In Vitro Activity and Clinical Outcomes of Clofazimine for Nontuberculous Mycobacteria Pulmonary Disease

Therapeutic developments for tuberculosis and nontuberculous mycobacterial lung disease

Tuberculosis (TB) drug discovery and development has undergone nothing short of a revolution over the past 20 years. Successful public-private partnerships and sustained funding have delivered a much-improved understanding of mycobacterial disease biology and pharmacology and a healthy pipeline that can tolerate inevitable attrition. Preclinical and clinical development has evolved from decade-old concepts to adaptive designs that permit rapid evaluation of regimens that might greatly shorten treatment duration over the next decade. But the past 20 years also saw the rise of a fatal and difficult-to-cure lung disease caused by nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM), for which the drug development pipeline is nearly empty. Here, we discuss the similarities and differences between TB and NTM lung diseases, compare the preclinical and clinical advances, and identify major knowledge gaps and areas of cross-fertilization. We argue that applying paradigms and networks that have proved successful for TB, from basic research to clinical trials, will help to populate the pipeline and accelerate curative regimen development for NTM disease.

Why do we use 100 mg of clofazimine in TB and NTM treatment?

Current tuberculosis and non-tuberculous mycobacterial disease guidelines recommend the use of clofazimine in a 100 mg once-daily dose. The rationale behind this exact dose is not provided. I performed a literature review to determine the reasoning behind the current dosing regimen. The current 100 mg once-daily dose of clofazimine stems from a deliberate attempt to find the minimum effective daily dose in leprosy treatment, driven by efficacy, economical and toxicity considerations. While this dose is safe, economical and practical, a higher dose with a loading phase may add relevant efficacy and treatment-shortening potential to both tuberculosis and non-tuberculous mycobacterial disease treatment. We need to revisit dose-response and maximum tolerated dose studies to get the best out of this drug, while continuing efforts to generate more active r-iminophenazine molecules that accumulate less in skin and intestinal tissues and have pharmacokinetic properties that do not require loading doses.

[A pharmacologic approach to treatment of Mycobacterium abscessus pulmonary disease]

Mycobacterium abscessus is a fast-growing non-tuberculous mycobacteria complex causing pulmonary infections, comprising the subspecies abscessus, massiliense and bolletii. Differences are based predominantly on natural inducible macrolide resistance, active in most Mycobacterium abscessus spp abscessus species and in Mycobacterium abscessus spp bolletii but inactive in Mycobacterium abscessus spp massiliense. Therapy consists in long-term treatment, combining multiple antibiotics. Prognosis is poor, as only 40% of patients experience cure. Pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic data on M. abscessus have recently been published, showing that therapy ineffectiveness might be explained by intrinsic bacterial resistance (macrolides…) and by the unfavorable pharmacokinetics of the recommended antibiotics. Other molecules and inhaled antibiotics are promising.

Nontuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary disease and the potential role of SPR720

INTRODUCTION

Nontuberculous mycobacteria infect patients who have structural lung disease or those who are immunocompromised. Nontuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary disease (NTM-PD) is increasing in prevalence. Treatment guidelines for Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) pulmonary disease involve a three-drug regimen with azithromycin, ethambutol, and rifampin, and those of Mycobacterium abscessus complex (MAB) pulmonary disease involve a combination of three or more antimicrobials including macrolides, amikacin, and a β-lactam or imipenem. However, these regimens are poorly tolerated and generally ineffective.

AREAS COVERED

SPR720 is a novel therapeutic agent that has demonstrated activity against a range of NTM species, including MAC and MAB. Encouraging in vitro and pre-clinical data demonstrate that SPR720 is active both alone and in combination with standard-of-care agents, with no evidence of cross-resistance to such agents. It is generally well tolerated with mainly gastrointestinal and headache adverse events of mild or moderate severity.

EXPERT OPINION

Management of NTM-PD is challenging for many reasons including length of therapy, poor efficacy, drug intolerance, recurrence, and resistance development. The current antimicrobial management options for NTM-PD are limited in number and there exists a large unmet need for new treatments. SPR720 has encouraging data that warrant further study in the context of a multidrug regimen.

Clofazimine for the treatment of tuberculosis

Shorter (6-9 months), fully oral regimens containing new and repurposed drugs are now the first-choice option for the treatment of drug-resistant tuberculosis (DR-TB). Clofazimine, long used in the treatment of leprosy, is one such repurposed drug that has become a cornerstone of DR-TB treatment and ongoing trials are exploring novel, shorter clofazimine-containing regimens for drug-resistant as well as drug-susceptible tuberculosis. Clofazimine's repurposing was informed by evidence of potent activity against DR-TB strains in vitro and in mice and a treatment-shortening effect in DR-TB patients as part of a multidrug regimen. Clofazimine entered clinical use in the 1950s without the rigorous safety and pharmacokinetic evaluation which is part of modern drug development and current dosing is not evidence-based. Recent studies have begun to characterize clofazimine's exposure-response relationship for safety and efficacy in populations with TB. Despite being better tolerated than some other second-line TB drugs, the extent and impact of adverse effects including skin discolouration and cardiotoxicity are not well understood and together with emergent resistance, may undermine clofazimine use in DR-TB programmes. Furthermore, clofazimine's precise mechanism of action is not well established, as is the genetic basis of clofazimine resistance. In this narrative review, we present an overview of the evidence base underpinning the use and limitations of clofazimine as an antituberculosis drug and discuss advances in the understanding of clofazimine pharmacokinetics, toxicity, and resistance. The unusual pharmacokinetic properties of clofazimine and how these relate to its putative mechanism of action, antituberculosis activity, dosing considerations and adverse effects are highlighted. Finally, we discuss the development of novel riminophenazine analogues as antituberculosis drugs.