Cefiderocol-Based versus Colistin-Based Regimens for Severe Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii Infections: A Propensity Score-Weighted, Retrospective Cohort Study during the First Two Years of the COVID-19 Pandemic

Effectiveness and safety of cefiderocol treatment in patients with Gram-negative bacterial infections in Spain in the early access programme: results of the PERSEUS study

PURPOSE

We assessed the effectiveness and safety of cefiderocol in patients with Gram-negative bacterial infections, excluding Acinetobacter spp., in the early access programme (EAP) in Spain.

METHODS

The retrospective, multicentre PERSEUS study (2018-2022) enrolled hospitalised patients with serious Gram-negative infections, except Acinetobacter spp., who received first-time cefiderocol for ≥ 72 h following requests through the EAP. Clinical cure at end of treatment, all-cause mortality at Day 28, cefiderocol use, and adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were the key outcomes.

RESULTS

Overall, 261 patients were eligible for analysis. Median (interquartile range) age was 61 (49-68) years, 202 (77.4%) were male and 165 (63.2%) were in the intensive care unit. The most frequent diagnoses were respiratory tract infection (47.9%), intra-abdominal infection (14.6%), and urinary tract infection (14.6%). The median (IQR) duration of cefiderocol treatment was 10 (7-14) days. Overall, the clinical cure rate was 80.5% (210/261) and the 28-day mortality rate was 21.5% (56/261). In patients with Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection (66.7% [n = 174], including 73 [42%] with metallo-β-lactamases), the clinical cure rate was 84.5% (147/174) and the 28-day mortality was 17.2% (30/174). Logistic regression analysis showed that prior antibiotic treatment for > 7 days (OR 0.19, 95% CI 0.05-0.56) and mechanical ventilation (OR 0.32, 95% CI 0.15-0.67) were independent negative predictive factors for clinical cure. ADRs occurred in seven patients, six events resolved, and one was fatal (toxic epidermal necrolysis).

CONCLUSIONS

Cefiderocol is a valuable option in the treatment of serious Gram-negative bacterial infections, particularly for those caused by P. aeruginosa.

CLINICALTRIALS

GOV: NCT05789199 (Registration date: 16 February 2023).

The Multifaceted Landscape of Healthcare-Associated Infections Caused by Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii

Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) is an emerging and important major cause of nosocomial infections, posing a significant challenge to clinicians worldwide. The intrinsic and acquired resistance mechanisms exhibited by CRAB, associated with its ability to persist in healthcare environments, have transformed it into a critical public health concern. The clinical implications of CRAB infections include severe manifestations, like ventilator-associated pneumonia and bloodstream infections. These infections are often associated with increased morbidity and mortality, particularly in critically ill patients, such as those in intensive care units, immunocompromised, and those undergoing invasive procedures. Considering these characteristics, the therapeutic armamentarium for the treatment of CRAB infections is increasingly limited, as these strains exhibit resistance to a broad range of antibiotics, including carbapenems and the new β-lactam inhibitors, which are considered last-line agents for many bacterial infections. An important role is represented by cefiderocol and data from real-world evidence. The aim of this narrative review is to discuss the main topics of CRAB infection and strategies for prevention, management, and therapy.

Acinetobacter baumannii Complex Infections: New Treatment Options in the Antibiotic Pipeline

Acinetobacter baumannii complex (ABC) can result in a panoply of severe syndromes, including pneumonia and septic shock. Options available for treating infections caused by ABC and, more importantly, by carbapenem-resistant ABC (CRAB) are limited because of the increasing prevalence of antimicrobial resistance. Furthermore, many older agents, such as polymyxin and colistin, have limited lung penetration and are associated with significant toxicities. These factors underscore the urgent need for new paradigms to address ABC and CRAB. Two agents, cefiderocol and sulbactam-durlobactam, are now available to treat CRAB infections. In addition, several anti-infectives that target CRAB are in later-stage clinical trials. In order to place these newer molecules in context and to help clinicians appreciate the emerging potential drug development pipeline, we describe the in vitro activity, mechanisms of action, and clinical trial data not only for the commercially now available alternatives, such as cefiderocol and sulbactam-durlobactam, but also review these topics for molecules undergoing phase II and III clinical trials. Specifically, we discuss and analyze data related to four novel drugs from ABC: BV-100, cefepime-zidebactam, zosurabalpin, and OMN6.

