Retrospective Efficacy Analysis of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Rechallenge in Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Efficacy of cross-line anti-programmed death 1/programmed cell death-ligand 1 antibody in the treatment of advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer: A retrospective study

Background and Aims

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) across multiple treatment lines have not yet been evaluated comprehensively. The purpose of this research was to investigate whether or not continuous cross-line ICIs therapy is effective in treating non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods

We conducted a retrospective investigation into the medical histories of 47 patients diagnosed with advanced NSCLC and treated with ICIs at the Peking University First Hospital between January 2018 and June 2022.

Results

Due to the progression of their disease, 14 patients were given the same ICIs, 5 patients were given different ICIs, and 6 patients discontinued taking ICIs altogether. The objective response rates were 7.140% in the ICIs cross-line treatment group, 0% in the replacement of ICIs treatment group, and 0% in the discontinuation of ICIs treatment group. The disease control rates were 64.260% in the ICIs cross-line treatment group, 60% in the replacement of ICIs treatment group, and 0% in the discontinuation of ICIs treatment group. The average overall survival durations of the three groups were 24.020 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 17.061-30.979), 31.643 (95% CI: 23.513-39.774), and 7.997 (95% CI: 3.746-12.247) months, respectively (p = 0.003). The median second progression-free survival (PFS2) durations of the three groups were 4.570 (95% CI: 3.276-5.864), 3.530 (95% CI: 0.674-6.386), and 1.570 (95% CI: 0-4.091) months, respectively (p = 0.091).

Conclusions

Cross-line ICIs cannot improve the prognosis and PFS2 of patients with NSCLC, but compared to discontinuing ICIs, OS may be prolonged. A few patients may benefit from prolonged ICIs therapy.

Retreatment with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in the New Scenario of Immunotherapy in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

The advent of immunotherapy has transformed the treatment paradigm for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In the past few years, several studies have investigated the potential role of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in resectable and unresectable locally advanced disease, achieving remarkable results that led to their approval in clinical practice. However, there is limited evidence on immunotherapy rechallenge after recurrence, with the majority of available knowledge coming from retrospective studies which involve heavily pretreated patients with advanced NSCLC. The recent introduction in the curative setting and the potential regulatory restrictions raise questions about the optimal choice of first-line and subsequent therapies for patients with systemic relapse. The role of immunotherapy readministration in this new scenario needs to be clarified, as well as the identification of patients for whom it is more appropriate, including clinical characteristics, duration of response, switching to other ICIs, reasons for discontinuation and immune-related toxicity. Here, we review literature on rechallenge with immunotherapy, including efficacy, safety profile and potential predictive factors of response.

Extensive Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer with Cystic Brain Metastases: A Report of Two Cases

Objective

Cystic brain metastases (BMs) are rare in small cell lung cancer (SCLC), and there are limited data on the treatment and prognosis of cystic BMs. Whole brain radiotherapy has been the mainstay for BMs since several years. Immune checkpoint inhibitors in extensive stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) have been shown to be suitable for patients who experienced better overall survival and progress-free survival and have been approved as the first-line treatment for ES-SCLC. In this report, we described two ES-SCLC patients developed cystic BMs after immunotherapy, after which the patients continued to treat the primary lesion with immune checkpoint inhibitors and the cystic BMs with radiotherapy.

Case Description

Two male patients were diagnosed with ES-SCLC at the first admission and were subsequently treated with immunotherapy plus platinum therapy, during which cystic BMs developed. One patient received whole brain radiotherapy and the other received whole brain radiotherapy and Gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS). Immunotherapy was continued after the brain lesions were controlled. It has been 33 months since the first patient was diagnosed and is now in stable condition. The other patient achieved an overall survival of 30 months.

Conclusion

This report describes two patients with cystic brain metastases in ES-SCLC. Whole brain radiotherapy has a good effect on local control of cystic brain metastases in small cell lung cancer and can significantly improve the symptoms of patients. At the same time, we treat immunotherapy as the first-line treatment, and then perform cross-immunotherapy after disease progression, combined with anti-vascular targeting drugs. The patient did not develop severe iRAEs.

Safety and efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitor rechallenge in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a retrospective study

We conducted a retrospective study to evaluate the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) rechallenge in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The study included 111 patients who had previously received ICI therapy and experienced disease progression. The primary endpoints assessed were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and objective response rate (ORR). Our findings revealed that the ICI rechallenge showed promising results in improving patient outcomes. OS (r) is the time from rechallenging with immune checkpoint inhibitors to the last follow-up or death from any cause. The median OS (r) was 14.3 months (95% CI 11.3-17.3 months), with a median PFS (r) of 5.9 months (95% CI 4.1-7.7 months). The ORR was 17.1%; the DCR was 82.3%. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that patients without brain or liver metastases had a longer OS (r) compared to those with metastases (21.6 vs. 13.8 months, χ2 = 3.873, P = 0.046; 20.8 vs. 9.1 months, χ2 = 10.733, P = 0.001, respectively). Moreover, patients without driver gene mutations exhibited significantly longer OS than those with mutations or wild-type patients (22.9 vs. 16.1 vs. 7.5 months, χ2 = 10.710, P = 0.005). Notably, patients who switched to a different ICI during the rechallenge had shorter OS than those who did not change medications (10.4 vs. 21.1 months, χ2 = 9.014, P = 0.003). The incidence of immune-related adverse events did not significantly differ between the two treatment phases. These findings suggest that ICI rechallenge may be a viable therapeutic strategy for select NSCLC patients. Further prospective studies are needed to validate these results and guide treatment decisions for advanced NSCLC.

Clinical characteristics and novel strategies of immune checkpoint inhibitor rechallenge therapy for non-small cell lung cancer: a comprehensive review

Treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has entered the immunotherapy era, marked by significant survival improvements due to the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). However, owing to factors, such as disease progression, long-term use, and side effects, some patients discontinue immunotherapy, resulting in limited subsequent treatment option and a negative impact on their survival and quality of life. We have collected relevant data which reveal that ICI rechallenge may be an effective clinical strategy. However, many factors affect the efficacy of rechallenge, including patient characteristics, initial treatment drugs, treatment duration, efficacy, toxicity, and side effects. Additionally, the side effects of rechallenge and mechanisms of reversing drug resistance play crucial roles. Identifying suitable candidates, optimizing treatment plans and duration, enhancing treatment efficacy, and minimizing toxicity and adverse effects in rechallenges are pressing clinical needs. Addressing these issues can provide guidance for the clinical use of immunotherapy rechallenges to better serve patients. This review focuses on the clinical considerations and strategies for immune therapy rechallenges in NSCLC.

