Smoking and Dental Implants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Adjunctive photochemical therapy for management of inflammatory peri-implant diseases: A systematic review and meta-analysis

This study aimed to systematically review the data on interventions involving adjunctive photochemical therapy in treating peri-implant mucositis (PIM) and peri-implantitis (PI). The electronic search was conducted through six databases in October 2023, seeking studies relying on any kind of adjunctive photochemical therapy in treating inflammatory peri-implant diseases (PIDs). To showcase the effect size, mean differences along with 95% confidence intervals were utilized. Forty-seven studies were deemed eligible for qualitative synthesis, 14 of which were included in the meta-analysis. Low-level light therapy and photodynamic therapy led to enhanced improvements in clinical and radiographic indices, such as bone level (BL), bleeding on probing (BoP), clinical attachment level (CAL), and probing depth (PD), during the 3-month follow-up. However, the differences in efficacy between treatments incorporating adjunctive photochemical therapy and those relying solely on mechanical debridement, considered the gold standard, lessened over extended follow-up periods of 6, 9, and 12 months. Significant differences were observed when comparing the treatment outcomes following adjunctive photochemical therapy between obese and smoker patients with healthy subjects. Incorporating adjunctive photochemical therapy for PID treatment might improve clinical and radiographic parameters in a short-term follow-up of 3 months, but longer-term benefits appear comparable to routine treatments.

Clinical and radiographic outcomes of mini-implant-retained maxillary and mandibular overdentures: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To assess the clinical and radiographic outcomes of overdentures and their retaining dental mini-implants, based on a single-arm systematic literature review.

METHODS

Electronic search was undertaken in three databases, last updated in October 2023, plus manual search of journals. Cumulative implant survival rate (CSR) and the estimated marginal bone loss (MBL) under different follow-up times were calculated.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine studies were included, with 3,787 mini-implants supporting 1,026 overdentures (109 maxilla, 896 mandible) in 1,005 patients, with a mean follow-up of 28.1 ± 19.8 months (min-max 0.3-84.0). 202 mini-implants failed, after a mean of 9.4 ± 11.8 months (7-year CSR 91.4%). The implant survival was lower in the maxilla in comparison to the mandible (p < 0.001), lower for early/delayed-loaded in comparison to immediately-loaded implants (p = 0.005) and lower for 2-mini-implant in comparison to 4-mini-implant-retained mandibular overdenture (p < 0.001; Log-rank test). A high rate of transversal fracture of the prosthesis and wear of the attachment parts was observed. The estimated mean MBL gradually increased from 0.518 (≤ 6 months) to 1.260 mm (58.8-90 months). There was an estimated MBL increase of 0.011 mm per additional month of follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Although presenting a high 7-year CSR, mini-implant-retained overdentures may require frequent maintenance follow-ups, due to the high rate of technical complications. The estimated MBL of mini-implants over 80 months is low.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The ability to anticipate outcomes is an essential part of risk management in clinical practice. The findings reported herein set some recommendations and potential strategies for minimizing failures and complications commonly associated with this mini-implant-retained overdentures.

Long-Term Survival of Implants Placed in Earlier Failed Implant Sites

Dental implant therapy is generally successful. However, when such therapy fails, considerations for implant replacement must be carefully considered. The survivability of implants placed into previously implanted sites must be considered. Appraisal of early implant loss versus late implant loss is important in presurgical planning for implant replacement. This review highlights the factors that can impact the success of implant reimplantation.

The Effect of Patient-associated Factors on Long-Term Survival of Dental Implants

Dental implant therapy has developed over the past half century to have documented successful outcomes in most patients who receive treatment. The long-term survival of dental implants depends upon a variety of factors including patient, surgeon, restorative dentist, and materials-related factors. The impact of patient-associated factors may impact significantly on the success of dental implants including diabetes mellitus, medications, smoking, parafunctional habits, oral hygiene, head and neck radiation, and the use of bisphosphonates, antiangiogenic, and antiresorptive medications.

Impact of smoking on dental implant: A review

Dental implants are the most innovative strategy for substituting a missing tooth. Smoking has been identified as a significant risk factor impacting the success rates of dental implants. This study explores the correlation between tobacco use and implant failure focusing on the physiological mechanisms involved. Smoking impairs osseointegration, the critical process where the implant integrates with the alveolar bone due to reduced blood flow oxygenation and angiogenesis caused by nicotine and carbon monoxide. Smokers exhibit higher rates of implant failure compared to non-smokers with compromised bone quality and delayed wound healing as contributing factors. Studies suggest that smoking adversely affects implant stability, particularly during the critical early healing phase. This review highlights the biological mechanisms and clinical implications of smoking on dental implant outcomes.

Proximal tibia for alveolar augmentation and augmentative rhinoplasty-a suitable option? A retrospective clinical study on donor and recipient site morbidity

BACKGROUND

Autologous bone grafts are essential in reconstructive oral and maxillofacial surgery, and depending on the donor site, they can be associated with specific harvesting morbidities. One of the most commonly applied bone grafts is the iliac crest bone graft, irrespective of other grafts, which might be associated with an easier surgical procedure or the possibility of harvesting them under local anaesthesia. Objective of the study is the clinical evaluation of proximal tibia bone grafts regarding their eligibility for maxillofacial bone grafting.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, proximal tibia bone grafts were examined with regard to associated donor and recipient site morbidity and their suitability for alveolar ridge augmentation and rhinoplasty.

RESULTS

In total, 21 tibia grafts were included. Fifty-seven percent of the bone grafts were used for alveolar ridge reconstruction, and 43% were used for augmentative rhinoplasty. No significant complications occurred during or after harvesting, but in 14.3% of the patients, minor wound healing disorders were recorded at the donor site, and in 19% of the patients, they were recorded at the recipient site. Statistically, patient sex, age, nicotine and alcohol abuse and metabolic diseases had no significant influence on the complication rate. Graft harvesting under local anaesthesia and at summer temperatures was associated with significantly more complications at the harvesting site (p < 0.05). In cases of dental implant insertion into augmented sites, the implants (n = 31) were followed up for a median period of 40.5 months, during this time 86.7% of the implants survived.