Multidrug-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii: Risk Factors for Mortality in a Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Due to resistance and the lack of treatment options, hospital-acquired Acinetobacter baumannii (A. baumannii) infections are associated with high mortality. This study aimed to analyze the characteristics of patients with infections caused by multidrug-resistant (MDR) A. baumannii and patients' clinical outcomes as well as determine the risk factors for mortality in a tertiary care teaching hospital.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective cohort study including 196 adult patients with A. baumannii strains isolated from different clinical specimens in the Hospital of the Lithuanian University of Health Sciences in 2016, 2017, 2020, and 2021 was conducted. Data on patients' characteristics, comorbid diseases, treatment, length of hospital and ICU stay, and outcome were collected. Carbapenemase-producing isolates were detected phenotypically. To determine risk factors for in-hospital mortality, logistic regression analysis was performed.

RESULTS

There were 60 (30.6%) women and 136 (69.4%) men with a mean age of 61.7 ± 16.6 years (range, 52-74). More than three-fourths (76.5%, n = 150) of the patients had at least one comorbid disease. The highest number of A. baumannii strains were isolated from patients hospitalized in ICUs (43.4%, n = 85). A. baumannii strains producing three types of β-lactamases were more frequently isolated from women than men (77.8% vs. 22.2%, p = 0.006). Infections caused by A. baumannii strains producing two types of β-lactamases were significantly more often treated with combination therapy than infections caused by strains producing one type of β-lactamase (78.9% vs. 60.0%, p = 0.019). Patients with A. baumannii strains producing two different types of β-lactamases (AmpC plus KPC, AmpC plus ESBL, or ESBL plus KPC) stayed significantly shorter at the ICU compared to patients with A. baumannii strains with no detected β-lactamases (median of 9, IQR 2-18, vs. median of 26, IQR 7-38, p = 0.022). Death occurred in 58.7% (n = 115) of patients. Logistic regression analysis showed that a duration of the effective antibiotic treatment of ≤6 days, invasive mechanical ventilation, combination therapy, aged >58 years, and the absence of co-infection were independent predictors of in-hospital mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

MDR A. baumannii infections pose a significant threat to human health not only due to multidrug resistance but also due to high mortality. The mortality rate of patients with MDR A. baumannii infection was high and was associated with age, invasive mechanical ventilation, the duration of effective antibiotic treatment, no co-infection, and combination therapy. Therefore, it is of utmost importance to reduce the prevalence of MDR A. baumannii infections in healthcare facilities by applying preventive measures and to administer timely effective treatment once A. baumannii infection is detected.

Effectiveness and Safety of Cefiderocol in Clinical Practice for Treatment of Patients with Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections: US Interim Results of the PROVE Study

Purpose

The international PROVE retrospective chart-review study aims to assess the real-world effectiveness and safety of cefiderocol for treatment of patients with carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative infections.

Patients and Methods

US centers selected hospitalized patients receiving their first cefiderocol treatment for ≥72 hours for a Gram-negative bacterial infection (November 2020-March 2023). Patient demographics, clinical characteristics, hospitalization, course of infection, antibiotic use, clinical cure (excluding patients with a relapse/reinfection), clinical response at the end of treatment, microbiology, in-hospital all-cause mortality (IH-ACM) at Day 30, and safety were analyzed using descriptive statistics.

