Local Anesthetics and Recurrence after Cancer Surgery-What's New? A Narrative Review

Potential influence of different peri-operative analgesic regimens on tumour biology and outcome after oncologic surgery: A narrative review

The management of peri-operative pain is one of the pillars of anaesthesia and is of particular importance in patients undergoing surgery for solid malignant tumours. Amongst several options, the most commonly employed analgesic regimens involve opioids, NSAIDs and regional anaesthesia techniques with different local anaesthetics. In recent years, several research reports have tried to establish a connection between peri-operative anaesthesia care and outcome after cancer surgery. Experimental studies have indicated that certain pain management substances may influence cancer progression, mainly by modifying the tumour's response to surgical stress and peri-operative inflammation. However, these promising in-vitro and in-vivo data have yet to be confirmed by randomised clinical trials. The reason for this might lie with the nature of tumour biology itself, and in the diversity of patient and tumour phenotypes. In a translational approach, future research should therefore concentrate on patient and tumour-related factors or biomarkers, which might either influence the tumour and its microenvironment or predict potential responses to interventions, including the choice of the analgesic. This might not only be relevant for the daily practice of clinical anaesthesia, but would also be of great importance for patients undergoing cancer surgery, who might be able to receive an individualised anaesthetic regimen based on their phenotypic profile.

Anesthetic Approaches and Their Impact on Cancer Recurrence and Metastasis: A Comprehensive Review

Cancer recurrence and metastasis remain critical challenges following surgical resection, influenced by complex perioperative mechanisms. This review explores how surgical stress triggers systemic changes, such as neuroendocrine responses, immune suppression, and inflammation, which promote the dissemination of residual cancer cells and circulating tumor cells. Key mechanisms, such as epithelial-mesenchymal transition and angiogenesis, further enhance metastasis, while hypoxia-inducible factors and inflammatory responses create a microenvironment conducive to tumor progression. Anesthetic agents and techniques modulate these mechanisms in distinct ways. Inhaled anesthetics, such as sevoflurane, may suppress immune function by increasing catecholamines and cytokines, thereby promoting cancer progression. In contrast, propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia mitigates stress responses and preserves natural killer cell activity, supporting immune function. Opioids suppress immune surveillance and promote angiogenesis through the activation of the mu-opioid receptor. Opioid-sparing strategies using NSAIDs show potential in preserving immune function and reducing recurrence risk. Regional anesthesia offers benefits by reducing systemic stress and immune suppression, though the clinical outcomes remain inconsistent. Additionally, dexmedetomidine and ketamine exhibit dual effects, both enhancing and inhibiting tumor progression depending on the dosage and context. This review emphasizes the importance of individualized anesthetic strategies to optimize long-term cancer outcomes. While retrospective studies suggest potential benefits of propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia and regional anesthesia, further large-scale trials are essential to establish the definitive role of anesthetic management in cancer recurrence and survival.

The Role of Anesthetic Management in Lung Cancer Recurrence and Metastasis: A Comprehensive Review

Lung cancer remains a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Although surgical treatment is a primary approach, residual cancer cells and surgery-induced pathophysiological changes may promote cancer recurrence and metastasis. Anesthetic agents and techniques have recently been shown to potentially impact these processes by modulating surgical stress responses, immune function, inflammatory pathways, and the tumor microenvironment. Anesthetics can influence immune-modulating cytokines, induce pro-inflammatory factors such as HIF-1α, and alter natural-killer cell activity, affecting cancer cell survival and spread. Preclinical studies suggest volatile anesthetics may promote tumor progression by triggering pro-inflammatory signaling, while propofol shows potential antitumor properties through immune-preserving effects and reductions in IL-6 and other inflammatory markers. Additionally, opioids are known to suppress immune responses and stimulate pathways that may support cancer cell proliferation, whereas regional anesthesia may reduce these risks by decreasing the need for systemic opioids and volatile agents. Despite these findings, clinical data remain inconclusive, with studies showing mixed outcomes across patient populations. Current clinical trials, including comparisons of volatile agents with propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia, aim to provide clarity but highlight the need for further investigation. Large-scale, well-designed studies are essential to validate the true impact of anesthetic choice on cancer recurrence and to optimize perioperative strategies that support long-term oncologic outcomes for lung cancer patients.

