Pericardial Involvement in Severe COVID-19 Patients

Incidence of secondary pericardial effusions associated with different etiologies: a comprehensive review of literature

Pericardial effusion is a relatively common complication associated with inflammatory and non-inflammatory diseases. The primary etiology of this condition could be considered when choosing therapeutic options and factors such as effusion size and its hemodynamic consequence. In most cases, small to moderate pericardial effusions can be managed with observation and anti-inflammatory medications unless the effusion develops rapidly. However, in a small proportion of patients, large effusions lead to impaired cardiac filling with hemodynamic compromise and cardiovascular collapse due to cardiac tamponade. The rate at which fluid accumulates is the primary determinant of hemodynamic impact and thus guides the choice of treatment, irrespective of the effusion's size. Severe cases are typically treated with pericardiocentesis with echocardiographic guidance. More aggressive treatments may be necessary for cases due to purulent or malignant etiologies. These cases may require a pericardial window to allow for long-term drainage of the pericardial fluid. This comprehensive review focuses on the epidemiology of pericardial effusion and discusses pathophysiology, diagnostic approaches, and therapeutic options for different causes of secondary pericardial effusions.

Surviving COVID-19 and Battling Fibrosis: A Retrospective Cohort Study Across Three Pandemic Waves

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

We aimed to characterize the fibrosis following COVID-19 pneumonia, using quantitative analysis, after three months and subsequently, after two years of patients' release from the hospital, and to identify the risk factors for pulmonary fibrosis.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective, observational cohort study on 420 patients with severe forms of COVID-19. For all patients, we registered demographic, inflammatory and biochemical parameters, complete blood count and D-dimers; all patients underwent three computed tomography scans (at admittance, at 3 months and at 2 years).

RESULTS

We found fibrosis in 67.9% of patients at the 3-month evaluation and in 42.4% of patients at the 2-year evaluation, registering a significant decrease in the severe and moderate fibrosis cases, with a slight increase in the mild fibrosis cases. The risk of fibrosis was found to be proportional to the values of age, duration of hospital stay, inflammatory markers (ESR, fibrinogen), cytolytic markers (LDH, AST) and D-dimers. The highest correlations with lung fibrosis were registered for interstitial pulmonary involvement (for the 3-month evaluation) and total pulmonary involvement (for the 2-year evaluation).

CONCLUSIONS

Lung fibrosis represents a significant post-COVID-19 complication found in 42% of patients with severe forms of pneumonia at the 2-year evaluation. A significant overall decrease in the severity of lung fibrosis was registered at the 2-year evaluation compared to the 3-month evaluation. We consider that the amount of interstitial pulmonary involvement represents the optimal parameter to estimate the risk of lung fibrosis following SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia.

Early Outcomes of the Surgical Treatment of Non-traumatic Massive Pericardial Effusion in the University of the Philippines - Philippine General Hospital COVID-19 Referral Center

Objective

To describe the treatment outcomes of patients who underwent tube pericardiostomy for all etiologies of non-traumatic massive pericardial effusion or tamponade during the COVID-19 pandemic and determine the association between patient profile and treatment outcomes.

Methods

Data were obtained from patients with massive pericardial effusion or cardiac tamponade who underwent surgical drainage from January 1, 2020, to September 1, 2022, in the University of the Philippines - Philippine General Hospital (UP-PGH). These patients' demographic and clinical profiles, and treatment outcomes were evaluated using frequencies and percentages. Chi-squared and Fisher's tests determined the differences between COVID (+) and (-) groups. Odds Ratio was used to assess the risk of complications and mortality.