CONCLUSION

The proximal tibia is a suitable donor site for harvesting autologous bone grafts for alveolar ridge augmentation or rhinoplasty because the donor site morbidity is low, and in contrast to iliac crest bone grafts, they can be harvested under local anaesthesia, which might be advantageous for outpatient surgeries.

Systemic Factors Affecting Prognosis of Dental Implants

Clinicians who place and restore implants are always concerned about the success and longevity of the same. There are several local and systemic factors that affect osseointegration and the health of the peri-implant tissues. In this study, we review the systemic factors that can affect implant survival, osseointegration, and long-term success. The study highlights the importance of delineating, and taking into consideration these systemic factors from the planning phase to the restorative phase of dental implants. A thorough medical history, including prescription and over-the-counter medications, is vital, as there may be numerous factors that could directly or indirectly influence the prognosis of dental implants.

The Effects of Smoking on Dental Implant Failure: A Current Literature Update

Background: This systematic review assesses the current literature (2020-2024) evaluating the impact of smoking on dental implant failure rates. Methods: A non-funded Pubmed database review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines, and the results were tabulated to extract the study design, patient characteristics, follow-up time, comparison, outcome, and strengths and weaknesses, including risk of bias. This review included 33 studies with 29,519 implants placed in over 18,301 patients. We included prospective and retrospective clinical studies, randomized and non-randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, and observational studies that examined smoking's effects on implant failure rates. Studies had to classify individuals into two groups, smokers and non-smokers, with at least ten implants. Exclusions included reviews, case reports, experimental studies, guidelines, non-English publications, studies lacking comparative data on failure rates, those excluding smokers, and studies focusing on head and neck cancer patients or specialized implants. Results: Our findings indicate a significant correlation in 25 out of 33 studies between smoking and increased implant failure rates, affecting both early and late stages of implant integration and survival as well as revealing a dose-response relationship, with higher daily cigarette consumption significantly increasing the risk of implant failure. Conclusions: This review highlights the importance of smoking cessation efforts, patient education, and tailored patient care in dental implantology. Future research should explore the effects of smoking frequency and alternative tobacco products, such as e-cigarettes, aiming to improve success rates among smokers.

The Effect of Nicotine-Containing Products on Peri-Implant Tissues: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Smokers have a higher chance of developing peri-implant diseases and are therefore considered an at-risk population. Our aim was to compare peri-implant characteristics in users of electronic cigarettes (EC), waterpipes (WP), cigarettes (CS), smokeless tobacco (ST), and nonsmokers (nonusers of any nicotine and tobacco product; NS).

AIMS AND METHODS

A systematic search of four electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and CENTRAL) was performed until April 2023, restricted to English language. Thirty-nine observational studies were included in the qualitative synthesis, of which 32 studies were included in a Bayesian network meta-analysis. Using a predesigned form, two researchers independently collected data about marginal bone loss (MBL), probing pocket depth (PPD), plaque index, bleeding on probing, modified plaque index, probing pocket depth > 4 mm (PPD > 4), gingival index, peri-implant sulcular fluid volume, and TNF-α and IL-1β levels. QUIPS and CINeMA were used to evaluate the risk of bias and certainty of evidence.

RESULTS

Nonsmokers had the smallest MBL. Most nicotine-containing product users had significantly higher MBL (CS, mean difference [MD]: 1.34 credible interval [CrI]: 0.85, 1.79; WP, MD: 1.58 CrI: 0.84, 2.35; ST, MD: 2.53, CrI: 1.20, 3.87) than NS. Electronic cigarettes did not show significant difference compared to NS (MD: 0.52 CrI: -0.33, 1.36). In secondary outcomes, NS were ranked in first place. Subset analysis based on smoking habit, implant duration, and maintenance control revealed no differences in ranking probability.

CONCLUSIONS

Most nicotine-containing product users presented worse peri-implant parameters compared to NS, while EC users did not show significant differences to NS in many outcomes.

IMPLICATIONS

Alternative nicotine-containing products are gaining popularity and are often considered less harmful by the general public compared to traditional cigarettes. This is the first network meta-analysis comparing users of four nicotine-containing products and NS. This study shows that CS, WP, and ST have a detrimental effect on the overall health of peri-implant tissues. EC users also presented inferior parameters compared to NS; however, the difference was not significant in many outcomes. It is essential to educate patients who are using nicotine-containing products, and to provide proper maintenance and appropriate cessation support. Well-designed multiarmed studies are needed for direct comparison of different products, including heated tobacco products. Greater transparency of confounding factors is needed regarding smoking habit and oral hygiene.

How far can we go? A 20-year meta-analysis of dental implant survival rates

OBJECTIVE

This meta-analysis aims to investigate the long-term survival rates of dental implants over a 20-year period, providing a practical guide for clinicians while identifying potential areas for future research.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data were sourced from recent publications, focusing exclusively on screw-shaped titanium implants with a rough surface. Both retrospective and prospective studies were included to ensure an adequate sample size. A systematic electronic literature search was conducted in the databases: MEDLINE (PubMed), Cochrane, and Web of Science. The risk of bias for all studies was analyzed using a tool by Hoy et al. RESULTS: Three prospective studies (n = 237 implants) revealed a mean implant survival rate of 92% (95% CI: 82% to 97%), decreasing to 78% (95% CI: 74%-82%) after imputation (n = 422 implants). A total of five retrospective studies (n = 1440 implants) showed a survival rate of 88% (95% CI: 78%-94%). Implant failure causes were multifactorial.

CONCLUSION

This review consolidates 20-year dental implant survival data, reflecting a remarkable 4 out of 5 implants success rate. It emphasizes the need for long-term follow-up care, addressing multifactorial implant failure. Prioritizing quality standards is crucial to prevent overestimating treatment effectiveness due to potential statistical errors. While dental implantology boasts reliable therapies, there is still room for improvement, and additional high-quality studies are needed, particularly to evaluate implant success.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Never before have the implant survival over 20 years been systematically analyzed in a meta-analysis. Although a long-term survival can be expected, follow-up is essential and shouldn't end after insertion or even after 10 years.

