Strategies to Reduce Post-Hemorrhoidectomy Pain: A Systematic Review

Botulinum toxin injection for management of post-haemorrhoidectomy pain: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials

INTRODUCTION

Excisional haemorrhoidectomy remains the gold-standard treatment for grade III-IV haemorrhoids owing to the high success rate. However, post-operative pain management is an ongoing challenge. Botulinum toxin injection is thought to improve pain by targeting the internal anal sphincter spasm which occurs following haemorrhoidectomy. This systematic review and meta-analysis examines the effects of concurrent botulinum toxin injection on post-haemorrhoidectomy pain.

METHODS

A search of MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Databases for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of botulinum toxin injection compared with placebo for management of post-haemorrhoidectomy pain was conducted following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Outcomes assessed included daily post-operative pain scores assessed using an analogue scale (0-10), pain at first defecation, analgesia use, complication rates and time to return to work.

RESULTS

A total of seven RCTs assessing 340 patients who underwent an excisional haemorrhoidectomy were included. In total, seven studies (n = 340) found significant reduction in pain post-procedure with botulinum toxin use on day 1 (mean difference, MD -1.53; 95% confidence intervals, CI -2.12, -0.94; p < 0.00001), with similar findings on day 2 and 4 (MD -1.84, 95% CI -3.28, -0.41; p = 0.01 and MD -1.63, 95% CI -2.15, -1.09; p < 0.00001, respectively). However, the analgesic effects were not seen on subsequent analyses up to day 14. Botulinum toxin was seen to be safe, with no significant difference in faecal incontinence (MD 1.05, 95% CI 0.40, 2.75; p = 0.93) or urinary retention (MD 0.37, 95% CI 0.09, 1.53; p = 0.17).

CONCLUSIONS

Botulinum toxin use for pain relief post-excisional haemorrhoidectomy is safe and effective in the initial peri-operative period; however, the results were short-lived. Further, more robust randomised controlled trials are needed to strengthen these findings and determine the utility of botulinum toxin in this setting.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO Register for Systematic Reviews Registration Number - CRD42024541351 on April 29 2024.

Utilisation of Deep Neural Networks for Estimation of Cajal Cells in the Anal Canal Wall of Patients with Advanced Haemorrhoidal Disease Treated by LigaSure Surgery

Interstitial cells of Cajal (ICCs) play a key role in gastrointestinal smooth muscle contractions, but their relationship with anal canal function in advanced haemorrhoidal disease (HD) remains poorly understood. This study uses deep neural network (DNN) models to estimate ICC presence and quantity in anal canal tissues affected by HD. Haemorrhoidectomy specimens were collected from patients undergoing surgery with the LigaSure device. A YOLOv11-based machine learning model, trained on 376 immunohistochemical images, automated ICC detection using the CD117 marker, achieving a mean average precision (mAP50) of 92%, with a recall of 86% and precision of 88%. The DNN model accurately identified ICCs in whole-slide images, revealing that one-third of grade III HD patients and 60% of grade IV HD patients had a high ICC density. Preoperatively, pain was reported in 35% of grade III HD patients and 41% of grade IV patients, with a significant reduction following surgery. A significant decrease in bleeding (p < 0.0001) was also noted postoperatively. Notably, patients with postoperative bleeding, diagnosed with stage IV HD, had high ICC density in their anorectal tissues (p = 0.0041), suggesting a potential link between ICC density and HD severity. This AI-driven model, alongside clinical data, may enhance outcome prediction and provide insights into HD pathophysiology.