Results

The study population comprised 90 patients with a mean age of 45 years. 54.4% were females. Fifteen (16.67%) were COVID-19 (+) and 75 (83.33%) were COVID-19 (-). Most of the patients were of O+ blood type (34.4%), with no smoking history (67.8%) and no COVID-19 vaccination (76.7%). Common comorbidities were cancer (70%), tuberculosis infection (32.2%), and hypertension (25.6%). No significant difference was found between the two study groups. The presentation was subacute (one week to three months) (62.2%), with the most common symptoms of dyspnea (81.1%), orthopnea (61.1%), and cough (52.2%). Tachycardia (80%) and tachypnea (57.8%) were the most common presenting signs. Hypotension was found more frequently among COVID-19 (+) patients (46.7% vs. 12.0%, p = 0,003, 95% CI). Most patients had abnormal WBC, coagulopathy, elevated inflammatory markers, and cardiac biomarkers. Sinus tachycardia, regular sinus rhythm, ST-T wave changes, and low voltage QRS were common ECG findings. The most common chest X-ray results were pleural effusion (80%), pneumonia (71.1%), and enlarged cardiac border (42.2%). Majority of echocardiographic findings were large effusion (>2 cm) (97.8%), RV collapse (40%), and RA collapse (23.3%). An average of 628 ml of pericardial effusion was drained, predominantly serous and exudative. One specimen yielded a positive AFB culture. 6.7% showed carcinoma cells on fluid cytology. The pericardium was normal in 78.9%. 10.0% of the pericardial biopsy specimen had carcinoma, with metastatic cancer being the most common etiology. The most common cancers were lymphoma (22.7%), breast (25.8%), and lung (16.7%). Hospital length of stay was 18 days in COVID-19 (+) patients and 12 days in COVID (-). The complication and in-hospital mortality rate in the COVID-19 (+) compared to the (-) group (86.7% vs. 73.3% and 46.7% vs. 41.3%, respectively) were not statistically significant. The most common complications were respiratory failure (60%), shock (53.3%), and nosocomial pneumonia (40%). There was no association between clinical factors and the risk for complications. Any complication increased the risk for mortality (OR 15.0, 95% CI 3.2-19.7, p=0.002). The presence of hypertension (OR 0.08, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.4, p=0.001) and subacute duration (OR 0.3, 95% CI 0.09 -0.9, p=0.045) decreased the mortality risk.

Conclusions

Profiles were similar in both groups. There was no association between patient profile and complications. Having COVID-19 did not affect patient outcome. The presence of any complication increases the risk of mortality. In-hospital mortality was high at 42.2%.

Pericardial and Pleural Effusions in Non-ICU Hospitalized Patients with COVID-19-A Retrospective Single-Center Study

Background: Pericardial and pleural effusions are two complications recently described in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 infections. There are several mechanisms that have been proposed and refer to SARS-CoV-2's capacity to bind to cell surfaces via various receptors and its broad tissue tropism that might cause significant complications. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the incidence of pericardial and pleural effusions during COVID-19 infection as well as to determine the risk factors associated with these complications. Methods: We conducted a retrospective single-center study that included 346 patients admitted to the National Institute of Infectious Disease "Prof. Dr. Matei Bals" (Bucharest, Romania), from 1 January to 25 May 2021, during the third wave of the pandemic. Socio-demographic and anthropometric data were collected for each patient. The patients were evaluated clinically, biologically, and radiologically within 48 h of admission. Patients were divided into 3 groups: (1) patients with pericardial effusions-18; (2) patients with pleural effusions-28; (3) patients without pericardial/pleural effusions-294. Results: After exclusion criteria were applied, 337 patients were analyzed. The median age of the participants was 58.26 ± 14.58 years. More than half of the hospitalized patients had associated respiratory failure (61.5%), of which 2.7% had a critical form of the disease and 58.8% had a severe form. The cumulative percentage for pericardial and pleural effusions for the study group was 12.8% (43 patients out of 337). The prevalence of pericardial effusion was 5.3%, twice more frequent among male respondents. Pleural effusion was identified in 8.3% patients. Most patients had unilateral effusion (17), compared to 11 patients who had bilateral involvement. Based on laboratory results, patients with pericardial and pleural effusions exhibited increased levels of C reactive protein, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, NT proBNP, and a higher value of neutrophil/lymphocyte count ratio. In contrast to patients without pleural and pericardial effusions, those with these symptoms experienced a higher frequency of severe or critical illness and longer hospital stays. Conclusions: Pericardial and pleural effusions can complicate COVID-19 infections. In our study, the prevalence of pericardial and pleural effusions in hospitalized patients was low, being associated with the same comorbidities and a number of clinical and biological parameters.