Chitosan, a Natural Polymer, is an Excellent Sustained-Release Carrier for Amide Local Anesthetics

Local anesthetics, particularly amide types, play a crucial role in perioperative anesthesia to alleviate pain and manage chronic, long-term pain, with their brief effect period remaining a universal challenge that needs resolution. There is a high anticipation for creating materials that maintain prolonged effectiveness of local anesthetics through a straightforward administration technique. Chitosan is the most typical natural amino polymer, which is highly reactive and easy to modify. It has been widely and deeply used in the field of medicine. At present, it is mainly used in tissue regeneration and repair, hemostasis and wound healing, antibacterial and anti-infection, disease diagnosis and treatment detection, and drug delivery. In the field of anesthesia, chitosan is regarded as a potential perfect carrier for the sustained release of amide local anesthetics. This document aims to analyze the current application of chitosan as a prolonged-release substance in amide-type local anesthetics, encapsulate the associated research advancements, and subsequently investigate the practicality and prospects of its medical uses.

Perioperative Immunosuppressive Factors during Cancer Surgery: An Updated Review

Surgical excision of the primary tumor represents the most frequent and curative procedure for solid malignancies. Compelling evidence suggests that, despite its beneficial effects, surgery may impair immunosurveillance by triggering an immunosuppressive inflammatory stress response and favor recurrence by stimulating minimal residual disease. In addition, many factors interfere with the immune effectors before and after cancer procedures, such as malnutrition, anemia, or subsequent transfusion. Thus, the perioperative period plays a key role in determining oncological outcomes and represents a short phase to circumvent anesthetic and surgical deleterious factors by supporting the immune system through the use of synergistic pharmacological and non-pharmacological approaches. In line with this, accumulating studies indicate that anesthetic agents could drive both protumor or antitumor signaling pathways during or after cancer surgery. While preclinical investigations focusing on anesthetics' impact on the behavior of cancer cells are quite convincing, limited clinical trials studying the consequences on survival and recurrences remain inconclusive. Herein, we highlight the main factors occurring during the perioperative period of cancer surgery and their potential impact on immunomodulation and cancer progression. We also discuss patient management prior to and during surgery, taking into consideration the latest advances in the literature.

Ropivacaine suppresses the progression of renal cell carcinoma through regulating the lncRNA RMRP/EZH2/CCDC65 axis

BACKGROUND

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is a common malignancy. Local anesthetics were displayed powerful effects against various cancers. This study aims to probe the functions and molecular mechanism of ropivacaine in RCC.

METHODS

Different concentrations of ropivacaine were performed to administrate RCC cells including 786-O and Caki-1 cells. Cell viability and cell apoptosis were examined using CCK-8 and flow cytometry, respectively. Cell migration and invasion were determined by transwell assay. RMRP and CCDC65 expression was firstly predicted using TCGA dataset and further validated in RCC cells using qRT-PCR and western blot. The interactions among RMRP, EZH2 and CCDC65 were verified by RNA immunoprecipitation (RIP) and chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assays.

RESULTS

Ropivacaine effectively suppressed RCC cell viability, migration and invasion and enhanced cell apoptosis rate. Aberrantly elevated RMRP expression in RCC tissues was predicted by TCGA database. Interestingly, overexpressed RMRP observed in RCC cells could be also blocked upon the administration of ropivacaine. Likewise, RMRP knockdown further strengthened ropivacaine-mediated tumor suppressive effects on RCC cells. In terms of mechanism, RMRP directly interacted with EZH2, thereby modulating the histone methylation of CCDC65 to silence its expression. Moreover, ropivacaine inhibited tumor growth in mice bearing RCC tumor through regulating RMRP/EZH2/CCDC65 axis.

CONCLUSION

In sum up, our work revealed that ropivacaine suppressed capacities of RCC cell viability, migration and invasion through modulating the RMRP/EZH2/CCDC65 axis, which laid the experimental foundation of ropivacaine for clinical application in the future.

Impact of anesthetic factors on prognosis of patients with non-small cell lung cancer after surgery

Background

Nowadays, the influence of anesthesia management on the prognosis of cancer patients has been widely concerned. The goal of this study is to assess the association between anesthetic factors and the prognosis of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after surgery.

Methods

Patients with NSCLC who underwent surgery from January 1, 2006, to December 31, 2009 were selected. Cox proportional hazards model and Logistic regression analysis model were used to screen the independent predictors of prognosis of patients. The primary endpoint was postoperative overall survival (OS), and the secondary endpoint was postoperative recurrence-free survival (RFS) and postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs).

