrieval (SR) or hormonal therapy use.

Main Outcome Measures

The period prevalence of biochemical hypogonadism, defined as testosterone levels of <350 ng/dL, and the distribution of patients per group were computed. The associations between hypogonadism, clinical factors, and SR success were evaluated using multivariable logistic regression analyses. Adjusted relative risks (aRRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated to assess the association between SR and patient classification.

Results

The overall period prevalence of biochemical hypogonadism was 80.8% (95% CI 77.9%-83.4%). The prevalence of patients by group was hypergonadotropic hypogonadal (42.4%, 38.9%-45.9%), normogonadotropic hypogonadal (38.5%; 35.1%-41.9%), hypergonadotropic eugonadal (8.3%; 6.6%-10.5%), and normogonadotropic eugonadal (10.8%; 8.8%-13.2%). Reduced testicular volume and lower estradiol levels were associated with an increased likelihood of hypogonadism. Paternal age was also an independent predictor, with higher age linked to an increased likelihood of hypogonadism. Hypogonadism was less likely in patients with germ cell maturation arrest and more likely in those with Sertoli cell-only. Patients with hypergonadotropic hypogonadism had lower SR success than normogonadotropic eugonadal counterparts (aRR 0.611; 95% CI 0.398-0.855). In the subset of hypogonadal men, hypergonadotropic patients had lower SR success than normogonadotropic participants (aRR 0.632; 0.469-0.811).

Conclusion

The prevalence of biochemical hypogonadism among men with NOA is substantial. Hypogonadism is associated with testicular volume, estradiol levels, age, and histopathology patterns. This condition impacts SR success and emphasizes the need for improved care for men with NOA.

Frequency, morbidity and equity - the case for increased research on male fertility

Currently, most men with infertility cannot be given an aetiology, which reflects a lack of knowledge around gamete production and how it is affected by genetics and the environment. A failure to recognize the burden of male infertility and its potential as a biomarker for systemic illness exists. The absence of such knowledge results in patients generally being treated as a uniform group, for whom the strategy is to bypass the causality using medically assisted reproduction (MAR) techniques. In doing so, opportunities to prevent co-morbidity are missed and the burden of MAR is shifted to the woman. To advance understanding of men's reproductive health, longitudinal and multi-national centres for data and sample collection are essential. Such programmes must enable an integrated view of the consequences of genetics, epigenetics and environmental factors on fertility and offspring health. Definition and possible amelioration of the consequences of MAR for conceived children are needed. Inherent in this statement is the necessity to promote fertility restoration and/or use the least invasive MAR strategy available. To achieve this aim, protocols must be rigorously tested and the move towards personalized medicine encouraged. Equally, education of the public, governments and clinicians on the frequency and consequences of infertility is needed. Health options, including male contraceptives, must be expanded, and the opportunities encompassed in such investment understood. The pressing questions related to male reproductive health, spanning the spectrum of andrology are identified in the Expert Recommendation.

Developments and challenges for new and emergent preparations for male hypogonadism treatment

INTRODUCTION

The specific role of testosterone (T) replacement therapy in patients with late onset hypogonadism is still conflicting. Several available preparations have been developed to restore either fertility and normal testosterone (T) levels (secondary hypogonadism) or just T levels (primary hypogonadism).

AREAS COVERED

Advantages and limitations related to available new treatments will be discussed in detail. In addition, possible news related to preparations in the pipeline will be discussed.

EXPERT OPINION

The selection of a specific T preparation should be adequately discussed with each subject. Transdermal T preparations are those that can preserve, after a unique morning administration, the circadian rhythmicity of T secretion. Conversely, short-acting preparations (such as oral or intranasal) need two- or three-times daily administration, potentially reducing patient compliance. Long acting T preparations, such as injectable T undecanoate have the advantage of bimestrial or trimestral administration, reducing the required number of administrations. The use of non-steroidal selective androgen receptor modulators (SARM), a heterogeneous class of compounds selectively acting on androgen receptor targets, remains investigational due to the lack of the full spectrum of T's action and the possible risk of side effects, despite their potential use in the treatment of muscle wasting and osteoporosis.

Male Infertility: A Review of Key Papers Appearing in the Reproductive Medicine and Andrology Section of the Journal of Clinical Medicine

Male infertility accounts for 30% of infertility cases and its prevalence in the general population approximately ranges between 9 and 15%, according to the available surveys [...].

