Age as a Prognostic Factor in Patients with Ewing Sarcoma-The Polish Sarcoma Group Experience

18 F-FDG PET Metabolic Parameters for the Prediction of Histological Response to Induction Chemotherapy in Osteosarcoma and Ewing Sarcoma : A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis

PURPOSE

This study aimed to evaluate the ability of 18 F-FDG PET/CT metabolic parameters to predict the histological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with osteosarcoma and Ewing sarcoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This systematic review and network meta-analysis adhered to the PRISMA-NMA and Cochrane guidelines. Electronic databases were searched from January 2008 to January 2024; this search was supplemented by snowballing methods. The risk of bias was evaluated with QUADAS-2, and evidence certainty was assessed using the GRADE approach. The prognostic value of 18 F-FDG PET/CT parameters, including pretreatment and posttreatment SUVs (SUV1, SUV2 and the SUV2/SUV1 ratio), metabolic tumor volume (MTV1, MTV2, ΔMTV), and total lesion glycolysis (TLG1, TLG2, ΔTLG), was examined.

RESULTS

The meta-analysis of 18 studies (714 patients) identified the ΔTLG, ΔMTV, and SUV ratio as superior predictors of histological response. The changes in metabolic activity, as indicated by these parameters, provided a robust indication of treatment effectiveness. Baseline parameters showed limited predictive value compared with posttreatment assessments. The study's robustness was confirmed through meta-regression, which revealed that the predictive value of the SUV2 and SUV ratio was consistent across various cutoff thresholds.

CONCLUSIONS

18 F-FDG PET/CT metabolic parameters, particularly those measuring changes posttherapy, are effective in predicting the histological response in patients with osteosarcoma and Ewing sarcoma. These findings underscore the potential of 18 F-FDG PET/CT in guiding early treatment decisions, thereby enhancing personalized therapeutic approaches.

Ewing sarcoma among children 5 years of age or younger: Is it a different disease?

INTRODUCTION

Children ≤5 years of age with Ewing's sarcoma (ES) possibly have a distinct disease biology, data on which are scarce. We evaluated clinical features, outcomes, and prognostic factors of ES among children with age ≤5 years.

METHODS

Children with ES registered between 2003 and 2019 were included. Baseline clinical and treatment details were retrieved from medical records. Prognostic factors were identified using multivariable Cox regression. Clinical features and outcomes of children ≤5 years were compared with those greater than 5 years by chi-square and log-rank tests. Propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis was done to evaluate the impact of age on survival in the metastatic and localized subgroups.

RESULTS

Out of the 859 patients, 86 (10%) were ≤5 years of age (median age 4 years, 60 males [69.8%]). The most common location was the extremities (37.2%), followed by thorax (27.9%) and head and neck (H&N) (22.1%); baseline metastases were seen in 25 patients (29.8%). The median event-free-survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were 25.6 and 68.7 months, respectively. Metastatic disease predicted inferior OS (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.54, p = .018) and EFS (HR = 2.47, p = .007], symptom duration ≤3 months predicted an inferior OS (HR = 2.17, p = .048). Compared to age greater than 5 years, younger children had more H&N and less pelvic primaries (p < .001) and lesser baseline metastases (p = .037). PSM analysis did not reveal any significant impact of age on OS in the metastatic (HR = 1.59, p = .29) or localized cohort (HR = 1.77, p = .09).

CONCLUSIONS

Children with ES ≤5 years of age have a distinct favorable clinical presentation. However, age is not an independent prognostic factor for survival outcomes when adjusted for confounders.

Impact of age on survival according to molecular tumor findings in children and adolescents with soft-tissue and bone sarcoma: The BIOSCA project

BACKGROUND

Adolescents (15-19 years) with sarcoma are known to have significantly worse survival than children (0-14 years). One possible reason may be that the adolescent sarcomas exhibit specific biological characteristics resulting in differences in clinical presentation and treatment resistance behaviors. The BIOSCA project aims to further explore these age-related differences in survival accounting for molecular tumor characteristic in children and adolescents with sarcoma.

METHODS

A retrospective national population-based observational study with documented somatic genetic analyses was conducted between 2011 and 2016 of all patients aged from 0 to 17 years with a diagnosis of sarcoma using the National Registry of Childhood Cancers Database.

RESULTS

A total of 1637 children (0-9years: 40%), preadolescents (10-14years: 35%) and adolescents (15-17 years: 25%) with a diagnosis of bone (N = 845) or soft-tissue (N = 792) sarcoma were included. Adolescents had significantly worse outcome for undifferentiated small round cell sarcoma (USRCS), alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma (ARMS), and epithelioid sarcoma. Five-year overall survivals were worse among CIC-rearranged USRCS cases (47% [95%CI:21-69]) as compared to other USRCS, and PAX3::FOXO1 ARMS patients (44% [95%CI:32-55]) as compared to other ARMS. Adjusting for stage and genomic-profiling status, adolescents with USRCS were 1.6-fold more likely to die than children (P = 0.05), while the difference in survival between age of ARMS patients was weaken. Indeed, the prevalence of PAX3::FOXO1 increased significantly with age.

CONCLUSION

Age was an independent prognostic factor of outcome only in patients with USRCS, while the association between age and survival of patients with ARMS could be partly explained by differences in prevalence of PAX3::FOXO1.

Targeting the EphA2 pathway: could it be the way for bone sarcomas?