Comparative Outcomes of Milligan-Morgan (Open) Versus Ferguson (Closed) Hemorrhoidectomy: A Retrospective Study

Introduction The debate remains unresolved about whether an open (Milligan-Morgan) or closed (Ferguson) approach is superior for hemorrhoidectomy. Advocates from both groups state that each has its own set of advantages and disadvantages. In light of this, we intend to share our experience by comparing the two in terms of their post-operative outcomes. This study aims to compare open (Milligan-Morgan) and closed (Ferguson) hemorrhoidectomy in terms of post-operative outcomes. Materials and methods This retrospective study was carried out at the Department of Surgery, Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences, Islamabad, Pakistan. A total of 137 patients who underwent hemorrhoidectomy from January 1, 2022, to May 31, 2024, were enrolled. Post-operative outcomes were noted in terms of surgical site infection (SSI), excessive bleeding, and visual analog scale (VAS) pain score. Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 25 (Released 2017; IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Results A total of 137 patients were enrolled in the study, with 93 (67.9%) undergoing Milligan-Morgan (open) hemorrhoidectomy and 44 (32.1%) undergoing the Ferguson (closed) procedure. The mean age in the open group was 46.87 ± 10.79 years, compared to 44.59 ± 9.06 years in the closed group. Male participants comprised 59 (63.4%) in the open group and 19 (43.2%) in the closed group. SSI was observed in 32 patients (23.3%); 22 (68.8%) were from the open group, and 10 (31.3%) were from the closed group (p-value, 0.905). Hemorrhage was recorded in 34 patients (15.3%), with 21 (61.8%) in the open group and 13 (38.2%) in the closed group (p-value, 0.378). The mean post-operative VAS pain score was 3.76 ± 1.79 for the open technique versus 4.07 ± 1.37 for the closed technique, respectively (p-value, 0.321). Conclusion Though the SSI and hemorrhage rates were higher with the Milligan-Morgan technique than with the Ferguson technique, the mean post-operative VAS score was also higher with the Milligan-Morgan procedure. However, none of the differences was found to be statistically significant.

Best clinical practice recommendations for the management of symptomatic hemorrhoids via laser hemorrhoidoplasty: the LHP recommendations

BACKGROUND

Laser hemorrhoidoplasty (LHP) has emerged as a novel, minimally invasive technique for managing symptomatic hemorrhoids, gaining popularity among clinicians. Despite its increasing adoption, significant variations exist in the application of LHP across different practices.

PURPOSE

The aim of these recommendations was to spell out some basic principles and recommendations for performing a standard LHP procedure.

METHODS

The Recommendation Development Group (RDG) consisting of surgeons with experience in LHP were invited to formulate recommendations for the procedure. The recommendations were generated following systematic literature research and discussion amongst experts (expert opinion) where no substantial literature was available. The developed recommendations were voted upon by a panelist via the Delphi process. Consensus was a priori defined as agreement of 75% and above, with strong consensus defined as 85% and above.

RESULTS

The RDG developed 21 recommendations that were voted upon by 49 panelists. Consensus was reached for all 21 recommendations after the first Delphi round, including 16 recommendations with strong consensus.

CONCLUSION

The RDP offers a comprehensive suite of guidelines to enhance the safety and efficacy of standard LHP procedures. Out of 21 detailed recommendations, 16 reached strong consensus, collectively addressing the full spectrum of LHP procedures-from laser settings and preoperative preparations to perioperative strategies and postoperative care. This coherent framework is anticipated not only to standardize but also to refine the LHP technique across the board, thereby elevating the management of symptomatic hemorrhoidal disease.

Does the addition of perineal block enhance pain control after a haemorrhoidectomy? A prospective randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled study

BACKGROUND

Haemorrhoidectomy is associated with severe postoperative pain, a long rehabilitation, and QoL worsening for months. Most patients experience mild-to-moderate postoperative pain. We aimed to evaluate the intraoperative perineal block role for patients undergoing haemorrhoidectomy.

METHODS

In this prospective randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, eligible patients with III-IV stage haemorrhoids were randomized to the experimental group (EG) with intraoperative perineal block and spinal anaesthesia and the control one (CG) only with spinal anaesthesia. During the postoperative period, the opioid consumption rate was evaluated as a primary endpoint, and the postoperative pain level according to VAS, systemic analgesics consumption, readmission, and complication rate, the timing of returning to work, patients' QoL, and overall satisfaction according to SF-36 were evaluated as secondary endpoints.

