Cenobamate (YKP3089) and Drug-Resistant Epilepsy: A Review of the Literature

Drug-Induced Myoclonus: A Systematic Review

Background and Objectives: Myoclonus is already associated with a wide variety of drugs and systemic conditions. As new components are discovered, more drugs are suspected of causing this disabling abnormal involuntary movement. This systematic review aims to assess the medications associated with drug-induced myoclonus (DIM). Materials and Methods: Two reviewers assessed the PubMed database using the search term "myoclonus", without language restriction, for articles published between 1955 and 2024. The medications found were divided into classes and sub-classes, and the subclasses were graded according to their level of evidence. Results: From 12,097 results, 1115 were found to be DIM. The subclasses of medications with level A evidence were intravenous anesthetics (etomidate), cephalosporins (ceftazidime, cefepime), fluoroquinolones (ciprofloxacin), selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (citalopram, escitalopram, paroxetine, sertraline), tricyclic antidepressant (amitriptyline), glutamate antagonist (amantadine), atypical antipsychotics (clozapine, quetiapine), antiseizure medications (carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine, phenytoin, gabapentin, pregabalin, valproate), pure opioid agonist (fentanyl, morphine), bismuth salts, and mood stabilizers (lithium). The single medication with the highest number of reports was etomidate. Drug-induced asterixis is associated with a specific list of medications. The neurotransmitters likely involved in DIM are serotonin, dopamine, gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA), and glutamate. Conclusions: DIM may be reversible with management that can include drug discontinuation, dose adjustment, and the prescription of a medication used to treat idiopathic myoclonus. Based on the main clinical constellation of symptoms and pathophysiological mechanisms found in this study, DIM can be categorized into three types: type 1 (serotonin syndrome), type 2 (non-serotonin syndrome), and type 3 (unknown).

Differential Inhibition by Cenobamate of Canonical Human Nav1.5 Ion Channels and Several Point Mutants

Cenobamate is a new and highly effective antiseizure compound used for the treatment of adults with focal onset seizures and particularly for epilepsy resistant to other antiepileptic drugs. It acts on multiple targets, as it is a positive allosteric activator of γ-aminobutyric acid type A (GABAA) receptors and an inhibitor of neuronal sodium channels, particularly of the late or persistent Na+ current. We recently evidenced the inhibitory effects of cenobamate on the peak and late current component of the human cardiac isoform hNav1.5. The determined apparent IC50 values of 87.6 µM (peak) and 46.5 µM (late current) are within a clinically relevant range of concentrations (the maximal plasma therapeutic effective concentration for a daily dose of 400 mg in humans is 170 µM). In this study, we built a 3D model of the canonical hNav1.5 channel (UniProt Q14524-1) in open conformation using AlphaFold2, embedded it in a DPPC lipid bilayer, corrected the residue protonation state (pH 7.2) with H++, and added 2 Na+ ions in the selectivity filter. By molecular docking, we found the cenobamate binding site in the central cavity. We identified 10-point mutant variants in the binding site region and explored them via docking and MD. Mutants N1462K/Y (rs1064795922, rs199473614) and M1765R (rs752476527) (by docking) and N932S (rs2061582195) (by MD) featured higher predicted affinity than wild-type.

Inhibitory Effects of Cenobamate on Multiple Human Cardiac Ion Channels and Possible Arrhythmogenic Consequences

Cenobamate is a novel third-generation antiepileptic drug used for the treatment of focal onset seizures and particularly for multi-drug-resistant epilepsy; it acts on multiple targets: GABAA receptors (EC50 42-194 µM) and persistent neuronal Na+ currents (IC50 59 µM). Side effects include QTc interval shortening with >20 ms, but not <300 ms. Our in vitro cardiac safety pharmacology study was performed via whole-cell patch-clamp on HEK293T cells with persistent/inducible expression of human cardiac ion channel isoforms hNav1.5 (INa), hCav1.2 (α1c + β2 + α2δ1) (ICaL), hKv7.1 + minK (IKs), and hKv11.1 (hERG) (IKr). We found IC50 of 87.6 µM (peak INa), 46.5 µM (late INa), and 509.75 µM (ICaL). In experiments on Ncyte® ventricular cardiomyocytes, APD90 was reduced with 28.6 ± 13.5% (mean ± SD) by cenobamate 200 µM. Cenobamate's marked inhibition of INa raises the theoretical possibility of cardiac arrhythmia induction at therapeutic concentrations in the context of preexisting myocardial pathology, in the presence of action potential conduction and repolarization heterogeneity. This hypothetical mechanism is consistent with the known effects of class Ib antiarrhythmics. In simulations with a linear strand of 50 cardiomyocytes with variable inter-myocyte conductance based on a modified O'Hara-Rudy model, we found a negligible cenobamate-induced conduction delay in normal tissue, but a marked delay and also a block when gap junction conduction was already depressed.