Results

This interim analysis included 244 patients. The most frequent infection sites were respiratory tract (55.7%), skin and skin structure (16.8%), and blood (9.8%). The median duration of cefiderocol use was 12 days (interquartile range 8-18.5). Clinical cure was reported for 64.8% (158/244) of patients, clinical response for 74.2% (181/244), and 9.4% (23/244) had relapse/reinfection; 30-day IH-ACM was 18.4% (45/244). Of 82 patients with monomicrobial Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections, 64.6% (n = 53) and 74.4% (n = 61) had clinical cure and clinical response, respectively, and 30-day IH-ACM was 25.6%. Among 43 patients with monomicrobial Acinetobacter baumannii infections, 60.5% (n = 26) and 74.4% (n = 32) had clinical cure and clinical response, respectively, and 30-day IH-ACM was 18.6%. Five patients experienced six adverse drug reactions (one serious event: interstitial nephritis/acute kidney injury), and cefiderocol was discontinued in two cases.

Conclusion

Cefiderocol had similar clinical cure and response rates to previous retrospective studies and lower mortality. Cefiderocol was well tolerated in real-world settings in critically ill US patients with problematic Gram-negative pathogens.

Combination therapy with IV fosfomycin for adult patients with serious Gram-negative infections: a review of the literature

Treatment of patients with serious infections due to resistant Gram-negative bacteria remains highly problematic and has prompted clinicians to use existing antimicrobial agents in innovative ways. One approach gaining increased therapeutic use is combination therapy with IV fosfomycin. This article reviews the preclinical pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) infection model and clinical data surrounding the use of combination therapy with IV fosfomycin for the treatment of serious infections caused by resistant Gram-negative bacteria. Data from dynamic in vitro and animal infection model studies of highly resistant Enterobacterales and non-lactose fermenters are positive and suggest IV fosfomycin in combination with a β-lactam, polymyxin or aminoglycoside produces a synergistic effect that rivals or surpasses that of other aminoglycoside- or polymyxin-containing regimens. Clinical studies performed to date primarily have involved patients with pneumonia and/or bacteraemia due to Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa or Acinetobacter baumannii. Overall, the observed success rates with fosfomycin combination regimens were consistent with those reported for other combination regimens commonly used to treat these patients. In studies in which direct treatment comparisons can be derived, the results suggest that patients who received fosfomycin combination therapy had similar or improved outcomes compared with other therapies and combinations, especially when it was used in combination with a β-lactam that (1) targets PBP-3 and (2) has exceptional stability in the presence of β-lactamases. Collectively, the data indicate that combination therapy with IV fosfomycin should be considered as a potential alternative to aminoglycoside or polymyxin combinations for patients with antibiotic-resistant Gram-negative infections when benefits outweigh risks.

Comparison of cefiderocol and colistin-based regimens for the treatment of severe infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii: a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis

BACKGROUND

There are multiple antibiotic regimens for the treatment of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) in clinical practice. We conducted this meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of cefiderocol-based regimens and colistin-based regimens in the treatment of CRAB infections.

METHODS

Two authors independently searched the PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane databases from their establishment to April 15, 2024, to search for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or cohort studies, and compared the clinical efficacy and safety of cefiderocol-based regimens and colistin-based regimens in the treatment of CRAB infections. The Newcastle Ottawa Scale (NOS) checklist was used to evaluate the quality of the included studies. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality, and subgroup analysis was conducted on the basis of the site of infection and the risk of bias in the studies. Trial sequential analysis (TSA) was then conducted.

RESULTS

Six observational studies were included, with 251 cases in the cefiderocol-based group and 372 cases in the colistin-based group. Compared to the colistin-based group, the cefiderocol-based group had lower all-cause mortality (RR = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.54-0.92, P = 0.01) and 30-day mortality (RR = 0.64, 95% CI: 0.43-0.95, P = 0.03). However, for the 14-day and 28-day mortality rates, there was no statistically significant difference between two groups. According to the subgroup analysis, among patients with bloodstream infection (BSI), the cefiderocol-based group had lower all-cause mortality, but it did not reduce the mortality of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) patients. The result of TSA showed that our conclusions are reliable. There was no significant statistical difference in the microbiological cure rate, clinical cure rate, or duration of hospitalization. In addition, the cefiderocol-based group did not have an increased incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with the colistin-based regimens, the cefiderocol-based regimens were significantly associated with a lower risk of mortality in CRAB-infected patients, especially for patients with BSI. However, they did not show any advantages in terms of the clinical cure rate or microbiological cure rate, nor did they reduce the incidence of AKI.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42023487213.