Evidence-Based Critical Assessment of the Success Rate of Dental Implants in Smokers: An Umbrella Systematic Review

The aim of this umbrella systematic review is to evaluate the success rate and osseointegration of dental implants in patients with a smoking habit. Electronic database searches of PubMed/Medline, Google Scholar, ScienceDirect, Cochrane Library, and EBSCOhost were done from 2006 until August 2024, using medical subject headings (MeSH) terms. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses (SRMAs) investigating the association between smoking and the rate of success of dental implants based on dental implant failure, marginal bone loss, survival, and peri-implant parameters were deemed eligible. The Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews Tool 2 (AMSTAR 2) was used to assess the quality of the included SRMAs. Seventeen systematic reviews have been included. In the reviews, 10 studies included meta-analyses (MAs) that evaluated implant failure rate and marginal bone loss. According to the AMSTAR 2 checklist, one review was scored "high," seven reviews were scored "moderate," seven reviews were scored "low," and two reviews were scored "critically low" quality. The strength of evidence suggests a low level of success and high rate of failure of osseointegration of dental implants in smokers. However, the influence of smoking on the rate of dental implant failure seems to be associated with various factors such as peri-implant inflammatory markers, post-operative infections, etc. Inherently, the conclusion of this review is based on a limited number of systematic reviews.

Gingival open-wound to increase keratinized tissue in implant rehabilitation-A technical note

Keratinized tissue augmentation around implants guarantees long-term success and maintenance of implant rehabilitations. Free gingival grafting is often described as the gold standard, especially when dealing with limited residual keratinized tissue height. Traditionally, an epithelio-conjunctive graft is harvested, either on the palate or the tuberosity, to reconstruct the missing keratinized soft tissues. This article introduces an innovative approach to increase keratinized tissue around implants, benefiting from second-intention gingival healing. This original surgical approach is interesting because it does not involve autogenous grafting or biomaterials. Its main goals are to enhance predictability while reducing the numerous per and post-operative risks related to autogenous harvesting. The success of this technique depends on the observance of fundamental principles: protection against bacterial contamination (immunocompetence of the patient), phenotypic induction (preoperative presence of keratinized tissue), space maintenance, and stabilization of flaps.

Implant and implant restoration trends among adults 50 years and older in the United States, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1999-2020

BACKGROUND

Dental implants are an important treatment option in contemporary clinical dentistry. The objective of this study was to determine trends in the prevalence of dental implants and implant-supported restorations in adults 50 years and older across demographic groups over a 20-year period.

METHODS

The authors used data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey collected during 1999-2004, 2009-2014, and 2015-2020 for analyses. The authors used data from 2011 through 2020 to analyze implant-supported restoration trends. Participants 50 years or older were included in the study analytic sample. The primary outcome was the presence of dental implants and implant-supported restorations. Covariates assessed included dentition status, age, sex, race and ethnicity, education, poverty status, and smoking status. The authors used population estimates, weighted percentages, SEs, and logistic regression models for study analyses.

RESULTS

There was a total of 17,114 adults from 1999 through 2020 and 11,292 adults from 2011 through 2020 meeting the inclusion criteria. The prevalence (SE) of at least 1 dental implant increased over time, from 1.3% (0.22%) in 1999-2004 to 8.4% (0.68%) in 2015-2020. In general, those who were non-Hispanic Black, experiencing poverty, and had less than a college education were less likely to have implants than their counterparts.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the overall prevalence of implants has increased over time, disparities in prevalence were observed among certain demographic groups.

PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS

The use of dental implants in clinical dentistry has increased over time. Future research and policy initiatives could help address disparities in implant prevalence.

Three-Year Outcome of Full-Arch Fixed Prosthetic Rehabilitation through the All-on-4® Concept Using Dynamic 3D Navigated Surgery (X-Guided™): A Retrospective Study

Background/Objectives: The insertion of dental implants using dynamic 3D navigated surgery while applying immediate function protocols for full-arch rehabilitations warrants further research. This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of All-on-4® rehabilitations using 3D Dynamic navigated surgery (X-Guide™). Methods: This study included 10 patients (women: 7; men: 3; average age: 59.9 years) rehabilitated with full-arch prostheses through the All-on-4® concept, with 48 dental implants inserted using navigated surgery. The primary outcome evaluation was prosthetic/implant cumulative survival (CS), estimated using life tables. Secondary outcome evaluations were marginal bone resorption (MBR), biological complications, and mechanical complications. The evaluation parameters were measured between 1 and 3 years. Results: No patients were lost to follow-up. Two implants (4.2%) were lost in one patient (10%) with smoking habits, resulting in an implant CS rate of 95.8%. The average MBR was 0.51 mm ± 0.62 mm at the 1-year follow-up. The incidence rate of mechanical complications was 40% (n = 4 patients), all occurring in provisional prosthesis. No biological complications were registered. The patients maintained their prostheses in function throughout the follow-up of the study. Conclusions: Within the limitations of this study and based on the results, it can be concluded that the insertion of dental implants assisted by dynamic navigation for full-arch rehabilitation through the All-on-4® concept may be a valid treatment alternative in the short-term follow-up. However, more studies are necessary to validate this treatment modality.

Risk of Dental Implant Failures May Be Higher in Bruxers Than Nonbruxers

ARTICLE TITLE AND BIBLIOGRAPHIC INFORMATION

Häggman-Henrikson B, Ali D, Aljamal M, Chrcanovic BR. Bruxism and dental implants: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Oral Rehabil. 2024 Jan;51(1):202-217. 10.1111/joor.13567. Epub 2023 Aug 17. PMID: 37589382.

SOURCE OF FUNDING

None.

TYPE OF STUDY/DESIGN

Systematic review with meta-analysis.

Tribocorrosion of 3D printed dental implants: An overview

With the advancements in dental science and the growing need for improved dental health, it has become imperative to develop new implant materials which possess better geometrical, mechanical, and physical properties. The oral environment is a corrosive environment and the relative motion between the teeth also makes the environment more hostile. Therefore, the combined corrosion and tribology commonly known as tribocorrosion of implants needs to be studied. The complex shapes of the dental implants and the high-performance requirements of these implants make manufacturing difficult by conventional manufacturing processes. With the advent of additive manufacturing or 3D-printing, the development of implants has become easy. However, the various requirements such as surface roughness, mechanical strength, and corrosion resistance further make the manufacturing of implants difficult. The current paper reviews the various studies related to3D-printed implants. Also, the paper tries to highlight the role of 3D-Printing can play in the area of dental implants. Further studies both experimental and numerical are needed to devise optimized conditions for 3D-printing implants to develop implants with improved mechanical, corrosion, and biological properties.

