Serum and Synovial Markers in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis and Periprosthetic Joint Infection

The predictive value and reliability of ultrasound-guided synovial aspiration and biopsies for diagnosing periprosthetic shoulder infections

INTRODUCTION

Preoperative diagnosis of periprosthetic shoulder infections (PSI) is difficult. Infections are mostly caused by low virulence bacteria and patients do not show typical signs of infection. The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic value and reliability of ultrasound-guided biopsies for cultures alone and in combination with multiplex polymerase chain reaction (mPCR), serum markers, and/or synovial markers for the preoperative diagnosis of PSI in patients undergoing revision shoulder surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A prospective explorative diagnostic cohort study was performed including 55 patients undergoing revision shoulder replacement surgery. A shoulder puncture was performed preoperatively before incision to collect synovial fluid for mPCR analysis and for measurement of interleukin-6, calprotectin, white blood cell count (WBC), and polymorphonuclear cells. Also prior to revision surgery, six ultrasound-guided synovial tissue biopsies were collected for culture and two for mPCR analysis. A blood sample was obtained to determine serum C-reactive protein, WBC, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate. Six routine care tissue biopsies were taken during revision surgery and served as reference standard. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV; the primary outcome measure), and accuracy were calculated for ultrasound-guided biopsies, blood and synovial markers, mPCR, and combinations thereof.

RESULTS

Routine tissue cultures were positive for infection in 24 patients. Cultures from ultrasound-guided biopsies diagnosed infection in 7 of these patients, yielding a sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy of 29.2%, 93.5%, 77.8%, 63.0%, and 65.6%, respectively. The best diagnostic value was found for the combination of ultrasound-guided biopsies for culture, synovial WBC, and calprotectin with a sensitivity of 69.2%, specificity of 80.0%, PPV of 69.2%, and NPV of 80.0%.

CONCLUSION

Ultrasound-guided biopsies for cultures alone and in combination with mPCR, and/or blood and/or synovial markers are not reliable enough to use in clinical practice for the preoperative diagnosis of PSI.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnostic study level II.

Diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infections in patients who have rheumatoid arthritis

Aims

To investigate the optimal thresholds and diagnostic efficacy of commonly used serological and synovial fluid detection indexes for diagnosing periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in patients who have rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

Methods

The data from 348 patients who had RA or osteoarthritis (OA) and had previously undergone a total knee (TKA) and/or a total hip arthroplasty (THA) (including RA-PJI: 60 cases, RA-non-PJI: 80 cases; OA-PJI: 104 cases, OA-non-PJI: 104 cases) were retrospectively analyzed. A receiver operating characteristic curve was used to determine the optimal thresholds of the CRP, ESR, synovial fluid white blood cell count (WBC), and polymorphonuclear neutrophil percentage (PMN%) for diagnosing RA-PJI and OA-PJI. The diagnostic efficacy was evaluated by comparing the area under the curve (AUC) of each index and applying the results of the combined index diagnostic test.

Results

For PJI prediction, the results of serological and synovial fluid indexes were different between the RA-PJI and OA-PJI groups. The optimal cutoff value of CRP for diagnosing RA-PJI was 12.5 mg/l, ESR was 39 mm/hour, synovial fluid WBC was 3,654/μl, and PMN% was 65.9%; and those of OA-PJI were 8.2 mg/l, 31 mm/hour, 2,673/μl, and 62.0%, respectively. In the RA-PJI group, the specificity (94.4%), positive predictive value (97.1%), and AUC (0.916) of synovial fluid WBC were higher than those of the other indexes. The optimal cutoff values of synovial fluid WBC and PMN% for diagnosing RA-PJI after THA were significantly higher than those of TKA. The specificity and positive predictive value of the combined index were 100%.

Conclusion

Serum inflammatory and synovial fluid indexes can be used for diagnosing RA-PJI, for which synovial fluid WBC is the best detection index. Combining multiple detection indexes can provide a reference basis for the early and accurate diagnosis of RA-PJI.

Profiling the Immune Response to Periprosthetic Joint Infection and Non-Infectious Arthroplasty Failure

Arthroplasty failure is a major complication of joint replacement surgery. It can be caused by periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) or non-infectious etiologies, and often requires surgical intervention and (in select scenarios) resection and reimplantation of implanted devices. Fast and accurate diagnosis of PJI and non-infectious arthroplasty failure (NIAF) is critical to direct medical and surgical treatment; differentiation of PJI from NIAF may, however, be unclear in some cases. Traditional culture, nucleic acid amplification tests, metagenomic, and metatranscriptomic techniques for microbial detection have had success in differentiating the two entities, although microbiologically negative apparent PJI remains a challenge. Single host biomarkers or, alternatively, more advanced immune response profiling-based approaches may be applied to differentiate PJI from NIAF, overcoming limitations of microbial-based detection methods and possibly, especially with newer approaches, augmenting them. In this review, current approaches to arthroplasty failure diagnosis are briefly overviewed, followed by a review of host-based approaches for differentiation of PJI from NIAF, including exciting futuristic combinational multi-omics methodologies that may both detect pathogens and assess biological responses, illuminating causes of arthroplasty failure.

Inflammation of Bone in Patients with Periprosthetic Joint Infections of the Knee

Despite the general success of total knee arthroplasty (TKA), addressing periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) and the resulting long-term complications is a growing medical need given the aging population and the increasing demand for arthroplasty. A larger proportion of patients face revision surgery because of the long-term complication of aseptic loosening despite clearance of the infection. The pathomechanisms leading to prosthetic loosening are not understood as it has been widely assumed that the bone stock recovers after explantation revision surgery. While clinical observations suggest a reduced osteogenic potential in patients with PJI, knowledge regarding the relevant biology is sparse. In the present study, we investigated the inflammatory impact of PJI on the bone and bone marrow in the vicinity of the joint. Additionally, we evaluated changes in the local inflammatory environment in a 2-stage exchange at both explantation and reimplantation.

Methods

In this study, we analyzed 75 human bone and bone-marrow specimens (obtained from 65 patients undergoing revision arthroplasty with cement for the treatment of PJI) for markers of inflammation. Samples were analyzed using hematoxylin and eosin overview staining, fluorescent immunohistochemical staining, flow cytometry, and polymerase chain reaction (PCR).

Results

Leukocyte prevalence was significantly elevated at explantation (femur, +218.9%; tibia, +134.2%). While leukocyte prevalence decreased at reimplantation (femur, -49.5%; tibia, -34.2%), the number of cells remained significantly higher compared with the control group (femur, +61.2%; tibia, +54.2%). Expression of inflammatory markers interleukin (IL)-1α (femur, +2,748.7%; tibia, +1,605.9%), IL-6 (femur, +2,062.5%; tibia, +2,385.7%), IL-10 (femur, +913.7%; tibia, +897.5%), IL-12 (femur, +386.1%; tibia, +52.5%), IL-18 (femur, +805.3%; tibia, +547.7%), and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α (femur, +296.9%; tibia, +220.9%) was significantly elevated at prosthesis explantation in both femoral and tibial specimens. Expression remained significantly elevated at reimplantation for all inflammatory markers except IL-12 compared with the control group. Conversely, there were only limited inflammatory changes in the bone marrow environment.

Conclusions

The present study demonstrated a strong and lasting upregulation of the proinflammatory environment in the joint-surrounding osseous scaffold in patients with PJI. Our data suggest that modulating the inflammatory environment has substantial potential to improve the clinical outcome in affected patients.