Use of Cefiderocol in Adult Patients: Descriptive Analysis from a Prospective, Multicenter, Cohort Study

INTRODUCTION

Cefiderocol is a siderophore cephalosporin showing activity against various carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (CR-GNB). No data currently exist about real-world use of cefiderocol in terms of types of therapy (e.g., empirical or targeted, monotherapy or combined regimens), indications, and patient characteristics.

METHODS

In this multicenter, prospective study, we aimed at describing the use of cefiderocol in terms of types of therapy, indications, and patient characteristics.

RESULTS

Cefiderocol was administered as empirical and targeted therapy in 27.5% (55/200) and 72.5% (145/200) of cases, respectively. Overall, it was administered as monotherapy in 101/200 cases (50.5%) and as part of a combined regimen for CR-GNB infections in the remaining 99/200 cases (49.5%). In multivariable analysis, previous isolation of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii odds ratio (OR) 2.56, with 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.01-6.46, p = 0.047] and previous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (OR 8.73, 95% CI 1.05-72.54, p = 0.045) were associated with administration of cefiderocol as part of a combined regimen, whereas chronic kidney disease was associated with cefiderocol monotherapy (OR 0.38 for combined regimen, 95% CI 0.16-0.91, p = 0.029). Cumulative 30-day mortality was 19.8%, 45.0%, 20.7%, and 22.7% in patients receiving targeted cefiderocol for infections by Enterobacterales, A. baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and any metallo-β-lactamase producers, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Cefiderocol is mainly used for targeted treatment, although empirical therapies account for more than 25% of prescriptions, thus requiring dedicated standardization and guidance. The almost equal distribution of cefiderocol monotherapy and cefiderocol-based combination therapies underlines the need for further study to ascertain possible differences in efficacy between the two approaches.

Should we, and how to, optimize cefiderocol administration during severe nosocomial pneumonia due to carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumanii? A viewpoint

OBJECTIVES

Acinetobacter baumannii is classified by the centre for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) as an "urgent threat" due to its ability to acquire and develop resistance to multiple classes of antibiotics. As a result, it is one of the most concerning pathogens in healthcare settings, with increasing incidence of infections due to carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) associated with high morbidity and mortality rates. Therefore, there are ongoing efforts to find novel treatment options, one of which is cefiderocol. We aim to review available evidence on cefiderocol use for severe nosocomial pneumonia due to carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii.

METHODS

A comprehensive review was conducted from 2017 to 2023, covering articles from databases such as Pubmed, Scopus, and Embase, along with conference proceedings from ECCMID 2023. The primary focus was on severe nosocomial pneumonia due A. baumannii and cefiderocol.

DISCUSSION

Cefiderocol, targeting periplasmic space Penicillin-Binding Proteins (PBPs) via siderophore transport pathways, exhibits promise against multi-drug resistant Gram-negative bacilli. Its effectiveness in treating CRAB pneumonia remains debated. The CREDIBLE trial reported higher mortality with cefiderocol compared to the best available treatment, while other cohort studies showed contrasting outcomes. Patient variations and pharmacokinetic factors may underlie these discrepancies. The recommended cefiderocol dosage regimen may fall short of desired pharmacokinetic targets, especially in critically ill patients and lung infections. Pulmonary factors hindering cefiderocol's entry into bacteria through iron transporters are overlooked in clinical breakpoints. Optimized dosing or combination regimens may enhance infection site exposure and outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Further research is needed to determine the optimal cefiderocol dosage and administration (mono vs. dual therapy, continuous vs. intermittent infusion), in severe Acinetobacter baumannii nosocomial pneumonia.