RESULTS

One hundred patients completed the study (48 in EG and 52 in CG). Patients of the EG had less postoperative pain intensity (P < 0.0001), required less opioid analgesia (P = 0.03), and had longer pain-free postoperative periods (P = 0.0002). 90% of patients in the CG required additional NSAID injections for adequate analgesia compared with only 58% in the EG. The average hospital stays, complication rate, and average operation duration didn't reach clinical significance. General health evaluation according to the SF-36 score and the median satisfaction rate was better in the EG (P < 0.001 and P = 0.012, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The administration of the perianal block is safe and effective and should be administered to appropriate patients undergoing anorectal surgery.

Exploration of the mechanism underlying the therapeutic effect of electroacupuncture at chengshan acupoint on post-hemorrhoidectomy anal pain: Insights from the mAChRs/IP3-Ca2+-CaM signaling pathway

OBJECTIVE

In the context of postoperative anal pain, understanding the intricate mechanisms and effective interventions is paramount. This study investigates the role of Muscarinic Acetylcholine Receptors (mAChRs) and the IP3-Ca2+-CaM signaling pathway in a rat model of postoperative anal pain, exploring the potential analgesic effects of electroacupuncture.

METHODS

Comprehensive approaches involving mechanical sensitivity assays, Western blotting, immunohistochemistry, and intracellular calcium concentration measurement were used.

RESULTS

The authors found elevated mAChRs expression in the postoperative pain model. Antagonizing mAChRs reduced pain sensitivity and attenuated the IP3-Ca2+-CaM pathway. Remarkably, electroacupuncture treatment further mitigated pain, potentially by suppressing this signaling cascade.

INTERPRETATION

These findings reveal a novel connection between mAChRs and the IP3-Ca2+-CaM pathway in postoperative anal pain and suggest electroacupuncture as a promising avenue for pain relief through these mechanisms, offering insights into innovative strategies for postoperative pain management.

Flavonoids and post haemorrhoidectomy recovery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Haemorrhoidectomy is the gold standard for definitive treatment of high-grade symptomatic haemorrhoids but is often associated with substantial pain. This systematic review aims to explore the potential of flavonoids in alleviating the postoperative symptom burden following excisional haemorrhoidectomy.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was conducted according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines (PROSPERO CRD42023472711). Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus from inception to 1st December 2023 were retrieved. The primary outcome investigated was post-operative pain. Meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager version 5.4.1.

RESULTS

Ten articles with 775 patients were included. The meta-analysis identified statistically significant decreases in post-operative pain in favour of the flavonoid groups (Standardized Mean Difference -0.66 [95% confidence intervals (CI) -0.82, -0.52]; P < 0.00001), and bleeding (Odds Ratio 0.13 [95% CI 0.09, 0.19]; P < 0.00001).

CONCLUSION

Flavonoids show promise as a means of reducing pain associated with excisional haemorrhoidectomy. Further research is required to investigate topical routes of administration and standardize regimes.

Topical metronidazole after haemorrhoidectomy to reduce postoperative pain: a systematic review

Excisional haemorrhoidectomy is the gold standard for operating haemorrhoids, but it is accompanied by a significant problem: postoperative pain. Several strategies have been adopted to minimize this condition. Oral metronidazole has been proven to reduce postoperative pain but with some complications. This systematic review was conducted to investigate the effects and general efficacy of topical metronidazole administration and to evaluate its potential superiority over the oral formula. A systematic review of the literature was carried out. Randomized controlled trials published until September 2023 on PubMed, Central, and Web of Science were considered. The primary outcome considered was postoperative pain, which was evaluated using visual analogue scores. The secondary outcomes were analgesic use, return to work, and complications. Six randomized controlled trials were included, with a total of 536 patients. Topical metronidazole was compared with placebo in two studies, with oral formula in three studies, and with placebo and oral administration in one study. Topical metronidazole was found to be effective for treating postoperative pain when compared to a placebo but had no significant advantage over the oral formula. No complications were reported in the studies. Topical and oral metronidazole are effective solutions for postoperative pain after excisional haemorrhoidectomy. No superiority was demonstrated based on the route of administration, and complications were marginal for both formulas. Further studies are required to determine the best metronidazole solution.