The impact of electronic cigarettes on peri-implant health: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

Recent literature suggests that the use of electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) is a substantial contributing factor to the unsuccessful outcomes of dental implant procedures. Our aim was to systematically review the effect of e-cigarette use on clinical (PI, PD, BOP), radiographic (bone loss), and immunologic (IL-1β) peri‑implant parameters.

DATA

Main search terms used in combination: electronic cigarette, peri‑implantitis, vaping.

SOURCES

An electronic search was undertaken for MEDLINE, EMBASE, COCHRANE, and SCOPUS databases between 2017 and 2023.

STUDY SELECTION

The study protocol was developed according to PRISMA guidelines, and the focus question was formulated according to the PICO strategy. No restriction was accepted regarding language or year to avoid selection bias; the initial database search yielded 49 publications. Following the selection process, only seven studies met the inclusion criteria. Seven studies were statistically analyzed via MedCalc program. A pooled effect was deemed statistically significant if the p-value was less than 0.05.

CONCLUSION

Electronic cigarettes cause an increase in probing depth, bone loss, and the level of IL-1β, one of the bone destruction mediators in the tissues around the implant, and a decrease in bleeding on probing.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

E-cigarette is a potential risk factor for the healing process and the results of implant treatment, similar to cigarettes. Performing clinical research to evaluate the e-cigarette effect on peri‑implantitis in an age and gender-match population is needed.

An epidemiological qualitative/quantitative SWOT-AHP analysis in order to highlight the positive or critical aspects of dental implants: A pilot study

OBJECTIVES

In recent years, dental implants are increasing in popularity due to their high success rate, demonstrated functionality, and aesthetic treatment results. Scientific research is very active in proposing improvements in the quality and survival of implants, taking into consideration various aspects. The objective of this study was to provide a holistic epidemiologic view of the state of dental implants, using a systematic approach based on a multimethod SWOT (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats) analysis and AHP (analytical hierarchical process) qualitative-quantitative analysis to identify the characteristics that can determine their success or failure.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study used the hybrid method of SWOT-AHP.

RESULTS

Analysis of the results showed that among strengths, the skill of the dentist was considered the most important factor, followed by the success of dental implants in the old people; among weaknesses, bruxism and chronic diseases were highlighted; for opportunities, biomechanical behavior, in terms of good mechanical strength and good tribological resistance to chemical and physical agents in the oral cavity, were considered the most important factors; finally, among threats, medical liability and biomechanical problems had equal weight.

CONCLUSIONS

This study applied a multimethod SWOT-AHP approach to bring out favorable or critical evidence on the topic of dental implants. In accordance with the result of the strategic vector identified in the Twisting zone Adjustment type section, showed that implant surgery is a widespread technique but always needs improvement to increase the likelihood of success and reduce the complications that can lead to implant failure.

Clinical Outcomes of Maxillary Sinus Floor Perforation by Dental Implants and Sinus Membrane Perforation during Sinus Augmentation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The aim of the present systematic review was to investigate the clinical outcomes after the perforation of the maxillary sinus by dental implants, or after maxillary sinus membrane perforation during sinus lift procedure. Twenty-nine publications were included. Failure rates of implants in cases where perforation of sinus floor had happened (11 studies) was generally low, and only one case of transient sinusitis was reported. The estimated failure rate of these implants was 2.1% (SE 1.0%, p = 0.035). There were 1817 implants (73 failures) placed in augmented sinuses in which the sinus membrane was perforated and 5043 implants (274 failures) placed in sinuses with no perforated membrane, from 18 studies. The odds of implant failure difference between the groups were not significant (OR 1.347, p = 0.197). log OR of implant failure between perforated and non-perforated membrane groups did not significantly change with the follow-up time (-0.004/month; p = 0.500). In conclusion, implant failure rate is generally low either for implants penetrating in the floor of the maxillary sinus or implants placed in augmented sinuses in which the sinus membrane was perforated. The prevalence of postoperative infection/sinusitis is low, and it may depend either on the dimensions of the perforation or on the anatomical predisposition.

Hypertension and Dental Implants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE

The aim of the present systematic review was to investigate the influence of hypertension on the dental implant failure rate.

METHODS

An electronic search was undertaken in four databases, plus a manual search of journals. The I2 statistic was used to check heterogeneity and the inverse-variance method was used for the meta-analysis. The estimate of relative effect for dichotomous outcome was expressed as an odds ratio (OR).

RESULTS

The review included 24 publications. There were 4874 implants (257 failures) placed in hypertensive patients and 16,192 implants (809 failures) placed in normotensive patients. A pairwise meta-analysis showed that implants in hypertensive patients did not have a higher risk of failure than implants placed in normotensive patients (OR 1.100, p = 0.671). The log OR of implant failure between hypertensive and normotensive patients did not significantly change with the follow-up time (p = 0.824).

CONCLUSIONS

This review suggests that implants in hypertensive patients do not present higher odds of failure in comparison to normotensive patients. However, further research on this topic, with the use of more rigorous criteria to diagnose patients as being hypertensive, as well as clearer information about the pharmacological management of the condition in the patients, is recommended.

