Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion: An Emerging Option in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation at High Risk of Bleeding

Cardiothoracic Medical Devices - A Pictorial Review

The rapid advancement of medical technology has introduced a plethora of innovative devices designed for use within the thoracic cavity. Familiarity with the characteristic imaging features of these devices, their purpose and desired positioning is crucial for radiologists to identify them promptly and accurately assess any associated complications. This pictorial review provides a comprehensive overview of the radiologic findings associated with various new chest devices, aiming to equip radiologists with the knowledge required for effective clinical management.

Left Atrial Appendage Closure With Catheter Ablation vs. Ablation Alone on Outcomes of Atrial Fibrillation in Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis

Background Combining left atrial appendage closure with catheter ablation (LAACCA) has been proposed as a potential approach to improving outcomes by simultaneously addressing arrhythmia and reducing stroke risk. This study compares the in-hospital outcomes of LAACCA vs. catheter ablation (CA) alone for atrial fibrillation (AFib) in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Methods We analyzed adult hospitalizations with HFrEF and AFib who underwent LAACCA or CA alone from the 2016-2020 nationwide inpatient sample using validated ICD-10 codes. Propensity score matching, accounting for patient-, hospital-, and procedure-level covariates, illness severity, and baseline risk of mortality, was used to alleviate bias in nonrandomized treatment assignments. The primary endpoints included all-cause in-hospital mortality, hospital stay, and hospitalization costs. Secondary endpoints included postprocedural complication rates. Prolonged hospitalization was defined as hospital stay in the top decile of hospital stay in each cohort. All statistical analyses in the study were based on weighted hospital data. Results About 233,865 HFrEF patients were hospitalized for AFib. Approximately 27,945 (11.9%) underwent LAACCA, while 205,920 (88.1%) underwent CA only. The cohort comprised mostly males (151,077; 64.6%) (mean age: 67.4; SD: 4.3). The propensity score-matched cohort comprised 18,195 LAACCAs and 18,195 CAs; all covariate imbalances were alleviated. LAACCA was associated with a higher rate of prolonged hospital stay (7.6 vs 5.6 days; P<0.001), a higher mortality rate (209 (1.1%) vs. 160 (0.9%); P=0.011), and higher mean hospital costs ($289,960 vs. $183,932; P<0.001) compared with CA alone. LAACCA was associated with a higher incidence of acute myocardial ischemia (528 (2.9%) vs. 455 (2.5%); P=0.013), complete atrioventricular block (1,200 (6.6%) vs. 892 (4.9%); P=0.004), need for implantable device therapy (1,510 (8.3%) vs. 1,348 (7.4%); P=0.017), pneumothorax (328 (1.8%) vs. 91 (0.5%); P<0.0001), hemothorax (200 (1.1%) vs. 127 (0.7%); P<0.0001), pneumonia (983 (5.4%) vs. 546 (3.0%); P<0.0001), vascular access complications (346 (1.9%) vs. 255 (1.4%); P=0.046), and septicemia (309 (1.7%) vs. 182 (1.0%); P<0.001). CA was associated with a greater incidence of cardiac tamponade (237 (1.3%) vs. 382 (2.1%); P=0.010) and femoral artery pseudoaneurysm (364 (0.2%) vs. 91 (0.5%); P<0.001). Conclusion LAACCA was correlated with higher mortality odds compared to CA alone for atrial fibrillation in HFrEF.

Novel Anticoagulants for Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation: A Comprehensive Review

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a prevalent cardiac arrhythmia associated with an increased risk of stroke due to disrupted heart function and potential clot formation. This review examines current management strategies for stroke prevention in AF, focusing on the efficacy, safety, and long-term outcomes of anticoagulation therapies. Anticoagulants, including novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) and vitamin K antagonists, play a crucial role in reducing stroke risk by preventing clot formation in the heart. Recent studies highlight NOACs as superior alternatives to traditional therapies, offering improved safety profiles and enhanced patient adherence. Despite the risk of bleeding complications, judicious use of anticoagulants significantly improves clinical outcomes in AF patients. The review synthesizes evidence from clinical trials and meta-analyses to underscore the pivotal role of NOACs in transforming stroke prevention strategies in AF. Moreover, it discusses emerging interventions such as left atrial appendage occlusion and emphasizes the importance of personalized, patient-centered care in optimizing treatment decisions for AF patients at risk of stroke.