Analgesic Efficacy of EMLA Cream Among Patients Undergoing Hemorrhoidectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Post-hemorrhoidectomy pain is a concerning complication for patients and doctors, mainly due to perianal skin dissection and the complex innervation of the area. Therefore, our aim is to explore the analgesic efficacy and safety of EMLA cream among patients undergoing hemorrhoidectomy. We conducted a comprehensive search of five electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane) from inception until July 6, 2024. A risk of bias assessment was performed using the Risk of Bias Version 2 of the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials (RoB-2). Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included. Our outcomes of interest were pain assessment using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score, patient satisfaction, meperidine dosage, frequency of meperidine requests, and single urinary catheterization. We used RevMan software to conduct the statistical analysis. Dichotomous data were pooled as relative risk (RR), while continuous data were pooled as mean difference (MD). Four RCTs were included in our review. Two RCTs showed a low overall risk of bias, while one RCT showed a high risk, and the last one showed some concerns. Our analysis showed a significant difference between the two groups, favoring the EMLA group over the control group, upon arrival at the recovery room and at night on the day of the operation (MD=-1.76, 95% CI (-3.17, -0.36), p=0.01 and MD=-1.65, 95% CI (-2.48, -0.81), p=0.0001, respectively). However, there was no significant difference between the two groups in the morning on the day after the operation (MD=-0.9, 95% CI (-2.02, 0.21), p=0.11). Moreover, patients who used EMLA cream reported increased patient satisfaction compared to those who did not. However, there was no significant difference between both groups in terms of the use of urinary catheterizations. In conclusion, our study showed that applying EMLA cream over the perianal area after hemorrhoidectomy can effectively reduce postoperative pain and decrease the required opioid dosage and patient requests. This ultimately leads to increased patient satisfaction. However, further studies are still required to confirm these findings.

Efficacy and Safety of Snap Needles in the Treatment of Postoperative Hemorrhoidal Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Purpose

The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Snap Needles (SN) in the management of Postoperative Hemorrhoidal Pain (POHP).

Patients and Methods

A systematic search was conducted in various databases, including EMBASE, Web of Science, PubMed, WanFang database, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), China Biomedical Literature Database (CBM), and China Science and Technology Journal Database (VIP), spanning from their inception to August 2023, to identify relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on SN for POHP. The primary outcome measure was the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), while secondary outcomes encompassed the Total Effective Rate (TER), Wound Healing Time (WHT), Pain Relief Time (PRT), Pain Disappearance Time (PDT), and Adverse Events (AEs). The Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool was employed to assess the quality of individual studies. A meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.4.1 software.

Results

The meta-analysis included 11 RCTs involving 1188 POHP patients, with an overall assessment of study quality ranging from very low to moderate. The findings revealed that the SN group exhibited significant improvements in treatment outcomes when compared to the control group (CG). These improvements were reflected in reduced VAS scores (mean difference [MD] = -1.10, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -1.31, -0.89, P < 0.05), shorter WHT (MD = -2.55, 95% CI: -3.02, -2.09, P < 0.05), quicker PRT (MD = -7.99, 95% CI: -8.48, -7.49, P < 0.05), fewer AEs (risk ratio [RR] = 0.38, 95% CI: 0.22, 0.67, P < 0.05), improved TER (RR = 1.18, 95% CI: 1.09, 1.27, P < 0.05), and faster PDT (MD = 19.24, 95% CI: 14.17, 24.31, P < 0.05).

Conclusion

The use of SN appears to yield favorable outcomes in the treatment of POHP, and is potentially an alternative therapy to western drug therapy.