The Challenges and Hopes in Treating Patients with NOA

Infertility due to the male factor occurs in no less than 50% of investigated couples [...]

Follicle-stimulating hormone treatment for male factor infertility

Follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) treatment has been proven effective in stimulating spermatogenesis and improving the reproductive ability of men with hypogonadotropic hypogonadism, while the usefulness of such a treatment in infertile patients with normal pituitary function is restricted to a subgroup of responders that, however, cannot be identified by the current diagnostic tools before treatment. In this review we summarize the role played by FSH in the modulation of spermatogenesis, the effect of FSH treatment at a standard replacement dose and at higher dose on sperm parameters, spontaneous and in vitro fertilization pregnancy rates, and the efforts made to identify possible responders to FSH treatment.

Male infertility and gonadotropin treatment: What can we learn from real-world data?

Gonadotropin therapy to treat specific male infertility disorders associated with hypogonadotropic hypogonadism is evidence-based and effective in restoring spermatogenesis and fertility. In contrast, its use to improve fertility in men with idiopathic oligozoospermia or nonobstructive azoospermia remains controversial, despite being widely practiced. The existence of two major inter-related pathways for spermatogenesis, including FSH and intratesticular testosterone, provides a rationale for empiric hormone stimulation therapy in both eugonadal and hypogonadal males with idiopathic oligozoospermia or nonobstructive azoospermia. Real-world data (RWD) on gonadotropin stimulating for these patient subsets, mainly using human chorionic gonadotropin and follicle-stimulating hormone, accumulated gradually, showing a positive therapeutic effect in some patients, translated by increased sperm production, sperm quality, and sperm retrieval rates. Although more evidence is needed, current insights from RWD research indicate that selected male infertility patients might be managed more effectively using gonadotropin therapy, with potential gains for all parties involved.

Recombinant gonadotropin therapy to improve spermatogenesis in nonobstructive azoospermic patients – A proof of concept study

Purpose:

Nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA) associated with primary spermatogenic failure is a common cause of male infertility usually considered untreatable; however, some reports have suggested that hormonal stimulation to boost the intra-testicular testosterone level and spermatogenesis might increase the chance of achieving pregnancy using homologous sperm.

Materials and Methods:

We report a series of eight NOA males who received long-term treatment with recombinant human chorionic gonadotropin twice a week for spermatogenesis stimulation. Six males received additional recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) supplementation 150-225 IU twice weekly.

Results:

After recombinant gonadotropin therapy, viable spermatozoa were retrieved from the ejaculate in two patients and by testicular sperm aspiration (TESA) in another two subjects. Singleton spermatozoon retrieved from testes were frozen by vitrification on Cell-Sleeper devices. Two live births were obtained after intracytoplasmic sperm injection with ejaculated spermatozoa and one live birth and an ongoing pregnancy using thawed spermatozoa from TESA.

Conclusion:

Our proof-of-concept study indicates that hormonal therapy with recombinant gonadotropins could be considered in infertile men with NOA as an alternative to sperm donation. Large-scale studies are needed to substantiate hormone stimulation therapy with recombinant gonadotropins in routine clinical practice for this severe form of male infertility.

Recombinant gonadotropin therapy to improve spermatogenesis in nonobstructive azoospermic patients - A proof of concept study

PURPOSE

Nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA) associated with primary spermatogenic failure is a common cause of male infertility usually considered untreatable; however, some reports have suggested that hormonal stimulation to boost the intra-testicular testosterone level and spermatogenesis might increase the chance of achieving pregnancy using homologous sperm.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We report a series of eight NOA males who received long-term treatment with recombinant human chorionic gonadotropin twice a week for spermatogenesis stimulation. Six males received additional recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) supplementation 150-225 IU twice weekly.

RESULTS

After recombinant gonadotropin therapy, viable spermatozoa were retrieved from the ejaculate in two patients and by testicular sperm aspiration (TESA) in another two subjects. Singleton spermatozoon retrieved from testes were frozen by vitrification on Cell-Sleeper devices. Two live births were obtained after intracytoplasmic sperm injection with ejaculated spermatozoa and one live birth and an ongoing pregnancy using thawed spermatozoa from TESA.

CONCLUSION

Our proof-of-concept study indicates that hormonal therapy with recombinant gonadotropins could be considered in infertile men with NOA as an alternative to sperm donation. Large-scale studies are needed to substantiate hormone stimulation therapy with recombinant gonadotropins in routine clinical practice for this severe form of male infertility.