Prognostic value of obesity in patients with cancer treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: An updated meta‑analysis and systematic review

Accumulating interest has been surging over the past few years regarding the effects of obesity on immunotherapy. In addition to the body mass index (BMI), imaging-quantified body fat compartments have been investigated. The present study aimed to evaluate the predictive value of the BMI and computed tomography (CT)-based body fat in patients with cancer receiving immunotherapy. For this purpose, the PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane databases were searched from January 2017 to July 2022. Clinical studies evaluating the association between BMI or body fat and survival of patients with cancer treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) were included. In total, 15 studies reporting on the BMI were included in the meta-analysis and 16 studies evaluating body fat were included in the systematic review. According to the classification of the World Health Organization, overweight and obese patients with ICI treatment showed improved overall survival [overweight vs. normal: Hazard ratio (HR)=0.79, 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.64-0.98, P=0.03; obese vs. normal: HR=0.75, 95% CI=0.60-0.94, P=0.013] and progression-free survival (overweight vs. normal: HR=0.82, 95% CI=0.70-0.97, P=0.02; obese vs. normal: HR=0.81, 95% CI=0.65-1.02, P=0.07). Among the articles investigating the effect of body fat composition on the efficacy of immunotherapy, a number of studies included various CT analysis techniques and cutoffs to define body fat composition. Associations of body fat with survival were contradictory in different patients with cancer treated with immunotherapy. Obesity was associated with better survival in patients with cancer treated with ICIs. Further analyses are required to demonstrate the prognostic value of body fat in patients with cancer immunotherapy.

Efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitor rechallenge in non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The aim of the study was to explore the efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) rechallenge in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

Studies that enrolled NSCLC patients treated with two lines of ICIs were included using four databases. The initial line (1L-) and subsequent lines (2L-) of ICIs were defined as 1L-ICI and 2L-ICI, respectively.

RESULTS

A total of 17 studies involving 2100 patients were included. The pooled objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), median progression-free survival (mPFS), and median overall survival (mOS) for 2L-ICIs were 10%, 50%, 3.0 months, and 13.1 months, respectively. The 2L-ICI discontinuation rates caused by toxicities ranged from 0% to 23.5%. Original data were extracted from six studies, covering 89 patients. Patients in whom 1L-ICIs were discontinued following clinical decision (the mPFS of 2L-ICIs was not reach) achieved a more prolonged mPFS of 2L-ICIs than those due to toxicity (5.2 months) and progressive disease (2.1 months) (p < 0.0001). Patients' 1L-PFS for more than 2-years had preferable 2L-ORR (35.0% vs. 9.8%, p = 0.03), 2L-DCR (85.0% vs. 49.0%, p = 0.007), and 2L-mPFS (12.4 vs. 3.0 months, p < 0.0001) than those less than 1-year. Patients administered the same drugs achieved a significantly prolonged mPFS compared with the remaining patients (5.4 vs. 2.3 months, p = 0.0004), and those who did not accept antitumor treatments during the intervals of two lines of ICIs achieved a prolonged mPFS compared to those patients who did accept treatments (7.6 vs. 1.9 months, p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

ICI rechallenge is a useful therapeutic strategy for NSCLC patients, especially suitable for those who achieve long-term tumor remission for more than 2-years under 1L-ICIs.

The Effectiveness of Cancer Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Retreatment and Rechallenge-A Systematic Review

Despite a great success of immunotherapy in cancer treatment, a great number of patients will become resistant. This review summarizes recent reports on immune checkpoint inhibitor retreatment or rechallenge in order to overcome primary resistance. The systematic review was performed according to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. The search was performed using PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus. In total, 31 articles were included with a total of 812 patients. There were 16 retreatment studies and 13 rechallenge studies. We identified 15 studies in which at least one parameter (overall response rate or disease control rate) improved or was stable at secondary treatment. Interval treatment, primary response to and the cause of cessation for the first immune checkpoint inhibitors seem to be promising predictors of secondary response. However, high heterogeneity of investigated cohorts and lack of reporting guidelines are limiting factors for current in-depth analysis.

What to do after immune-checkpoint inhibitors failure in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: an expert opinion and review

INTRODUCTION

Immune-checkpoint inhibitors (IO) have significantly improved outcomes of patients with non-oncogene-addicted non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), becoming the first-line agents for advanced disease. However, resistance remains a significant clinical challenge, limiting their effectiveness.

AREAS COVERED

Hereby, we addressed standard and innovative therapeutic approaches for NSCLC patients experiencing progression after IO treatment, discussing the emerging resistance mechanisms and the ongoing efforts to overcome them. In order to provide a complete overview of the matter, we performed a comprehensive literature search across prominent databases, including PubMed, EMBASE (Excerpta Medica dataBASE), and the Cochrane Library, and a research of the main ongoing studies on clinicaltrials.gov.

EXPERT OPINION

The dynamics of progression to IO, especially in terms of time to treatment failure and burden of progressive disease, should guide the best subsequent management, together with patient clinical conditions. Long-responders to IO might benefit from continuation of IO beyond-progression, in combination with other treatments. Patients who experience early progression should be treated with salvage CT in case of preserved clinical conditions. Finally, patients who respond to IO for a considerable timeframe and who later present oligo-progression could be treated with a multimodal approach in order to maximize the benefit of immunotherapy.

Current Status in Rechallenge of Immunotherapy

The treatment of malignant tumors has entered the era of immunotherapy, and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have brought significant benefits to patients. However, some patients are required to discontinue treatment with ICIs owing to factors such as disease progression and intolerable side effects. Faced with limited subsequent treatment options and complex medical needs, we searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane library, and the NIH clinical trials database and found that ICI rechallenge could be a relevant clinical strategy. The factors that could affect the rechallenge efficacy include the patients' characteristics, therapeutic strategy selection, and the timing of treatment. Multiple factors are used to identify target population, of which clinical features and PD-L1 expression are more potential. Both single ICI rechallenge and combination therapy may have survival benefits. Patients who have tolerated initial immunotherapy well could undergo ICI rechallenge, while patients who have experienced grade 3 or higher immune-related adverse events should be carefully assessed prior to rechallenge. Interventions and the interval between two courses of ICI will clearly have an impact on the efficacy of subsequent treatment. Preliminary data evaluation supports further investigation on ICI rechallenge to identify the factors that could contribute to its efficacy.

SAFFRON-103: a phase 1b study of the safety and efficacy of sitravatinib combined with tislelizumab in patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Some patients with locally advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) respond poorly to anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/anti-programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) treatments. Combination with other agents may improve the outcomes. This open-label, multicenter, phase 1b trial investigated the combination of sitravatinib, a spectrum-selective tyrosine kinase inhibitor, plus anti-PD-1 antibody tislelizumab.

METHODS

Patients with locally advanced/metastatic NSCLC were enrolled (Cohorts A, B, F, H, and I; N=22-24 per cohort). Cohorts A and F included patients previously treated with systemic therapy, with anti-PD-(L)1-resistant/refractory non-squamous (cohort A) or squamous (cohort F) disease. Cohort B included patients previously treated with systemic therapy, with anti-PD-(L)1-naïve non-squamous disease. Cohorts H and I included patients without prior systemic therapy for metastatic disease, no prior anti-PD-(L)1/immunotherapy, with PD-L1-positive non-squamous (cohort H) or squamous (cohort I) histology. Patients received sitravatinib 120 mg orally one time per day plus tislelizumab 200 mg intravenously every 3 weeks, until study withdrawal, disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or death. The primary endpoint was safety/tolerability among all treated patients (N=122). Secondary endpoints included investigator-assessed tumor responses and progression-free survival (PFS).

