Effect of Magnesium Supplementation on Circulating Biomarkers of Cardiovascular Disease

Distinctive blood and salivary proteomics signatures in Qatari individuals at high risk for cardiovascular disease

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains a leading cause of global morbidity and mortality. Timely diagnosis is important in reducing both short and long-term health complications. Saliva has emerged as a potential source for biomarker discovery, offering a non-invasive tool for early detection of individuals at elevated risk for CVD, yet large-scale extensive proteomic analysis using saliva for a comprehensive biomarker discovery remains limited. In an effort to develop a diagnostic tool using saliva samples, our study aims to assess the salivary and plasma proteomes in subjects with high risk of developing CVD using a large-scale proteomic approach. Leveraging on the SOMAscan platform, we analyzed 1,317 proteins in saliva and plasma collected from subjects at a high risk of CVD (HR-CVD) and compared the profiles to subjects with low risk of CVD (LR-CVD). Our analysis revealed significant differences in the plasma and salivary proteins between the two groups. Pathway enrichment analysis of the differentially detected proteins revealed that the immune system activation and extracellular matrix remodeling are the most enriched pathways in the CVD-HR group. Comparing proteomic signatures between plasma and saliva, we found approximately 42 and 17 differentially expressed proteins associated with CVD-HR uniquely expressed in plasma and saliva respectively. Additionally, we identified eight common CVD-risk biomarkers shared between both plasma and saliva, demonstrating promising diagnostic tools for identifying individuals at high risk of developing CVD. In conclusion, saliva proteomics holds a significant promise to identify subjects with a high risk to develop CVD. Further studies are needed to validate our findings.

Identification of novel candidate biomarkers for acute myocardial infarction by the Olink proteomics platform

BACKGROUND

Both pathological and normal processes depend on proteins. In this study, plasma protein profiles were analyzed by a novel proximity extension assay (PEA) to identify potential pathogenic mechanisms and diagnostic biomarkers in patients diagnosed with acute myocardial infarction (AMI).

METHODS

In this study, we identified a total of 92 plasma proteins using the Olink Target 96 Cardiovascular III panel in a cohort consisting of 30 healthy controls (HC), 28 patients with unstable angina (UA) and 30 patients with AMI. Subsequently, we conducted a differential expression analysis to identify protein molecules that were specifically expressed in patients with AMI. To gain insights into the potential functional mechanisms of these differentially expressed molecules, we performed Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway analyses. Following that, the utilization of least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression facilitated the identification of potential protein biomarkers, enabling the differentiation between AMI and UA. A diagnostic model was subsequently developed through logistic regression, and the effectiveness of these markers was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Ultimately, the diagnostic capabilities of these potential biomarkers were validated in an independent validation cohort consisting of 30 UA cases and 30 AMI cases.

RESULTS

In this study, a comprehensive analysis of plasma proteins identified a total of 92 proteins. Further analysis using analysis of variance revealed that 25 proteins exhibited specific expression in the AMI group compared to the HC and UA groups. Additionally, KEGG enrichment analysis indicated that these differentially expressed proteins were primarily associated with the activation of cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction, PI3K-Akt signaling pathway, and GnRH signaling pathway. AGRP, TGM2, IL6, GH1, and CA5A were identified through LASSO regression as prospective protein biomarkers for distinguishing between UA and AMI. The diagnostic model comprising these five proteins exhibited exceptional performance in both the discovery and validation datasets, surpassing AUC values of 0.9.

CONCLUSION

The findings of our study provide additional insights into the involvement of the inflammatory response and AKT cascade response in the development of AMI. Moreover, we have identified potential protein markers that could be utilized for the accurate diagnosis of AMI. These results offer a fresh perspective for clinical decision-making in the context of AMI.

Vitamin and Mineral Supplements for the Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease and Cancer: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force

IMPORTANCE

Cardiovascular disease and cancer are the 2 leading causes of death in the US, and vitamin and mineral supplementation has been proposed to help prevent these conditions.

OBJECTIVE

To review the benefits and harms of vitamin and mineral supplementation in healthy adults to prevent cardiovascular disease and cancer to inform the US Preventive Services Task Force.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE, PubMed (publisher-supplied records only), Cochrane Library, and Embase (January 2013 to February 1, 2022); prior reviews.

STUDY SELECTION

English-language randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of vitamin or mineral use among adults without cardiovascular disease or cancer and with no known vitamin or mineral deficiencies; observational cohort studies examining serious harms.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Single extraction, verified by a second reviewer. Quantitative pooling methods appropriate for rare events were used for most analyses.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Mortality, cardiovascular disease events, cancer incidence, serious harms.