Impact of Vitamin D on Osseointegration in Dental Implants: A Systematic Review of Human Studies

This systematic review evaluates the impact of Vitamin D levels on dental implant osseointegration, hypothesizing that optimal Vitamin D enhances success rates, and aims to synthesize data on its relationship with clinical outcomes in implantology. A comprehensive search across PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases included seven peer-reviewed articles meeting the criteria for the review. These studies, conducted between 2008 and 2021, included human subjects and explicitly correlated serum Vitamin D levels with dental implant outcomes, following PRISMA guidelines. The selected studies involved 1462 participants and examined 4450 dental implants. Key findings included a varied implant loss rate ranging from 3.9% to 11.4% across the studies. One study reported a 9.8% implant loss rate, yet found no significant association between Vitamin D receptor polymorphism and implant success. Another study indicated successful implantation following Vitamin D3 supplementation, even in severe deficiency cases. The highest implant loss rate (11.1%) was observed in severely Vitamin D-deficient patients, particularly when compounded by risk factors such as smoking and periodontal disease. Additionally, one study noted significantly improved bone density following post-surgical Vitamin D supplementation for up to 12 weeks. The review supports a link between sufficient Vitamin D levels and successful dental implant osseointegration, suggesting Vitamin D deficiency as a potential risk factor for increased failure and advocating for Vitamin D evaluations in pre-surgical planning to potentially enhance implantology outcomes.

Interdisciplinary treatment of mutilated dentition and transverse maxillary deficiency with microimplant-assisted rapid palatal expansion, microimplants, and dental implants

OBJECTIVE

This case report demonstrates an interdisciplinary approach to treat a 26-year-old male patient with hyperdivergent Class II skeletal pattern, maxillary transverse deficiency, slight anterior open bite, and multiple hopeless teeth with root rests.

CLINICAL CONSIDERATIONS

An interdisciplinary treatment was required for oral hygiene improvement, caries treatment, extraction of residual roots and hopeless teeth, maxillary expansion using microimplant-assisted rapid palatal expansion, improvement of skeletal and dental relationship using orthodontic microimplants, and prosthetic restorations with the aid of dental implants.

CONCLUSION

Consequently, esthetic and functional occlusal rehabilitation was achieved.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Hyperdivergent Class II facial and skeletal patterns with multiple missing teeth can be effectively treated using orthodontic skeletal anchorage. In young adults, the transverse discrepancy can be resolved using MARPE, which is also useful for improving the sagittal and vertical relationships. In the case of multiple missing teeth, orthodontic treatment can provide the proper space to facilitate dental implants to achieve optimal esthetics and function.

Clinical outcomes of zirconia implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To assess the clinical outcomes of zirconia dental implants based on an updated systematic literature review.

METHODS

An electronic search was performed in three databases, last updated in June 2023, supplemented by hand searching. The eligibility criteria were clinical studies reporting patients rehabilitated with zirconia implants. The cumulative survival rate (CSR) of implants was calculated. A meta-analysis for marginal bone loss (MBL) under different follow-up times and a meta-regression assessing the relationship between mean MBL and follow-up were done.

RESULTS

Twenty-five studies were included (4017 implants, 2083 patients). Seven studies had follow-up longer than 60 months. 172 implants failed, after a mean of 12.0 ± 16.1 months (min-max 0.3-86.0), of which 47 early failures, and 26 due to implant fracture, the majority in narrow-diameter implants. The 10-year CSR was 95.1%. Implants with coronal part prepared by drills presented statistically significant lower survival than non-prepared implants (p < 0.001). Two-piece implants presented lower survival than one-piece implants (p = 0.017). Implants discontinued from the market presented lower survival than the commercially available ones (p < 0.001). The difference in survival was not significant between implants in maxilla and mandible (p = 0.637). The mean MBL fluctuated between 0.632 and 2.060 mm over long periods of observation (up until 132 months). There was an estimated MBL increase of 0.005 mm per additional month of follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Zirconia implants present high 10-year CSR and short-term low MBL. The review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022342055).

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The clinical outcomes observed for zirconia dental implants are very promising, although these have not yet been extensively studied as titanium alloy implants.

How Can Imbalance in Oral Microbiota and Immune Response Lead to Dental Implant Problems?

Dental implantology is one of the most dynamically developing fields of dentistry, which, despite developing clinical knowledge and new technologies, is still associated with many complications that may lead to the loss of the implant or the development of the disease, including peri-implantitis. One of the reasons for this condition may be the fact that dental implants cannot yield a proper osseointegration process due to the development of oral microbiota dysbiosis and the accompanying inflammation caused by immunological imbalance. This study aims to present current knowledge as to the impact of oral microflora dysbiosis and deregulation of the immune system on the course of failures observed in dental implantology. Evidence points to a strong correlation between these biological disturbances and implant complications, often stemming from improper osseointegration, pathogenic biofilms on implants, as well as an exacerbated inflammatory response. Technological enhancements in implant design may mitigate pathogen colonization and inflammation, underscoring implant success rates.

Simultaneous implant placement and restoration with guided bone regeneration in the mandibular anterior region

BACKGROUND

Restoring the mandibular anterior teeth by implants can be difficult due to potential complications arising from using prosthetic implant connections that are larger than the incisors at the cementoenamel junction level.

METHODS

This retrospective study is aimed at determining the survival and esthetic outcomes of anterior mandible implants immediately placed and restored in patients diagnosed with stages 3-4 periodontitis. The study included 75 implants that were inserted along with guided bone regeneration in 42 patients. Over a follow-up period of 3 to 8 years (mean of 6.95 ± 1.78 years), the study evaluated esthetic, marginal bone loss (MBL), and biological and prosthetic complications.

RESULTS

No failures were recorded during the follow-up period; after eight years, the survival rate was 100%. Patient's age and gender did not have a statistically significant impact on MBL, but smokers had a greater MBL than non-smokers at the 8-year (2.98 mm vs. 1.23 mm, respectively, p = 0.016) time-point. At 3 years, only 13.3% of the implants had mesial papillae, 36.0% had distal papillae, and 16.0% had the cervical metallic part of the abutment exposed. Peri-implantitis was diagnosed in 20.7% of the patients at the 8-year follow-up time.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the limitations of this study, immediate placement and restoration of the mandibular incisors can be a feasible procedure, but only a few implants achieved the complete restoration of the papillae.

Limited Evidence Suggests That Increased Frequency Of Daily Cigarette Smoking Might Be Associated With A Minor Increase In The Peri-Implant Bone Loss

ARTICLE TITLE AND BIBLIOGRAPHIC INFORMATION

Afshari Z, Yaghini J, Naseri R. Levels Of Smoking and Peri-Implant Marginal Bone Loss: A Systematic Review And Meta-Analysis. J. Evid.-Based Dent. Pract. 2022;22(3):101721.           SOURCE OF FUNDING: None reported.