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 10.9 months (range: 0.4-30.6). Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 98.4% of the patients, with ≥Grade 3 TRAEs in 51.6%. TRAEs led to discontinuation of either drug in 23.0% of the patients. Overall response rate was 8.7% (n/N: 2/23; 95% CI: 1.1% to 28.0%), 18.2% (4/22; 95% CI: 5.2% to 40.3%), 23.8% (5/21; 95% CI: 8.2% to 47.2%), 57.1% (12/21; 95% CI: 34.0% to 78.2%), and 30.4% (7/23; 95% CI: 13.2% to 52.9%) in cohorts A, F, B, H, and I, respectively. Median duration of response was not reached in cohort A and ranged from 6.9 to 17.9 months across other cohorts. Disease control was achieved in 78.3-90.9% of the patients. Median PFS ranged from 4.2 (cohort A) to 11.1 months (cohort H).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with locally advanced/metastatic NSCLC, sitravatinib plus tislelizumab was tolerable for most patients, with no new safety signals and overall safety profiles consistent with known profiles of these agents. Objective responses were observed in all cohorts, including in patients naïve to systemic and anti-PD-(L)1 treatments, or with anti-PD-(L)1 resistant/refractory disease. Results support further investigation in selected NSCLC populations.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT03666143.

Survival and immunotoxicities in association with sex-specific body composition patterns of cancer patients undergoing immune-checkpoint inhibitor therapy - A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Imbalanced body composition is mechanistically connected to dysregulated immune activities. Whether overweight/obesity or sarcopenia has an impact on treatment results in cancer patients undergoing immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy is currently under debate. We aimed to answer if survival rates and occurrence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) were different in obese or sarcopenic patients.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase and CENTRAL for all records published until July 2022 using specific search terms for body composition in combination with terms for ICI regimens. Two authors screened independently. All studies that reported on body mass index or sarcopenia measures were selected for further analysis.

RESULTS

48 studies reporting on overweight/obesity comprising of 19,767 patients, and 32 studies reporting on sarcopenia comprising of 3193 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. In the entire cohort, overweight/obesity was significantly associated with better progression-free survival (PFS; p = 0.009) and overall survival (OS; p <0.00001). Subgroup analyses stratified by sex revealed that overweight/obese males had the strongest survival benefit (PFS: p = 0.05; OS: p = 0.0005), and overweight/obese female patients did not show any. However, overweight/obese patients of both sexes had a higher risk to develop irAEs grade ≥3 (p = 0.0009). Sarcopenic patients showed significantly shorter PFS (p <0.0001) and OS (p <0.0001). The frequency of irAEs did not differ between sarcopenic and non-sarcopenic patients.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis suggests that body composition is associated in a sex-specific manner with survival and irAEs in cancer patients undergoing ICI treatment.

Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Immunotherapy Retreatment in Metastatic Cervical Cancer: A Retrospective Study

Purpose

Metastatic cervical cancer has a poor prognosis, and treatment options are limited. Immunotherapy has been used to achieve disease control in patients with cervical cancer; however, the efficacy of immunotherapy retreatment after disease progression is unclear. This study aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of immunotherapy retreatment in metastatic cervical cancer.

Patients and methods

We retrospectively reviewed the clinical data of patients with metastatic cervical cancer who underwent immunotherapy retreatment after disease progression following previous immunotherapy from June 2019 to April 2021.

Results

Fifteen patients were included in this study. All patients received combination immunotherapy retreatment consisting of camrelizumab, nab-paclitaxel, and apatinib. Four (26.7%) patients achieved partial response while three (20.0%) achieved stable disease. The objective response rate and disease control rate were 26.7% and 46.7%, respectively. The median progression-free survival and overall survival were 3.0 (95% confidence interval: 1.0-5.0) and 8.0 (95% confidence interval: 3.4-12.6) months, respectively. None of the patients discontinued treatment because of intolerable toxicity.

Conclusion

Our findings suggest that the triplet combination immunotherapy retreatment could be a therapeutic option for patients with metastatic cervical cancer who failed initial immunotherapy.

Safety and preliminary activity of pembrolizumab-carboplatin-paclitaxel in heavily pretreated and/or fragile patients with PDL1-positive recurrent/metastatic head and neck cancer

Novel chemo-immunotherapy (chemo-IO) combinations should be evaluated, which may be suitable for cisplatin-unfit or fluoropyrimide-ineligible patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck (R/M SCCHN) to guarantee higher and deeper responses than IO alone. The aim of the present study was to review our experience using pembrolizumab-carboplatin-paclitaxel (pembro + CP) in patients with R/M SCCHN. This was a retrospective study of patients with R/M SCCHN who received pembro + CP in any-line via a compassionate-use program. The present study evaluated safety using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.0, compliance, overall response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1, duration of treatment, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Between March 2020 and August 2021, 10 patients were identified (median age, 64 years; female, 60%; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group 2, 80%). A total of 8 patients received pembro + 3-weekly carboplatin-paclitaxel (3wkCP). A total of 2 patients received pembro + weekly carboplatin-paclitaxel (wkCP). Patients received a median of 3 lines (range, 0-6) of systemic therapy prior to pembro + CP and 80% received IO in previous lines. Grade 1-2 adverse events (AEs) occurred in 100% of patients. Grade 3-5 AEs occurred in 30% of patients [all grade 3 (anemia, neutropenia, thrombopenia, hypertension)]. The mean numbers of pembro + wkCP and pembro + 3wkCP cycles were 2.5 and 6. The ORR (n=7) was 14% (1/7) with one complete response. The DCR was 43% (3/7). The median PFS (n=7) and OS (n=10) times since pembro + CP were 5 months (95% CI, 1-9) and 6 months (95% CI, 0.5-14), respectively. In this small retrospective series of heavily pretreated patients, pembro + CP was well tolerated, and compliance was high. Studies should be conducted to prospectively evaluate the safety and efficacy of this combination in patients with R/M SCCHN.

Efficacy, prognosis and safety analysis of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor rechallenge in advanced lung cancer patients: a cohort study

Background

The rechallenge of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) is now an optional strategy for patients who discontinued ICI due to immune-related adverse events (irAEs) or disease progression. However, little data is available for the prognosis and prognostic factors of patients receiving ICI rechallenge treatment in advanced lung cancer patients. Our study aimed to explore the efficacy, prognosis and safety of patients who received anti-programmed cell death-1/programmed cell death ligand 1 (anti-PD-1/PD-L1) inhibitor rechallenge.

Methods

In our retrospective cohort study, data of advanced lung cancer patients who received anti-PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor and discontinued due to irAEs or disease progression were collected from December 2016 to August 2021. Enrolled patients were categorized into two groups: rechallenge group (R group) and non-rechallenge group (NR group). Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), disease control rate (DCR) and safety data were analyzed. Cox model and subgroup analysis were analyzed according to baseline characteristics, ICI type, the reason for discontinuing ICI, etc. According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1), evaluation was performed routinely every 6–8 weeks after initiating treatment with the PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor. The last follow-up in the study was on September 20, 2021.

