Pulmonary Endarterectomy for Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension: A Systematic Review of the Most Updated Literature

Notch ratio in pulmonary flow predicts long-term survival after pulmonary endarterectomy for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension

BACKGROUND

Assessment of the pattern of the RV outflow tract Doppler provides insights into the hemodynamics of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). We studied whether pre-operative assessment of timing of the pulmonary flow systolic notch by Doppler echocardiography is associated with long-term survival after pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) for CTEPH.

METHODS

Fifty-nine out of 61 consecutive CETPH patients (mean age 53 ± 14 years, 34% male) whom underwent PEA between June 2002 and June 2005 were studied. Clinical, echocardiographic and hemodynamic variables were assessed pre-operatively and repeat echocardiography was performed 3 months after PEA. Notch ratio (NR) was assessed with pulsed Doppler and calculated as the time from onset of pulmonary flow until notch divided by the time from notch until end of pulmonary flow. Long-term follow-up was obtained between May 2021 and February 2022.

RESULTS

Pre-operative mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) was 45 ± 15 mmHg and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) was 646 ± 454 dynes.s.cm-5. Echocardiography before PEA showed that 7 patients had no notch, 33 had a NR < 1.0 and 19 had a NR > 1.0. Three months after PEA, echocardiography revealed a significant decrease in sPAP in long-term survivors with a NR < 1.0 and a NR > 1.0, while a significant increase in TAPSE/sPAP was only observed in the NR < 1.0 group. Mean long-term clinical follow-up was 14 ± 6 years. NR was significantly different between survivors and non-survivors (0.73 ± 0.25 vs. 1.1 ± 0.44, p < 0.001) but no significant differences were observed in mPAP or PVR. Long-term survival at 14 years was significantly better in patients with a NR < 1.0 compared to patients with a NR > 1.0 (83% vs. 37%, p =  < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Pre-operative assessment of NR is a predictor of long-term survival in CTEPH patients undergoing PEA, with low mortality risk in patients with NR < 1.0. Long-term survivors with a NR < 1.0 and NR > 1.0 had a significant decrease in sPAP after PEA. However, the TAPSE/sPAP only significantly increased in the NR < 1.0 group. In the NR < 1.0 group, the 6-min walk test increased significantly between pre-operative and at 1-year post-operative follow-up. NR is a simple echocardiographic parameter that can be used in clinical decision-making for PEA.

Controlling Nutritional Status Score Predicts 1-Year Outcomes in Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension

Background

The prognosis for patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) using their nutritional status has not been established. We investigated the relationship between the prognosis of patients with CTEPH and the Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score, which is a nutritional assessment tool.

Methods and Results

A total of 157 patients with CTEPH was enrolled in the study. The primary outcome was defined as the composite outcome of all-cause mortality and non-elective hospitalization due to heart failure. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to determine the cutoff CONUT score for predicting the 1-year rate of the primary outcome. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to the significant cutoff value and compared. Undernutrition was observed in 51.6% of patients. ROC analysis revealed a significant cutoff CONUT score of 3.5 (area under the curve=0.789). The incidence rate of the primary composite outcome was higher in the high CONUT group (score ≥4) than in the low CONUT group (score ≤3; 20% vs. 2.2%; P<0.001). Cox analysis revealed the CONUT score per point increase was an independent risk factor for the primary composite outcomes (hazard ratio 2.301; 95% confidence interval 1.081-4.895; P=0.031).

Conclusions

The CONUT score can predict the 1-year rate of all-cause death and non-elective hospitalization in patients with CTEPH.

Riociguat as bridging therapy to pulmonary endarterectomy in patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: a retrospective cohort study

Background

In operable chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) patients, the utilization of bridging therapy with targeted medications prior to pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) remains a topic of controversy, despite being common in cases of severe hemodynamic impairment. This study aims to assess the impact of riociguat as a bridging therapy on postoperative hemodynamics and outcomes.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective study involving patients undergoing PEA from December 2016 to November 2023. Patients were categorized into two groups based on the use of riociguat before PEA. Pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) following riociguat administration was assessed pre-PEA. Postoperative outcomes, including mortality, complications, and hemodynamics, were compared, employing propensity score matching analysis.

Results

Among the patients, 41.8% (n=56) received riociguat as bridging therapy. In patients with PVR ≥800 dynes·sec·cm-5, riociguat resulted in a reduction in PVR {1,207 [974-1,698] vs. 1,125 [928-1,486] dynes·sec·cm-5, P<0.01}, while no significant difference was observed in patients with PVR <800 dynes·sec·cm-5 {641 [474-740] vs. 600 [480-768] dynes·sec·cm-5, P=0.46}. After propensity score matching, each group included 26 patients. The overall perioperative mortality rate was 2.6%. Postoperative PVR {326 [254-398] vs. 361 [290-445] dynes·sec·cm-5, P=0.35} was similar in the riociguat group compared to the control group. The incidence of residual pulmonary hypertension (PH) and other postoperative outcomes were also comparable.