Management of Hemorrhoids and Anal Fissures

Hemorrhoids and anal fissures are two of the most common benign anorectal diseases. Despite their high prevalence, diagnostic accuracy of benign anorectal disease is suboptimal at 70% for surgeons, especially for hemorrhoidal diseases. Once the diagnosis is correctly made, numerous medical and surgical treatment options are available, each with different rates of success and complications. In this article, the authors review each step of patient management, with emphasis on evidence-based treatment options for hemorrhoids and anal fissures. The article discusses the pathophysiology, diagnosis, medical management, and procedures for hemorrhoids followed by a detailed overview on the management of anal fissures.

Myrrh sitz bath for wound healing after hemorrhoidectomy: A retrospective study of adverse effects and treatment outcomes

Background and Aim

Hemorrhoids affect 75% of people worldwide. surgical hemorrhoidectomy remains the definitive intervention for severe cases. Postoperative wound care is critical, and alternative treatments, like Myrrh, are of growing interest due to their potential wound-healing properties. This study aimed to compare the safety, efficacy, and treatment outcomes of Myrrh sitz baths with standard clinical care in promoting wound healing after hemorrhoidectomy.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study was carried out using medical records from Abha Private Hospital for the period of January-December 2022. The data of patients who underwent hemorrhoidectomy were collected and categorized based on postoperative wound care into two groups: Group A for Myrrh-based wound care as a self-medication and Group B for standard wound care.

Results

The study included 67 patients who underwent hemorrhoidectomy. Out of these patients, 52 had standard wound care, while 15 used Myrrh-based wound care as self-treatment without medical advice. The Myrrh group patients were significantly older with more comorbidities. The Myrrh group had significant Grade III wound healing outcomes 9/15 (60%) compared to the standard care group 2/52 (3.8%) (p < 0.001). However, despite the better healing outcomes, the Myrrh group had a significantly higher complication rate 7/15(46.7%) than the standard care group 1/52 (1.9%) (p < 0.001). These results indicate that despite the good healing capacity of Myrrh, cautious usage must be considered.

Conclusion

Myrrh sitz baths appear more effective than standard wound care in enhancing healing after hemorrhoidectomy. However, increased complications suggest the necessity for comprehensive evaluation and research on its safety profile. These findings can guide future research and clinical practices related to postoperative wound care.

The effect of bupivacaine on analgesia and safety in patients undergoing hemorrhoidectomy: a meta-analysis

Aim: There is no meta-analysis reporting the analgesic effect and safety of bupivacaine in patients undergoing hemorrhoidectomy. This meta-analysis provides quantitative evidence of the effect of bupivacaine in hemorrhoidectomy. Methods: Studies were searched from PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and the Web of Science. Standardized mean difference (SMD), weighted mean difference (WMD), and odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were used as effect indicators. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I 2 index, and sensitivity analysis was conducted to determine the effect of the single study on the pooled results. Results: A total of 18 studies were included in this meta-analysis. The pain level at 48 h was lower in the bupivacaine-combined other drug group than in the other drug group (WMD = -0.65, 95% CI: 1.18 to -0.11, and I2 = 37.50%). Compared to the bupivacaine group, the odds of pruritus (OR = 12.11, 95% CI: 1.49-98.59, and I2 = 0%) and urinary retention (OR = 4.45, 95% CI: 1.12-17.70, and I2 = 0%) were higher, and the pain level at 6 h (WMD = -2.13, 95% CI: 3.22 to -1.04, and I2 = 64.30%), at 12 h (WMD = -1.55, 95% CI: 2.19 to -0.90, and I2 = 56.10%), and at 24 h (SMD = -1.15, 95% CI: 1.89 to -0.42, and I2 = 82.5%) were lower in the bupivacaine-combined other drug group. Conclusion: Bupivacaine-combined other drugs had a good analgesic effect after hemorrhoidectomy, but the adverse reactions should be considered.

