|
1
|
Fotouh AA, Hamdy M, Ali F, Mohamed EF, Allam A, Hassan WA, Elsaman A, El-Najjar A, Amer MA, Mosad D, Tharwat S, El Bakry SA, Saleh H, Zaghloul A, Mahmoud M, Mohammed RHA, El-Saadany H, Fathi HM, Hammam N, Raafat HA, Moharram AN, Gheita TA. The Emerging Era of Interventional Imaging in Rheumatology: An Overview During the Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic. Open Access Rheumatol 2022; 14:43-56. [PMID: 35449707 PMCID: PMC9018128 DOI: 10.2147/oarrr.s355140] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2021] [Accepted: 03/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Imaging has long been taking its place in the diagnosis, monitor, and prognosis of rheumatic diseases. It plays a vital role in the appraisal of treatment. Key progress in the clinical practice of rheumatology is the innovation of advanced imaging modalities; such as musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSUS), computerized tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). These modalities introduced a promising noninvasive method for visualizing bone and soft tissues to enable an improved diagnosis. The use of MSUS in rheumatology is considered a landmark in the evolution of the specialty and its ease of use and many applications in rheumatic diseases make it a forerunner instrument in the practice. The use of MSUS among rheumatologists must parallel the development rate of the excellence revealed in the specialty. Moreover, innovative interventional imaging in rheumatology (III-R) is gaining fame and key roles in the near future for a comprehensive management of rheumatic diseases with precision. This review article throws light on the emergence of these robust innovations that may reshape the guidelines and practice in rheumatology, in particular, efforts to enhance best practice during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic are endorsed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Mona Hamdy
- Rheumatology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Minia University, Minia, Egypt
| | - Fatma Ali
- Rheumatology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Minia University, Minia, Egypt
| | - Eman F Mohamed
- Internal Medicine Department, Rheumatology Unit, Faculty of Medicine, AlAzhar Girls, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Abdallah Allam
- Rheumatology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt
| | - Waleed A Hassan
- Rheumatology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Benha University, Banha, Egypt
| | - Ahmed Elsaman
- Rheumatology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Sohag University, Sohag, Egypt
| | - Amany El-Najjar
- Rheumatology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt
| | - Marwa A Amer
- Rheumatology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt
| | - Doaa Mosad
- Rheumatology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
| | - Samar Tharwat
- Internal Medicine Department, Rheumatology Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
| | - Samah A El Bakry
- Internal Medicine Department, Rheumatology Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Hanan Saleh
- Rheumatology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Ahmed Zaghloul
- Interventional Pain Management and Anesthesia, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Mostafa Mahmoud
- Orthopedic and Microsurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Reem H A Mohammed
- Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Hanan El-Saadany
- Rheumatology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt
| | - Hanan M Fathi
- Rheumatology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Fayoum University, Fayoum, Egypt
| | - Nevin Hammam
- Rheumatology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt
| | - Hala A Raafat
- Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Ashraf N Moharram
- Orthopedic and Microsurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Tamer A Gheita
- Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
| | | |
Collapse
|
|
2
|
Interobserver Reliability of Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Sacroiliac Joints in Axial Spondyloarthritis. Life (Basel) 2022; 12:life12040470. [PMID: 35454961 PMCID: PMC9032207 DOI: 10.3390/life12040470] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2022] [Revised: 03/18/2022] [Accepted: 03/21/2022] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) is characterized by damage to the axial skeleton and entheses, and is often associated with extra-articular manifestations, in the presence of the human leukocyte antigen (HLA) B27. The aim of our study is to assess the performance of rheumatologists in interpreting the inflammatory and structural damage to sacroiliac joints, in comparison to radiologists. Material and Methods: The present study included a total of 34 patients diagnosed with axSpA, according to the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS) criteria for axSpA, examined from January 2021 to November 2021 in the Departments of Rheumatology and Radiology and Medical Imaging of the University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova. All patients underwent physical examination, laboratory tests, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the sacroiliac joints. The images were interpreted by a senior radiologist (SR), a junior radiologist (JR), a senior rheumatologist (SRh), and a junior rheumatologist (JRh), who were blinded to the clinical and paraclinical data. Results: The overall κ was 0.7 for the JR (substantial agreement), 0.707 for the SRh (substantial agreement), and 0.601 for the JRh (moderate agreement), in comparison with the SR. Regarding the overall inflammatory changes, the SRh and JR were proven to have substantial agreement (κ = 0.708 and 0.742, respectively) with the SR, while the JRh was proven to have moderate agreement (κ = 0.607). The structural damage observed by the JR showed substantial agreement (κ = 0.676) with the SR, while the SRh and JRh had substantial and moderate agreement (κ = 0.705 and 0.596, respectively) with the SR. Conclusions: Our study showed substantial agreement between the senior radiologist, senior rheumatologist, and junior radiologist, and moderate agreement with the junior rheumatologist.
Collapse
|