Results

Eighty-one patients who met our inclusion criteria were enrolled. In the whole cohort, the R group achieved better OS than the NR group [hazard ratio (HR) =0.176; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.065–0.477; P=0.001). In the irAEs group, the survival analyses showed a trend toward improved OS in the rechallenge subgroup (HR =0.287; 95% CI: 0.081–1.025; P=0.055), and a promising DCR of 75% after an ICI rechallenge. Additionally, the exploration of safety outcomes indicated an acceptable recurrence rate (22.5%) of irAEs and an early onset of irAEs after an ICI rechallenge. In the disease progression group, the rechallenge subgroup did not improve OS (HR =0.214; 95% CI: 0.027–1.695; P=0.144), and the DCR of the rechallenge subgroup was 40% after ICI rechallenge.

Conclusions

ICI rechallenge might be an attractive option for patients who discontinue treatment due to irAEs. For patients with disease progression, further research should be conducted. The recurrence of irAEs and their early onset during the second round of ICI should be considered.

Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based treatment beyond progression with prior immunotherapy in patients with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer: a retrospective study

Background

Although immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) provide unprecedented survival improvement for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), disease progression inevitably occurs. After ICIs failure, limited data exist on whether ICI-based treatment beyond progression (TBP) may be beneficial to advanced NSCLC. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of this treatment approach in advanced NSCLC and identify potential beneficial factors.

Methods

Patients with stage IV NSCLC who received ICI-based treatment after the failure of prior PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor treatments (monotherapy or combination therapy) between January 2016 and July 2020 were enrolled. Their clinical characteristics and treatment procedures were collected, and the follow-up would be performed.

Results

A total of 204 patients were included. All patients had disease progression after prior immunotherapy, with 49.5% (101/204) of patients presenting with new metastasis lesions and the rest 50.5% (103/204) of patients' progression on originate lesions. Within the entire cohort, the median progression-free survival (PFS) and median overall survival (OS) of ICI-based TBP with prior immunotherapy were 5.0 months (95% CI: 4.5-5.5 months) and 15.7 months (95% CI: 14.7-16.8 months), respectively. The objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were 9.3% and 74.0%, respectively. According to the multivariate analysis, ICI-based combination therapy [PFS: hazard ratio (HR), 0.48, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.28-0.84, P=0.011] (OS: HR, 0.44, 95% CI: 0.23-0.85, P=0.014), not having targetable gene alterations (PFS: HR, 0.56, 95% CI: 0.40-0.79, P=0.001) (OS: HR, 0.57, 95% CI: 0.37-0.87, P=0.009), and good response to prior immunotherapy (PFS: HR, 0.36, 95% CI: 0.24-0.53, P<0.0001) (OS: HR, 0.31, 95% CI: 0.19-0.52, P<0.0001) were independently associated with improved PFS and OS. Moreover, disease progression due to appearances of new metastasis (OS: HR, 0.56, 95% CI: 0.37-0.84, P=0.005) was only associated with better OS.

Conclusions

While the ORR in patients with advanced NSCLC receiving ICI-based TBP with prior immunotherapy was limited, the DCR was relatively high in our study which is encouraging. ICI-based treatment strategy may be a reasonable option for patients who progressed from prior immunotherapy. Further prospective studies on larger sample size are warranted.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Rechallenge and Resumption: a Systematic Review

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW

The reintroduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) after disease progression (rechallenge) or immune-related adverse events (irAEs) recovering (resumption) raises questions in terms of efficacy and safety.

RECENT FINDINGS

Here, we reviewed literature data about ICIs rechallenge/resumption in cancer patients along with their clinical characteristics to explore those factors associated with better outcomes. Heterogenous results were pointed out across rechallenge studies with an overall response rate between 0 and 54%, and a progression free survival ranged from 1.5 to 12.9 months and an overall survival between 6.5 and 23.8 months. Better outcomes have been recorded in patients with good ECOG PS, longer duration of initial ICI, discontinuation reason of initial ICI other than progression, and those who received ICI sequence other than the switch between anti-PD1 and anti-PDL1. Studies about ICI resumption highlighted that certain types of irAEs were more likely to relapse at retreatment. These results suggest that ICI rechallenge/resumption can be an interesting strategy for selected patients.

Efficacy of immunotherapy in obese patients with cancer

Obesity is a condition of excessive fat tissue and high body mass index (BMI ≥30), which is increasing worldwide. Excess body weight is associated with poorer results in cancer treatments; however, recent studies emphasized that elevated BMI was associated with improved outcomes in cases treated by immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapies, which is called the obesity paradox. In this review, we discuss the correlation between obesity and cancer immunotherapy, especially ICIs, the underlying mechanisms, and the outcomes in different types of cancers. In addition, we describe the occurrence of immune-related adverse events (irAE) and the effect of gender in obese patients during immunotherapy using all relevant studies with available full texts.

The relationship between NLR/PLR/LMR levels and survival prognosis in patients with non-small cell lung carcinoma treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors

BACKGROUND

The relationship between neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and lymphocyte to monocyte ratio (LMR) and the dire prognosis of non-small cell lung carcinoma patients who received immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are not known yet.

METHODS

We screened the articles that meet the criteria from the database. The relationship between NLR/PLR/LMR levels and the survival and prognosis of non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with ICIs was analyzed. Summarize hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) to study progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Thirty-four studies involving 3124 patients were enrolled in the final analysis. In short, high pre-treatment NLR was related to poor OS (HR = 2.13, 95% CI:1.74-2.61, P < .001, I2 = 83.3%, P < .001) and PFS (HR = 1.77, 95% CI:1.44-2.17, P < .001, I2 = 79.5%, P < .001). Simultaneously, high pre-treatment PLR was related to poor OS (HR = 1.49, 95% CI:1.17-1.91, P < .001, I2 = 57.6%, P = .003) and PFS (HR = 1.62, 95% CI:1.38-1.89, P < .001, I2 = 47.1%, P = .036). In all subgroup analysis, most subgroups showed that low LMR was related to poor OS (HR = 0.45, 95% CI: 0.34-0.59, P < .001) and PFS (HR = 0.60, 95% CI: 0.47-0.77, P < 0.001, I2 = 0.0%, P < .001).

CONCLUSION

High pre-treatment NLR and pre-treatment PLR in non-small cell lung carcinoma patients treated with ICIs are associated with low survival rates. Low pre-treatment and post-treatment LMR are also related to unsatisfactory survival outcomes. However, the significance of post-treatment NLR and post-treatment PLR deserve further prospective research to prove.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors rechallenge in urological tumors: An extensive review of the literature

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have led to a significant change in the treatment of urological tumors where several agents are currently approved. Yet, most patients discontinue treatment due to disease progression or after the onset of severe immune-related adverse events (IRAEs). Following promising results in melanoma patients, retreatment with an ICI is receiving increasing attention as an attractive option for selected patients. We performed a literature review focusing on the feasibility, safety, timing and activity of ICI rechallenge in genitourinary cancers where very little information is available. We classified the different ICI retreatment strategies into three main clinical scenarios: retreatment after terminating a prior course of ICI while still on response; retreatment after interruption due to IRAEs; retreatment after progression while on ICI therapy. The pros and cons of these options in the field of urological tumors are then discussed, and critical suggestions proffered for the design of future clinical trials.

