Which Child with Asthma is a Candidate for Biological Therapies?

The Evolution of Scientific Knowledge in Childhood Asthma over Time: A Surprising History

Asthma is a disease that has been described since the times of Hammurabi. However, it is only since the 1960s that effective therapeutic strategies have been available. Pathogenic mechanisms underlying the disease have been deeply studied, contributing to creating a "patient-specific asthma" definition. Biological drugs have been approved over the last twenty years, improving disease management in patients with severe asthma via a "precision medicine-driven approach". This article aims to describe the evolution of scientific knowledge in childhood asthma, focusing on the most recent biological therapies and their indications for patients with severe asthma.

Severe Asthma and Biological Therapies: Now and the Future

Recognition of phenotypic variability in pediatric asthma allows for a more personalized therapeutic approach. Knowledge of the underlying pathophysiological and molecular mechanisms (endotypes) of corresponding biomarkers and new treatments enables this strategy to progress. Biologic therapies for children with severe asthma are becoming more relevant in this sense. The T2 phenotype is the most prevalent in childhood and adolescence, and non-T2 phenotypes are usually rare. This document aims to review the mechanism of action, efficacy, and potential predictive and monitoring biomarkers of biological drugs, focusing on the pediatric population. The drugs currently available are omalizumab, mepolizumab, benralizumab, dupilumab, and 1ezepelumab, with some differences in administrative approval prescription criteria between the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA). Previously, we described the characteristics of severe asthma in children and its diagnostic and therapeutic management.

Biologic Therapies for Moderate to Severe Asthma in the Pediatric Population: A Practice Update

Introduction

Asthma is a common childhood condition. Up until recent years, the mainstay of long-term control treatment has been inhaled corticosteroids. While inhaled corticosteroids are very effective for most children with asthma, with the introduction of biologic therapies, additional options now exist for children with uncontrolled moderate to severe asthma.

Purpose

The purpose of this Practice Update is to provide nursing professionals with a summary of the biologic therapies currently available for the pediatric population and, to describe when they are indicated for inclusion in the plan of care for children with moderate to severe asthma.

Conclusion

By properly diagnosing asthma, and, selecting and administering appropriate asthma therapies, nursing professionals can help children with moderate to severe asthma lead healthy and active lives.

Severe asthma in children: An official statement from Saudi Pediatric Pulmonology Association

In Saudi Arabia, the prevalence of pediatric asthma ranges between 8% and 25%. However, there are no sufficient data regarding severe asthma in childhood in Saudi Arabia. Therefore, a task force has been formed by the Saudi Pediatric Pulmonology Association which is a subsidiary group of the Saudi Thoracic Society and consists of Saudi experts with well-respected academic and clinical backgrounds in the fields of pediatric asthma as well as other respiratory diseases to write a consensus on definitions, phenotypes, and pathophysiology, evaluation, and management. To achieve this, the subject was divided into various sections, each of which was assigned to at least 2 experts. Without a central literature review, the authors searched the literature using their own strategies. To reach an agreement, the entire panel reviewed and voted on proposed findings and recommendations.

Allergen Management in Children with Type 2-High Asthma

Children exposed to various indoor and outdoor allergens are placed at an increased risk of developing asthma in later life, with sensitization in these individuals being a strong predictor of disease morbidity. In addition, aeroallergen exposure influences asthma outcomes through an interplay with adverse determinants of health. The goal of this review is to provide an introductory overview of factors related to aeroallergen exposure in type 2-high childhood asthma. These include the relevance of exposure in asthma exacerbations and severity, and the evidence-base for avoidance and treatment for sensitization to these allergens. This review will focus on both indoor aeroallergens (house dust mite, pet, cockroach, mold, and rodent) and outdoor aeroallergens (pollens and molds). Treatment of aeroallergen sensitization in children with asthma includes avoidance and removal measures, although there is limited evidence of clinical benefit especially with single-strategy approaches. We will also address the interplay of aeroallergens and climate change, adverse social determinants, and the current COVID-19 pandemic, when we have seen a dramatic reduction in asthma exacerbations and emergency department visits among children. While there are many factors that are hypothesized to contribute to this reduction, among them is a reduced exposure to outdoor seasonal aeroallergens.