"When," "Where," and "How" of SARS-CoV-2 Infection Affects the Human Cardiovascular System: A Narrative Review

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is caused by the novel severe acute respiratory coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2). Several explanations for the development of cardiovascular complications during and after acute COVID-19 infection have been hypothesized. The COVID-19 pandemic, caused by SARS-CoV-2, has emerged as one of the deadliest pandemics in modern history. The myocardial injury in COVID-19 patients has been associated with coronary spasm, microthrombi formation, plaque rupture, hypoxic injury, or cytokine storm, which have the same pathophysiology as the three clinical variants of Kounis syndrome. The angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), reninaldosterone system (RAAS), and kinin-kallikrein system are the main proposed mechanisms contributing to cardiovascular complications with the COVID-19 infection. ACE receptors can be found in the heart, blood vessels, endothelium, lungs, intestines, testes, neurons, and other human body parts. SARS-CoV-2 directly invades the endothelial cells with ACE2 receptors and constitutes the main pathway through which the virus enters the endothelial cells. This causes angiotensin II accumulation downregulation of the ACE2 receptors, resulting in prothrombotic effects, such as hemostatic imbalance via activation of the coagulation cascade, impaired fibrinolysis, thrombin generation, vasoconstriction, endothelial and platelet activation, and pro-inflammatory cytokine release. The KKS system typically causes vasodilation and regulates tissue repair, inflammation, cell proliferation, and platelet aggregation, but SARS-CoV-2 infection impairs such counterbalancing effects. This cascade results in cardiac arrhythmias, cardiac arrest, cardiomyopathy, cytokine storm, heart failure, ischemic myocardial injuries, microvascular disease, Kounis syndrome, prolonged COVID, myocardial fibrosis, myocarditis, new-onset hypertension, pericarditis, postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome, pulmonary hypertension, stroke, Takotsubo syndrome, venous thromboembolism, and thrombocytopenia. In this narrative review, we describe and elucidate when, where, and how COVID-19 affects the human cardiovascular system in various parts of the human body that are vulnerable in every patient category, including children and athletes.

Evaluation of cardiac diagnostic tests findings based on pro-BNP levels in COVID-19 pregnant patients

BACKGROUND

Pro-b-type natriuretic peptide (Pro-BNP) is an inflammatory marker that indicates cardiac damage and inflammation. The elevation of this marker in COVID-19 patients can be used as a predictive factor in the prognosis of these patients.

METHOD

Our cross-sectional study investigated the evaluation of cardiac diagnostic test findings based on pro-BNP levels in pregnant COVID-19 patients in Sayyad Shirazi Hospital, Gorgan, Iran, in 2020-2022. A hundred and ten pregnant patients diagnosed with COVID-19 infection were evaluated for cardiac diagnostic tests (electrocardiogram (ECG) and echocardiography (Echo)) and pro-BNP levels. Data were analyzed using SPSS 25 software. Chi-square and Student's t-test will be used to test and compare the relationship between variables and compare them. A P-value less than 0.05 is considered statistically significant. The chi-square test was used to compare the ratio of qualitative variables among the groups if the presuppositions of chi-square distribution were established. Otherwise, Fisher's exact test was used.

RESULT

The mean age of participants were 31.06 ± 5.533 years and 49.1% of patients had pro-BNP levels above the cut-off value for predicting an adverse outcome of COVID-19. The mean ± standard deviation of pro-BNP levels in the low group was 46.125 ± 17.523 pg/mL and in the high group was 878.814 ± 1038.060 pg/mL. This study revealed that patients with higher pro-BNP plasma levels had a significant relation between, myocardial infarction (MI), pericardial effusion (PE), urgent Caesarean section (C/S), and mortality. In addition, no significant relation between gravid, trimester, vaccination, arrhythmia, heart block, and valves diseases with high pro-BNP levels was found.