Efficacy and predictors of rechallenge with immune checkpoint inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of rechallenge with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients has not yet been fully clarified. This study aimed to identify the clinical characteristics of patients with NSCLC who benefited from rechallenge with ICIs.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the clinical records of 24 patients who were diagnosed with NSCLC and rechallenged with ICIs between August 2016 and July 2021.

RESULTS

Of the 24 patients included in the study, 11 were in the responder group (45.8%) and 13 in the nonresponder group (54.2%). The number of patients who used a different ICI from that used in the initial therapy was significantly higher in the responder group than in the nonresponder group (p = 0.006). Multivariate analysis identified lung metastasis and female sex as significant independent risk factors for nonresponse to rechallenge with ICIs. Compared to the nonresponder group, the duration of treatment after rechallenge with ICIs was significantly longer in the responder group (p = 0.016), and there was a trend toward longer overall survival (p = 0.059).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with lung cancer who were rechallenged with ICIs and without progressive disease after initial ICI therapy were able to continue ICI therapy for a longer period of time. This may be associated with longer survival. Patients with lung metastases and female patients are more likely to be nonresponsive to rechallenge with ICIs. Administration of a different type of ICI from that used in the initial ICI therapy may result in disease control.

Immune checkpoint inhibitor rechallenge in advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: a retrospective cohort study

PURPOSE

After progression to immunotherapy, the standard of care for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was limited. Administration of the same or different immune checkpoint inhibitors (i.e., ICI rechallenge) may serve as a novel option. The present study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of ICI rechallenge for NSCLC and explore prognostic factors.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, data of advanced or metastatic NSCLC patients rechallenged with ICI at the Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, and Peking Union Medical College between December 2018 and June 2021 were retrieved. Progression-free, overall survivals (PFS; OS), etc. were calculated. Subgroup analyses were conducted according to baseline characteristics, prior treatment results, etc. for prognostic factor exploration using the Cox model.

RESULTS

Forty patients were included. Median age was 59 years. Thirty-one (78%) were male. Twenty-seven (68%) were smokers. Adenocarcinoma (28 [70%]) was the major histological subtype. Median PFS of patients receiving initial ICI was 5.7 months. The most common rechallenge regimens were ICI plus chemotherapy and/or angiogenesis inhibitor (93%). Seventeen (43%) were rechallenged with another ICI. Median PFS for ICI rechallenge was 6.8 months (95% CI 5.8-7.8). OS was immature. Tendencies for longer PFS were observed in nonsmoker or patients with adenocarcinoma, response of stable/progressive disease in initial immunotherapy, or whose treatment lines prior to ICI rechallenge were one/two. However, all results of prognostic factors were nonsignificant.

CONCLUSION

ICI rechallenge may be an option for NSCLC after progress to immunotherapy. Further studies to confirm the efficacy and investigate prognostic factors are warranted.

Clinical utility of liquid biopsy-based companion diagnostics in the non-small-cell lung cancer treatment

Recently, technological advances in the detection and biological characterization of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) have enabled the implementation of liquid biopsy testing into clinical practice. Methods for analysis of liquid biopsies have rapidly evolved over the past few years and have continued to advance, thus providing details about tumor biological characteristics such as tumor progression, metastasis, tumor heterogeneity, genomic mutation profile, clonal evolution, etc. In tandem with technological advances, the implementation of liquid biopsy in routine clinical settings has proceeded. In 2016, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the first ctDNA liquid biopsy test to detect epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene mutations in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) as a companion diagnostic for molecular targeted drug of EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI, EGFR-TKI). More recently, multigene panel assays of liquid biopsy have been approved as companion diagnostics and have been used in routine clinical settings. The estimation of blood tumor mutation burden (bTMB) to predict the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment can be one of the promising approaches to liquid biopsy. The next stage of implementation of liquid biopsy for routine clinical settings is for monitoring of ctDNA after surgical treatment to predict prognosis and to detect disease relapse earlier than conventional imaging diagnosis. Its clinical utility is under assessment in several clinical trials. This review introduces recent advances in liquid biopsy methodology, the development of biomarkers, and its clinical utility in the treatment of NSCLC patients.

For which lung cancer patients is re-administration of immune checkpoint inhibitors effective?

Objective: Currently, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) play a central role in the treatment of lung cancer. However, ICI re-administration is still uncommon, and its utility should be evaluated as early as possible.

Patients and Methods: Twenty-five patients who received ICIs twice or more in any of the drug treatment lines for advanced/relapsed non-small cell lung cancer were included. OS, PFS, ORR, and DCR were examined, and factors such as age, sex, histopathological type, PD-L1 expression, whether radical surgery was performed, driver gene mutations, and immune-related adverse events (irAEs), were evaluated for their relevance and as prognostic factors.

Results: Of the 25 patients, 17 were men and 8 were women, with an average age of 68 ± 8.4 (range, 48–85 years), and histology was non-squamous cell carcinoma/squamous cell carcinoma in 19/6 cases. One driver gene mutation positive case was included. PD-L1 TPS was ≥50%/1–49%/0–1%/ unknown in 7/8/5/5 cases. The first ICI administered was pembrolizumab/nivolumab/atezolizumab in 5/13/7 cases. The median number of courses was 9 (range, 1–52) months, and the median PFS was 9 (95% CI, 6.0–12.0) months. Cytotoxic chemotherapy or radiation therapy was administered to 6 patients during the interval up to re-administration. The second ICI administered was pembrolizumab/nivolumab/atezolizumab in 5/8/12 cases, and all patients received antibody drugs different from those given as the first ICI. The median number of courses was 5 (range, 1–24), and the median PFS was 3 months (95% CI, 1.0–5.0) months. In 5 of the 6 patients (24%) who achieved PFS of 6 months or longer after re-administration, the order of administration was anti-PD-1 antibody to anti-PD-L1 antibody.

Conclusion: The effect of re-administration is limited, but it may be effective depending on the type of cases and the order of ICI administration. Further studies are required to verify its effectiveness.

Early discontinuation of induction therapy in chemoimmunotherapy as an effective alternative to the standard regimen in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a retrospective study

PURPOSE

We aimed to investigate whether induction chemotherapy with less than four courses is as effective as induction chemotherapy with more than four courses in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients receiving chemoimmunotherapy.

METHODS

We retrospectively enrolled 249 patients with NSCLC who received chemoimmunotherapy at 12 centers in Japan between January and December 2019. The patient group that completed less than four courses owing to adverse events (AEs), and received subsequent maintenance therapy was compared to the group that received at least four courses of induction chemotherapy followed by maintenance therapy.