Endocrine aberrations of human nonobstructive azoospermia

Nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA) refers to the failure of spermatogenesis, which affects approximately 1% of the male population and contributes to 10% of male infertility. NOA has an underlying basis of endocrine imbalances since proper human spermatogenesis relies on complex regulation and cooperation of multiple hormones. A better understanding of subtle hormonal disturbances in NOA would help design and improve hormone therapies with reduced risk in human fertility clinics. The purpose of this review is to summarize the research on the endocrinological aspects of NOA, especially the hormones involved in hypothalamic–pituitary–testis axis (HPTA), including gonadotropin-releasing hormone, follicle-stimulating hormone, luteinizing hormone, prolactin, testosterone, estradiol, sex hormone binding globulin, inhibin B, anti-Müllerian hormone, and leptin. For the NOA men associated with primary testicular failure, the quality of currently available evidence has not been sufficient enough to recommend any general hormone optimization therapy. Some other NOA patients, especially those with hypogonadotropic hypogonadism, could be treated with hormonal replacement. Although these approaches have succeeded in resuming the fertility in many NOA patients, the prudent strategies should be applied in individuals according to specific NOA etiology by balancing fertility benefits and potential risks. This review also discusses how NOA can be induced by immunization against hormones.

Prediction Models for Successful Sperm Retrieval in Patients with Non-Obstructive Azoospermia Undergoing Microdissection Testicular Sperm Extraction: Is There Any Room for Further Studies?

Several prediction models for successful sperm retrieval (SSR) in patients with azoospermia due to spermatogenic dysfunction (also termed non-obstructive azoospermia—NOA) have been developed and published in the past years, however their resulting prediction accuracy has never been strong enough to translate their results in the clinical practice. This notwithstanding, the number of prediction models being proposed in this field is growing. We have reviewed the available evidence and found that, although patients with complete AZFc deletion or a history of cryptorchidism may have better probability of SSR compared to those with idiopathic NOA, no clinical or laboratory marker is able to determine whether a patient with NOA should or should not undergo microdissection testicular sperm extraction (mTESE) to have his testicular sperm retrieved. Further research is warranted to confirm the utility of evaluating the expression of noncoding RNAs in the seminal plasma, to individuate patients with NOA with higher probability of SSR.

Performing Microdissection Testicular Sperm Extraction: Surgical Pearls from a High-Volume Infertility Center

Microdissection testicular sperm extraction (mTESE) has been demonstrated to be the gold-standard surgical technique for retrieving testicular sperm in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) as it enables the exploration of the whole testicular parenchyma at a high magnification, allowing the identification of the rare dilated seminipherous tubules that may contain sperm, usually surrounded by thinner or atrophic tubules. MTESE requires a skilled and experienced surgeon whose learning curve may greatly affect the sperm retrieval rate, as demonstrated in previous reports. The present review is intended to offer a precise and detailed description of the mTESE surgical procedure, accompanied by an extensive iconography, to provide urologists with valuable information to be translated into clinical practice. Advice about the pre-surgical and post-surgical management of patients is also offered.

Endocrine Follow-Up of Men with Non-Obstructive Azoospermia Following Testicular Sperm Extraction

Testicular sperm extraction (TESE) is a surgical procedure which, combined with intracytoplasmic sperm injection, constitutes the main treatment for achieving biological parenthood for patients with infertility due to non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA). Although it is effective, TESE procedures might cause structural testicular damage leading to Leydig cell dysfunction and, consequently, temporary or even permanent hypogonadism with long-term health consequences. To a lesser extent, the same complications have been reported for microdissection TESE, which is considered less invasive. The resulting hypogonadism is more profound and of longer duration in patients with Klinefelter syndrome compared with other NOA causes. Most studies on serum follicle-stimulating hormone and luteinizing hormone concentrations negatively correlate with total testosterone concentrations, which depends on the underlying histology. As hypogonadism is usually temporary, and a watchful waiting approach for about 12 months postoperative is suggested. In cases where replacement therapy with testosterone is indicated, temporary discontinuation of treatment may promote the expected recovery of testosterone secretion and revise the decision for long-term treatment.