RESULTS

Eighty-four studies (N=739 803) were included. In pooled analyses, multivitamin use was significantly associated with a lower incidence of any cancer (odds ratio [OR], 0.93 [95% CI, 0.87-0.99]; 4 RCTs [n=48 859]; absolute risk difference [ARD] range among adequately powered trials, -0.2% to -1.2%) and lung cancer (OR, 0.75 [95% CI, 0.58-0.95]; 2 RCTs [n=36 052]; ARD, 0.2%). However, the evidence for multivitamins had important limitations. Beta carotene (with or without vitamin A) was significantly associated with an increased risk of lung cancer (OR, 1.20 [95% CI, 1.01-1.42]; 4 RCTs [n=94 830]; ARD range, -0.1% to 0.6%) and cardiovascular mortality (OR, 1.10 [95% CI, 1.02-1.19]; 5 RCTs [n=94 506] ARD range, -0.8% to 0.8%). Vitamin D use was not significantly associated with all-cause mortality (OR, 0.96 [95% CI, 0.91-1.02]; 27 RCTs [n=117 082]), cardiovascular disease (eg, composite cardiovascular disease event outcome: OR, 1.00 [95% CI, 0.95-1.05]; 7 RCTs [n=74 925]), or cancer outcomes (eg, any cancer incidence: OR, 0.98 [95% CI, 0.92-1.03]; 19 RCTs [n=86 899]). Vitamin E was not significantly associated with all-cause mortality (OR, 1.02 [95% CI, 0.97-1.07]; 9 RCTs [n=107 772]), cardiovascular disease events (OR, 0.96 [95% CI, 0.90-1.04]; 4 RCTs [n=62 136]), or cancer incidence (OR, 1.02 [95% CI, 0.98-1.08]; 5 RCTs [n=76 777]). Evidence for benefit of other supplements was equivocal, minimal, or absent. Limited evidence suggested some supplements may be associated with higher risk of serious harms (hip fracture [vitamin A], hemorrhagic stroke [vitamin E], and kidney stones [vitamin C, calcium]).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Vitamin and mineral supplementation was associated with little or no benefit in preventing cancer, cardiovascular disease, and death, with the exception of a small benefit for cancer incidence with multivitamin use. Beta carotene was associated with an increased risk of lung cancer and other harmful outcomes in persons at high risk of lung cancer.

Effect of Magnesium Supplementation on Inflammatory Parameters: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Magnesium (Mg) may have several beneficial effects on human health outcomes. One hypothesized mechanism eliciting such effects is the action of Mg on serum inflammatory parameters. However, studies on this topic to date have several important limitations. Therefore, the present systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to summarize the current state of the art of all randomized control trials (RCTs) investigating the effects of Mg supplementation versus placebo on serum parameters of inflammation. We searched several databases until 23 November 2021 for RCTs. Eligible studies were RCTs investigating the effect of oral Mg supplementation vs. placebo and having serum inflammatory markers as an outcome. Among 2484 papers initially screened, 17 randomized controlled trials (889 participants; mean age: 46 years; females: 62.5%) were included. Generally, a low risk of bias was present. In meta-analysis, Mg supplementation significantly decreased serum C reactive protein (CRP) and increased nitric oxide (NO) levels. In descriptive findings, Mg supplementation significantly reduced plasma fibrinogen, tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase type 5, tumor necrosis factor-ligand superfamily member 13B, ST2 protein, and IL-1. In conclusion, Mg supplementation may significantly reduce different human inflammatory markers, in particular serum CRP and NO levels.

Magnesium and Micro-Elements in Older Persons

Macro- and micro-element deficiencies are widely diffused in older people [...].

Ionized or Total Magnesium levels, what should we measure in critical ill patients?

Monitoring and measuring magnesium (Mg) values are essential to prevent the development of numerous complications in perioperative medicine and critically ill patients. Although previous studies suggest that measuring free ionized magnesium (iMg) is more useful for estimating Mg status, clinicians currently rely on measurement of total serum magnesium to determine if supplemental magnesium is needed. In this review, we analyzed the recent literature to decide whether it is better to measure ionized serum Mg or total serum Mg when assessing magnesium status, whether iMg predicts clinical outcome, and what are the difficulties in measuring serum iMg levels in intensive care patients and perioperative medicine.