DAPT Is Comparable to OAC Following LAAC With WATCHMAN FLX: A National Registry Analysis

BACKGROUND

Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) is an approved alternative for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation for patients with an "appropriate rationale" to avoid long-term oral anticoagulation (OAC). Many patients undergoing LAAO are at high risk of bleeding.

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to investigate whether dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is a safe alternative to OAC (direct oral anticoagulation [DOAC] or warfarin) with aspirin after LAAO.

METHODS

Using National Cardiovascular Data Registry LAAO registry data, patients undergoing Watchman FLX (Boston Scientific) implantation (August 5, 2020-September 30, 2021) were included in 1:1 propensity-matched analyses comparing discharge medication regimens (DAPT, DOAC/aspirin, or warfarin/aspirin). A composite endpoint (death, stroke, major bleeding, and systemic embolism), its components, and device-related thrombus between discharge and 45 days were evaluated.

RESULTS

In 49,968 patients implanted with the Watchman FLX during the study period, the mean age was 77 years, and 40% were women. Postimplant DOAC/aspirin was prescribed in 24,497 patients, warfarin/aspirin in 3,913, and DAPT in 4,155. DAPT patients had more comorbid conditions than patients receiving OAC/aspirin. After propensity score matching, the 45-day composite endpoint rates were similar among the groups (DAPT = 3.44% vs DOAC/aspirin: 4.06%; P = 0.13 and DAPT = 3.23% vs warfarin/aspirin: 3.08%; P = 0.75). Death, stroke, and device-related thrombus were also similar; major bleeding was slightly increased in DOAC/aspirin patients (DAPT = 2.48% vs DOAC/aspirin = 3.25%; P = 0.04 and DAPT = 2.25% vs warfarin/aspirin = 2.22%; P = 0.93).

CONCLUSIONS

In a large registry, DAPT had a similar safety profile compared with current Food and Drug Administration-approved postimplant drug regimens of OAC with aspirin following LAAO with the Watchman FLX. Shared decision making for nonpharmacologic stroke prevention should include a discussion of postprocedure medical therapy options.

Effectiveness and safety of edoxaban versus warfarin in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most prevalent cardiac arrhythmia type. Patients with AF are often administered anticoagulants to reduce the risk of ischemic stroke due to an irregular heartbeat. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of edoxaban versus warfarin in patients with nonvalvular AF by conducting an updated meta-analysis of real-world studies. Methods: In this comprehensive meta-analysis, we searched two databases, PubMed and EMBASE, and included retrospective cohort observational studies that compared edoxaban with warfarin in patients with nonvalvular AF from 1 January 2009, to 30 September 2023. The effectiveness and safety outcomes were ischemic stroke and major bleeding, respectively. In the final analysis, six retrospective observational studies involving 87,236 patients treated with warfarin and 40,933 patients treated with edoxaban were included. To analyze the data, we used a random-effects model to calculate the hazard ratio (HR). Results: Patients treated with edoxaban had a significantly lower risk of ischemic stroke [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.66; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.61-0.70; p < 0.0001] and major bleeding (HR = 0.58; 95% CI = 0.49-0.69; p < 0.0001) than those treated with warfarin. The sensitivity analysis results for ischemic stroke and major bleeding were as follows: HR = 0.66; 95% CI = 0.61-0.70; p < 0.0001 and HR = 0.58; 95% CI = 0.49-0.69; p < 0.0001, respectively. Conclusion: Our findings revealed that edoxaban performed better than warfarin against major bleeding and ischemic stroke.