Clinical evidence and rationale of mesoglycan to treat chronic venous disease and hemorrhoidal disease: a narrative review

Chronic venous disease (CVD) and hemorrhoidal disease (HD) are among the most common vascular diseases in the world, with CVD affecting 22-41% of the population in Europe and HD having a point prevalence of 11-39%. The burden is substantial in terms of the effect of symptoms on patients' health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and direct/indirect medical costs. Treatment begins with lifestyle changes, compression in CVD and topical therapies in HD, and escalates as needed through oral therapies first and eventually to surgery for severe disease. CVD and HD share etiological features and pathological changes affecting the structure and function of the tissue extracellular matrix. Mesoglycan, a natural glycosaminoglycan (GAG) preparation composed primarily of heparan sulfate and dermatan sulfate, has been demonstrated to positively impact the underlying causes of CVD and HD, regenerating the glycocalyx and restoring endothelial function, in addition to having antithrombotic, profibrinolytic, anti-inflammatory, antiedema and wound-healing effects. In clinical trials, oral mesoglycan reduced the severity of CVD signs and symptoms, improved HRQoL, and accelerated ulcer healing. In patients with HD, mesoglycan significantly reduced the severity of signs and symptoms and the risk of rectal bleeding. In patients undergoing excisional hemorrhoidectomy, adding mesoglycan to standard postoperative care reduced pain, improved HRQoL, reduced incidence of thrombosis, and facilitated an earlier return to normal activities/work, compared with standard postoperative care alone. The clinical effects of mesoglycan in patients with CVD or HD are consistent with the agent's known mechanisms of action.

Accelerated wound healing after topical application of hyaluronic acid cotton to hemorrhoidectomy wounds in a rat model

Purpose

Anal wounds following hemorrhoidectomy can lead to severe pain and postoperative bleeding, impacting patient recovery and quality of life. Hyaluronic acid (HA) stimulates tissue regeneration and wound healing by accelerating cell migration and proliferation. This study aimed to investigate the differences in wound healing rate and completeness of recovery of perianal wounds topically treated with HA-soaked cotton in a murine model.

Methods

Forty-eight 8-week-old Sprague-Dawley rats with perianal wounds created using a biopsy punch were divided into 2 groups: simple dressing with gauze (control) and topical HA-soaked cotton. A single application of HA-soaked cotton was administered after surgery. Wound healing rate and completeness of recovery were evaluated by measuring the healed area and conducting histological analyses.

Results

The HA-cotton group exhibited a shorter complete wound healing duration compared to the control group (13.9 days vs. 16.4 days, P = 0.031). Differences in wound healing area between the 2 groups were greatest on postoperative day 2 (51.6% vs. 28.8%, P < 0.001). The HA-cotton group exhibited fewer cases of granulation tissue (2 vs. 5) or redness (0 vs. 3) upon complete wound healing. Histologically, the HA-cotton group showed accelerated reepithelialization, rapid shift to lymphocyte-dominant inflammation, enhanced fibroblast proliferation, and increased collagen deposition compared to the control group.

Conclusion

Herein, topical application of HA-soaked cotton on perianal wounds in rats resulted in accelerated wound healing, particularly in the initial stages, and improved completeness of recovery, underscoring the potential of the topical application of HA-soaked cotton on hemorrhoidectomy wounds in human patients to improve wound healing.

General anesthesia with local infiltration reduces urine retention rate and prolongs analgesic effect than spinal anesthesia for hemorrhoidectomy

Introduction

Postoperative pain and complications pose significant challenges following a hemorrhoidectomy. Attaining effective anesthesia with minimal complications is crucial. The ideal anesthesia method for ambulatory hemorrhoidectomy remains uncertain. This study aimed to investigate whether the combination of general anesthesia plus local infiltration (GAL) is associated with lower complications and reduced pain compared to spinal anesthesia (SA) in the context of hemorrhoidectomy.

Methods

This retrospective single-center cohort study, conducted in a tertiary medical center in East Asia, evaluated excisional hemorrhoidectomies performed between January 1, 2017, and March 31, 2023, utilizing GAL or SA. Data on the six most common complications-pain, constipation, acute urine retention (AUR), bleeding, nausea, and headache-were extracted from medical records. A total of 550 hemorrhoidectomies were included: 220 in the GAL group and 330 in the SA group. Patient characteristics were comparable between the two groups.