Bone sarcomas are malignant tumors of mesenchymal origin. Complete surgical resection is the cornerstone of multidisciplinary treatment. However, advanced, unresectable forms remain incurable. A crucial step towards addressing this challenge involves comprehending the molecular mechanisms underpinning tumor progression and metastasis, laying the groundwork for innovative precision medicine-based interventions. We previously showed that tyrosine kinase receptor Ephrin Type-A Receptor 2 (EphA2) is overexpressed in bone sarcomas. EphA2 is a key oncofetal protein implicated in metastasis, self-renewal, and chemoresistance. Molecular, genetic, biochemical, and pharmacological approaches have been developed to target EphA2 and its signaling pathway aiming to interfere with its tumor-promoting effects or as a carrier for drug delivery. This review synthesizes the main functions of EphA2 and their relevance in bone sarcomas, providing strategies devised to leverage this receptor for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes, with a focus on its applicability in the three most common bone sarcoma histotypes: osteosarcoma, chondrosarcoma, and Ewing sarcoma.

Ewing's sarcoma of the head and neck: A systematic review

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the present study was to conduct a systematic review of head and neck Ewing sarcoma (ES) concerning patients' demographic and clinical features, histopathological findings, treatment, follow-up, and survival rate.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An electronic search was undertaken in four databases. Articles describing case reports or case series were included. Outcomes were evaluated by the Kaplan-Meier method along with Cox regression.

RESULTS

The search yielded 186 studies describing 227 ES cases. The mean age was 22.7 years, and males were slightly more affected. Interestingly, more than half the cases were diagnosed up to 20 years. The respiratory tract was the most reported site, followed by the jawbones. Clinically, symptomatic swelling or nodules were described, with a mean duration of 4 months. Management involved multimodal treatment regimens. Local recurrence, lymph node and distant metastasis were observed in 10.7%, 12.6%, and 20.3% of cases, respectively. Statistical analysis revealed that older patients with distant metastasis had a lower overall survival rate (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

This study provides an overall view of head and neck ES that can assist oral and maxillofacial pathologists with the diagnosis and extend the knowledge of surgeons and oncologists about this condition.

Factors Influencing the Outcome of Patients with Primary Ewing Sarcoma of the Sacrum

Background

Ewing sarcoma (EwS) is a rare and highly malignant bone tumor primarily affecting children, adolescents, and young adults. The pelvis, trunk, and lower extremities are the most common sites, while EwS of the sacrum as a primary site is very rare, and only few studies focusing on this location are published. Due to the anatomical condition, local treatment is challenging in sacral malignancies. We analyzed factors that might influence the outcome of patients suffering from sacral EwS.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed data of the GPOH EURO-E.W.I.N.G 99 trial and the EWING 2008 trial, with a cohort of 124 patients with localized or metastatic sacral EwS. The study endpoints were overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS). OS and EFS were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and univariate comparisons were estimated using the log-rank test. Hazard ratios (HRs) with respective 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated in a multivariable Cox regression model.

Results

The presence of metastases (3y-EFS: 0.33 vs. 0.68; P < 0.001; HR = 3.4, 95% CI 1.7 to 6.6; 3y-OS: 0.48 vs. 0.85; P < 0.001; HR = 4.23, 95% CI 1.8 to 9.7), large tumor volume (≥200 ml) (3y-EFS: 0.36 vs. 0.69; P=0.02; HR = 2.1, 95% CI 1.1 to 4.0; 3y-OS: 0.42 vs. 0.73; P=0.04; HR = 2.1, 95% CI 1.03 to 4.5), and age ≥18 years (3y-EFS: 0.41 vs. 0.60; P=0.02; HR = 2.6, 95% CI 1.3 to 5.2; 3y-OS: 0.294 vs. 0.59; P=0.01; HR = 2.92, 95% CI 1.29 to 6.6) were revealed as adverse prognostic factors.

Conclusion

Young age seems to positively influence patients` survival, especially in patients with primary metastatic disease. In this context, our results support other studies, stating that older age has a negative impact on survival. Tumor volume, metastases, and the type of local therapy modality have an impact on the outcome of sacral EwS. Level of evidence: Level 2. This trial is registered with NCT00020566 and NCT00987636.

Does primary tumor resection improve survival for patients with sarcomas of pelvic bones, sacrum, and coccyx who have metastasis at diagnosis ?

BACKGROUND

Recent studies demonstrated that primary tumor resection (PTR) improves survival of patients with metastatic bone sarcomas. However, it remains quite unclear regarding the role of PTR in the treatment of sarcomas of pelvic bones with synchronous metastasis at diagnosis.

METHODS

Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program, we enrolled a total of 385 patients with sarcomas of pelvic bones, sacrum, and coccyx who have metastasis at initial diagnosis, including 139 patients with osteosarcoma, 176 with Ewing sarcoma, and 70 with chondrosarcoma. Association between PTR and disease-specific survival (DSS) were investigated using the univariable and multivariable Cox regression models. Hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were reported. Representative institutional PTR strategies and clinical outcomes for patients with metastatic pelvic sarcomas from our cancer center were displayed.

RESULTS

The usage rate of PTR was 28.1% (39/139) in osteosarcoma, 13.6% (24/176) in Ewing sarcoma, and 41.4% (29/70) in chondrosarcoma with synchronous metastatic lesions. PTR was not associated with an improved DSS for metastatic pelvic osteosarcoma (HR = 0.686, 95% CI = 0.430 ~ 1.094, P = 0.113) and Ewing sarcoma (HR = 0.580, 95% CI = 0.291 ~ 1.154, P = 0.121). The use of PTR was associated with an improved DSS for metastatic pelvic chondrosarcoma (HR = 0.464, 95% CI = 0.225 ~ 0.954, P = 0.037).

CONCLUSION

Primary lesion resection may provide a survival benefit for metastatic chondrosarcoma, but not for osteosarcoma and Ewing sarcoma of pelvic bones, sacrum, and coccyx. This population-based study recommends an active surgical intervention for metastatic chondrosarcoma while non-surgical treatment for metastatic osteosarcoma and Ewing sarcoma of the pelvis in terms of survival improvement.