Results

A total of 588 patients were included into the final analysis. The overall RFS was 4.4 [interquartile range (IQR), 1.1-10.1] years, and the OS was 6.2 (IQR, 2.4-10.2) years. Age ≥60 years, advanced tumor stage, and maximal tumor size >3 cm were associated with shortened survival, whereas high BMI grade, mediastinal lymph node dissection, perioperative fentanyl equivalents >28.2 µg/kg, and high tumor grade were associated with prolonged survival (P<0.05); perioperative glucocorticoid administration delayed recurrence (P<0.05); advanced tumor stage and perioperative fentanyl equivalents >28.2 µg/kg were associated with an increased PPCs risk (P<0.05).

Conclusions

The findings from this study revealed that perioperative anesthetic factors may impact the prognosis of patients with NSCLC after surgery. Perioperative opioid and glucocorticoid exposure were independent predictors for outcomes. However, perioperative fentanyl equivalents over 28.2 µg/kg seemed to be beneficial to OS, but contribute to the occurrence of PPCs.

Systemic Anti-Inflammatory Effects of Intravenous Lidocaine in Surgical Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

There has recently been increasing evidence that the use of perioperative intravenous lidocaine infusion possesses analgesic, opioid-sparing and anti-inflammatory effects in surgical patients. Although opioid-sparing and analgesic properties have been strongly supported, the anti-inflammatory features are not well established in elective surgery. Therefore, the aim of this systematic review is to examine the effect of perioperative intravenous lidocaine infusion on postoperative anti-inflammatory status in patients undergoing elective surgery. A search strategy was created to identify suitable randomised clinical trials (RCTs) in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and Clinicaltrials.gov databases until January 2023. RCTs that evaluated the effect of intravenous lidocaine infusion, compared with placebo, on adult patients who underwent elective surgery, in inflammatory markers response were included. Exclusion criteria consisted of paediatric patients, animal studies, non-RCT methodology, intervention without intravenous lidocaine, inadequate control group, duplicated samples, ongoing studies and lack of any relevant clinical outcome measures. The following inflammatory markers-interleukin (IL)-6, tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α, IL-1RA, IL-8, IL-10, C-reactive protein (CRP), IL-1, IL-1β, interferon (IFN)-γ, cortisol, IL-4, IL-17, high-mobility group protein B1 (HMGB1) and transforming growth factor (TGF)-β-were evaluated as outcomes in this review. A total of 21 studies, including 1254 patients, were identified. Intravenous lidocaine infusion significantly reduced the change from IL-6 baseline levels at the end of surgery compared to a placebo (standardised mean difference [SMD]: -0.647, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -1.034 to -0.260). Usage of lidocaine was associated with a significant reduction in other postoperative pro-inflammatory markers, such as TNF-α, IL-1RA, IL-8, IL-17, HMGB-1 and CRP. There was no significant difference in other markers, such as IL-10, IL-1β, IL-1, IFN-γ, IL-4, TGF-β and cortisol. This systematic review and meta-analysis provide support for the administration of perioperative intravenous lidocaine infusion as an anti-inflammatory strategy in elective surgery.

The Effect of Different Anesthetic Techniques on Proliferation, Apoptosis, and Gene Expression in Colon Cancer Cells: A Pilot In Vitro Study

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer is highly common and causes high mortality rates. Treatment for colorectal cancer is multidisciplinary, but in most cases the main option remains surgery. Intriguingly, in recent years, a number of studies have shown that a patient's postoperative outcome may be influenced by certain anesthetic drugs. Our main objective was to compare the effect of propofol-total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) with sevoflurane anesthesia and to investigate the potential role of intravenous lidocaine on colon cancer cell functions. We tested the effects of serum from colorectal cancer patients undergoing TIVA vs. sevoflurane anesthesia with or without lidocaine on HCT 116 cell lines; on proliferation, apoptosis, migration, and cell cycles; and on cancer-related gene expressions.

METHODS

60 patients who were scheduled for colorectal cancer surgery were randomized into four different groups (two groups with TIVA and two groups with sevoflurane anesthesia with or without intravenous lidocaine). Blood samples were collected at the start and at the end of surgery. HCT 116 cells were exposed to the patients' serum.

RESULTS

15 patients were included in each of the study groups. We did not find any significant difference on cell viability or apoptosis between the study groups. However, there was an increased apoptosis in propofol groups, but this result was not statistically significant. A significant increase in the expression profile of the TP53 gene in the propofol group was registered (p = 0.029), while in the other study groups, no significant differences were reported. BCL2 and CASP3 expressions increased in the sevoflurane-lidocaine group without statistical significance.