Results

The AUR rate was significantly lower in the GAL group compared to the SA group (15.5% vs. 32.1%, P < 0.001). Although the proportion of pain scores ≥4 did not differ significantly between the GAL and SA groups (36.2% vs. 39.8%, P = 0.429), the pain score curve indicated a stable trend. Overall, the GAL group exhibited a lower rate of adverse effects (56.9% vs. 67.4%, P = 0.023). There were no significant differences in the rates of other complications and emergency department readmission between the GAL and SA groups.

Discussion

GAL emerges as a favorable choice for anesthesia in hemorrhoidectomy, demonstrating a lower incidence of urine retention and a prolonged analgesic effect in multiple hemorrhoidectomies. These findings support the conclusion that GAL represents an optimal anesthetic method for enhancing the postoperative experience in patients undergoing hemorrhoidectomy.

Safety and Efficacy of Oral Nalbuphine on Postoperative Pain in Hemorrhoidectomy Patients: A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Pivotal Trial

OBJECTIVES

Severe postoperative pain requiring opioid treatment has been reported in 20% to 40% of hemorrhoidectomy patients. Compared with morphine, nalbuphine offers better hemodynamic stability, a lower risk of respiratory depression, and a lower potential for addiction. Nalbuphine was developed from the intravenous form into an oral form (PHN131) to alleviate moderate-to-severe pain.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multiple-dose, parallel-design trial was conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of PHN131 in patients undergoing hemorrhoidectomy. Eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive either PHN131 soft capsules containing nalbuphine hydrochloride 60 mg or placebo capsules. Intramuscular diclofenac was the rescue analgesic. Pain was measured by the area under the curve of mean Visual Analog Scale pain intensity scores.

RESULTS

Visual Analog Scale results in patients receiving PHN131 were significantly lower than placebo group scores through 48 hours postoperatively (149.2±75.52 vs. 179.6±65.97; P =0.0301). According to Brief Pain Inventory Short-Form scores, the impact of pain on quality of life was significantly smaller for the PHN131 group than for the placebo group. Time to the first use of diclofenac postoperatively was significantly longer in the PHN131 group than in the placebo group. The cumulative dosage of diclofenac in the PHN131 group was only around half of that in the placebo group ( P <0.0001). Drug-related adverse events were mild-to-moderate and resolved by the treatment end. No drug-related severe adverse events were observed.

DISCUSSION

Our findings demonstrate that PHN131 is effective and well-tolerated in the treatment of moderate-to-severe post hemorrhoidectomy pain and may provide another option for patients to control their pain.

Analgesic effect of subcutaneous injection of different concentrations of methylene blue after hemorrhoidectomy: A retrospective study

Objective

Subcutaneous injection of methylene blue around the anus may help reduce postoperative pain. However, the concentration of methylene blue is still controversial. Therefore, Our study aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of different methylene blue injected concentrations subcutaneously in pain treatment after hemorrhoidectomy.

Methods

A total of 180 consecutive patients with grade III or IV hemorrhoids from March 2020 to December 2021 were reviewed. All patients underwent hemorrhoidectomy under spinal anesthesia and were divided into three groups. Group A received subcutaneous injection of 0.1% methylene blue after hemorrhoidectomy, group B received subcutaneous injection of 0.2% methylene blue, and Group C did not received subcutaneous injection of methylene blue. The primary outcome measures were the visual analog scale (VAS) pain score on postoperative days 1, 2, 3, 7, 14, and total analgesic consumption within 14 days. Secondary outcomes were complications after hemorrhoidectomy, including acute urinary retention, secondary bleeding, perianal incision edema, and perianal skin infection, and the Wexner scores used to assess the level of anal incontinence at one and three months after surgery.

Results

There was no significant difference among three groups in sex, age, course of the disease, hemorrhoid grade and the number of incisions, and there was no significant difference in the volume of methylene blue injected between group A and group B. The VAS pain score and total analgesics consumption within 14 days in group A and group B were significantly lower than those in group C, but the differences between group A and group B were not statistically significant. The Wexner scores of group B were significantly higher than those of group A and group C one month after the operation, but the differences between group A and group C were not statistically significant. In addition, the Wexner score among three groups decreased to zero at three months after operation. There was no significant difference in the incidence of other complications among three groups.