TYPE OF STUDY/DESIGN

Systematic review with meta-analysis of data (SRM).

COVID-19 as a factor associated with early dental implant failures: A retrospective analysis

OBJECTIVES

To analyze the effect of COVID-19 on early implant failures and identify potential risk factors for early implant failure, concerning patient- and implant-related factors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study is based on 1228 patients who received 4841 implants between March 11, 2020, and April 01, 2022, at Erciyes University Faculty of Dentistry. COVID-19, age and gender of patients, smoking, diabetes, irradiation, chemotherapy, osteoporosis, the implant system, location, and characteristics of implants were recorded. At the implant level, univariate and multivariate generalized estimating equation (GEE) logistic regression was used to examine the effect of explanatory variables on early implant failure.

RESULTS

The early implant failure rate was 3.1% at the implant level and 10.4% at the patient level. Smokers showed a significantly higher incidence of early implant failures compared to nonsmokers. (odds ratio (OR; 95% CI): 2.140 (1.438-3.184); p < 0.001). Short implants (≤8 mm) had a higher risk of early implant failure than long implants (≥12 mm) (OR (95% CI): 2.089 (1.290-3.382); p = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

COVID-19 had no significant effect on early implant failure. Smoking and short implants were associated with a higher risk for early implant failures.

Is Corticalization in Radiographs Related to a Higher Risk of Bone Loss around Dental Implants in Smoking Patients? A 5-Year Observation of Radiograph Bone-Texture Changes

BACKGROUND

Currently, the topic of dental implants is widely researched. However, still compromising are the factors that can affect implant loss as a consequence of marginal bone loss. One of the factors is smoking, which has a devastating effect on human health and bone structure. Oral health and jaw condition are also negatively affected by smoking. The aim of this study was to evaluate the peri-implant jawbone corticalization phenomenon in tobacco smokers.

METHODS

A total of 2196 samples from 768 patients with an implant in the neck area were checked, and texture features were analyzed. The corticalization phenomenon was investigated. All analyses were performed in MaZda Software. The influence of corticalization was investigated as a factor on bone structure near the implant neck. The statistical analysis included a feature distribution evaluation, mean (t-test) or median (W-test) comparison, analysis of regression and one-way analysis of variance or Kruskal-Wallis test as no normal distribution or between-group variance was indicated for the significant differences in the investigated groups. Detected differences or relationships were assumed to be statistically significant when p < 0.05.

RESULTS

The research revealed that MBL was correlated with smoking after 5 years (0.42 mm ± 1.32 mm 0 mm ± 1.25 mm), the Corticalization Index was higher in the smoker group on the day of surgery, and it became higher after 5y of observation (185.98 ± 90.8 and 243.17 ± 155.47). The implant-loss frequency was higher in the group of smokers, too, compared to non-smokers (6.74% and 2.87%). The higher the torque value during the implant placement, the higher the Corticalization Phenomenon Index.

CONCLUSIONS

The research revealed a correlation between smoking and changes in bone structure in radio textures near the implants. The corticalization phenomenon is important, may be detected immediately after implant placement and may be one of the indicators of the implant success rate.

Influence of Periodontal Status and Prosthetic Treatment on Survival and Success Rates in Implant Therapy: A 5-Year Retrospective Follow-Up Study

The objective of the present study was to evaluate the 5-year outcome of dental implant therapy and assess the survival, success, and biological and technical complications. A periodontal and prosthetic-oriented evaluation was conducted on the variables that can influence the long-term predictability of implant therapy. A total of 615 patients and 1427 dental implants from a private clinic (MedArtis Dent, Cluj-Napoca, Romania) were enrolled in the study. The study was a longitudinal cohort with data collected retrospectively from physical/digital dental records in combination with a cross-sectional clinical/radiological examination. Results showed that periodontal diagnosis at baseline had a significant impact on the marginal bone loss prediction. Data showed that the cylindrical implant with an internal 45° medium taper connection experienced a higher rate of bone resorption compared to the tapered implant with the 5° internal connection. Screw-retained restorations and overdentures showed a statistical decrease in the marginal bone level height when compared to the cemented restorations. Data from our study suggest that not only is there a powerful association between recall visits and the rate of complications in dental implant treatment, but a lack of professional maintenance predicts a higher bone level loss during the 5-year interval.

Marginal bone loss around dental implants: comparison between diabetic and non-diabetic patients-a retrospective clinical study

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the present retrospective study was to compare the marginal bone loss (MBL) around dental implants in a group of diabetic patients in relation to a matched group of non-diabetic patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The present dental record-based retrospective study included patients selected from individuals treated with dental implants at one specialist clinic in Malmö, Sweden. Patients were excluded if they had history of periodontitis and/or were treated for periodontal disease. The study group included 710 implants installed in 180 patients (mean age 60.3±13.0 years), 349 implants in 90 diabetic (21 T1DM and 69 T2DM patients), and 361 implants in 90 non-diabetic patients.

RESULTS

The results suggested that jaw (greater MBL in the maxilla), diabetes (greater MBL for diabetic patients, and worse for T1DM patients), bruxism (greater MBL for bruxers), and smoking (greater MBL for smokers and former smokers) had a statistically significant influence on MBL over time.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with diabetes have an estimated greater MBL over time compared to non-diabetic patients. The difference was greater in patients with diabetes type 1 compared to patients with diabetes type 2. Bruxism, smoking, and implant location (maxilla) were also associated with a higher loss of marginal bone around implants over time.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Awareness of the possible influence of diabetes on the long-term outcomes of dental implant treatment is important, in order to be able to minimize the possibility of a high MBL with time, which can eventually lead to the loss of the implant.

Dental implant failure and factors associated with treatment outcome: A retrospective study

PURPOSE

The purpose of the present study was to retrospectively 1) investigate the association between implant-, patient- and bone-related parameters with the risk of implant failure; 2) analyze the survival rates of dental implants placed in a university clinical setting.