RESULTS

On univariate and multivariate analyses, the patient group that transitioned to maintenance therapy after completing less than four courses of induction chemotherapy had significantly shorter progression-free survival (PFS) than those who completed at least four courses (hazard ratio [HR] 2.15, 95% confidence interval: 1.38-3.37, p < 0.001 and HR 2.32, 95% confidence interval: 1.40-3.84, p = 0.001, respectively). There was no obvious difference in PFS between the group in which induction chemotherapy ended in two or three courses leading to partial or complete response, and the group that continued at least four courses of induction chemotherapy (log-rank test p = 0.53).

CONCLUSION

Treatment efficacy may be maintained if induction chemotherapy is completed in less than four courses owing to development of AEs, and is administered for more than two courses with partial or complete response; efficacy is maintained even on transitioning to maintenance therapy.

Tremelimumab plus durvalumab retreatment and 4-year outcomes in patients with mesothelioma: a follow-up of the open label, non-randomised, phase 2 NIBIT-MESO-1 study

BACKGROUND

The NIBIT-MESO-1 study demonstrated the efficacy and safety of tremelimumab combined with durvalumab in patient with unresectable mesothelioma followed up for a median of 52 months [IQR 49-53]. Here, we report 4-year survival and outcomes after retreatment, and the role of tumour mutational burden (TMB) in identifying patients who might have a better outcome in response to combined therapy.

METHODS

NIBIT-MESO-1 was an open-label, non-randomised, phase 2 trial of patients with unresectable pleural or peritoneal mesothelioma who received intravenous tremelimumab (1 mg/kg bodyweight) and durvalumab (20 mg/kg bodyweight) every 4 weeks for four doses, followed by maintenance intravenous durvalumab at the same dose and schedule for nine doses. In this follow-up study, patients with disease progression following initial clinical benefit-ie, a partial repsonse or stable disease-were eligible for retreatment and with the same doses and schedules for tremelimumab and durvalumab as used in the NIBIT-MESO-1 trial. The primary endpoint, immune-related objective response rate, was evaluated per immune-related modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) or immune-related RECIST 1.1 criteria for patients with pleural or peritoneal malignant mesothelioma, respectively. Key secondary endpoints were overall survival and safety, and TMB was also evaluated post hoc in patients who had tumour tissue available before treatment. The intention-to-treat population was used for analysis of all efficacy endpoints. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02588131.

FINDINGS

40 patients were enrolled in the NIBIT-MESO-1 study between Oct 30, 2015, and Oct 12, 2016. At data cut-off, April 30, 2020, five (13%) of 40 patients were alive, and 35 (88%) patients had died of progressive disease. At a median follow-up of 52 months (IQR 49-53), median overall survival was 16·5 months (95% CI 13·7-19·2). Survival was 20% (eight of 40 patients) at 36 months and 15% (six of 40 patients) and 48 months. 17 (43%) of 40 patients met the criteria for enrolment in the retreatment study and were retreated with at least one dose of tremelimumab and durvalumab. No immune-related objective responses were observed in the 17 retreated patients. Seven (41%) of 17 patients achieved immune-related stable disease. From the start of retreatment to a median follow-up of 24 months (22·0-25·0), median overall survival was 12·5 months (95% CI 0·0-25·8), and survival at 12 months was 52·9%, at 18 months was 35·3%, and at 24 months was 23·5%. There were no grade 3-4 immune-related adverse events in the retreatment cohort. In a post-hoc analysis of 28 patients for whom tumour tissue before treatment was available, patients with a TMB higher than the median value of 8·3 mutations per Mb had a higher median overall survival compared with patients with TMB below the median value, but this difference was non-significant. Moreover, when patients were additionally stratified for ICI retreatment (n=13), there was a significant difference in survival between those with a TMB higher than the median of 8·3 mutations per Mb and those with TMB lower than the median in the retreated cohort (41·3 months vs 17·4 months; p=0·02).

INTERPRETATION

Tremelimumab combined with durvalumab was associated with long-term survival in patients with mesothelioma. Retreatment was safe and resulted in clinically meaningful outcomes, thus suggesting its potential application in the clinical practice of mesothalioma patients.

FUNDING

NIBIT Foundation, Fondazione AIRC, AstraZeneca.

Prognostic Factors of Second-line Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Patients With Advanced-stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Multicenter, Retrospective Study

OBJECTIVES

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) targeting the programmed cell death receptor-1 and its ligand have achieved impressive success in treating patients with advanced-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after failed first-line cytotoxic chemotherapy. However, knowledge on clinical biomarkers that could help select patients who will respond well to second-line ICI therapy is limited.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Medical records of patients with NSCLC treated with first-line platinum-based chemotherapy and subsequent second-line ICI were collected from 6 medical centers between January 2018 and June 2020. Clinical information, pathologic variables, and radiologic findings of the data collected were reviewed. The patients were followed up until the date of the last visit, the death of any cause, or the end of data recording (December 31, 2020).

RESULTS

A total of 181 patients with NSCLC were treated with second-line ICI following first-line platinum-based doublet chemotherapy. The median progression-free survival was 2.0 months (interquartile range, 1.0 to 5.5 mo), and the median overall survival was 12.0 months (interquartile range, 6.0 to 20.0 mo). Low body mass index (BMI) was independently associated with progression-free survival (odds ratio [OR], 0.826; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.723-0.945; P=0.005). Similarly, a low BMI (OR, 0.839; 95% CI, 0.740-0.952; P=0.005) and a high number of metastatic organs (OR, 1.682; 95% CI, 1.156-2.448; P=0.007) were independently associated with the overall survival after second-line ICI therapy.

CONCLUSION

BMI and the number of metastatic sites were significantly associated with second-line ICI therapy outcomes in patients with NSCLC receiving first-line platinum-based chemotherapy.

Rechallenge of immune checkpoint inhibitors: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The role of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) rechallenge in cancer patients is not defined. When ICIs are discontinued due to treatment completion or toxicity, another course of ICIs is feasible in clinical practice, but the amount of data is still quite limited to draw definitive conclusions. Here we report the results of a meta-analysis evaluating efficacy and safety of ICI rechallenge.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane library were searched for studies reporting efficacy and safety of ICI rechallenge. Pooled analysis of response rate (ORR), median progression-free survival (mPFS) and median overall survival (mOS) were calculated.

RESULTS

A total of 49 studies were included in qualitative and quantitative pooled analysis Overall response rate, mPFS and mOS were 21.8 % (range 0-70 %), 4.9 months (range 0-19.1 months) and 15.6 months (range 5.1-39 months), respectively. Incidence of any grade and grade 3-4 adverse events were 52.2 % (range 4-100 %) and 21.5 % (range 0-97.8 %), respectively. In the subgroup of patients who had previously discontinued ICI because of disease progression ORR, mPFS and mOS were 15.2 %, 2.9 and 7.9 months. Patients who had previously discontinued ICI because of toxicity achieved an ORR of 44 % and a mPFS of 13.2 months with the rechallenge.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that rechallenge ICI is an active and feasible strategy, and it could be considered on an individual basis. However, this analysis is based on non-randomized studies. Prospective studies are needed to clarify the role of rechallenge after disease progression or adverse events.