Treatment of infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii

Patients with severe carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) infections currently face significant treatment challenges. When patients display signs of infection and the clinical suspicion of CRAB infections is high, appropriate treatment should be immediately provided. However, current treatment plans and clinical data for CRAB are limited. Inherent and acquired resistance mechanisms, as well as host factors, significantly restrict options for empirical medication. Moreover, inappropriate drug coverage can have detrimental effects on patients. Most existing studies have limitations, such as a restricted sample size, and are predominantly observational or non-randomized, which report significant variability in patient infection severity and comorbidities. Therefore, a gold-standard therapy remains lacking. Current and future treatment options of infections due to CRAB were described in this review. The dose and considerable side effects restrict treatment options for polymyxins, and high doses of ampicillin-sulbactam or tigecycline appear to be the best option at the time of initial treatment. Moreover, new drugs such as durlobactam and cefiderocol have substantial therapeutic capabilities and may be effective salvage treatments. Bacteriophages and antimicrobial peptides may serve as alternative treatment options in the near future. The advantages of a combination antimicrobial regimen appear to predominate those of a single regimen. Despite its significant nephrotoxicity, colistin is considered a primary treatment and is often used in combination with antimicrobials, such as tigecycline, ampicillin-sulbactam, meropenem, or fosfomycin. The Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) has deemed high-dose ampicillin-sulbactam, which is typically combined with high-dose tigecycline, polymyxin, and other antibacterial agents, the best option for treating serious CRAB infections. A rational combination of drug use and the exploration of new therapeutic drugs can alleviate or prevent the effects of CRAB infections, shorten hospital stays, and reduce patient mortality.

Clinical effectiveness of cefiderocol for the treatment of bloodstream infections due to carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii during the COVID-19 era: a single center, observational study

BACKGROUND

We assessed the clinical effectiveness of cefiderocol (CFDC) in comparison with colistin (COL) for the treatment of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) bloodstream infections (BSI).

MATERIALS/METHODS

Retrospective cohort study including adults with CRAB-BSI. Outcomes were mortality, clinical cure and adverse events during therapy. The average treatment effect of CFDC compared to COL was weighted with the inverse-probability treatment weight (IPTW).

RESULTS

Overall, 104 patients were included (50 CFDC, 54 COL), median age 66.5 years, median Charlson Comorbidity Index 5, septic shock in 33.6% of patients. Primary BSI accounted for 43.3% of cases, followed by ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) (26%), catheter-related BSI (20.2%) and hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) (9.6%). Although not significantly, mortality at all time points was lower for CFDC than COL, while clinical cure was higher in CFDC than COL (66% vs. 44.4%, p = 0.027). Adverse events were more frequent in COL than CFDC-group (38.8% vs. 10%, p < 0.0001), primarily attributed to acute kidney injury (AKI) in the COL group. Patients with bacteremic HAP/VAP treated with CFDC had a significant lower 30-d mortality and higher clinical cure than COL (p = 0.008 and p = 0.0008, respectively). Increment of CCI (p = 0.005), ICU (p = 0.025), SARS-CoV2 (p = 0.006) and ECMO (p < 0.0001) were independently associated with 30-d mortality, while receiving CFDC was not associated with survival.

CONCLUSIONS

CFDC could represent an effective and safe treatment option for CRAB BSI, especially in patients with bacteremic HAP/VAP and frail patients where the risk of acute renal failure during therapy should be avoided.

Antibiotic Treatment of Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii Infections in View of the Newly Developed β-Lactams: A Narrative Review of the Existing Evidence

It is estimated that antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is responsible for nearly 5 million human deaths worldwide each year and will reach 10 million by 2050. Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) infections represent the fourth-leading cause of death attributable to antimicrobial resistance globally, but a standardized therapy is still lacking. Among the antibiotics under consideration, Sulbactam/durlobactam seems to be the best candidate to replace current back-bone agents. Cefiderocol could play a pivotal role within combination therapy regimens. Due to toxicity and the pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) limitations, colistin (or polymyxin B) should be used as an alternative agent (when no other options are available). Tigecycline (or minocycline) and fosfomycin could represent suitable partners for both NBLs. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) are needed to better evaluate the role of NBLs in CRAB infection treatment and to compare the efficacy of tigecycline and fosfomycin as partner antibiotics. Synergism should be tested between NBLs and "old" drugs (rifampicin and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole). Huge efforts should be made to accelerate pre-clinical and clinical studies on safer polymyxin candidates with improved lung activity, as well as on the iv rifabutin formulation. In this narrative review, we focused the antibiotic treatment of CRAB infections in view of newly developed β-lactam agents (NBLs).