Short-term antithrombotic strategies after left atrial appendage occlusion: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Background: Percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) has emerged as a stroke prevention strategy in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), and these patients were required to receive antithrombotic therapy post-procedure. However, the optimal antithrombotic strategy after LAAO remains controversial. This study explored the safety and efficacy of different antithrombotic strategies after LAAO through a network comparison method. Methods: We systematically searched the MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases for studies that reported the interested efficacy and safety outcomes (stroke, device-related thrombus (DRT), and major bleeding) of different antithrombotic strategies [DAPT (dual antiplatelet therapy), DOACs (direct oral anticoagulants), and VKA (vitamin k antagonist)] in patients who had experienced LAAO. Pairwise comparisons and network meta-analysis were performed for the interested outcomes. Risk ratios (RRs) with their confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a random-effects model. The rank of the different strategies was calculated using the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA). Results: Finally, 10 observational studies involving 1,674 patients were included. There was no significant difference in stroke, DRT, and major bleeding among the different antithrombotic strategies (DAPT, DOACs, and VKA). Furthermore, DAPT ranked the worst in terms of stroke (SUCRA: 19.8%), DRT (SUCRA: 3.6%), and major bleeding (SUCRA: 6.6%). VKA appeared to be superior to DOACs in terms of stroke (SUCRA: 74.9% vs. 55.3%) and DRT (SUCRA: 82.3% vs. 64.1%) while being slightly inferior to DOACs in terms of major bleeding (SUCRA: 71.0% vs. 72.4%). Conclusion: No significant difference was found among patients receiving DAPT, DOACs, and VKA in terms of stroke, DRT, and major bleeding events after LAAO. The SUCRA indicated that DAPT was ranked the worst among all antithrombotic strategies due to the higher risk of stroke, DRT, and major bleeding events, while VKAs were ranked the preferred antithrombotic strategy. However, DOACs are worthy of consideration due to their advantage of convenience.

Clinical relevance of incomplete device endothelialization after left atrial appendage closure

PURPOSE

This study aimed to assess the incidence, potential risk factors and clinical impact of incomplete device endothelialization(IDE) after left atrial appendage closure (LAAC).

METHODS

A total of 101 consecutive patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF) who underwent successful LAAC and received antithrombotic treatment using a standard regimen were prospectively followed up to 6 months after the procedure. The status of device endothelialization and device-related thrombus (DRT) were evaluated using cardiac computed tomography (CT). Major adverse cardio-cerebral events (MACCE) including all-cause death, heart failure(HF) hospitalization, acute ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack(TIA), peripheral vascular embolism, and major bleeding were recorded.

RESULTS

IDE was detected in 65 (64.4%) patients. Patients with IDE or complete device endothelialization (CDE) did not significantly differ with respect to baseline clinical characteristics and interventional procedure features. Multivariate analysis model revealed that persistent AF, left atrial appendage ostial diameter and left atrial size were independent risk factors for IDE. During 6-month follow-up, the incidence of DRT was 4.6% in patients with IDE and 2.8% in those with CDE, respectively (p > 0.05), and the overall rate of MACCE was non-significantly higher in the IDE group (7.7% vs. 2.8%, p = 0.32).

CONCLUSION

IDE is common after LAAC, especially in patients with persistent AF, higher left atrial appendage ostial diameter and left atrial size. IDE confers an increased risk for DRT, but may be not necessarily associated with thromboembolic events and poor clinical outcome, providing careful monitoring and continued antithrombotic therapy are given.

Numerical study of the risk of thrombosis in the left atrial appendage of chicken wing shape in atrial fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common and life-threatening disease. For the patients with AF, more than 90% of the thrombi are formed in the left atrial appendage (LAA), thrombus dislodgement can cause vascular embolism, making them is becoming a high-risk group for stroke. Therefore, identifying the patients with high risk of thrombosis is crucial for advanced stroke warning. To better investigate the mechanism behind thrombus formation in the LAA, this study reconstructed the 3-D Left Atrium (LA) models of six AF volunteer patients by corresponding Computed Tomography (CT) images. Combine the advantages of Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD), the blood flow field in LA both in AF and sinus heart rate states were studied. The risk of thrombus was evaluated based on the blood viscosity, shear rate thrombus prediction model and Time Average Wall Shear Stress (TAWSS), Oscillatory Shear Index (OSI), and Relative Residence Time (RRT) values. The results showed that the left atrium had lower blood flow velocity and TAWSS values at the LAA in both AF and sinus rhythm, thus the LAA is the most thrombogenic region in the LA. Besides, the RRT value of LAA was generally higher in AF than in sinus rhythm. Therefore, AF carries a higher risk of thrombosis.

Cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation and left atrial appendage occlusion prior to atrial septal defect closure: A case report

BACKGROUND

In patients who suffer from both atrial fibrillation (AF) and atrial septal defect (ASD), cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), sequential left atrial appendage (LAA) occlusion and ASD closure could be a strategy for effective prevention of stroke and right heart failure.

CASE SUMMARY

A 65-year-old man was admitted to our institution due to recurrent episodes of palpitations and shortness of breath for 2 years, which had been worsening over the last 48 h. He had a history of AF, ASD, coronary heart disease with stent implantation and diabetes. Physical and laboratory examinations showed no abnormalities. The score of CHA2DS2VASc was 3, and HAS-BLED was 1. Echocardiography revealed a 25-mm secundum ASD. Pulmonary vein (PV) and LAA anatomy were assessed by cardiac computed tomography. PV mapping with 10-pole Lasso catheter was performed following ablation of all four PVs with complete PVI. Following the cryoballoon PVI, the patient underwent LAA occlusion under transesophageal echocardiographic monitoring. Lastly, a 34-mm JIYI ASD occlude device was implanted. A follow-up transesophageal echocardiography at 3 mo showed proper position of both devices and neither thrombi nor leakage was found.

CONCLUSION

Sequential cryoballoon PVI and LAA occlusion prior to ASD closure can be performed safely in AF patients with ASD.

Fatal Adverse Events of Dabigatran Combined With Aspirin in Elderly Patients: An Analysis Using Data From VigiBase

Introduction: The elderly are vulnerable to cardiovascular diseases and the incidence of atrial fibrillation (AF) and venous thromboembolism (VTE) increases significantly with age. Dabigatran is a commonly used new oral anticoagulant approved by the FDA for stroke prevention in patients with non-valvular AF and VTE treatment and prevention. Aspirin is commonly used as a preventive drug for cardiovascular diseases. AF and coronary heart disease share many risk factors, so these two diseases often coexist and thus dabigatran and aspirin are often combined in those people. The aim of this study was to analyze the clinical characteristics of fatal adverse events of dabigatran combined with aspirin in elderly patients, and to provide references for clinical rational use of drugs.

Materials and Methods: Fatal adverse events related to the combined use of dabigatran and aspirin in elderly patients aged over 75 were extracted from the WHO global database of individual case safety reports (VigiBase). Well-documented reports, vigiGrade completeness score ≥0.80, or with an informative narrative, were analyzed with a focus on the clinical features of the cases.

Results: From 1968 up to January 19, 2020, there were 112 eligible reports in VigiBase from 13 countries, of which 33 were identified as well-documented. Of these 33, 19 were male (58%) and 14 were female (42%), the average age of the patients was 84 (75–95 years), with five cases of extreme weights (&gt;100 kg in one case, &lt;50 kg in four cases). There were 31 cases of death by internal bleeding (mainly 15 of gastrointestinal hemorrhage and 12 of intracranial hemorrhage) and two cases of the sudden death of unknown cause. Medication errors existed in 15 patients. The times to onset (TTO) was provided in 24 cases, ranging from 2 days to 4 years, and in 12 patients occurred within a month. Of the 31 patients with fatal bleeding events, 29 were associated with other factors that increase the risk of bleeding, such as diseases (hypertension, renal impairment, stroke, gastrointestinal related diseases, hypothyroidism, and cancer), drugs (antiplatelets, anticoagulants, thrombolytics, P glycoprotein substrates, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, hormones, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, and acetaminophen) and other factors (low body weights and alcohol consumption), and 21 of these contained two or more risk factors.

Conclusion: The fatal adverse events associated with the combined use of dabigatran and aspirin in elderly patients were mainly serious bleeding events, which often occurred within 1 month. Most of these cases had medication errors and most of the patients had multiple diseases, medications, or other conditions at the same time that increase the risk of bleeding. It is suggested that prescription of dabigatran and aspirin in elderly patients should go along with alertness for medication errors, care for correct dose or control of other bleeding risk factors, and the combined medication time should be as short as possible to minimise serious adverse events.