Lymphocyte-to-Monocyte Ratio Is a Predictive Biomarker of Response to Treatment with Nivolumab for Gastric Cancer

INTRODUCTION

Patients with unresectable or recurrent gastric cancer who have an objective response (OR) to nivolumab monotherapy are expected to have a good long-term prognosis. However, the OR rate for nivolumab treatment is low at 11%, and there is a need for biomarkers to predict the treatment response. This study aimed to analyze the significance of systemic inflammation-related variables and clinicopathologic characteristics as predictive markers of response to nivolumab monotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, we enrolled 71 consecutive patients who received nivolumab monotherapy for unresectable or recurrent gastric cancer. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to determine the cutoff values of systemic inflammation-related variables, predictors of treatment response, and other prognostic factors related to nivolumab therapy. We focused on systemic inflammation-related variables measured before nivolumab induction and 2 weeks after its first administration and performed multivariate analysis to assess whether they could be used as prognostic factors.

RESULTS

Multivariate analysis revealed that a lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) of ≤3.28 after 2 weeks of initial nivolumab treatment (2wLMR) is a statistically significant predictor of treatment response (p = 0.012). The progression-free survival (PFS) rate of patients with liver metastasis was significantly worse than that of the other patients (1-year PFS: 0.0 vs. 24.4%, respectively; p = 0.005). The overall survival (OS) of patients with a low 2wLMR was significantly longer than that in patients with a high 2wLMR (1-year OS: 37.4 vs. 18.9%, respectively; p = 0.022).

CONCLUSIONS

Thus, the 2wLMR could be a useful biomarker to predict response to nivolumab treatment and the prognosis of unresectable and recurrent gastric cancer.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Associated Pneumonitis in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Current Understanding in Characteristics, Diagnosis, and Management

Immunotherapy that includes programmed cell death-1 (PD-1), programmed cell death- ligand 1 (PD-L1) and cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4) inhibitors has revolutionized the therapeutic strategy in multiple malignancies. Although it has achieved significant breakthrough in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients, immune-related adverse events (irAEs) including checkpoint inhibitor pneumonitis (CIP), are widely reported. As the particularly worrisome and potentially lethal form of irAEs, CIP should be attached more importance. Especially in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, the features of CIP may be more complicated on account of the overlapping respiratory signs compromised by primary tumor following immunotherapy. Herein, we included the previous relevant reports and comprehensively summarized the characteristics, diagnosis, and management of CIP. We also discussed the future direction of optimal steroid therapeutic schedule for patients with CIP in NSCLC based on the current evidence.

Prognostic factors in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer after long-term Anti-PD-1 therapy (HOT1902)

OBJECTIVES

Limited information is available on the appropriate treatment duration of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). We aimed to identify candidates who would benefit from ICI discontinuation after one year of treatment for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective multi-institutional observational study examined medical records of all consecutive patients with advanced or recurrent NSCLC, who started ICI monotherapy at 15 institutions in Japan between December 2015 and December 2017. Patients who received initial ICI therapy for >1 year without progressive disease were defined as the long-term treatment (LT) group; others were defined as the non-long-term treatment (NLT) group. Primary outcomes included the prognostic factors in the LT group, whereas secondary outcomes included efficacy of ICI rechallenge, safety, and survival outcomes in the overall population.

RESULTS

In total, 676 patients were enrolled, and 114 (16.9 %) were assigned to the LT group. The median time interval from the start of initial ICI administration to data cutoff was 34.3 months (range, 24.1-47.8); thus, all surviving patients were followed-up for at least 2 years from the start of initial ICI. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was longer in the LT than in the NLT group (33.6 months vs. 2.7 months; p < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, significantly better PFS was associated with smoking (hazard ratio [HR]=0.36, p = 0.04), and complete response (CR; HR=uncomputable, p < 0.001) in the LT group. Thirty-seven patients (5.5 %) received ICI rechallenge, including 10 in the LT group. Among patients receiving rechallenge treatment, the median PFS was 2.2 months, with no difference between the LT and NLT groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In the LT group, smoking and achieving CR were significantly associated with better PFS. Since rechallenge treatment was not effective, careful consideration is required for discontinuing ICI. However, these prognostic factors are helpful in considering candidates for ICI discontinuation.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

UMIN ID, UMIN000041403.

Prognostic Value of Pretreatment Lymphocyte-to-Monocyte Ratio in Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

The overall prognosis of lung cancer remains unfavorable and novel prognostic biomarkers of lung cancer are needed warranted. Accumulating evidence indicate that systemic inflammation plays a vital role in lung cancer. The lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) is biomarker that reflects the level of systemic inflammation.

OBJECTIVE

To perform a comprehensive meta-analysis exploring the correlation of pretreatment LMR with the overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of lung cancer patients.

METHODS

We conducted searches of the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases to May 2020 to identify relevant studies and calculated combined hazard ratios (HRs) to evaluate the association between pretreatment LMR and survival time in patients with lung cancer.

RESULTS

A total of 23 studies comprising 8361 lung cancer patients were included. Among the patients, 5702 (68%) were males, 4548 were current smokers and 2212 were diagnosed with squamous carcinoma. The pooled analysis revealed that decreased pretreatment LMR was significantly correlated with reduced of PFS (HR = 1.49, 95% CI: 1.34-1.67, p < 0.01) and reduced OS (HR = 1.61, 95% CI: 1.45-1.79, p < 0.01) among lung cancer patients. Furthermore, in the subgroup analyses according to histologic type, a lower level of pretreatment LMR seemed to be unrelated to the poorer OS of small cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients (HR = 1.21, 95%CI: 0.87-1.67, P = 0.25).

CONCLUSIONS

Decreased pretreatment LMR in peripheral blood was associated with shorter OS and PFS in lung cancer patients, suggesting its potential prognostic value.

Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma from Transplanted Kidney with Complete Response to an Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor

Background

Donor-derived malignancy is a rare complication in patients who undergo organ transplant. Approaches to treatment have largely been individualized based on clinical circumstances given the lack of evidence-based guidelines, with therapeutic options ranging from discontinuation of immunosuppression and transplantectomy to the addition of chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Case Presentation. Herein, we describe a 60-year-old woman with metastatic donor-derived upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) discovered nine years postrenal transplant. Molecular diagnostic studies using polymerase chain reaction amplification of short tandem repeat alleles and HLA tissue typing proved that the urothelial carcinoma originated from donor tissue. She achieved sustained complete remission with transplant nephroureterectomy, retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy, immunosuppression withdrawal, and immunotherapy with pembrolizumab. Routine radiologic surveillance has demonstrated 15-month progression-free survival to date off pembrolizumab, and she is now under consideration for retransplantation.

Conclusions

Immunotherapy using checkpoint inhibitors can serve as a novel treatment option for patients in the clinical predicament of having a solid organ transplant and simultaneous metastatic malignancy. In this report, we also discuss the oncogenic potential of BK virus, the use of checkpoint inhibitors in urothelial carcinoma, and the feasibility of retransplant for this patient population.