Cefiderocol in Difficult-to-Treat Nf-GNB in ICU Settings

BACKGROUND

The efficacy and safety of cefiderocol in ICU patients with difficult-to-treat resistance (DTR) non-fermenting Gram-negative bacteria (Nf-GNB) are not as well-established. Consequently, we conducted a cohort study to compare Cefiderocol with the Best Available Therapy (BAT) in ICU patients.

METHODS

We included adult patients from 9 different ICUs, including a burn ICU unit, from 2019 to 2023 treated with Cefiderocol for DTR Nf-GNB isolated from the blood or lungs. We matched each patient at a 1:2 ratio based on the same DTR Nf-GBN isolated pathogen, and when possible, within the same type of ICU (burn unit or not). The primary endpoint of the study was the clinical cure at 15 days, with secondary endpoints including clinical cure at 30 days, relapse, and in-ICU mortality. For each outcome, adjusted odds ratios were estimated using bidirectional stepwise regression in a final model, which included 13 preselected confounders.

RESULTS

We included 27 patients with cefiderocol, matched with 54 patients receiving the BAT. Four patients were not exactly matched on the type of ICU unit. Characteristics were comparable between groups, mostly male with a Charlson Comorbidity Index of 3 [1-5], and 28% had immunosuppression. Cefiderocol patients were most likely to have higher number of antibiotic lines. The main DTR Nf-GNB identified was Pseudomonas aeruginosa (81.5%), followed by Acinetobater baumanii (14.8%) and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (3.7%). Pneumonia was the identified infection in 21 (78.8%) patients in the Cefiderocol group and in 51 (94.4%) patients in the BAT group (p = 0.054). Clinical cure at 15 and 30-day and the in-ICU mortality was comparable between groups, however relapse was higher in the cefiderocol group (8-29.6% vs. 4-7.4%;aOR 10.06[1.96;51.53]) CONCLUSION: Cefiderocol did not show an improvement in clinical cure or mortality rates compared to BAT in the treatment of DTR Nf-GNB, but it was associated with a higher relapse rate.

Current Therapeutic Approaches for Multidrug-Resistant and Extensively Drug-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii Infections

The treatment of Acinetobacter baumannii infections remains a challenge for physicians worldwide in the 21st century. The bacterium possesses a multitude of mechanisms to escape the human immune system. The consequences of A. baumannii infections on morbidity and mortality, as well on financial resources, remain dire. Furthermore, A. baumannii superinfections have also occurred during the COVID-19 pandemic. While prevention is important, the antibiotic armamentarium remains the most essential factor for the treatment of these infections. The main problem is the notorious resistance profile (including resistance to carbapenems and colistin) that this bacterium exhibits. While newer beta lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitors have entered clinical practice, with excellent results against various infections due to Enterobacteriaceae, their contribution against A. baumannii infections is almost absent. Hence, we have to resort to at least one of the following, sulbactam, polymyxins E or B, tigecycline or aminoglycosides, against multidrug-resistant (MDR) and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) A. baumannii infections. Furthermore, the notable addition of cefiderocol in the fight against A. baumannii infections represents a useful addition. We present herein the existing information from the last decade regarding therapeutic advances against MDR/XDR A. baumannii infections.

Cefiderocol either in monotherapy or combination versus best available therapy in the treatment of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii infections: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The best treatment for carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) infections is still a matter of debate.

OBJECTIVES

To describe the outcomes of patients treated with cefiderocol for CRAB infections, and to compare the efficacy of cefiderocol versus best available therapy (BAT).

DATA SOURCES

We searched MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library and EMBASE to screen original reports published up to September 2023.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies investigating 30-day mortality, clinical failure, microbiological failure or rate of adverse drug reactions of patients treated with cefiderocol or BAT.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients with infections due to CRAB.

INTERVENTIONS

Cefiderocol in monotherapy or in combination with other potentially active agents or BAT.