METHODS

Data were retrieved from patient charts from the University of Minnesota School of Dentistry to identify patients older than 18 years of age who received dental implant treatment by faculty, residents or students in the university dental clinics. Implant-, patient- and bone-related parameters such as implant system, length, diameter, jaw, region, installation protocol, gender, smoking, medical history, history of periodontal disease, self-reported oral parafunctions, type of bone, and operator were manually retrieved and analyzed.

RESULTS

Five hundred and fifty-three implants were randomly selected from a total of 4,424. Of these 553 implants, 440 (79.6%) were associated with a >10 mm length, 371 (67.1%) with a >4 mm diameter and 431 (77.9%) had replaced a single tooth. Submerged healing mode was followed in 363 (65.6%) of the implants with the mean healing time being 3.2 months. History of periodontal disease was identified in 294 (53.2%) of these cases. A total of 17 implants failed after a mean time of 6.29 ± 6.75 months, resulting in an overall survival rate of 96.9%. Based on a univariate analysis, implant system, operator, time between extraction and implant surgery, time between bone grafting and implant placement, tobacco use as well as clenching and grinding were considered potential implant failure predictors and were further included in the multivariate logistic regression analysis. Tobacco use (p < 0.001) was significantly associated with implant failure.

CONCLUSION

Within the limitations of this retrospective randomly selected university-treated sample tobacco use increased the risk for implant failure. Failure occurred in 17 implants representing a 3.1% failure rate.

Clinical outcomes of full-arch immediate fixed prostheses supported by two axial and two tilted implants: A retrospective cohort study with 12-15 years of follow-up

PURPOSE

To retrospectively assess clinical and radiographic outcomes of immediately loaded full-arch fixed prostheses supported by axial and tilted implants up to 15 years of function.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with one completely edentulous arch received an immediate full-arch fixed prosthesis supported by two anterior axial and two posterior tilted implants. Definitive prosthesis consisting of a CAD-CAM titanium framework and acrylic teeth was delivered 6 months later. Patients were regularly followed to assess clinical parameters and marginal bone level (MBL) change. Multilevel regression analysis was performed to investigate factors affecting implant failure and MBL.

RESULTS

Six hundred ninety-two implants were placed in 72 maxillae and 101 mandibles. Seven maxillary implants (5 axial and 2 tilted) in 6 patients and 12 mandibular implants (6 axial and 6 tilted) in 5 patients failed. 15-year cumulative implant survival was 97.51% and 96.91% in maxilla and mandible, respectively (p = .64). After 10 years, the difference in MBL between axial and tilted implants was not significant in the maxilla (p = .47, 65 patients), while it was in the mandible (p < .001, 80 patients). Significant higher bone loss was reported in the mandible at both 5- and 10-year follow-up (p < .001 and p = .004, respectively). Mixed-effect multilevel linear regression evidenced a correlation between arch and bone loss at 5- and 10-year follow-up, while no correlation was found with age, gender, smoking, diabetes, and history of periodontal disease.

CONCLUSION

This long-term study suggests that the present technique can be considered a viable treatment modality for the immediate rehabilitation of both maxilla and mandible.

Frequency of Smoking and Marginal Bone Loss around Dental Implants: A Retrospective Matched-Control Study

This dental record-based retrospective study aimed to compare the marginal bone loss (MBL) around dental implants in a group of smokers in relation to a matched group of non-smokers, with a special focus on five different frequencies of daily smoking (non-smokers, and frequency of 1-5, 6-10, 11-15, and 20 cig./day). Only implants with a minimum of 36 months of radiological follow-up were considered. Univariate linear regression models were used to compare MBL over time between 12 clinical covariates, after which a linear mixed-effects model was built. After matching of the patients, the study included 340 implants in 104 smokers, and 337 implants in 100 non-smokers. The results suggested that smoking degree (greater MBL for higher degrees of smoking), bruxism (greater MBL for bruxers), jaw (greater MBL in maxilla), prosthesis fixation (greater MBL for screw-retained prosthesis), and implant diameter (greater MBL for 3.75-4.10 mm) had a significant influence on MBL over time. There appears to be a positive correlation between the degree of smoking and the degree of MBL, meaning, the higher the degree of smoking, the greater the MBL. However, the difference is not apparent for different degrees of smoking when this is high, namely above 10 cigarettes per day.

Marginal bone loss around dental implants: comparison between matched groups of bruxer and non-bruxer patients: A retrospective case-control study

PURPOSE

To compare marginal bone loss (MBL) around dental implants in a group of bruxers in relation to a matched group of non-bruxers.

METHODS

The present record-based retrospective study included patients selected from individuals treated with dental implants at one specialist clinic in Malmö. Only implants not lost and with baseline radiographs taken within 12 months after implant placement and with a minimum of 36 months of radiological follow-up were considered for inclusion. Univariate linear regression models and a linear mixed-effects model were performed.

RESULTS

Two hundred and four patients (104 bruxers, 100 non-bruxers), with a total of 811 implants (416 in bruxers, 395 in non-bruxers) were included in the study. The results of the linear mixed-effects model suggested that bruxism, smoking, age, region of the jaws, implant diameter, and prosthesis type had a statistically significant influence on MBL over time. Individuals who are both bruxers and smokers showed greater MBL when compared to individuals who are either a bruxer or smoker, or neither (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Bruxism is suggested to increase the risk of MBL over time, as well as higher age, smoking, and the combination of bruxism and smoking. Other factors that showed a correlation with increased MBL were implant diameter, region of the jaws, and prosthesis type, but it is not possible to draw robust conclusions for these factors, as the categories of these variables were very unbalanced.

On Peri-Implant Bone Loss Theories: Trying To Piece Together the Jigsaw

This review aims to explore the plausibility of new theories on the etiopathogenesis of marginal bone loss (MBL) and peri-implantitis (PI) and to discuss possible underlying pathogenic mechanisms. The former concept of osteointegration of dental implants can now be conceptualized as a foreign body response histologically characterized by a bony demarcation in combination with chronic inflammation. Different risk factors can provoke additional inflammation and, therefore, pro-inflammatory cytokine release in soft tissues and bone, leading to an overpass of the threshold of peri-implant bone defensive and regenerative capacity. Progressive bone loss observed in MBL and PI is ultimately due to a localized imbalance in the receptor activator of nuclear factor kappaB ligand (RANKL)/Receptor activator of nuclear factor κ B (RANK)/osteoprotegerin (OPG) pathway in favor of increased catabolic activity. The genetic background and the severity and duration of the risk factors could explain differences between individuals in the threshold needed to reach an imbalanced scenario. MBL and PI pathogenesis could be better explained by the "inflammation-immunological balance" theory rather than a solely "infectious disease" conception. The link between the effect of biofilm and other risk factors leading to an imbalanced foreign body response lies in osteoclast differentiation and activation pathways (over)stimulation.