Cenobamate, a New Promising Antiseizure Medication: Experimental and Clinical Aspects

About 40-50% of patients with drug-resistant epilepsy do not properly respond to pharmacological therapy with antiseizure medications (ASMs). Recently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency as an add-on drug for focal seizures, cenobamate is an ASM sharing two basic mechanisms of action and exhibiting a promising profile of clinical efficacy. The drug preferably inhibits persistent sodium current and activates GABA-mediated events via extrasynaptic, non-benzodiazepine receptors. Thus, its antiseizure potential is dependent on both reducing excitation and enhancing inhibition in the central nervous system. In experimental seizure models, cenobamate exhibited a clear-cut activity in many of them with promising protective indexes, with only bicuculline-induced seizures being unaffected. Randomized clinical trials indicate that combinations of cenobamate, with already prescribed ASMs, resulted in significant percentages of seizure-free patients and patients with a significant reduction in seizure frequency, compared to other ASMs in the form of an add-on therapy. Its greater antiseizure efficacy was accompanied by adverse events comparable to other ASMs. Cenobamate has also been shown to possess neuroprotective activity, which may be of importance in affecting the process of epileptogenesis and, thus, modifying the course of epilepsy.

New Pharmacological Therapies in the Treatment of Epilepsy in the Pediatric Population

Epilepsy is a disorder characterized by abnormal brain neuron activity, predisposing individuals to seizures. The International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) categorizes epilepsy into the following groups: focal, generalized, generalized and focal, and unknown. Infants are the most vulnerable pediatric group to the condition, with the cause of epilepsy development being attributed to congenital brain developmental defects, white matter damage, intraventricular hemorrhage, perinatal hypoxic-ischemic injury, perinatal stroke, or genetic factors such as mutations in the Sodium Channel Protein Type 1 Subunit Alpha (SCN1A) gene. Due to the risks associated with this condition, we have investigated how the latest pharmacological treatments for epilepsy in children impact the reduction or complete elimination of seizures. We reviewed literature from 2018 to 2024, focusing on the age group from 1 month to 18 years old, with some studies including this age group as well as older individuals. The significance of this review is to present and compile research findings on the latest antiseizure drugs (ASDs), their effectiveness, dosing, and adverse effects in the pediatric population, which can contribute to selecting the best drug for a particular patient. The medications described in this review have shown significant efficacy and safety in the studied patient group, outweighing the observed adverse effects. The main aim of this review is to provide a comprehensive summary of the current state of knowledge regarding the newest pharmacotherapy for childhood epilepsy.

Efficacy, tolerability and safety of add-on third-generation antiseizure medications in treating focal seizures worldwide: a network meta-analysis of randomised, placebo-controlled trials

Background

Adjunctive newer antiseizure medications (ASMs) are being used in patients with treatment-resistant focal-onset seizures (FOS). An updated network meta-analysis (NMA) was necessary to compile evidence in this critical area.

Methods

We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus from their inception until 17 January 2024, evaluating the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of rufinamide (RUF), brivaracetam (BRV), cenobamate (CNB), eslicarbazepine (ESL), lacosamide (LCM), retigabine (RTG), and perampanel (PER) as adjunctive treatments for FOS. Efficacy outcomes included seizure response and seizure freedom. Tolerability was assessed by discontinuation due to adverse events (AEs). Safety outcomes were evaluated based on the number of patients experiencing at least one AE and serious adverse events (SAEs). This review is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023485130).

Findings

A total of 29 studies involving 11,750 participants were included. For seizure response, all ASMs were significantly superior to placebo, with RTG ranking highest, followed by CNB. Considering dosage, CNB 400 mg/d was top-ranked, followed by RTG 1200 mg/d. For seizure freedom, BRV was highest-ranked, followed by CNB, with BRV 100 mg/d leading, followed by CNB 400 mg/d. Regarding tolerability, LCM 600 mg/d had the lowest ranking, followed by CNB 400 mg/d. For the safety outcome of AEs, ESL 1200 mg/d was ranked lowest, followed by CNB 400 mg/d. Regarding SAEs, LCM 400 mg/d was ranked lowest, followed by RTG 1200 mg/d.

Interpretation

ASMs at different dosages have varying efficacy and tolerability profiles. We have provided hierarchical rankings of ASMs for efficacy and safety outcomes. Our findings offer the most comprehensive evidence available to inform patients, families, physicians, guideline developers, and policymakers about the choice of ASMs in patients with treatment-resistant FOS.

Funding

None.