ASSESSMENT OF RISK OF BIAS

We used the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool for RCTs, and the Newcastle Ottawa scale for observational studies.

METHODS OF DATA SYNTHESIS

We conducted a meta-analysis pooling risk ratios (RRs) through random effect models.

RESULTS

We screened 801 original reports, and 18 studies (2 RCTs, 13 cohort studies and 3 case-series) were included in the analysis, for a total 733 patients treated with cefiderocol, and 473 receiving the BAT. Among patients receiving cefiderocol, the 30-day mortality rate was 42% (95% CI 38-47%), the rate of microbiological failure 48% (95% CI 31-65%), the clinical failure rate 43% (95% CI 32-55%), and the rate of ADRs was 3% (95% CI 1-6%). A lower mortality rate was observed among patients receiving cefiderocol monotherapy as compared to those treated with combination regimens (RR: 0.64; 95% CI: 0.43-0.94, p = 0.024). We found a significantly lower mortality rate (RR: 0.74; 95% CI: 0.57-0.95, p = 0.02) and a lower rate of ADRs (RR: 0.28; 95% CI: 0.09-0.91, p = 0.03) in the group treated with cefiderocol as compared to BAT. No difference was observed in microbiological and clinical failure rate.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data strengthen the efficacy and safety profile of cefiderocol in CRAB infections.

Co-Administration of High-Dose Nebulized Colistin for Acinetobacter baumannii Bacteremic Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia: Impact on Outcomes

Acinetobacter baumannii (A. baumannii) is a difficult-to-treat (DTR) pathogen that causes ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) associated with high mortality. To improve the outcome of DTR A. Baumannii VAP, nebulized colistin (NC) was introduced with promising but conflicting results on mortality in earlier studies. Currently, NC is used at a much higher daily dose compared to the past. Nevertheless, there is little evidence on the effect of high-dose NC on the outcomes of A. baumannii VAPs, especially in the current era where the percentage of colistin-resistant A. baumannii strains is rising. We conducted a retrospective study comparing bacteremic A. baumannii VAP patients who were treated with and without NC co-administration and were admitted in the Intensive Care Unit of University Hospital of Ioannina from March 2020 to August 2023. Overall, 59 patients (21 and 38 with and without NC coadministration, respectively) were included. Both 28-day and 7-day mortalities were significantly lower in the patient group treated with NC (52.4% vs. 78.9%, p 0.034 and 9.5% vs. 47.4%, p 0.003, respectively). Patients treated with NC had a higher percentage of sepsis resolution by day 7 (38.1% vs. 13.5%, p 0.023) and were more likely to be off vasopressors by day 7 (28.6% vs. 8.1%, p 0.039). The addition of NC in the treatment regime of A. baumannii VAP decreased mortality.

Clinical efficacy of cefiderocol-based regimens in patients with carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii infections: A systematic review with meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To perform a systematic review with meta-analysis to assess the clinical efficacy of cefiderocol-based regimens for the treatment of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) infections.

METHODS

Two authors independently searched PubMed-MEDLINE, Scopus, and Cochrane databases, from inception to 02 July 2023, for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or observational studies comparing clinical efficacy of cefiderocol-based vs. non-cefiderocol-based regimens in patients with CRAB infections. Data were extracted by the two authors independently, and the quality of included studies was independently assessed using ROB 2.0 or ROBINS-I tools. Primary outcome was mortality rate. Meta-analysis was performed by pooling odds ratios (ORs) retrieved from studies providing adjustment for confounders using a random-effects model with the inverse variance method. Multiple subgroups and sensitivity analyses were conducted to investigate the source of heterogeneity.

RESULTS

A total of 530 articles were screened, and 6 studies (1 RCT and 5 observational; N=561; 247 cefiderocol-based vs. 314 non-cefiderocol-based regimens) were included. Cefiderocol did not significantly reduce in-hospital mortality compared to alternative therapies (predominantly colistin-based), but the confidence intervals around the effect estimate included clinically important benefit (N=5; OR 0.64; 95%CI 0.40-1.04; I2=57.5%). When only observational studies providing adjustment for confounders were considered, a lower risk of mortality was found in patients treated with cefiderocol-based regimens (N=4; OR 0.53; 95%CI 0.39-0.71; I2=0.0%).