Intrasurgical parameters associated with successful sperm retrieval in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia undergoing salvage microdissection testicular sperm extraction

BACKGROUND

Patients with non-obstructive azoospermia with a previously failed conventional testicular sperm extraction may undergo a salvage microdissection testicular sperm extraction with the probability of successful sperm retrieval being almost dependent upon the number of previous surgical attempts and to different histopathologic categories.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether the seminiferous tubules pattern and the histological categories could affect the sperm retrieval rate in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia undergoing salvage microdissection testicular sperm extraction after failed conventional testicular sperm extraction.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Seventy-nine patients undergoing unilateral or bilateral salvage microdissection testicular sperm extraction were evaluated. During microdissection testicular sperm extraction, if present, dilated tubules were retrieved, otherwise, tubules with slightly larger caliber than that of the surroundings were removed. When no dilated tubule or tubule with slightly larger caliber was found, not dilated tubules were excised. A prediction model was built with seminiferous tubules pattern and testis histology as covariates.

RESULTS

Sperm retrieval was successful in 30 out of 79 patients. The prediction model correctly classified 88.3% of cases, explained the 29.7% variability of the outcome, and significantly predicted the microdissection testicular sperm extraction outcome with a sensitivity of 67.7% and a specificity of 90.2%, Both tubules with slightly larger caliber and not dilated tubules were negatively associated with the chance of retrieving spermatozoa. Among the histological categories, only early maturation arrest was significant to the model (log(SSR) = 0.57 - 1.9SDT - 3.3NDT - 1.76EMA) (where SSR is sperm retrieval rate, SDT is tubule with slightly larger caliber, NDT is not dilated tubule, and EMA is early maturation arrest). The model had a clearly useful discrimination (area under the curve = 0.814), the estimated performance was 0.8105, and internal calibration was acceptable (p > 0.05).

DISCUSSION

Seminiferous tubules pattern and testis histology may reliably explain the salvage microdissection testicular sperm extraction outcome in all patients with non-obstructive azoospermia apart from those with early maturation arrest, where the homogeneous apparent seminiferous tubules pattern may be misleading.

CONCLUSION

The outcome of salvage microdissection testicular sperm extraction can be predicted by the same intrasurgical parameters that have been demonstrated to predict the outcome of microdissection testicular sperm extraction in naïve patients with non-obstructive azoospermia.

Differential Diagnosis of Azoospermia in Men with Infertility

The differential diagnosis between obstructive and nonobstructive azoospermia is the first step in the clinical management of azoospermic patients with infertility. It includes a detailed medical history and physical examination, semen analysis, hormonal assessment, genetic tests, and imaging studies. A testicular biopsy is reserved for the cases of doubt, mainly in patients whose history, physical examination, and endocrine analysis are inconclusive. The latter should be combined with sperm extraction for possible sperm cryopreservation. We present a detailed analysis on how to make the azoospermia differential diagnosis and discuss three clinical cases where the differential diagnosis was challenging. A coordinated effort involving reproductive urologists/andrologists, geneticists, pathologists, and embryologists will offer the best diagnostic path for men with azoospermia.

The Novel Key Genes of Non-obstructive Azoospermia Affect Spermatogenesis: Transcriptomic Analysis Based on RNA-Seq and scRNA-Seq Data

Non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) is one of the most important causes of male infertility. It is mainly characterized by the absence of sperm in semen repeatedly or the number of sperm is small and not fully developed. At present, its pathogenesis remains largely unknown. The goal of this study is to identify hub genes that might affect biomarkers related to spermatogenesis. Using the clinically significant transcriptome and single-cell sequencing data sets on the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database, we identified candidate hub genes related to spermatogenesis. Based on them, we performed Gene Ontology (GO) functional enrichment analysis, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) enrichment pathway analyses, protein-protein interaction (PPI) network analysis, principal component analysis (PCA), cell cluster analysis, and pseudo-chronological analysis. We identified a total of 430 differentially expressed genes, of which three have not been reported related to spermatogenesis (C22orf23, TSACC, and TTC25), and the expression of these three hub genes was different in each type of sperm cells. The results of the pseudo-chronological analysis of the three hub genes indicated that TTC25 was in a low expression state during the whole process of sperm development, while the expression of C22orf23 had two fluctuations in the differentiating spermatogonia and late primary spermatocyte stages, and TSACC showed an upward trend from the spermatogonial stem cell stage to the spermatogenesis stage. Our research found that the three hub genes were different in the trajectory of sperm development, indicating that they might play important roles in different sperm cells. This result is of great significance for revealing the pathogenic mechanism of NOA and further research.