Conclusion

The perianal injection of 0.1% methylene blue and 0.2% methylene blue have a similar analgesic effect in pain treatment after hemorrhoidectomy, but 0.1% methylene blue has higher safety.

Comparing the efficacy and safety of different analgesic strategies after open hemorrhoidectomy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of different analgesic interventions in the treatment of pain after open hemorrhoidectomy by systematic review and network meta-analysis.

METHODS

Randomized controlled trials that met the inclusion criteria in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, CNKI, WANFANG DATA, and VIP were searched from the date of database construction to June 28, 2022.

RESULTS

Among the 13 randomized controlled trials (RCTs), 731 patients were included in the network meta-analysis. Most interventions are more effective than placebo in relieving postoperative pain. 24 h postoperative Visual Analogue Scale (VAS): glyceryl trinitrate (GTN) (mean difference (MD) - 4.20, 95% CI - 5.35, - 3.05), diltiazem (MD - 1.97, 95% CI - 2.44, - 1.51), botulinum toxin (BT) (MD - 1.50, 95% CI - 2.25, - 0.75), sucralfate (MD - 1.01, 95% CI - 1.53, - 0.49), and electroacupuncture (EA) (MD - 0.45, 95% CI - 0.87, - 0.04). 48 h postoperative VAS: diltiazem (MD - 2.45, 95% CI - 2.74, - 2.15), BT (MD - 2.18, 95% CI - 2.52, - 1.84), and sucralfate (MD - 1.41, 95% CI - 1.85, - 0.97). 7 d postoperative VAS: diltiazem (MD - 2.49, 95% CI - 3.20, - 1.78) and sucralfate (MD - 1.42, 95% CI - 2.00, - 0.85). The first postoperative defecation VAS: EA (MD - 0.70, 95% CI - 0.95, - 0.46). There are few data on intervention safety, and additional high-quality RCTs are expected to study this topic in the future.

CONCLUSION

Diltiazem ointment may be the most effective medication for pain relief following open hemorrhoidectomy, and it can dramatically reduce pain within one week of surgery. The second and third recommended medications are BT and sucralfate ointment. GTN has a significant advantage in alleviating pain 24 h after open hemorrhoidectomy, but whether it causes headache is debatable; thus, it should be used with caution. EA's analgesic efficacy is still unknown. There was limited evidence on the safety of the intervention in this study, and it was simply presented statistically.

Picking Up the Threads: Long-Term Outcomes of the Sutured Haemorrhoidopexy: A Retrospective Single-Centre Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to assess the short- and long-term safety and efficacy of the sutured haemorrhoidopexy (SH) in patients with haemorrhoidal disease (HD).

METHODS

A retrospective study was performed, assessing the following treatment characteristics: number of sutures needed; operation time; perioperative complications; postoperative pain; hospital stay. The short- and long-term postoperative complications, HD recurrence and data on current HD symptoms were assessed according to the Core Outcome Set for HD.

RESULTS

Between January 2009 and December 2021, 149 patients with HD underwent a SH. One-hundred and forty-five patients were included, with a mean age of 61 years (±12.8), of which 70 were women (48.3%). Patients were predominantly diagnosed with grade III (37.2%) HD and the median follow-up was nine years (5-11). Perioperative complications occurred in four cases (2.8%). In two patients (1.4%), short-term postoperative complications were reported, and in seven patients (6.2%), long-term complications were reported. The cumulative efficacy in terms of freedom of recurrence was 88.3% (95% CI, 83.1-93.5) at six months, 80.0% (95% CI, 73.5-86.5) at one year, and 67.7% (95% CI, 59.7-75.7) at five years.

CONCLUSIONS

Sutured haemorrhoidopexy is a safe treatment for patients with HD and can be proposed as a minimally invasive surgical treatment if basic and outpatient procedures fail.