CONCLUSIONS

Cefiderocol-based regimens were associated with a significantly lower risk of mortality in patients with CRAB infections in observational studies providing proper adjustment for confounders.

Risk factors and prognosis for the development of acute kidney injury in patients using colistin in the intensive care unit: A retrospective cohort study

Colistin, an antibiotic of polymyxin group, has recently been increasingly used in the treatment of multidrug resistant gram-negative bacteria. However, it has serious adverse effects such as acute kidney injury (AKI). We aimed to determine the factors affecting the development of AKI due to colistin, which has serious adverse effects, such as nephrotoxicity and neurotoxicity. We retrospectively analyzed the data of patients who received colistin for multidrug resistant gram-negative sepsis in adult intensive care units between January 2020 and December 2022. Demographic data, blood test results, concomitant drug use, need for renal replacement therapy, and mortality were recorded. Kidney damage was assessed according to the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes criterion. We obtained data from 103 patients, 45 (43.7%) of whom were women. The most common comorbidity was a neurological disorder. Renal damage developed in 59.2% of patients. Renal replacement was required in 50.8% of the patients. Among patients who received colistin, 64.1% died. The use of vasopressors, diuretics, nephrotoxic agents with colistin, advanced age, and hypoalbuminemia were more common in patients with renal injury. Multivariate regression analysis showed that vasopressor use, prior creatinine elevation, and diuretic use were independent risk factors for colistin-induced AKI. Vasoactive agent use, previous kidney injury, and furosemide use were independent risk factors for colistin-induced nephrotoxicity. Considering these factors may be instructive for better monitoring of patients when colistin is required in intensive care units.

Cefiderocol and Sulbactam-Durlobactam against Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii

Infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) remain a clinical challenge due to limited treatment options. Recently, cefiderocol, a novel siderophore cephalosporin, and sulbactam-durlobactam, a bactericidal β-lactam-β-lactamase inhibitor combination, have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of A. baumannii infections. In this review, we discuss the mechanisms of action of and resistance to cefiderocol and sulbactam-durlobactam, the antimicrobial susceptibility of A. baumannii isolates to these drugs, as well as the clinical effectiveness of cefiderocol and sulbactam/durlobactam-based regimens against CRAB. Overall, cefiderocol and sulbactam-durlobactam show an excellent antimicrobial activity against CRAB. The review of clinical studies evaluating the efficacy of cefiderocol therapy against CRAB indicates it is non-inferior to colistin/other treatments for CRAB infections, with a better safety profile. Combination treatment is not associated with improved outcomes compared to monotherapy. Higher mortality rates are often associated with prior patient comorbidities and the severity of the underlying infection. Regarding sulbactam-durlobactam, current data from the pivotal clinical trial and case reports suggest this antibiotic combination could be a valuable option in critically ill patients affected by CRAB infections, in particular where no other antibiotic appears to be effective.

An Overview of Cefiderocol's Therapeutic Potential and Underlying Resistance Mechanisms

Antimicrobial resistance continues to increase globally and treatment of difficult-to-treat (DTT) infections, mostly associated with carbapenem-resistant (CR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa, CR Acinetobacter baumannii, and CR- and third-generation-cephalosporins-resistant Enterobacterales remains a challenge for the clinician. The recent approval of cefiderocol has broaden the armamentarium for the treatment of patients with DTT infections. Cefiderocol is a siderophore cephalosporin that has shown excellent antibacterial activity, in part due to its innovative way of cell permeation. It is relatively stable compared to most commonly found carbapenamases. However, some resistant mechanisms to cefiderocol have already been identified and reduced susceptibility has developed during patient treatment, highlighting that the clinical use of cefiderocol must be rational. In this review, we summarize the current available treatments against the former resistant bacteria, and we revise and discuss the mechanism of action of cefiderocol, underlying the biological function of siderophores, the therapeutic potential of cefiderocol, and the mechanisms of resistance reported so far.