CONCLUSIONS

In our study, serum from patients receiving different anesthetic techniques did not significantly influence the apoptosis, migration, and cell cycle of HCT-116 colorectal carcinoma cells. Viability was also not significantly influenced by the anesthetic technique, except the sevoflurane-lidocaine group where it was increased. The gene expression of TP53 was significantly increased in the propofol group, which is consistent with the results of similar in vitro studies and may be one of the mechanisms by which anesthetic agents may influence the biology of cancer cells. Further studies that investigate the effects of propofol and lidocaine in different plasma concentrations on different colon cancer cell lines and assess the impacts of these findings on the clinical outcome are much needed.

Non-metabolic functions of phosphofructokinase-1 orchestrate tumor cellular invasion and genome maintenance under bevacizumab therapy

BACKGROUND

Glioblastoma (GBM) is a highly lethal malignancy for which neoangiogenesis serves as a defining hallmark. The anti-VEGF antibody, bevacizumab, has been approved for the treatment of recurrent GBM, but resistance is universal.

METHODS

We analyzed expression data of GBM patients treated with bevacizumab to discover potential resistance mechanisms. Patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) and cultures were interrogated for effects of phosphofructokinase-1, muscle isoform (PFKM) loss on tumor cell motility, migration, and invasion through genetic and pharmacologic targeting.

RESULTS

We identified PFKM as a driver of bevacizumab resistance. PFKM functions dichotomize based on subcellular location: cytosolic PFKM interacted with KIF11, a tubular motor protein, to promote tumor invasion, whereas nuclear PFKM safeguarded genomic stability of tumor cells through interaction with NBS1. Leveraging differential transcriptional profiling, bupivacaine phenocopied genetic targeting of PFKM, and enhanced efficacy of bevacizumab in preclinical GBM models in vivo.

CONCLUSION

PFKM drives novel molecular pathways in GBM, offering a translational path to a novel therapeutic paradigm.

Enhanced Antitumor Activity of Lidocaine Nanoparticles Encapsulated by a Self-Assembling Peptide

Although local anesthetics (LAs) such as lidocaine have been traditionally used for pain relief, their antitumor activity has attracted more and more attentions in recent years. However, since nearly all LAs used in clinic are in their hydrochloride forms with small molecular weight and high water-solubility, their fast absorption and clearance greatly limit their antitumor activity in vivo. To better exploit the antitumor activity of LAs, lidocaine nanoparticles (LNPs) are prepared by using a self-assembling peptide to encapsulate the hydrophobic base form of lidocaine. In cultured A375 human melanoma cells, the LNPs show much higher cellular uptake level than the clinic formulation of lidocaine hydrochloride, which leads to enhanced efficacy in inhibiting the proliferation, migration and invasion of the cells, as well as in inducing cell apoptosis. Compared with lidocaine hydrochloride, LNPs can also significantly slow down the release rate of lidocaine. In nude mice, LNPs can effectively inhibit the development of solid tumors from seeded A375 cells and prevent the recurrence of tumors after surgical excision. These results indicate that by using self-assembling peptide to fabricate nanoparticle formulations of local anesthetics, their antitumor activity can be significantly enhanced, suggesting a potential postoperative treatment to prevent tumor recurrence after surgical excision.

Effect of intravenous lidocaine infusion on perioperative cellular immunity and the quality of postoperative recovery in breast cancer patients: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer has become the most common malignancy worldwide. Experimental and, retrospective, clinical data indicate that anaesthetic technique might influence the risk of metastasis after cancer surgery by modulating the immune system. The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of perioperative lidocaine injection on immune cells such as T lymphocytes and natural killer cells (NK cells) and the quality of postoperative recovery in breast cancer patients and to propose new ideas and relevant theoretical evidence for the selection of anesthetic protocols for perioperative tumor patients.

METHODS

Women (n=68) undergoing primary breast tumour resection were randomly assigned to received 2% lidocaine (n=34; group L) or placebo (normal saline; n=34; group S). Venous blood was collected thirty minutes before surgery (T0), after tumor removal (T1), immediately after surgery (T2), 24 h after surgery (T3), and 48 h after surgery (T4). The percentages of NK cells and T lymphocyte subsets (CD3+, CD4+, CD8+, CD4+/CD8+) in peripheral blood were detected by flow cytometry. Patients' quality of recovery-15 (QoR-15) scores were recorded by questionnaire before and 24 h after the operation, as well as intraoperative propofol and remifentanil dosages, the frequency of 24 h postoperative remedial analgesia, and the incidence of nausea and vomiting, dizziness, and chest tightness.