Conclusions

The use of riociguat as bridging therapy demonstrated hemodynamic improvement before PEA in patients with high preoperative PVR. However, no additional benefits in postoperative mortality or hemodynamics were observed.

Post-pulmonary embolism syndrome: A reminder for clinicians

Acute pulmonary embolism (APE) is one of the leading causes of cardiovascular emergencies and the third leading cause of death. Although efforts focus on treating the acute event, patients who survive APE may develop long-term sequelae. Research reveals that approximately half of patients who have suffered an APE do not regain their previous level of function and experience a reduction in their quality of life for several years after the episode. Acute pulmonary embolism can be classified according to the risk of short-term mortality, with most mortality and morbidity concentrated in high-risk and intermediate-risk cases. The first-line treatment for APE is systemic anticoagulation. However, identifying and more aggressively treating people with intermediate to high risk, who have a more favorable risk profile for reperfusion treatments, could reduce short-term mortality and mitigate post-pulmonary embolism syndrome (PPES). Post-pulmonary embolism syndrome refers to a variety of persistent symptoms and functional limitations that occur after an APE. The presence of persistent dyspnea, functional limitations, and/or decreased quality of life after an APE has been recently termed "PPES," although this entity encompasses different manifestations. The most severe cause of persistent dyspnea is chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension, where increased pulmonary artery pressure is due to the fibrotic organization of unresolved APE. Post-PE Syndrome is not always systematically addressed in management guidelines, and its prevalence may be underestimated. More research is needed to fully understand its causes and risk factors. Interventions such as cardiopulmonary rehabilitation have been suggested to improve the quality of life of patients with PPES. A comprehensive, evidence-based approach is essential to effectively prevent and manage PPES and improve the long-term outcomes and well-being of affected patients.

Detrimental Impact of Comorbid Mental Disorders in Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension - A Retrospective Observational Study

Background: The relationship between the prognosis of patients with both chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) and a mental disorder (MD) remains unclear. Methods and Results: The study group comprised 157 patients with CTEPH who underwent right heart catheterization and were subdivided into 2 groups according to the presence of MDs: MD and non-MD. The patients with MDs were defined as those who had visited a psychiatrist and were under psychotropic drug treatment. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause death and worsening of PH. The median follow-up period was 1,164 days. The incidence of the primary composite outcome was higher in the MD group than in the non-MD group (24.0% vs. 6.8%), whereas the all-cause mortality rate was comparable between groups (12.0% vs. 6.1%). The mean pulmonary arterial pressure, cardiac index, and pulmonary vascular resistance at baseline were all similar between groups. The Cox proportional hazards model indicated that MD was an independent risk factor for the primary composite outcome (hazard ratio, 2.990; 95% confidence interval, 1.034-8.642). Conclusions: In the present study, concomitant CTEPH and MD was significantly associated with a poor prognosis and such patients should be carefully followed.

[Fatal course of pulmonary embolism after successful pulmonary endarterectomy: a rare case]

We report a case of a 43-year-old woman who suffered from recurrent pulmonary embolism leading to chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. Pulmonary endarterectomy was performed with good result. However, two years later, after a SARS-CoV2 infection and despite oral anticoagulation therapy, the patient presented with clinical symptoms of pulmonary embolism, which was confirmed by computed tomography as an extensive pulmonary embolism. Despite fibrinolysis therapy and the attempt of interventional thrombus aspiration, the patient died due to non-manageable embolism load.

Evaluation of total intravenous anesthesia with remimazolam in general anesthesia for pulmonary endarterectomy of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: a case report

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) is a treatment modality for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). PEA requires anesthesia management to prevent an increase in pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) and circulatory failure. Therefore, it is necessary to select an anesthetic agent that can achieve these goals as much as possible. On the other hand, remimazolam, a short-acting sedative, was launched in Japan in 2020, and its use in various cases has been increasingly reported. This report demonstrates that remimazolam can be used safely in the anesthetic management of PEA.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 57-year-old man was scheduled to undergo PEA for CTEPH. Remimazolam was used for sedation from induction of anesthesia. Hemodynamics were stable during surgery without circulatory failure. Anesthesia was managed intraoperatively without any particular increase in PVR.

DISCUSSION

Anesthesia was successfully managed without any complications. This case suggests that remimazolam is one of the options for anesthetic management in PEA.