CONCLUSION

The current research showed that pro-BNP levels can be used as a diagnostic and valuable prognostic tool in pregnant women to diagnose cardiac complications by using ECG and Echo.

COVID-19 exacerbating ESRD induced pericardial effusion requiring pericardial window: A case report

INTRODUCTION

Pericardial effusion can lead to cardiac tamponade requiring immediate management. Pericardial windows are an effective measure to surgically drain recurrent effusions.

PRESENTATION OF CASE

We present a case of a 53-year-old male with recurrent pericardial effusion secondary to ESRD and exacerbated by COVID-19 infection, describing the successful management of an uncommon clinical scenario. A sub-xiphoid pericardial window and right sided thoracostomy was performed.

DISCUSSION

There are limited case reports highlighting recurrent pericardial effusion management, secondary to ESRD and COVID-19 in a post renal transplant patient, through a subxiphoid pericardial window.

CONCLUSION

COVID-19 infection can exacerbate pericardial effusion in a patient with ESRD, post renal transplant. Preventing cardiac tamponade, a sub-xiphoid pericardial window remains an effective measure in treating recurrent pericardial effusion.

Coagulation Disorders in Sepsis and COVID-19-Two Sides of the Same Coin? A Review of Inflammation-Coagulation Crosstalk in Bacterial Sepsis and COVID-19

Sepsis is a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Sepsis-associated coagulation disorders are involved in the pathogenesis of multiorgan failure and lead to a subsequently worsening prognosis. Alongside the global impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, a great number of research papers have focused on SARS-CoV-2 pathogenesis and treatment. Significant progress has been made in this regard and coagulation disturbances were once again found to underlie some of the most serious adverse outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 infection, such as acute lung injury and multiorgan dysfunction. In the attempt of untangling the mechanisms behind COVID-19-associated coagulopathy (CAC), a series of similarities with sepsis-induced coagulopathy (SIC) became apparent. Whether they are, in fact, the same disease has not been established yet. The clinical picture of CAC shows the unique feature of an initial phase of intravascular coagulation confined to the respiratory system. Only later on, patients can develop a clinically significant form of systemic coagulopathy, possibly with a consumptive pattern, but, unlike SIC, it is not a key feature. Deepening our understanding of CAC pathogenesis has to remain a major goal for the research community, in order to design and validate accurate definitions and classification criteria.

Predictors of Liver Injury in Hospitalized Patients with SARS-CoV-2 Infection

Background and Objectives: SARS-CoV-2 infection is frequently associated with pneumonia but has a broad tissue tropism also leading to systemic complications (hematologic, gastro-intestinal, cardiac, neurologic, etc.). In this study, we aim to evaluate the impact of COVID-19 infection on the liver and to identify the risk factors/predictors for liver injury at admission to the hospital. Materials and Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study on 249 patients, divided into two Group A (157 patients with liver involvement) and Group B (92 patients without liver involvement). We recorded demographic and lifestyle parameters, anthropometric parameters, comorbidities, clinical parameters, inflammation markers, complete blood count, coagulation, and biochemical parameters. Lung parenchyma, liver dimensions, and morphology were evaluated by computer tomography (CT) scans. Results: Patients with liver involvement had higher heart and respiratory rates, lower oxygen saturation (SO₂), and necessitated higher oxygen flow at admittance. We found higher serum levels of C-reactive protein, fibrinogen, ferritin, creatine kinase, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), serum triglycerides, and lower values for serum albumin in Group A patients. The patients with liver involvement presented more extensive lung injury with higher percentages of alveolar, mixed, and interstitial lesions, an increase in liver dimensions, and lower density ranges for the liver parenchyma. The patients presented hepatocytolytic involvement in 26 cases (10.4% from the entire study population), cholestatic involvement in 63 cases (37.7% from the entire study population), and mixed liver involvement in 68 cases (37.7% from the entire study population). Conclusions: Liver involvement in COVID-19 patients is frequent, usually mild, and occurs mostly in male patients over 50 years old. Cholestatic and mixed liver injuries are more frequent than hepatocytolytic injuries. The severity of lung injury evaluated by CT scan, increased values of inflammatory markers, LDH, and low values of SO₂ can be considered risk factors/predictors for liver injury at admission to the hospital.