RESULTS

There were 62 patients included in the study, and 60 patients were finally analyzed. The difference in the changing trend of NK cell levels in the 2 groups over time was statistically significant (F=7.675, P=0.008). The intraoperative changing trends of CD3+ T cells, CD4+ T cells, and the CD4+/CD8+ ratio over time differed significantly between the 2 groups of patients (P<0.05), whereas the trends of CD8+ T cells did not differ significantly (P>0.05). The QoR-15 score at 24 h after surgery was higher in Group L (128.50±20.25) than in Group S (117.50±19.50), and the difference was statistically significant (P=0.005). No adverse events such as cardiac arrhythmia and lidocaine toxicity occurred in both groups during the perioperative period.

CONCLUSIONS

Continuous intravenous pumping of lidocaine during the perioperative period has little effect on immune function in breast cancer patients and promotes postoperative recovery.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2100050445.

Combined spinal and general anesthesia attenuate tumor promoting effects of surgery. An experimental animal study

Background

Radical prostatectomy, a standard management approach for localized Prostate Cancer (PC), may cause a stress response associated with immune modulating effects. Regional anesthesia was hypothesized to reduce the immune effects of surgery by minimizing the neuroendocrine surgical stress response, thus mitigating tumor cells dissemination. Our primary objective was to investigate whether the use of spinal blocks attenuates PC tumor cells dissemination on an animal model. We also assessed the number of circulating NK cells and the amount of inflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines.

Materials and methods

A subcutaneous tumor model, with PC-3M cell line transfected with a luciferase-producing gene (PC-3M-luc-C6) was used. After proper tumor establishment and before tumors became metastatic, animals were submitted to tumor excision surgeries under general or combined (general and spinal) anesthesia. A control group was only anesthetized with general anesthesia.

Results

The subcutaneous tumor model with PC-3M-luc-C6 cells was effective in causing distant metastasis after 35 days. The number of circulating tumor cells increased in animals that underwent surgery under general anesthesia alone compared to the group submitted to combined anesthesia. Interleukin 6 levels were different in all groups, with increase in the general anesthesia group.

Conclusion

Our results suggest that combination of spinal and general anesthesia may attenuate the suppression of innate tumor immunity and it might be related to a reduction in the neuroendocrine response to surgery.

Institutional protocol number

Animal Ethics Committee 1332/2019.

•

Regional anesthesia is related to a reduction in the neuroendocrine response to surgery.

•

Spinal anesthesia combined with general anesthesia modulates Circulating Tumor Cells and cytokines after tissue damage.

•

General anesthesia combined to spinal block could reduce cancer cells dissemination in the postoperative period.

Application of Anesthetics in Cancer Patients: Reviewing Current Existing Link With Tumor Recurrence

Surgery remains the most effective cancer treatment, but residual disease in the form of scattered micro-metastases and tumor cells is usually unavoidable. Whether minimal residual disease results in clinical metastases is a function of host defense and tumor survival and growth. The much interesting intersection of anesthesiology and immunology has drawn increasing clinical interest, particularly, the existing concern of the possibility that the perioperative and intraoperative anesthetic care of the surgical oncology patient could meaningfully influence tumor recurrence. This paper examines current data, including recent large clinical trials to determine whether the current level of evidence warrants a change in practice. Available pieces of evidence from clinical studies are particularly limited, largely retrospective, smaller sample size, and often contradictory, causing several questions and providing few answers. Recent randomized controlled clinical trials, including the largest study (NCT00418457), report no difference in cancer recurrence between regional and general anesthesia after potentially curative surgery. Until further evidence strongly implicates anesthesia in future clinical trials, clinicians may continue to choose the optimum anesthetic-analgesic agents and techniques in consultation with their cancer patients, based on their expertise and current best practice.

Direct Cytotoxic and Indirect, Immune-Mediated Effects of Local Anesthetics Against Cancer

Local anesthetics are frequently employed during surgery in order to control peri- and postoperative pain. Retrospective studies have revealed an unexpected correlation between increased long-term survival and the use of local anesthetics during oncological surgery. This effect of local anesthetics might rely on direct cytotoxic effects on malignant cells or on indirect, immune-mediated effects. It is tempting to speculate, yet needs to be formally proven, that the combination of local anesthetics with oncological surgery and conventional anticancer therapy would offer an opportunity to control residual cancer cells. This review summarizes findings from fundamental research together with clinical data on the use of local anesthetics as anticancer standalone drugs or their combination with conventional treatments. We suggest that a better comprehension of the anticancer effects of local anesthetics at the preclinical and clinical levels may broadly improve the surgical treatment of cancer.