SMOKING MIGHT INCREASE THE FAILURE RATE AND MARGINAL BONE LOSS AROUND DENTAL IMPLANTS

ARTICLE TITLE AND BIBLIOGRAPHIC INFORMATION

Mustapha AD, Salame Z, Chrcanovic BR. Smoking and Dental Implants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Medicina. 2021 Dec 27;58(1):39.

SOURCE OF FUNDING

No external sources of funding were available for conducting this study.

TYPE OF STUDY/DESIGN

Systematic review (SR) with meta-analysis (MA) of data.

Survival Rates and Factors Affecting the Outcome Following Immediate and Delayed Implant Placement: A Retrospective Study

Background: Immediate implant placement into extraction sockets has become a widely acceptable treatment option to decrease treatment time and enhance esthetics. The objectives of this study were to assess and compare the survival rates of immediate and delayed implant treatment as well as to investigate the effect of patient- and site-related variables on the treatment outcome in a large-scale population-based study. Methods: Dental records of patients who received implant therapy were retrieved from the electronic records of the University of Minnesota School of Dentistry. Demographic characteristics, dental insurance status, socioeconomic status as well as medical history and tobacco use were recorded. The treatment outcome was included as a binary variable (survival/failure). Time to failure (date of procedure to date of visit with failure) was compared between immediate and delayed implant treatment in Cox regression models. Kaplan−Meier plots for the survival of both treatment modalities were created. Patient-sites without failure were censored at the last follow-up visit. Results: A total of 4519 records of implants were included. The sample mean age was 60.27 years and included 50.7% males and 12.9% tobacco users. High socioeconomic status was characterized for 82.3% of the included population and 63.0% of them were self-payers. Immediate implants were significantly more frequently placed in the maxillary arch (p < 0.001) than in the mandible. Tobacco users received more often a delayed rather than an immediate implant placement (p = 0.001). The survival rate analysis revealed there were no significant differences between immediate and delayed implant placements (p = 0.48). The mean follow-up time was 32.27 months during which 1.5% immediate and 1.1% delayed implants were removed. The estimated mean survival time for immediate implants was 68.90 months, while delayed implants placed in healed sockets showed a mean survival time of 75.11 months. A statistically significant association was found between gender (p = 0.03) and osteoporosis (p = 0.001) with treatment outcome. Conclusions: The placement of immediate implants achieved similarly high survival rates when compared to delayed implants placed in healed sites. Males and osteoporotic individuals showed significantly higher implant failure than females and non-osteoporotic patients. This study demonstrated that both immediate and delayed implant placements are sound options with predictable treatment outcome.

Effect of restoration material on marginal bone resorption around modified anatomic zirconia dental implants: A randomised controlled trial

Objective

The primary aim of this study was to determine the effect of implant-supported porcelain-fused-to-metal (PFM) and indirect-composite-resin (ICR) fixed dental prostheses on peri-implant marginal bone resorption (MBR) in custom-made anatomic modified zirconia dental implants.

Methods

A prospective randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted. Participants with premolars indicated for dental extractions were recruited into this study to receive a single-unit implant-supported fixed dental prosthesis. Modified anatomic zirconia implants with thorny-retentive surfaces were placed and loaded randomly after 3 months with either PFM or ICR crowns. Participants were recalled after 12 and 18 months for radiographic evaluation of peri-implant MBR. Implants survival was also reported.

Results

18 out of 20 zirconia implants were included in all study phases. 18-month survival rate was 90%. After 12 months of implant placement, the mean MBR values were 0.53 (±0.21) mm and 0.60 (±0.14) mm in the ICR group compared to 0.67 (±0.16) mm and 0.61 (±0.27) mm in the PFM group. In the 18-month follow-up, the mean MBR values were 0.61 (±0.27) and 0.67 (±0.16) mm in the ICR group compared to 0.77 (±0.29) and 0.77 (±0.27) mm in the PFM group. No significant differences were found in MBR mean values between study groups at 12- and 18-month follow-up points.

Conclusion

This study showed that PFM and ICR crowns were viable zirconia-implant-supported restorations with no preference regarding MBR after 18 months. Nevertheless, long-term evaluations are warranted.

•

Custom-made zirconia implants with new design of their macro-retentive features (thorns) were used in this clinical study.

•

They showed success rate of 90% with all failures occurred early before loading.

•

Peri-implant marginal bone resorption (MBR) ranged within acceptable values after 12 and 18 months.

•

No significant differences in MBRs were seen between implant-supported metal-ceramic and indirect composite restorations.

Diabetes Mellitus and Dental Implants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The present review aimed to evaluate the impact of diabetes mellitus on dental implant failure rates and marginal bone loss (MBL). An electronic search was undertaken in three databases, plus a manual search of journals. Meta-analyses were performed as well as meta-regressions in order to verify how the odds ratio (OR) and MBL were associated with follow-up time. The review included 89 publications. Altogether, there were 5510 and 62,780 implants placed in diabetic and non-diabetic patients, respectively. Pairwise meta-analysis showed that implants in diabetic patients had a higher failure risk in comparison to non-diabetic patients (OR 1.777, p < 0.001). Implant failures were more likely to occur in type 1 diabetes patients than in type 2 (OR 4.477, p = 0.032). The difference in implant failure between the groups was statistically significant in the maxilla but not in the mandible. The MBL mean difference (MD) between the groups was 0.776 mm (p = 0.027), with an estimated increase of 0.032 mm in the MBL MD between groups for every additional month of follow-up (p < 0.001). There was an estimated decrease of 0.007 in OR for every additional month of follow-up (p = 0.048). In conclusion, implants in diabetic patients showed a 77.7% higher risk of failure than in non-diabetic patients.