Could an Increased Percentage of Immature Granulocytes Accompanying Dyspepsia Predict COVID-19?

Background and Aim: Although vaccination practices continue at a fast pace around the world, the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) still threatens people’s lives. In this study, we aimed to determine the presence of SARS-CoV-2 in patients who do not have the typical symptoms of the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), but only present with dyspepsia, and to investigate the role of immature granulocytes in the early diagnosis of these patients. Material and Methods: Adult and pediatric patients suffering from dyspepsia were included in the study. The patients were divided into two groups, ‘‘positive’’ and ‘‘negative’’, based on their SARS-CoV-2 polymerase chain reaction test results. Immature granulocyte count (IG), immature granulocyte percentage (IG%), C-reactive protein (CRP), and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) values were recorded. Results: A total of 238 patients, including 25 (10.5%) pediatric and 213 (89.5%) adult patients, were included in the study. A total of 2 (8%) pediatric patients and 17 (7.9%) adult patients tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. The IG, IG%, and CRP parameters were significantly higher in the SARS-CoV-2-positive patients compared to the SARS-CoV-2-negative patients. The optimal cut-off value predictive of COVID-19 infection was determined to be ≥0.650 (sensitivity: 52.6% and specificity: 95.5%, p = 0.001) for IG%. Conclusions: It should be noted that dyspepsia may also be a COVID-19 symptom. IG% values, which can be determined with a hemogram test, a cheap and easily accessible test, may be a warning in the early detection of patients who do not have the typical symptoms of COVID-19.

Pulmonary Involvement in SARS-CoV-2 Infection Estimates Myocardial Injury Risk

Background and Objectives: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection represents a pathology with primary pulmonary involvement and multisystemic impact, including cardiovascular injuries. The present study aimed to assess the value of clinical, biochemical, and imaging factors in COVID-19 patients in determining the severity of myocardial involvement, and to create a model that can be used toevaluate myocardial injury risk based on clinical, biochemical and imaging factors. Materials and Methods: We performed an observational cohort study on 150 consecutive patients, evaluating their age, sex, hospitalization period, peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO₂) in ambient air, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate, biochemical markers of cardiac dysfunction (TnI, and NT-proBNP), inflammatory markers (C reactive protein (CRP), fibrinogen, serum ferritin, interleukin-6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα)), D-dimers, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), myoglobin and radio-imaging parameters. All patients underwent computerized tomography chest scan in the first two days following admission. Results: We observed elevated heart and respiratory rates, higher systolic blood pressure, and a lower diastolic blood pressure in the patients with cardiac injury; significant differences between groups were registered in TnI, NT-proBNP, LDH, CRP, and D-dimers. For the radiological parameters, we found proportional correlations with the myocardial injury for the severity of lung disease, number of pulmonary segments with alveolar consolidation, number of pulmonary lobes with pneumonia, crazy paving pattern, type of lung involvement, the extent of fibroatelectatic lesions and the mediastinal adenopathies. Conclusions: Myocardial injury occurred in 12% of patients in the study group. Ground glass opacities, interstitial interlobular septal thickening (crazy paving pattern), fibroatelectasic lesions and alveolar consolidations on CT scan were correlated with myocardial injury. Routine lung sectional imaging along with non-specific biomarkers (LDH, D-dimers, and CRP) can be further valuable in the characterization of the disease burden, thus impacting patient care.