Multidisciplinary management in type 2 inflammatory disease

Greater understanding of molecular pathophysiology has led to the recognition that an excessive type 2 inflammatory response is at the basis of the pathophysiology of several inflammatory diseases including atopic dermatitis (AD), asthma, and chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). Given the availability of biological agents that can permit management of specific disease endotypes, this reinforces the need for detailed characterization of these diseases through a multidisciplinary approach. Herein, these three conditions are briefly overviewed and practical guidance for a multidisciplinary approach to management is presented. Since type 2 inflammation is suppressed by steroids, drugs such as glucocorticoids have long been the workhorse of medical therapy. However, steroids have well-known local and systemic adverse effects, especially when used at high doses over prolonged periods of time, which is problematic when treating chronic diseases such as AD, asthma, and CRSwNP. Moreover, a substantial proportion of patients remain refractive to therapy. In the attempt to overcome these limitations, greater understanding of the molecular mechanisms of type 2 inflammation have led to the development of targeted biological drugs such as dupilumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody that targets the α chain of the IL-4 receptor. Dupilumab represents a unique therapy for type 2 inflammatory diseases and to date is the only therapy approved for AD, asthma, and CRSwNP. In terms of multidisciplinary management of type 2 inflammatory conditions, the main healthcare professionals involved include a dermatologist, pneumologist or allergologist, and ENT specialist. The model proposed herein takes into account the complex management of patients with type 2 inflammatory conditions and the new biological agents available. A multidisciplinary team can provide a central point for patient management, improve outcomes and specialist referrals, reduce costs, and guarantee that the most appropriate therapeutic decisions are made, as well as aid in management of adverse events. The multidisciplinary model should be structured and dedicated, but at the same time simple and flexible in order to not risk slowing down the patient's care. At present, it is believed that a structured multidisciplinary approach is currently the best means to optimize care of patients with type 2 inflammatory conditions.

Severe acute asthma at the pediatric intensive care unit: can we link the clinical phenotypes to immunological endotypes?

INTRODUCTION

The clinical phenotype of severe acute asthma at the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) is highly heterogeneous. However, current treatment is still based on a 'one-size-fits-all approach'.

AREAS COVERED

We aim to give a comprehensive description of the clinical characteristics of pediatric patients with severe acute asthma admitted to the PICU and available immunological biomarkers, providing the first steps toward precision medicine for this patient population. A literature search was performed using PubMed for relevant studies on severe acute (pediatric) asthma.

EXPERT OPINION

Omics technologies should be used to investigate the relationship between cellular molecules and pathways, and their clinical phenotypes. Inflammatory phenotypes might guide bedside decisions regarding the use of corticosteroids, neutrophil modifiers and/or type of beta-agonist. A next step toward precision medicine should be inclusion of these patients in clinical trials on biologics.

Biologic Use in Allergic and Asthmatic Children and Adolescents During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Background: Biologics are the cornerstone of therapy in children and adolescents with severe or uncontrolled allergic diseases, such as asthma, atopic dermatitis, and chronic urticaria. Since the World Health Organization (WHO) declared severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection a pandemic in March 2020, some scientific societies have released statements on the use of biologics in allergic children and adolescents. Materials and Methods: Given the very limited data in Italy on use of biological therapies in allergic children and adolescents during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, a multicenter observational nationwide survey was conducted to collect this information. The 11-question survey was designed to determine (1) the number of allergic children and adolescents treated with omalizumab, mepolizumab, or dupilumab for asthma, atopic dermatitis, and chronic urticaria; (2) the number of these patients who developed COVID-19; and (3) severity of COVID-19 symptoms. Twenty pediatric centers participated, and data were collected from February to April 2020. Results: Three hundred eight children and adolescents (mean age 12.8 years, 161 males) were treated with biologics. Only 3 subjects (1%) who had been treated with omalizumab experienced paucisymptomatic COVID-19, but those symptoms promptly resolved. Of the 9 patients treated with mepolizumab, none had COVID-19 or asthma exacerbations. Of the 6 asthmatic subjects and 7 patients with chronic urticaria treated with dupilumab, none had COVID-19. Also, there was no worsening of the underlying disease. Conclusion: These very preliminary outcomes suggest that continuing biologics seem to be safe. Therefore, biologics could be continued in patients with severe allergic diseases, but withheld once contracted COVID-19.