Pembrolizumab rechallenge in squamous non-small-cell lung cancer and HIV-positivity: a case report

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) changed management of non-small-cell lung cancer, but resistance usually develops. Today, at ICIs failure, chemotherapy is the treatment of choice, but the chance of immunotherapy rechallenge is appealing. Another challenging issue is whether it is safe to treat HIV-positive patients with ICIs: safety and efficacy of immunotherapy have been marginally considered in this subgroup. We report the case of a non-small-cell lung cancer patient treated by PD-1 inhibitors rechallenge despite his HIV-positivity, achieving good partial response with significant clinical benefit and without toxicities. Our experience underlines that HIV-positive patients can be treated similarly to HIV-negative individuals. HIV-positivity should be considered similar to other comorbidities, and not as a sufficient reason to preclude them the best available treatments.

Outcomes following immunotherapy re-challenge after immune-related adverse event: systematic review and meta-analysis

Background: Given the inconclusive evidence behind the safety and efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors re-challenge, herein, we have conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to synthesize available data. Results/methodology: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Database, and ASCO and ESMO were searched for studies published from conception to March 2020. Pooled incidence of recurrent immune-related adverse events (irAEs), objective response rates, and odds ratios for irAEs at initial versus re-treatment were calculated. Overall, 437 patients (ten studies) were included. Incidence of any grade, grade 3/4, and steroid-requiring recurrent irAEs were 47%, 13.2%, and 26% respectively. Objective response rate in previous non-responders was 12.5% (5.8–24.8%). Odds ratio for severe irAEs was 0.28 (0.11–0.72) and steroid-requiring irAEs 0.19 (0.06–0.56). Discussion/conclusion: This analysis suggests that immune checkpoint inhibitors re-challenge is safe and potentially efficacious.

Obesity, Sarcopenia, and Outcomes in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Treated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors

Body composition refers to the proportional content of body fat mass and lean body mass that can lead to a continuum of different phenotypes ranging from cachectic/sarcopenic state to obesity. The heterogenetic phenotypes of body composition can contribute to formation of some cancer types and can sometimes lead to disparate outcomes. Both of these extremes of the spectrum exist in patients with non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). The discovery of new pathways that drive tumorigenesis contributing to cancer progression and resistance have expanded our understanding of cancer biology leading to development of new targeted therapies including tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) that have changed the landscape of NSCLC treatment. However, in the new era of precision medicine, the impact of body composition phenotypes on treatment outcomes and survival is now being elucidated. In this review, we will discuss the emerging evidence of a link between body composition and outcomes in patients with NSCLC treated with TKI and ICI. We will also discuss suggested mechanisms by which body composition can impact tumor behavior and anti-tumor immunological response.

Overcoming immunotherapy resistance in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) - novel approaches and future outlook

Immunotherapy (IO) has revolutionized the therapy landscape of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), significantly prolonging the overall survival (OS) of advanced stage patients. Over the recent years IO therapy has been broadly integrated into the first-line setting of non-oncogene driven NSCLC, either in combination with chemotherapy, or in selected patients with PD-L1high expression as monotherapy. Still, a significant proportion of patients suffer from disease progression. A better understanding of resistance mechanisms depicts a central goal to avoid or overcome IO resistance and to improve patient outcome.We here review major cellular and molecular pathways within the tumor microenvironment (TME) that may impact the evolution of IO resistance. We summarize upcoming treatment options after IO resistance including novel IO targets (e.g. RIG-I, STING) as well as interesting combinational approaches such as IO combined with anti-angiogenic agents or metabolic targets (e.g. IDO-1, adenosine signaling, arginase). By discussing the fundamental mode of action of IO within the TME, we aim to understand and manage IO resistance and to seed new ideas for effective therapeutic IO concepts.

Pretreatment body mass index and clinical outcomes in cancer patients following immune checkpoint inhibitors: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the association between pretreatment body mass index (BMI) and clinical outcomes in cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs).

METHODS

Systematical searches of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases were carried out. Studies reporting on the association between BMI and outcomes of ICIs were included. The intended outcomes included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR) and immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Quantitative analyses and dose-response meta-analyses were performed under random effect models.

RESULTS

Twenty-two eligible studies involving 5686 cancer patients treated with ICIs were identified. Compared to those with lower BMI, patients with higher BMI obtained a significant benefit on OS (HR = 0.698, 95% CI 0.614-0.794, P < 0.001; I² = 45.9%) and PFS (HR = 0.760, 95% CI 0.672-0.861, P < 0.001; I² = 37.9%). Most stratified analyses for OS and PFS also showed similar pooled risk estimates. For an increment of every 5 kg/m² in BMI, the risk for death reduced by approximately 15.6% (HR = 0.844, 95% CI 0.752-0.945, P = 0.003). Moreover, patients with higher BMI had a remarkably better ORR (OR = 0.468, 95% CI 0.263-0.833, P = 0.010; I² = 73.6%) than that of those with lower BMI. However, no statistically significant differences were found in the incidence of any grade irAEs (P = 0.073) and ≥ 3 grade irAEs (P = 0.105) between higher and lower BMI.

CONCLUSION

Higher BMI is significantly associated with improved outcomes in patients treated with ICIs. Further large-scale prospective research is warranted to better illuminate the association between BMI and outcomes from ICIs.

Switching administration of anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 antibodies as immune checkpoint inhibitor rechallenge in individuals with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: Case series and literature review

BACKGROUND

Based on several phase III studies, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are essential and promising drugs for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, in patients previously treated with ICI, the efficacy and safety of rechallenging the same or another type of ICI inhibitor remain unclear. Moreover, clinical data about the efficacy of switching the administration of anti-programmed death-1 (PD-1) antibodies (e.g. nivolumab, pembrolizumab) and anti-programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) antibodies (e.g. atezolizumab) as ICI rechallenge are limited. Thus, the current study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of such treatment strategy in NSCLC patients.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 17 patients with advanced or recurrent NSCLC who received both anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 antibodies during their clinical courses.

RESULTS

Among the 17 patients, one (5.9%) and nine (52.9%) achieved partial response and stable disease, respectively, after ICI rechallenge. The median progression-free survival of ICI rechallenge in these patients was 4.0 (range: 0.4-8.0) months, and the median overall survival from the start of the initial ICI was 31.0 (range: 7.6-46.8) months. Of the 10 patients who developed immune-related adverse events (irAEs) during the first ICI treatment, five presented with these events after the readministration of ICI. Among them, four experienced relapsed irAEs and two patients had pneumonitis, which is a grade 3 or higher irAE. Almost all irAEs during the rechallenge treatment were manageable.

CONCLUSIONS

Switching the administration of anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 antibodies as ICI rechallenge could be a treatment option for some NSCLC patients.

KEY POINTS

• Significant findings of the study In this study, switching the administration of anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 antibodies as ICI rechallenge could be an effective and safe treatment option for some patients with advanced or recurrent NSCLC. • What this study adds Switching the administration of ICI may increase the efficacy of readministration. However, the mechanism is unknown. Thus, further accumulation of cases is required, and extensive investigations must be conducted to elucidate the mechanism and benefits of such treatment.